A prospective, randomized trial of intravenous hydroxocobalamin versus noradrenaline or saline for treatment of lipopolysaccharide-induced hypotension in a swine model

Comparison of hydroxocobalamin with other resuscitative fluids in volume-controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage models in swine ( Sus-scrofa )

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in military environments. Treatment with resuscitative fluids and blood components is based on availability, thus, frequently unavailable in the prehospital setting, due to lack of resources and costs. Hydroxocobalamin (HOC), increases blood pressure via nitric oxide scavenging. We evaluated HOC as a resuscitation fluid, in two swine hemorrhage models. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate whether HOC treatment following hemorrhagic shock improves hemodynamic parameters and (2) determine whether those effects are comparable to whole blood (WB) and lactated ringers (LR).

METHODS

Yorkshire swine (S us scrofa ) (n = 72) were used in models of controlled hemorrhage (CH) (n = 36) and uncontrolled hemorrhage (UH) (n = 36). Randomized animals received treatment with 500 mL of either WB, LR, HOC (150 mg/kg), followed by a six-hour observation (n = 6 each group). Survival, hemodynamics, blood gases (ABGs) and chemistries were collected. Data reported as mean ± standard error of the mean and statistical analysis by ANOVA ( p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Blood loss for CH was 41% ± 0.02 versus 33% ± 0.07 for UH. For CH, HOC treatment maintained higher systolic blood pressure (sBP, mm Hg) compared with WB and LR (72 ± 1.1; 60 ± 0.8; 58 ± 1.6; respectively). Heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), Sp o2 and vascular resistance were comparable with WB and LR. The ABG values were comparable between HOC and WB. For UH, HOC treatment maintained sBP levels comparable to WB and higher than LR (70 ± 0.9; 73 ± 0.5; 56 ± 1.2). HR, CO, Sp o2 , and systemic vascular resistance were comparable between HOC and WB. Survival, hemodynamics, blood gases were comparable between HOC and WB. No survival differences were found between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Hydroxocobalamin treatment improved hemodynamic parameters and Ca 2+ levels compared with LR and equivalent to WB, in both models. Hydroxocobalamin may be a viable alternative when WB is not available.

High-Dose IV Hydroxocobalamin (Vitamin B12) in Septic Shock: A Double-Blind, Allocation-Concealed, Placebo-Controlled Single-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (The Intravenous Hydroxocobalamin in Septic Shock Trial)

BACKGROUND

Elevated hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) contributes to vasodilatation and hypotension in septic shock, and traditional therapies do not target this pathophysiologic mechanism. High-dose IV hydroxocobalamin scavenges and prevents H₂S formation, which may restore vascular tone and may accentuate recovery. No experimental human studies have tested high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin in adults with septic shock.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In adults with septic shock, is comparing high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin with placebo feasible?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 single-center, double-blind, allocation-concealed, placebo-controlled, parallel-group pilot randomized controlled trial comparing high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin with placebo in critically ill adults with septic shock. Patients meeting Sepsis 3 criteria were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 5-g dose of high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin or equivalent volume 0.9% saline solution as placebo. The primary outcome was study feasibility (enrollment rate, clinical and laboratory compliance rate, and contamination rate). Secondary outcomes included between-group differences in plasma H₂S concentrations and vasopressor dose before and after infusion.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled over 19 months, establishing an enrollment rate of 1.05 patients per month. Protocol adherence rates were 100% with zero contamination. In the high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin group, compared to placebo, there was a greater reduction in vasopressor dose between randomization and postinfusion (-36% vs 4%, P < .001) and randomization and 3-h postinfusion (-28% vs 10%, P = .019). In the high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin group, the plasma H₂S level was reduced over 45 mins by -0.80 ± 1.73 μM, as compared with -0.21 ± 0.64 μM in the placebo group (P = .3).

INTERPRETATION

This pilot trial established favorable feasibility metrics. Consistent with the proposed mechanism of benefit, high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin compared with placebo was associated with reduced vasopressor dose and H₂S levels at all time points and without serious adverse events. These data provide the first proof of concept for feasibility of delivering high-dose IV hydroxocobalamin in septic shock.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03783091; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

The pharmacotherapeutic options in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock

INTRODUCTION

Septic and vasoplegic shock are common types of vasodilatory shock (VS) with high mortality. After fluid resuscitation and the use of catecholamine-mediated vasopressors (CMV), vasopressin, angiotensin II, methylene blue (MB) and hydroxocobalamin can be added to maintain blood pressure.

AREAS COVERED

VS treatment utilizes a phased approach with secondary vasopressors added to vasopressor agents to maintain an acceptable mean arterial pressure (MAP). This review covers additional vasopressors and adjunctive therapies used when fluid and catecholamine-mediated vasopressors fail to maintain target MAP.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence supporting additional vasopressor agents in catecholamine resistant VS is limited to case reports, series, and a few randomized control trials (RCTs) to guide recommendations. Vasopressin is the most common agent added next when MAPs are not adequately supported with CMV. VS patients failing fluids and vasopressors with cardiomyopathy may have cardiotonic agents such as dobutamine or milrinone added before or after vasopressin. Angiotensin II, another class of vasopressor is used in VS to maintain adequate MAP. MB and/or hydoxocobalamin, vitamin C, thiamine and corticosteroids are adjunctive therapies used in refractory VS. More RCTs are needed to confirm the utility of these drugs, at what doses, which combinations and in what order they should be given.

High-Dose Vitamin B12 in Vasodilatory Shock: A Narrative Review

Vasodilatory shock, as observed in postoperative states and sepsis, is hallmarked by low systemic vascular resistance and low blood pressure compensated by increased cardiac output. Gasotransmitters, such as nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide, are implicated in the development and perpetuation of vasodilatory shock. Established therapies do not target these physiologic drivers of vasodilation. Due to their nontoxic and pleotropic effects, micronutrients are being used as rescue therapy in postoperative vasoplegia and septic shock. Here, we outline the pathophysiology of vasodilatory shock, describe the rationale for vitamin B12 (hydroxocobalamin) in vasodilatory shock, and identify literature evaluating its use in vasoplegic states.