The efficacy of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization loaded with gemcitabine for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Clinical research progress of callisperes® of drug-loaded microsphere arterial chemoembolisation in the treatment of solid tumors

The incidence and mortality of cancer is ever-increasing, which poses a significant challengesto human health and a substantial economic burden to patients. At present, chemotherapy is still a primary treatment for various cancers. However, chemotherapy kills tumors but also induces the related side effects, whichadversely impacting patient quality of life and exacerbating suffering. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new and effective treatments that can control tumor growth while reducing the side effects for patients. Arterial chemoembolization has been attracted much attentionwhich attributed to the advantage of ability to embolize tumor vessels to block blood and nutrition supplies. Thus, to achieve local tumor control, it has become an effective means of local tumor control and has been widely used in clinical practice. Despite its efficacy, conventional arterial chemoembolization techniques, limited by embolization materials, have been associated with incomplete embolization and suboptimal drug delivery outcomes. Gradually, researchers have shifted their attention to a new type of embolic material called CalliSperes® drug-eluting embolic bead (DEB). DEB can not only load high doses of drugs, but also has strong sustained drug release ability and good biocompatibility. The integration of DEBs with traditional arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) promises targeted vascular embolization, mitigated tumor ischemia and hypoxia, and direct intravascular chemotherapy delivery. It can prevent cancer cell differentiation and accelerate their death, meanwhile, directly injecting chemotherapy drugs into the target blood vessels reduced the blood concentration of the whole body, thus reduced the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy. Furthermore, DEB-TACE's sustained drug release capability elevates local drug concentrations at the tumor site, amplifying its antitumor efficacy. Therefore, DEB-TACE has become a hot spot in clinical research worldwide. This review introduces the pathogenesis of solid tumors, the background of research and biological characteristics of DEB, and the action mechanism of DEB-TACE, as well as its clinical research in various solid tumors and future prospects. This review aims to provide new ideas for the treatment of DEB-TACE in various solid tumors.

Maintenance treatment of immunotherapy after microwave ablation plus drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Background

The combination therapy of immunotherapy and drug-eluting bead bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) or microwave ablation (MWA) has been attempted as an effective and safe approach for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the outcomes of immunotherapy plus multiple interventional techniques for advanced NSCLC remain unclear. This retrospective study thus aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the maintenance treatment of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade after MWA plus DEB-BACE for advanced NSCLC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study consists of 95 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with DEB-BACE between April 2017 and October 2022 and who were allocated to three groups: group A (MWA + DEB-BACE + PD-1 blockade; n=15), group B (MWA + DEB-BACE; n=25), and group C (DEB-BACE alone; n=55). The adverse events (AEs) were compared between the three groups. The outcomes were compared via Kaplan-Meier methods, including median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed via the univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the prognostic predictors.

Results

The overall incidence of AEs in the groups A-C was 53.3% (8/15), 36.0% (9/25), and 32.7% (18/55), respectively, which did not represent a significant difference (P=0.42). No severe AEs (SAEs) occurred. Group A, compared with group B and group C, had a significantly longer estimated median PFS (33.0 vs. 7.0 vs. 3.0 months; P<0.001) and OS (33.0 vs. 13.0 vs. 6.0 months; P=0.002). PD-1 blockade (P=0.006), tumor number (P=0.01), and DEB-BACE/bronchial artery infusion (BAI) chemotherapy cycles (P=0.04) were identified as the predictors of PFS, while the predictors of OS were PD-1 blockade (P<0.001), number of metastases (P<0.001), tumor diameter (P<0.001), and DEB-BACE/BAI cycles (P=0.02).

Conclusions

Compared with that of advanced NSCLC treated with MWA plus DEB-BACE or DEB-BACE alone, the maintenance treatment of immunotherapy after MWA plus DEB-BACE might provide a superior prognosis without increasing the risk of AEs.

Bronchial arterial chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting beads plus sequential chemotherapy for the treatment of stage III and IV lung squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-BACE) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with stage III and IV lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) who are not appropriate candidates for radiochemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we screened all adult patients undergoing either DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for stage III or IV LCSS at authors' center from January 2018 to August 2021. Each 21-day chemotherapy cycle consisted of intravenous injection of gemcitabine (1.0 g/m2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 (mg/m2) on day 1. The planned cycles were 4. DEB-BACE consisted of microcatheter infusion of CalliSpheres beads carrying cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1.0 g/m2), at 3 weeks prior to chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), pulmonary response, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The final analysis included 95 patients in the chemotherapy group and 41 patients in the combination treatment group. The median OS was 14 months (95 % CI 11.0-17.0) in the chemotherapy group and 19 months (95 % CI 18.0-24.0) in the combination group (P = 0.015). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy was associated with lower risk of death versus chemotherapy only (HR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.05-0.52; log rank test P = 0.003). The median PFS was 6 months (95 % CI 4.0-7.0) in the chemotherapy group and 8 months (95 % CI 6.0-8.0) in the combination group (P = 0.015). The pulmonary objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 48.4 % and 62.1 % in chemotherapy group versus 82.9 % and 90.2 % in combination group (P < 0.001 and = 0.001, respectively). AEs occurred in 133 patients (97.8 %). The rate of bone marrow suppression was 48.4 % (46/95) in the chemotherapy group versus 7.3 % (3/41) in the combination group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy was associated with longer survival outcomes and lower rate of bone marrow suppression.

