Impact of infection on admission and of the process of care on mortality of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: the INFAUCI study

Impact of infection on healthcare costs and clinical outcomes in elderly hospitalized patients with multimorbidity

Background

Elderly patients with multimorbidity are at higher risk of greater healthcare costs and poor outcomes due to decreased physical function. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of infection on healthcare costs and poor outcomes in elderly hospitalized patients with multimorbidity.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 264 patients who met the inclusion criteria from the department of geriatrics of a large public hospital in Shanghai, China between January 2020 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had infection [infection present on admission (IPOA) or healthcare-associated infection(HAI)]. We recorded the basic information and follow-up information of all patients. The follow-up information included 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission and mortality. Then we analyzed the association between infection and healthcare costs and clinical outcomes.

Results

Among 264 subjects, 47.73 % of them achieved IPOA or HAI. The 30-day poor outcomes rate was 45.45 %, and the 1-year poor outcomes rate was 78.41 %. Compared with subjects without infection, the number of drugs and the disease burden were greater in subjects with infection(P < 0.001). Subjects with infection had longer length of hospital stay(P < 0.001) and had greater healthcare cost(P < 0.001). Moreover, subjects with infection had higher poor outcomes rates of 30-day and 1-year(P < 0.001). Infection could predict greater total cost [odds ratio (OR): 1.32, 95 % CI: 1.18,1.49,P < 0.001], nursing cost(OR: 11.45, 95 % CI: 3.49,37.63,P < 0.001), and medicine cost (OR: 2.37, 95 % CI: 1.70,3.31,P < 0.001). In addition, infection was also independently associated with the 30-day poor outcomes rate(OR:3.07, 95%CI: 1.80,5.24,P < 0.001), but we found no association between infection and 1-year poor outcomes rate(OR:1.43, 95 % CI:0.73,2.79,P = 0.300) after adjustment.

Conclusions

Infection was a risk factor for higher healthcare cost and 30-day poor outcome rate in elderly hospitalized patients with multimorbidity.

Critically ill patient mortality by age: long-term follow-up (CIMbA-LT)

BACKGROUND

The past years have witnessed dramatic changes in the population admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Older and sicker patients are now commonly treated in this setting due to the newly available sophisticated life support. However, the short- and long-term benefit of this strategy is scarcely studied.

METHODS

The Critically Ill patients' mortality by age: Long-Term follow-up (CIMbA-LT) was a multicentric, nationwide, retrospective, observational study addressing short- and long-term prognosis of patients admitted to Portuguese multipurpose ICUs, during 4 years, according to their age and disease severity. Patients were followed for two years after ICU admission. The standardized hospital mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated according to the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the follow-up risk, for patients discharged alive from the hospital, according to official demographic national data for age and gender. Survival curves were plotted according to age group.

RESULTS

We included 37.118 patients, including 15.8% over 80 years old. The mean SAPS II score was 42.8 ± 19.4. The ICU all-cause mortality was 16.1% and 76% of all patients survive until hospital discharge. The SAPS II score overestimated hospital mortality [SMR at hospital discharge 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.76] but accurately predicted one-year all-cause mortality [1-year SMR 1.01; (95% CI 0.98-1.08)]. Survival curves showed a peak in mortality, during the first 30 days, followed by a much slower survival decline thereafter. Older patients had higher short- and long-term mortality and their hospital SMR was also slightly higher (0.76 vs. 0.69). Patients discharged alive from the hospital had a 1-year relative mortality risk of 6.3; [95% CI 5.8-6.7]. This increased risk was higher for younger patients [21.1; (95% CI 15.1-39.6) vs. 2.4; (95% CI 2.2-2.7) for older patients].

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients' mortality peaked in the first 30 days after ICU admission. Older critically ill patients had higher all-cause mortality, including a higher hospital SMR. A long-term increased relative mortality risk was noted in patients discharged alive from the hospital, but this was more noticeable in younger patients.

