Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for rapid broad-spectrum detection of bloodstream infections

Clinical evaluation of droplet digital pcr for suspected ascites infection in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is increasingly used in diagnosing clinical pathogens, but its effectiveness in cirrhosis patients with suspected ascites infection remains uncertain.

METHODS

The diagnostic performance of ddPCR was assessed in 305 ascites samples, utilizing culture and clinical composite standards. The quantitative value and potential clinical impact of ddPCR were further analyzed in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

RESULTS

With culture standards, ddPCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 83.2% for bacterial or fungal detection. After adjustment of clinical composite criteria, specificity increased to 96.4%. Better diagnostic performance for all types of targeted pathogens, particularly fungi, was observed with ddPCR compared to culture, and more polymicrobial infections were detected (30.4% versus 5.7%, p < 0.001). Pathogen loads detected by ddPCR correlated with white blood cell count in ascites and blood, as well as polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) count in ascites, reflecting infection status rapidly. A positive clinical impact of 55.8% (43/77) was observed for ddPCR, which was more significant among patients with PMN count ≤ 250/mm3 in terms of medication adjustment and new diagnosis. ddPCR results for fungal detection were confirmed by clinical symptoms and other microbiological tests, which could guide antifungal therapy and reduce the risk of short-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

ddPCR, with appropriate panel design, has advantages in pathogen detection and clinical management of ascites infection, especially for patients with fungal and polymicrobial infections. Patients with atypical spontaneous bacterial peritonitis benefited more from ddPCR.

Development of a multiplex PCR assay and quantification of microbial markers by ddPCR for identification of saliva and vaginal fluid

The identification of biological fluids at crime scenes contributes to crime scene reconstruction and provides investigative leads. Traditional methods for body fluid identification are limited in terms of sensitivity and are mostly presumptive. Emerging methods based on mRNA and DNA methylation require high quality template source. An exploitable characteristic of body fluids is their distinct microbial profiles allowing for the discrimination of body fluids based on microbiome content. Microbial DNA is highly abundant within the body, robust and stable and can persist in the environment long after human DNA has degraded. 16S rRNA sequencing is the gold standard for microbial analysis; however, NGS is costly, and requires intricate workflows and interpretation. Also, species level resolution is not always achievable. Based on the current challenges, the first objective of this study was to develop a multiplex conventional PCR assay to identify vaginal fluid and saliva by targeting species-specific 16S rRNA microbial markers. The second objective was to employ droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a novel approach to quantify bacterial species alone and in a mixture of body fluids. Lactobacillus crispatus and Streptococcus salivarius were selected because of high abundance within vaginal fluid and saliva respectively. While Fusobacterium nucleatum and Gardnerella vaginalis, though present in healthy humans, are also frequently found in oral and vaginal infections, respectively. The multiplex PCR assay detected L. crispatus and G. vaginalis in vaginal fluid while F. nucleatum and S. salivarius was detected in saliva. Multiplex PCR detected F. nucleatum, S. salivarius and L. crispatus in mixed body fluid samples while, G. vaginalis was undetected in mixtures containing vaginal fluid. For samples exposed at room temperature for 65 days, L. crispatus and G. vaginalis were detected in vaginal swabs while only S. salivarius was detected in saliva swabs. The limit of detection was 0.06 copies/µl for F. nucleatum (2.5 ×10-9 ng/µl) and S. salivarius (2.5 ×10-6 ng/µl). L. crispatus and G. vaginalis had detection limits of 0.16 copies/µl (2.5 ×10-4 ng/µl) and 0.48 copies/µl (2.5 ×10-7 ng/µl). All 4 bacterial species were detected in mixtures and aged samples by ddPCR. No significant differences were observed in quantity of bacterial markers in saliva and vaginal fluid. The present research reports for the first time the combination of the above four bacterial markers for the detection of saliva and vaginal fluid and highlights the sensitivity of ddPCR for bacterial quantification in pure and mixed body fluids.

Clinical evaluation of droplet digital PCR in the early identification of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study

Background

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the causative agents is essential for clinical management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) that might induce sepsis/septic shock. A considerable number of suspected sepsis patients initially enter the health-care system through an emergency department (ED), hence it is vital to establish an early strategy to recognize sepsis and initiate prompt care in ED. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical value of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay in suspected sepsis patients in the ED.

Methods

This was a prospective single-centered observational study including patients admitted to the ED from 25 October 2022 to 3 June 2023 with suspected BSIs screened by Modified Shapiro Score (MSS) score. The comparison between ddPCR and blood culture (BC) was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ddPCR for BSIs. Meanwhile, correlative analysis between ddPCR and the inflammatory and prognostic-related biomarkers were conducted to explore the relevance. Further, the health economic evaluation of the ddPCR was analyzed.

