1
|
Fan C, Wang X, Zheng X, Sun Y, Ye K, Jiang Y, Liu X, Xu W, Liu Y, Yang Y, Liu J, Jiang Q, He C, Wu X, Nie X, Zhang J, Tan B, Wang W, Zhang Y, Feng Z, Yang C, Lu Y, Liu H, Chen X, Xu J, Liu F, Zheng X, Wang J, Wu S, Chen G, Zhang Y, Jin L, Ge H. Consolidation chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter non-inferiority phase III randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:321. [PMID: 38454345 PMCID: PMC10921589 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12002-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) is the gold standard for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the potential benefits of consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT in patients with esophageal cancer remain debatable. Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of dCCRT with or without consolidation chemotherapy in patients with ESCC are lacking. In this study, we aim to generate evidence regarding consolidation chemotherapy efficacy in patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC. METHODS This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase-III randomized controlled trial comparing non-inferiority of dCCRT alone to consolidation chemotherapy following dCCRT. In total, 600 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT (Arm A) or dCCRT alone (Arm B). Overall survival will be the primary endpoint, whereas progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and treatment-related toxicity will be the secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION This study aid in further understanding the effects of consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT in patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR1800017646.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengcheng Fan
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xu Wang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xiaoli Zheng
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yanan Sun
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Ke Ye
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Wencai Xu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yuanyuan Yang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Jinsong Liu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Qiong Jiang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Chunyu He
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Wu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xin Nie
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Jingwei Zhang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Bo Tan
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Wen Wang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yougai Zhang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Zhuo Feng
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Chengliang Yang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Yufei Lu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Hailong Liu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xijuan Chen
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Jing Xu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Fang Liu
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Xuefeng Zheng
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Shang Wu
- Xinyang Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University & Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, 464000, China
| | - Guofu Chen
- Xinyang Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University & Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang, 464000, China
| | | | - Linzhi Jin
- Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Hong Ge
- The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ou Y, Li H, Yang D, Suo L. Effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Adv Med Sci 2024; 69:125-131. [PMID: 38438081 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We explored the efficacy and influencing factors of chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 226 locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyse the impact of relevant factors. The endpoint was overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS Compared with the radiotherapy group, the chemoradiotherapy group had a significant difference in the overall survival rate and the progression-free survival rate between 3 and 5 years (both p < 0.05). The incidences of radiation pneumonitis and radiation oesophagitis were analysed, and the differences were not significant (all p > 0.05). The incidence of haematological toxicity in the chemoradiotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of haematological toxicity between the ≤65 and the >65 age groups (p < 0.05). Tumour location, T stage, tumour length, tumour target volume, and short-term curative effect were the main factors affecting the prognosis (all p < 0.05). T stage, gross tumour volume, and short-term curative effect were all independent factors affecting the prognosis (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with chemotherapy had significant survival benefits compared with radiotherapy alone. Haematological toxicity was the main adverse reaction. T-stage, gross tumour volume and short-term curative effect were independent factors influencing the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Ou
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Tumor Hospital (Changzhou Fourth People's Hospital), Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Hongbo Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Tumor Hospital (Changzhou Fourth People's Hospital), Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Dan Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Changzhou Tumor Hospital (Changzhou Fourth People's Hospital), Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lijun Suo