CT-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Combined with Local Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy of Malignant Pulmonary Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) combined with 125I seed implantation or bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pulmonary tumors.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients who underwent MWA, MWA combined with 125I particle implantation, or MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer or metastatic lung cancer from January 2015 to June 2021 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. Among them, 21 patients were treated with MWA (MWA), 18 with MWA combined with 125I seed implantation (MWA+125I), and 17 with MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy (MWA+BAI). The short-term outcomes, complications, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (Zubrod-ECOG-WHO, ZPS), survival, and factors related to survival were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

The response rate of the MWA group (9.52%) was significantly lower than that of the MWA+125I group (50.00%) and MWA+BAI chemotherapy group (47.06%), and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the MWA, MWA+125I, and MWA+BAI chemotherapy groups was 47.62%, 55.56%, and 52.94%, respectively, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Three months after the treatment, the ZPS of the MWA+125I and MWA+BAI chemotherapy groups was significantly lower than before treatment and significantly lower than that of the MWA group in the same period; the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The median survival time of the MWA+125I group was 18 (9.983, 26.017) months and that of the MWA+BAI chemotherapy group was 21 (0.465, 41.535) months, both of which were higher than that of the MWA group [11 (6.686, 15.314) months]; the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis was performed on the factors related to survival and revealed treatment mode as a protective factor [HR = 0.433, 95% CI = (0.191, 0.984), p = 0.046]. Other factors, such as gender, age, and tumor size, did not independently affect survival.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided MWA combined with 125I seed implantation and MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy are safe and effective for the treatment of advanced lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer, and can control tumor progression and prolong survival time.

Machine Learning Classifier for Preoperative Prediction of Early Recurrence After Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Treatment in Lung Cancer Patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) was deemed as an effective and safe approach for advanced standard treatment-ineligible/rejected lung cancer patients. However, the therapeutic outcome of BACE varies greatly and there is no reliable prognostic tool in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of radiomics features in predicting tumor recurrence after BACE treatment in lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 116 patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer who received BACE treatment were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT within 2 weeks before BACE treatment and were followed up for more than 6 months. We conducted a machine learning-based characterization of each lesion on the preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images. In the training cohort, recurrence-related radiomics features were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Three predictive radiomics signatures were built with linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR) algorithms, respectively. Univariate and multivariate LR analyses were performed to select the independent clinical predictors for recurrence. The radiomics signature with best predictive performance was integrated with the clinical predictors to form a combined model, which was visualized as a nomogram. The performance of the combined model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Nine recurrence-related radiomics features were screened out, and three radiomics signatures (RadscoreLDA, RadscoreSVM and RadscoreLR) were built based on these features. Patients were classified into the low-risk and high-risk groups based on the optimal threshold of three signatures. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis showed that patients of low-risk group achieved longer PFS than patients of high-risk group (P < 0.05). The combined model including RadscoreLDA and independent clinical predictors (tumor size, carcinoembryonic antigen and pro-gastrin releasing peptide) achieved the best predictive performance for recurrence after BACE treatment. It yields AUCs of 0.865 and 0.867 in the training and validation cohorts, with accuracy (ACC) of 0.804 and 0.750, respectively. Calibration curves indicated that the probability of recurrence predicted by the model fits well with the actual recurrence probability. DCA showed that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics and clinical predictors-based nomogram can predict tumor recurrence after BACE treatment effectively, which allowing oncologists to identify potential recurrence and enable better patient management and clinical decision-making.

In Vitro Drug Loading, Releasing Profiles, and In Vivo Embolic Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a Novel Drug-Eluting Microsphere (CalliSpheres)

Background: To investigate morphology, physical property, loadability, stability, and release profiles of a novel drug-eluting microsphere, CalliSpheres, in vitro and to explore its embolic efficacy and safety in vivo. Materials and Methods: CalliSpheres (50-150 μm, 100-300 μm, and 300-500 μm) and doxorubicin in different amounts (20, 40, 80, and 100 mg) and concentrations (5 and 10 mg/mL) were prepared for experiments. Dynamic light scattering and an Agilent 1260 high-performance liquid chromatography system were used to quantify bead diameters and the efficiency of drug loading and release, respectively. Twelve New Zealand rabbits were treated with catheter-aided hepatic embolization using CalliSpheres. Results: CalliSpheres displayed a red color after loading with doxorubicin, and the mean diameters decreased by 20.7-25.8%. Almost 100% of the drug was incorporated with CalliSpheres in different sizes immersed with doxorubicin 20 mg, while loading efficiency ranged from 75.8% to 100.0% with doxorubicin at 40, 80, and 100 mg dependent on CalliSpheres sizes (smaller sizes, higher loading efficiency). Elevated loading efficiency was observed at higher concentration of doxorubicin solutions. Regarding release profiles, doxorubicin was released from CalliSpheres quickly at the very beginning, and doxorubicin release percentage was increased in the 50-150 μm group (39.2% ± 1.2%) compared with the 100-300 μm group (31.3% ± 1.3%) and 300-500 μm group (31.7% ± 2.5%). Digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography, and histopathologic emanation results proved in vivo safety and embolic efficacy of CalliSpheres. Conclusions: CalliSpheres present with good physical characteristics and satisfactory loading and releasing profiles in vitro and are well tolerated and efficient in embolization in vivo.

Loadability and Releasing Profiles In Vitro and Pharmacokinetics In Vivo of Vinorelbine and Raltitrexed by CalliSpheres Beads

Background: This study investigated the loadability and releasing profiles of vinorelbine and raltitrexed from CalliSpheres® Beads (CB) in vitro, and further explored the pharmacokinetic features of vinorelbine and raltitrexed eluting CB in vivo. Materials and Methods: Ten milligrams vinorelbine and 0.2 mg raltitrexed were mixed with 0.15 g CB at two sizes (100-300 and 300-500 μm) for 24 h, respectively, to measure the loadability. Then vinorelbine/raltitrexed loading CBs were placed in 20% phosphate-buffered saline for 24 h to measure the release profiles. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with 1 mg vinorelbine eluting CBs (two sizes respectively) and transcatheter arterial hepatic infusion (TAI) with 1 mg vinorelbine were performed in 9 rabbits (3 rabbits in each group). The above experiments were repeated with 0.2 mg raltitrexed. Results: Vinorelbine loading efficiency quickly reached 90% within 10 min with maximum loadability >90% by CB with both two sizes, and vinorelbine release rate gradually increased to ∼100% within 1 h. Raltitrexed loading efficiency gradually increased to >40% within 15 min, then slowly increased to >60% within 24 h, with maximum loadability <70% by CB with both sizes, and raltitrexed release rate gradually increased to >90% within 1 h. Besides, vinorelbine/raltitrexed eluting CB showed greatly decreased maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of the drug compared with TAI in rabbits with similar area under the curve (0-t), mean residence time (0-t), and half-time (T1/2). Conclusion: CB exhibits good loadability and an acceptable releasing profile for eluting vinorelbine and raltitrexed, and shows lower Cmax and numerically stable concentration than TAI.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization/bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy with and without PD-1 blockade for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative single-center cohort study

