Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains

Assessment of the efficiency of DNA isolation and profiling applying a temperature-driven method in human remains

The identification of human remains is of utmost importance in a variety of scenarios. One of the primary identification methods is DNA. DNA extraction from human remains could be difficult, particularly in situations where the remains have been exposed to environmental conditions and other insults. Several studies tried to improve extraction by applying different approaches. ForensicGEM Universal (MicroGem) is a single-tube approach to DNA extraction and a temperature-driven method that could have some advantages with respect to previous techniques, among them, reducing the risk of contamination, not requiring specialized equipment, or several steps to perform. The aim of this study was to assess, for the first time, the efficiency of DNA extraction and quality of STR profiles applying the MicroGem protocol and modifications of this protocol from tooth samples in comparison with automatic extraction (AE). Our results indicated that AE and MicroGem performed similar, though with variability depending on the MicroGem modifications, increasing the DNA yield and STR profile quality when DNA is concentrated with Microcon. These findings demonstrated the efficiency of this methodology for DNA extraction from human remains while also providing a simple and quick technique suitable to apply in a variety of forensic scenarios.

Collection and storage of DVI samples with microFLOQ® Direct swabs for direct amplification

The rapid identification of decomposing human remains is a crucial component of disaster victim identification (DVI), often occurring in remote areas without access to laboratory or storage facilities. Due to the ease of collection and amenability to storage in harsh conditions, swabs may be used to collect DNA from decomposing remains as an alternative to sampling tissue or bone. Direct amplification could further streamline the process and reduce costs. This study investigated the efficacy of direct amplification of DVI samples using microFLOQ® Direct swabs and the QIAGEN Investigator QS GO! Kit. A comparison of performance between direct amplification and traditional methods was made to assess whether direct amplification offered an improvement to traditional methods. DNA was collected by swabbing the muscle of a decomposing human cadaver using three swab types (ADS Genetics 4N6FLOQSwabs®, NADS Genetics 4N6FLOQSwabs®, and the microFLOQ® Direct swab). Traditional swabs (4N6FLOQSwabs®) were extracted and quantified, while a direct amplification strategy was used with the microFLOQ® Direct swabs coupled with the Investigator 24Plex GO! Kit. Processing of the microFLOQ® Direct swabs were optimized and a hybrid strategy that used 4N6FLOQSwabs® to collect and store DNA before swabbing or "subsampling" the 4N6FLOQSwabs® for processing with microFLOQ® Direct swabs was developed. This hybrid strategy allowed for rapid processing without the consumption of the original sample. Traditional and direct PCR methods were comparable up to day 10 of decomposition depending on the sample location and for up to 3 months of storage at room temperature. This research indicated that microFLOQ® Direct swabs in conjunction with the Investigator 24Plex GO! Kit can be used to facilitate rapid direct processing of DNA from decomposing human remains.

Large fragment demineralization: an alternative pretreatment for forensic DNA typing of bones

In forensic genetics, the analysis of postmortem bones is one of the most challenging due to the low quantity of degraded endogenous DNA. The most widely used approach for sample preparation, in those cases, is pulverizing the bone. However, processing pulverized bone is extremely delicate, requiring strict laboratory conditions and operating procedures. In fact, several recent publications have focused on non-powder approaches. The objectives of this study were, thus, to validate a non-powder protocol for DNA extraction from forensic bones and an alternative pretreatment, large fragment demineralization (LFD). Thirty human femurs and tibiae received by the Legal Medicine Institute of Brescia, Italy, were included in the study. Bone powder and one transversal section of the diaphysis were sampled from each bone. DNA extraction from the powder was carried out using PrepFiler BTA (BTA), while the transversal section was submitted to the alternative demineralizing pretreatment (LFD) followed by DNA extraction using the QIAamp DNA Investigator. DNA extracts were assessed for human DNA quantity and degradation by means of a validated in-house qPCR assay and amplified with commercial kits. Inhibition assessment was carried out through Quality Sensor analysis using 24plex QS Kit. The differences in quantity, quality of human DNA, and number of alleles detected between both methods were comparable and not statistically significant. We propose the use of the LFD protocol as a complementary approach capable of confirming the genotypes or detect alleles not observed using BTA, without the need for pulverization.

Fragment analysis in forensic anthropology

Anthropological analysis of fragmentary evidence can be challenging but diverse methods allow substantial information to be gleaned. Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy enables determination if bone and/or tooth tissue is present. Protein radioimmunoassay or DNA analysis can establish the species present. Histological analysis can assist in species determination and reveal information about thermal changes. Radiocarbon analysis with special reference to the modern bomb-curve can clarify the postmortem interval. Anthropologists should also be aware that DNA analysis not only can enable positive identification but assist in the evaluation of sex and age at death.

Human DNA extraction from highly degraded skeletal remains: How to find a suitable method?

Retrieving DNA from highly degraded human skeletal remains is still a challenge due to low concentration and fragmentation, which makes it difficult to extract and purify. Recent works showed that silica-based methods allow better DNA recovery and this fact may be attributed to the type of bones and the quality of the preserved tissue. However, more systematic studies are needed to evaluate the efficiency of the different silica-based extraction methods considering the type of bones. The main goal of the present study is to establish the best extraction method and the type of bone that can maximize the recovery of PCR-amplifiable DNA and the subsequent retrieval of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic information. Five individuals were selected from an archaeological site located in Catalonia-Spain dating from 5th to 11th centuries AD. For each individual, five samples from different skeletal regions were collected: petrous bone, pulp cavity and cementum of tooth, and rib and limb bones. Four extraction methods were tested, three silica-based (silica in-suspension, HE column and XS plasma column) and the classical method based on phenol-chloroform. Silica in-suspension method from petrous bone and pulp cavity showed the best results. However, the remains preservation will ultimately be the key to the molecular result success.

A Powder-free DNA Extraction Workflow for Skeletal Samples

The processing of skeletal material poses several challenges for forensic laboratories. Current methods can be laborious, time-consuming, require dedicated equipment, and are vulnerable to contamination. In this study, various sample mass (1 × 50 mg, 3 × 50 mg, and 1 × 150 mg chip(s)) and incubation times (2, 4, and 16 h) were tested using the PrepFiler^® BTA™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit to digest whole bone chips in lieu of powdering. The most effective method was then applied to bones and tooth fragments collected from contemporary human cadavers exposed to various environmental conditions using an automated platform. Over a third of the samples tested generated full DNA profiles without having to powder the bone/tooth fragment or further alter the manufacturer's protocol. However, for most samples resulting in incomplete STR profiles due to low amounts of DNA, slightly better results were achieved with powdered tissue. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential use of a faster, nonpowdering DNA extraction method for processing skeletal samples as an effective first-pass screening tool.