- Quality Management Office, Changzhou Tumor Hospital (Changzhou Fourth People's Hospital), Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han LQ, Cui TT, Xiao NJ, Li W. Prognostic analysis and treatment utilization of different treatment strategies in elderly esophageal cancer patients with distant metastases: a SEER database analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:15413-15423. [PMID: 37644234 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to explore which therapeutic strategy is more beneficial for elderly esophageal cancer (EC) patients with distant metastasis, the treatment utilization status and the screening of factors related to prognosis, so as to better guide the treatment of these patients. METHODS Patients in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were divided into chemoradiotherapy (Group A), chemotherapy (Group B), radiotherapy (Group C), and no treatment (Group D) according to different treatment methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 7027 patients were included in this study, 5739 males (81.7%) and 1288 females (18.3%) with the median age was 70 (60-98). In the original cohort, the number of patients in the four groups was 2260 (Group A), 2087 (Group B), 945 (Group C) and 1735 (Group D), respectively. After PSM, there was no significant difference in mean OS (A vs B, 13.5 months VS 13.4 months, P = 0.511) and mean ECSS (A vs B, 15.6 vs 15.5 months, P = 0.374), while both OS (B vs C, 7 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) and ECSS (B vs C, 8 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) of chemotherapy alone were significantly better than those of radiotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis of patients older than 80 years showed that the median OS (A vs B, 7 vs 6 months) and median ECSS (A vs B, 8 vs 7 months) of Group A were significantly better than those of Group B (P < 0.05). In addition, all patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set with a ratio of 7:3. Based on the independent risk factors for OS, a nomogram model was constructed and validated. CONCLUSION For elderly EC patients with distant metastasis, aggressive treatment was still necessary after a comprehensive assessment of the patient's physical condition, especially for patients over 80 years old, and chemoradiotherapy maybe still the first choice. In addition, a nomogram model was constructed to intuitively and accurately evaluate the prognosis of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ting-Ting Cui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nian-Jun Xiao
- Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Li
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
- Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
- Minimally Invasive Digestive Disease Center, Beijing United Family Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Insight into autophagy in platinum resistance of cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:354-362. [PMID: 36705869 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02301-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Platinum drugs, as a class of widely used chemotherapy agents, frequently appear in the treatment of cancer at different phrases. However, platinum resistance is the major bottleneck of platinum drugs for exerting anti-tumor effect. At present, the mechanism of platinum resistance has been thoroughly explored in terms of drug delivery methods, DNA damage repair function, etc., but it has not yet been translated into an effective weapon for reversing platinum resistance. Recently, autophagy has been proved to be closely related to platinum resistance, and the involved molecular mechanism may provide a new perspective on platinum resistance. The aim of this review is to sort out the studies related to autophagy and platinum resistance, and to focus on summarizing the relevant molecular mechanisms, so as to provide clues for future studies related to autophagy and platinum resistance.
Collapse
|
5
|
Toxicity and Timing of Breast Radiation Therapy With Overlapping Systemic Therapies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:377-381. [PMID: 36152640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
6
|
Chen Y, Zhu Z, Zhao W, Liu Q, Zhang J, Deng J, Ai D, Lu S, Jiang L, Tseng I, Jia H, Zhao K. Long-Term Results of a Phase 2 Study of Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Using S-1 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Were Elderly or With Serious Comorbidities. Front Oncol 2022; 12:839765. [PMID: 35449578 PMCID: PMC9016823 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.839765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal evidence-based management for the subsets of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities is currently lacking. This study aimed to assess the safety and local control rate (LCR) of S-1 (tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil potassium) combined with radiotherapy in these subsets of ESCC patients. Methods Locally advanced ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to age >75 years or serious comorbidities were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial. The patients were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1, which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. The primary end-point was the 3-year LCR. Results One hundred five ESCC patients were recruited between March 2013 and October 2015. At the median follow-up of 73.1 months (IQR 65.5–81.4 months), 3-year LCR was 61.1%, and 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival was 77.9, 42.3, and 24.8% respectively. For safety analysis, ≥grade 3 acute adverse events included thrombocytopenia (6.7%), leukopenia (2.9%), anemia (1.0%), anorexia (1.0%), fatigue (10.5%), hiccup (1.0%), pneumonitis (4.8%), and esophagitis (3.8%). Two patients (1.9%) died of late esophageal hemorrhage, and one patient (1.0%) died of late radiation-induced pneumonitis. Conclusion S-1 is a promising regimen in concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low toxicity and a favorable LCR in ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01831531.