INPP4B overexpression suppresses migration, invasion and angiogenesis of human prostate cancer cells

INPP4B suppresses HER2-induced mesenchymal transition in HER2+ breast cancer and enhances sensitivity to Lapatinib

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) tends to metastasize and has a bad prognosis due to its high malignancy and rapid progression. Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase isoenzymes type II (INPP4B) plays unequal roles in the development of various cancers. However, the function of INPP4B in HER2+ BC has not been elucidated. Here we found that INPP4B expression was significantly lower in HER2+ BC and positively correlated with the prognosis by bioinformatics and tissue immunofluorescence analyses. Overexpression of INPP4B inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and growth of xenografts in HER2+ BC cells. Conversely, depletion of INPP4B reversed these effects and activated the PDK1/AKT and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) progression. Moreover, INPP4B overexpression blocked epidermal growth factor (EGF) -induced cell proliferation, migration and EMT progression, whereas INPP4B depletion antagonized HER2 depletion in reduction of cell proliferation and migration of HER2+ BC cells. Additionally, Lapatinib (LAP) inhibited HER2+ BC cell survival, proliferation and migration, and its effect was further enhanced by overexpression of INPP4B. In summary, our results illustrate that INPP4B suppresses HER2+ BC growth, migration and EMT, and its expression level affects patient outcome, further providing new insights into clinical practice.

Downregulation of INPP4B is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

Background

INPP4B is a tyrosine-specific phosphatase in the human body, which plays an important role in the developing process of carcinogenesis. However, The correlation between INPP4B and epithelial ovarian cancer is rarely explored. In this study, the expression of INPP4B in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma and normal ovaries was detected, to explore the correlation between INPP4B expression and clinicopathological risk factors of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to clarify its significance in the developing process of and prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Methods

The expression of INPP4B in various tumors was detected by bioinformatics method, and the expression in epithelial ovarian cancer and normal control group was detected by Elisa. The immunohistochemical method was used in this experiment to analyze the expression of INPP4B in specimens of 100 cases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and 20 cases of normal ovaries. Analysis of clinicopathological risk factors and related survival analysis was carried out on the expression of INPP4B in 100 cases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Results

The results showed that the positive expressed INPP4B protein in epithelial ovarian carcinoma was significantly less, compared with that in normal ovaries (P < 0.05). The expression of INPP4B was significantly associated with many clinicopathologic factors, such as tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), FIGO stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) and distant metastasis at recurrence (P=0. 009), but not with age, pathologic type of tumor, serum CA125 at recurrence and chemotherapy sensitivity.

Conclusion

In epithelial ovarian carcinoma, there is a downregulation of INPP4B expression, which may be related to poor tumor differentiation, late FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis at recurrence and insensitivity to chemotherapy. Under-expression of INPP4B, lymph node metastasis, FIGO stage, and distant metastasis at recurrence are factors of poor prognostic. The under-expression level of INPP4B may be involved in the progression of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Addressing the Reciprocal Crosstalk between the AR and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathways for Prostate Cancer Treatment

The reduction in androgen synthesis and the blockade of the androgen receptor (AR) function by chemical castration and AR signaling inhibitors represent the main treatment lines for the initial stages of prostate cancer. Unfortunately, resistance mechanisms ultimately develop due to alterations in the AR pathway, such as gene amplification or mutations, and also the emergence of alternative pathways that render the tumor less or, more rarely, completely independent of androgen activation. An essential oncogenic axis activated in prostate cancer is the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, as evidenced by the frequent alterations of the negative regulator phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and by the activating mutations in PI3K subunits. Additionally, crosstalk and reciprocal feedback loops between androgen signaling and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade that activate pro-survival signals and play an essential role in disease recurrence and progression have been evidenced. Inhibitors addressing different players of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been evaluated in the clinic. Only a limited benefit has been reported in prostate cancer up to now due to the associated side effects, so novel combination approaches and biomarkers predictive of patient response are urgently needed. Here, we reviewed recent data on the crosstalk between AR signaling and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, the selective inhibitors identified, and the most advanced clinical studies, with a focus on combination treatments. A deeper understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms involved in disease progression and treatment resistance is essential to further guide therapeutic approaches with improved outcomes.

