1
|
Hjorth NE, Hufthammer KO, Sigurdardottir K, Tripodoro VA, Goldraij G, Kvikstad A, Haugen DF. Hospital care for the dying patient with cancer: does an advance care planning invitation influence bereaved relatives' experiences? A two country survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e1038-e1047. [PMID: 34848559 PMCID: PMC10850660 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advance care planning (ACP) is not systematically performed in Argentina or Norway. We used the post-bereavement survey of the ERANet-LAC International Care Of the Dying Evaluation (CODE) project (2017-2020) to examine the proportion of relatives who were offered an ACP conversation, the proportion of those not offered it who would have wanted it and whether the outcomes differed between those offered a conversation and those not. METHODS Relatives after cancer deaths in hospitals answered the CODE questionnaire 6-8 weeks post bereavement, by post (Norway) or interview (Argentina). Two additional questions asked if the relative and patient had been invited to a conversation about wishes for the patient's remaining lifetime, and, if not invited, whether they would have wanted such a conversation. The data were analysed using mixed-effects ordinal regression models. RESULTS 276 participants (Argentina 98 and Norway 178) responded (56% spouses, 31% children, 68% women, age 18-80+). Fifty-six per cent had been invited, and they had significantly more positive perceptions about care and support than those not invited. Sixty-eight per cent of the participants not invited would have wanted an invitation, and they had less favourable perceptions about the care, especially concerning emotional and spiritual support. CONCLUSIONS Relatives who had been invited to a conversation about wishes for the patient's remaining lifetime had more positive perceptions about patient care and support for the relatives in the patient's final days of life. A majority of the relatives who had not been invited to an ACP conversation would have wanted it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Elisabeth Hjorth
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Specialist Palliative Care Team, Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Services, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Katrin Sigurdardottir
- Specialist Palliative Care Team, Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Services, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Vilma Adriana Tripodoro
- Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas Alfredo Lanari, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriel Goldraij
- Internal Medicine/Palliative Care Program, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Anne Kvikstad
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Palliative Medicine Unit, Cancer Clinic, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roydhouse J, Reeve BB. Incorporating Information From Proxies for Patient-Centered Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Oncology Settings. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1518-1522. [PMID: 36269934 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Roydhouse
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.,Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roydhouse J, Gutman R, Teno JM. The potential impact of proxy reports for symptom experience and care quality and experience in advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 2023:1-9. [PMID: 36604818 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951522001729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As the US tests models of care for the seriously ill, patient perceptions of the quality of care are important. Proxies are often needed for this group. We sought to understand the potential impact of proxy reports for the assessment of care quality and experience in cancer. METHODS Secondary data analysis of a deidentified prospective study that included surveys of perceived care quality, including symptom management, from patients with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers. Surveys were administered at diagnosis (time 1) and treatment (time 2), with top-box scoring used for analysis. Overall concordance was assessed using metrics including Gwet's AC1. The proportion of the highest scores by respondent type within 2 subgroups were examined: (1) symptom burden and (2) practice setting. RESULTS Data from 83 dyads were analyzed. Proxies and patients frequently reported the highest scores for quality (time 1: proxies: 77% and patients: 80%). At time 1, 14% of proxies and 10% of patients reported an unmet need for symptom palliation. Most patients reporting an unmet need gave the top score for quality (75%), but fewer proxies did so (45%). Proxy and patient reports were similar within practice settings. Concordance was at least moderate (nearly all outcomes >0.5 and some >0.8) by Gwet's AC1. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Findings of at least moderate concordance and similar experience outcomes within subgroups suggest the use of proxies may not change estimates substantially. However, consideration should be taken when evaluating symptom management, particularly if such evaluations inform assessment of provider performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Roydhouse
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Roee Gutman
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joan M Teno
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu RH, Dong D. Patient-Proxy Agreement Regarding Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors with Lymphoma: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030607. [PMID: 35158875 PMCID: PMC8833321 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To assess the difference between lymphoma survivors' self- and proxy-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its association with socioeconomic and health statuses. Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from a nationwide cross-sectional online survey in 2019. Information about participants' demographics, health status and HRQoL were collected. The propensity-score matching (PSM) method was used to control the effect of potential confounders on selection bias. A chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between HRQoL and response type adjusted to respondents' background characteristics. Results: Out of the total 4400 participants, data of 2350 ones were elicited for analysis after PSM process. Patients' self-reported outcomes indicated a slightly better physical, role and emotional functioning than proxy-reported outcomes. Regression analysis showed that patients, who were older, unemployed, and who received surgery, were more likely to report a lower HRQoL. Further analysis demonstrated that proxy-reported patients who had completed treatment were more likely to report a higher HRQoL than those who were being treated. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the agreement between self- and proxy-reported HRQoL is low in patients with lymphoma and the heterogeneities of HRQoL among patients with different types of aggressive NHL (Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) is large. Differences in self- and proxy-reported HRQoL should be considered by oncologists when selecting and deciding the optimal care plan for lymphoma survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Huan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China;
