Practice guidance for diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis-related splanchnic vein thrombosis (Shenyang, 2020)

Anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis increases bleeding risk without improving outcomes

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Treatment guidelines on anticoagulation (AC) to treat splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) after acute pancreatitis (AP) are not well-established. This research examines the efficacy and safety of AC in SVT.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the demographics, clinical progression, radiologic findings, interventions, and outcomes of patients with AP between 2018 and 2022 at a single tertiary care center. The primary and secondary outcomes were development of SVT in AP and effects of AC, respectively.

RESULTS

897 patients developed AP (average 50.5 years old, 46% female, 20% moderately severe AP, 4% severe AP), of whom 4.8% developed SVT. SVT was associated with recurrent and chronic pancreatitis (28%, p = 0.021 and 37%, p < 0.001) and malignancy (21%, p < 0.001). SVT was associated with severe pancreatitis courses (12% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and an increase in six-month mortality (14% vs. 4%, p = 0.022). AC was used for 47% of patients with SVT. However, AC did not prevent SVT sequelae, including gastroesophageal varices formation (p = 1), variceal hemorrhage (p = 0.68), or splenic infarction (p = 1), and did not improve survival (p = 0.19). While AC did not improve outcomes, it was associated with bleeding episodes in 50% of patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of patients who develop SVT after AP receive AC despite no reduction in adverse events or mortality. Additionally, half of patients receiving AC experience bleeding complications. The limited evidence presented in this study suggests that the risks of AC for SVT in AP may outweigh its benefits and highlights the need for future studies in larger prospective cohorts.

Venous Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis: What to and Not to Do?

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas that has not only local but systemic effects as well. Venous thrombosis is one such complication which can give rise to thrombosis of the peripheral vasculature in the form of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and splanchnic vein thrombosis. The prevalence of these complications increases with the severity of the disease and adds to the adverse outcomes profile. With better imaging and awareness, more cases are being detected, although many at times it can be an incidental finding. However, it remains understudied and strangely, most of the guidelines on the management of acute pancreatitis are silent on this aspect. This review offers an overview of the incidence, pathophysiology, symptomatology, diagnostic work-up, and management of venous thrombosis that develops in AP.

Management of Sinistral Portal Hypertension after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Sinistral, or left-sided, portal hypertension (SPH) is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage resulting from obstruction of the splenic vein. Venous drainage from the spleen via collaterals can result in venous hemorrhage into both the retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal spaces due to increased venous blood pressure in peripancreatic and gastroduodenal vasculature. SPH can occur secondary to pancreatitis with thrombosis of the splenic vein. Another possible cause is the surgical ligation of the splenic vein as part of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although splenectomy has been traditionally considered as the treatment of choice to relieve venous hypertension, individual concepts for each patient have to be developed. Considering the venous collateral drainage pathways, a comprehensive approach involving surgical, endoscopic, and interventional radiology interventions may be necessary to address the underlying cause of variceal bleeding. Among these approaches, splenic artery embolization (SAE) has demonstrated efficacy in mitigating the adverse effects associated with elevated venous outflow pressure.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes key imaging findings in SPH patients after PD and highlights the potential of minimally invasive embolization for curative treatment of variceal hemorrhage.

KEY MESSAGES

(i) SPH is a potential consequence after major pancreas surgery. (ii) Collateral flow can lead to life-threatening abdominal bleeding. (iii) Depending on the origin and localization of the bleeding, a dedicated management is required, frequently involving interventional radiology techniques.

