Improving nutrition care for neurosurgery patients through a nurse-led transition feeding protocol

Volume-based enteral feeding for ward patients with acute neurological conditions: a pilot prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring enteral nutrition (EN) after neurological insults experience feeding interruptions, contributing to inadequate nutrition delivery. This prospective cohort study investigated if volume-based enteral feeding (VBF) improved the delivery of prescribed EN volume in ward patients with acute neurological conditions.

METHODS

Over two sequential periods, the usual care group received standard continuous rate-based feeding, and the intervention group received VBF with bi-daily EN rate adjustments to achieve target daily volume. The primary outcome was percentage of prescribed daily EN formula volume delivered. Differences in energy and protein provision, weight, malnutrition and safety were explored. An evaluation survey captured nurse acceptability of the protocol.

RESULTS

The intervention group (n = 32) achieved greater median interquartile range (IQR) EN adequacy of prescribed volume at 92% (88-97) compared to 67% (54-78) for usual care (n = 35) (p < 0.001). VBF compared to rate-based feeding resulted in patients receiving more kilojoules (131 [121-138] kJ/kg vs. 84 [64-99] kJ/kg; p < 0.001) and protein (1.3 [1.2-1.5] g/kg vs. 0.9 [0.6-1.1] g/kg; p < 0.001). There were no differences in gastrointestinal intolerance between groups. Compliance to the VBF protocol was 90%, and 78% of staff reported high confidence using the protocol. The intervention group had less median weight loss at discharge (-1.4 [0.1 to -4.3] kg) than usual care (-3.6 [-1.3 to 8.4] kg; p < 0.011), but no differences in malnutrition status were observed.

CONCLUSION

A VBF protocol delivered greater EN volume, energy and protein following neurological injury. The VBF protocol was feasible with high acceptability from nursing staff.

Use and safety of enteral nutrition protocols in acute care: A scoping review of literature and retrospective audit of practice

AIM

Standardised enteral nutrition protocols are recommended in critical care, however their use and safety are not well described in other inpatient populations. This mixed methods study reports on the use and safety of enteral nutrition protocols for non-critically ill adults.

METHODS

A scoping review of published literature was conducted. In addition a retrospective audit of practice at an Australian tertiary teaching hospital with an existing hospital-wide standardised enteral nutrition protocol was performed. Data on use, safety and adequacy of enteral nutrition prescription were collected from medical records for patients receiving enteral nutrition on acute wards (January-March 2020).

RESULTS

Screening of 9298 records yielded six primary research articles. Studies were generally low quality. Published literature suggested that protocols may reduce time to enteral nutrition initiation and goal rate, and improve adequacy of nutrition provision. No adverse outcomes were reported. From the local audit of practice (105 admissions, 98 patients), enteral nutrition commencement was timely (median 0 (IQR 0-1) days from request; goal rate: median 1 (IQR 0-2) days from commencement and adequate (nil underfeeding), without prior dietitian review in 82% of cases. Enteral nutrition was commenced per protocol in 61% of instances. No adverse events, including refeeding syndrome, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Most inpatients requiring enteral nutrition can be safely and adequately managed on enteral nutrition protocols. Evaluation of protocols outside of the critical care setting remains a gap in the literature. Standardised enteral nutrition protocols may improve delivery of nutrition to patients, whilst allowing dietitians to focus on those with specialised nutrition support needs.

An evaluation of nasogastric (NG) tube removal practices and nutritional intake parameters in an acute neurosurgical population: The development of an NG Transition Feeding Protocol

BACKGROUND

As a result of the complex nature of neurosurgical patients, nasogastric (NG) tube feeding is often implemented for patients who are unable to consume adequate oral intake. During recovery, patients on enteral nutrition (EN) are progressed to oral nutrition, which can result in NGT removal and discontinuation of supportive feeding plans. This is often before patients become established on sufficient oral intake to meet their nutritional requirements.

METHODS

We conducted an exploration of current NG removal practices in patients (n = 23) across five neurosurgical wards over a 3-month period to assess practitioner review response times, NG feeding duration, decision making on NG removal, and the influence of dietary recommendations and differing EN protocols on patients' ability to meet their nutritional requirements. Our aim was to use this data to design and implement a protocol to improve consistency of these practices.

RESULTS

After oral intake was commenced, only those receiving supplementary EN achieved nutritional targets immediately. Conversely, no patient who had their NGT removed at this stage achieved these targets. Following NG removal, the likelihood of a patient meeting nutritional targets was influenced by the decision maker, supporting the practice of registered dietitian led cessation of NG feeding. These findings led us to develop an "NG Transition Feeding Protocol" to serve as a simple, clear pathway which treating teams can utilise to guide NG feeding decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

NG feeding supports neurosurgical patients to meet nutritional requirements in the early stages following commencement of oral intake. The development of an "NG Transition Feeding Protocol" may help to improve consistency of transition feeding on neurosurgical wards, allowing time for nutrition assessment to support informed decisions around NG removal. The aim of this protocol is to improve the efficiency of transition feeding, improve dietetic workload efficiency, nursing staff confidence and avoid compromising nutritional status of patients as a result of the early cessation of EN.