1
|
Rajj R, Schaadt N, Bezsila K, Balázs O, Jancsó MB, Auer M, Kiss DB, Fittler A, Somogyi-Végh A, Télessy IG, Botz L, Vida RG. Survey of Potential Drug Interactions, Use of Non-Medical Health Products, and Immunization Status among Patients Receiving Targeted Therapies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:942. [PMID: 39065792 PMCID: PMC11279607 DOI: 10.3390/ph17070942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent years, several changes have occurred in the management of chronic immunological conditions with the emerging use of targeted therapies. This two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted through structured in-person interviews in 2018-2019 and 2022. Additional data sources included ambulatory medical records and the itemized reimbursement reporting interface of the National Health Insurance Fund. Drug interactions were analyzed using the UpToDate Lexicomp, Medscape drug interaction checker, and Drugs.com databases. The chi-square test was used, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. In total, 185 patients participated. In 53% of patients (n = 53), a serious drug-drug interaction (DDI) was identified (mean number: 1.07 ± 1.43, 0-7), whereas this value was 38% (n = 38) for potential drug-supplement interactions (mean number: 0.58 ± 0.85, 0-3) and 47% (n = 47) for potential targeted drug interactions (0.72 ± 0.97, 0-5) in 2018. In 2022, 78% of patients (n = 66) were identified as having a serious DDI (mean number: 2.27 ± 2.69, 0-19), 66% (n = 56) had a potential drug-supplement interaction (mean number: 2.33 ± 2.69, 0-13), and 79% (n = 67) had a potential targeted drug interactions (1.35 ± 1.04, 0-5). Older age (>60 years; OR: 2.062), female sex (OR: 3.387), and polypharmacy (OR: 5.276) were identified as the main risk factors. Screening methods and drug interaction databases do not keep pace with the emergence of new therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Réka Rajj
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Nóra Schaadt
- Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Katalin Bezsila
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Orsolya Balázs
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Marcell B. Jancsó
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Milán Auer
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Dániel B. Kiss
- Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - András Fittler
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Anna Somogyi-Végh
- Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - István G. Télessy
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| | - Lajos Botz
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
- Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Róbert Gy. Vida
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary (A.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abud-Mendoza C, Aceves-Ávila FJ, Arce-Salinas CA, Álvarez Nemegyei J, Barile-Fabris L, Durán-Barragán S, Flores-Alvarado DE, Hernández-Núñez E, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Moctezuma-Ríos JF, Pascual-Ramos V, Portela-Hernández M, Silveira LH, Andrade-Ortega L, Barrera-Vargas A, Carrillo-Vázquez S, Castro-Colin Z, Cuevas-Orta E, Flores-Suárez LF, Guaracha-Basáñez GA, Hernández-Cabrera MF, de Jesús Hernández-Galarza I, Herrera-vanOostdam DA, Lobato-Belmonte AC, Martínez-Martínez LA, Martínez-Martínez MU, Medrano-Ramírez G, Merayo-Chalico FJ, Meza-López Y Olguín G, Olan F, Peña-Santos G, Ramos-Remus C, Reyes-Cordero G, Rivera-Terán V, Rojas-Serrano J, Serna-Peña G, Sicsik-Ayala S, Sifuentes-Cantú CA, Vega-Morales D, Villaseñor-Ovies P, Xibillé-Friedmann D, Pacheco-Tena C. Update of the guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the Mexican College of Rheumatology 2023. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA 2024; 20:263-280. [PMID: 38796394 DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS A group of experts representative of different geographical regions and various medical services catering to the Mexican population with RA was formed. Questions based on Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) were developed, deemed clinically relevant. These questions were answered based on the results of a recent systematic literature review (SLR), and the evidence's validity was assessed using the GRADE system, considered a standard for these purposes. Subsequently, the expert group reached consensus on the direction and strength of recommendations through a multi-stage voting process. RESULTS The updated guidelines for RA treatment stratify various therapeutic options, including different classes of DMARDs (conventional, biologicals, and JAK inhibitors), as well as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and analgesics. By consensus, it establishes the use of these in different subpopulations of interest among RA patients and addresses aspects related to vaccination, COVID-19, surgery, pregnancy and lactation, and others. CONCLUSIONS This update of the Mexican guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of RA provides reference points for evidence-based decision-making, recommending patient participation in joint decision-making to achieve the greatest benefit for our patients. It also establishes recommendations for managing a variety of relevant conditions affecting our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Abud-Mendoza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Sergio Durán-Barragán
- Departamento de Clínicas Médicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Diana Elsa Flores-Alvarado
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Virginia Pascual-Ramos
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Margarita Portela-Hernández
- Departamento de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Humberto Silveira
- Departamento de Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lilia Andrade-Ortega
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico; Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital CMN 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ana Barrera-Vargas
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sandra Carrillo-Vázquez
- Hospital Regional 1.◦ de Octubre, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Zully Castro-Colin
- Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional La Raza «Antonio Fraga Mouret», IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Enrique Cuevas-Orta
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | - Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
- Clínica de Vasculitis Sistémicas Primarias, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Iván de Jesús Hernández-Galarza
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - David Alejandro Herrera-vanOostdam
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Ignacio Morones Prieto, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Francisco Javier Merayo-Chalico
- Departamento de Inmunología y Reumatología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Francisco Olan
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Dr. Gustavo A. Rovirosa Pérez, Villa Hermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
| | | | - César Ramos-Remus
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, S.C. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Greta Reyes-Cordero
- Hospital Angeles Chihuahua, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
| | - Vijaya Rivera-Terán
- Registro Mexicano de Acotamientos Adversos de Terapias Biológicas en Enfermedades Reumatológicas (Biobadamex), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Griselda Serna-Peña
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Sandra Sicsik-Ayala
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
| | | | - David Vega-Morales
- Reumatología y Centro de Infusión, Hospital General de Zona No. 17, IMSS, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Pablo Villaseñor-Ovies
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital General de Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
| | | | - César Pacheco-Tena
- Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wroński J, Palej K, Stańczyk S, Łosoś M, Werońska-Tatara J, Stasiek M, Wysmołek M, Olech A, Felis-Giemza A. Do Not Leave Your Patients in the Dark-Using American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Recommendations for Vaccination in Polish Adult Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1854. [PMID: 38140256 PMCID: PMC10748174 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Introduction: Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) face a higher infectious risk compared to the general population. As per the ACR and EULAR recommendations, vaccinations against influenza, COVID-19, pneumococci, and tetanus are recommended for most patients with AIIRD. (2) Objectives: This study aimed to assess vaccination coverage among Polish AIIRD patients and identify factors influencing it. (3) Patients and Methods: This study was conducted at the reference rheumatological center in Poland between May 2023 and October 2023. The study participants completed a questionnaire covering their knowledge of vaccination recommendations, actual vaccination status, factors affecting their decision to vaccinate, and their perspectives on immunization. (4) Results: This study involved 300 AIIRD patients and 60 controls. Both groups exhibited comparably low vaccination rates for all diseases (the highest for COVID-19-52% in both groups and the lowest for pneumococci-7.7% and 10%, respectively). Knowledge about recommended vaccinations was limited among patients in both groups. AIIRD patients were also not aware that they should avoid live vaccines. The primary motivators for vaccination among AIIRD patients were fear of infection (up to 75%) and medical advice (up to 74.6%). Conversely, the predominant reasons for non-vaccination were a lack of knowledge that vaccination is recommended (up to 74.7%) and concerns about potential adverse effects (up to 48.6%). Many patients reported not receiving vaccination recommendations from either primary care physicians or rheumatologists. (5) Conclusions: To enhance vaccination coverage among AIIRD patients in Poland, it is essential to educate them about vaccinations during routine medical consultations, emphasizing the increased risk of infection, informing them about recommended vaccinations, and clarifying doubts about adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Wroński
- Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Spartańska 1, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Karolina Palej
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Sandra Stańczyk
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Marta Łosoś
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Joanna Werońska-Tatara
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Małgorzata Stasiek
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Marta Wysmołek
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| | - Agnieszka Olech
- Department of Rheumatology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Spartańska 1, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Anna Felis-Giemza
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 02-637 Warsaw, Poland; (K.P.); (S.S.); (M.Ł.); (J.W.-T.); (M.S.); (M.W.); (A.F.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Banerjee P, Preissner S, Preissner R. Using real-world evidence data and digital monitoring to analyze the hepatotoxic profiles of biologics across more than two million patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:10878. [PMID: 37407661 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37979-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The real-world evidence data from multiple sources which includes information on patient health status and medical behavior in routine clinical setup can give deeper insights into drugs 'safety and efficacy. The RWE-based analysis in this study revealed a statistically significant link between biologics usage and hepatotoxicity in patients. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to conduct a large-scale multi-cohort analysis on the hepatotoxic profiles of biologics. Biologics are among the most prescribed medicines for several chronic inflammatory diseases. These agents target critical pathogenic pathways, but they may also have serious side effects. It is important to analyze whether biologics agents are an added concern or therapeutic opportunity. Real-world evidence (RWE) data were extracted for patients using biologics to monitor the safety and effectiveness of the biologics. All six biologics included in this analysis-are mostly highly prescribed biologics. The aim of the study was to assess the hepatotoxic profiles of subjects using different biologics. We evaluated the safety of current treatment regimens for patients in a large real-world cohort from multiple health care centers. Total number of eligible patients retrieved from the database is 38,112,285. Of these 38 million patients, 2.3 million take biologics. The primary objective was to assess the potential adverse hepatotoxic effects of the six biologics; adalimumab, trastuzumab, prevnar13, pegfilgrastim, interferon-beta1a and insulin glargine across different indications like diabetes mellitus, encounter for immunization, malignant neoplasm of breast, multiple sclerosis, malignant neoplasm of kidney, aplastic anaemias, radiation sickness, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, spondylopathies. Data from patients using the six most-used biologics-adalimumab, trastuzumab, prevnar13, pegfilgrastim, interferon-beta1a and insulin glargine were retrieved from a global research network covering 250 million patients' data from 19 countries, and assigned to the cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The cohorts were propensity score matched for age and sex. After defining the primary outcome as "hepatotoxicity" (endpoint defined as ICD-10 code: K71 (hepatotoxic liver disease), a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and risk ratios (RR), odds ratios (OR), and hazard ratios (HR) were determined. A total number of 2,312,655 subjects were eligible who take biologics, and after matching total cohorts accounted for 2,303,445. We have considered the clinical data as a 1:1 matched-study design, using propensity score-matched sub-cohorts to better control for confounding associations that might stem from different distributions of age and gender between the whole dataset and the subset of patients. We discovered evidence supporting the hepatotoxic-causing effect of biologic drugs: (i) all biologics considered together had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.67-2.35), with (ii) Adalimumab 1.9 (95% CI, 1.72-2.20), Trastuzumab 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.3), Prevnar13 2.3 (95% CI, 2.16-2.60), Pegfilgrastim 2.3 (95% CI, 2.0-2.50), Interferon-Beta1a 1.7 (95% CI, 1.18-2.51), and Insulin glargine 1.9 (95% CI, 1.8-1.99). Our findings indicate that clinicians should consider evaluating hepatic profiles of patients undergoing treatment with biologic drugs and counsel them regarding the risk of developing hepatic injury. Strengths of the study includes a large sample size and robust statistical techniques. Limitations of this study include lack of detailed information regarding clinical severity. Major biologics are associated with hepatotoxicity. We discovered evidence supporting the hepatotoxicity-causing effects of biologics: all biologics considered together had an OR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.67-2.35).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Banerjee
- Institute for Physiology and Science-IT, Charite, University Medicine Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Saskia Preissner
- Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Preissner
- Institute for Physiology and Science-IT, Charite, University Medicine Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Te Linde E, Doornekamp L, Daenen KCP, van Gorp ECM, Bruns AHW. Dutch Healthcare Professionals' Opinion on the Allocation of Responsibilities concerning Prescribing and Administering Medically Indicated Vaccines to Immunocompromised Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030686. [PMID: 36992271 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific vaccines are indicated for immunocompromised patients (ICPs) due to their vulnerability to infections. Recommendation of these vaccines by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is a crucial facilitator for vaccine uptake. Unfortunately, the responsibilities to recommend and administer these vaccines are not clearly allocated among HCPs involved in the care of adult ICPs. We aimed to evaluate HCPs' opinions on directorship and their role in facilitating the uptake of medically indicated vaccines as a basis to improve vaccination practices. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was performed among in-hospital medical specialists (MSs), general practitioners (GPs), and public health specialists (PHSs) in the Netherlands to assess their opinion on directorship and the implementation of vaccination care. Additionally, perceived barriers, facilitators, and possible solutions to improve vaccine uptake were investigated. RESULTS In total, 306 HCPs completed the survey. HCPs almost unanimously (98%) reported that according to them, the primary treating physician is responsible for recommending medically indicated vaccines. Administering these vaccines was seen as a more shared responsibility. The most important barriers experienced by HCPs in recommending and administering were reimbursement problems, a lack of a national vaccination registration system, insufficient collaboration among HCPs, and logistical problems. MSs, GPs and PHSs all mentioned the same three solutions as important strategies to improve vaccination practices, i.e., reimbursement of vaccines, reliable and easily accessible registration of received vaccines, and arrangements for collaboration among the different HCPs that are involved in care. CONCLUSION The improvement in vaccination practices in ICPs should focus on better collaboration among MSs, GPs, and PHSs, who should know each other's expertise; clear agreement on responsibility; reimbursement for vaccines; and the availability of clear registration of vaccination history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsemieke Te Linde
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Doornekamp
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrijn C P Daenen
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric C M van Gorp
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke H W Bruns
