Evaluation of Long-Term Combination Therapy With Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

Effect of proactive combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on technique survival and mortality

PURPOSE

Clinically relevant evidence for the timing of starting combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis remains scarce. We retrospectively examined whether combination therapy during the induction phase of dialysis prolongs peritoneal dialysis duration.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 160 patients who underwent combination therapy from 20 dialysis facilities. Four groups were categorized: combination at peritoneal dialysis induction (n = 12, Proactive combination group), and combination following peritoneal dialysis durations of < 2 years (n = 65), 2-5 years (n = 70), or > 5 years (n = 13). Differences in technique survival of dialysis, mortality, and hospitalization due to cardiovascular events in the groups were observed.

RESULTS

The Proactive combination group had the longer mean duration of combination therapy (3.18 years) comparing to that of combination therapy following peritoneal dialysis (1.45 years), but total peritoneal dialysis duration was shorter than in control groups (4.02 years). Of the 160 cases in the entire cohort, there were 8 deaths, 18 ischemic heart disease hospitalizations, and 18 stroke hospitalizations. The Proactive group had lower crude mortality rate (0/12 cases, 0.0%) and crude hospitalization rate for ischemic heart disease (1/11, 8.3%) than the other groups. However, this cohort study did not have enough statistical power to adjust for patients' background, and we were unable to fully examine the differences in such clinical outcomes by the timing of initiation of combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Use of combination therapy in the induction phase might prolong the duration of combination therapy, but is not necessarily effective for prolonging peritoneal dialysis technique survival.

Comparable outcomes between a combination of peritoneal dialysis with once-weekly haemodialysis and thrice-weekly haemodialysis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of a combination of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and once-weekly haemodialysis (PD + HD) have not been extensively studied.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study using the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry included those who transitioned from PD to PD + HD therapy or thrice-weekly HD from 2011 to 2018. Exposure was PD + HD therapy compared with thrice-weekly HD. The outcome was time to all-cause or cause-specific death. Associations between PD + HD therapy and outcomes were examined by Cox regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed by propensity score (PS) matching, PS matching with a shared frailty model in which dialysis facilities were treated as a random effect, inverse probability weighting (IPW), PS adjustment, PS stratification, competing risk regression and on-treatment analyses in which data were censored at the transition to thrice-weekly HD for those on PD + HD therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1001 subjects transitioned to PD + HD therapy and 2031 to thrice-weekly HD. During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 575 subjects died. All-cause, cardiovascular, congestive heart failure-related or infection-related mortality were not significantly different between those on PD + HD and those on thrice-weekly HD [hazard ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.16), 1.26 (0.92-1.72), 1.24 (0.77-1.99) and 0.89 (0.57-1.39), respectively]. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results except that PD + HD therapy was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality by PS adjustment and PS matching with the shared frailty model and lower infection-related mortality by PS adjustment and IPW.

CONCLUSIONS

PD + HD therapy was associated with similar or potentially lower mortality compared with thrice-weekly HD. Considering a flexible lifestyle, PD + HD therapy could be a great option.

Changes in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent responsiveness after transfer to combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for patients on peritoneal dialysis: A prospective multicenter study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate dialysis and fluid overload are corrected after starting combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). However, the effects on anemia management has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of 40 PD patients (age, 60 ± 10 years; male, 88%; median PD duration, 28 months) starting combined therapy and investigated changes in several clinical parameters, including erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance index (ERI).

RESULTS

ERI decreased significantly during 6 months after switching to combined therapy (from 11.8 [IQR 8.0-20.4] units/week/kg/(g/dL) to 7.8 [IQR 3.9-18.6] units/week/kg/(g/dL), p = 0.047). Body weight, urinary volume, serum creatinine and the dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr) decreased, whereas hemoglobin and serum albumin increased. In subgroup analysis, the changes in ERI were not affected by cause for starting combined therapy, PD holiday and D/P Cr.