Background

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE)/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy (BAI) have been investigated as treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for those patients who develop refractoriness to or are intolerant to systemic chemotherapy. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of DEB-BACE/BAI with and without programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade for advanced NSCLC, and to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combination regimens.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included advanced NSCLC patients who were intolerant to or were resistant to systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or molecular targeted therapy and underwent DEB-BACE/BAI between October 2016 and October 2021 in Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology. A total of 84 advanced NSCLC patients (DEB-BACE/BAI + PD-1 blockade group: group A, n=27; DEB-BACE/BAI: group B, n=57) were enrolled finally. The embolic agent CalliSpheres (100-300, 300-500, or 500-700 µm) loaded with gemcitabine (800 mg) was administered during the DEB-BACE procedure. The adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were compared. Of these, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared via Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the predictors of PFS and OS.

Results

KM methods showed that group A had longer median PFS (12.0 vs. 3.0 months, P<0.001) and OS (27.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001) than group B. The predictors of PFS for DEB-BACE/BAI included tumor diameter (P=0.013), immunotherapy (P<0.001), and DEB-BACE/BAI cycles (P=0.012), whereas the predictors of OS included tumor diameter (P=0.021), extrapulmonary metastases (P=0.041), immunotherapy (P<0.001), and DEB-BACE/BAI cycles (P=0.020). The incidence rates of overall AEs in groups A and B were 40.7% (11/27) and 36.8% (21/57), respectively, and no significant difference was found (P=0.731). Group A had an incidence rate of 11.1% for grade 3 immunotherapy-related AEs (irAEs). There were no incidences of ectopic embolization or spinal artery injury.

Conclusions

Compared with DEB-BACE/BAI, PD-1 blockade plus DEB-BACE/BAI could improve the prognosis for advanced NSCLC despite the associated risk of grade 3 irAEs. The combination regimens are promising and safe approaches for advanced NSCLC.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization vs. conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting bead bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with conventional bronchial artery chemoembolization (cBACE) and provide a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC underwent DEB-BACE or cBACE and were screened retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcome indicators, while technical success rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were the secondary ones.

Results

A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study, 12 in the DEB-BACE group and 29 in the cBACE group, according to the treatment regimen. No patient achieved complete response. Eighteen patients achieved partial response (9 in each group), 15 patients achieved stable disease (3 in the DEB-BACE group and 12 in the cBACE group), and eight patients achieved progressive disease (all in the cBACE group) when treated for 2 months. The overall ORR and DCR were 43.9% (18/41) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. ORR and DCR in the DEB-BACE group were 50.0% (9/12) and 100.0% (12/12), respectively, while ORR and DCR in the cBACE group were 31.0% (9/29) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. Compared to cBACE, the ORR and DCR of DEB-BACE were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The median PFS was better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (6.95 months vs. 3.20 months, respectively, Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.416; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the median OS was significantly better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (28.5 months vs. 22.5 months, respectively, HR = 0.316; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

DEB-BACE has a good safety and therapeutic profile in advanced NSCLC and is superior to cBACE. DEB-BACE can be used as an alternative treatment option for advanced NSCLC, even in elderly patients.

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres® Microsphere transcatheter-arterial chemoembolization versus conventional TACE in treating renal angiomyolipoma patients

Objective

Transcatheter-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a well-established interventional technique for various tumor treatments, whereas its application in renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) is seldom reported. Conventional TACE (cTACE) with bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion is effective and tolerable for RAML treatment. In this study, we aimed to further explore the efficacy and safety between bleomycin-loaded CalliSpheres® microsphere TACE (CSM-TACE) and cTACE in treating RAML patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 54 RAML patients treated by CSM-TACE (n = 17) or cTACE (n = 37). Data on tumor size, tumor volume reduction ratio, patient percentage with tumor size reduction, white blood cells (WBCs), creatinine (Cre) after treatment, complications, and adverse events were retrieved.

Results

Tumor size (88.66 vs. 81.19 cm3, P = 0.970), patient percentage with tumor size reduction (12 [70.59%] vs. 30 [81.08%], P = 0.486) after treatment, WBCs (P = 0.114), Cre (P = 0.659), and change in Cre after treatment (P = 0.947) were not significantly different between groups, whereas tumor volume reduction ratio was slightly lower in the CSM-TACE group than in the cTACE group (12 ± 34% vs. 32 ± 31%, P = 0.047). The most common postoperative complication was a post-embolization syndrome, including fever, nausea, and abdominal pain, which occurred in 9 (52.94%) and 14 (37.84%) patients from the CSM-TACE and cTACE groups, respectively (P = 0.347).