[Interventional radiological and endoscopic technologies in diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis]

This review is devoted to internationally accepted diagnostic algorithms for complicated chronic pancreatitis (CP). In addition, the authors discuss interventional radiological and endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, as well as their role in surgical approaches for this disease. Chronic pancreatitis is often diagnosed with severe symptoms following severe course of disease and complications. Imaging techniques, such as ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, CT, MRI/MR cholangiocreatography (MRCP), secretin-stimulated MRCP, are valuable to assess the pancreas in patients with initial manifestations of CP. Modern treatment of complicated CP includes transpapillary or transmural drainage of false cysts, shock wave lithotripsy and stenting for pancreatic duct strictures and/or stones, stenting for biliary hypertension, endovascular interventions for vascular complications and radical surgical treatment. Endoscopic methods are preferable regarding better short-term quality of life. Early surgical intervention (within 3 years after clinical manifestation) is effective to eliminate or significantly reduce pain and pancreatic insufficiency. Multidisciplinary team including surgeons, endoscopists and interventional radiologists should determine the most optimal diagnostic and treatment approach individually for each patient.

A narrative review of acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis: from pathogenesis to clinical management

Acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis (APISVT) is an important sequela complication of acute pancreatitis, which may cause poor prognosis, such as severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bowel ischemic necrosis and liver failure. However, its mechanism remains uncertain, and there is not a general consensus on the management. In this study, we reviewed the latest academic publications in APISVT, and discussed its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, adverse outcome and treatment, especially focused on the role of anticoagulant therapy. It was indicated that anticoagulation therapy can significantly elevate thrombus recanalization and reduce the incidence of complications and mortality with no increase of bleeding. Actually, as most of these studies were retrospective analyses and prospective studies included small samples, the conclusion remains controversial. Thus, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urged to verify the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy for APISVT.

Determinants and impact of splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a well-recognised though little-studied complication in acute pancreatitis (AP). SVT risk factors, its clinical consequences and the role of anticoagulation (AC) therapy is scarce.

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence and natural history of SVT in AP.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study involving 23 hospitals in Spain. AP complications were identified by computer tomography, and patients with SVT were re-evaluated after two years.

RESULTS

A total of 1655 patients with AP were included. The overall incidence of SVT was 3.6%. SVT was significantly associated with male gender, younger age and alcoholic aetiology. Every local complication increased SVT incidence, and this risk rose gradually with larger extension and infection of necrosis. These patients had a longer hospital stay and underwent a greater number of invasive treatments, regardless of AP severity. Forty-six patients with SVT were followed up. SVT resolution rate was 54.5% in the AC group and 30.8% in the non-AC group with lower thrombotic complications in the SVT resolution group (83.3% vs 22.7%; p<0.001). No AC-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the risk factors and negative clinical impact of SVT in AP. Our results justify future trials to demonstrate the role of AC in this clinical scenario.

Chronic Pancreatitis-Induced Thrombosis of Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Artery

Every year, nearly 60,000 hospitalizations occur in the United States due to chronic pancreatitis (CP). CP can cause severe chronic abdominal pain, pancreatic insufficiency, and increased risk of pancreatic cancer. While venous thrombotic complications are common, arterial thrombotic events are rarely reported in CP. This report describes a case of a 43-year-old female who presented with severe worsening abdominal pain due to CP. Diagnostic imaging disclosed thrombosis of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and celiac artery (CA) with acute bowel wall changes reflecting ischemic changes, resulting in acute-on-chronic mesenteric ischemia. Endovascular stent placement relieved the ischemia with the resolution of pain. Arterial thrombosis should be considered as a diagnostic possibility when patients with CP present with a significant change in symptoms. Importantly, the case demonstrates that endovascular treatment with stent placement can relieve ischemia and resolve symptoms in patients with CP.

