1
|
Mohd Salleh MH, Esa Y, Mohamed R. Global Terrapin Character-Based DNA Barcodes: Assessment of the Mitochondrial COI Gene and Conservation Status Revealed a Putative Cryptic Species. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:1720. [PMID: 37889683 PMCID: PMC10251852 DOI: 10.3390/ani13111720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological and analytical advances to study evolutionary biology, ecology, and conservation of the Southern River Terrapin (Batagur affinis ssp.) are realised through molecular approaches, including DNA barcoding. We evaluated the use of COI DNA barcodes in Malaysia's Southern River Terrapin population to better understand the species' genetic divergence and other genetic characteristics. We evaluated 26 sequences, including four from field specimens of Southern River Terrapins obtained in Bota Kanan, Perak, Malaysia, and Kuala Berang, Terengganu, Malaysia, as well as 22 sequences from global terrapins previously included in the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) Systems and GenBank. The species are divided into three families: eight Geoemydidae species (18%), three Emydidae species (6%), and one Pelomedusidae species (2%). The IUCN Red List assigned the 12 species of terrapins sampled for this study to the classifications of critically endangered (CR) for 25% of the samples and endangered (EN) for 8% of the samples. With new haplotypes from the world's terrapins, 16 haplotypes were found. The intraspecific distance values between the COI gene sequences were calculated using the K2P model, which indicated a potential cryptic species between the Northern River Terrapin (Batagur baska) and Southern River Terrapin (Batagur affinis affinis). The Bayesian analysis of the phylogenetic tree also showed both species in the same lineage. The BLASTn search resulted in 100% of the same species of B. affinis as B. baska. The Jalview alignment visualised almost identical sequences between both species. The Southern River Terrapin (B. affinis affinis) from the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia was found to share the same haplotype (Hap_1) as the Northern River Terrapin from India. However, B. affinis edwardmolli from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia formed Hap_16. The COI analysis found new haplotypes and showed that DNA barcodes are an excellent way to measure the diversity of a population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Hairul Mohd Salleh
- Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
- Royal Malaysian Customs Department, Persiaran Perdana, Presint 2, Putrajaya 62596, Malaysia
| | - Yuzine Esa
- Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
- International Institute of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Lot 960 Jalan Kemang 6, Port Dickson 71050, Malaysia
| | - Rozihan Mohamed
- Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos BF, Miller ME, Miklasevskaja M, McKeown JTA, Redmond NE, Coddington JA, Bird J, Miller SE, Smith A, Brady SG, Buffington ML, Chamorro ML, Dikow T, Gates MW, Goldstein P, Konstantinov A, Kula R, Silverson ND, Solis MA, deWaard SL, Naik S, Nikolova N, Pentinsaari M, Prosser SWJ, Sones JE, Zakharov EV, deWaard JR. Enhancing DNA barcode reference libraries by harvesting terrestrial arthropods at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. Biodivers Data J 2023; 11:e100904. [PMID: 38327288 PMCID: PMC10848724 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.11.e100904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of DNA barcoding has revolutionised biodiversity science, but its application depends on the existence of comprehensive and reliable reference libraries. For many poorly known taxa, such reference sequences are missing even at higher-level taxonomic scales. We harvested the collections of the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History (USNM) to generate DNA barcoding sequences for genera of terrestrial arthropods previously not recorded in one or more major public sequence databases. Our workflow used a mix of Sanger and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approaches to maximise sequence recovery while ensuring affordable cost. In total, COI sequences were obtained for 5,686 specimens belonging to 3,737 determined species in 3,886 genera and 205 families distributed in 137 countries. Success rates varied widely according to collection data and focal taxon. NGS helped recover sequences of specimens that failed a previous run of Sanger sequencing. Success rates and the optimal balance between Sanger and NGS are the most important drivers to maximise output and minimise cost in future projects. The corresponding sequence and taxonomic data can be accessed through the Barcode of Life Data System, GenBank, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, the Global Genome Biodiversity Network Data Portal and the NMNH data portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo F. Santos
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
- Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, SU, EPHE, UA, Paris, FranceInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, SU, EPHE, UAParisFrance
| | - Meredith E. Miller
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Margarita Miklasevskaja
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Jaclyn T. A. McKeown
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Niamh E. Redmond
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Jonathan A. Coddington
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Jessica Bird
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Scott E. Miller
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Ashton Smith
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Seán G. Brady
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Matthew L. Buffington
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - M. Lourdes Chamorro
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Torsten Dikow
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Michael W. Gates
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Paul Goldstein
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Alexander Konstantinov
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Robert Kula
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Nicholas D. Silverson
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - M. Alma Solis
- Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, United States of AmericaSystematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureWashingtonUnited States of America
| | - Stephanie L. deWaard
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Suresh Naik
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Nadya Nikolova
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Mikko Pentinsaari
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Sean W. J. Prosser
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Jayme E. Sones
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Evgeny V. Zakharov
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| | - Jeremy R. deWaard
- National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of AmericaNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian InstitutionWashingtonUnited States of America