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Dong Dong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518000, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calvert M, King M, Mercieca-Bebber R, Aiyegbusi O, Kyte D, Slade A, Chan AW, Basch E, Bell J, Bennett A, Bhatnagar V, Blazeby J, Bottomley A, Brown J, Brundage M, Campbell L, Cappelleri JC, Draper H, Dueck AC, Ells C, Frank L, Golub RM, Griebsch I, Haywood K, Hunn A, King-Kallimanis B, Martin L, Mitchell S, Morel T, Nelson L, Norquist J, O'Connor D, Palmer M, Patrick D, Price G, Regnault A, Retzer A, Revicki D, Scott J, Stephens R, Turner G, Valakas A, Velikova G, von Hildebrand M, Walker A, Wenzel L. SPIRIT-PRO Extension explanation and elaboration: guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in protocols of clinical trials. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045105. [PMID: 34193486 PMCID: PMC8246371 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to provide valuable evidence on the impact of disease and treatment on patients' symptoms, function and quality of life. High-quality PRO data from trials can inform shared decision-making, regulatory and economic analyses and health policy. Recent evidence suggests the PRO content of past trial protocols was often incomplete or unclear, leading to research waste. To address this issue, international, consensus-based, PRO-specific guidelines were developed: the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT)-PRO Extension. The SPIRIT-PRO Extension is a 16-item checklist which aims to improve the content and quality of aspects of clinical trial protocols relating to PRO data collection to minimise research waste, and ultimately better inform patient-centred care. This SPIRIT-PRO explanation and elaboration (E&E) paper provides information to promote understanding and facilitate uptake of the recommended checklist items, including a comprehensive protocol template. For each SPIRIT-PRO item, we provide a detailed description, one or more examples from existing trial protocols and supporting empirical evidence of the item's importance. We recommend this paper and protocol template be used alongside the SPIRIT 2013 and SPIRIT-PRO Extension paper to optimise the transparent development and review of trial protocols with PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Madeleine King
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olalekan Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham, UK
| | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anita Slade
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Women's College Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - E Basch
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jill Bell
- Oncology Digital Health, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Antonia Bennett
- Cancer Outcomes Research Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jane Blazeby
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- Department of Quality of Life, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Brundage
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Campbell
- Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Joseph C Cappelleri
- Global Biometrics & Data Management-Statistics, Pfizer Inc, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | - Amylou C Dueck
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Carolyn Ells
- School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lori Frank
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Kirstie Haywood
- Warwick Research in Nursing, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Morel
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Linda Nelson
- Value Evidence and Outcomes-Patient Centered Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Josephine Norquist
- Center for Observational Real-world Evidence (CORE), Patient-Centered Endpoints & Strategy, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | - Daniel O'Connor
- Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Michael Palmer
- Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donald Patrick
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gary Price
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ameeta Retzer
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jane Scott
- Johnson and Johnson, Janssen Global Services LLC, High Wycombe, UK
| | | | - Grace Turner
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - Antonia Valakas
- EMD Serono Inc, Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria von Hildebrand
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anita Walker
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lari Wenzel
- University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patient experiences with general practice in Norway: a comparison of immigrant groups and the majority population following a national survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1106. [PMID: 33256725 PMCID: PMC7708102 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05963-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient experience is an important indicator of quality of health care. In Norway, little is known about the quality of health care for immigrants. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported experiences with general practice between the Norwegian-born population and immigrant groups. Methods We performed secondary analyses of data from a national survey on patient experiences with general practice, including assessments of general practitioners (GPs) and their GP offices. The survey was carried out in Norway in 2018–19. The total number of respondents was 2029, with a response rate of 42.6%. Region of birth was available for 1981 participants, and these were included in the analyses (“Norway” (N = 1756), “Asia, Africa or South America” (N = 95), “Eastern Europe” (N = 70) and “Western Europe, North America or Oceania” (N = 60)). Five indicators of patient experiences were used as dependent variables in bivariate and multivariate analyses, with region of birth as the main exposure variable and other background variables about the patient as adjustment variables: “the GP” (measures related to communication and competency), “auxiliary staff” (politeness, competency, organization), “accessibility” (waiting times), “coordination” (with other services) and `enablement` (GP facilitates coping with/understanding illness). Results Immigrants as a whole reported poorer experiences with general practice than the majority population, with significantly poorer scores on four of five patient experience indicators. Patients from Asia/Africa/South America reported poorer experiences than those from Norway on the indicators “GP”, “auxiliary staff”, “accessibility” and “coordination”: on a scale from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best, the difference ranged from 7.8 (GP) to 20.3 (accessibility). Patients from Eastern Europe reported lower scores on “GP” and patients from Western Europe/North America/Oceania reported lower scores on “auxiliary staff”. These associations were still significant after adjustment for sex, age, self-rated physical and mental health, number of contacts with the GP and education. Conclusions For countries with a substantial proportion of foreign-born patients in the health system, immigrant background is an important parameter in quality improvement work. Immigrant background is also an important parameter in health service research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05963-3.