Results

258 samples from 228 patients, with BC and ddPCR performed simultaneously, were included in this study. We found that ddPCR results were positive in 48.13% (103 of 214) of episodes, with identification of 132 pathogens. In contrast, BC only detected 18 positives, 88.89% of which were identified by ddPCR. When considering culture-proven BSIs, ddPCR shows an overall sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 55.61%, the optimal diagnostic power for quantifying BSI through ddPCR is achieved with a copy cutoff of 155.5. We further found that ddPCR exhibited a high accuracy especially in liver abscess patients. Among all the identified virus by ddPCR, EBV has a substantially higher positive rate with a link to immunosuppression. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity as well as prognosis. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs.

Conclusions

The multiplexed ddPCR delivers precise and quantitative load data on the causal pathogen, offers the ability to monitor the patient's condition and may serve as early warning of sepsis in time-urgent clinical situations as ED.

Importance

Early detection and effective administration of antibiotics are essential to improve clinical outcomes for those with life-threatening infection in the emergency department. ddPCR, an emerging tool for rapid and sensitive pathogen identification used as a precise bedside test, has developed to address the current challenges of BSI diagnosis and precise treatment. It characterizes sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and absolute quantifications without a standard curve. ddPCR can detect causative pathogens and related resistance genes in patients with suspected BSIs within a span of three hours. In addition, it can identify polymicrobial BSIs and dynamically monitor changes in pathogenic microorganisms in the blood and can be used to evaluate antibiotic efficacy and survival prognosis. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs.

Sensitive and rapid identification of pathogens by droplet digital PCR in a cohort of septic patients: a prospective diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

There is a critical need for a rapid and sensitive pathogen detection method for septic patients. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in identifying pathogens among suspected septic patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective pilot diagnostic study to clinically validate the multiplex ddPCR panel in diagnosing suspected septic patients. A total of 100 sepsis episodes of 89 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

In comparison to blood culture, the ddPCR panel exhibited an overall sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 69.7%, ddPCR yielded an additional detection rate of 17.0% for sepsis cases overall, with a turnaround time of 2.5 h. The sensitivity of ddPCR in the empirical antibiotic treatment and the non-empirical antibiotic treatment group were 78.6% versus 80.0% (p > 0.05). Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified in a total of 13 samples. Whenever ddPCR detected the genes beta-lactamase-Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (blaKPC) or beta-lactamase-New Delhi metallo (blaNDM), these findings corresponded to the cultivation of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Dynamic ddPCR monitoring revealed a consistent alignment between the quantitative ddPCR results and the trends observed in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to blood culture, ddPCR exhibited higher sensitivity for pathogen diagnosis in suspected septic patients, and it provided pathogen and drug resistance information in a shorter time. The quantitative results of ddPCR generally aligned with the trends seen in C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels, indicating that ddPCR can serve as a dynamic monitoring tool for pathogen load in septic patients.

A retrospective study of the detection of sepsis pathogens comparing blood culture and culture-independent digital PCR

Fast and precise identification of microorganisms in the early diagnosis of sepsis is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a highly sensitive approach for absolute quantification that can be utilized as a culture-independent molecular technique for diagnosing sepsis pathogens. We performed a retrospective investigation on 69 ICU patients suspected of sepsis. Our findings showed that a multiplex dPCR diagnostic kit outperformed blood culture in detecting the 15 most frequent bacteria that cause sepsis. Ninety-two bacterial strains were identified using dPCR at concentrations varying from 34 copies/mL to 105,800 copies/mL. The detection rate of dPCR was much greater than that of BC, with 27.53% (19/69) versus 73.91% (51/69). The sensitivity of dPCR was 63.2%. Our research indicated that dPCR outperforms blood culture in the early detection of sepsis-causing microorganisms. The diagnostic kit can detect a greater variety of pathogens with quantitative data, including polymicrobial infections, and has a quicker processing time. DPCR is a valuable technique that could aid in the proper management of sepsis.

Reliability of Droplet Digital PCR Alone and in Combination with Interleukin-6 and Procalcitonin for Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection

Purpose

Bloodstream infection(BSI) is linked with high mortality, underscoring the significance of prompt etiological diagnosis for timely and precise treatment. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction(ddPCR) in combination with conventional inflammatory markers [interleukin-6(IL-6) and procalcitonin(PCT)] concerning disease progression and treatment prognosis in BSI patients. Furthermore, the study aims to explore a more efficient clinical application strategy.

Patients and Methods

This prospective case seried study centers on 176 patients suspected of or confirmed with BSI. Blood samples were collected to extract nucleic acids for identifying pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and viruses) and determining copy loads via ddPCR.

Results

The sensitivity of ddPCR was markedly higher compared to the culture method (74.71% vs 31.03%). A positive correlation existed between bacterial load and levels of inflammatory markers [IL-6 (P=0.0182), PCT (P=0.0029), and CRP (P=0.0005)]. In suspected BSI cases, the combination of ddPCR and inflammatory markers could predict sepsis risk [ROC: Area under the curve(AUC)=0.6071, P=0.0383]. Within confirmed BSI patients, the ddPCR bacterial load of those with SOFA<7 was lower than that of the SOFA≥7 (P=0.0334). ddPCR (OR: 1.789, P=0.035) monitoring combined with PCT (OR: 1.787, P=0.035) holded predictive value for SOFA progression (AUC=0.7913, P=0.0003). Similarly, BSI survivors displayed a lower burden than non-survivors (P=0.0170). Additionally, ddPCR combinated with IL-6 provided a more accurate and expedited insight into clinical outcomes prediction for BSI confirmed patients (AUC=0.7352, P=0.0030). Serial monitoring of bacterial load by ddPCR effectively mirrored the clinical course of BSI in patients. Notably, patients with positive ddPCR virus infection exhibited significantly reduced lymphocyte counts (P=0.0003).

