1
|
Lee YH, Song GG. A meta-analysis of the association between the ATIC 347 C/G polymorphism and methotrexate responsiveness and toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 64:152337. [PMID: 38071832 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether the 347 C/G polymorphism in the 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) gene predicts the responsiveness to or toxicity of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD To identify relevant publications, we searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. We performed a meta-analysis of studies on the relationship between the ATIC 347 C/G polymorphism and MTX toxicity or non-responsiveness in patients with RA. RESULTS Thirteen studies consisting of 3,185 patients with RA satisfied our inclusion criteria. The analysis included 10 studies on MTX responsiveness and seven studies on MTX toxicity in patients with RA in connection with ATIC 347C/G polymorphism. According to our meta-analysis, the ATIC 347 GG genotype and failure to respond to MTX treatment were significantly associated (OR = 0.741, 95% CI = 0.591-0.929, p=0.009). According to stratification by ethnicity, this genotype was significantly associated with non-responsiveness to MTX in Europeans (OR=0.548, 95% CI=0.377-0.796, p=0.002) but not in Asian populations (OR=0.882, 95% CI=0.665-1.1172, p=0.388). However, analyses employing allelic, dominant, and homozygous contrast models failed to detect any relationship between the polymorphism and the failure to respond to MXT. However, the ATIC 347GG genotype and MTX toxicity were not associated (OR=1.278, 95% CI=0.937-1.745, p=0.121). Asian and European populations showed no evidence of a relationship between the ATIC 347GG genotype and MTX toxicity (OR=1.252, 95% CI=0.905-1.732, p=0.175 and OR =1.617, 95% CI=0.549-4.765, p=0.383, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis revealed that ATIC 347 C/G polymorphism was related to non-responsiveness to MTX in European populations with RA. However, no significant correlation was found with MTX toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Ho Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.
| | - Gwan Gyu Song
- Department of Rheumatology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dua AB, Ford K, Fiore S, Pappas DA, Janak JC, Blachley T, Roberts-Toler C, Emeanuru K, Kremer JM, Kivitz A. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Switching Between Interleukin-6-Receptor Inhibitors and Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Findings from an Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1753-1768. [PMID: 37906399 PMCID: PMC10654323 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This observational study evaluated response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) to a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) and vice versa. METHODS Adult patients with RA, who initiated IL-6Ri or JAKi (following discontinuation of JAKi or IL-6Ri, respectively) during/after December 2012 and had a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and the follow-up visit. Continuous outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), pain, fatigue, tender joint count, swollen joint count, Physician Global Assessment (MDGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), and morning stiffness duration. Categorical outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving CDAI low disease activity (LDA), remission, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for HAQ, pain, fatigue, MDGA, and PtGA. Continuous outcomes were summarized as mean changes from baseline, and categorical outcomes as response rates. Differences in the outcome measures between groups were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS Between IL-6Ri (n = 100) and JAKi initiators (n = 129), no significant differences were noted for continuous outcomes. Within both groups, a significant proportion of patients achieved LDA, remission, and MCIDs for other measures, although the odds of achieving LDA were higher among IL-6Ri (vs. JAKi) initiators with moderate-to-severe disease (adjusted odds ratio: 3.30 [1.01, 10.78]). CONCLUSIONS Patients with RA can achieve improvement in response when switching between IL-6Ri and JAKi. Although both therapies affect the IL-6 pathway, there are distinct mechanisms of action, which likely contribute to their clinical improvement, when reciprocally switched as follow-on treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha B Dua
- Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kerri Ford
- Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios A Pappas
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Corrona Research Foundation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel M Kremer
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song YJ, Cho SK, Kim H, Kim HW, Nam E, Choi CB, Kim TH, Jun JB, Bae SC, Yoo DH, Sung YK. Factors associated with selection of targeted therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280234. [PMID: 36626396 PMCID: PMC9831325 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deciding which drug to choose for targeted therapy is an important step in sequential treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to identify factors for selecting Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) rather than biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA in real-world practice. METHODS We selected RA patients starting JAKis or bDMARDs from single-center prospective cohorts in Korea. Patients were divided into JAKi, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, and non-TNF inhibitor groups. We performed multinomial logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with selecting JAKis. RESULTS 145, 205, and 89 patients were included in the JAKi, TNF inhibitor, and non-TNF inhibitor groups. In multinomial regression analysis, the JAKi group was older than the TNF inhibitor group (OR 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05) but younger than the non-TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.97, CI 0.95-1.00). The JAKi group was less likely to have chronic pulmonary diseases compared with the TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.07, CI 0.01-0.56) or the non-TNF inhibitor group (OR 0.06, CI 0.01-0.50). Higher disease activity assessed by physician (OR 1.80, CI 1.51-2.38) and previous tacrolimus use (OR 2.05, CI 1.20-3.51) were factors suggesting selection of JAKis than TNF inhibitors. CONCLUSION Age, pulmonary comorbidities, previous tacrolimus use, and high disease activity assessed by physician were factors influencing the selection of JAKis for RA patients in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeo-Jin Song
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Kyung Cho
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyoungyoung Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Won Kim
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunwoo Nam
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan-Bum Choi
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Bum Jun
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Cheol Bae
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Hyun Yoo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Hanyang University Institute for Rheumatology Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan Y, Buch MH. 'Difficult to treat' rheumatoid arthritis: current position and considerations for next steps. RMD Open 2022; 8:e002387. [PMID: 35896282 PMCID: PMC9335059 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recently defined difficult to treat (D2T) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provided points to consider in its management. This review summarises the key concepts of D2T-RA that underpinned this recent guidance. D2T-RA is primarily characterised by failure of at least two different mechanism of action biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARDs) with evidence of active/progressive disease. The basis for progressive disease, however, is not limited to clear inflammatory joint pathology, capturing wider contributors to treatment cycling such as comorbidity, obesity and fibromyalgia. This means D2T-RA comprises a heterogeneous population, with a proportion within this exhibiting bona fide treatment-refractory disease. The management points to consider, however, emphasise the importance of checking for the presence of inflammatory pathology before further treatment change. This review suggests additional considerations in the definition of D2T-RA, the potential value in identifying D2T traits and intervening before the development of D2T-RA state and the need for real world evidence of targeted synthetic DMARD in this population to compare to recent trial data. Finally, the review asks whether the presence of D2T-RA implies a failure to treat effectively from the outset, and the need for pharmacological and non-pharmacological management approaches to address the wider D2T-RA population effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Tan