What is the impact of previous cerebrovascular disease on critical COVID-19 patients' mortality? A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the effect of previous cerebrovascular disease (CVD) on mortality rates of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed between May/2020 and May/2021, at a tertiary-care-center. We consecutively included adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) having as primary diagnosis Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for >48 h. We considered as exposure the diagnosis of previous CVD and as main outcome the in-ICU mortality.

RESULTS

The study sample included 178 patients: 74.2% were males, with a mean age of 63 ± 12.4 years-old(yo). Previous CVD was documented in 17 patients (9.6%). During the study period, the mortality rate at ICU was of 33.1% (n = 59). The proportion of mortality at ICU was higher in patients with prior CVD (58.8% vs 30.4%; p = 0.02). Also, older patients (66 ± 11.4 yo vs. 62 ± 12.7 yo, p = 0.04) and those with higher score at SAPSII at ICU admission (47.8 ± 15.4 vs. 40.7 ± 15.9; p = 0.01) had a higher ICU deathrate. Patients with previous CVD had a 2.70 (95%CI = 1.36-5.39) higher likelihood of dying compared to those who had no previous CVD. After adjustment (for gender, age, SAPSII and total length of stay), multivariate Cox analysis revealed that previous CVD remained a strong predictor for in-ICU death in critically ill COVID-19 patients (HR = 2.51; 95%CI = 1.15-5.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous CVD was significantly associated to higher mortality in critical COVID-19 patients. We suggest that, in patients with previous CVD, prioritization of vaccination strategies should be implemented alongst with higher surveillance when infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Impact of age in critically Ill infected patients: a post-hoc analysis of the INFAUCI study

PURPOSE

Older patients are the fastest expanding subgroup of intensive care units (ICU) and are particularly susceptible to bacterial infections and sepsis. The aim of this study was to address the epidemiology and the main determinants of outcome of infection in old and very old patients admitted to ICU.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of all infected patients admitted to ICU enrolled in a 1-year prospective, observational, multipurpose study. Patients aged < 65, 65-74 and ≥ 75 years were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 1652 patients included, 50% were older than 65 years. There were no significant differences between young, old and very old patients in either ICU, hospital length of stay, or nosocomial infection. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in participants aged ≥ 75. Increased Gram-negative microorganisms' isolates occurred in > 65 years (25% versus 31%; p = 0.034). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms were directly associated to inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (OR 4.73; 95% CI 2.99-7.47) and inversely associated with community-acquired infection (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.83). Age (65-74 years: OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.64-1.90 and ≥ 75 years: OR 1.52; 95% CI 0.89-2.59) and sepsis severity (sepsis: OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.18-2.46; severe sepsis: OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.40-3.44; septic shock: OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.27-2.24) were not associated to MDR bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Patients > 65 years accounted for 50% of infected patients admitted to an ICU. ICU and hospital length of stay, and nosocomial infection did not increase with age. Age did predispose to increased risk for infection by Gram-negatives. These findings may optimize strategies for infection management in older patients.

Association between sepsis at ICU admission and mortality in patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia: An infectious second-hit model

PURPOSE

We explore the hypothesis that critically ill patients developing ICU-acquired pneumonia (ICU-AP) have worse outcomes and an altered inflammatory response if their ICU admission was sepsis-related.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study in two centers. Patients with ICU-AP were evaluated according to their previous exposure to sepsis at ICU-admission. Demographic variables, comorbidities, severity scores at admission and at the time of acquisition of ICU-AP, and serum biomarkers of the inflammatory response were evaluated.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

90-day mortality.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

ICU and hospital length of stay, mortality at days 28 and 180, in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days (day-28), and inflammatory response. Propensity scoring weighted the risk of previously-acquired sepsis. Multivariate analysis evaluated the risk of mortality by day-90. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the primary outcome in different subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 341 patients enrolled, 147 had sepsis on ICU-admission. Adjusted risk of mortality at 90 days did not differ overall [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94(CI:0.65-1.37)], nor in subpopulations with a confirmed etiology of pneumonia [HR = 0.93(CI:0.57-1.53)] or sepsis [HR = 0.91(0.54-1.55)], ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [HR = 1.01(CI:0.61-1.68)], nor non-VAP ICU-AP [HR = 0.83(CI:0.40-1.71)]. No differences were found in clinical secondary outcomes, the inflammatory response was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous sepsis does not appear to predispose to higher mortality nor worse outcomes in patients who develop ICU-acquired pneumonia.