Conclusion

In a clinical context, qualitative ddPCR results and quantitative continuous monitoring can more precisely assess sepsis progression and treatment prognosis in BSI patients. Furthermore, ddPCR results offer quicker and more accurate reference points for clinical antibacterial and antiviral interventions.

Ready for new waves: optimizing SARS-CoV-2 variants monitoring in pooled samples with droplet digital PCR

Introduction

The declaration of the end of the Public Health Emergency for COVID-19 on May 11th, 2023, has shifted the global focus led by WHO and CDC towards monitoring the evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Augmenting these international endeavors with local initiatives becomes crucial to not only track the emergence of new variants but also to understand their spread. We present a cost-effective digital PCR-based pooled sample testing methodology tailored for early variant surveillance.

Methods

Using 1200 retrospective SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, either negative or positive for Delta or Omicron, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of our detection strategy employing commercial TaqMan variant probes in a 1:9 ratio of variant-positive to variant-negative samples.

Results

The study achieved 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity in 10-sample pools, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) exceeding 0.998 in ROC curves, using distinct commercial TaqMan variant probes.

Discussion

The employment of two separate TaqMan probes for both Delta and Omicron establishes dual validation routes, emphasizing the method's robustness. Although we used known samples to model realistic emergence scenarios of the Delta and Omicron variants, our main objective is to demonstrate the versatility of this strategy to identify future variant appearances. The utilization of two divergent variants and distinct probes for each confirms the method's independence from specific variants and probes. This flexibility ensures it can be tailored to recognize any subsequent variant emergence, given the availability of its sequence and a specific probe. Consequently, our approach stands as a robust tool for tracking and managing any new variant outbreak, reinforcing our global readiness against possible future SARS-CoV-2 waves.

Establishment of a Fast Diagnostic Method for Sepsis Pathogens Based on M1 Bead Enrichment

Blood culture-based sepsis diagnostic methods usually cannot obtain positive results in a timely manner. Molecular diagnostic methods, such as real-time PCR without blood culture, would be more time-saving and suitable for pathogenic diagnosis of sepsis, while their sensitivities have always been unsatisfactory for the usually low concentration of pathogens in the blood of sepsis patients. In this study, we established a fast diagnostic method using magnetic beads coated with human recombined mannose-binding lectin that makes it possible to concentrate pathogens from human plasma that have low concentrations of pathogens. With subsequent microculture (MC) and real-time PCR, this method allowed the detection of 1-10 CFUs/ml of Staphylococcus aureus, Group A Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida tropicalis, or C. albicans from human plasma within 9.5 h, which was 21-80 h earlier than blood culture. The combination of pathogen enrichment and MC made the detection of sepsis-causing pathogens more time-saving and more sensitive than blood culture or real-time PCR alone.

Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Suspected Bloodstream Infections

Accurate and timely etiological diagnosis is crucial for bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to their high disability and mortality. We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study to compare the digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay with traditional blood culture. A total of 169 blood samples from 122 patients with suspected BSIs were collected, mostly from the department of infectious diseases, the emergency department, and the intensive care units, and the clinical data were also recorded. Nucleic acid was extracted from the blood samples, and a 5-fluorescent-channel droplet digital PCR assay was performed and then fed back with the pathogen and its copies. In BSI patients, ddPCR reported an overall 85.71% (12/14) (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.15 to 97.48%) sensitivity, 100% (7/7) (95% CI, 56.09 to 100.00%) and 71.43% (5/7) (95% CI, 30.26 to 94.89%) sensitivity in patients without empirical treatment and in empirically treated patients, respectively. Compared to traditional blood culture, the overall detection rate of ddPCR was significantly higher, 11.27% (16/142) (95% CI, 6.78 to 17.93%) versus 30.28% (43/142) (95% CI, 23.01 to 38.64%), and the extra detection rate of ddPCR was 19.01% (27/142) (95% CI, 13.11 to 26.63%). Of the ddPCR-positive culture-negative cases, 74.19% (23/31) (95% CI, 55.07 to 87.46%) were consistent with the final clinical diagnosis, including 10 bacteria and fungi. The detection rate of ddPCR was significantly higher in patients with white blood cell (WBC) counts of >10 · 109/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) of >70 mg/L, or procalcitonin (PCT) of >0.9 ng/L. Pathogen loads detected by ddPCR are correlated with WBC, CRP, and especially, PCT levels, precisely and rapidly reflecting clinical disease progression. ddPCR has an important guiding value for the clinical use of antibiotics to achieve the best pathogen coverage and the antibacterial effect. Collectively, ddPCR showed a great diagnostic performance in BSIs and had an overall higher detection rate than blood culture. In addition, ddPCR could be used to dynamically monitor the disease progression and provide medication guidance on antibiotic use. IMPORTANCE ddPCR is a promising method to address the current challenges of BSI diagnosis and precise treatment, as it is highly efficient in DNA detection. It shortens the identification of BSI-related pathogens from several days of traditional bacterial culture to 4 to 5 h. It is extremely sensitive and more tolerant to PCR inhibitors, which may facilitate the amplification and enable the detection of a meager amount of DNA fragments in detecting BSI-related pathogens and drug-resistant genes. It can identify almost 20 pathogens in one reaction, which reduces the usage of clinical blood samples to no more than 2 mL. Additionally, dynamic monitoring, assessment of pathogens, and antibiotic resistance genes in patients could be used to guide timely and precise adjustment of antimicrobial prescription. The short turnaround time of ddPCR may have the potential to guide antimicrobial treatment in the very early stage of sepsis and reduce the mortality and disability rate of sepsis.