INPP4B inhibits glioma cell proliferation and immune escape via inhibition of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

INPP4B (Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II) has been regarded as a suppressor of several human tumors, but its biological function, expression, and clinical significance in glioma tissues and cell lines are unclear. Notably, whether INPP4B participates in immune escape of glioma deserves urgent attention. Here, we confirmed that INPP4B expression is often downregulated in low- and high-grade human glioma tissues, in tissues from an orthotopic mouse model of brain glioma and in glioma cells. We found that INPP4B overexpression restrained the proliferation, migration, apoptosis resistance, PD-L1 expression, and T cell suppression by glioma cells, whereas INPP4B silencing had the opposite effects. Moreover, we showed that INPP4B inhibited glioma cell proliferation, migration, and PD-L1 expression by downregulating PI3K/AKT signaling. Collectively, these data support that INPP4B may inhibit glioma progression, and particularly, glioma’s immune escape. Thus, INPP4B may constitute a valuable target for glioma treatment.

The INPP4B paradox: Like PTEN, but different

Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease marked by the dysregulation of cancer driver genes historically classified as oncogenes or tumour suppressors according to their ability to promote or inhibit tumour development and growth, respectively. Certain genes display both oncogenic and tumour suppressor functions depending on the biological context, and as such have been termed dual-role cancer driver genes. However, because of their context-dependent behaviour, the tumourigenic mechanism of many dual-role genes is elusive and remains a significant knowledge gap in our effort to understand and treat cancer. Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) is an emerging dual-role cancer driver gene, primarily known for its role as a negative regulator of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signalling pathway. In response to growth factor stimulation, class I PI3K generates PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ at the plasma membrane. PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ can be hydrolysed by inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases to generate PtdIns(3,4)P₂, which, together with PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃, facilitates the activation of AKT to promote cell proliferation, survival, migration, and metabolism. Phosphatase and tensin homology on chromosome 10 (PTEN) and INPP4B are dual-specificity phosphatases that hydrolyse PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ and PtdIns(3,4)P₂, respectively, and thus negatively regulate PI3K/AKT signalling. PTEN is a bona fide tumour suppressor that is frequently lost in human tumours. INPP4B was initially characterised as a tumour suppressor akin to PTEN, and has been implicated as such in a number of cancers, including prostate, thyroid, and basal-like breast cancers. However, evidence has since emerged revealing INPP4B as a paradoxical oncogene in several malignancies, with increased INPP4B expression reported in AML, melanoma and colon cancers among others. Although the tumour suppressive function of INPP4B has been mostly ascribed to its ability to negatively regulate PI3K/AKT signalling, its oncogenic function remains less clear, with proposed mechanisms including promotion of PtdIns(3)P-dependent SGK3 signalling, inhibition of PTEN-dependent AKT activation, and enhancing DNA repair mechanisms to confer chemoresistance. Nevertheless, research is ongoing to identify the factors that dictate the tumourigenic output of INPP4B in different human cancers. In this review we discuss the dualistic role that INPP4B plays in the context of cancer development, progression and treatment, drawing comparisons to PTEN to explore how their similarities and, importantly, their differences may account for their diverging roles in tumourigenesis.

Targeting DNA repair pathway in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical application

Over the last decades, the growing understanding on DNA damage response (DDR) pathways has broadened the therapeutic landscape in oncology. It is becoming increasingly clear that the genomic instability of cells resulted from deficient DNA damage response contributes to the occurrence of cancer. One the other hand, these defects could also be exploited as a therapeutic opportunity, which is preferentially more deleterious in tumor cells than in normal cells. An expanding repertoire of DDR-targeting agents has rapidly expanded to inhibitors of multiple members involved in DDR pathways, including PARP, ATM, ATR, CHK1, WEE1, and DNA-PK. In this review, we sought to summarize the complex network of DNA repair machinery in cancer cells and discuss the underlying mechanism for the application of DDR inhibitors in cancer. With the past preclinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials, we also provide an overview of the history and current landscape of DDR inhibitors in cancer treatment, with special focus on the combination of DDR-targeted therapies with other cancer treatment strategies.