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengfei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixin Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiaying Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Dashan Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Saiquan Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Liuqing Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ihsuan Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Kuaile Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo S, Liu F, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhang X, Ye W, Luo G, Li Q, Chen N, Hu N, Wang B, Zhang J, Lin M, Feng H, Qiu B. A Prospective Phase II Study of Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiotherapy Concurrently With CDDP/S1 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Elderly. Front Oncol 2021; 11:760631. [PMID: 34900709 PMCID: PMC8654786 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.760631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To explore the efficacy and toxicity of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) concurrently with cisplatin (CDDP) and S1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods This single-arm, phase II study enrolled pathologically confirmed, stage II-IVa ESCC of 70-80 years old and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2. Patients received SMART (64 Gy to gross tumor volume and 48 Gy to clinical target volume in 30 fractions) with concurrent CDDP (day 1 of each week) and S1 (days 1-14, 22-35). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results Thirty-seven eligible patients were analyzed with median follow-up of 25.7 months for all and 46.1 months for survivors. The ORR was 88.9%. Patients with baseline weight loss <5% (p=0.050) and nutritional risk index (NRI) ≥105.2 (p=0.023) had better tumor response. Median PFS was 13.8 months with 2-year PFS of 37.5%. Median OS was 27.7 months with 2-year OS of 57.5%. OS was significantly associated with ECOG PS (p=0.005), stage (p=0.014), gross tumor volume (p=0.004), baseline NRI (p=0.036), baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p=0.003) and tumor response (p=0.000). CRP level (p=0.016) and tumor response (p=0.021) were independently prognostic of OS. ≥grade 3 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 2.7%, 10.8% and 13.5% of patients; ≥grade 3 esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 18.9% and 2.7% of patient, respectively. Conclusion SMART concurrently with CDDP/S1 yielded satisfactory response rate, survival outcome and tolerable treatment-related toxicities in elderly patients with ESCC. Further studies are warranted to validate the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SuPing Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - FangJie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - YingJia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - XuHui Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - WenFeng Ye
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - GuangYu Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - QiWen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - NaiBin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - MaoSheng Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - HuiXia Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hsieh JCH, Chiang PC, Hung TM, Chao YK, Kuo YC, Wen CT, Su PJ, Peng MT, Chen HW, Liu HL, Chang HK, Wu MH, Wang HM. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin is superior to cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using retrospective, real-world evidence. Cancer Med 2021; 10:8300-8309. [PMID: 34706159 PMCID: PMC8633257 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal definitive chemotherapy regimen during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear because of conflicting evidence. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of taxane‐based chemotherapy with that of conventional cisplatin plus 5‐fluorouracil (PF) as the chemotherapy regimen in definitive CRT for ESCC. Patients and Methods This retrospective study included patients with ESCC who received paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or PF during definitive CRT between May 2012 and February 2015 in a medical center in Taiwan. Survival outcomes were compared after adjustment for risk factors. Results Overall, 229 patients were evaluated. Patients in the PC group had an objective response rate of 71.1% compared with the 51.4% of the PF group (p = 0.016). The PC group showed a significantly longer progression‐free survival (PFS, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.019) than the PF group. Salvage surgery also helped prolong both the PFS and OS (p < 0001). Sex (male vs. female, HR, 1.831; 95% CI, 1.016–3.303), clinical stage (HR, 1.282; 95% CI, 1.069–1.537), accumulative radiation dose (≥41.4 Gy vs. <41.4 Gy; HR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.413–0.993), salvage surgery (yes vs. no, HR: 0.412, 95% CI: 0.298–0.570), and regimen (PF vs. PC; HR, 1.514; 95% CI, 1.109–2.067) were independent prognostic factors for cancer mortality. Conclusion Compared with the PF regimen, the PC regimen for definitive CRT yielded significantly increased response rates and longer survival times; therefore, the PC regimen may be preferable for chemotherapy for definitive CRT in patients with advanced ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Chun Chiang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Min Hung
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Kai Chao
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chia Kuo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Tsung Wen
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Jung Su
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Ting Peng
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Huan-Wu Chen
