1
|
Roth EG, Chard S. Affective Practices of Diabetes Self-Management Among Older Adults: Cumulative Effects of Childhood Adversity. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2022; 62:568-576. [PMID: 34406388 PMCID: PMC9019651 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A strong correlation exists between Type 2 diabetes mellitus and adverse childhood experiences. How adverse childhood experiences inform later-life diabetes management is less understood. This article examines diabetes management from the perspective of affective practice to explore the lingering impact of trauma biographies in diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This secondary narrative analysis of 15 in-depth interviews with community-dwelling older adults with diabetes (subsample of the Subjective Experiences of Diabetes Study) focuses on the ways their reported childhood adversity affects perceptions of and responses to diabetes self-management. RESULTS The experiences of adversity in childhood accumulate, throughout the life course, in the affective practices informing diabetes self-management, from blood glucose testing, to food consumption, to the emotions invested in body size. We identify 3 thematic areas that emerged across participants: (a) undermining self-worth, (b) (over)eating and food as comfort, and (c) weight and body size. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Our findings highlight affective practices as a mechanism through which adverse events accumulate and shape well-being over the life course. This analysis also suggests the potential for (de)accumulation of affective practices to improve diabetes management. The findings support recent calls for trauma-informed clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin G Roth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Chard
- Center for Aging Studies, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Public Health, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lewis S, Willis K, Franklin M, Smith L. Challenging times: disconnects between patient and professional temporalities in chronic condition management. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2022.2046705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Lewis
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Willis
- Institute for Health & Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marika Franklin
- Centre for Workforce Futures, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lorraine Smith
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirby E, Kenny K, Broom A, Lwin Z. Chronicity in/and cancer: a qualitative interview study of health professionals, patients, and family carers. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2022.2035319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kirby
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Katherine Kenny
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alex Broom
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kenny K, Broom A, Page A, Prainsack B, Wakefield CE, Itchins M, Lwin Z, Khasraw M. A sociology of precision-in-practice: The affective and temporal complexities of everyday clinical care. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2021; 43:2178-2195. [PMID: 34843108 PMCID: PMC9299761 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The idea of 'precision medicine', which has gained increasing traction since the early 2000s, is now ubiquitous in health and medicine. Though varied in its implementation across fields, precision medicine has raised hopes of revolutionary treatments and has spurred the proliferation of novel therapeutics, the alteration of professional trajectories and various reconfigurations of health/care. Nowhere is the promise of precision medicine more apparent, nor further institutionalised, than in the field of oncology. While the transformative potential of precision medicine is widely taken for granted, there remains scant attention to how it is being experienced at the coalface of care. Here, drawing on the perspectives of 54 cancer care professionals gleaned through eight focus group discussions in two hospitals in Australia, we explore clinicians' experiences of the day-to-day dynamics of precision-in-practice. We illustrate some of the affective and temporal complexities, analysed here under the rubrics of enchantment, acceleration and distraction that are emerging alongside the uptake of precision medicine in the field of oncology. We argue that these complexities, and their dis/continuities with earlier iterations of cancer care, demonstrate the need for sociological analyses of precision medicine as it is being implemented in practice and its varied effects on 'routine' care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Kenny
- Sydney Centre for Healthy SocietiesSchool of Social and Political SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Sociology and Social PolicyFaculty of Arts and Social SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alex Broom
- Sydney Centre for Healthy SocietiesSchool of Social and Political SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Sociology and Social PolicyFaculty of Arts and Social SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alexander Page
- Sydney Centre for Healthy SocietiesSchool of Social and Political SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Sociology and Social PolicyFaculty of Arts and Social SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of Global Health & Social MedicineKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women’s and Children’s HealthUNSW Medicine and HealthUNSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences UnitKids Cancer CentreSydney Children’s HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Malinda Itchins
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Northern Cancer InstituteSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Medical OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Department of Medical OncologyRoyal Brisbane and Women’s HospitalHerstonQueenslandAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaQueenslandAustralia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor CenterDuke Center for Cancer ImmunotherapyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The social meanings of choice in living-with advanced breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114047. [PMID: 34090104 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Individual choice is valorised as a core social value; yet the necessity and desirability of making choices takes on new significance for people living with incurable cancer who are required to make often difficult decisions about treatment, care and family life, amidst considerable vulnerability and precariousness. There has been comparatively little exploration of how choice is negotiated and made meaningful under the spectre of incurability and a contracted future. In this paper, drawing on multiple qualitative interviews with 38 women with metastatic breast cancer, we explore how they experience and give meaning to choice in relation to their health (and beyond) in their daily lives. Our analysis highlights that while exercising choice was sometimes a concealed or silent pursuit, choice was always a socially negotiated and temporally unfolding process, nested within relational and interpersonal dynamics. Choices were also often constrained, even foreclosed, due to situational and relational dynamics. Yet even in the absence of choice, the idea of choice-as-control was discursively embraced by women. We argue that greater attention is needed to the affective, temporal and economic dimensions of choice, and how treatment decisions are asymmetrically structured when considered within the normative context of cancer.
