Risk factors for small bowel bleeding in chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

Proton Pump Inhibitors Increase the Risk of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-Related Small-Bowel Injury: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting results exist on the association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related small-bowel damage. The aim of this study was to determine whether PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small-bowel damage by meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from the time the database was created until March 31, 2022, for studies reporting associations between PPI use and outcomes, including the endoscopy-verified prevalence of small-bowel injury, mean number of small-bowel injuries per patient, change in hemoglobin level, and risk of small-bowel bleeding in subjects taking NSAIDs. Meta-analytical calculations for odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were performed with the random-effects model and interpreted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 1996 subjects were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that concomitant use of PPIs significantly increased the prevalence and number of endoscopy-verified small-bowel injuries (prevalence: OR = 3.00; 95% CI: 1.74-5.16; number: MD = 2.30; 95% CI: 0.61-3.99) and decreased hemoglobin levels (MD = -0.50 g/dL; 95% CI: 0.88 to -0.12) in NSAID users but did not change the risk of small-bowel bleeding (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.80-1.92). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that PPIs significantly increased the prevalence of small-bowel injury in subjects taking nonselective NSAIDs (OR = 7.05; 95% CI: 4.70-10.59, 4 studies, I 2 = 0) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 4.00; 95% CI: 1.18-13.60, 1 study, no calculated I 2 ) when compared with COX-2 inhibitors alone.

DISCUSSION

PPIs increased the risk of NSAID-related small-bowel damage, and the clinical significance of higher prevalence of small-bowel injuries should be studied in the future.

Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events associated with NSAIDs

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most prescribed pharmacological groups, especially in elderly patients.

AREAS COVERED

The main GI and CV adverse events associated with NSAID use are reviewed. Risk factors and prophylactic strategies are also covered.

EXPERT OPINION

COX-2 selective agents are safer to the GI tract but have a worst CV profile. On the contrary, naproxen seems safer for CV system, but it is one of the NSAIDs with higher GI toxicity. Co-therapy with aspirin reduces the GI benefits of COX-2 selective agents, whereas ibuprofen and naproxen may neglect the antiplatelet effect of aspirin. NSAIDs increase the risk of both upper and lower GI complications. Co-therapy with PPI reduces the risk of upper but not lower GI complications, and seems to induce dysbiosis in the small bowel, which may be implicated in the damage induced by NSAIDs. Celecoxib, a COX-2 selective agent, seems safer for both the upper and the lower GI tract. Prescription of type and dose of NSAIDs must be individualized based on the stratification of the CV and GI risk of patients.

Small Bowel Angioectasias Rebleeding and the Identification of Higher Risk Patients

BACKGROUND

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the gold standard for suspected small bowel bleeding (SBB). Angioectasias are the most common vascular anomalies in the gastrointestinal tract and have been reported as the source of SBB in up to 80% of patients. Considering their frequency, their usual intermittent bleeding nature, and their risk of rebleeding, the aim of this study was to identify some features and possible predictors of rebleeding in the presence of these lesions.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, which included consecutive SBCE with angioectasias between April 2008 and December 2017 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Rebleeding was defined as a drop of hemoglobin ≥ 2 g/dl and/or in the presence of hematochezia or melenas with negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy. Data were collected from medical records, and angioectasias were classified by number, location, size, and type. Univariate and multivariable statistical analysis was performed to identify possible predictors of rebleeding.

RESULTS

From a total of 630 patients submitted to SBCE for suspected SBB, 129 with angioectasias were included; 59.7% were female, with a median age of 72 (19-91) years old and a mean follow-up of 44.0 ± 31.9 months. In 32.6% (n = 42) of the patients, at least one episode of rebleeding was documented. The presence of heart failure (OR 3.41; IC95% 1.18-9.89; p = 0.024), the size of the angioectasias (OR 5.41; IC95% 2.15-13.6; p < 0.001), and smoking status (OR 3.15; IC95% 1.07-9.27; p = 0.038) were independent predictor factors of rebleeding.

CONCLUSION

Heart failure, smoking status, and angioectasias with a size superior to 5 mm are independent predictor factors of rebleeding in a population with angioectasias diagnosed by SBCE.

NSAID-induced small intestinal mucosal injury: Mechanism, prevention and treatment

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in clinical practice. It was well known in the past that the main side effect of NSAIDs was gastric mucosal injury. However, with the advancement of the diagnostic and therapeutic technology, NSAIDs have been found to cause much more severe damage to the small intestinal mucosa than we expected in recent years. Therefore, it is of great significance to elucidate the mechanism for NSAIDs to cause small intestinal mucosal injury to aid the clinical prevention and treatment of this condition. This paper aims to review the progress in the research of the mechanism, prevention, and treatment of NSAID-induced small intestinal mucosal injury.