CONCLUSION

Although detailed mechanism was unclear, ESA responsiveness improved after switching from PD alone to combined therapy.

Impact on change in serum beta 2 microglobulin by combination therapy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a 12-month preliminary observational study

Background

In the Japanese guidelines on combination peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) therapy, patients with serum beta 2 microglobulin (β2MG) levels less than 30 mg/L are recommended. And PD patients with β2MG more than 30 mg/L are considered to transfer to the PD + HD combination therapy. However, the resultant changes in serum β2MG levels by the introduction of PD + HD combination therapy and the factors influencing the change have not clearly elucidated.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 11 PD patients (mean age 56.4 ± 12.9 years, 10 males) with baseline β2MG levels > 30 mg/L with respect to changes in β2MG and its related factors for 12 months after the introduction of combination therapy of PD plus once a week HD (4 h) using a high-performance dialyzer. Laboratory data including hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and the patients’ demographic profiles, and HD-related factors, such as Kt/V and blood flow rate, were assessed.

Results

Serum β2MG levels decreased statistically significantly after the introduction of combination therapy: from 36.7 ± 6.7 mg/L at 0 months, to 33.4 ± 6.1 mg/L at 3 months (p = 0.030, compared to baseline), 32.9 ± 4.5 mg/L at 6 months (p = 0.009), and 33.3 ± 5.3 mg/L at 12 months (p = 0.023), respectively. However, only 27–36% patients achieved target β2MG levels of < 30 mg/L during the observation period. Regarding influencing factors, serum albumin levels, blood flow rates of HD, residual renal function and baseline β2MG were associated with a decrease in serum β2MG levels on univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, serum albumin at 3 and 12 months correlated significantly with Δβ2MG (β =  − 0.990, p = 0.032 at 3 months, β =  − 0.551, p = 0.033 at 12 months). Urine volume at 12 months correlated significantly with Δβ2MG (β = 0.507, p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Combination therapy of PD and HD might reduce serum β2MG levels, but with marginal efficacy. Our preliminary data indicate that the combination therapy of PD and once weekly HD is not sufficient to significantly decrease serum β2MG levels. Additional HD prescriptions, such as increase in blood flow rate and hemodiafiltration, need to be tested in order to improve β2MG levels in these patients.

Literature review: Combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy

Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the recommended renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Complementary hemodialysis (HD) once per week for PD patients can aid in achieving adequate dialysis and extend the duration of PD treatment. In Japan, this therapy is termed “combined therapy with PD and hemodialysis (combPDHD).” CombPDHD represents a treatment option for PD patients for whom adequate dialysis cannot be maintained. CombPDHD has been widely applied in Japanese PD patients; however, it is much less common outside of Japan. Clinical evidence, particularly regarding long-term prognosis and appropriate duration of treatment, remains insufficient.

Summary

CombPDHD will be required as an alternative for increasing the dose of PD under various conditions, such as a loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and peritoneal functional failure. The Japanese regimen for combPDHD involves 5 or 6 days of PD, combined with one weekly session of hemodialysis. According to some reports, the potential benefits of combPDHD are peritoneal rest with improved peritoneal function and delay in membrane deterioration. CombPDHD prevents peritoneal dysfunction and reduces cardiovascular complications by adjusting the fluid volume and improving renal anemia. Increased D/PCr indicates a deterioration in peritoneal function and is an independent risk factor for encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS). It is previously reported that no significant differences in combPDHD duration were observed between EPS and non-EPS groups. Laparoscopic findings involving patients with combPDHD revealed that there was a difference in abdominal wall degeneration depending on the intra-abdominal cavity of each case. Recently, prospective studies on long-term peritoneal function, survival, and hospitalization in combPDHD have been reported. However, reviews evaluating combPDHD long-term outcomes in multicenter and prospective studies are lacking.

Conclusion

It is difficult to continue PD alone with a declining RKF or when self-management is poor. Hence, combPDHD should be started to adjust the fluid volume, with adequate dialysis dose and peritoneal rest. This therapy is useful from a lifestyle viewpoint during the transition period from PD to HD and should not be continued indefinitely.