Conclusion

CSM-TACE is effective in and well tolerated by RAML patients, implying its potential as an alternative therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Beads Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization in Treating Patients with Lung Cancer Who Were Complicated with Hemoptysis

Background: This study explored the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) in patients with lung cancer who were complicated with hemoptysis. Materials and Methods: In total, 11 patients with lung cancer who were complicated with hemoptysis and underwent DEB-BACE treatment were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as no hemoptysis or reduction of hemoptysis volume >50% after treatment. Hemoptysis recurrence was recorded, and overall survival (OS) was calculated. Results: After DEB-BACE treatment, the clinical and technical success was 100%: in detail, 10 (90.0%) patients presented with no hemoptysis and 1 (9.1%) patient exhibited a reduction of hemoptysis volume >50%. Regarding the prognosis, 1 (9.1%) patient had hemoptysis recurrence at 46 d after DEB-BACE treatment. Furthermore, 4 (36.4%) patients died (1 [9.1%] patient died of nonhemoptysis asphyxia; 1 [9.1%] patient died of massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage; 1 [9.1%] patient died of respiratory failure; and 1 [9.1%] patient died of hemoptysis recurrence). Additionally, the mean OS in total patients was 14.2 (95% confidence interval: 8.2-20.3) months. As to adverse events, 1 (9.1%) patient showed high fever, 2 (18.2%) patients exhibited low fever, and 1 (9.1%) patient suffered from chest pain. Conclusions: DEB-BACE can be considered an effective and safe treatment in treating hemoptysis in patients with lung cancer.

Bevacizumab loaded CalliSpheres® bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Background: As a new drug delivery and embolization system, drug-eluted bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) can not only embolize the tumor blood supply artery but also load chemotherapy drugs and slowly release them into the local environment. Bevacizumab (BEV) combined with chemotherapy drugs has attained significant achievements in the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of BEV-loaded DEB-BACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-loaded CalliSpheres® bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Nine patients with LUAD who received BEV-loaded CalliSpheres® BACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy from 1 Jan 2021 to Dec 2021 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR) and the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival rates (OS) at 6 months and 12 months. The tumor response was evaluated according to the mRECIST standard. Safety was assessed by the occurrences of adverse events and the severity of the adverse events. Results: All patients received CalliSpheres® BACE loaded with BEV (200 mg) in combination with immunotherapy and targeted therapy. A total of nine patients received the BACE procedures 20 times, four of them received a third session of BACE, three underwent a second session of DEB-BACE, and two underwent one cycle of DEB-BACE. Partial response and stable disease were found in seven (77.8%), and two (22.2%) patients, respectively, 1 month after the last multimodal treatment. The ORR at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 77.8%, 66.7%, 44.4%, and 33.3%, respectively, while the DCR was 100%, 77.8%, 44.4%, and 33.3%, respectively. The OS rates at 6-and 12-month were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusion: BEV-loaded CalliSpheres® transcatheter bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy is a promising and well-tolerated treatment for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for bronchial arterial chemoembolization for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer and its impact on quality of life: A multicenter prospective study

Objective

This study aimed to prospectively observe the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The interventional therapy plan was as follows: 300-500 μm CalliSpheres drug-loaded microspheres were loaded with epirubicin, and then slow embolization of tumor supplying artery was performed after microcatheter superselection. Chest enhanced computed tomography and related hematological examination were reviewed after 2 months of DEB-BACE, and the tumor response after the first interventional therapy was evaluated using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The overall survival (OS) of patients was determined, and the quality of life and the incidence rate of adverse reactions were observed.

Results

From January 2019 to January 2021, 43 patients with refractory NSCLC were enrolled. The patients were followed up until June 2022. All 43 patients underwent DEB-BACE 1.79 ± 0.69 times on average. The 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival rates were 100%, 86.0%, 41.9%, and 11.8%, respectively. The median OS was 11.5 months. After the first interventional treatment, cough and wheezing significantly improved in 31 patients, hemoptysis was effectively controlled in 12 patients, and superior vena cava compression disappeared in 2 patients after 2 times of treatment. The general health status of the patients after treatment significantly improved compared with that before treatment, including the improvement in physical and emotional functions. Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, and insomnia improved significantly after treatment. No serious adverse events, such as spinal cord injury and cerebral embolism, were observed during the perioperative period. The main adverse reaction after DEB-BACE was chest pain (13/43, grade 1) followed by fever (10/43, grade 1-2), which was significantly relieved within 3-5 days after symptomatic treatment. Other adverse reactions included irritating cough, nausea and vomiting, and bone marrow suppression, and the incidence was less than 20%.

Conclusions

DEB-BACE was effective and safe in treating refractory NSCLC, which could significantly improve patients' quality of life and was worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Standard treatment-refractory/ineligible small cell lung cancer treated with drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are prone to developing refractoriness to standard treatment, and some patients are ineligible for systemic therapy owing to comorbidities or poor pulmonary function. The prognosis of patient with standard treatment-refractory/ineligible (STRI)-SCLC remains poor. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) for the treatment of SRTI-SCLC and to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS).

Methods

A total of 18 patients with STRI-SCLC who received DEB-BACE were included. Treatment response, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were evaluated. Further molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy was administered as a second-line treatment or beyond for those patients who had not received these regimens previously. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to explore the predictors of OS for STRI-SCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Results

The overall disease control rate at 3 months after DEB-BACE was 77.8% (14/18); of these patients who experienced disease control, partial response and stable disease were achieved in 2 patients (11.1%) and 12 patients (66.7%), respectively. There were 7 patients (38.9%) who received anlotinib after DEB-BACE. No severe DEB-BACE-related or anlotinib-related adverse events were observed. The median PFS was 5.0 months; the 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 55.6% (10/18) and 11.1% (2/18), respectively. The median OS was 9.0 months; the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 77.8% (14/18) and 33.3% (6/18), respectively. Postoperative anlotinib [hazard ratio: 0.302; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.098-0.930; P=0.037] was identified as the predictor of OS in patients with STRI-SCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Conclusions

DEB-BACE is an effective and well-tolerated approach for patients with STRI-SCLC. Postoperative anlotinib is the predictor of OS and may indicate a better prognosis for patients with STRI-SCLC.