Value of digital PCR in the early diagnosis of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We systematically assessed whether a digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could detect pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis early and accurately.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CNKI, CBM, and Wanfang Data databases for eligible studies to compare the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in blood samples by digital PCR with the gold standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate bias risk, and a random-effects meta-analysis approach was used for sensitivity and specificity calculations.

RESULTS

Among the eight articles, there were eight identified studies with a total of 1278 subjects. The pooled sensitivity of digital PCR was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-98%), the specificity was 87% (95% CI, 76%-94%), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.3 (95% CI, 3.8-14.2), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.17), the positive predictive value was 84.7%, the negative predictive value was 89.2%, the diagnostic odds ratio was 105 (95% CI, 37-303), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00). Digital PCR can shorten the detection time of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital PCR can detect pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis earlier than blood culture. Therefore, digital PCR can be used as a potential strategy for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with sepsis.

Clinical evaluation of bacterial DNA using an improved droplet digital PCR for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis diagnosis

Objective

Bacterial DNA (bactDNA) detection can be used to quickly identify pathogenic bacteria and has been studied on ascitic fluid. We aimed to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic value and applicational prospect of the bactDNA load in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).

Method

We extracted viable bactDNA from ascitic samples of 250 patients with decompensated cirrhosis collected from October 2019 to April 2021 and detected the bactDNA by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). We used ascitic samples of a baseline cohort of 191 patients to establish diagnostic thresholds for SBP and analyze the patients’ diagnostic performance based on ascites polymorphonuclear (PMN) and clinical manifestation. We performed bactDNA quantification analysis on 13 patients with a PMN less than 250 cells/mm³ but with clinical symptoms. The dynamic changes of the bactDNA load from eight patients (before, during, and after SBP) were analyzed.

Results

After the removal of free DNA, the bactDNA detected by ddPCR was generally decreased (1.75 vs. 1.5 log copies/µl, P < 0.001). Compared with the traditional culture and PMN count in the SBP diagnosis, the bactDNA showed that the ddPCR sensitivity was 80.5%, specificity was 95.3%, positive predictive value was 82.5%, and negative predictive value was 94.7%, based on clinical composite criteria. In patients with a PMN less than 250 cells/mm³, the bactDNA load of 13 patients with symptoms was significantly higher than those without symptoms (2.7 vs. 1.7 log copies/µl, P < 0.001). The bactDNA in eight patients had SBP that decreased by 1.6 log copies/µl after 48 h of antibiotic treatment and by 1.0 log copies/µl after 3 days of continued treatment.

Conclusion

BactDNA detection can be used to further enhance the diagnostic efficiency of SBP. Therefore, the application of ddPCR assay not only can be used to discriminate and quantify bacteria but also can be used in the clinical assessment for antibiotics treatment.

Clinical validation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections in ICU practice: a promising diagnostic tool

Background

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged as a promising tool of pathogen detection in bloodstream infections (BSIs) in critical care medicine. However, different ddPCR platforms have variable sensitivity and specificity for diverse microorganisms at various infection sites. There is still a lack of prospective clinical studies aimed at validating and interpreting the discrepant ddPCR results for diagnosing BSI in intensive care unit (ICU) practice.

Methods

A prospective diagnostic study of multiplex ddPCR panels was conducted in a general ICU from May 21, 2021, to December 22, 2021. Paired blood cultures (BCs) and ddPCRs (2.5 h) were obtained synchronously to detect the 12 most common BSI pathogens and three antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Firstly, ddPCR performance was compared to definite BSI. Secondly, clinical validation of ddPCR was compared to composite clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Thirdly, the positive rate of AMR genes and related analysis was presented.