Clinical feasibility of transfer to combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for patients on peritoneal dialysis: A prospective multicenter study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Although combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) is widespread in Japan, its clinical utility has been reported only in retrospective or before-and-after test lacking a control group.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of 176 incident PD patients and compared patient survival and changes in clinical parameters between patients on different dialysis modalities.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 41 months, 47 patients transferred to combined therapy and 35 patients transferred directly to HD. Patients transferred to combined therapy had a significantly better survival than those transferred directly to HD. However, we could not establish this difference in a multivariate analysis because only six patients died among these groups. The decreases in urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were more prominent among patients directly transferred to HD.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report revealing clinical feasibility of transfer to combined therapy for PD patients.

Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients Combined with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 58 patients at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University who switched from PD to PHD. Clinical data and echocardiographic examination results were collected. Data from the two groups with a normal distribution were compared with the paired t-test. A pvalue <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 58 subjects were enrolled, including 46 males and 12 females, with a median age of 50.2 ± 11.1 (47-68) years. The mean duration of peritoneal dialysis was 67.2 ± 33.6 months. Before and after PHD, the ultrafiltration volume (p = 0.021) and hemoglobin (p = 0.001) were increased, while SBP (p = 0.002), DBP (p = 0.002), phosphorus (p < 0.001), and ESA dosage (p < 0.001) were decreased. Before and after combined dialysis (PHD), the incidence of LVH was 76.4% and 61.8%, respectively (p = 0.013), and LVMI decreased from 173.8 ± 86.2 g/m² to 160.6 ± 78.5 g/m² (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PD alone, the combination of PD and HD resulted in regression of LVH and reduced LVMI.

Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 1 (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy)

Approximately 10 years have passed since the Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines were formulated in 2009. Much evidence has been reported during the succeeding years, which were not taken into consideration in the previous guidelines, e.g., the next peritoneal dialysis PD trial of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) in Japan, the significance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), the effects of icodextrin solution, new developments in peritoneal pathology, and a new international recommendation on a proposal for exit-site management. It is essential to incorporate these new developments into the new clinical practice guidelines. Meanwhile, the process of creating such guidelines has changed dramatically worldwide and differs from the process of creating what were “clinical practice guides.” For this revision, we not only conducted systematic reviews using global standard methods but also decided to adopt a two-part structure to create a reference tool, which could be used widely by the society’s members attending a variety of patients. Through a working group consensus, it was decided that Part 1 would present conventional descriptions and Part 2 would pose clinical questions (CQs) in a systematic review format. Thus, Part 1 vastly covers PD that would satisfy the requirements of the members of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This article is the duplicated publication from the Japanese version of the guidelines and has been reproduced with permission from the JSDT.

Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis and Mortality Related to Infection in Patients on Combination Once-Weekly Hemodialysis with Peritoneal Dialysis

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies showed that the combination of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and once-weekly hemodialysis is associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. This study aimed to compare the incidence of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) and infection-related mortality among those on combination therapy and those on PD alone.

METHODS

This prospective study on the Japanese Renal Data Registry included patients on PD from 2010 to 2014. Subjects were followed up until the end of 2015. Exposure of interest was combination therapy compared with PD alone. Patients who transitioned to combination therapy were matched with those on PD alone by propensity scores. Outcomes were EPS and infection-related mortality. Data were analyzed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among the matched cohort, 608 and 869 patients were on combination therapy and on PD alone, respectively. Dialysate-to-plasma creatinine (D/P Cr) ratio decreased over time among those on combination therapy, while the ratio increased among those on PD alone (p = 0.01 by the mixed-effects model). During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 33 experienced EPS and 55 died of infection. Combination therapy was associated with lower infection-related mortality (HR [95% CI]: 0.52 [0.28-0.95]) but not with EPS (HR: 1.21 [0.61-2.40]). Lower mortality was not limited to intra-abdominal infection but also observed for pulmonary infection. Sensitivity analyses considering the effects of dialysis facilities yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy was associated with lower infection-related mortality. It was also associated with a decline in the D/P Cr ratio over time but not with lower incidence of EPS during the short observation period.