Vascular complications of chronic pancreatitis and its management

Chronic pancreatitis is a chronic fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas, resulting in recurrent abdominal pain, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition. It may lead to various other complications such as pseudocyst formation, benign biliary stricture, gastric outlet obstruction; and vascular complications like venous thrombosis, variceal and pseudoaneurysmal bleed. Development of varices is usually due to chronic venous thrombosis with collateral formation and variceal bleeding can easily be tackled by endoscopic therapy. Pseudoaneurysmal bleed can be catastrophic and requires radiological interventions including digital subtraction angiography followed by endovascular obliteration, or sometimes with a percutaneous or an endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach in technically difficult situations. Procedure-related bleed is usually venous and mostly managed conservatively. Procedure-related arterial bleed, however, may require radiological interventions.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus systemic anticoagulation in the treatment of symptomatic splanchnic venous thrombosis secondary to acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has been an important therapy and seems effective in patients with splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT) secondary to some diseases, but this intervention hasn't been formally evaluated in the setting of acute pancreatitis (AP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study enrolled patients between January 2013 and December 2018. AP patients who developed SVT-induced symptoms, including intractable ascites and/or enteral nutrition intolerance, were included. Demographics, SVT associated parameters, clinical features and outcomes, long-term quality of life evaluated by using SF-36 questionnaire were compared between CDT group and systemic anticoagulation (SAC) group.

RESULTS

6 patients underwent CDT and 17 received SAC. Patients in CDT group had a higher recanalization rate (100% versus 35.3%; p = 0.014) and shorter time to symptoms resolution (median 8 days versus. 31.5 days, p = 0.004). Mortality and length of hospital stay were comparable between two groups. The association analysis indicated that CDT use exerted a significantly beneficial effect on recanalization rate (risk ratio, 2.833; 95% CI, 1.489 to 5.393; p = 0.002) and time to symptoms resolution (mean difference, -33.333; 95% CI, -64.612 to -2.055; p = 0.038). No SVT-related symptoms recurrence was recorded in survivors at six-month follow-up. There was no statistical difference in either item of SF-36 questionnaire between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SAC, CDT may facilitate vascular recanalization and shorten symptom resolution for symptomatic SVT.

Predictive value of D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation product for splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Early diagnosis of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) after severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains difficult because of its insidious onset. Common serum markers for thrombosis such as D-dimer (D-D) have lost their diagnostic value due to their elevation in non-thrombotic patients with SAP. The aim of this study is to predict SVT after SAP using common serum indicators of thrombosis by establishing a new cut-off value.

METHODS

177 SAP patients were included in a retrospective cohort study from September 2019 to September 2021. Patient demographics, dynamic changes of coagulation and fibrinolysis indicators were collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to assess potential risk factors for the development of SVT in SAP patients. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the predictive value of independent risk factors. Moreover, clinical complications and outcomes were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Among 177 SAP patients, 32 (18.1%) developed SVT. The most common cause of SAP was biliary (49.8%), followed by hypertriglyceridemia (21.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that D-D (OR, 1.135; 95%CI, 1.043-1.236; p = 0.003) and fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) (OR, 1.037; 95%CI, 1.015-1.060; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for SVT development in patients with SAP. The area under ROC curve for D-D was 0.891 (p = 0.003, sensitivity= 95.3%, specificity = 74.1%) at a cut-off value of 6.475, and the area under ROC curve for FDP was 0.858 (p = 0.001, sensitivity = 89.4%, specificity = 72.4%) at a cut-off value of 23.155.

CONCLUSION

D-D and FDP are significant independent risk factors with high predictive value for SVT in patients with SAP.

Therapeutic anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: A national survey and case-vignette study

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a major complication of moderate and severe acute pancreatitis. There is no consensus on whether therapeutic anticoagulation should be started in patients with acute pancreatitis and SVT.

AIM

To gain insight into current opinions and clinical decision making of pancreatologists regarding SVT in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

A total of 139 pancreatologists of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group were approached to complete an online survey and case vignette survey. The threshold to assume group agreement was set at 75%.

