1
|
Dodd A, Turner PJ, Soar J, Savic L. Emergency treatment of peri-operative anaphylaxis: Resuscitation Council UK algorithm for anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:535-541. [PMID: 38205901 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Peri-operative anaphylaxis is a rare but potentially catastrophic event which must be considered whenever unexpected and significant cardiovascular or respiratory compromise occurs during anaesthesia. The Resuscitation Council UK algorithm for peri-operative anaphylaxis highlights the importance of early intravenous adrenaline and fluid resuscitation and provides guidance on the treatment of refractory anaphylaxis and immediate follow-up. This algorithm is endorsed by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, Association of Anaesthetists, British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and Clinical Immunology Professional Network of the British Society for Immunology. This document was produced by the Perioperative Allergy Network steering committee in collaboration with the Resuscitation Council UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dodd
- Department of Anaesthesia, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - P J Turner
- Department of Paediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - J Soar
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - L Savic
- Department of Anaesthesia, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ensina LF, Min TK, Félix MMR, de Alcântara CT, Costa C. Acute Urticaria and Anaphylaxis: Differences and Similarities in Clinical Management. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:840999. [PMID: 35958944 PMCID: PMC9361476 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.840999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute urticaria is a common condition that presents with wheals and/or angioedema. However, these symptoms are also frequent in anaphylaxis, a life-threatening reaction that should be immediately diagnosed and treated. In both, mast cells play a central role in the physiopathology. Causes and triggers of acute urticaria and anaphylaxis are similar in general, but some peculiarities can be observed. The diagnostic approach may differ, accordingly to the condition, suspicious causes, age groups and regions. Adrenaline is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, but not for acute urticaria, where H1-antihistamines are the first choice. In this paper, we review the main aspects, similarities and differences regarding definitions, mechanisms, causes, diagnosis and treatment of acute urticaria and anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Felipe Ensina
- Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Luis Felipe Ensina
| | - Taek Ki Min
- Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mara Morelo Rocha Félix
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Célia Costa
- Immunoallergology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Norte (CHLN), EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaudio FG, Johnson DE, DiLorenzo K, Anderson A, Musi M, Schimelpfenig T, Leemon D, Blair-Smith C, Lemery J. Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Anaphylaxis. Wilderness Environ Med 2022; 33:75-91. [PMID: 35120856 DOI: 10.1016/j.wem.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review the literature and develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of anaphylaxis, with an emphasis on a field-based perspective. The review also included literature regarding the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of anaphylaxis. The increasing prevalence of food allergies in the United States raises concern for a corresponding rise in the incidence of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular epinephrine is the primary treatment for anaphylaxis and should be administered before adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, and inhaled β agonists. For outdoor schools and organizations, selecting a method to administer epinephrine in the field is based on considerations of cost, safety, and first responder training, as well as federal guidelines and state-specific laws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio G Gaudio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
| | | | - Kelly DiLorenzo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Arian Anderson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Martin Musi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Drew Leemon
- National Outdoor Leadership School, Lander, WY
| | | | - Jay Lemery
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The key to managing anaphylaxis is early epinephrine administration. This can improve outcomes and prevent progression to severe and fatal anaphylaxis. Delayed or lack of administration of epinephrine is associated with fatal reactions. Positioning in a recumbent supine position, airway management, and intravenous fluids are essential in its management. Antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids should not be prescribed in place of epinephrine. β-adrenergic agonists by inhalation are indicated for bronchospasm associated with anaphylaxis despite optimal epinephrine treatment. Long-term management of anaphylaxis includes the identification and avoidance of triggers; identification of cofactors, such as mast cell disorders; patient, parent, and caregiver education, and interventions to reduce allergen sensitivity, such as the use of venom immunotherapy for Hymenoptera hypersensitivity. Long-term management is covered in other articles. Consultation with an allergist/immunologist is recommended when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aishwarya Navalpakam
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, 3950 Beaubien Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Narin Thanaputkaiporn
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, 3950 Beaubien Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Pavadee Poowuttikul
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, 3950 Beaubien Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Testa B, Pawson P, Bell A. A suspected non‐allergic anaphylactic reaction to intravenous administration of atracurium in a dog. VETERINARY RECORD CASE REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Testa
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital Glasgow UK
| | - Pat Pawson
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital Glasgow UK
| | - Andrew Bell