Combination of once-weekly haemodialysis with peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower mortality compared with peritoneal dialysis alone: a longitudinal study

Background

Approximately 20% of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Japan are on combination with once-weekly haemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to compare outcomes of combination therapy and PD alone.

Methods

This longitudinal study on the Japanese Renal Data Registry included patients on PD from 2010 to 2014. Subjects were followed until the end of 2015. Exposure of interest was combination therapy compared with PD alone. Outcomes were complete transition to HD, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF)-related mortality. Patients who initiated combination therapy were matched with those on PD alone by propensity scores. Data were analysed using Cox regression models.

Results

Among the matched cohort, 608 patients were on combination therapy and 869 were on PD alone. Decline in body weight and residual renal function was more prominent in the combination therapy group. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 224 deaths occurred. All-cause mortality {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.56 (0.42–0.75)}, CV mortality [HR 0.48 (0.32–0.72)] and CHF-related mortality [HR 0.19 (0.07–0.55)] were significantly lower, but complete transition to HD was significantly earlier [HR 1.72 (1.45–2.03)] in the combination therapy group. Sensitivity analyses considering the effects of dialysis facilities yielded similar results. Assuming causality, numbers needed to treat to prevent one death per year were 34 patients.

Conclusions

Combination therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality, CV mortality and CHF-related mortality, but earlier transition to HD compared with PD alone, which might be due to better fluid removal by HD.

Comparative study on the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy

Objective

Diabetic nephropathy is a serious threat to human health, and its incidence is on the rise. End-stage diabetic nephropathy (ESDN) requires extra investigation due to its complexity and severity, as well as serious concurrent diseases. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of ESDN.

Methods

Clinical data of 84 patients with ESDN admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an HD group that received hemodialysis and a PD group that received peritoneal dialysis. Their general conditions, biochemical indicators, residual renal function and incidence of complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

(1) No significant difference in diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, body weight, or urine output was detected between the two groups at the beginning of dialysis (P>0.05). (2) Compared to the PD group, the HD group had significantly lower total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) (P<0.05), and significantly higher total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) after treatment (P<0.05). (3) The two groups also showed significant difference in residual renal function after treatment (P<0.05). (4) The HD group had significantly higher systolic pressure than the PD group after treatment (P<0.05). And more cases of infection were observed in the PD group than the HD group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both HD and PD are used for treatment of ESDN, and can achieve similar calcium and phosphorus control. Compared to HD, PD has less adverse effect on hemodynamics and better preserves residual renal function, but is more likely to cause malnutrition and disorders of lipid metabolism. Therefore, choice of dialysis method should be based on specific conditions of each patient.

Ultrafiltration volume by once-weekly hemodialysis is a predictor of technique survival of combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis

Overhydration is a major cause of technique failure of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Hence, we investigated the impact of ultrafiltration (UF) volume by once-weekly hemodialysis (HD), excess volume beyond their dry weight, on technique survival of PD and HD combination therapy (PD+HD). Forty-six anuric PD+HD patients were divided into three groups according to baseline UF volume by HD: low-UF (<mean - 1SD), middle-UF (≥mean - 1SD and <mean + 1SD), and high-UF (≥mean + 1SD). High-UF group showed larger extracellular water normalized to height (P = .038) and longer HD sessions (P < .001) compared with low-UF group, whereas low-UF group was older than middle-UF group (P = .001). Technique survival rate was significantly lower in high-UF group than in low and middle-UF groups (P < .001), and the rates at 44 months were 80%, 90%, 20% in low, middle, and high-UF groups, respectively. Chronic overhydration was the leading cause of technique failure for all. This study suggests that fluid overload remains a major cause of technique failure of PD even after once-weekly HD is added.