Results

A total of 438 episodes of suspected BSIs occurring in 150 critical patients were enrolled. BC and ddPCR were positive for targeted bacteria in 40 (9.1%) and 180 (41.1%) cases, respectively. There were 280 concordant and 158 discordant. In comparison with BCs, the sensitivity of ddPCR ranged from 58.8 to 86.7% with an aggregate of 72.5% in different species, with corresponding specificity ranging from 73.5 to 92.2% with an aggregate of 63.1%. Furthermore, the rate of ddPCR+/BC− results was 33.6% (147/438) with 87.1% (128 of 147) cases was associated with probable (n = 108) or possible (n = 20) BSIs. When clinically diagnosed BSI was used as true positive, the final sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR increased to 84.9% and 92.5%, respectively. In addition, 40 blaKPC, 3blaNDM, and 38 mecA genes were detected, among which 90.5% were definitely positive for blaKPC. Further, 65.8% specimens were predicted to be mecA-positive in Staphylococcus sp. according to all microbiological analysis.

Conclusions

The multiplexed ddPCR is a flexible and universal platform, which can be used as an add-on complementary to conventional BC. When combined with clinical infection evidence, ddPCR shows potential advantages for rapidly diagnosing suspected BSIs and AMR genes in ICU practice.

Evaluation of droplet digital PCR rapid detection method and precise diagnosis and treatment for suspected sepsis (PROGRESS): a study protocol for a multi-center pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Background

Sepsis is still a major public health concern and a medical emergency due to its high morbidity and mortality. Accurate and timely etiology diagnosis is crucial for sepsis management. As an emerging rapid and sensitive pathogen detection tool, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) has shown promising potential in rapid identification of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes. However, the diagnostic value and clinical impact of ddPCR tests remains to be studied in patients with suspected sepsis. PROGRESS trial is aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a novel ddPCR assay compared with standard practice.

Methods

PROGRESS is a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) set in ten hospitals, including departments of infectious disease and intensive care units. In this study, a total of 2292 patients with suspected sepsis will be randomly assigned to two arms: the ddPCR group and the control group with a ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome is the diagnostic efficacy, that is, the sensitivity and specificity of the ddPCR assay compared with the synchronous blood culture. Secondary outcomes include the mortality rates and the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at follow-up time points, the length of stay in the hospital, the time to directed antimicrobial therapy, duration of broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and the EQ-5D-5L score on day 90.

Discussion

It is the first multicenter pragmatic RCT to explore the diagnostic efficacy and clinical impact of the ddPCR assay in patients with suspected sepsis, taking advantage of both RCT’s ability to establish causality and the feasibility of pragmatic approaches in real-world studies (RWS). This trial will help us to get a comprehensive view of the assay’s capacity for precise diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. It has the potential to monitor the pathogen load change and to guide the antimicrobial therapy, making a beneficial impact on the prognosis of sepsis patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT05190861. Registered January 13, 2022—‘Retrospectively registered’, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05190861.

An Assay Combining Droplet Digital PCR With Propidium Monoazide Treatment for the Accurate Detection of Live Cells of Vibrio vulnificus in Plasma Samples

Vibrio vulnificus (V. vulnificus) is one of the most common pathogenic Vibrio species to humans; therefore, the establishment of timely and credible detection methods has become an urgent requirement for V. vulnificus illness surveillance. In this study, an assay combining droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment was developed for detecting V. vulnificus. The primers/probes targeting the V. vulnificus hemolysin A (vvhA) gene, amplification procedures, and PMA processing conditions involved in the assay were optimized. Then, we analyzed the specificity, sensitivity, and ability to detect live cell DNA while testing the performance of PMA-ddPCR in clinical samples. The optimal concentrations of primers and probes were 1.0 and 0.3 μM, respectively. The annealing temperature achieving the highest accuracy in ddPCR assay was 60°C. With an initial V. vulnificus cell concentration of 10⁸ CFU/mL (colony-forming units per milliliter), the optimal strategy to distinguish live cells from dead cells was to treat samples with 100 μM PMA for 15 min in the dark and expose them to LED light with an output wavelength of 465 nm for 10 min. The specificity of the PMA-ddPCR assay was tested on 27 strains, including seven V. vulnificus strains and 20 other bacterial strains. Only the seven V. vulnificus strains were observed with positive signals in specificity analysis. Comparative experiments on the detection ability of PMA-ddPCR and PMA-qPCR in pure cultures and plasma samples were performed. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) in pure culture solutions of V. vulnificus were 29.33 and 53.64 CFU/mL in PMA-ddPCR, respectively. For artificially clinical sample tests in PMA-ddPCR, V. vulnificus could be detected at concentrations as low as 65.20 CFU/mL. The sensitivity of the PMA-ddPCR assay was 15- to 40-fold more sensitive than the PMA-qPCR in this study. The PMA-ddPCR assay we developed provides a new insight to accurately detect live cells of V. vulnificus in clinical samples, which is of great significance to enhance public health safety and security capability and improve the emergency response level for V. vulnificus infection.

Droplet-based methods for tackling antimicrobial resistance

Application of droplet-based methods enables (i) faster detection, (ii) increased sensitivity, (iii) characterization of the level of heterogeneity in response to antibiotics by bacterial populations, and (iv) expanded screening of the effectiveness of antibiotic combinations. Hereby, we discuss the key steps and parameters of droplet-based experiments to investigate antimicrobial resistance. We also review recent findings accomplished with these methods and highlight their advantages and capacity to yield new insights into the problem of antimicrobial resistance.

Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: An Evolution of Technologies towards Accurate and Rapid Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a leading cause of death worldwide. The lack of timely and reliable diagnostic practices is an ongoing issue for managing BSI. The current gold standard blood culture practice for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing is time-consuming. Delayed diagnosis warrants the use of empirical antibiotics, which could lead to poor patient outcomes, and risks the development of antibiotic resistance. Hence, novel techniques that could offer accurate and timely diagnosis and susceptibility testing are urgently needed. This review focuses on BSI and highlights both the progress and shortcomings of its current diagnosis. We surveyed clinical workflows that employ recently approved technologies and showed that, while offering improved sensitivity and selectivity, these techniques are still unable to deliver a timely result. We then discuss a number of emerging technologies that have the potential to shorten the overall turnaround time of BSI diagnosis through direct testing from whole blood—while maintaining, if not improving—the current assay’s sensitivity and pathogen coverage. We concluded by providing our assessment of potential future directions for accelerating BSI pathogen identification and the antibiotic susceptibility test. While engineering solutions have enabled faster assay turnaround, further progress is still needed to supplant blood culture practice and guide appropriate antibiotic administration for BSI patients.

REASSURED Multiplex Diagnostics: A Critical Review and Forecast

The diagnosis of infectious diseases is ineffective when the diagnostic test does not meet one or more of the necessary standards of affordability, accessibility, and accuracy. The World Health Organization further clarifies these standards with a set of criteria that has the acronym ASSURED (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and robust, Equipment-free and Deliverable to end-users). The advancement of the digital age has led to a revision of the ASSURED criteria to REASSURED: Real-time connectivity, Ease of specimen collection, Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and robust, Equipment-free or simple, and Deliverable to end-users. Many diagnostic tests have been developed that aim to satisfy the REASSURED criteria; however, most of them only detect a single target. With the progression of syndromic infections, coinfections and the current antimicrobial resistance challenges, the need for multiplexed diagnostics is now more important than ever. This review summarizes current diagnostic technologies for multiplexed detection and forecasts which methods have promise for detecting multiple targets and meeting all REASSURED criteria.

Development of a Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Sensitive Detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Respiratory Tract Specimens

Background:Pneumocystis jirovecii is a human-specific opportunistic fungus that causes Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), a life-threatening opportunistic lung infection that affects immunocompromised patients. P. jirovecii colonization may be linked to the transmission of the infection. The detection of P. jirovecii in immunocompromised patients is thus especially important. The low fungal load and the presence of PCR inhibitors limit the usefulness of quantitative PCR (qPCR) for accurate absolute quantification of P. jirovecii in specimens. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), however, presents a methodology that allows higher sensitivity and accuracy. Here, we developed a ddPCR method for detecting P. jirovecii DNA in respiratory specimens, and evaluated its sensitivity against qPCR.

Materials and Methods: One bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) sample each was collected from 82 patients with potential PCP to test the presence of P. jirovecii DNA using both ddPCR and qPCR, and samples with inconsistent results between the two methods were further tested by metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS). In addition, 37 sputum samples from 16 patients diagnosed with PCP, as well as continuous respiratory tract specimens from nine patients with PCP and treated with sulfonamides, were also collected for P. jirovecii DNA testing using both ddPCR and qPCR.

Results: ddPCR and qPCR gave the same results for 95.12% (78/82) of the BALF samples. The remaining four specimens tested positive using ddPCR but negative using qPCR, and they were found to be positive by mNGS. Detection results of 78.37% (29/37) sputum samples were consistent between ddPCR and qPCR, while the other eight samples tested positive using ddPCR but negative using qPCR. The P. jirovecii load of patients with PCP decreased to undetectable levels after treatment according to qPCR, but P. jirovecii was still detectable using ddPCR.

Conclusions: ddPCR was more sensitive than qPCR, especially at detecting low-pathogen-load P. jirovecii. Thus, ddPCR represents a useful, viable, and reliable alternative to qPCR in P. jirovecii testing in patients with immunodeficiency.

ddPCR allows 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of very small DNA amounts from low-biomass samples

BACKGROUND

One limiting factor of short amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing approaches is the use of low DNA amounts in the amplicon generation step. Especially for low-biomass samples, insufficient or even commonly undetectable DNA amounts can limit or prohibit further analysis in standard protocols.

RESULTS

Using a newly established protocol, very low DNA input amounts were found sufficient for reliable detection of bacteria using 16S rRNA gene sequencing compared to standard protocols. The improved protocol includes an optimized amplification strategy by using a digital droplet PCR. We demonstrate how PCR products are generated even when using very low concentrated DNA, unable to be detected by using a Qubit. Importantly, the use of different 16S rRNA gene primers had a greater effect on the resulting taxonomical profiles compared to using high or very low initial DNA amounts.

CONCLUSION

Our improved protocol takes advantage of ddPCR and allows faithful amplification of very low amounts of template. With this, samples of low bacterial biomass become comparable to those with high amounts of bacteria, since the first and most biasing steps are the same. Besides, it is imperative to state DNA concentrations and volumes used and to include negative controls indicating possible shifts in taxonomical profiles. Despite this, results produced by using different primer pairs cannot be easily compared.