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Emergency and Critical Care Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Department of Emergency and Critical Care Radiology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ling Liu
- Case Manager, Department of Nursing, Cancer Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsien-Kun Chang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Min-Hsien Wu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Ming Wang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li J, Xu H, Zou J, Wang X, Li Z, Shen Y. Cisplatin/capecitabine with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:432-436. [PMID: 33556252 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1879250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mitomycin (MMC)/5-fluoroural (5-FU) with concurrent radiation is the standard treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) as an alternative with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in ASCC setting. METHODS We retrospectively screened all patients with stage I-IV ASCC from January 2010 to June 2019. The records of patients who received definitive chemoradiation with cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) and IMRT were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The first patient was treated with XP in 2017, so totally 11 patients were included in our study from January 2017 to June 2019. All patients have experienced clinical complete response (cCR). After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 18-39 months), no patient had local recurrence or distant metastasis. Two-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) and two-year disease-free survival (DFS) were both 100%. The median overall survival (OS) has not reached. Grade 3 acute toxicities included leukopenia (1, 9.1%), neutropenia (2, 18.2%) and thrombocytopenia (2, 18.2%). No grade 4 acute adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION In our study, cisplatin/capecitabine combined with IMRT was safe in ASCC patients, with favorable efficacy as an alternative, and is expected to be explored in study with larger sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jielang Li
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Huanji Xu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Jiahuan Zou
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Zhiping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Yali Shen
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang AD, Su XH, Shi GF, Han C, Wang L, Liu H, Zhang J, Zhang RH. Survival Comparision of Three-dimensional Radiotherapy Alone vs. Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Arch Med Res 2020; 51:419-428. [PMID: 32418649 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone. METHODS A total of 753 well-matched patients were enrolled. A total of 299 patients were treated with CRT, and 454 patients were treated with RT alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with the R project. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and the log-rank test was used to assess differences in survival. RESULTS The response rate was 99.0% with CRT and 98.3% with RT alone (p = 0.651). The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10 year overall survival (OS) rates were as follows: 72.2, 40.1, 30.7 and 13.9% with CRT, 68.1, 35.2%, 23.3 and 12.5% with RT alone (p = 0.033); 73.4, 40.1, 31.0 and 16.1% with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); and 68.1, 35.2, 23.3 and 12.5% with RT alone (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in OS between the CCRT group and the sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) group (p = 0.527). Consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT led to a significant increase in the OS rate compared with no CCT after CCRT (p = 0.003). Compared with the OS of patients who received 1∼2 cycles of CCT, the OS of patients who received 3∼4 cycles of CCT was significantly improved (p = 0.011). Acute toxic effects were more severe in the CRT, but no significant differences in late reactions. CRT exhibited more appetite loss and fatigue symptoms than RT alone, and dysphagia of CRT relief more obviously. The CRT group had a significantly lower rate of local control failure than the RT alone group (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS For patients with ESCC, CRT led to a significantly improved OS compared to RT alone, and this trend was more obvious with CCRT. CCT after CCRT prolonged OS, especially in patients who received at least 2 cycles of CCT. CRT can reduce the deaths due to local control failure compared to RT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An-Du Zhang
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Xiao-Hua Su
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Gao-Feng Shi
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
| | - Chun Han
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Ruo-Hui Zhang
- Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luo H, Song H, Mao R, Gao Q, Feng Z, Wang N, Song S, Jiao R, Ni P, Ge H. Targeting valosin-containing protein enhances the efficacy of radiation therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2019; 110:3464-3475. [PMID: 31454136 PMCID: PMC6825005 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Overcoming resistance to radiation is a great challenge in cancer therapy. Here, we highlight that targeting valosin‐containing protein (VCP) improves radiation sensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cell lines and show the potential of using VCP as a prognosis marker in locally advanced ESCC treated with radiation therapy. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines with high VCP expression were treated with VCP inhibitor combined with radiotherapy. Cell proliferation, colony formation, cell death, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling were evaluated. Moreover, patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced ESCC who were treated with radiotherapy were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of VCP. The correlation between overall survival and VCP was investigated. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells treated with VCP inhibitor and radiotherapy showed attenuated cell proliferation and colony formation and enhanced apoptosis. Further investigation showed this combined strategy activated the ER stress signaling involved in unfolded protein response, and inhibited the ER‐associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. Clinical analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the low VCP expression group. Targeting VCP resulted in antitumor activity and enhanced the efficacy of radiation therapy in ESCC cells in vitro. Valosin‐containing protein is a promising and novel target. In patients with locally advanced ESCC who received radiotherapy, VCP can be considered as a useful prognostic indicator of overall survival. Valosin‐containing protein inhibitors could be developed for use as effective cancer therapies, in combination with radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hengli Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ronghu Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhuo Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shuai Song
- The School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruidi Jiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Peizan Ni
- The School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hong Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tumor Compactness based on CT to predict prognosis after multimodal treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10497. [PMID: 31324827 PMCID: PMC6642095 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46899-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to establish a risk model using computed tomography-based compactness to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after multimodal treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We extracted pre-treatment computed tomography-based tumor data (volume, surface area, and compactness) for 512 cases of ESCC that were treated at 3 centers. A risk model based on compactness was trained using Cox regression analyses of data from 83 cases, and then the model was validated using two independent cohorts (98 patients and 283 patients). The largest cohort (283 patients) was then evaluated using the risk model to predict response to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. In the three datasets, the pre-treatment compactness risk model provided good accuracy for predicting OS (P = 0.012, P = 0.022, and P = 0.003) and PFS (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.005). Patients in the low-risk group did not experience a significant OS benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.099). Furthermore, after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the OS outcomes were similar among patients in the low-risk group who did and did not achieve a pathological complete response (P = 0.127). Tumor compactness was correlated with clinical T stage but was more accurate for predicting prognosis after treatment for ESCC, based on higher C-index values in all three datasets. The compactness-based risk model was effective for predicting OS and PFS after multimodal treatment for ESCC. Therefore, it may be useful for guiding personalized treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Q, Zhang WC, Zhang BZ, Zhang HL, Zhang JQ, Pang QS, Wang P. Application of the proposed eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union of International Cancer Control esophageal cancer staging system in esophageal cancer patients. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Wen-cheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Bao-zhong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Hua-lei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Jia-qi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Qing-song Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huang C, Zhu Y, Li Q, Zhang W, Liu H, Zhang W, Hu Y, Yuan Y, Liu M. Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a single agent or double agents vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers. Cancer Med 2019; 8:28-39. [PMID: 30600600 PMCID: PMC6346235 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer (OC) is increasing as the population ages. Until now, the treatment strategy in these patients has been unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with radiotherapy alone (RT alone), single‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐1), or double‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐2) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with OC. A total of 271 patients with OC aged 65 years or older were included in this study. The median overall survival (OS), median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment‐related toxicities were assessed. The median OS time for all patients was 23.6 ± 2.3 months, with 2‐year survival rates of 48.0 ± 3.0%. The median PFS time was 13.6 ± 1.3 months with the 2‐year PFS rate was 33.0 ± 4.0%. Among patients who received CCRT‐1, better OS, and PFS were found in patients who received docetaxel than in patients received fluorouracil and platinum. In a subgroup analysis, 118 patients who underwent RT alone had a median OS time of 15.6 ± 1.9 months and median PFS time of 10.4 ± 0.9 months. The median OS time of patients who received CCRT‐1 was 28.8 ± 10.1 months compared with 27.8 ± 2.5 months for the patients treated with CCRT‐2 (P = 0.537). The similar results were observed for median PFS, with 16.5 ± 3.2 months in the CCRT‐1 group and 17.0 ± 2.0 months in the CCRT‐2 group (P = 0.321). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 weight loss during treatment occurred in 40.6% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, in the CCRT‐2 group, which was higher than that observed in the CCRT‐1 group. Our results suggested that CCRT could be considered as an acceptable treatment for elderly patients with OC. The CCRT‐1 group presented with a lower incidence of treatment toxicities but comparable survival outcomes, compared to the CCRT‐2 group. Docetaxel was superior to fluorouracil and platinum in terms of OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyue Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yujia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiwen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenwen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weijun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yawei Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song T, Fang M, Wu S. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy tailored to the older adults with esophageal cancer: state of the art and the future. Clin Interv Aging 2018; 13:2275-2287. [PMID: 30519009 PMCID: PMC6233861 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s179014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to review the published literature addressing the question of whether geriatric assessment (GA) should be routinely applied in the treatment of older adults with esophageal cancer (EC) who have received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Materials and methods A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed. Studies that contained original data outlining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment compliance rate, and severe toxicity reports were reviewed. Additionally, criteria from ongoing clinical trials in the World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health registries were reviewed to evaluate the utilization of GA-related domains in elderly EC patients who received dCRT. Results Twenty-nine studies were identified based on the selection criteria: five were single-arm prospective studies, and the other studies were retrospective studies. All studies used chronological age and performance status as basic descriptors for this subpopulation. The comorbidity index and the malnutrition level were mentioned in several studies. However, factors such as “Demographic data and social support,” “Psychology,” “Polypharmacy,” and “Geriatric syndromes” were not described in any of the included studies. Unfortunately, the results were similar for the registered clinical trials. Finally, treatment compliance and toxicity profile were found to be acceptable in selected elderly EC patients. Conclusion The current experience for older adults with EC receiving dCRT is mainly based on the results of a series of retrospective studies. Ongoing clinical trials should routinely consider GA-related domains to select appropriate treatments for patients in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shixiu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Retrospective analysis of safety profile of high-dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:293-299. [PMID: 30270099 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of high-dose (60 Gy) concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with standard-dose (50.4-54 Gy) CCRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing CCRT were eligible for a propensity score matched cohort (1:1 for high dose versus standard dose). Adverse events, local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS A total of 380 patients with good balance in observed co-variables were enrolled. OS and LC rates of patients receiving high-dose CCRT were significantly higher than those receiving standard-dose CCRT, with the 10-year OS at 24% versus 13.3%, respectively. In contrast, there was a trend towards increased grades 2-3 acute oesophagitis toxicity among patients receiving high-dose versus standard-dose CCRT (37.4% versus 27.9%, respectively). None experienced grade 5 acute oesophagitis and grade 4 acute toxicities were rare. Similar rates of late radiation oesophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, gastrointestinal reactions and haematological toxicities were observed between patients receiving high-dose versus standard-dose CCRT. Six patients (3.2%) receiving high-dose CCRT experienced >grade 3 leucocytopaenia, and two (1.1%) received standard-dose CCRT, whereas none experienced >grade 3 thrombocytopaenia or anaemia. Three patients (2.3%) receiving high-dose CCRT died of infections caused by myelosuppression. Multivariate analysis showed that anaemia is a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Compared with standard-dose CCRT, high-dose CCRT yielded more favourable local control and survival outcomes for patients with OSCC. Grades 2-3 acute oesophagitis toxicity in patients undergoing high-dose CCRT increased, whereas severe, life-threatening toxicities (>grade 3) did not.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Cutaneous malignancy of the head and neck affects a large proportion of elderly patients. The severity ranges from small, easily treatable lesions to large, invasive, potentially metastatic tumors. Surgical treatment is the primary treatment of most skin cancers; however, geriatric patients are more likely to have multiple comorbidities that increase the risk of surgery. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including surgical, radiation, and medical therapy. Recommendations and treatment options for basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and melanoma are outlined and reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian B Hughley
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, BDB 563, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0012, USA.
| | - Cecelia E Schmalbach
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck-Microvascular Surgery, Clinical Affairs, Indiana University School of Medicine, Fesler Hall, 1130 W. Michigan Street, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|