Image-Guided Percutaneous and Transarterial Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. A significant proportion of patients with lung cancer are not candidates for surgery and must resort to other treatment alternatives. Rapid technological advancements in fields like interventional radiology have paved the way for valid treatment modalities like image-guided percutaneous and transarterial therapies for treatment of both primary and metastatic lung cancer. The rationale of ablative therapies relies on the fact that focused delivery of energy induces tumor destruction and pathological necrosis. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation therapies are established techniques in the local treatment of hepatic, renal, bone, thyroid, or uterine lesions. In the lung, the 3 main indications for lung ablation include local curative intent, a strategy to achieve a chemoholiday in oligometastatic disease, and recently, oligoprogressive disease. Transarterial therapies include a set of catheter-based treatments that involve delivering embolic and/or chemotherapeutic agents directed into the target tumor via the supplying arteries. This article provides a comprehensive review of the various techniques available and discusses their applications and associated complications in primary and metastatic lung cancer.

Clinical outcomes of vinorelbine loading CalliSpheres beads in the treatment of previously treated advanced lung cancer with progressive refractory obstructive atelectasis

Background: Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) has been used in the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer and has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce recurrence. However, DEB-BACE shows a poor therapeutic effect in advanced lung cancer after failure of multiple therapies. This study assessed the effect of DEB-BACE in the treatment of progressive lung cancer with refractory obstructive atelectasis. Methods: Progressive advanced lung cancer patients with refractory obstructive atelectasis were voluntarily enrolled in this study after failure of multiple conventional therapies. Baseline information, DEB-BACE treatment process, and changes in clinical symptoms were recorded. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and improvement rate of dyspnea. The secondary endpoints were time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and rate of pulmonary re-expansion. Treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events were analyzed to assess the safety of DEB-BACE. The Cox regression model was performed to analyze the possible factors impacting prognosis of DEB-BACE. Results: DEB-BACE was successfully performed with CalliSpheres beads loaded with vinorelbine in the 20 enrolled patients. ORR and disease control rate were 80% and 85%, respectively, at the first follow-up (43.4 ± 15.26 days). The improvement rate of dyspnea was 85% and 80% at 1 week and 1 month (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), respectively. TTP was 41.25 ± 14.43 days and 89.55 ± 61.7 days before and after DEB-BACE, respectively; DEB-BACE delayed the progression of advanced lung cancer (p < 0.0001). OS was 238.03 ± 33.74 days (95% confidence interval: 171.9-304.16). The rate of pulmonary re-expansion was 80% at the first follow-up. The reasons for poor prognosis were tumor necrosis, longer disease duration, and pulmonary atelectasis duration (p = 0.012, p = 0.038, p = 0.029). Massive hemoptysis was observed in two cases, and one patient died of asphyxia caused by hemoptysis. Moderate hemoptysis occurred in one case. All three adverse events were considered as the result of the tumor cavity after DEB-BACE. Conclusion: DEB-BACE loaded with vinorelbine is a feasible option for progressive advanced lung cancer with obstructive atelectasis after failure of other treatments.

The safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer

Aim: Drug-eluting beads are usually applied for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oxaliplatin was suggested as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, there has been little investigation about the application of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres beads (CB) for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin-loaded DEB-TACE for the treatment of unresectable or advanced lung cancer. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2021, all patients with primary unresectable or advanced lung cancer who underwent DEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB were retrospectively enrolled. This study defined overall survival and objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoints, disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 33 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 20 patients, with a mean of 1.7 ± 1.0 sessions. A total of 55 arteries were emoblized by CB, including 40 bronchial arteries, 13 intercostal arteries, one suprarenal artery and one inferior phrenical artery. No procedural-related mortality or severe complications were observed. The median tumor diameter was 49.0 [Interquartile range (IQR) 37.8-66.8] mm before DEB-TACE, and decreased to 38.8 (IQR 27.7-56.9), 26.1 (IQR 19.1-48.8), and 20.5 (IQR 13.1-49.7) mm at 1, 3 and 6 months later (p = 0.04). The ORR and DCR at 1, 3, and 6 months after DEB-TACE were 28.6% and 92.9%, 38.5% and 84.6%, 30.8% and 61.5%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival was 9.9 and 29.6 months, respectively. Conclusion: DEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB is suggested as a safe, effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with unresectable or advanced lung cancer.

The Efficacy of Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Loaded With Oxaliplatin for the Treatment of Stage III-IV Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) loaded with oxaliplatin for stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2018 to May 2021, a total of 31 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC received DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin. Demographic characteristics, adverse events (AEs), and treatment responses were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All 31 patients successfully received DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin. No procedure-related severe adverse events occurred. Hemoptysis symptoms presented in 8 patients but disappeared within 1-3 days. After DEB-TACE for 1, 2, and 6 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 42%, 35%, and 26%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 90%, 84% and 61%, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (range 1-31 months), and the PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 87%, 71% and 29%, respectively. The median OS was 11 months (range 1-31 months), with OS rates of 87%, 77%, and 39% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin-loaded DEB-TACE is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for patients with advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

Bronchial Artery Chemoembolization With Radiopaque Doxorubicin Eluding Beads in Patients With Malignant Hemoptysis from Metastatic Lung Cancer

Purpose:This pilot study was designed to assess the technical feasibility and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization with radiopaque doxorubicin eluting beads (DEB-BACE) in patients with malignant hemoptysis from pulmonary metastasis. Materials & Methods: Four patients underwent DEB-BACE using 70-150 μm radiopaque DEB (LC Beads LUMI, Boston Scientific). Beads delivery and deposition were assessed under fluoroscopy and cone beam computed tomography (CT), respectively. Results: All 4 procedures were technically successful. Beads delivery and deposition were successfully visualized under fluoroscopy and cone beam CT guidance in all cases. Hemoptysis was resolved after embolization in all 4 patients. There were no adverse events or immediate or early complications after DEB-BACE. Two patients (50%) required repeat DEB-BACE within 1 week due to recurrent hemoptysis, and 1 patient had DEB-BACE 1.5 years later due to recurrent hemoptysis from the contralateral lung. All targeted lesions decreased in size in follow-up studies (mean 16 months, range 1-33 months). One patient died of progressive cancer disease invading the heart 1 month after DEB-BACE. Conclusions: DEB-BACE using radiopaque LC Beads LUMI loaded with doxorubicin is technically feasible and safe for controlling hemoptysis and cancer progression in patients with metastatic lung tumors. Visualization of beads delivery under fluoroscopy and deposition of beads under cone beam CT facilitate delivery of beads and embolization of bronchial arteries.