RESULTS

The response rate was 67% (n = 93). Seventy-one pancreatologists (77%) regularly prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation in case of SVT, and 12 pancreatologists (13%) for narrowing of splanchnic vein lumen. The most common reason to treat SVT was to avoid complications (87%). Acute thrombosis was the most important factor to prescribe therapeutic anticoagulation (90%). Portal vein thrombosis was chosen as the most preferred location to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation (76%) and splenic vein thrombosis as the least preferred location (86%). The preferred initial agent was low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; 87%). In the case vignettes, therapeutic anticoagulation was prescribed for acute portal vein thrombosis, with or without suspected infected necrosis (82% and 90%), and thrombus progression (88%). Agreement was lacking regarding the selection and duration of long-term anticoagulation, the indication for thrombophilia testing and upper endoscopy, and about whether risk of bleeding is a major barrier for therapeutic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

In this national survey, the pancreatologists seemed to agree on the use of therapeutic anticoagulation, using LMWH in the acute phase, for acute portal thrombosis and in the case of thrombus progression, irrespective of the presence of infected necrosis.

Mortality Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis Patients: A Propensity-Matched National Study

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis (AP) and might be associated with worse outcomes. We aimed to study trends, outcomes, and predictors of PVT in AP patients.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the adult patients (≥ 18 years) with primary diagnosis of AP from 2004 to 2013 using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision. Patients with and without PVT were entered into propensity matching model based on baseline variables. Outcomes were compared between both groups and predictors of PVT in AP were identified.

RESULTS

Among the total of 2,389,337 AP cases, 7046 (0.3%) had associated PVT. The overall mortality of AP decreased throughout the study period (p trend ≤ 0.0001), whereas mortality of AP with PVT remained stable (1-5.7%, p trend = 0.3). After propensity matching, AP patients with PVT patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (3.3% vs. 1.2%), AKI (13.4% vs. 7.7%), shock (6.9% vs. 2.5%), and need for mechanical ventilation (9.2% vs. 2.5%) along with mean higher cost of hospitalization and length of stay (p < 0.001 for all). Lower age (Odd ratio [OR] 0.99), female (OR 0.75), and gallstone pancreatitis (OR 0.79) were negative predictors, whereas alcoholic pancreatitis (OR 1.51), cirrhosis (OR 2.19), CCI > 2 (OR 1.81), and chronic pancreatitis (OR 2.28) were positive predictors of PVT (p < 0.001 for all) in AP patients.

CONCLUSION

PVT in AP is associated with significantly higher risk of death, AKI, shock, and need for mechanical ventilation. Chronic and alcoholic pancreatitis is associated with higher risk of PVT in AP.

Anticoagulation Therapy for Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Associated With Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is not rare in patients with acute pancreatitis. It remains unclear about whether anticoagulation should be given for acute pancreatitis-associated SVT. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Rates of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, intestinal ischemia, portal cavernoma, and gastroesophageal varices were pooled and compared between patients with acute pancreatitis-associated SVT who received and did not receive therapeutic anticoagulation. Pooled rates and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated. Overall, 16 studies including 698 patients with acute pancreatitis-associated SVT were eligible. After therapeutic anticoagulation, the pooled rates of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, intestinal ischemia, portal cavernoma, and gastroesophageal varices were 44.3% (95%CI = 32.3%-56.6%), 10.7% (95%CI = 4.9%-18.5%), 13.3% (95%CI = 6.9%-21.4%), 16.8% (95%CI = 6.9%-29.9%), 21.2% (95%CI = 7.5%-39.5%), and 29.1% (95%CI = 16.1%-44.1%), respectively. Anticoagulation therapy significantly increased the rate of SVT recanalization (RR = 1.69; 95%CI = 1.29-2.19; P < .01), and marginally increased the risk of bleeding (RR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.93-4.22; P = .07). The rates of death (RR = 1.42; 95%CI = 0.62-3.25; P = .40), intestinal ischemia (RR = 2.55; 95%CI = 0.23-28.16; P = .45), portal cavernoma (RR = 0.51; 95%CI = 0.21-1.22; P = .13), and gastroesophageal varices (RR = 0.71; 95%CI = 0.38-1.32; P = .28) were not significantly different between patients who received and did not receive anticoagulation therapy. Heterogeneity was statistically significant in the meta-analysis of intestinal ischemia, but not in those of SVT recanalization, any bleeding, death, portal cavernoma, or gastroesophageal varices. Anticoagulation may be effective for recanalization of acute pancreatitis-associated SVT, but cannot improve the survival. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the clinical significance of anticoagulation therapy in such patients.