Immune Response in Bacterial and Candida Sepsis

Sepsis leads to a systemic immune response, and despite the progress of modern medicine, it is still responsible for a high mortality rate. The immune response to sepsis is dependent on the innate and adaptive immune systems. The first line is the innate system, which requires complex and multiple pathways in order to eliminate the invading threats. The adaptive responses start after the innate response. The cell-mediated arm of CD4+ and CD8+ T and B cells is the main responsible for this response. A coordinated cytokine response is essential for the host immune response. A dysregulated response can lead to a hyperinflammatory condition (cytokine storm). This hyperinflammation leads to neutrophils activation and may also lead to organ dysfunction. An imbalance of this response can increase the anti-inflammatory response, leading to compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS), persistent inflammation-immunsupression, catabolism syndrome (PICS), and, above all, an immune paralysis stat. This immune paralysis leads to opportunistic infections, Candida species being one of the emerging microorganisms involved. The host immune response is different for bacterial or Candida sepsis. Immune responses for bacterial and Candida sepsis are described in this paper.

Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis, in which profound underlying abnormalities in circulatory and cellular/metabolic parameters lead to substantially increased mortality. A clear understanding and up-to-date assessment of the burden and epidemiology of septic shock are needed to help guide resource allocation and thus ultimately improve patient care. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore to provide a recent evaluation of the frequency of septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) and associated ICU and hospital mortality.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2005 to 20 February 2018 for observational studies that reported on the frequency and mortality of septic shock. Four reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved via consensus. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled frequency of septic shock diagnosed at admission and during the ICU stay and to estimate septic shock mortality in the ICU, hospital, and at 28 or 30 days.

Results

The literature search identified 6291 records of which 71 articles met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of septic shock was estimated at 10.4% (95% CI 5.9 to 16.1%) in studies reporting values for patients diagnosed at ICU admission and at 8.3% (95% CI 6.1 to 10.7%) in studies reporting values for patients diagnosed at any time during the ICU stay. ICU mortality was 37.3% (95% CI 31.5 to 43.5%), hospital mortality 39.0% (95% CI 34.4 to 43.9%), and 28-/30-day mortality 36.7% (95% CI 32.8 to 40.8%). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusions

Our literature review reaffirms the continued common occurrence of septic shock and estimates a high mortality of around 38%. The high level of heterogeneity observed in this review may be driven by variability in defining and applying the diagnostic criteria, as well as differences in treatment and care across settings and countries.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictors of successful discharge from intensive care units in older adults aged 80 years or older: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

We determined the long-term outcomes of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and investigated the predictors of successful discharge for ≥6 months among older adults aged ≥80 years in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the predictors of ICU admission in patients aged ≥80 years and the predictors of and optimal cutoff predictive discharge score (PDS) for ICU successful discharge in patients aged ≥80 years.

DESIGN

A population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Medical records of 282,269 individuals aged ≥80 years collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2001 to 2013.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical parameters, Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI), hospital type, and post-discharge outcomes of ICU patients aged ≥80 years were obtained from their medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze and identify the predictors of successful discharge and treatments received by critically ill patients aged ≥80 years admitted to the ICU. The optimal cutoff PDS for successful discharge in older adults were calculated by Youden Index. Results 65,756 ICU admissions were documented, of which 21% (n = 13,825) were for adults aged ≥80 years. The successful discharge rate among ICU patients aged ≥80 years (57.2%) was significantly lower than that among those aged 18-64 and 65-79 years (81.7% and 71.5%, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed the following predictors of successful discharge for ≥6 months after ICU admission in adults aged ≥80 years: younger age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94-0.96), shorter ICU length of stay (adjusted OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88-0.92), lower CCI (adjusted OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.90-0.93), and no life-sustaining treatments received (Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: adjusted OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.68-0.84; mechanical ventilation: adjusted OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.57-0.71; use of inotropic agents: adjusted OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.34-0.41). The optimal cutoff PDS in older adults was 6 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.72-0.74).