Screening for Gastric and Small Intestinal Mucosal Injury with Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Asymptomatic Patients Taking Enteric-Coated Aspirin

Objective

To investigate gastric and small intestinal mucosal injury in asymptomatic patients taking enteric-coated aspirin using magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy.

Methods

Patients taking enteric-coated aspirin (aspirin group) and healthy controls (control group) were recruited from Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, between September 2017 and May 2018, and undertook magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy.

Results

Twenty-six subjects were recruited to the aspirin group and twenty-six to the control group; the median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale scores were 3.50 and 3.00 (P = 0.200), the median gastric Lanza scores were 2.50 and 1.00 (P < 0.001), the small intestinal Lanza scores were 1.00 and 0.00 (P < 0.001), the gastric controlled examination times were 50.0 and 51.0 min (P = 0.171), the small intestinal transit times were 240.0 and 238.0 min (P = 0.654), and the capsule excretion times were 24.0 and 24.0 hours (P = 0.956), respectively.

Conclusions

Rates of gastric and small intestinal mucosal injuries were significantly higher in patients without obvious gastrointestinal symptoms taking enteric-coated aspirin compared to healthy controls. Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy constitutes a safe, real-time screening modality for gastric and small intestinal mucosal injury in patients taking enteric-coated aspirin.

Characteristics of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)-Induced Small Bowel Injury Identified by Single-Balloon Endoscopy or Capsule Endoscopy

BACKGROUND The special features of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) enteropathy were partially clarified by single-balloon endoscopy(SBE). We aimed to investigate the characteristics of NSAIDs injuries that were differ from other ulcer diseases and efficacy of SBE compared with capsule endoscopy(CE). MATERIAL AND METHODS 1,644 symptomatic patients (221 patients taking NSAIDs) hospitalized between January 2006 and March 2016 were recruited and underwent SBE and/or CE. RESULTS NSAIDs damages were identified in 110 patients (49.77%). The special features of NSAIDs lesions included: variform, superficial, multiple and irregular arrangement; <1 cm in diameter (67.27%); the location in jejunum and ileum was similar; ileocecal valve was rarely influenced (20.91%). The specificity and positive predictive value of SBE for diagnosing NSAIDs breaks were higher than CE (95.74% vs. 80.00%; 95.45% vs. 81.63%, p<0.05). There were no differences in the detection rate and the diagnostic accuracy rate of small bowel diseases between SBE and CE in the NSAIDs group (69.4% vs. 66.3% and 83.58% vs. 80.65%, p>0.05 respectively). The consistency in diagnosing NSAIDs breaks for the 2 methods was 82.61%. More tiny lesions at the distal ileum were detected by SBE. Four patients misdiagnosed by CE got accurate diagnose through biopsy by SBE. Three patients with active bleeding caused by NSAIDs-induced ulcers underwent hemostasis successfully by SBE. CONCLUSIONS NSAIDs injuries might be distinguished from other diseases by endoscopic features and biopsy through SBE, which appeared to be an effective method for diagnosis and treatment.

Review article: a practical approach to the clinical management of NSAID enteropathy

Co-prescription of acid suppressive therapy, together with advances in small bowel imaging techniques, have shifted the burden of NSAID-related toxicity from gastro-duodenal to more distal small bowel injury. Due to predominantly subclinical disease, NSAID enteropathy remains under-recognised, with an incidence of 53-80% amongst healthy short-term users, and a prevalence of 50-71% following long-term (>3 months) use. Despite their distinct pathogenesis, those at risk of NSAID-related gastro-duodenal and small bowel complications share several risk factors. Clinical complications of NSAID enteropathy such as protein-losing enteropathy, small bowel strictures and diaphragm disease, confer significant morbidity, and are often irreversible. Small bowel prophylaxis has proven of modest efficacy after short-term, high-dose NSAID use in asymptomatic patients. While selective COX-2 inhibitors are associated with fewer gastro-duodenal complications relative to non-selective NSAIDs, their comparative benefit in protecting against small bowel enteropathy remains unclear. Prophylaxis should be considered in those at high risk of small bowel complications, as treatment options for established disease remain limited; however, the optimal agent remains unclear. We propose a clinical algorithm that may help prevent, monitor, investigate, and manage the sequelae of NSAID-induced small bowel toxicity.