One-step fabrication of lidocaine/CalliSpheres® composites for painless transcatheter arterial embolization

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is one of the first-line treatments for advanced hepatocellular cancer. The pain caused by TAE is a stark complication, which remains to be prevented by biomedical engineering methods.

METHODS

Herein, a commercial embolic agent CalliSpheres^® bead (CB) was functionally modified with lidocaine (Lid) using an electrostatic self-assembly technique. The products were coded as CB/Lid-n (n = 0, 5, 10, corresponding to the relative content of Lid). The chemical compositions, morphology, drug-loading, and drug-releasing ability of CB/Lid-n were comprehensively investigated. The biocompatibility was determined by hemolysis assay, live/dead cell staining assay, CCK8 assay, immunofluorescence (IHC) staining assay and quantitative real-time PCR. The thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) and edema ratio (ER) were performed to evaluate the analgesia of CB/Lid-n using a plantar inflammation model. A series of histological staining, including immunohistochemistry (IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β and Navi1.7) and TUNEL were conducted to reveal the underlying mechanism of anti-tumor effect of CB/Lid-n on a VX2-tumor bearing model.

RESULTS

Lid was successfully loaded onto the surface of CalliSpheres^® bead, and the average diameter of CalliSpheres^® bead increased along with the dosage of Lid. CB/Lid-n exhibited desirable drug-loading ratio, drug-embedding ratio, and sustained drug-release capability. CB/Lid-n had mild toxicity towards L929 cells, while triggered no obvious hemolysis. Furthermore, CB/Lid-n could improve the carrageenan-induced inflammation response micro-environment in vivo and in vitro. We found that CB/Lid-10 could selectively kill tumor by blocking blood supply, inhibiting cell proliferation, and promoting cell apoptosis. CB/Lid-10 could also release Lid to relieve post-operative pain, mainly by remodeling the harsh inflammation micro-environment (IME).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, CB/Lid-10 has relatively good biocompatibility and bioactivity, and it can serve as a promising candidate for painless transcatheter arterial embolization.

Clinical outcomes of gemcitabine-loaded callispheres drug-eluting beads for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer: A case series study

Aim: Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has not been widely used in patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer. We aimed to report the preliminary outcomes of DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer.

Methods: From November 2017 to October 2021, 37 patients (29 males, mean age 64.7 ± 10.3 years) with advanced and inoperable lung cancer underwent DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads. The primary endpoint was overall response rate, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results: A total of 54 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 37 patients, with a technique success rate of 100%. Fourteen patients received a second session of DEB-TACE. The mean follow-up time was 18.7 ± 11.9 months. After 1, 3, and 6 months, overall response rate and disease control rate were 27.8% and 91.7%, 25.8% and 74.2%, 32.1%, and 67.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (95% CI 7.5, 12.5 months). The 3-, 6- and 12- month progression-free survival rates were 67.1%, 57.0%, and 30.1%, respectively. The median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 4.5, 13.1 months). The 3-, 6-, and 12- month overall survival rates were 88.5%, 72.7%, and 40.9%, respectively. Minor complications were observed in 14 patients (37.8%), with no procedure-related deaths or severe adverse events.

Conclusion: DEB-TACE with gemcitabine-loaded CalliSpheres beads is a safe, feasible and effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced and inoperable lung cancer.

Transarterial Treatment of Lung Cancer

Purpose: The treatment efficacy of the transarterial approach to lung cancer is evaluated. Materials and Methods: A total of 98 patients with advanced lung cancer or recurrent lung cancer after the standard therapies were enrolled retrospectively. The bronchial arteries and mediastinal branches from the subclavian artery were selected by a microcatheter. Immediately after the selective arterial infusion of anti-neoplastic agents, embolization with a spherical embolic material was carried out. Local tumor effects and overall survival were evaluated. Result: The mean reduction rate was 17.9%, with 24.2% for partial remission and with 2.1% for progression disease. The rate of stable disease was 72.6%. The response rate was 25.3%, and the disease control rate was 97.9%. The median survival time (MST) was 11.4 months, the 1-year survival rate was 45.2%, and the 2-year survival rate was 35.6%. Although it is insignificant, the MST for 51 adenocarcinomas was higher than that of 29 squamous cell carcinomas (18.6 months and 9.4 months, respectively). The local extension of tumors related to a better prognosis, though it was not significant. Lymph node metastases and distant metastases were poor prognostic factors. No major complications nor treatment-related mortalities were found in this study. Conclusion: The transarterial treatment for lung cancer should be considered as a treatment option when the other treatments were not indicated both in initial cases and in recurrent cases.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization versus conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in lung cancer patients with hemoptysis

Background: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) compared with conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization (cBACE) in lung cancer patients with hemoptysis. Materials & methods: Thirty-six lung cancer patients with hemoptysis treated by DEB-BACE or cBACE were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Technical success of BACE and clinical success of hemoptysis treatment were no different between DEB-BACE and cBACE (both p > 0.050), whereas DEB-BACE achieved increased total clinical response (p = 0.021), objective response rate (p = 0.035) and prolonged hemoptysis relapse-free survival (p = 0.013) compared with cBACE. The adverse event rates were similar between these two groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: DEB-BACE presents with higher tumor treatment response, prolonged hemoptysis relapse-free survival and comparable safety profiles compared with cBACE in lung cancer patients with hemoptysis.