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of GuelphGuelphCanada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu YH, Hou SB, Yuan ZY, Jiang K, Huang RY, Wang K, Liu Q, Yu ZB, Zhao HP, Zhang BL, Chen JM, Wang LJ, Stuart BL, Chambers EA, Wang YF, Gao W, Zou DH, Yan F, Zhao GG, Fu ZX, Wang SN, Jiang M, Zhang L, Ren JL, Wu YY, Zhang LY, Yang DC, Jin JQ, Yin TT, Li JT, Zhao WG, Murphy RW, Huang S, Guo P, Zhang YP, Che J. DNA barcoding of Chinese snakes reveals hidden diversity and conservation needs. Mol Ecol Resour 2023. [PMID: 36924341 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
DNA barcoding has greatly facilitated studies of taxonomy, biodiversity, biological conservation, and ecology. Here, we establish a reliable DNA barcoding library for Chinese snakes, unveiling hidden diversity with implications for taxonomy, and provide a standardized tool for conservation management. Our comprehensive study includes 1638 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences from Chinese snakes that correspond to 17 families, 65 genera, 228 named species (80.6% of named species) and 36 candidate species. A barcode gap analysis reveals gaps, where all nearest neighbour distances exceed maximum intraspecific distances, in 217 named species and all candidate species. Three species-delimitation methods (ABGD, sGMYC, and sPTP) recover 320 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), of which 192 OTUs correspond to named and candidate species. Twenty-eight other named species share OTUs, such as Azemiops feae and A. kharini, Gloydius halys, G. shedaoensis, and G. intermedius, and Bungarus multicinctus and B. candidus, representing inconsistencies most probably caused by imperfect taxonomy, recent and rapid speciation, weak taxonomic signal, introgressive hybridization, and/or inadequate phylogenetic signal. In contrast, 43 species and candidate species assign to two or more OTUs due to having large intraspecific distances. If most OTUs detected in this study reflect valid species, including the 36 candidate species, then 30% more species would exist than are currently recognized. Several OTU divergences associate with known biogeographic barriers, such as the Taiwan Strait. In addition to facilitating future studies, this reliable and relatively comprehensive reference database will play an important role in the future monitoring, conservation, and management of Chinese snakes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-He Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Shao-Bing Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650204, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Ke Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Ru-Yi Huang
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation for Aquatic Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China
| | - Kai Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Qin Liu
- Faculty of Agriculture, Forest and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan, 644007, China
| | - Zhong-Bin Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Hai-Peng Zhao
- School of Life Science, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, 475001, China
| | - Bao-Lin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Jin-Min Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Li-Jun Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, 571158, China
| | - Bryan L Stuart
- Section of Research & Collections, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601, USA
| | - E Anne Chambers
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA
| | - Yu-Fan Wang
- Zhejiang Forest Resource Monitoring Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020, China
| | - Wei Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Da-Hu Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
- College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet, 850000, China
| | - Fang Yan
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Gui-Gang Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Zhong-Xiong Fu
- Yunnan Senye Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 666100, China
| | - Shao-Neng Wang
- Bureau of Guangxi Mao'er Mountain Nature Reserve, Guilin, Guangxi, 541316, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Gongshan Bureau of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, Gongshan, Yunnan, 650224, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510260, China
| | - Jin-Long Ren
- Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Ya-Yong Wu
- Faculty of Agriculture, Forest and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan, 644007, China
| | - Lu-Yang Zhang
- Beijing Mountains & Seas Eco Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, 101100, China
| | - Dian-Cheng Yang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resource, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China
| | - Jie-Qiong Jin
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Ting-Ting Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Jia-Tang Li
- Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Wen-Ge Zhao
- College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, China
| | - Robert W Murphy
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
- Reptilia Zoo and Education Centre, Vaughn, Ontario, L4K 2N6, Canada
| | - Song Huang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of the Conservation and Exploitation of Biological Resource, College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China
| | - Peng Guo
- Faculty of Agriculture, Forest and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, Sichuan, 644007, China
| | - Ya-Ping Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| | - Jing Che
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation of Gaoligong Mountain, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo M, Yuan C, Tao L, Cai Y, Zhang W. Life barcoded by DNA barcodes. CONSERV GENET RESOUR 2022; 14:351-365. [PMID: 35991367 PMCID: PMC9377290 DOI: 10.1007/s12686-022-01291-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The modern concept of DNA-based barcoding for cataloguing biodiversity was proposed in 2003 by first adopting an approximately 600 bp fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene to compare via nucleotide alignments with known sequences from specimens previously identified by taxonomists. Other standardized regions meeting barcoding criteria then are also evolving as DNA barcodes for fast, reliable and inexpensive assessment of species composition across all forms of life, including animals, plants, fungi, bacteria and other microorganisms. Consequently, global DNA barcoding campaigns have resulted in the formation of many online workbenches and databases, such as BOLD system, as barcode references, and facilitated the development of mini-barcodes and metabarcoding strategies as important extensions of barcode techniques. Here we intend to give an overview of the characteristics and features of these barcode markers and major reference libraries existing for barcoding the planet’s life, as well as to address the limitations and opportunities of DNA barcodes to an increasingly broader community of science and society.