- Kellgren centre for Rheumatology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A retrospective study of the efficacy of JAK inhibitors or abatacept on rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease. Inflammopharmacology 2022; 30:705-712. [PMID: 35462572 PMCID: PMC9135879 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-022-00936-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To examine the effectiveness of Janus-kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or abatacept (ABA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods Patients with RA-ILD receiving JAKis or ABA were retrospectively evaluated at baseline and after 18 months of treatment. A computer-aided method (CaM) was used to assess the extent of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) fibrosis percentage. According to HRCT fibrosis changes, patients were classified as “worsened” (progression of 15% or more), “stable” (changes within 15%) or “improved” (reduction of 15% or more). Correlations between RA characteristics and JAKis or ABA responses were studied using a multivariate regression model. Results Seventy-five patients (69.3% women) were evaluated, 31 received a JAKi while 44 received ABA. In the JAKis group, five patients (16.1%) showed RA-ILD progression, 20 patients (64.5%) were considered stable, and six patients (19.4%) demonstrated RA-ILD improvement. In the ABA group, five patients (11.3%) showed RA-ILD progression, 32 patients (72.7%) were stable, and seven patients (16.0%) demonstrated RA-ILD improvement. In both groups, the percentage of current smokers was different between those classified as "worsened" and those classified as "improved/stable" (p = 0.01). In multivariate regression analysis, current smoking habit (p = 0.0051) and concomitant methotrexate treatment (p = 0.0078) were the two variables related to RA-ILD progression in ABA-treated patients, whereas in JAKis-treated patients, the only RA-ILD progression-related variable was disease duration of RA (p < 0.001). Conclusions Treatment with JAKis or ABA was related to stability or improvement of RA-ILD in 83.9% and 88.6% of patients, respectively. RA duration is the only variable associated with worsening RA-ILD in JAKis-treated patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nagy G, Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PMJ, Kedves M, Hamar A, van der Goes MC, Kent A, Bakkers M, Pchelnikova P, Blaas E, Senolt L, Szekanecz Z, Choy EH, Dougados M, Jacobs JW, Geenen R, Bijlsma JW, Zink A, Aletaha D, Schoneveld L, van Riel P, Dumas S, Prior Y, Nikiphorou E, Ferraccioli G, Schett G, Hyrich KL, Mueller-Ladner U, Buch MH, McInnes IB, van der Heijde D, van Laar JM. EULAR points to consider for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:20-33. [PMID: 34407926 PMCID: PMC8761998 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence-based European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) points to consider (PtCs) for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA). METHODS An EULAR Task Force was established comprising 34 individuals: 26 rheumatologists, patient partners and rheumatology experienced health professionals. Two systematic literature reviews addressed clinical questions around diagnostic challenges, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in D2T RA. PtCs were formulated based on the identified evidence and expert opinion. Strength of recommendations (SoR, scale A-D: A typically consistent level 1 studies and D level 5 evidence or inconsistent studies) and level of agreement (LoA, scale 0-10: 0 completely disagree and 10 completely agree) of the PtCs were determined by the Task Force members. RESULTS Two overarching principles and 11 PtCs were defined concerning diagnostic confirmation of RA, evaluation of inflammatory disease activity, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, treatment adherence, functional disability, pain, fatigue, goal setting and self-efficacy and the impact of comorbidities. The SoR varied from level C to level D. The mean LoA with the overarching principles and PtCs was generally high (8.4-9.6). CONCLUSIONS These PtCs for D2T RA can serve as a clinical roadmap to support healthcare professionals and patients to deliver holistic management and more personalised pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies. High-quality evidence was scarce. A research agenda was created to guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- György Nagy
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary .,Department of Genetics, Cell and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nadia M T Roodenrijs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melinda Kedves
- Bács-Kiskun County Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Attila Hamar
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alison Kent
- Salisbury Foundation Trust NHS Hospital, Wiltshire, UK
| | - Margot Bakkers
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Polina Pchelnikova
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Etienne Blaas
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ladislav Senolt
- Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zoltan Szekanecz
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Ernest H Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Université de Paris Department of Rheumatology - Hôpital Cochin. Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris INSERM (U1153) Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Johannes Wg Jacobs
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rinie Geenen
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Wj Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Zink
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Leonard Schoneveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | - Piet van Riel
- Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Dumas
- Department of Pharmacy, Marin Hospital, Asisstance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hendaye, France
| | - Yeliz Prior
- School of Health and Society, Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.,Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Georg Schett
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ulf Mueller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Maya H Buch
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Jacob M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang Z, Huang M, Yu B, Huang Y, Zheng S, Yang X, Ning H. Comparison of the efficacy and safety indicators of DMARDs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e26524. [PMID: 34398007 PMCID: PMC8294891 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety indicators of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Sarilumab, Sirukumab, Baricitinib, Tocilizumab and Adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis treatment by a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, The Food and Drug Administration web site, and Cochrane library were searched from build to June 1, 2020. Clinical randomized controlled trails of these 5 drugs for rheumatoid arthritis were collected for network meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4 randomized controlled trails with 2070 patients were obtained. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that: (1).. There was no significant difference between the 4 drugs (Sarilumab, Sirukumab, Adalimumab, and Tocilizumab) (P > .05) in terms of American College of Rheumatology 20. (2).. There was no significant difference between the 5 drugs in the aspect of the America College of Rheumatology 50% and 70% (American College of Rheumatology 50, American College of Rheumatology 70) (P > .05). (3).. There was no significant difference between the 3 drugs (Sarilumab, Sirukumab, Adalimumab) in terms of reducing disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients (P > .05). (4).. No significant difference was observed among the 5 drugs in terms of incidence of adverse reactions, serious adverse reactions and withdrawal adverse reactions (P > .05). The results of the ranked probability plot indicated that Tocilizumab and Sarilumab outperform other drugs in terms of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: The results of the ranking of the 5 drugs showed that Tocilizumab and Sarilumab had the best efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zunlian Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Min Huang
- Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Nuring Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Bin Yu
- Department of Pharmacy, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Yilan Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Silin Zheng
- Nuring Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Xuping Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Hong Ning
- Department of Pharmacy, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li KJ, Chang CL, Hsin CY, Tang CH. Switching and Discontinuation Pattern of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Tofacitinib for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:628548. [PMID: 34366836 PMCID: PMC8333863 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.628548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease characterized by persistent joint synovial inflammation and swelling, leading to cartilage damage and bone erosion. This retrospective, longitudinal study is to evaluate the treatment patterns of biologic-naïve RA patients receiving index biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and tofacitinib by the data of Taiwan National Healthcare Insurance Claims and the Death Registry between 2012 and 2017. Drug survival and treatment patterns were determined by investigating the occurrence of switching and discontinuation from index treatment. At baseline, 70.0% of patients used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) bDMARD with the majority taking etanercept (27.0%) or adalimumab (26.2%). During the follow-up period, 40.0% (n = 3,464) of index users switched (n = 1,479) or discontinued (n = 1,985) the treatment with an average incidence rate of 0.18 per patient-year. Among the six index treatment groups, drug survival was the lowest for adalimumab and highest for tocilizumab. When compared with etanercept, only adalimumab had a higher cumulative probability of switching/discontinuation (adjusted HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.28), whereas golimumab, non-TNFi bDMARDs and tofacitinib were significantly less probable to switch or discontinue. For patients switching the index treatment, tocilizumab (31.2%) and tofacitinib (23.4%) were the main regimens being switched to. In addition, 48.2% of patients who discontinued the index treatment received further retreatment, and 63.8-77.0% of them were retreated with same agent. In conclusion, this population-based study found that TNFi were the preferred agents as the index treatments during 2012-2017. Non-TNFi and tofacitinib were more common second-line agents being switched to. Nearly half of discontinued patients received retreatment, with a majority receiving the same agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko-Jen Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Li Chang