Multiplex Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Rapid Molecular Detection of Pathogens in Patients With Sepsis: Protocol for an Assay Development Study

BACKGROUND

Blood cultures are the cornerstone of diagnosis for detecting the presence of bacteria or fungi in the blood, with an average detection time of 48 hours and failure to detect a pathogen occurring in approximately 50% of patients with sepsis. Rapid diagnosis would facilitate earlier treatment and/or an earlier switch to narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to develop and implement a multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay as a routine diagnostic tool in the detection and identification of pathogens from whole blood and/or blood culture after 3 hours of incubation.

METHODS

The study consists of three phases: (1) design of primer-probe pairs for accurate and reliable quantification of the most common sepsis-causing microorganisms using a multiplex reaction, (2) determination of the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex ddPCR assay, and (3) a clinical study in patients with sepsis using the assay. The QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System will be used for the detection of the following species-specific genes in blood from patients with sepsis: coa (staphylocoagulase) in Staphylococcus aureus, cpsA (capsular polysaccharide) in Streptococcus pneumoniae, uidA (beta-D-glucuronidase) in Escherichia coli, oprL (peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the highly conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. All data will be analyzed using QuantaSoft Analysis Pro Software.

RESULTS

In phase 1, to determine the optimal annealing temperature for the designed primer-probe pairs, results from a gradient temperature experiment will be collected and the limit of detection (LOD) of the assay will be determined. In phase 2, results for the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the assay will be obtained after an optimization of the extraction and purification method in spiked blood. In phase 3, clinical sensitivity and specificity as compared to the standard blood culture technique will be determined using 301 clinical samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful design of primer-probe pairs in the first phase and subsequent optimization and determination of the LOD will allow progression to phase 3 to compare the novel method with existing blood culture methods.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/33746.

Development and clinical validation of a droplet digital PCR assay for detecting Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae in patients with suspected bloodstream infections

The relatively long turnaround time and low sensitivity of traditional blood culture-based diagnosis may delay effective antibiotic therapy for patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). A rapid and sensitive pathogen detection method is urgently required to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with BSIs. Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae are two major microorganisms that cause BSIs. Here we report a novel droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay that can detect A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae in blood samples within 4 h, with a specificity of 100% for each strain and a limit of detection at 0.93 copies/μl for A. baumannii and 0.27 copies/μl for K. pneumoniae. Clinical validation of 170 patients with suspected BSIs showed that compared to blood cultures that detected four (2.4%) A. baumannii cases and seven (4.1%) K. pneumoniae cases, ddPCR detected 23 (13.5%) A. baumannii cases, 26 (15.3%) K. pneumoniae cases, and four (2.4%) co-infection cases, including the 11 cases detected via blood culture. In addition, patients who tested positive via ddPCR alone (n = 42) had significantly lower serum concentrations of procalcitonin and lactate, SOFA and APACHE II scores, and 28-day mortality than those reported positive via both blood culture and ddPCR (n = 11), suggesting that patients with less severe symptoms can potentially benefit from ddPCR-based diagnosis. In conclusion, our study suggests that ddPCR represents a sensitive and rapid method for identifying causal pathogens in blood samples and guiding treatment decisions in the early stages of BSIs.

Accurate quantification of bacterial abundance in metagenomic DNAs accounting for variable DNA integrity levels

The quantification of the total microbial content in metagenomic samples is critical for investigating the interplay between the microbiome and its host, as well as for assessing the accuracy and precision of the relative microbial composition which can be strongly biased in low microbial biomass samples. In the present study, we demonstrate that digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can provide accurate quantification of the total copy number of the 16S rRNA gene, the gene usually exploited for assessing total bacterial abundance in metagenomic DNA samples. Notably, using DNA templates with different integrity levels, as measured by the DNA integrity number (DIN), we demonstrated that 16S rRNA copy number quantification is strongly affected by DNA quality and determined a precise correlation between quantification underestimation and DNA degradation levels. Therefore, we propose an input DNA mass correction, according to the observed DIN value, which could prevent inaccurate quantification of 16S copy number in degraded metagenomic DNAs. Our results highlight that a preliminary evaluation of the metagenomic DNA integrity should be considered before performing metagenomic analyses of different samples, both for the assessment of the reliability of observed differential abundances in different conditions and to obtain significant functional insights.

Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) using three different methods

European brown hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas 1778) is a broadly distributed lagomorph species in Europe, recognized as a host for Ixodes ricinus and reservoir of a wide range of pathogens with zoonotic potential. Even though Lepus europaeus represents an important game animal in Central Europe, the data available on Anaplasma phagocytophilum in this lagomorph are scarce. In this study, three populations of brown hare from distinct localities in the Czech Republic were analysed for the presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA. We used standard qPCR, targeting the msp2 gene and adapted the same assay also for digital droplet PCR. Out of 91 samples, these two methods identified 9 and 12 as positive, respectively. For taxonomic analysis, we amplified the groEL gene from five of six samples that were found positive by both methods. In phylogenetic analyses, this haplotype belongs to ecotype 1, and to the subclade with isolates from cervids and I. ricinus. Our findings underline the importance of correct result interpretation and positivity cut-off set-up for different detection methods of A. phagocytophilum. This bacterium is characterized by a high intraspecific variability and highly sensitive detection itself, is not enough. Detailed molecular typing is necessary to define the zoonotic potential of different strains and their natural reservoirs.