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital Glasgow UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dodd A, Hughes A, Sargant N, Whyte AF, Soar J, Turner PJ. Evidence update for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Resuscitation 2021; 163:86-96. [PMID: 33895231 PMCID: PMC8139870 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Resuscitation Council UK has updated its Guideline for healthcare providers on the Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis. As part of this process, an evidence review was undertaken by the Guideline Working Group, using an internationally-accepted approach for adoption, adaptation, and de novo guideline development based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) framework, referred to as GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. A number of significant changes have been made, which will be reflected in the updated Guideline. These include: emphasis on repeating intramuscular adrenaline doses after 5 min if symptoms of anaphylaxis do not resolve; corticosteroids (e.g. hydrocortisone) no longer being routinely recommended for the emergency treatment of anaphylaxis; interventions for reactions which are refractory to initial treatment with adrenaline; a recommendation against the use of antihistamines for the acute management of anaphylaxis; and guidance relating to the duration of observation following anaphylaxis, and timing of discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal Y, Fernandez Rivas M, Fineman S, Geller M, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Greenberger PA, Sanchez Borges M, Senna G, Sheikh A, Tanno LK, Thong BY, Turner PJ, Worm M. World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100472. [PMID: 33204386 PMCID: PMC7607509 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 407] [Impact Index Per Article: 101.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is the most severe clinical presentation of acute systemic allergic reactions. The occurrence of anaphylaxis has increased in recent years, and subsequently, there is a need to continue disseminating knowledge on the diagnosis and management, so every healthcare professional is prepared to deal with such emergencies. The rationale of this updated position document is the need to keep guidance aligned with the current state of the art of knowledge in anaphylaxis management. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) anaphylaxis guidelines were published in 2011, and the current guidance adopts their major indications, incorporating some novel changes. Intramuscular epinephrine (adrenaline) continues to be the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis. Nevertheless, its use remains suboptimal. After an anaphylaxis occurrence, patients should be referred to a specialist to assess the potential cause and to be educated on prevention of recurrences and self-management. The limited availability of epinephrine auto-injectors remains a major problem in many countries, as well as their affordability for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, and ARADyAL research network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio J. Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yehia El-Gamal
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Unit, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Stanley Fineman
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mario Geller
- Division of Medicine, Academy of Medicine of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Paul A. Greenberger
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mario Sanchez Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad and Clinica El Ávila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Luciana Kase Tanno
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Brazil andUniversity Hospital of Montpellier, São Paulo, Montpellier, and Sorbonne Université, INSERM Paris, France, and WHO Collaborating Centre on Scientific Classification Support Montpellier, and WHO ICD-11 Medical and Scientific Advisory Committee Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bernard Y. Thong
- Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Paul J. Turner
- National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Charite-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
Rose M. Low end-tidal carbon dioxide as a marker of severe anaesthetic anaphylaxis: the missing piece of the puzzle? Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:859-862. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
11
|
Kawano T, Scheuermeyer FX, Gibo K, Stenstrom R, Rowe B, Grafstein E, Grunau B. H1-antihistamines Reduce Progression to Anaphylaxis Among Emergency Department Patients With Allergic Reactions. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24:733-741. [PMID: 27976492 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Revised: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES H1-antihistamines (H1a) can be used to treat emergency department (ED) patients with allergic reactions; however, this is inconsistently done, likely because there is no evidence that this therapy has an impact on serious outcomes. Among ED patients initially presenting with allergic reactions, we investigated whether H1a were associated with lower rates of progression to anaphylaxis. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at two urban Canadian EDs from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2012. We included consecutive adult patients with allergic reactions while excluding those presenting with anaphylaxis, according to prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who subsequently developed anaphylaxis during medical care, either by emergency medical services (EMS) or in the ED. A prespecified subgroup analysis excluded patients who received H1a prior to EMS or ED contact. We compared those who received H1a and those who did not and used multivariable regression and propensity score adjustment techniques to compare outcomes. RESULTS Of 2,376 overall patients included, 1,880 (79.1%) were managed with H1a. Of the latter group, 36 of 1,880 (1.9%) developed anaphylaxis, compared to 17 of 496 (3.4%) in the non-H1a-treated group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17-0.70; number needed to treat [NNT] to benefit = 44.74, 95% CI = 35.36-99.67). In the subgroup analysis of 1,717 patients who did not receive H1a prior to EMS or ED contact, a similar association was observed (AOR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.10-0.50; NNT to benefit 38.20, 95% CI = 32.58-55.24). CONCLUSIONS Among ED patient with allergic reactions, H1a administration was associated with a lower likelihood of progression to anaphylaxis. These data indicate that early H1a treatment in the ED or prehospital setting may decrease progression to anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahisa Kawano