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - Chao-Hsiun Tang
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Márquez Pete N, Maldonado Montoro MDM, Pérez Ramírez C, Martínez Martínez F, Martínez de la Plata JE, Daddaoua A, Jiménez Morales A. Influence of the FCGR2A rs1801274 and FCGR3A rs396991 Polymorphisms on Response to Abatacept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11060573. [PMID: 34207385 PMCID: PMC8233911 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abatacept (ABA) is an immunosuppressant indicated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Effectiveness might be influenced by clinical RA variants and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding protein FCGR2A (His131Arg) and FCGR3A (Phe158Val) involved in pharmacokinetics of ABA. An observational cohort study was conducted in 120 RA Caucasian patients treated with ABA for 6 and 12 months. Patients with the FCGR2A rs1801274-AA genotype (FCGR2A-p.131His) showed a better EULAR response (OR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.01-5.92) at 12 months and low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months (OR = 3.16; 95% CI = 1.19-8.66) and 12 months (OR = 6.62; 95% CI = 1.25-46.89) of treatment with ABA. A tendency was observed towards an association between the FCGR3A rs396991-A allele (FCGR3A-p.158Phe) and better therapeutic response to ABA after 12 months of treatment (p = 0.078). Moreover, we found a significant association between the low-affinity FCGR2A/FCGR3A haplotypes variable and LDA after 12 months of ABA treatment (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.01-2.58). The clinical variables associated with better response to ABA were lower age at starting ABA (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02-1.11) and greater duration of ABA treatment (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.04), lower duration of previous biological therapies (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.98-0.99), non-administration of concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (OR = 24.53; 95% CI = 3.46-523.80), non-use of concomitant glucocorticoids (OR = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.02-0.47), monotherapy (OR = 19.22; 95% CI = 2.05-343.00), lower initial patient's visual analogue scale (PVAS) value (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92-0.97), and lower baseline ESR (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.87-0.97). This study showed that high-affinity FCGR2A-p.131His variant, low-affinity FCGR3A-p.158Phe variant, and combined use of FCGR2A/FCGR3A genetic variations could affect ABA effectiveness. Further studies will be required to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Márquez Pete
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain; (N.M.P.); (A.J.M.)
| | | | - Cristina Pérez Ramírez
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain; (N.M.P.); (A.J.M.)
- Center of Biomedical Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology “José Mataix”, University of Granada, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n., 18016 Granada, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Fernando Martínez Martínez
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Social and Legal Assistance Pharmacy Section, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain;
| | | | - Abdelali Daddaoua
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain;
| | - Alberto Jiménez Morales
- Pharmacy Service, Pharmacogenetics Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain; (N.M.P.); (A.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown RA, Barbar-Smiley F, Yildirim-Toruner C, Ardura MI, Ardoin SP, Akoghlanian S. Reintroduction of immunosuppressive medications in pediatric rheumatology patients with histoplasmosis: a case series. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2021; 19:84. [PMID: 34098976 PMCID: PMC8185916 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00581-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with rheumatic diseases (cRD) receiving immunosuppressive medications (IM) are at a higher risk for acquiring potentially lethal pathogens, including Histoplasma capsulatum (histoplasmosis), a fungal infection that can lead to prolonged hospitalization, organ damage, and death. Withholding IM during serious infections is recommended yet poses risk of rheumatic disease flares. Conversely, reinitiating IM increases risk for infection recurrence. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFai) biologic therapy carries the highest risk for histoplasmosis infection after epidemiological exposure, so other IM are preferred during active histoplasmosis infection. There is limited guidance as to when and how IM can be reinitiated in cRD with histoplasmosis. This case series chronicles resumption of IM, including non-TNFai biologics, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and corticosteroids, following histoplasmosis among cRD. CASE PRESENTATION We examine clinical characteristics and outcomes of 9 patients with disseminated or pulmonary histoplasmosis and underlying rheumatic disease [juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)] after reintroduction of IM. All DMARDs and biologics were halted at histoplasmosis diagnosis, except hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and patients began antifungals. Following IM discontinuation, all patients required systemic or intra-articular steroids during histoplasmosis treatment, with 4/9 showing Cushingoid features. Four patients began new IM regimens [2 abatacept (ABA), 1 HCQ, and 1 methotrexate (MTX)] while still positive for histoplasmosis, with 3/4 (ABA, MTX, HCQ) later clearing their histoplasmosis and 1 (ABA) showing decreasing antigenemia. Collectively, 8/9 patients initiated or continued DMARDs and/or non-TNFai biologic use (5 ABA, 1 tocilizumab, 1 ustekinumab, 3 MTX, 4 HCQ, 1 leflunomide). No fatalities, exacerbations, or recurrences of histoplasmosis occurred during follow-up (median 33 months). CONCLUSIONS In our cohort of cRD, histoplasmosis course following reintroduction of non-TNFai IM was favorable, but additional studies are needed to evaluate optimal IM management during acute histoplasmosis and recovery. In this case series, non-TNFai biologic, DMARD, and steroid treatments did not appear to cause histoplasmosis recurrence. Adverse events from corticosteroid use were common. Further research is needed to implement guidelines for optimal use of non-TNFai (like ABA), DMARDs, and corticosteroids in cRD following histoplasmosis presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A. Brown
- grid.261331.40000 0001 2285 7943The Ohio State University College of Medicine, OH Columbus, USA
| | - Fatima Barbar-Smiley
- grid.240344.50000 0004 0392 3476Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio Columbus, USA
| | | | - Monica I. Ardura
- grid.240344.50000 0004 0392 3476Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio Columbus, USA
| | - Stacy P. Ardoin
- grid.240344.50000 0004 0392 3476Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio Columbus, USA
| | - Shoghik Akoghlanian
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio, Columbus, USA. .,Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 555 S. 18th St, OH, 43205, Columbus, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Best JH, Kuang Y, Jiang Y, Singh R, Karabis A, Uyei J, Dang J, Reiss WG. Comparative Efficacy (DAS28 Remission) of Targeted Immune Modulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Rheumatol Ther 2021; 8:693-710. [PMID: 34037968 PMCID: PMC8217484 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00322-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of targeted immune modulators (TIMs) in TIM-naïve/mixed populations (≤ 20% TIM-experienced) and TIM-experienced (> 20% TIM-experienced) adults with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to or intolerance of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). METHODS A fixed-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using published study-level data from 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from two recent systematic literature reviews conducted by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, and two additional phase III trials for filgotinib (FINCH-1, FINCH-2). RCTs that compared TIMs with each other, cDMARD therapy, or placebo were included. Treatments included Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi), and other non-TNFi therapies. Efficacy was defined as achieving remission with a DAS28 score < 2.6 at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS In the 12-week analysis for the TIM-naïve/mixed population, all TIMs combined with cDMARD therapy were significantly more likely to achieve remission compared with a cDMARD alone, with intravenous tocilizumab showing a substantially greater magnitude of effect (odds ratio 19.36; 95% credible interval 11.01-38.16). Similarly, in the 24-week analysis, intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab showed the highest odds ratio of achieving DAS28 remission compared with cDMARD therapy. Similar trends were observed for the analyses on monotherapy or TIM-experienced population. CONCLUSIONS This NMA demonstrated that tocilizumab is associated with a greater likelihood of remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at 12 and 24 weeks compared with most other TIMs, including new JAK inhibitors, when used in combination with a cDMARD or as monotherapy among TIM-naïve/mixed or TIM-experienced populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yuting Kuang
- IQVIA, Inc., 135 Main Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Uyei
- IQVIA, Inc., 135 Main Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, USA