Brachiocephalic to left brachial vein thrombotic vasculitis accompanying mediastinal pancreatic fistula: A case report

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is a severe inflammatory pancreatic disease commonly due to bile duct stones or excessive alcohol usage, with clinical manifestations of abdominal pain, nausea, fever, and fluid collections. Healthy persons with less symptomatic pancreatitis are quite rare. Herein, we report a case of a patient with an undetermined onset of pancreatitis mimicking left arm cellulitis due to thrombotic vasculitis of the brachiocephalic vein.

CASE SUMMARY

A 50-year-old woman visited our hospital for tenderness in the left arm over several recent days. She was diagnosed with cellulitis on the left arm due to left elbow tenderness. Intravenous antibiotics administration did not improve symptoms and laboratory data worsened; thus, chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed. CT demonstrated pancreatitis with pseudocyst around the pancreas extending to the mediastinum. Thrombotic vasculitis of the brachiocephalic to left brachial vein was observed, which could be the cause of left elbow pain. A pancreatic fistula was found in the head of the pancreas by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, so a pancreatic cyst drainage tube via the duodenum was placed in the pseudocyst. Cyst content culture was positive for Escherichia coli infection. Clinical symptoms, imaging findings, and inflammatory reactions resolved gradually after starting therapeutic intervention. The mediastinal pancreatic pseudocysts shrunk, and the venous thrombi remained but shrunk.

CONCLUSION

The case of a patient with pancreatitis with an undetermined onset that mimics left arm cellulitis is reported. Deep vein thrombosis should be kept in mind when treating patients with severe inflammatory disease.

Management of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis: An International Survey of Current Practice

OBJECTIVES

Splanchnic venous thrombosis (SpVT) is a complication of acute pancreatitis (AP). There is scarce literature on the prevalence and treatment of SpVT in AP. The aim of this international survey was to document current approaches to the management of SpVT in patients with AP.

METHODS

An online survey was designed by a group of international experts in the management of AP. Twenty-eight questions covered the level of experience of the respondents, disease demographics, and management of SpVT.

RESULTS

There were 224 respondents from 25 countries. Most respondents (92.4%, n = 207) were from tertiary hospitals and predominantly consultants (attendings, 86.6%, n = 194). More than half of the respondents (57.2%, n = 106) "routinely" prescribed prophylactic anticoagulation for AP. Less than half of the respondents (44.3%, n = 82) "routinely" prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation for SpVT. A clinical trial was considered justified by most respondents (85.4%, n = 157) and 73.2% (n = 134) would be willing to enroll their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach to anticoagulation in the treatment of patients with SpVT complicating AP was highly variable. Respondents indicate that a position of equipoise exists to justify randomized evaluation.

Splenic artery embolization for treatment of portal hypertension due to essential thrombocythemia

Philadelphia‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are significantly associated with the development of splanchnic vein thrombosis, which leads to portal hypertension. Here, we report two rare cases of portal hypertension caused by essential thrombocythemia (a type of MPN). Splenic artery embolization was performed to prevent variceal rebleeding, and during follow‐up, no rebleeding occurred in these two cases.