INPP4B exerts a dual role in gastric cancer progression and prognosis

Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) negatively regulates PI3K-Akt signalling and plays diverse roles in different types of cancer, but its role in gastric cancer (GC) is still unknown. Our study aimed to investigate the function and clinical relevance of INPP4B in GC. INPP4B expression was detected in GC tissues and nontumour tissues. The effect of INPP4B on the phenotypic changes of AGS and BGC-823 cells was investigated in vitro. The activation of serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 3 (SGK3) and AKT were used to evaluate the specific mechanistic function of INPP4B in GC cells. The messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression levels of INPP4B were decreased in GC tissues compared with nontumour tissues. INPP4B expression was associated with tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and histopathological differentiation. In addition, high INPP4B expression in GC patients with large tumour size/low-undifferentiated/TNM's III-IV stage was correlated with a poor prognosis but it was correlated with a better prognosis in patients with small tumour size/high-moderate differentiated/TNM's I-II stage patients. In addition, INPP4B knockdown inhibited proliferation, clonal formation and migration and promoted cell apoptosis in vitro, while INPP4B overexpression led to the opposite effects. Mechanistically, we found that INPP4B overexpression enhanced the phosphorylation of SGK3 (p-SGK3) in AGS cells, whereas INPP4B knockdown enhanced the p-Akt level in BGC823 cells. These findings suggested that the expression of INPP4B in GC is lower than that in normal tissues. Based on stratification survival analysis and in vitro cell experiments, INPP4B may play dual roles as an oncogene and tumour suppressor gene in different tissue grades and clinical stages.

Expression and functional characterization of INPP4B in gallbladder cancer patients and gallbladder cancer cells

Background

Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) is a negative regulator of the PI3K-Akt signalling pathway and plays a contradictory role in different types of cancers. However, the its biological role played by INPP4B in human gallbladder cancer (GBC) has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the expression, clinical significance and biological function of INPP4B in GBC patients and cell lines.

Methods

The INPP4B protein expression levels in gallbladder cancer tissues and normal gallbladder tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry, and the clinical significance of INPP4B was analysed. Knockdown and overexpression of INPP4B in GBC-SD and SGC-996 cells followed by cell proliferation, clonogenic, apoptosis detection, scratch wound-healing and transwell assays were used to identify INPP4B function in vitro.

Results

INPP4B was up-regulated in human GBC tissues compared with normal gallbladder tissues and was related to histopathological differentiation (p = 0.026). Here, we observed that INPP4B was highly expressed in high-moderately differentiated tumours compared with low-undifferentiated tumours (p = 0.022). Additionally, we found that INPP4B expression was not associated with overall survival of GBC patients (p = 0.071) and was not an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, when we stratified the relationship between INPP4B expression and the prognosis of GBC based on histopathological differentiation, we found that INPP4B played a contradictory role in GBC progression depending on the degree of differentiation. In addition, INPP4B knockdown inhibited the proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion in GBC cells, while INPP4B overexpression had the opposite effects in vitro, which indicates its role as an oncoprotein.

Conclusions

These findings suggested that INPP4B may play a dual role in the prognosis of GBC depending on the degree of differentiation and that INPP4B might act as an oncogene in gallbladder cancer cells.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08143-6.

Estrogen receptor β regulates AKT activity through up-regulation of INPP4B and inhibits migration of prostate cancer cell line PC-3

Loss of the tumor suppressor, PTEN, is one of the most common findings in prostate cancer (PCa). This loss leads to overactive Akt signaling, which is correlated with increased metastasis and androgen independence. However, another tumor suppressor, inositol-polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B), can partially compensate for the loss of PTEN. INPP4B is up-regulated by androgens, and this suggests that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) would lead to hyperactivity of AKT. However, in the present study, we found that in PCa, samples from men treated with ADT, ERβ, and INPP4B expression were maintained in some samples. To investigate the role of ERβ1 in regulation of INPPB, we engineered the highly metastatic PCa cell line, PC3, to express ERβ1. In these cells, INPP4B was induced by ERβ ligands, and this induction was accompanied by inhibition of Akt activity and reduction in cell migration. These findings reveal that, in the absence of androgens, ERβ1 induces INPP4B to dampen AKT signaling. Since the endogenous ERβ ligand, 3β-Adiol, is lost upon long-term ADT, to obtain the beneficial effects of ERβ1 on AKT signaling, an ERβ agonist should be added along with ADT.

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR Pathway and Prostate Cancer: At the Crossroads of AR, MAPK, and WNT Signaling

Oncogenic activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (PKB/AKT), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a frequent event in prostate cancer that facilitates tumor formation, disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Recent discoveries indicate that the complex crosstalk between the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and multiple interacting cell signaling cascades can further promote prostate cancer progression and influence the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to PI3K-AKT-mTOR-targeted therapies being explored in the clinic, as well as standard treatment approaches such as androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the full extent of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling network during prostate tumorigenesis, invasive progression and disease recurrence remains to be determined. In this review, we outline the emerging diversity of the genetic alterations that lead to activated PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling in prostate cancer, and discuss new mechanistic insights into the interplay between the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and several key interacting oncogenic signaling cascades that can cooperate to facilitate prostate cancer growth and drug-resistance, specifically the androgen receptor (AR), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and WNT signaling cascades. Ultimately, deepening our understanding of the broader PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling network is crucial to aid patient stratification for PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway-directed therapies, and to discover new therapeutic approaches for prostate cancer that improve patient outcome.