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neusser S, Neumann A, zur Nieden P, Speckemeier C, Schlierenkamp S, Walendzik A, Karbach U, Andreica I, Vaupel K, Baraliakos X, Kiltz U. Facilitators and barriers of vaccine uptake in patients with autoimune inflammatory rheumatic disease: a scoping review. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002562. [PMID: 36562767 PMCID: PMC9748992 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) often have lower vaccination coverage rates compared with the general population, despite being disproportionately affected by infectious complications. We aim to systematically review the literature regarding vaccination willingness and hesitancy in AIRD. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in June 2021. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a standardised form. Risk of bias was assessed using instruments from McMaster University. Identified barriers were categorised into the WHO's measuring behavioural and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination conceptual model. RESULTS The search yielded 1644 hits of which 30 publications were included (cross-sectional studies based on interviews (n=27) and intervention studies (n=3)). The majority of studies reported barriers to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination only (n=9) or in combination with another vaccination (n=8) from the patients' perspective. Only one study assessed the view of rheumatologists. Coverage of domains matched to the BeSD model suggests a lack of awareness of infection risk by both patients and physicians. Patients mainly mentioned behavioural and social factors that negatively influenced their willingness to be vaccinated while physicians mentioned organisational deficits as major barriers. CONCLUSIONS The view on vaccination in patients with AIRD diverges between patients and rheumatologists. Our results show that in-depth counselling on vaccines is important for patients, whereas physicians need support in implementing specific immunisation recommendations. The themes identified provide a starting point for future interventions to improve vaccine rates in patients with AIRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Neusser
- Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement, Essen, Germany
| | - Anja Neumann
- Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Anke Walendzik
- Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement, Essen, Germany
| | - Ute Karbach
- Institute for Medical Sociology Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ioana Andreica
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany,Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Kristina Vaupel
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany,Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Uta Kiltz
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany,Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nakamura H, Nagasawa Y, Kobayashi H, Tsukamoto M, Takayama T, Kitamura N. Successful Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-related Activation of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Positive Findings for Epstein-Barr Virus. Intern Med 2022; 61:2073-2076. [PMID: 35466171 PMCID: PMC9334251 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9433-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
We herein report a 60-year-old woman who experienced severe flare of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity following administration of the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Since 40 years old, she had been in long-term remission of anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive RA. Ten days after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, she presented with a high fever and polyarthritis, active synovitis on joint ultrasound, a clinical disease activity index of 35, and positivity for anti-early antigen, diffuse type and restricted type (EA DR) IgG and EBV deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV-DNA). Tocilizumab was introduced to treat RA. The RA disease activity disappeared, and anti-EA DR IgG and EBV-DNA became negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Nakamura
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nagasawa
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Hitomi Kobayashi
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masako Tsukamoto
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tadateru Takayama
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Noboru Kitamura
- Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Low Pneumococcal Vaccination among Patients with Psoriasis in Germany: Results from Vac-Pso. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10071005. [PMID: 35891172 PMCID: PMC9315583 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
While suboptimal pneumococcal vaccination rates have been reported in immunosuppressed patients with rheumatic diseases, data for patients with psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD) are scarce. Pneumococcal vaccination in Germany is recommended in patients with certain comorbidities, immunosuppression, and/or aged 60 years or above. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to investigate the pneumococcal vaccination rate in patients with PsO compared to patients with AD and to evaluate patient perceptions. All patients completed a questionnaire on vaccination status and perceptions, patient and disease characteristics, as well as comorbidity. Medical records and vaccination certificates were reviewed. Over the whole cohort (n = 327 PsO (41.9% female), n = 98 AD (42.9% female)), 83.8% and 42.9% of PsO and AD patients, respectively, had an indication for pneumococcal vaccination due to immunosuppressive treatment. The pneumococcal vaccination rate was 14.4% and 10.2% in PsO and AD patients, respectively. The vaccination rate depended significantly on age, working status and presence of psoriatic arthritis. The most common reason for nonvaccination was lacking recommendation by physicians. Higher awareness, particularly for vaccination indication due to immunosuppression among dermatologists, general physicians, and patients, is warranted.