Transarterial chemoembolization of unresectable renal cell carcinoma with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads

The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) still unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy of DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres beads (CB) in patients with unresectable RCC. Between 2016 and 2020, thirty-five patients with unresectable RCC underwent DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CB. The objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the secondary endpoints. Fifteen-seven times of DEB-TACE were performed in 35 patients using doxorubicin-loaded (median 60 mg) CB. Fifteen patients underwent an additional session of DEB-TACE, with intervals of 1 to 1.5 months. Twenty-one patients underwent transarterial infusion with cisplatin or oxaliplatin before DEB-TACE. The median follow-up time was 9.0 months (Range 1.8–43.6 months). ORR and DCR were 47.1% and 94.1%, 29.0% and 87.1%, 23.1% and 84.6% respectively at 1-, 3-, and 6- months after DEB-TACE. The median PFS was 21.4 months, and the 3-, 6- and 12- month PFS rates were 84.7%, 73.7% and 62.3%, respectively. The median OS was 24.6 months, and the 3-, 6- and 12- month OS rates were 93.9%, 87.6% and 65.2%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths or severe adverse events of grade 3 or more. In conclusion, DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CB is a safe, feasible and effective palliative treatment option for patients with unresectable RCC.

Feasibility of drug-eluting embolics chemoembolization for the management of recurrent/advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To characterize the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic (DEE) microspheres in patients with recurrent and advanced head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 32 patients (mean age, 57.2 ± 2.8 years; 17 women) with recurrent (n=16) and advanced (n=16) head and neck cancer were treated with chemoembolization with DEE microspheres loaded with doxorubicin. Treatment response, overall survival, local progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

At six months after the procedure, the objective response and disease control rates were 25% and 69%, respectively. The median overall survival and local progression-free survival were 14.5 and 13.6 months, respectively. Seven patients (22%) experienced adverse events after the chemoembolization procedure. All adverse events were related to post-embolization syndrome, including vomiting and nausea (n=1), pyrexia (n=2) and localized pain (n=7). No severe adverse events or procedure-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

Chemoembolization with DEE microspheres was safe and tolerable in patients with recurrent and advanced head and neck cancer.

Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization With and Without Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Advanced and Standard Treatment-Refractory/Ineligible Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with and without microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of advanced and standard treatment-refractory/ineligible non-small cell lung cancer (ASTRI-NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 77 ASTRI-NSCLC patients who received DEB-BACE combined with MWA (group A; n = 28) or DEB-BACE alone (group B; n = 49) were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to compare the median progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to investigate the predictors of OS for ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Results

No severe adverse event was found in both groups. Pneumothorax was the predominant MWA-related complication in group A, with an incidence rate of 32.1% (9/28). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in DEB-BACE-related complications between groups A and B. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 61.0% (47/77), with a significantly higher DCR in group A (85.7% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.002). The median PFS in groups A and B was 7.0 and 4.0 months, respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0.037). The median OS in groups A and B was both 8.0 months, with no significant difference (P = 0.318). The 6-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 75.0% and 78.6%, 22.4% and 59.2%, respectively, while the 12-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 17.9% and 28.6%, 14.3% and 22.4%, respectively. Of these, a significantly higher 6-month PFS rate was found in group A (75.0% vs. 22.4%; P < 0.001). The cycles of DEB-BACE/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.363; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.202–0.655; P = 0.001] and postoperative immunotherapy (HR: 0.219; 95% CI: 0.085–0.561; P = 0.002) were identified as the predictors of OS in ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Conclusion

MWA sequentially combined with DEB-BACE was superior to DEB-BACE alone in the local control of ASTRI-NSCLC. Although the combination therapy reveals a trend of prolonging the OS, long-term prognosis warrants an investigation with a longer follow-up.

Pirarubicin-loaded CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads for the treatment of patients with stage III-IV lung cancer

BACKGROUND

CalliSpheres® beads (CB) have been used recently for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the safety and effect of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in patients with stage III-IV lung cancer are still unknown.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB for the treatment of stage III-IV lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 2016 to April 2020, 29 patients with stage III-IV primary lung cancer underwent DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB. The objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded (median 60 mg) CB, with no severe adverse events or treatment-related deaths. After DEB-TACE, hemoptysis disappeared within 1-3 days in all patients, and the symptoms of cough or expectoration were significantly improved in 12 patients. ORR and disease control rate at one, three, and six months after DEB-TACE were 39.3% and 96.4%, 26.1% and 69.6%, and 29.4% and 58.8%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.3 months (range 1.1-30.1 months), and the three-, six-, and 12-month PFS rates were 70.2%, 50.1%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median OS was 10.2 months (range 1.1-44.6 months), and the three-, six, and 12-month OS rates were 87.9%, 68.6%, and 39.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE with pirarubicin-loaded CB is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated for patients with stage III-IV lung cancer, and symptom control was a potential benefit of treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus anlotinib oral administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Consecutive data from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected from February 2018 to August 2019. All patients underwent drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) followed by anlotinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, and factors associated with OS and PFS were assessed by a Cox proportional hazards test. Treatment response at 30 days was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT), and then the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–20.2 months), and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.2–10.6 months). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 21.6 and 100%, respectively, at 30 days after the first cycle of treatment. Most of the treatment-related adverse reactions were mild and moderate and included anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Only eight (15.7%) patients developed grade 3 TRAEs. No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Both TNM stage and brain metastasis were independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

Conclusion: DEB-BACE concomitant with anlotinib has promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization improves clinical efficacy and life quality of patients with lung cancer and reduces adverse reactions

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with lung cancer (LC).

METHODS

A total of 513 inpatients with LC admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on different treatment methods, they were assigned into a control group (CG; n=249) for traditional bronchial artery infusion (BAI) and an experimental group (EG; n=264) for TACE, with shared chemotherapy drugs and treatment courses. The two groups were compared with respect to clinical efficacy, pre- and post-treatment pulmonary function, adverse reactions, as well as negative emotions and quality of life (QoL) scores.