| | - Joseph Dang
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Is There a Symmetry in Disease Control and Quality of Life of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Biological Therapy? Symmetry (Basel) 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sym13040538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and compare the disease activity control and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with biological products in real-life settings. We tried to determine whether there is a symmetry in the performance of the biological molecules between each other and with the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. This is an observational, longitudinal, real-life study performed in the biggest rheumatology clinic during the period 2012–2020 comparing quality of life, cost of therapy, and disease control via different clinical measures. In all three disease activities measurement instruments, we observed an improvement for all biologic and target synthetic medicines. The disease activity score (DAS28) score decreased from 5.06 to 3.01, on average, for all INNs, suggesting that the majority of patients move away from moderate to low disease activity. The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score decreased from 25.9 to 9.4, also indicating that patients with moderate disease activity reached a low level of activity. Similar results are reflected in the score, which fell from 27.7 to 10.3, again confirming the improvement to a low level of disease activity for patients treated with all INNs. Logically, with the successful control of disease activity, the quality of life (QoL) of the observed patients improved from 0.77 to 0.83 after a one-year follow up, as measured with the EuroQuol 5D-3L (EQ5D). Based on these results, we can consider that the observed biological INNs perform symmetrically in terms of the control of disease activity and improvement in the QoL of the observed patients. Biological therapy improves the disease control and quality of life of suitable patients with RA in real-life settings. All available biological therapies could be used interchangeably.
Collapse
|
13
|
Weng C, Xue L, Wang Q, Lu W, Xu J, Liu Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X21999564. [PMID: 33815570 PMCID: PMC7989112 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x21999564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to April 2020. The active drugs included three JAK inhibitors and eight bDMARDs while the control drugs included placebo or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Outcomes include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using network meta-analysis with random effects. Results: Eighty-eight RCTs with 31,566 patients were included. All JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (ORs ranging between 3.05 and 5.61), DAS28 (WMDs ranging between −1.91 and −0.80) and HAQ-DI (WMDs ranging between −0.34 and −0.21). Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib showed relatively good efficacy in these three outcomes according to their relative ranking. Notably, tocilizumab was more effective than other active drugs in DAS28 (WMDs ranging between −1.11 and −0.49). Compared with the lower recommended doses, increasing the doses of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib 4 mg versus 2 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg versus 5 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg versus 15 mg) cannot provide significant additional benefits. In terms of discontinuations for AEs, all active drugs showed no significant difference compared with placebo except certolizumab pegol [OR 1.65, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.06–2.61] and rituximab (3.17, 1.11–10.80). Conclusions: Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib may have relatively good efficacy in patients with RA after treatment failure with csDMARDs. RA patients taking a JAK inhibitor may have a preference for a lower recommended dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenghua Weng
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Leixi Xue
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wentian Lu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiajun Xu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhichun Liu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Sanxiang Road No.1055, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tian X, Wang Q, Li M, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Huang C, Liu Y, Xu H, Chen Y, Wu L, Su Y, Xiao W, Zhang M, Zhao D, Sun L, Zuo X, Lei J, Li X, Zeng X. 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. RHEUMATOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2021; 2:1-14. [PMID: 36467901 PMCID: PMC9524773 DOI: 10.2478/rir-2021-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
A multidisciplinary guideline development group was established to formulate this evidence-based diagnosis and treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system was used to rate the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations, which were derived from research articles and guided by the analysis of the benefits and harms as well as patients' values and preferences. A total of 10 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of RA were developed. This new guideline covered the classification criteria, disease activity assessment and monitoring, and the role of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics, small molecule synthetic targeting drugs, and glucocorticoids in the treat-to-target approach of RA. This guideline is intended to serve as a tool for clinicians and patients to implement decision-making strategies and improve the practices of RA management in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinping Tian
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| | - Mengtao Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyi Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Cibo Huang
- Department of Rheumatology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Huji Xu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou University, Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lijun Wu
- Department of Rheumatology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Urumuqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Yin Su
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weiguo Xiao
- Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Miaojia Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing, JiangSu Province, China
| | - Dongbao Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University/Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linyun Sun
- Department of Rheumatology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
| | - Xiaoxia Zuo
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Rheumatic Diseases Research Center of Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Junqiang Lei
- Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xiaofeng Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zeng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Chinese Rheumatism Data Center (CRDC), Chinese SLE Treatment and Research Group (CSTAR), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sung YK, Lee YH. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther 2021; 46:984-992. [PMID: 33600008 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Both biologic and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapies have demonstrated substantial effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing inadequate responses to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors. METHODS A Bayesian network meta-analysis incorporating direct and indirect data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-TNF biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, salirumab and sirukumab) and JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) in patients with RA showing insufficient response to TNF inhibitors. RESULTS Nine RCTs, evaluating 3577 patients for 12 weeks fulfilled the inclusion requirements. JAK inhibitors and non-TNF biologics achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response relative to the placebo. The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) showed that JAK inhibitor treatment was most likely to achieve the highest ACR20 response rate, followed by non-TNF biologics and placebo. The ACR50 rate displayed similar patterns as the ACR20 response rate, but non-TNF biologics have a higher value than JAK inhibitors based on the ACR70 response rate. Adverse events did not reach statistical significance nor did serious adverse events when looking at safety over 12 weeks. The confidence intervals overlap, and there is no clinical significance to these safety data, even compared with placebo. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Both non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors have similar effects in patients with active RA that are refractory to anti-TNF treatment, and there were no differences with regard to safety among the treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ho Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Roodenrijs NMT, Hamar A, Kedves M, Nagy G, van Laar JM, van der Heijde D, Welsing PMJ. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2021; 7:e001512. [PMID: 33419871 PMCID: PMC7798678 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise, by a systematic literature review (SLR), the evidence regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA), informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of D2T RA. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to December 2019. Relevant papers were selected and appraised. RESULTS Two hundred seven (207) papers studied therapeutic strategies. Limited evidence was found on effective and safe disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with comorbidities and other contraindications that limit DMARD options (patients with obesity, hepatitis B and C, risk of venous thromboembolisms, pregnancy and lactation). In patients who previously failed biological (b-)DMARDs, all currently used b/targeted synthetic (ts-)DMARDs were found to be more effective than placebo. In patients who previously failed a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), there was a tendency of non-TNFi bDMARDs to be more effective than TNFis. Generally, effectiveness decreased in patients who previously failed a higher number of bDMARDs. Additionally, exercise, psychological, educational and self-management interventions were found to improve non-inflammatory complaints (mainly functional disability, pain, fatigue), education to improve goal setting, and self-management programmes, educational and psychological interventions to improve self-management.The identified evidence had several limitations: (1) no studies were found in patients with D2T RA specifically, (2) heterogeneous outcome criteria were used and (3) most studies had a moderate or high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS This SLR underscores the scarcity of high-quality evidence on the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of patients with D2T RA. Effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs decreased in RA patients who had failed a higher number of bDMARDs and a subsequent b/tsDMARD of a previously not targeted mechanism of action was somewhat more effective. Additionally, a beneficial effect of non-pharmacological interventions was found for improvement of non-inflammatory complaints, goal setting and self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia M T Roodenrijs
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Attila Hamar
- Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Melinda Kedves
- Rheumatology, Bacs-Kiskun Megyei Korhaz, Kecskemet, Hungary
| | - György Nagy
- Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology & Rheumatology & Clinical Rheumatology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jacob M van Laar
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Update on the Safety Profile of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis from Clinical Trials to Real-World Studies: A Narrative Review. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 8:17-40. [PMID: 33245555 PMCID: PMC7991042 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00258-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Tofacitinib is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adult patients who do not respond adequately or are intolerant to one or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The tofacitinib RA clinical development program included randomized controlled trials of 6–24-month duration and long-term extension studies with > 7061 patients and 22,875 patient-years of exposure. To date, there are no data from other randomized studies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors comparing the long-term safety of a JAK inhibitor versus an anti-TNF. Real-world studies are necessary to complete the body of evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of a therapeutic agent. In the case of tofacitinib, real-world data derive from health insurance claims databases, registries (US Corrona Registry, Swiss Registry, and others), national pharmacovigilance programs, and hospital databases (case series). The present article provides complete and up-to-date information on the safety profile of tofacitinib in RA, from clinical trials to real-world studies. Tofacitinib has demonstrated a consistent safety profile during up to 9.5 years of experience in randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies. Real-world evidence has not added new safety issues with respect to those found in the clinical program. In general, the safety profile of tofacitinib is consistent with that of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, with an increased risk of herpes zoster that seems to be a class effect of Janus kinase inhibitors. The continuous follow-up of therapeutic agents to treat rheumatoid arthritis is needed to adequately establish the safety profile for new mechanisms of action and potential risks associated with their longer term use.
Collapse
|
18
|
Leil TA, Lu Y, Bouillon-Pichault M, Wong R, Nowak M. Model-Based Meta-Analysis Compares DAS28 Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Effects and Suggests an Expedited Trial Design for Early Clinical Development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:517-527. [PMID: 32860421 PMCID: PMC7894503 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
A nonlinear mixed effects modeling approach was used to conduct a model‐based meta‐analysis (MBMA) of longitudinal, summary‐level, baseline‐corrected 28‐joint Disease Activity Score (ΔDAS28) clinical trial data from seven approved rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drugs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib), representing 130 randomized clinical trials in 27,355 patients. All of the drugs except tocilizumab were found to have relatively similar ΔDAS28 time courses and efficacy (baseline‐corrected and placebo‐corrected) at 24 weeks and beyond of approximately 0.87–1.3 units in the typical RA patient population. Tocilizumab was estimated to have a differentially greater response of 1.99 at 24 weeks, likely due to its disproportionate effect on the acute‐phase cytokine interleukin‐6. Baseline DAS28, disease duration, percentage of male participants, and the year of conduct of the trial were found to have statistically significant effects on the timing and/or magnitude of ΔDAS28 in the control arms. Clinical trial simulations using the present MBMA indicated that abatacept, certolizumab, etanercept, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib would be expected to have a greater than 70% probability of showing a statistically significant difference vs. control at Week 6 with a sample size of ~ 30 patients per arm. In future RA clinical trials, an interim analysis conducted as early as 6 weeks after treatment initiation, with relatively small sample sizes, should be sufficient to detect the ΔDAS28 treatment effect vs. placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek A Leil
- Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yasong Lu
- Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Robert Wong
- Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Miroslawa Nowak
- Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rogers DL, Ruiz JC, Baze WB, McClure GB, Smith C, Urbanowski R, Boston T, Simmons JH, Williams L, Abee CR, Vanchiere JA. Epidemiological and molecular characterization of a novel adenovirus of squirrel monkeys after fatal infection during immunosuppression. Microb Genom 2020; 6:mgen000395. [PMID: 32614763 PMCID: PMC7643968 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adenoviruses are a frequent cause of acute upper respiratory tract infections that can also cause disseminated disease in immunosuppressed patients. We identified a novel adenovirus, squirrel monkey adenovirus 1 (SqMAdV-1), as the cause of fatal infection in an immunocompromised squirrel monkey (Saimiri boliviensis) at the Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research (KCCMR). Sequencing of SqMAdV-1 revealed that it is most closely related (80.4 % pairwise nucleotide identity) to the titi monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus) adenovirus (TMAdV). Although identified in the titi monkey, TMAdV is highly lethal in these monkeys, and they are not thought to be the natural host. While SqMAdV-1 is similar to other primate adenoviruses in size and genomic characteristics, a nucleotide polymorphism at the expected stop codon of the DNA polymerase gene results in a 126 amino acid extension at the carboxy terminus, a feature not previously observed among other primate adenoviruses. PCR testing and partial sequencing of 95 archived faecal samples from other squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis and Saimiri sciureus) housed at the KCCMR revealed the presence of three distinct, and apparently endemic species of adenoviruses. A grouping of ten squirrel monkey adenovirus variants has high similarity to SqMAdV-1. A single adenovirus variant (designated SqMAdV-3), detected in five monkeys, has similarity to tufted capuchin (Sapajus apella) adenoviruses. The largest group of adenovirus variants detected (designated SqMAdV-2.0-2.16) has very high similarity (93-99 %) to the TMAdV, suggesting that squirrel monkeys may be the natural host of the TMAdV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna L. Rogers
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Julio C. Ruiz
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Wallace B. Baze
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Gloria B. McClure
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Carolyn Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Ricky Urbanowski
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Theresa Boston
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Joe H. Simmons
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Lawrence Williams
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Christian R. Abee
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - John A. Vanchiere
- Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine Research, Department of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ebina K, Hirano T, Maeda Y, Yamamoto W, Hashimoto M, Murata K, Takeuchi T, Shiba H, Son Y, Amuro H, Onishi A, Akashi K, Hara R, Katayama M, Yamamoto K, Kumanogoh A, Hirao M. Drug retention of 7 biologics and tofacitinib in biologics-naïve and biologics-switched patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:142. [PMID: 32539813 PMCID: PMC7296929 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This multi-center, retrospective study aimed to clarify retention rates and reasons for discontinuation of 7 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib (TOF), one of the janus kinase inhibitors, in bDMARDs-naïve and bDMARDs-switched patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods This study assessed 3897 patients and 4415 treatment courses with bDMARDs and TOF from 2001 to 2019 (2737 bDMARDs-naïve courses and 1678 bDMARDs-switched courses [59.5% of switched courses were their second agent], female 82.3%, baseline age 57.4 years, disease duration 8.5 years; rheumatoid factor positivity 78.4%; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate 4.3; concomitant prednisolone [PSL] dose 6.1 mg/day [usage 42.4%], and methotrexate [MTX] dose 8.5 mg/week [usage 60.9%]). Treatment courses included abatacept (ABT; n = 663), adalimumab (ADA; n = 536), certolizumab pegol (CZP; n = 226), etanercept (ETN; n = 856), golimumab (GLM; n = 458), infliximab (IFX; n = 724), tocilizumab (TCZ; n = 851), and TOF (n = 101/only bDMARDs-switched cases). Drug discontinuation reasons (categorized into lack of effectiveness, toxic adverse events, non-toxic reasons, or remission) and rates were estimated at 36 months using Gray’s test and statistically evaluated after adjusted by potential clinical confounders (age, sex, disease duration, concomitant PSL and MTX usage, starting date, and number of switched bDMARDs) using the Fine-Gray model. Results Cumulative incidence of drug discontinuation for each reason was as follows: lack of effectiveness in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 13.7% [ABT] to 26.9% [CZP]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 18.9% [TCZ] to 46.1% [CZP]; P < 0.001 between agents); toxic adverse events in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 4.6% [ABT] to 11.2% [ETN]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 5.0% [ETN] to 15.7% [TOF]; P = 0.004 between agents); and remission in the bDMARDs-naïve group (from 2.9% [ETN] to 10.0% [IFX]; P < 0.001 between agents) and the bDMARDs-switched group (from 1.1% [CZP] to 3.3% [GLM]; P = 0.9 between agents). Conclusions Remarkable differences were observed in drug retention of 7 bDMARDs and TOF between bDMARDs-naïve and bDMARDs-switched cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Ebina
- Department of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Toru Hirano
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichi Maeda
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Wataru Yamamoto
- Department of Health Information Management, Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Okayama, Japan.,Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Motomu Hashimoto
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Murata
- Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tohru Takeuchi
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiba
- Department of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yonsu Son
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Amuro
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Onishi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kengo Akashi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ryota Hara
- The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Masaki Katayama
- Department of Rheumatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Yamamoto
- Department of Medical Informatics, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kumanogoh
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Hirao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Monnet E, Choy EH, McInnes I, Kobakhidze T, de Graaf K, Jacqmin P, Lapeyre G, de Min C. Efficacy and safety of NI-0101, an anti-toll-like receptor 4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase II study. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:316-323. [PMID: 31892533 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) form immune complexes with citrullinated proteins binding toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, which has been proposed as a mediator of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). NI-0101 is a first-in-class humanised monoclonal antibody blocking TLR4, as confirmed by inhibition of in vivo lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine release in healthy volunteers. This study was design to confirm preclinical investigations supporting a biomarker-driven approach for treatment of patients with RA who present positive for these immune complexes. METHODS Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised (2:1) trial of the tolerability and efficacy of NI-0101 (5 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for 12 weeks) versus placebo in ACPA-positive RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate. Efficacy measures included Disease Activity Score (28-joint count) with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good and moderate responses, and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses. Subgroup analyses defined on biomarkers were conducted. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety were reported. RESULTS 90 patients were randomised (NI-0101 (61) and placebo (29)); 86 completed the study. No significant between-group difference was observed for any of the efficacy endpoints. Subgroup analyses using baseline parameters as covariants did not reveal any population responding to NI-0101. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 51.7% of patients who received placebo versus 52.5% for NI-0101. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate for the first time that in RA, a human immune-mediated inflammatory disease, blocking the TLR4 pathway alone does not improve disease parameters. Successful targeting of innate immune pathways in RA may require broader and/or earlier inhibitory approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Monnet
- Clinical Development, NovImmune SA, Plan les Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ernest H Choy
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Iain McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tamta Kobakhidze
- University Clinic, High Technology Medical Center, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Kathy de Graaf
- Clinical Development, NovImmune SA, Plan les Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Geneviève Lapeyre
- Clinical Development, NovImmune SA, Plan les Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cristina de Min
- Clinical Development, NovImmune SA, Plan les Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Andrès E, Lorenzo Villalba N, Zulfiqar AA, Serraj K, Gottenberg JE. Biotherapies-induced neutropenia in autoimmune and auto-inflammatory disorders and other orphan diseases. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/21678707.2019.1663172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Andrès
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Noel Lorenzo Villalba
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Abrar-Ahmad Zulfiqar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Khalid Serraj
- Departments of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Oujda, Oujda, Morocco
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Andrès E, Villalba NL, Zulfiqar AA, Serraj K, Mourot-Cottet R, Gottenberg AJE. State of Art of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Neutropenia or Agranulocytosis, with a Focus on Biotherapies. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E1351. [PMID: 31480527 PMCID: PMC6788182 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis is seldom discussed in the literature, especially for new drugs such as biotherapies outside the context of oncology. In the present paper, we report and discuss the clinical data and management of this relatively rare disorder, with a focus on biotherapies used in autoimmune and auto-inflammatory diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of the literature was carried out using the PubMed database of the US National Library of Medicine. We searched for articles published between January 2010 and May 2019 using the following key words or associations: "drug-induced neutropenia", "drug-induced agranulocytosis", and "idiosyncratic agranulocytosis". We included specific searches on several biotherapies used outside the context of oncology, including: tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors, anti-CD20 agents, anti-C52 agents, interleukin (IL) 6 inhibitors, IL 1 inhibitors, and B-cell activating factor inhibitor. RESULTS Idiosyncratic neutropenia remains a potentially serious adverse event due to the frequency of severe sepsis with severe deep tissue infections (e.g., pneumonia), septicemia, and septic shock in approximately two-thirds of all hospitalized patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count (NC) ≤ 0.5 × 109/L and ≤ 0.1 × 109/L, respectively). Over the last 20 years, several drugs have been strongly associated with the occurrence of idiosyncratic neutropenia, including antithyroid drugs, ticlopidine, clozapine, sulfasalazine, antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and deferiprone. Transient grade 1-2 neutropenia (absolute blood NC between 1.5 and 0.5 × 109/L) related to biotherapy is relatively common with these drugs. An approximate 10% prevalence of such neutropenia has been reported with several of these biotherapies (e.g., TNF-alpha inhibitors, IL6 inhibitors, and anti-CD52 agents). Grade 3-4 neutropenia or agranulocytosis and clinical manifestations related to sepsis are less common, with only a few case reports to date for most biotherapies. Special mention should be made of late onset and potentially severe neutropenia, especially following anti-CD52 agent therapy. During drug therapy, several prognostic factors have been identified that may be helpful when identifying 'susceptible' patients. Older age (>65 years), septicemia or shock, renal failure, and a neutrophil count ≤0.1 × 109/L have been identified as poor prognostic factors. Idiosyncratic neutropenia should be managed depending on clinical severity, with permanent/transient discontinuation or a lower dose of the drug, switching from one drug to another of the same or another class, broad-spectrum antibiotics in cases of sepsis, and hematopoietic growth factors (particularly G-CSF). CONCLUSION Significant progress has been made in recent years in the field of idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia, leading to an improvement in their prognosis (currently, mortality rate between 5 and 10%). Clinicians must continue their efforts to improve their knowledge of these adverse events with new drugs as biotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Andrès