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Complicated by Multiple Splanchnic Venous Thromboses and Bilateral Renal Infarctions in a Patient With Recent COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a well-known complication of pancreatitis, but extra-splanchnic thrombosis is rarely seen. We report a case of acute necrotizing pancreatitis complicated by portal vein thrombosis and resultant hepatic infarction, splenic vein thrombosis, bilateral renal infarction, and bowel hypoperfusion in an 81-year-old man with recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of such extensive intra-abdominal thromboses complicating severe acute pancreatitis. Despite multi-organ support and systemic anticoagulation, he deteriorated into multiple organ failure and died after 72 hours. He had no prior history of thrombotic disorders. COVID-19 infection can cause sustained prothrombotic changes, while severe acute pancreatitis also produces an inflammatory response that promotes coagulation. Together, the two concurrent disease processes may have resulted in the particularly extensive intra-abdominal thromboses and infarctions seen in this patient. Physicians should be mindful of the elevated risk of severe vascular complications in acute pancreatitis patients with concurrent or recent COVID-19 infection.

Vascular complications of pancreatitis

More than 200000 hospital admissions happen per year for acute pancreatitis and more than 50000 for chronic pancreatitis in the United States of America. Necrotizing pancreatitis accounts for 20%-30% of the cases. One-quarter of the patients with pancreatitis develop vascular complications, which carries a high mortality. This mini-review will address these complications that can help primary care physicians and hospitalists in managing their patients effectively.

Case Report: Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis as a Complication of Necrotizing Acute Pancreatitis in a Pediatric Patient

Splanchnic vein thrombosis is an unusual manifestation of venous thromboembolism and includes portal vein thrombosis, mesenteric veins thrombosis, splenic vein thrombosis, and the Budd-Chiari syndrome. The most common risk factors include hematologic and autoimmune disorders, hormonal therapy, liver cirrhosis, solid abdominal cancer, recent abdominal surgery, and abdominal infections or inflammatory conditions, such as pancreatitis. Splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis is most commonly associated with the severe form of the disease and pancreatic necrosis. This report describes a case of splanchnic vein thrombosis as a complication of necrotizing acute pancreatitis in a pediatric patient. Splanchnic vein thrombosis was incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced computed tomography to assess the pancreas. There was no evidence of prior risk factors for the thrombotic condition. The patient was treated with anticoagulation and showed complete resolution after recovery from necrotizing acute pancreatitis, at a 16-month follow-up. The complication of necrotizing acute pancreatitis with splanchnic vein thrombosis in pediatric age is a rare presentation.

Incidence and treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with acute pancreatitis and assess the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation.

METHODS

Systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were undertaken to identify studies reporting the incidence and outcomes associated with SVT in patients with acute pancreatitis. The pooled incidence, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. PROSPERO database registration no. CRD 42021230912.

RESULTS

Only 18 of the 238 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. Of the 943 patients who had SVT, 264 (28.0%) received anticoagulation. The pooled incidence of SVT at first presentation of acute pancreatitis was 15% (95% CI 5 to 26%), but was 17% (95% CI 14 to 20%) in all studies. Recanalization was more likely to occur in the anticoagulation-treated than in the untreated group (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.83, P = 0.007). There were no differences in hemorrhagic complications (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.81 to 6.37, P = 0.12) or overall mortality (OR 2.37, 95% CI 0.86 to 6.52, P = 0.10) in relation to the use of anticoagulation. The overall incidence of portal hypertension in patients was 60% (95% CI 55 to 65%). However, it was not possible to determine the incidence in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of SVT in patients with acute pancreatitis is significant. Treatment with anticoagulants improved the odds of recanalization but did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications or overall mortality.

Two-step complete splenic artery embolization for the management of symptomatic sinistral portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) is a rare clinical syndrome. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes and safety of splenic artery embolization (SAE) in the treatment of SPH.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 39 SPH patients who underwent SAE treatment between August 2009 and May 2021. The cases had esophageal, gastric, or ectopic varices detected by endoscopy or enhanced CT, with symptoms or signs of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and/or postprandial fullness. Clinical symptom improvement rate, complications, and symptomatic recurrence rate were observed and analyzed after treatment.