- Department of Emergency Medicine; St. Paul's Hospital; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of Fukui Hospital; Fukui Prefecture Japan
| | - Frank X. Scheuermeyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine; St. Paul's Hospital; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Koichiro Gibo
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital; Okinawa Japan
- Biostatistics Center; Kurume University; Kurume Fukuoka Japan
| | - Robert Stenstrom
- Department of Emergency Medicine; St. Paul's Hospital; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- School of Population and Public Health; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Brian Rowe
- Department of Emergency Medicine and the School of Public Health; University of Alberta; Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | - Eric Grafstein
- Department of Emergency Medicine; St. Paul's Hospital; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Brian Grunau
- Department of Emergency Medicine; St. Paul's Hospital; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- School of Population and Public Health; University of British Columbia; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences; Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kolawole H, Marshall SD, Crilly H, Kerridge R, Roessler P. Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group/ Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Perioperative Anaphylaxis Management Guidelines. Anaesth Intensive Care 2017; 45:151-158. [DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1704500204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is an uncommon but important cause of serious morbidity and even mortality in the perioperative period. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) with the Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group (ANZAAG) have developed clinical management guidelines that include six crisis management cards. The content of the guidelines and cards is based on published literature and other international guidelines for the management of anaesthesia-related and non–anaesthesia-related anaphylaxis. The evidence is summarised in the associated background paper (Perioperative Anaphylaxis Management Guidelines [2016] www.anzca.edu.au/resources/endorsed-guidelines and www.anzaag.com/Mgmt%20Resources.aspx ). These guidelines are intended to apply to anaphylaxis occurring only during the perioperative period. They are not intended to apply to anaphylaxis outside the setting of dedicated monitoring and management by an anaesthetist. In this paper guidelines will be presented along with a brief background to their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Kolawole
- Specialist Anaesthetist, Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - S. D. Marshall
- Senior Lecturer, Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Specialist Anaesthetist, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - H. Crilly
- Specialist Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Tweed Heads Hospital, Tweed Heads, New South Wales
| | - R. Kerridge
- Director of Perioperative Medicine, Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, Conjoint Associate Professor, Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales
| | - P. Roessler
- Director of Professional Affairs, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Melbourne, Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanchez A, Valverde A, Sinclair M, Mosley C, Singh A, Mutsaers AJ, Hanna B, Gu Y, Johnson R. The pharmacokinetics of DPH after the administration of a single intravenous or intramuscular dose in healthy dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2016; 39:452-9. [PMID: 26813802 DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine (DPH) in healthy dogs following a single i.v. or i.m. dose. Dogs were randomly allocated in two treatment groups and received DPH at 1 mg/kg, i.v., or 2 mg/kg, i.m. Blood samples were collected serially over 24 h. Plasma concentrations of DPH were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the commercially available software. Cardio-respiratory parameters, rectal temperature and effects on behaviour, such as sedation or excitement, were recorded. Diphenhydramine Clarea , Vdarea and T1/2 were 20.7 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min, 7.6 ± 0.7 L/kg and 4.2 ± 0.5 h for the i.v. route, respectively, and Clarea /F, Vdarea /F and T1/2 20.8 ± 2.7 mL/kg/min, 12.3 ± 1.2 L/kg and 6.8 ± 0.7 h for the i.m. route, respectively. Bioavailability was 88% after i.m. administration. No significant differences were found in physiological parameters between groups or within dogs of the same group, and values remained within normal limits. No adverse effects or changes in mental status were observed after the administration of DPH. Both routes of administration resulted in DPH plasma concentrations which exceeded levels considered therapeutic in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sanchez
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - A Valverde
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - M Sinclair
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - C Mosley
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - A Singh
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - A J Mutsaers
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - B Hanna
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Y Gu
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - R Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stone SF, Phillips EJ, Wiese MD, Heddle RJ, Brown SGA. Immediate-type hypersensitivity drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 78:1-13. [PMID: 24286446 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis have been reported for nearly all classes of therapeutic reagents and these reactions can occur within minutes to hours of exposure. These reactions are unpredictable, not directly related to dose or the pharmacological action of the drug and have a relatively high mortality risk. This review will focus on the clinical presentation, immune mechanisms, diagnosis and prevention of the most serious form of immediate onset drug hypersensitivity reaction, anaphylaxis. The incidence of drug-induced anaphylaxis deaths appears to be increasing and our understanding of the multiple and complex reasons for the unpredictable nature of anaphylaxis to drugs is also expanding. This review highlights the importance of enhancing our understanding of the biology of the patient (i.e. immune response, genetics) as well as the pharmacology and chemistry of the drug when investigating, diagnosing and treating drug hypersensitivity. Misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity leads to substantial patient risk and cost. Although oral provocation is often considered the gold standard of diagnosis, it can pose a potential risk to the patient. There is an urgent need to improve and standardize diagnostic testing and desensitization protocols as other diagnostic tests currently available for assessment of immediate drug allergy are not highly predictive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley F Stone
- Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and the University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia; Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
17
|
Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, Santos AF, Zolkipli ZQ, Bellou A, Beyer K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Cardona V, Clark AT, Demoly P, Dubois AEJ, DunnGalvin A, Eigenmann P, Halken S, Harada L, Lack G, Jutel M, Niggemann B, Ruëff F, Timmermans F, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Werfel T, Dhami S, Panesar S, Akdis CA, Sheikh A. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 2014; 69:1026-45. [PMID: 24909803 DOI: 10.1111/all.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 612] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a clinical emergency, and all healthcare professionals should be familiar with its recognition and acute and ongoing management. These guidelines have been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Taskforce on Anaphylaxis. They aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for the recognition, risk factor assessment, and the management of patients who are at risk of, are experiencing, or have experienced anaphylaxis. While the primary audience is allergists, these guidelines are also relevant to all other healthcare professionals. The development of these guidelines has been underpinned by two systematic reviews of the literature, both on the epidemiology and on clinical management of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition whose clinical diagnosis is based on recognition of a constellation of presenting features. First-line treatment for anaphylaxis is intramuscular adrenaline. Useful second-line interventions may include removing the trigger where possible, calling for help, correct positioning of the patient, high-flow oxygen, intravenous fluids, inhaled short-acting bronchodilators, and nebulized adrenaline. Discharge arrangements should involve an assessment of the risk of further reactions, a management plan with an anaphylaxis emergency action plan, and, where appropriate, prescribing an adrenaline auto-injector. If an adrenaline auto-injector is prescribed, education on when and how to use the device should be provided. Specialist follow-up is essential to investigate possible triggers, to perform a comprehensive risk assessment, and to prevent future episodes by developing personalized risk reduction strategies including, where possible, commencing allergen immunotherapy. Training for the patient and all caregivers is essential. There are still many gaps in the evidence base for anaphylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Muraro
- Department of Mother and Child Health; Padua General University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - G. Roberts
- David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre; St Mary's Hospital; Isle of Wight UK
- NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Southampton UK
- Human Development in Health and Clinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Units; University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine; Southampton UK
| | - M. Worm
- Allergy-Center-Charité; Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - M. B. Bilò
- Allergy Unit; Department of Internal Medicine; University Hospital; Ospedali Riuniti; Ancona Italy
| | - K. Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Biederstein; Technische Universität München; Munich Germany
| | | | - A. F. Santos
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology; Department of Pediatric Allergy; King's College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
- Immunoallergology Department; Coimbra University Hospital; Coimbra Portugal
| | - Z. Q. Zolkipli
- David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre; St Mary's Hospital; Isle of Wight UK
- NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Southampton UK
- Human Development in Health and Clinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Units; University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine; Southampton UK
| | - A. Bellou
- European Society for Emergency Medicine and Emergency Department; Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital; Rennes France
| | - K. Beyer
- Department of Pediatric, Pneumology and Immunology; Charité, Universitatsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - C. Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
| | - V. Cardona
- Allergy Section; Department of Internal Medicine; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron; Barcelona Spain
| | - A. T. Clark
- Allergy Section; Department of Medicine; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - P. Demoly
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - A. E. J. Dubois
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergy; University of Groningen; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
- GRIAC Research Institute; University of Groningen; University Medical Center Groningen; Groningen the Netherlands
| | - A. DunnGalvin
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health; University College; Cork Ireland
| | - P. Eigenmann
- University Hospitals of Geneva; Geneva Switzerland
| | - S. Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
| | | | - G. Lack
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology; Department of Pediatric Allergy; King's College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
| | - M. Jutel
- Wroclaw Medical University; Wroclaw Poland
| | | | - F. Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität; München Germany
| | - F. Timmermans
- Nederlands Anafylaxis Netwerk - European Anaphylaxis Taskforce; Dordrecht The Netherlands
| | - B. J. Vlieg-Boerstra
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergy; Emma Children's Hospital; Academic Medical Center; University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - T. Werfel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| | - S. Dhami
- Evidence-Based Health Care Ltd; Edinburgh UK
| | - S. Panesar
- Evidence-Based Health Care Ltd; Edinburgh UK
| | - C. A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF); University of Zurich; Davos Switzerland
| | - A. Sheikh