Digital PCR for accurate quantification of pathogens: Principles, applications, challenges and future prospects

Pathogens pose a severe threat to food safety and human health. The traditional methods for pathogen detection can't meet the growing diagnosis and control need. Digital PCR (dPCR) attracts a considerable attention for its ability to absolutely quantify pathogens with features of high selectivity, simplicity, accuracy and rapidity. The dPCR technique that achieves absolute quantification based on end-point measurement without standard curve offers a guideline for further genetic analysis and molecular diagnosis. It could contribute to the quantification of low level of nucleic acid, early detection and timely prevention of pathogenic diseases. In this review, 1442 publications about dPCR were selected and the detections of various pathogens by dPCR were reviewed comprehensively, including viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi. A number of examples are cited to illustrate that dPCR is a new powerful tool with desired accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility for quantification of different types of pathogens. Moreover, the benefits, challenges and future prospects of the dPCR were also highlighted in this review.

A Comparison of Blood Pathogen Detection Among Droplet Digital PCR, Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing, and Blood Culture in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Bloodstream Infections

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) have recently demonstrated a great potential for pathogen detection. However, few studies have been undertaken to compare these two nucleic acid detection methods for identifying pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). This prospective study was thus conducted to compare these two methods for diagnostic applications in a clinical setting for critically ill patients with suspected BSIs. Upon suspicion of BSIs, whole blood samples were simultaneously drawn for ddPCR covering 20 common isolated pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, mNGS, and blood culture. Then, a head-to-head comparison was performed between ddPCR and mNGS. A total of 60 episodes of suspected BSIs were investigated in 45 critically ill patients, and ddPCR was positive in 50 (83.3%), mNGS in 41 (68.3%, not including viruses), and blood culture in 10 (16.7%) episodes. Of the 10 positive blood cultures, nine were concordantly identified by both mNGS and ddPCR methods. The head-to-head comparison showed that ddPCR was more rapid (~4 h vs. ~2 days) and sensitive (88 vs. 53 detectable pathogens) than mNGS within the detection range of ddPCR, while mNGS detected a broader range of pathogens (126 vs. 88 detectable pathogens, including viruses) than ddPCR. In addition, a total of 17 AMR genes, including 14 bla_KPC and 3 mecA genes, were exclusively identified by ddPCR. Based on their respective limitations and strengths, the ddPCR method is more useful for rapid detection of common isolated pathogens as well as AMR genes in critically ill patients with suspected BSI, whereas mNGS testing is more appropriate for the diagnosis of BSI where classic microbiological or molecular diagnostic approaches fail to identify causative pathogens.

Droplet digital PCR as an emerging tool in detecting pathogens nucleic acids in infectious diseases

The microbial infectious diseases (infectious diseases) represent the leading global public health problem, and the effective treatment depends on rapid and accurate detection of pathogens. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a new assay that combines microfluidics technology with TaqMan-based PCR, provides absolute quantification without the need of the standard curves. With the development of ddPCR, it has become an ideal tool for microorganism detection. In this review, we summarized the major literature with regard to the application of ddPCR in detecting the pathogenic microorganisms of infectious diseases, including bacteria, fungi, and virus. The ddPCR method has the advantages of detecting the targeted DNA of infectious microorganisms, with high sensitivity, high precision, and absolute quantification. Thus, ddPCR has emerged as a promising and reliable tool in detecting pathogenicmicroorganisms.

Rapid and sensitive identification of pleural and peritoneal infections by droplet digital PCR

Pleural and peritoneal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on the cultivation of clinical samples, which usually takes days to obtain report and holds a low detection sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated a 5-fluorescent-channel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system and 5 assay panels for culture-independent rapid pathogen detections directly from pleural and peritoneal fluid samples. Traditional culture of the same sample was used as reference. A total of 40 pleural fluid samples and 19 peritoneal fluid samples were tested in this study. Twenty-five positives including 4 polymicrobial infections by culture and 26 positives including 11 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for pleural fluid samples; 14 positives including 2 polymicrobial infections by culture and 15 positives including 3 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for peritoneal fluid samples. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacterium detected both in pleural and in peritoneal fluid samples. The sensitivity of the ddPCR assay for pleural and peritoneal fluid samples was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 79.65 to 99.90%) and 92.86% (95% CI = 66.13 to 99.82%), respectively. The turnaround time of the ddPCR assay was approximately 3 h comparing with 38.30 ± 22.44 h for culture-based identifications. Our results demonstrated that the ddPCR assay is a rapid and sensitive method for identifying pathogens responsible for pleural and peritoneal infections and would be a promising approach for early diagnosis and optimizing treatment of infections.