CONCLUSION

This is the first population-based study investigating the post-discharge outcomes of ICU patients aged ≥80 years. Advanced age was a predictive factor of unsuccessful discharge from the ICU. Nevertheless, more than half of this vulnerable population survived for at least 6 months after discharge. Therefore, age should not be the sole criterion when considering ICU admission and deciding curative treatments for critically ill older adults. Comprehensive assessment and effective communication with patients and their families are also crucial in clinical decision-making for critically ill older adults.

Impact of antibiotic therapy in severe community-acquired pneumonia: Data from the Infauci study

Antibiotic therapy (AT) is the cornerstone of the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, the best treatment strategy is far from being established. To evaluate the impact of different aspects of AT on the outcome of critically ill patients with CAP, we performed a post hoc analysis of all CAP patients enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicentre study. Of the 502 patients included, 76% received combination therapy, mainly a β-lactam with a macrolide (80%). AT was inappropriate in 16% of all microbiologically documented CAP (n=177). Hospital and 6months mortality were 34% and 35%. In adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis, combination AT with a macrolide was independently associated with a reduction in hospital (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.06-0.51) and 6months (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.07-0.57) mortality. Prolonged AT (>7days) was associated with a longer ICU (14 vs. 7days; p<0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (25 vs. 17days; p<0.001). Combination AT with a macrolide may be the most suitable AT strategy to improve both short and long term outcome of severe CAP patients. AT >7days had no survival benefit and was associated with a longer LOS.

Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

IMPORTANCE

Septic shock currently refers to a state of acute circulatory failure associated with infection. Emerging biological insights and reported variation in epidemiology challenge the validity of this definition.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new definition and clinical criteria for identifying septic shock in adults.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine convened a task force (19 participants) to revise current sepsis/septic shock definitions. Three sets of studies were conducted: (1) a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in adults published between January 1, 1992, and December 25, 2015, to determine clinical criteria currently reported to identify septic shock and inform the Delphi process; (2) a Delphi study among the task force comprising 3 surveys and discussions of results from the systematic review, surveys, and cohort studies to achieve consensus on a new septic shock definition and clinical criteria; and (3) cohort studies to test variables identified by the Delphi process using Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) (2005-2010; n = 28,150), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) (2010-2012; n = 1,309,025), and Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) (2009-2013; n = 1,847,165) electronic health record (EHR) data sets.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Evidence for and agreement on septic shock definitions and criteria.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 44 studies reporting septic shock outcomes (total of 166,479 patients) from a total of 92 sepsis epidemiology studies reporting different cutoffs and combinations for blood pressure (BP), fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, serum lactate level, and base deficit to identify septic shock. The septic shock-associated crude mortality was 46.5% (95% CI, 42.7%-50.3%), with significant between-study statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 99.5%; τ2 = 182.5; P < .001). The Delphi process identified hypotension, serum lactate level, and vasopressor therapy as variables to test using cohort studies. Based on these 3 variables alone or in combination, 6 patient groups were generated. Examination of the SSC database demonstrated that the patient group requiring vasopressors to maintain mean BP 65 mm Hg or greater and having a serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) after fluid resuscitation had a significantly higher mortality (42.3% [95% CI, 41.2%-43.3%]) in risk-adjusted comparisons with the other 5 groups derived using either serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L alone or combinations of hypotension, vasopressors, and serum lactate level 2 mmol/L or lower. These findings were validated in the UPMC and KPNC data sets.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Based on a consensus process using results from a systematic review, surveys, and cohort studies, septic shock is defined as a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than sepsis alone. Adult patients with septic shock can be identified using the clinical criteria of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy to maintain mean BP 65 mm Hg or greater and having a serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L after adequate fluid resuscitation.