- Allergy & Respiratory Research Group; Centre for Population Health Sciences; The University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simons FER, Ardusso LRF, Bilò MB, Cardona V, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal YM, Lieberman P, Lockey RF, Muraro A, Roberts G, Sanchez-Borges M, Sheikh A, Shek LP, Wallace DV, Worm M. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J 2014; 7:9. [PMID: 24920969 PMCID: PMC4038846 DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ICON: Anaphylaxis provides a unique perspective on the principal evidence-based anaphylaxis guidelines developed and published independently from 2010 through 2014 by four allergy/immunology organizations. These guidelines concur with regard to the clinical features that indicate a likely diagnosis of anaphylaxis -- a life-threatening generalized or systemic allergic or hypersensitivity reaction. They also concur about prompt initial treatment with intramuscular injection of epinephrine (adrenaline) in the mid-outer thigh, positioning the patient supine (semi-reclining if dyspneic or vomiting), calling for help, and when indicated, providing supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, along with concomitant monitoring of vital signs and oxygenation. Additionally, they concur that H1-antihistamines, H2-antihistamines, and glucocorticoids are not initial medications of choice. For self-management of patients at risk of anaphylaxis in community settings, they recommend carrying epinephrine auto-injectors and personalized emergency action plans, as well as follow-up with a physician (ideally an allergy/immunology specialist) to help prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. ICON: Anaphylaxis describes unmet needs in anaphylaxis, noting that although epinephrine in 1 mg/mL ampules is available worldwide, other essentials, including supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation, and epinephrine auto-injectors are not universally available. ICON: Anaphylaxis proposes a comprehensive international research agenda that calls for additional prospective studies of anaphylaxis epidemiology, patient risk factors and co-factors, triggers, clinical criteria for diagnosis, randomized controlled trials of therapeutic interventions, and measures to prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. It also calls for facilitation of global collaborations in anaphylaxis research. IN ADDITION TO CONFIRMING THE ALIGNMENT OF MAJOR ANAPHYLAXIS GUIDELINES, ICON: Anaphylaxis adds value by including summary tables and citing 130 key references. It is published as an information resource about anaphylaxis for worldwide use by healthcare professionals, academics, policy-makers, patients, caregivers, and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Estelle R Simons
- Department of Pediatrics & Child Health and Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Room FE125, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
| | - Ledit RF Ardusso
- Cátedra Neumonología, Alergia e Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - M Beatrice Bilò
- Allergy Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Clinical Research Center for Allergy & Rheumatology, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yehia M El-Gamal
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Unit, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Richard F Lockey
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Department of Women and Child Health, Food Allergy Referral Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Graham Roberts
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, United Kingdom, David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St. Mary’s Hospital, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Sanchez-Borges
- Centro Medico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Clinica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Center for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lynette P Shek
- Department of Pediatrics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Margitta Worm
- Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Klinik fur Dermatologie und Allergologie, Charité, Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simons FER, Ardusso LRF, Dimov V, Ebisawa M, El-Gamal YM, Lockey RF, Sanchez-Borges M, Senna GE, Sheikh A, Thong BY, Worm M. World Allergy Organization Anaphylaxis Guidelines: 2013 update of the evidence base. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013; 162:193-204. [PMID: 24008815 DOI: 10.1159/000354543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis are a widely disseminated and used resource for information about anaphylaxis. They focus on patients at risk, triggers, clinical diagnosis, treatment in health care settings, self-treatment in the community, and prevention of recurrences. Their unique strengths include a global perspective informed by prior research on the global availability of essentials for anaphylaxis assessment and management and a global agenda for anaphylaxis research. Additionally, detailed colored illustrations are linked to key concepts in the text [Simons et al.: J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:593.e1-e22]. The recommendations in the original WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines for management of anaphylaxis in health care settings and community settings were based on evidence published in peer-reviewed, indexed medical journals to the end of 2010. These recommendations remain unchanged and clinically relevant. An update of the evidence base was published in 2012 [Simons et al.: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;12:389-399]. In 2012 and early 2013, major advances were reported in the following areas: further characterization of patient phenotypes; development of in vitro tests (for some allergens) that help distinguish clinical risk of anaphylaxis from asymptomatic sensitization; epinephrine (adrenaline) research, including studies of a new epinephrine auto-injector for use in community settings, and randomized controlled trials of immunotherapy to prevent food-induced anaphylaxis. Despite these advances, the need for additional prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials of interventions in anaphylaxis is increasingly apparent. This 2013 Update highlights publications from 2012 and 2013 that further contribute to the evidence base for the recommendations made in the original WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines. Ideally, it should be used in conjunction with these Guidelines and with the 2012 Guidelines Update.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Estelle R Simons
- Departments of Pediatrics and Child Health, and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|