Hospitalization for Patients on Combination Therapy With Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Compared With Hemodialysis

Introduction

Combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis (PD+HD) is widely used for PD patients with decreased residual kidney function in Japan; however, hospitalization for this combined dialysis has not been investigated so far. We compared the risk of hospitalization for PD+HD with that for HD.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective observational study was conducted on 42 PD+HD and 42 HD patients matched for age and diabetic nephropathy. The main outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of hospitalization for any cause assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Hospitalization rates (the number of admissions per 100 patient-years) associated with dialysis modality were also calculated. The impact of dialysis modality on time to hospitalization was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

There was no significant difference between groups in terms of age, sex, dialysis vintage, diabetic nephropathy, and comorbidities. The cumulative incidence of hospitalization did not significantly differ between the groups (log-rank test, P = 0.36). Although total hospitalization rates were 66.0 in PD+HD and 59.2 in HD, hospitalization rates for the sum of PD-related infections (a composite of catheter-related infection and peritonitis) and vascular access troubles were 21.7 in PD+HD and 7.2 in HD. On univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, dialysis modality had no significant impact on time to hospitalization.

Conclusion

The risk of hospitalization was not significantly different between PD+HD and HD, although PD+HD patients had a higher risk of dialysis access–related complications than HD patients.

Health-related quality of life on combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in comparison with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A cross-sectional study

Background:

The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of dialysis patients has not been well examined, especially in combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis (PD+HD) patients. We compared the HRQOL of PD+HD patients with that of HD and PD patients.

Methods:

A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted on 36 PD+HD, 103 HD, and 90 PD patients in Japan who completed the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 36, version 1.3. HRQOL scores were summarized into physical- (PCS), mental- (MCS), role/social- (RCS), and kidney disease component summaries (KDCS).

Results:

Of the PD+HD patients, 31 (86%) transferred from PD and 5 (14%) transferred from HD. They had the longest dialysis vintage and the smallest urine volume. PCS, MCS, and KDCS HRQOL scores of PD+HD patients were comparable with those of HD and PD patients. However, the RCS score for PD+HD was significantly higher than that for HD ( p = 0.020) and comparable with that for PD. PD+HD and PD were associated with significantly higher RCS scores than HD after adjusting for age, gender, diabetic nephropathy, dialysis vintage, ischemic heart disease, and peripheral arterial disease.

Conclusions:

For RCS, HRQOL in PD+HD patients was better than that in HD and comparable with that in PD patients, whereas the PCS, MCS, and KDCS HRQOL scores of PD+HD patients were comparable with those of HD and PD patients.

Bioimpedance Spectroscopy-Based Fluid Status in Combined Dialysis Compared With Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis (PD+HD) is widely used in Japan for PD patients with decreased residual renal function. However, fluid status in PD+HD patients has not been well studied. In this cross-sectional study, we compared fluid status in 41 PD+HD patients with that in 103 HD and 92 PD patients using the bioimpedance spectroscopy. Extracellular water normalized to patient height (NECW, kg/m) was the highest in pre-HD (8.3 ± 1.6) followed by PD (7.9 ± 2.7), PD+HD (7.5 ± 2.5), and post-HD patients (6.9 ± 1.5) (P < 0.01). By multiple linear regression analysis, PD+HD was associated with a significantly lower NECW than pre-HD (β = -0.8, P = 0.03) and similar to PD (β = -0.5, P = 0.24) and post-HD (β = 0.6, P = 0.08) after adjustment for age, sex, diabetic nephropathy, ischemic heart disease, dialysis period, and daily urine volume. There was no correlation between NECW and daily urine volume in all dialysis groups. Average daily fluid removal (a sum of urine volume and ultrafiltration volume by dialysis) was positively correlated with NECW in PD+HD and pre-HD, but not in PD and post-HD patients. Our results suggest that fluid status in PD+HD patients with decreased residual renal function is acceptable as compared with that in HD and PD patients.