Therapeutic plasma exchange in neurological diseases: Eleven years experience at a tertiary care center in Turkey

Early clinical response and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange in central nervous system demyelinating diseases

Background

Appropriate treatment reduces the severity and duration of relapses in demyelinating diseases of Central Nervous System (CNS). If high-dose corticosteroids treatment fails, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered as a rescue treatment.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate early clinical response and complications of TPE and prognostic factors in CNS demyelinating relapses.

Design

This prospective observational study was designed in a tertiary center during one year.

Methods

All adult patients diagnosed corticosteroid-resistant Multiple Sclerosis (MS), NeuroMyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), idiotypic Transverse Myelitis or Clinical Isolated Syndrome relapses, were eligible. Clinical response is defined based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at discharge. Clinical and laboratory complications recorded.

Results

Seventy-two patients were analyzed which 58.3% patients were female. MS was diagnosed for 61.1% of cases. Thirty-five patients (48.6%) responded and the mean differences of EDSS significantly decreased 0.60 score (CI95%:0.44-.77). Electrolyte imbalances and thrombocytopenia occurred in 80.6% and 55.6% of cases respectively and 40.3% of patients had systemic reactions. However, 26.4% patients experienced moderate to severe complications. In patients with moderate to severe disability, responders were younger (MD: 8.42 years, CI95%: 1.67-15.17) and had lower EDSS score at admission (median:6, IQR: 5.5-6 against 7.5 IQR: 6.5-8). The risk of failure was higher in active progressive MS patients compared with RRMS patients (OR: 6.06, CI 95%:1.37-26.76). Patients with thrombocytopenia were hospitalized more than others (MD: 1.5 days, CI 95%: 0-3). Females were more prone to hypokalemia and systemic reactions (OR: 3.11, CI 95%:1.17-8.24 and OR: 6.67, CI 95%:2.14-20.81 respectively).

Conclusion

The most common indication of TPE was corticosteroid-resistant severe MS relapses. About half of the patients presented an early clinical response. Lower disability, younger age and RRMS diagnosis are prognostic factors of better response. One out of four patients experienced moderate to severe complications, mainly electrolyte imbalances and systemic reactions. Appropriate interventions against these complications should be considered during TPE, especially in females.

Symptomatic and Disease-Modifying Therapy Pipeline for Alzheimer’s Disease: Towards a Personalized Polypharmacology Patient-Centered Approach

Since 1906, when Dr. Alois Alzheimer first described in a patient “a peculiar severe disease process of the cerebral cortex”, people suffering from this pathology have been waiting for a breakthrough therapy. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible, progressive neurodegenerative brain disorder and the most common form of dementia in the elderly with a long presymptomatic phase. Worldwide, approximately 50 million people are living with dementia, with AD comprising 60–70% of cases. Pathologically, AD is characterized by the deposition of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) in the neuropil (neuritic plaques) and blood vessels (amyloid angiopathy), and by the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau in neurons (neurofibrillary tangles) in the brain, with associated loss of synapses and neurons, together with glial activation, and neuroinflammation, resulting in cognitive deficits and eventually dementia. The current competitive landscape in AD consists of symptomatic treatments, of which there are currently six approved medications: three AChEIs (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine), one NMDA-R antagonist (memantine), one combination therapy (memantine/donepezil), and GV-971 (sodium oligomannate, a mixture of oligosaccharides derived from algae) only approved in China. Improvements to the approved therapies, such as easier routes of administration and reduced dosing frequencies, along with the developments of new strategies and combined treatments are expected to occur within the next decade and will positively impact the way the disease is managed. Recently, Aducanumab, the first disease-modifying therapy (DMT) has been approved for AD, and several DMTs are in advanced stages of clinical development or regulatory review. Small molecules, mAbs, or multimodal strategies showing promise in animal studies have not confirmed that promise in the clinic (where small to moderate changes in clinical efficacy have been observed), and therefore, there is a significant unmet need for a better understanding of the AD pathogenesis and the exploration of alternative etiologies and therapeutic effective disease-modifying therapies strategies for AD. Therefore, a critical review of the disease-modifying therapy pipeline for Alzheimer’s disease is needed.

Central venous catheters are associated with thrombosis among adult inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange

BACKGROUND

For inpatients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the United States, the primary mode of venous access is the central venous catheter (CVC). To evaluate the impact of CVC on thrombosis outcomes of patients undergoing TPE, we analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the NIS, we identified hospital discharges of adult patients treated with TPE. Cases were classified into two groups based on CVC status. The primary outcome was thrombosis. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges.

RESULTS

Among 9863 TPE-treated discharges, CVC was used in 5988 (60%). These numbers correspond to weighted national estimates of 49 315 and 29 940, respectively. There was a positive and significant association between CVC and thrombosis (OR = 1.23, 95% 1.04-1.46, P = 0.0174), PRBC transfusion (OR = 1.15, 95% 1.03-1.29, P = 0.0121), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.36, 95% 1.10-1.68, P = 0.0043), hospital LOS (15.63 vs 12.45 days, P < 0.0001) and hospital charges ($166 387 vs. $132 655, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients undergoing TPE, CVC use is associated with increased rates of thrombosis. Future studies are needed to investigate strategies to decrease CVC use and/or prevent CVC-associated complications in TPE-treated inpatients.

Bleeding outcomes of inpatients receiving therapeutic plasma exchange: A propensity-matched analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is associated with hemostatic abnormalities, its impact on bleeding outcomes is unknown. Therefore, the main study objective was to determine bleeding outcomes of inpatients treated with TPE.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), discharges were identified with 10 common TPE-treated conditions. A 1:3 propensity-matched analysis of TPE- to non-TPE-treated discharges was performed. The primary outcome was major bleeding and secondary outcomes were packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, mortality, disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association between TPE and study outcomes.

RESULTS

The study population was 15,964 discharges, of which 3991 were TPE- treated. The prevalence of major bleeding was low (5.4%). When compared to non-TPE discharges, TPE had a significant and positive association with major bleeding (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.63, p = .0003). TPE was also associated with PRBC transfusion (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.42-1.94, p < .0001), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.90, p = .0008), hospital length of stay (12.45 [95% CI: 11.95-12.97] vs. 7.38 [95% CI: 7.12-7.65] days, p < .0001) and total charges, ($125,123 [95% CI: $119,220-$131,317] vs. $61,953 [95% CI: $59,391-$64,625], p < .0001), and disposition to non-self-care (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19-1.39, p < .0001).

DISCUSSION

The use of TPE in the inpatient setting is positively associated with bleeding; however, with low prevalence. Future studies should address risk factors that predispose patients to TPE-associated bleeding.