Efficacy of Antimicrobials Extracted from Organic Pecan Shell for Inhibiting the Growth ofListeriaspp

Antimicrobial screening of pecan shell extract and efficacy of pecan shell extract-pullulan coating against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus on blueberries

Pecan shell is considered an agricultural waste; however, it contains various bioactive compounds with potential inhibitory effect against microorganisms. This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of pecan shell extract (PSE) in vitro using disc-diffusion method and in vivo on blueberries as an antimicrobial coating using pullulan. For in vitro study, 5 and 10 % of aqueous (A-PSE) or ethanol pecan shell extract (E-PSE) incorporated into pullulan film were tested against different bacterial and fungal strains. Pullulan film disc was used as control. The diameter of growth inhibition (mm) around discs was measured. For in vivo study, PSE-P (5 % w/v aqueous pecan shell extract+5 % w/v pullulan), P (5 % w/v pullulan) or control (water) were spray coated on blueberries inoculated (∼5 log CFU/g) with Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica or Staphylococcus aureus; and stored at 4 °C, 50 ± 10 % RH for 15 days. The effect of antimicrobial coating against pathogens and its impact on quality during storage were determined. A-PSE and E-PSE films were more effective against Gram-positive bacteria and showed no antifungal effect at tested concentrations when evaluated in vitro. Immediately after coating on blueberries, PSE-P significantly reduced Listeria monocytogenes by 2 log CFU/g and lowered survival until day 5 than control or P. Native aerobic microbial population was reduced (P < 0.05) by 0.7 log CFU/g immediately after coating. PSE-P coating or storage time had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on the survival of S. enterica, S. aureus and native fungal population. PSE-P maintained the firmness of blueberry with no significant effect on its color, TSS, and pH during 15 days storage. PSE-P significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the spoilage rate by 21 % than control (28.5 %) and P (37 %); and minimized (P < 0.05) weight loss during storage. Pecan shell extracts show promise as a potential antimicrobial compound whose application on various food products or packaging material could be further explored.

Characterization of pecan shells and their effect on the physical properties and acceptability of smoked chicken breast

Pecan shells were used as a source of smoke for cooked chicken breast and compared with samples smoked with hickory, mesquite, and apple tree wood. The wood moisture content ranged from 7.94% to 11.43%, whereas ash ranged from 0.97% to 3.11%. The particle size varied among the smoke sources, with chopped pecan shells having more pieces in the "coarse" category. Several properties related to quality of the cooked meat were measured including moisture content, water activity, color, cook loss, expressible moisture, and maximum shear force. Moisture content ranged from 70.13% to 71.72%, whereas pH ranged from 6.39 to 6.43. Chicken breasts smoked with pecan shells were darker (L^* = 72.86 compared to 74.94 to 76.57) and slightly redder (a^* = 5.71; b^* = 25.70) than other samples. Color development was localized to the surface of the meat. Cooking loss did not differ significantly among the samples (26.13% to 27.03%) nor did expressible moisture (9.68% to 11.87%). Meat tenderness was assessed by shear values, but did not differ among the samples. Consumer panels showed that all samples were well liked. Samples smoked with mesquite had slightly lower scores for flavor and overall likability, whereas the scores for samples smoked with hickory, apple, or pecan shells were no different. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Many meat products are cooked in the presence of smoke produced from burning hardwoods. This work shows that smoke can be produced from waste pecan shells, resulting in chicken breast with similar yield, texture, moisture retention, and acceptability as that smoked with hickory, mesquite, or apple tree wood.