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vennedey V, Peltzer S, Shukri A, Müller H, Jessen F, Albus C, Stock S. Comparison of Patient and Proxy Assessment of Patient-Centeredness in the Care of Coronary Heart Disease: A Cross Sectional Survey Using the PACIC-S11.1. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11:2150132720976235. [PMID: 33225798 PMCID: PMC7686633 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720976235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: When making medical care more patient-centered, surveys on patients’ and
their relatives’ experiences can be helpful in identifying opportunities for
improvement. In cases where the targeted patients are unable to express
their own perspective, for example, due to them being too young or suffering
from severe impairments, proxies can serve as substitutes. Proxies are
frequently used in care planning and consent. Nevertheless, it is unclear
whether patients’ assessments of how patient-centered their medical care is
are similar to those of their proxies. This study aims to assess the level
of consistency between patients’ and their proxies’ assessments using an
adapted version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)
short form questionnaire. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, patients with coronary heart disease were
recruited at cardiologists’ offices, rehabilitation clinics and hospitals.
Participants were surveyed with regard to the perceived level of
patient-centeredness during their care using an adapted version of the
German PACIC short form (PACIC-S11.1). Correlations in the assessments made
by each patient and their respective proxy were analyzed. On the level of
the patients group and the relatives group differences between mean ratings
for each item were compared using paired t-tests. Results: In total, 74 pairs of patients and proxies submitted the completed
questionnaire. On the level of the individual patient/proxy pairs, no
correlation, or significant but low correlation, was found between the
ratings. On the group level, patients’ and their proxies’ item ratings were
similar in the interpretation of averages, but still demonstrated
statistically significant differences. Overall, patients rated their care as
more patient-centered than their proxies did. Conclusion: The study shows that, on the individual level, proxies’ ratings do not
necessarily reflect the patients’ assessment of PCC. On the group level, the
assessments of relatives regarding PCC are similar to those of the
patients. Trial registration German clinical trials register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, DRKS)
Registration Number: DRKS00012434 (URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012434)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Vennedey
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Samia Peltzer
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arim Shukri
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hendrik Müller
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Albus
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lentz TA, Harman JS, Marlow NM, Beneciuk JM, Fillingim RB, George SZ. Factors associated with persistently high-cost health care utilization for musculoskeletal pain. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225125. [PMID: 31710655 PMCID: PMC6844454 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal pain conditions incur high costs and produce significant personal and public health consequences, including disability and opioid-related mortality. Persistence of high-cost health care utilization for musculoskeletal pain may help identify system inefficiencies that could limit value of care. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with persistent high-cost utilization among individuals seeking health care for musculoskeletal pain. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2008-2013) that included a non-institutionalized, population-based sample of individuals seeking health care for a musculoskeletal pain condition (n = 12,985). Expenditures associated with musculoskeletal pain conditions over two consecutive years were analyzed from prescribed medicine, office-based medical provider visits, outpatient department visits, emergency room visits, inpatient hospital stays, and home health visits. Persistent high-cost utilization was defined as being in the top 15th percentile for annual musculoskeletal pain-related expenditures over 2 consecutive years. We used multinomial regression to determine which modifiable and non-modifiable sociodemographic, health, and pain-related variables were associated with persistent high-cost utilization. RESULTS Approximately 35% of direct costs for musculoskeletal pain were concentrated among the 4% defined as persistent high-cost utilizers. Non-modifiable variables associated with expenditure group classification included age, race, poverty level, geographic region, insurance status, diagnosis type and total number of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. Modifiable variables associated with increased risk of high expenditure classification were higher number of missed work days, greater pain interference, and higher use of prescription medication for pain, while higher self-reported physical and mental health were associated with lower risk of high expenditure classification. CONCLUSIONS Health care delivery models that prospectively identify these potentially modifiable factors may improve the costs and value of care for individuals with musculoskeletal pain prone to risk for high-cost care episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor A. Lentz
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jeffrey S. Harman
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America
| | - Nicole M. Marlow
- Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Jason M. Beneciuk
- Brooks Rehabilitation – College of Public Health & Health Professions Research Collaboration, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Roger B. Fillingim
- Pain Research & Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Steven Z. George
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|