1
|
Barrett S, Zahid MU, Enderling H, Marignol L. Predicting Individual Tumor Response Dynamics in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Mathematical Modelling Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 121:1077-1087. [PMID: 39641707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To predict individual tumor responses to radiation therapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The proliferation saturation index (PSI) model, which models tumor dynamics in response to RT as an instantaneous reduction in tumor volume, was fit to n = 162 patients with 4 distinct dose fractionation schedules (30-32 fractions × 2 Gy, 23-24 fractions × 2.75 Gy, 32-42 fractions × 1.8 Gy, and 30 fractions × 1.5 Gy Bidaily, followed by 5-12 fractions × 2 Gy daily). Following initial training, the predictive power of the model was tested using only the first 3 tumor volume measurements as measured on daily imaging. The remainder of tumor volume regression during RT was simulated using the PSI model. Comparisons of the measured to the simulated volumes were made using scatter plots, coefficient of determination (R2), and Pearson correlation coefficient values. RESULTS The PSI model predicted tumor volume regression during RT with a high degree of accuracy. Comparison of the measured versus predicted volumes resulted in R2 values of 0.968, 0.954, 0.968, and 0.937, and Pearson correlation coefficient values of 0.984, 0.977, 0.984, and 0.968 in the 2 Gy, 1.8 Gy, 2.75 Gy, and Bidaily groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The proliferation saturation model can predict, with a high degree of accuracy, non-small cell lung cancer tumor volume regression in response to RT in 4 distinct dose fractionation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Barrett
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Mohammad U Zahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heiko Enderling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Institute for Data Science in Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Marignol
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoegen P, Lang C, Akbaba S, Häring P, Splinter M, Miltner A, Bachmann M, Stahl-Arnsberger C, Brechter T, El Shafie RA, Weykamp F, König L, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Cone-Beam-CT Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Enables Quality Assurance and Superior Sparing of Healthy Lung. Front Oncol 2020; 10:564857. [PMID: 33363005 PMCID: PMC7756078 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the potential of cone-beam-CT (CB-CT) guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for sparing of surrounding organs-at-risk (OAR). Materials and Methods In 10 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, daily CB-CT imaging was acquired during radio- (n = 4) or radiochemotherapy (n = 6) for simulation of ART. Patients were treated with conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with total doses of 60–66 Gy (pPlan) (311 fraction CB-CTs). OAR were segmented on every daily CB-CT and the tumor volumes were modified weekly depending on tumor changes. Doses actually delivered were recalculated on daily images (dPlan), and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For simulation of ART, treatment plans were adapted using the new contours and re-optimized weekly (aPlan). Results CB-CT showed continuous tumor regression of 1.1 ± 0.4% per day, leading to a residual gross tumor volume (GTV) of 65.3 ± 13.4% after 6 weeks of radiotherapy (p = 0.005). Corresponding PTVs decreased to 83.7 ± 7.8% (p = 0.005). In the actually delivered plans (dPlan), both conformity (p = 0.005) and homogeneity (p = 0.059) indices were impaired compared to the initial plans (pPlan). This resulted in higher actual lung doses than planned: V20Gy was 34.6 ± 6.8% instead of 32.8 ± 4.9% (p = 0.066), mean lung dose was 19.0 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.9 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013). The generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) of the lung was 18.9 ± 3.1 Gy instead of 17.8 ± 2.5 Gy (p = 0.013), leading to an increased lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 15.2 ± 13.9% instead of 9.6 ± 7.3% (p = 0.017). Weekly plan adaptation enabled decreased lung V20Gy of 31.6 ± 6.2% (−3.0%, p = 0.007), decreased mean lung dose of 17.7 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005), and decreased lung gEUD of 17.6 ± 2.9 Gy (−1.3 Gy, p = 0.005). Thus, resulting lung NTCP was reduced to 10.0 ± 9.5% (−5.2%, p = 0.005). Target volume coverage represented by conformity and homogeneity indices could be improved by weekly plan adaptation (CI: p = 0.007, HI: p = 0.114) and reached levels of the initial plan (CI: p = 0.721, HI: p = 0.333). Conclusion IGRT with CB-CT detects continuous GTV and PTV changes. CB-CT-guided ART for locally advanced NSCLC is feasible and enables superior sparing of healthy lung at high levels of plan conformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Lang
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona Splinter
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annette Miltner
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion Bachmann
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Brechter