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Noel Lorenzo Villalba
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Abrar-Ahmad Zulfiqar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Khalid Serraj
- Departments of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Oujda, 59000 Oujda, Morocco
| | - Rachel Mourot-Cottet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic B, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - And Jacques-Eric Gottenberg
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
- Referral Center of Immune Cytopenias, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Satış H, Can GE, Salman RB, Güler AA, Karadeniz H, Tufan A. Comment on: Comparative effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab and TNFi biologics in RA: results from the nationwide Swedish register. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:1509-1510. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Satış
- Faculty of Medicine Division of Rheumatology Internal Medicine Department
| | - Gülce Ecem Can
- Faculty of Medicine Intenal Medicine Deparment, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Hazan Karadeniz
- Faculty of Medicine Division of Rheumatology Internal Medicine Department
| | - Abdurrahman Tufan
- Faculty of Medicine Division of Rheumatology Internal Medicine Department
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ma K, Li L, Liu C, Zhou L, Zhou X. Efficacy and safety of various anti-rheumatic treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci 2019; 15:33-54. [PMID: 30697252 PMCID: PMC6348345 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.73714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biologics and traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are generally used in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous studies have presented abundant data and information about the efficacy of such treatments, but the results were incomplete and inconclusive. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of 15 therapies employing biologics and DMARDs for RA patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six outcomes (American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70, remission, adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)) were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different treatments. The node-splitting method was used to assess the inconsistency, and the rank probabilities of the therapies were estimated by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Besides, Jadad scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of eligible studies. RESULTS A total of 67 randomized controlled trials with 20,898 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most of the therapies presented better performance than conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and placebo in ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70. Conversely, the safety of cDMARDs and placebo seemed to be superior in AEs and SAEs. Also, tocilizumab (TCZ) and TCZ + methotrexate (MTX) showed better remission in pain compared to other treatments. Overall, certolizumab pegol (CZP) + MTX and TCZ + MTX had higher probability than the other treatments in efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We recommend CZP + MTX as the optimal drug therapy because it has the highest ranking in efficacy outcomes and relatively low risk of adverse events. TCZ + MTX is recommended as an alternative. Abatacept (ABT) and cDMARDs are not recommended due to their low efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kexun Ma
- The First Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Taizhou Hospital of TCM, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chunhui Liu
- The First Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lingling Zhou
- College of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xueping Zhou
- The First Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tonin FS, Steimbach LM, Leonart LP, Ferreira VL, Borba HH, Piazza T, Araújo AG, Fernandez-Llimos F, Pontarolo R, Wiens A. Discontinuation of non-anti-TNF drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in interventional versus observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 74:1513-1521. [PMID: 30022333 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-018-2524-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for the assessment of clinical outcomes, long-term extension trials (LTEs) and observational cohorts may help generate evidence. Our goal was to compare the discontinuation rates of abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported in different study designs. METHODS A systematic review was conducted with searches in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, plus a manual search, for RCTs, LTEs, and observational cohorts reporting discontinuation rates by any of three causes (all-cause, inefficacy, adverse events). Meta-analyses with sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions were conducted. RESULTS Of the 111 studies included, 74 were RCTs (n = 55) or LTEs (n = 17) reporting data on abatacept (n = 33), rituximab (n = 10), and tocilizumab (n = 31) and 37 were observational cohort studies (abatacept = 11, rituximab = 8, tocilizumab = 18). The follow-up duration did not differ among the study designs. Discontinuation rates were similar among the drugs but varied among the study designs. Discontinuation rates were significantly higher in cohort studies than those in interventional studies for the three drugs. Sensitivity analyses could not identify patient characteristics associated with these differences. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated no correlation between study follow-up duration and discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS The discontinuation rates reported for non-anti-TNF drugs varied relative to the study design in which they were investigated. Regulatory agencies, price-setting entities, and evidence-gathering researchers should consider the effect of the real-life environment in their decisions and conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Helena H Borba
- Department of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Thais Piazza
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Roberto Pontarolo
- Department of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Astrid Wiens
- Department of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mota LMHD, Kakehasi AM, Gomides APM, Duarte ALBP, Cruz BA, Brenol CV, de Albuquerque CP, Castelar Pinheiro GDR, Laurindo IMM, Pereira IA, Bertolo MB, Ubirajara Silva de Souza MPG, de Freitas MVC, Louzada-Júnior P, Xavier RM, Giorgi RDN. 2017 recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Rheumatol 2018; 58:2. [PMID: 30657071 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-018-0005-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this document is to provide a comprehensive update of the recommendations of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology on drug treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on a systematic literature review and on the opinion of a panel of rheumatologists. Four general principles and eleven recommendations were approved. General principles: RA treatment should (1) preferably consist of a multidisciplinary approach coordinated by a rheumatologist, (2) include counseling on lifestyle habits, strict control of comorbidities, and updates of the vaccination record, (3) be based on decisions shared by the patient and the physician after clarification about the disease and the available therapeutic options; (4) the goal is sustained clinical remission or, when this is not feasible, low disease activity. Recommendations: (1) the first line of treatment should be a csDMARD, started as soon as the diagnosis of RA is established; (2) methotrexate (MTX) is the first-choice csDMARD; (3) the combination of two or more csDMARDs, including MTX, may be used as the first line of treatment; (4) after failure of first-line therapy with MTX, the therapeutic strategies include combining MTX with another csDMARD (leflunomide), with two csDMARDs (hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine), or switching MTX for another csDMARD (leflunomide or sulfasalazine) alone; (5) after failure of two schemes with csDMARDs, a bDMARD may be preferably used or, alternatively a tsDMARD, preferably combined, in both cases, with a csDMARD; (6) the different bDMARDs in combination with MTX have similar efficacy, and therefore, the therapeutic choice should take into account the peculiarities of each drug in terms of safety and cost; (7) the combination of a bDMARD and MTX is preferred over the use of a bDMARD alone; (8) in case of failure of an initial treatment scheme with a bDMARD, a scheme with another bDMARD can be used; in cases of failure with a TNFi, a second bDMARD of the same class or with another mechanism of action is effective and safe; (9) tofacitinib can be used to treat RA after failure of bDMARD; (10) corticosteroids, preferably at low doses for the shortest possible time, should be considered during periods of disease activity, and the risk-benefit ratio should also be considered; (11) reducing or spacing out bDMARD doses is possible in patients in sustained remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licia Maria Henrique da Mota
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina- Universidade de Brasília; Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. .,Rheos, Centro Médico Lúcio Costa, SGAS 610, bloco 1, salas T50- T51, L2 Sul, Asa Sul, Brasília, DF, 70200700, Brazil.