Preventive and therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients with highly resistant bacteria

The antibiotic pipeline continues to diminish and the majority of the public remains unaware of this critical situation. The cause of the decline of antibiotic development is multifactorial and currently most ICUs are confronted with the challenge of multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrobial multidrug resistance is expanding all over the world, with extreme and pandrug resistance being increasingly encountered, especially in healthcare-associated infections in large highly specialized hospitals. Antibiotic stewardship for critically ill patients translated into the implementation of specific guidelines, largely promoted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, targeted at education to optimize choice, dosage, and duration of antibiotics in order to improve outcomes and reduce the development of resistance. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, meaning the selection of an antibiotic to which the causative pathogen is resistant, is a consistent predictor of poor outcomes in septic patients. Therefore, pharmacokinetically/pharmacodynamically optimized dosing regimens should be given to all patients empirically and, once the pathogen and susceptibility are known, local stewardship practices may be employed on the basis of clinical response to redefine an appropriate regimen for the patient. This review will focus on the most severely ill patients, for whom substantial progress in organ support along with diagnostic and therapeutic strategies markedly increased the risk of nosocomial infections.

Decreasing the time to achieve therapeutic vancomycin concentrations in critically ill patients: developing and testing of a dosing nomogram

INTRODUCTION

Achievement of optimal vancomycin exposure is crucial to improve the management of patients with life-threatening infections caused by susceptible Gram-positive bacteria and is of particular concern in patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). The aim of this study was to develop a dosing nomogram for the administration of vancomycin by continuous infusion for the first 24 hours of therapy based on the measured urinary creatinine clearance (8 h CLCR).

METHODS

This single-center study included all critically ill patients treated with vancomycin over a 13-month period (group 1), in which we retrospectively assessed the correlation between vancomycin clearance and 8 h CLCR. This data was used to develop a formula for optimised drug dosing. The efficiency of this formula was prospectively evaluated in a second cohort of 25 consecutive critically ill patients (group 2). Vancomycin serum concentrations between 20 to 30 mg/L were considered adequate. ARC was defined as 8 h CLCR more than 130 ml/min/1.73 m(2).

RESULTS

The incidence of ARC was 36% (n = 29/79) and 40% (10/25) in group 1 (n = 79) and 2 (n = 25), respectively. The mean serum vancomycin concentration on day 1 was 21.5 (6.4) and 24.5 (5.2) mg/L, for both groups respectively. On the treatment day, vancomycin plasma clearance was 5.12 (1.9) L/h in group 1 and correlated significantly with the 8 h CLCR (r(2) = 0.66; P < 0.001). The achievement of adequate vancomycin serum concentrations in group 2 was 84% (n = 21/25) versus 51% (n = 40/79) - P < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

This new vancomycin nomogram enabled the achievement of adequate serum concentrations in 84% of the patients on the first day of treatment.

Invasive candidiasis in critical care setting, updated recommendations from “Invasive Fungal Infections-Clinical Forum”, Iran

Invasive candidiasis (IC) bears a high risk of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care units (ICU). With the current advances in critical care and the use of wide-spectrum antibiotics, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and IC in particular, have turned into a growing concern in the ICU. Further to blood cultures, some auxiliary laboratory tests and biomarkers are developed to enable an earlier detection of infection, however these test are neither consistently available nor validated in our setting. On the other hand, patients’ clinical status and local epidemiology data may justify the empiric antifungal approach using the proper antifungal option. The clinical approach to the management of IC in febrile, non-neutropenic critically ill patients has been defined in available international guidelines; nevertheless such recommendations need to be customized when applied to our local practice. Over the past three years, Iranian experts from intensive care and infectious diseases disciplines have tried to draw a consensus on the management of IFI with a particular focus on IC in the ICU. The established IFI-clinical forum (IFI-CF), comprising the scientific leaders in the field, has recently come up with and updated recommendation on the same (June 2014). The purpose of this review is to put together literature insights and Iranian experts’ opinion at the IFI-CF, to propose an updated practical overview on recommended approaches for the management of IC in the ICU.