Collapse
|
5
|
Velo-Antón G, Henrique M, Liz AV, Martínez-Freiría F, Pleguezuelos JM, Geniez P, Crochet PA, Brito JC. DNA barcode reference library for the West Sahara-Sahel reptiles. Sci Data 2022; 9:459. [PMID: 35915106 PMCID: PMC9343634 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01582-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA barcode reference libraries are now continuously produced for the tree of life, which are essential pillars for the study of biological diversity. Yet, our knowledge about global diversity is largely limited in undersampled regions such as the largest warm desert, the Sahara-Sahel. This dataset provides a DNA barcode reference library for the reptiles of the Western Sahara-Sahel (WSS) and neighbouring countries across this region. It includes 760 barcodes from 133 reptile taxa, distributed in 23 families, and covering the intraspecific diversity of some species. A total of 84 species were collected in the WSS (83% of the total reptile species richness) over 18 overland field expeditions conducted since 2003. DNA barcodes resulted in a high success rate (95%) of species identification and barcoding gap analysis highlighted the effectiveness of the COI fragment as a barcode marker for the WSS reptiles. This dataset represents a comprehensive and reliable DNA reference library for the WSS, filling an important biodiversity gap across a remote and hard-to-sample region. Measurement(s) | reptile diversity | Technology Type(s) | DNA barcoding | Factor Type(s) | DNA barcode sequencing | Sample Characteristic - Organism | reptiles | Sample Characteristic - Environment | terrestrial | Sample Characteristic - Location | Western Sahara-Sahel |
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo Velo-Antón
- Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Grupo GEA, Vigo, E-36310, Spain. .,CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal. .,BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.
| | - Margarida Henrique
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| | - André Vicente Liz
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.,BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.,Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fernando Martínez-Freiría
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal.,BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal
| | | | - Philippe Geniez
- CEFE, EPHE-PSL, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés, Montpellier, France
| | | | - José Carlos Brito
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal. .,BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal. .,Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zangl L, Schäffer S, Daill D, Friedrich T, Gessl W, Mladinić M, Sturmbauer C, Wanzenböck J, Weiss SJ, Koblmüller S. A comprehensive DNA barcode inventory of Austria’s fish species. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268694. [PMID: 35679240 PMCID: PMC9182252 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Austria is inhabited by more than 80 species of native and non-native freshwater fishes. Despite considerable knowledge about Austrian fish species, the latest Red List of threatened species dates back 15 years and a systematic genetic inventory of Austria’s fish species does not exist. To fulfill this deficit, we employed DNA barcoding to generate an up-to-date and comprehensive genetic reference database for Austrian fish species. In total, 639 newly generated cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) sequences were added to the 377 existing records from the BOLD data base, to compile a near complete reference dataset. Standard sequence similarity analyses resulted in 83 distinct clusters almost perfectly reflecting the expected number of species in Austria. Mean intraspecific distances of 0.22% were significantly lower than distances to closest relatives, resulting in a pronounced barcoding gap and unique Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) for most of the species. Four cases of BIN sharing were detected, pointing to hybridization and/or recent divergence, whereas in Phoxinus spp., Gobio spp. and Barbatula barbatula intraspecific splits, multiple BINs and consequently cryptic diversity were observed. The overall high identification success and clear genetic separation of most of the species confirms the applicability and accuracy of genetic methods for bio-surveillance. Furthermore, the new DNA barcoding data pinpoints cases of taxonomic uncertainty, which need to be addressed in further detail, to more precisely assort genetic lineages and their local distribution ranges in a new National Red-List.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Zangl
- Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Universalmuseum Joanneum, Studienzentrum Naturkunde, Graz, Austria
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Daniel Daill
- Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering—blattfisch e.U., Wels, Austria
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Marija Mladinić
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Josef Wanzenböck
- Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, University of Innsbruck, Mondsee, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pragmatic Applications and Universality of DNA Barcoding for Substantial Organisms at Species Level: A Review to Explore a Way Forward. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:1846485. [PMID: 35059459 PMCID: PMC8766189 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1846485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
DNA barcodes are regarded as hereditary succession codes that serve as a recognition marker to address several queries relating to the identification, classification, community ecology, and evolution of certain functional traits in organisms. The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1) gene as a DNA barcode is highly efficient for discriminating vertebrate and invertebrate animal species. Similarly, different specific markers are used for other organisms, including ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), maturase kinase (matK), transfer RNA-H and photosystem II D1-ApbsArabidopsis thaliana (trnH-psbA), and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) for plant species; 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), elongation factor Tu gene (Tuf gene), and chaperonin for bacterial strains; and nuclear ITS for fungal strains. Nevertheless, the taxon coverage of reference sequences is far from complete for genus or species-level identification. Applying the next-generation sequencing approach to the parallel acquisition of DNA barcode sequences could greatly expand the potential for library preparation or accurate identification in biodiversity research. Overall, this review articulates on the DNA barcoding technology as applied to different organisms, its universality, applicability, and innovative approach to handling DNA-based species identification.