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu T, Yu S, Li Y, Ren H, Ning Q, Wang J, Liang X, Li M. PDK2 induces cisplatin-resistance in lung adenocarcinoma via transcriptional regulation of CNNM3. J Drug Target 2018; 27:460-465. [PMID: 30457021 DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2018.1550648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma has become one of the most frequent causes of major cancer incidence and mortality worldwide according to its frequently gained resistance to chemotherapies. In this study, we identified a poorly-studied kinase pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isoform 2 (PDK2) as the most up-regulated kinase encoding gene in Cisplatin resistant lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, PDK2-dependent Cisplatin-resistance promotes tumour growth of lung adenocarcinoma both in vitro and in vivo. Clinically, PDK2 expression was up-regulated in lung adenocarcinoma and was correlated to the poor prognosis of lung cancer patients. Mechanically, PDK2 promoted cell growth and Cisplatin-resistance of lung adenocarcinoma via transcriptional regulation of cyclin and CBS domain divalent metal cation transport mediator 3 (CNNM3), indicating that PDK2-CNNM3 signalling axis could be a potential therapeutic target for Cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tinghua Hu
- a Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Shuo Yu
- b Department of General Surgery , The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Yang Li
- a Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Hui Ren
- a Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Qian Ning
- a Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| | - Jing Wang
- c Department of Oncology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shannxi , China
| | - Xuan Liang
- c Department of Oncology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shannxi , China
| | - Manxiang Li
- a Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine , The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an , Shaanxi , China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
MacManus M, Everitt S, Schimek-Jasch T, Li XA, Nestle U, Kong FMS. Anatomic, functional and molecular imaging in lung cancer precision radiation therapy: treatment response assessment and radiation therapy personalization. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6:670-688. [PMID: 29218270 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.09.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews key imaging modalities for lung cancer patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) and considers their actual or potential contributions to critical decision-making. An international group of researchers with expertise in imaging in lung cancer patients treated with RT considered the relevant literature on modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). These perspectives were coordinated to summarize the current status of imaging in lung cancer and flag developments with future implications. Although there are no useful randomized trials of different imaging modalities in lung cancer, multiple prospective studies indicate that management decisions are frequently impacted by the use of complementary imaging modalities, leading both to more appropriate treatments and better outcomes. This is especially true of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT which is widely accepted to be the standard imaging modality for staging of lung cancer patients, for selection for potentially curative RT and for treatment planning. PET is also more accurate than CT for predicting survival after RT. PET imaging during RT is also correlated with survival and makes response-adapted therapies possible. PET tracers other than FDG have potential for imaging important biological process in tumors, including hypoxia and proliferation. MRI has superior accuracy in soft tissue imaging and the MRI Linac is a rapidly developing technology with great potential for online monitoring and modification of treatment. The role of imaging in RT-treated lung cancer patients is evolving rapidly and will allow increasing personalization of therapy according to the biology of both the tumor and dose limiting normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sarah Everitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tanja Schimek-Jasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI, USA
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Feng-Ming Spring Kong
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berkovic P, Paelinck L, Gulyban A, van Eijkeren M, Surmont V, Lievens Y, Vandecasteele K. Adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: dosimetric gain and treatment outcome prediction. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1656-1659. [PMID: 28835160 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1352103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Berkovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Akos Gulyban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marc van Eijkeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Surmont
- Department of Respiratory Medicine/Thoracic Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|