| | - Adriana Maria Kakehasi
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Monteiro Gomides
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina- Universidade de Brasília; Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.,Centro Universitário de Brasília- UniCEUB, Brasília, Brazil
| | | | | | - Claiton Viegas Brenol
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Manoel Barros Bertolo
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | | | | | - Paulo Louzada-Júnior
- Disciplina de Reumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Machado Xavier
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Rina Dalva Neubarth Giorgi
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cai W, Gu Y, Cui H, Cao Y, Wang X, Yao Y, Wang M. The Efficacy and Safety of Mainstream Medications for Patients With cDMARD-Naïve Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9:138. [PMID: 29618976 PMCID: PMC5871709 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The mainstream medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), which mostly are methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents such as adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab (CZP), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and tocilizumab (TCZ). This network meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the medications above and interventions combining cDMARDs and biologic agents for patients with RA. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes concerning efficacy and safety were evaluated utilizing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). The outcomes of efficacy would be evaluated through remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) scores. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment on each index. Results: A total of 20 RCTs with 9,047 patients were included, and the efficacy and safety of the concerning interventions for RA were evaluated. Compared with cDMARDs alone, TCZ+MTX, ETN+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and ADA+MTX showed significant statistical advantage on ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70. Apart from that, as for remission, TCZ+MTX, IFX+MTX, TCZ, and CZP+MTX performed better compared to cDMARDs alone. The SUCRA ranking also indicated that TCZ+MTX was the intervention with best ranking in the entire four efficacy indexes followed by ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX. However, there was no obvious difference among these medications compared with cDMARDs when it comes to safety, which need more specific studies on that. Conclusion: TCZ+MTX was potentially the most recommended combination of medications for RA due to its good performance in all outcomes of efficacy. ETX+MTX and IFX+MTX, which also performed well, could be introduced as alternative treatments. However, considering the adverse events, the treatments concerning should be introduced with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyan Cai
- Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Youyi Gu
- Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Huanqin Cui
- Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Yinyin Cao
- Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Xiaoliang Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Yi Yao
- Department of Pediatrics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Mingyu Wang
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao Medical College of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boyce EG, Rogan EL, Vyas D, Prasad N, Mai Y. Sarilumab: Review of a Second IL-6 Receptor Antagonist Indicated for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Pharmacother 2018; 52:780-791. [DOI: 10.1177/1060028018761599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Major Objectives: To review the efficacy, safety, and economics of sarilumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data Sources: PubMed (1966 to January 2018), Clinicaltrials.gov (January 2018), and Scopus (1970 to January 2018) were searched using sarilumab, Kevzara, REGN88, and SAR153191. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Human studies published in peer-reviewed publications in English were the primary sources for efficacy and safety. Data Synthesis: Data from randomized, double-blind, controlled, published clinical studies weeks demonstrated statistically significantly higher American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) remission response rates and improvements in DAS28 and Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index scores for sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy (P < 0.05) and for sarilumab versus placebo in patients receiving methotrexate or other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs); P < 0.05. The ACR20 and ACR50 response rates were, respectively, 56-72% and 35-46% for sarilumab, 58% and 30% for adalimumab, and 33-34% and 15-18% for placebo. DAS28 remission rates were 20-34% for sarilumab, 7% for adalimumab, and 7-10% for placebo. Sarilumab has a higher risk for neutropenia than tocilizumab, the other IL-6 inhibitor, but a lower risk for dyslipidemia, injection site reactions, and gastrointestinal perforation. The acquisition costs of sarilumab are expected to be similar to those of most other biologic DMARDs. Conclusion: Sarilumab is an alternative to biologic DMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs in patients with moderate to severely active RA who have not responded adequately to prior conventional synthetic DMARDs or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deepti Vyas
- University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA
| | - Neel Prasad
- University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA
| | - Yvonne Mai
- University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hall V, Johnson D, Torresi J. Travel and biologic therapy: travel-related infection risk, vaccine response and recommendations. J Travel Med 2018; 25:4934912. [PMID: 29635641 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/tay018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic therapy has revolutionized the management of refractory chronic autoimmune and auto-inflammatory disease, as well as several malignancies, providing rapid symptomatic relief and/or disease remission. Patients receiving biologic therapies have an improved quality of life, facilitating travel to exotic destinations and potentially placing them at risk of a range of infections. For each biologic agent, we review associated travel-related infection risk and expected travel vaccine response and effectiveness. METHODS A PUBMED search [vaccination OR vaccine] AND/OR ['specific vaccine'] AND/OR [immunology OR immune response OR response] AND [biologic OR biological OR biologic agent] was performed. A review of the literature was performed in order to develop recommendations on vaccination for patients in receipt of biologic therapy travelling to high-risk travel destinations. RESULTS There is a paucity of literature in this area, however, it is apparent that travel-related infection risk is increased in patients on biologic therapy and when illness occurs they are at a higher risk of complication and hospitalization. Patients in receipt of biologic agents are deemed as having a high level of immunosuppression-live vaccines, including the yellow fever vaccine, are contraindicated. Inactivated vaccines are considered safe; however, vaccine response can be attenuated by the patient's biologic therapy, thereby resulting in reduced vaccine effectiveness and protection. CONCLUSIONS Best practice requires a collaborative approach between the patient's primary healthcare physician, relevant specialist and travel medicine expert, who should all be familiar with the immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory effects resulting from the biologic therapies. Timing of vaccines should be carefully planned, and if possible, vaccination provided well before established immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Hall
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Douglas Johnson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Department of General Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Torresi
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Eastern Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, Knox Private Hospital, Boronia, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Factors influencing the choice of first- and second-line biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from the Italian LORHEN Registry. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 36:753-761. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-016-3528-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Revised: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|