Collapse
|
8
|
Raupach MJ, Hannig K, Morinière J, Hendrich L. A DNA barcode library for ground beetles of Germany: the genus Pterostichus Bonelli, 1810 and allied taxa (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae). Zookeys 2020; 980:93-117. [PMID: 33192140 PMCID: PMC7642132 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.980.55979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Species of the ground beetle genus Pterostichus Bonelli, 1810 are some of the most common carabids in Europe. This publication provides a first comprehensive DNA barcode library for this genus and allied taxa including Abax Bonelli, 1810, Molops Bonelli, 1810, Poecilus Bonelli, 1810, and Stomis Clairville, 1806 for Germany and Central Europe in general. DNA barcodes were analyzed from 609 individuals that represent 51 species, including sequences from previous studies as well as more than 198 newly generated sequences. The results showed a 1:1 correspondence between BIN and traditionally recognized species for 44 species (86%), whereas two (4%) species were characterized by two BINs. Three BINs were found for one species (2%), while one BIN for two species was revealed for two species pairs (8%). Low interspecific distances with maximum pairwise K2P values below 2.2% were found for four species pairs. Haplotype sharing was found for two closely related species pairs: Pterostichusadstrictus Eschscholtz, 1823/Pterostichusoblongopunctatus (Fabricius, 1787) and Pterostichusnigrita Paykull, 1790/Pterostichusrhaeticus Heer, 1837. In contrast to this, high intraspecific sequence divergences with values above 2.2% were shown for three species (Molopspiceus (Panzer, 1793), Pterostichuspanzeri (Panzer, 1805), Pterostichusstrenuus (Panzer, 1793)). Summarizing the results, the present DNA barcode library does not only allow the identification of most of the analyzed species, but also provides valuable information for alpha-taxonomy as well as for ecological and evolutionary research. This library represents another step in building a comprehensive DNA barcode library of ground beetles as part of modern biodiversity research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Raupach
- Sektion Hemiptera, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB - ZSM), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany
| | | | - Jérome Morinière
- AIM - Advanced Identification Methods GmbH, Spinnereistraße 11, 04179 Leipzig
| | - Lars Hendrich
- Sektion Insecta varia, Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB - ZSM), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Koroiva R, Rodrigues LRR, Santana DJ. DNA barcoding for identification of anuran species in the central region of South America. PeerJ 2020; 8:e10189. [PMID: 33150083 PMCID: PMC7585382 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of COI barcodes for specimen identification and species discovery has been a useful molecular approach for the study of Anura. Here, we establish a comprehensive amphibian barcode reference database in a central area of South America, in particular for specimens collected in Mato Grosso do Sul state (Brazil), and to evaluate the applicability of the COI gene for species-level identification. Both distance- and tree-based methods were applied for assessing species boundaries and the accuracy of specimen identification was evaluated. A total of 204 mitochondrial COI barcode sequences were evaluated from 22 genera and 59 species (19 newly barcoded species). Our results indicate that morphological and molecular identifications converge for most species, however, some species may present cryptic species due to high intraspecific variation, and there is a high efficiency of specimen identification. Thus, we show that COI sequencing can be used to identify anuran species present in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Koroiva
- Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
| | | | - Diego José Santana
- Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Holderegger R, Schmidt BR, Grünig C, Meier R, Csencsics D, Gassner M, Rellstab C, Stapfer A. Ready-to-use workflows for the implementation of genetic tools in conservation management. CONSERV GENET RESOUR 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12686-020-01165-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
AbstractWe present a conservation genetics tool kit, which offers two ready-to-use workflows for the routine application of genetic methods in conservation management. The workflows were optimized for work load and costs and are accompanied by an easy-to-read and richly illustrated manual with guidelines regarding sampling design, sampling of genetic material, necessary permits, laboratory methods, statistical analyses and documentation of results in a practice-oriented way. The manual also provides a detailed interpretation help for the implementation of the results in conservation management. One workflow deals with the identification of pond-breeding amphibians based on metabarcoding and environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples. This workflow also discriminates the morphologically similar water frogs (Pelophylax sp.) and other closely related species (e.g. Triturus cristatus and T. carnifex). The second workflow studies connectivity among populations using microsatellite markers. Its statistical analyses encompass the detection of genetic groups and historical, recent and current dispersal and gene flow. Using the two workflows does not involve academic research institutes; they can be applied by environmental consultancies, laboratories from the private sector, governmental agencies or non-governmental organisations. These and additional conservation genetic workflows will hopefully foster the routine use of genetic methods in conservation management.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zangl L, Daill D, Schweiger S, Gassner G, Koblmüller S. A reference DNA barcode library for Austrian amphibians and reptiles. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229353. [PMID: 32163447 PMCID: PMC7067431 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last few years, DNA barcoding became an established method for species identification in biodiversity inventories and monitoring studies. Such studies depend on the access to a comprehensive reference data base, covering all relevant taxa. Here we present a comprehensive DNA barcode inventory of all amphibian and reptile species native to Austria, except for the putatively extinct Vipera ursinii rakosiensis and Lissotriton helveticus, which has been only recently reported for the very western edge of Austria. A total of 194 DNA barcodes were generated in the framework of the Austrian Barcode of Life (ABOL) initiative. Species identification via DNA barcodes was successful for most species, except for the hybridogenetic species complex of water frogs (Pelophylax spp.) and the crested newts (Triturus spp.), in areas of sympatry. However, DNA barcoding also proved powerful in detecting deep conspecific lineages, e.g. within Natrix natrix or the wall lizard (Podarcis muralis), resulting in more than one Barcode Index Number (BIN) per species. Moreover, DNA barcodes revealed the presence of Natrix helvetica, which has been elevated to species level only recently, and genetic signatures of the Italian water frog Pelophylax bergeri in Western Austria for the first time. Comparison to previously published DNA barcoding data of European amphibians and reptiles corroborated the results of the Austrian data but also revealed certain peculiarities, underlining the particular strengths and in the case of the genus Pelophylax also the limitations of DNA barcoding. Consequently, DNA barcoding is not only powerful for species identification of all life stages of most Austrian amphibian and reptile species, but also for the detection of new species, the monitoring of gene flow or the presence of alien populations and/or species. Thus, DNA barcoding and the data generated in this study may serve both scientific and national or even transnational conservation purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Zangl
- Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Studienzentrum Naturkunde, Universalmuseum Joanneum, Graz, Austria
- * E-mail: (LZ); (SK)
| | - Daniel Daill
- Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Consultants in Aquatic Ecology and Engineering—blattfisch e.U., Wels, Austria
| | - Silke Schweiger
- First Zoological Department, Herpetological Collection, Museum of Natural History Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Gassner
- First Zoological Department, Herpetological Collection, Museum of Natural History Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Koblmüller
- Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- * E-mail: (LZ); (SK)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ashfaq M, Blagoev G, Tahir HM, Khan AM, Mukhtar MK, Akhtar S, Butt A, Mansoor S, Hebert PDN. Assembling a DNA barcode reference library for the spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Pakistan. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217086. [PMID: 31116764 PMCID: PMC6530854 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Morphological study of 1,795 spiders from sites across Pakistan placed these specimens in 27 families and 202 putative species. COI sequences >400 bp recovered from 1,782 specimens were analyzed using neighbor-joining trees, Bayesian inference, barcode gap, and Barcode Index Numbers (BINs). Specimens of 109 morphological species were assigned to 123 BINs with ten species showing BIN splits, while 93 interim species included representatives of 98 BINs. Maximum conspecific divergences ranged from 0-5.3% while congeneric distances varied from 2.8-23.2%. Excepting one species pair (Oxyopes azhari-Oxyopes oryzae), the maximum intraspecific distance was always less than the nearest-neighbor (NN) distance. Intraspecific divergence values were not significantly correlated with geographic distance. Most (75%) BINs detected in this study were new to science, while those shared with other nations mainly derived from India. The discovery of many new, potentially endemic species and the low level of BIN overlap with other nations highlight the importance of constructing regional DNA barcode reference libraries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ashfaq
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Gergin Blagoev
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Arif M. Khan
- Department of Biotechnology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
| | | | - Saleem Akhtar
- Directorate of Entomology, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Abida Butt
- Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shahid Mansoor
- National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Paul D. N. Hebert
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hofmann EP, Nicholson KE, Luque-Montes IR, Köhler G, Cerrato-Mendoza CA, Medina-Flores M, Wilson LD, Townsend JH. Cryptic Diversity, but to What Extent? Discordance Between Single-Locus Species Delimitation Methods Within Mainland Anoles (Squamata: Dactyloidae) of Northern Central America. Front Genet 2019; 10:11. [PMID: 30804976 PMCID: PMC6378269 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-locus molecular barcoding is a useful method for identifying overlooked and undescribed biodiversity, providing the groundwork for further systematic study and taxonomic investigation. A variety of methods for delimiting species from barcoding libraries have been developed and applied, allowing for rapid estimates of species diversity in a broad range of taxa. However, tree-based and distance-based analyses can infer different group assignments, potentially over- or underestimating the number of putative species groups. Here, we explore diversity of mainland species of anole lizards from the Chortís Block biogeographical province of northern Central America using a DNA barcoding approach, generating and analyzing cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences for over 400 samples assignable to 33 of 38 (86.8%) native and one introduced mainland species. We subsequently tested the effects different models of nucleotide substitution, different species-delimitation algorithms, and reducing our dataset had on species delimitation estimates. We performed of two distance-based (ABGD, RESL) and three tree-based (bPTP, mPTP, GMYC) analyses on both the full dataset and a dataset consisting only of unique halotypes. From 34 nominal taxa, analyses of the full dataset recovered between 34 and 64 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), while analyses of the reduced dataset inferred between 36 and 59. Reassigning individuals to either mPTP-inferred or ABGD clustered (7.2% threshold) groups improved the detection of a barcoding gap across three different models of nucleotide substitution, removing overlap between intra- and interspecific distances. Our results highlight the underestimated diversity of mainland Chortís Block anoles, but the lack of congruence between analyses demonstrates the importance of considering multiple analytical methods when dealing with single-locus datasets. We recommend future studies consider the effects of different models of nucleotide substitution on proposed barcoding gaps, as well as the effect reducing a dataset to unique haplotypes may have on proposed diversity estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erich P. Hofmann
- Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, United States
- Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Kirsten E. Nicholson
- Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States
| | | | - Gunther Köhler
- Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - César A. Cerrato-Mendoza
- Federación Hondureña de Deportes de Montaña Y Escalada, Departamento de Francisco Morazán, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Melissa Medina-Flores
- Federación Hondureña de Deportes de Montaña Y Escalada, Departamento de Francisco Morazán, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Larry David Wilson
- Centro Zamorano de Biodiversidad, Escuela Agrícola Panamericana Zamorano, Departamento de Francisco Morazán, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Josiah H. Townsend
- Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chiovitti A, Thorpe F, Gorman C, Cuxson JL, Robevska G, Szwed C, Duncan JC, Vanyai HK, Cross J, Siemering KR, Sumner J. A citizen science model for implementing statewide educational DNA barcoding. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0208604. [PMID: 30629584 PMCID: PMC6328199 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Our aim was to develop a widely available educational program in which students conducted authentic research that met the expectations of both the scientific and educational communities. This paper describes the development and implementation of a citizen science project based on DNA barcoding of reptile specimens obtained from the Museums Victoria frozen tissue collection. The student program was run by the Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC) and was delivered as a "one day plus one lesson" format incorporating a one-day wet laboratory workshop followed by a single lesson at school utilising online bioinformatics tools. The project leveraged the complementary resources and expertise of the research and educational partners to generate robust scientific data that could be analysed with confidence, meet the requirements of the Victorian state education curriculum, and provide participating students with an enhanced learning experience. During two 1-week stints in 2013 and 2014, 406 students mentored by 44 postgraduate university students participated in the project. Students worked mainly in pairs to process ~200 tissue samples cut from 53 curated reptile specimens representing 17 species. A total of 27 novel Cytochrome Oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) sequences were ultimately generated for 8 south-east Australian reptile species of the families Scincidae and Agamidae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Chiovitti
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Frazer Thorpe
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Gorman
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer L. Cuxson
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gorjana Robevska
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher Szwed
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacinta C. Duncan
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hannah K. Vanyai
- Gene Technology Access Centre (GTAC), The University High School, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph Cross
- Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kirby R. Siemering
- Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanna Sumner
- Museums Victoria, Carlton Gardens, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Beermann J, Westbury MV, Hofreiter M, Hilgers L, Deister F, Neumann H, Raupach MJ. Cryptic species in a well-known habitat: applying taxonomics to the amphipod genus Epimeria (Crustacea, Peracarida). Sci Rep 2018; 8:6893. [PMID: 29720606 PMCID: PMC5931980 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25225-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Taxonomy plays a central role in biological sciences. It provides a communication system for scientists as it aims to enable correct identification of the studied organisms. As a consequence, species descriptions should seek to include as much available information as possible at species level to follow an integrative concept of 'taxonomics'. Here, we describe the cryptic species Epimeria frankei sp. nov. from the North Sea, and also redescribe its sister species, Epimeria cornigera. The morphological information obtained is substantiated by DNA barcodes and complete nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences. In addition, we provide, for the first time, full mitochondrial genome data as part of a metazoan species description for a holotype, as well as the neotype. This study represents the first successful implementation of the recently proposed concept of taxonomics, using data from high-throughput technologies for integrative taxonomic studies, allowing the highest level of confidence for both biodiversity and ecological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Beermann
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Functional Ecology, PO Box 120161, 27515, Bremerhaven, Germany.
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Helgoland, Germany.
- Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, Oldenburg, Germany.
| | - Michael V Westbury
- University of Potsdam, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Michael Hofreiter
- University of Potsdam, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Leon Hilgers
- University of Potsdam, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany
- Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Deister
- Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 2503, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Neumann
- Senckenberg am Meer, Department for Marine Research, Südstrand 40, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Michael J Raupach
- Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Institute for Biology and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 2503, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany
- Senckenberg am Meer, German Center of Marine Biodiversity (DZMB), Südstrand 44, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu J, Jiang J, Song S, Tornabene L, Chabarria R, Naylor GJP, Li C. Multilocus DNA barcoding - Species Identification with Multilocus Data. Sci Rep 2017; 7:16601. [PMID: 29192249 PMCID: PMC5709489 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16920-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Species identification using DNA sequences, known as DNA barcoding has been widely used in many applied fields. Current barcoding methods are usually based on a single mitochondrial locus, such as cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). This type of barcoding method does not always work when applied to species separated by short divergence times or that contain introgressed genes from closely related species. Herein we introduce a more effective multi-locus barcoding framework that is based on gene capture and "next-generation" sequencing. We selected 500 independent nuclear markers for ray-finned fishes and designed a three-step pipeline for multilocus DNA barcoding. We applied our method on two exemplar datasets each containing a pair of sister fish species: Siniperca chuatsi vs. Sini. kneri and Sicydium altum vs. Sicy. adelum, where the COI barcoding approach failed. Both of our empirical and simulated results demonstrated that under limited gene flow and enough separation time, we could correctly identify species using multilocus barcoding method. We anticipate that, as the cost of DNA sequencing continues to fall that our multilocus barcoding approach will eclipse existing single-locus DNA barcoding methods as a means to better understand the diversity of the living world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junning Liu
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai, 201306, China
- Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201306, China
- National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai, 201306, China
| | - Jiamei Jiang
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai, 201306, China
- Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201306, China
- National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai, 201306, China
| | - Shuli Song
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai, 201306, China
- Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201306, China
- National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai, 201306, China
| | - Luke Tornabene
- School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Ryan Chabarria
- College of Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412-5806, USA
| | | | - Chenhong Li
- Shanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai, 201306, China.
- Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201306, China.
- National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education (Shanghai Ocean University), Shanghai, 201306, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao H, Yang J, Wang C, Li P, Murphy RW, Che J, Yuan Z. A new species of the genus Rana from Henan, central China (Anura, Ranidae). Zookeys 2017:95-108. [PMID: 29134001 PMCID: PMC5672780 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.694.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A new species of brown frog Rana luanchuanensis Zhao & Yuan, sp. n. is described from Luanchuan County, western Henan, central China. The mitochondrial genealogy suggests that the new species is the sister taxon to the clade including R. amurensis and R. coreana, and is separated by uncorrected pairwise distances more than 12.5%. Morphologically, this new species differs from its congeners by a suite of characters. Analyses of partial sequences of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) resolve the new species as a single matriline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haipeng Zhao
- Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China.,Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China.,School of Life Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China
| | - Junxiao Yang
- Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China.,Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China
| | - Chunping Wang
- Henan Forestry Survey and Planning Institute, Zhengzhou 450045, Henan, China
| | - Pipeng Li
- Center for Chinese Endemic Herp-breeding and Conservation Research, and Liaoning Key Laboratory of Evolution and Biodiversity, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, China
| | - Robert W Murphy
- Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China.,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto M5S 2C6, Canada
| | - Jing Che
- Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koroiva R, Pepinelli M, Rodrigues ME, Roque FDO, Lorenz-Lemke AP, Kvist S. DNA barcoding of odonates from the Upper Plata basin: Database creation and genetic diversity estimation. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182283. [PMID: 28763495 PMCID: PMC5538745 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 07/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a DNA barcoding study of Neotropical odonates from the Upper Plata basin, Brazil. A total of 38 species were collected in a transition region of "Cerrado" and Atlantic Forest, both regarded as biological hotspots, and 130 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcodes were generated for the collected specimens. The distinct gap between intraspecific (0-2%) and interspecific variation (15% and above) in COI, and resulting separation of Barcode Index Numbers (BIN), allowed for successful identification of specimens in 94% of cases. The 6% fail rate was due to a shared BIN between two separate nominal species. DNA barcoding, based on COI, thus seems to be a reliable and efficient tool for identifying Neotropical odonate specimens down to the species level. These results underscore the utility of DNA barcoding to aid specimen identification in diverse biological hotspots, areas that require urgent action regarding taxonomic surveys and biodiversity conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Koroiva
- Ecology and Conservation Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| | - Mateus Pepinelli
- Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marciel Elio Rodrigues
- Laboratório de Organismos Aquáticos, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabio de Oliveira Roque
- Laboratório de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| | - Aline Pedroso Lorenz-Lemke
- Laboratório de Evolução e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
| | - Sebastian Kvist
- Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hawlitschek O, Morinière J, Lehmann GUC, Lehmann AW, Kropf M, Dunz A, Glaw F, Detcharoen M, Schmidt S, Hausmann A, Szucsich NU, Caetano-Wyler SA, Haszprunar G. DNA barcoding of crickets, katydids and grasshoppers (Orthoptera) from Central Europe with focus on Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Mol Ecol Resour 2016; 17:1037-1053. [PMID: 27863033 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Revised: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We present a DNA barcoding study on the insect order Orthoptera that was generated in collaboration between four barcoding projects in three countries, viz. Barcoding Fauna Bavarica (Germany), German Barcode of Life, Austrian Barcode of Life and Swiss Barcode of Life. Our data set includes 748 COI sequences from 127 of the 162 taxa (78.4%) recorded in the three countries involved. Ninety-three of these 122 species (76.2%, including all Ensifera) can be reliably identified using DNA barcodes. The remaining 26 caeliferan species (families Acrididae and Tetrigidae) form ten clusters that share barcodes among up to five species, in three cases even across different genera, and in six cases even sharing individual barcodes. We discuss incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization as most likely causes of this phenomenon, as the species concerned are phylogenetically young and hybridization has been previously observed. We also highlight the problem of nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts), a known problem in the barcoding of orthopteran species, and the possibility of Wolbachia infections. Finally, we discuss the possible taxonomic implications of our barcoding results and point out future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Hawlitschek
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany.,Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Morinière
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - G U C Lehmann
- Department of Biology, Behavioural Physiology, Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - A W Lehmann
- Orthoptera Working Group Brandenburg and Berlin, Friedensallee 37, 14532, Stahnsdorf, Germany
| | - M Kropf
- Institute for Integrative Nature Conservation Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Gregor Mendel-Str. 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Dunz
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - F Glaw
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - M Detcharoen
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - S Schmidt
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - A Hausmann
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany
| | - N U Szucsich
- 3rd Zoological Dep., Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria
| | - S A Caetano-Wyler