A robust 6-mRNA signature for prognosis prediction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. PDAC prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers are still being explored. The aim of this study is to establish a robust molecular signature that can improve the ability to predict PDAC prognosis. 155 overlapping differentially expressed genes between tumor and non-tumor tissues from three Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were explored. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) Cox regression model was employed for selecting prognostic genes. We developed a 6-mRNA signature that can distinguish high PDAC risk patients from low risk patients with significant differences in overall survival (OS). We further validated this signature prognostic value in three independent cohorts (GEO batch, P < 0.0001; ICGC, P = 0.0036; Fudan, P = 0.029). Furthermore, we found that our signature remained significant in patients with different histologic grade, TNM stage, locations of tumor entity, age and gender. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that 6-mRNA signature can be an independent prognostic marker in each of the cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis also showed that our signature possessed a better predictive role of PDAC prognosis. Moreover, the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis showed that several tumorigenesis and metastasis related pathways were indeed associated with higher scores of risk. In conclusion, identifying the 6-mRNA signature could provide a valuable classification method to evaluate clinical prognosis and facilitate personalized treatment for PDAC patients. New therapeutic targets may be developed upon the functional analysis of the classifier genes and their related pathways.

ATM in DNA repair in cancer

Alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are hallmarks of cancer. Incorrect repair of DNA lesions often leads to genomic instability. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a core component of the DNA repair system, is activated to enhance the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway upon DNA double-strand breaks. Although ATM signaling has been widely studied in different types of cancer, its research is still lacking compared with other DDR-involved molecules such as PARP and ATR. There is still a vast research opportunity for the development of ATM inhibitors as anticancer agents. Here, we focus on the recent findings of ATM signaling in DNA repair of cancer. Previous studies have identified several partners of ATM, some of which promote ATM signaling, while others have the opposite effect. ATM inhibitors, including KU-55933, KU-60019, KU-59403, CP-466722, AZ31, AZ32, AZD0156, and AZD1390, have been evaluated for their antitumor effects. It has been revealed that ATM inhibition increases a cancer cell's sensitivity to radiotherapy. Moreover, the combination with PARP or ATR inhibitors has synergistic lethality in some cancers. Of note, among these ATM inhibitors, AZD0156 and AZD1390 achieve potent and highly selective ATM kinase inhibition and have an excellent ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Currently, AZD0156 and AZD1390 are under investigation in phase I clinical trials. Taken together, targeting ATM may be a promising strategy for cancer treatment. Hence, further development of ATM inhibitors is urgently needed in cancer research.

Distinct transcriptional repertoire of the androgen receptor in ETS fusion-negative prostate cancer

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) tumors harboring translocations of ETS family genes with the androgen responsive TMPRSS2 gene (ETS+ tumors) provide a robust biomarker for detecting PCa in approximately 70% of patients. ETS+ PCa express high levels of the androgen receptor (AR), yet PCa tumors lacking ETS fusions (ETS−) also express AR and demonstrate androgen-regulated growth. In this study, we evaluate the differences in the AR-regulated transcriptomes between ETS+ and ETS− PCa tumors.

Methods

10,608 patient tumors from three independent PCa datasets classified as ETS+ (samples overexpressing ERG or other ETS family members) or ETS− (all other PCa) were analyzed for differential gene expression using false-discovery-rate adjusted methods and gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA).

Results

Based on the expression of AR-dependent genes and an unsupervised Principal Component Analysis (PCA) model, AR-regulated gene expression alone was able to separate PCa samples into groups based on ETS status in all PCa databases. ETS status distinguished several differentially expressed genes in both TCGA (6.9%) and GRID (6.6%) databases, with 413 genes overlapping in both databases. Importantly, GSEA showed enrichment of distinct androgen-responsive genes in both ETS− and ETS+ tumors, and AR ChIP-seq data identified 131 direct AR-target genes that are regulated in an ETS-specific fashion. Notably, dysregulation of ETS-dependent AR-target genes within the metabolic and non-canonical WNT pathways was associated with clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

ETS status influences the transcriptional repertoire of the AR, and ETS− PCa tumors appear to rely on distinctly different AR-dependent transcriptional programs to drive and sustain tumorigenesis.