Collapse
|
6
|
Broom A, Parker R, Raymond S, Kirby E, Lewis S, Kokanović R, Adams J, de Souza P, Woodland L, Wyld D, Lwin Z, Koh ES. The (Co)Production of Difference in the Care of Patients With Cancer From Migrant Backgrounds. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2020; 30:1619-1631. [PMID: 32564713 DOI: 10.1177/1049732320930699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
An extensive body of scholarship focuses on cultural diversity in health care, and this has resulted in a plethora of strategies to "manage" cultural difference. This work has often been patient-oriented (i.e., focused on the differences of the person being cared for), rather than relational in character. In this study, we aimed to explore how the difference was relational and coproduced in the accounts of cancer care professionals and patients with cancer who were from migrant backgrounds. Drawing on eight focus groups with 57 cancer care professionals and one-on-one interviews with 43 cancer patients from migrant backgrounds, we explore social relations, including intrusion and feelings of discomfort, moral logics of rights and obligation, and the practice of defaulting to difference. We argue, on the basis of these accounts, for the importance of approaching difference as relational and that this could lead to a more reflexive means for overcoming "differences" in therapeutic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Broom
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rhiannon Parker
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Emma Kirby
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sophie Lewis
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Renata Kokanović
- RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Adams
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul de Souza
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Woodland
- South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Forecasting survival in cancer is a particularly challenging facet of oncological work and can involve complex interactions with patients and their families. While there is considerable research on patient experiences of being provided with, or becoming aware of, their prognosis, there has been much less emphasis placed on the experiences of caregivers. The aim of this paper was to examine caregivers' experiences of prognosis. DESIGN This study used semistructured interviews; transcripts were analysed thematically using the framework approach. These data are part of a larger research project focused on experiences of cancer survivorship. SETTING Recruitment was from two metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS 50 caregivers of patients living with cancer and receiving treatment at two metropolitan hospitals (32% male, 68% female) participated in this study. RESULTS Four main themes were identified: (1) caregivers' uncertainty around the meaning and implications of prognosis, (2) caregivers' sense of exclusion in prognostic conversations, (3) the practice of situating prognosis within a context of hope and (4) the precarious balance between realism, optimism and strategic 'ignorance'. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers are in many respects the unseen third party of prognostic communication. Developing a better understanding of caregivers' perceptions of prognosis, including how this may be challenged, accepted or otherwise, is important in engaging caregivers in the process of communicating prognostic information. Facilitating greater participation by caregivers in prognostic conversations could potentially address evident complexities and even improve the experiences of all stakeholders in cancer care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Lewis
- Centre for Social Research in Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alex Broom
- School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine Kenny
- School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emma Kirby
- Centre for Social Research in Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Responses to a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative patient-centred interview study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:229-238. [PMID: 31020437 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04796-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A cancer diagnosis is an emotive and challenging time for patients. This study aimed to systematically explore patients' accounts of experiencing their cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to offer a typology of patient responses to receiving a cancer diagnosis as a means through which to affirm the range of patients' experiences and to guide clinicians' practice. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted between 2015 and 2017 with 80 patients living with cancer: 34 females and 46 males, aged between 31 and 85, diagnosed with a range of cancer types, stages and treatment trajectories, from two metropolitan hospitals on the east coast of Australia. Interview data were analysed thematically, using the framework approach. RESULTS A typology of responses to the cancer diagnosis was derived from the analysis and included (1) the incongruent diagnosis, unexpected because it did not 'fit' with the patient's 'healthy' identity; (2) the incidental diagnosis, arising from seemingly unrelated or minor medical investigations; (3) the validating diagnosis, as explanation and confirmation of previously unexplained symptoms, pain or feelings; (4) the life context diagnosis, where the cancer diagnosis was positioned relative to other challenging life events, or as relatively inconsequential compared with the hardship of others. CONCLUSIONS A diagnosis of cancer is not always (or only) experienced by patients with shock and despair. Diagnosis is perceived and experienced in diverse ways, shaped by broader social or life contexts, and with important implications for the clinical encounter and communication from an oncology perspective.
Collapse
|