- Université de Genève, Département de Génétique et Evolution, Quai Ernest Ansermet 30, 1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | - G Haszprunar
- Zoologische Staatssammlung München (SNSB-ZSM), Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247, München, Germany.,Department Biology II and GeoBio-Center of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Groβhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Geiger MF, Moriniere J, Hausmann A, Haszprunar G, Wägele W, Hebert PDN, Rulik B. Testing the Global Malaise Trap Program - How well does the current barcode reference library identify flying insects in Germany? Biodivers Data J 2016:e10671. [PMID: 27932930 PMCID: PMC5136679 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.4.e10671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biodiversity patterns are inherently complex and difficult to comprehensively assess. Yet, deciphering shifts in species composition through time and space are crucial for efficient and successful management of ecosystem services, as well as for predicting change. To better understand species diversity patterns, Germany participated in the Global Malaise Trap Program, a world-wide collection program for arthropods using this sampling method followed by their DNA barcode analysis. Traps were deployed at two localities: “Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald” in Bavaria, the largest terrestrial Natura 2000 area in Germany, and the nature conservation area Landskrone, an EU habitats directive site in the Rhine Valley. Arthropods were collected from May to September to track shifts in the taxonomic composition and temporal succession at these locations. New information In total, 37,274 specimens were sorted and DNA barcoded, resulting in 5,301 different genetic clusters (BINs, Barcode Index Numbers, proxy for species) with just 7.6% of their BINs shared. Accumulation curves for the BIN count versus the number of specimens analyzed suggest that about 63% of the potential diversity at these sites was recovered with this single season of sampling. Diversity at both sites rose from May (496 & 565 BINs) to July (1,236 & 1,522 BINs) before decreasing in September (572 & 504 BINs). Unambiguous species names were assigned to 35% of the BINs (1,868) which represented 12,640 specimens. Another 7% of the BINs (386) with 1,988 specimens were assigned to genus, while 26% (1,390) with 12,092 specimens were only placed to a family. These results illustrate how a comprehensive DNA barcode reference library can identify unknown specimens, but also reveal how this potential is constrained by gaps in the quantity and quality of records in BOLD, especially for Hymenoptera and Diptera. As voucher specimens are available for morphological study, we invite taxonomic experts to assist in the identification of unnamed BINs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang Wägele
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| | - Paul D N Hebert
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
| | - Björn Rulik
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Geiger MF, Astrin JJ, Borsch T, Burkhardt U, Grobe P, Hand R, Hausmann A, Hohberg K, Krogmann L, Lutz M, Monje C, Misof B, Morinière J, Müller K, Pietsch S, Quandt D, Rulik B, Scholler M, Traunspurger W, Haszprunar G, Wägele W. How to tackle the molecular species inventory for an industrialized nation-lessons from the first phase of the German Barcode of Life initiative GBOL (2012-2015). Genome 2016; 59:661-70. [PMID: 27314158 DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Biodiversity loss is mainly driven by human activity. While concern grows over the fate of hot spots of biodiversity, contemporary species losses still prevail in industrialized nations. Therefore, strategies were formulated to halt or reverse the loss, driven by evidence for its value for ecosystem services. Maintenance of the latter through conservation depends on correctly identified species. To this aim, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research is funding the GBOL project, a consortium of natural history collections, botanic gardens, and universities working on a barcode reference database for the country's fauna and flora. Several noticeable findings could be useful for future campaigns: (i) validating taxon lists to serve as a taxonomic backbone is time-consuming, but without alternative; (ii) offering financial incentives to taxonomic experts, often citizen scientists, is indispensable; (iii) completion of the libraries for widespread species enables analyses of environmental samples, but the process may not hold pace with technological advancements; (iv) discoveries of new species are among the best stories for the media; (v) a commitment to common data standards and repositories is needed, as well as transboundary cooperation between nations; (vi) after validation, all data should be published online via the BOLD to make them searchable for external users and to allow cross-checking with data from other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Geiger
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - J J Astrin
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - T Borsch
- b Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - U Burkhardt
- d Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz, Am Museum 1, 02826 Görlitz, Germany
| | - P Grobe
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - R Hand
- b Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - A Hausmann
- c SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany
| | - K Hohberg
- d Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz, Am Museum 1, 02826 Görlitz, Germany
| | - L Krogmann
- e Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - M Lutz
- j Plant Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - C Monje
- e Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - B Misof
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - J Morinière
- c SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany
| | - K Müller
- f Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Hüfferstrasse 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - S Pietsch
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - D Quandt
- g Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - B Rulik
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - M Scholler
- h Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Erbprinzenstr. 13, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - W Traunspurger
- i Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - G Haszprunar
- c SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany
| | - W Wägele
- a Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|