Collapse
|
9
|
Influenza Vaccination in Psoriatic Patients-Epidemiology and Patient Perceptions: A German Multicenter Study (Vac-Pso). Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9080843. [PMID: 34451968 PMCID: PMC8402561 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9080843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The risk of developing severe complications from an influenza virus infection is increased in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis (PsO) and atopic dermatitis (AD). However, low influenza vaccination rates have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine vaccination rates in PsO compared to AD patients and explore patient perceptions of vaccination. A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in 327 and 98 adult patients with PsO and AD, respectively. Data on vaccination, patient and disease characteristics, comorbidity, and patient perceptions was collected with a questionnaire. Medical records and vaccination certificates were reviewed. A total of 49.8% of PsO and 32.7% of AD patients were vaccinated at some point, while in season 2018/2019, 30.9% and 13.3% received an influenza vaccination, respectively. There were 96.6% and 77.6% of PsO and AD patients who had an indication for influenza vaccination due to age, immunosuppressive therapy, comorbidity, occupation, and/or pregnancy. Multivariate regression analysis revealed higher age (p < 0.001) and a history of bronchitis (p = 0.023) as significant predictors of influenza vaccination in PsO patients. Considering that most patients had an indication for influenza vaccination, the rate of vaccinated patients was inadequately low.
Collapse
|
10
|
Potera J, Kambhatla S, Gauto-Mariotti E, Manadan A. Incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for potentially preventable infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40:4845-4851. [PMID: 34254210 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05836-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have high infection rates. Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster (HZV), and influenza are common and potentially preventable causes of morbidity and mortality. Vaccinations have been shown to reduce the rates of these infections. In this study, we aim to determine incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for Streptococcus pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections in patients with RA. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the adult RA hospitalizations in 2016 from the National Inpatient Sample database. We limited the RA cases to hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of S. pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections. The total number of discharges, age, length of stay, mortality, and hospital charges were recorded. RESULTS In 2016, 552,230 adult hospitalizations had either a primary or secondary diagnosis of RA. Among this group, there were 1120 hospitalizations for influenza, 590 hospitalizations for herpes zoster, and 785 hospitalizations for S. pneumoniae. These infections constituted 0.5% of RA hospitalizations and were a more common cause of hospitalizations when compared to non-RA hospitalizations. Aggregate annual national hospital charges reached $124 million and an aggregate annual LOS of 13,750 days. CONCLUSION Infections, such as influenza, HZV, and S. pneumoniae, remain a common cause of inpatient morbidity and mortality among RA patients. Additionally, the economic burden of these infections is significant. Universal vaccination programs in RA patients, as well as other interventions aiming to improve quality of care of this susceptible population, should be further studied to reduce hospitalizations, cost, morbidity, and mortality. Key Points • Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster, and influenza infections remain an important preventable cause of hospitalizations among RA patients and carry significant economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Potera
- Internal Medicine Department, John H Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1950 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Soumyasri Kambhatla
- Division of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 510, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Estefania Gauto-Mariotti
- Internal Medicine Department, John H Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1950 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Augustine Manadan
- Division of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 510, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|