RESULTS

All the procedures were performed successfully. Of all patients, 17 received the 2-step complete SAE procedure, 19 received only the first step of the 2-step protocol (i.e., partial splenic embolization [PSE] procedure), and the remaining three received the 1-step complete SAE procedure. After the procedures, the symptoms completely disappeared in all patients, and the main complications were post-embolization syndromes, with 27 patients (69.2%) developing a low-grade fever, 24 (61.5%) developing abdominal pain and 4 (10.3%) developing nausea or mild vomiting. During the prolonged follow-up, varicose veins were gradually reduced as detected by enhanced CT; liver function parameters and platelet count remained in the normal range. Only one patient who underwent PSE treatment developed upper GI rebleeding 7 months after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Two-step complete SAE is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of symptomatic SPH.

Chemoprophylaxis to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients Hospitalized for Pancreatitis: Beneficial or Harmful?

Introduction: Vascular complications in pancreatitis generally occur in the form of hemorrhage or thrombosis. Pancreatitis resulting in splanchnic thrombosis has been well studied, but the cause of this correlation has not been studied in the current era of increasing anticoagulant use for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Hemorrhagic pancreatitis and peri-pancreatic bleeding are also known phenomena encountered in relation to pancreatitis, but these risks are not well established in the setting of chemical prophylaxis for DVT.

Objectives: Our objective was to identify whether chemical DVT prophylaxis in pancreatitis harms the patient by increasing the risk of hemorrhagic conversion of pancreatitis or peri-pancreatic hemorrhage or if it is beneficial by preventing splanchnic venous thrombosis in the abdominal vasculature that surrounds the pancreas.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective chart review with approval from the Institutional Review Board on patients who were hospitalized for or developed pancreatitis during their hospital stay from April 2014 to July 2015. We reviewed the charts for imaging suggestive of venous thrombosis or the development of intra-abdominal hemorrhage at admission during hospitalization and within 30 days after hospitalization. We also reviewed the methods of DVT prophylaxis to identify any correlation with the risk of hemorrhage or thrombosis. A bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis score was used within 24 hours of admission to calculate the severity of the patients’ pancreatitis. The data collected were analyzed for descriptive statistics, correlation using Pearson’s coefficient, and multivariate regression analysis using Microsoft Excel and SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Results: This study included 389 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 74.6% of patients received chemical prophylaxis, mostly low molecular weight heparin, and 18.5% of patients were not on chemical or mechanical means of DVT prophylaxis. Only 12 patients (3%) had complications related to thrombosis and hemorrhage. Seven patients had splanchnic venous thrombosis, one had a hemorrhagic conversion of pancreatitis, three had a peri-pancreatic hemorrhage, and one had both the hemorrhagic conversion of pancreatitis and peri-pancreatic hemorrhage. Ten patients out of 12 patients had complications before admission, and nine of the 12 patients were on chemical prophylaxis. Pearson’s coefficient showed no statistically significant correlation between the incidence of complications and the use of chemical DVT prophylaxis. Multivariate analysis showed no specific variable that increased the risk of complications.

Conclusions: Our study showed that chemoprophylaxis for DVT in patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis is neither harmful by causing hemorrhagic conversion of pancreatitis, peri-pancreatic hemorrhage nor beneficial by preventing splanchnic venous thrombosis.

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis and Its Consequences

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a serious vascular complication that can occur in patients with acute pancreatitis. We assessed the incidence of SVT and its relationship with acute pancreatitis (AP) and associated complications. We carried out a retrospective analysis of medical histories from patients hospitalized with AP in a single surgical center. Histories were acquired from patients with abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans performed between the 2nd and 3rd day of hospitalization. We assessed the impact and extent of thrombosis over the disease course. We found a strong positive correlation (Cramer’s V coefficient = 0.34) between SVT and disease severity. Mortality in the study group was 7.2% (8 patients) of which 5 patients (62.5%) were diagnosed with SVT. We observed an increased incidence of death among patients with thrombosis, with results approaching significance (P = 0.056). In our study, we found that SVT has a negative effect on the course of AP and is associated with more severe disease and increased mortality.