RESULTS

The curative effect in EG was far superior to CG (P<0.05). In comparison with CG, the pulmonary function in EG was better and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower after treatment (P<0.05). The negative emotions and the QoL were improved in both groups, with more distinct improvement in EG compared with CG (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With higher safety and efficacy, TACE can improve the clinical efficacy and QoL of patients with LC while relieving bad mood and reducing adverse reactions.

Sintilimab plus Bronchial Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy/Drug-Eluting Embolic Chemoembolization for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Study of 10 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with sintilimab combined with bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) chemotherapy/drug-eluting embolic (DEE) bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with sintilimab plus BAI/DEE-BACE between December 2019 and November 2020 and retrospectively evaluated. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 was applied to evaluate the treatment response. The local tumor control duration, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

At 30 days after the last multimodal treatment, complete response, partial response, and stable disease were recorded in 1 (10%), 7 (70%), and 2 (20%) patients, respectively, for an objective response rate of 80% and a disease control rate of 100%. No patient experienced progressive disease. The median duration of local tumor control was 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.7 months). The median PFS and OS were 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.9-15.1 months) and 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-10.5 months), respectively. Two cases of Grade III adverse events related to medications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Sintilimab combined with BAI/DEE-BACE for patients with advanced NSCLC appears to be safe and feasible. Compared with previous studies on BAI/DEE-BACE, the addition of immunotherapy may improve survival.

Drug-Eluting Beads Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization in Treating Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Results from a Pilot Study

Background

We aimed to explore the efficacy and tolerance of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) treatment in relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

Methods

Eleven relapsed/refractory SCLC patients were enrolled and treated with DEB-BACE. Then, treatment response and tumor marker levels were assessed at the first, second and sixth month post treatment. Quality of life was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated.

Results

At the first, second and sixth month post treatment, the objective response rates were 63.6%, 54.5%, and 36.4%, respectively; and the disease control rates were 90.9%, 90.9% and 54.5%, respectively. In addition, the neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and progastrin-releasing peptide levels were reduced at the second and sixth month. Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, which included subscales of general health status, functional domains, symptom domains, and single domains except for financial difficulty, was markedly improved at second month post treatment. Median values of PFS and OS were 5.1 (95% CI: 4.1–5.9) months and 9.0 (95% CI: 6.0–12.0) months, respectively. The ECOG score and preoperative NSE level were independent predictive factors for PFS, and age as well as lesion location were independent predictive factors for OS. Adverse events were all mild and manageable with chest pain and chest stuffiness the most common ones.

Conclusion

DEB-BACE could be a therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory SCLC patients regarding its favorable treatment response, quality of life, survival benefit and safety profile.

Establishment of a large animal model for research on transbronchial arterial intervention for lung cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate whether bronchial artery can supply a percutaneously inoculated canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT) in a lung tumor model.

METHODS

Fresh CTVT tissue blocks were percutaneously inoculated into unilateral or bilateral lungs of six immunosuppressed dogs at the mid zone of the middle or lower lobe. Tumor growth was monitored by computed tomography (CT). Ten weeks after inoculation, pulmonary arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), bronchial arterial DSA, transpulmonary arterial contrast-enhanced multislice CT, transbronchial arterial contrast-enhanced multislice CT (BA-MSCT), and transpulmonary arterial lipiodol multislice CT were performed.

RESULTS

Tumor growth was seen in all 10 inoculated sites, with a maximum diameter of 2.734±0.138 cm at 10th week. Bronchial arterial blood supply was evident in 9 nodules on DSA, and was equivocal in one which was later demonstrated on BA-MSCT. No obvious pulmonary arterial blood supply was observed in any of the nodules. Lipiodol deposition was displayed in two of the small distant metastases, which indicated that pulmonary artery was involved in the supply of the metastases.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated bronchial arterial blood supply in this new lung cancer model. This model may be used in further research on transbronchial arterial intervention for lung cancer.

Transarterial management of advance lung cancer

Previous reports on transarterial treatment for lung cancer were reviewed. The bronchial arterial infusion therapy has a long history since 1964. Better local control with less doses of anti-neoplastic agents was warranted by trying transarterial administration to lung and mediastinal tumors. It is reported that both primary and metastatic tumors are fed by bronchial or other systemic arteries. The bronchial arterial embolization for hemoptysis has been introduced for clinical practice since 1973. Hemoptysis by not only benign but also malignant diseases has been well controlled by embolization. In recent decades, the technical elements for transarterial treatments have markedly improved. They make it possible to carry out precise procedures of selective catheter insertion to the tumor relating arteries. Current concepts of transarterial treatment, technical aspects and treatment outcomes are summarized. Tentative result from chemo-embolization for advanced lung cancer using recent catheter techniques was also described. It provides favorable local control and survival merits. It is considered that a population of lung cancer patients can benefit from transarterial management using small doses of anti-neoplastic agents, with less complications and less medical costs.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in treating non-small cell lung cancer patients with refractory malignant pleural effusion

Background

The study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with refractory malignant pleural effusion (MPE).

Methods

17 NSCLC patients with refractory MPE treated by DEB-BACE plus the intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy (DEB-BACE group) were recruited. Their treatment response [complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), overall efficacy, failure] for MPE was assessed at 1 month after therapy; adverse effects were recorded; MPE progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Moreover, 19 NSCLC patients with refractory MPE treated by conventional chemotherapy were reviewed as control (chemotherapy group), then their medical records were collected.

Results

With respect to MPE response, DEB-BACE group exhibited increased CR (82.4% vs. 10.5%, P<0.001) and overall efficacy (100.0% vs. 52.6%, P=0.001), similar PR (17.6% vs. 42.1%, P=0.112) while less failure (0.0% vs. 47.4%, P=0.001) compared to chemotherapy group. Furthermore, OS was prolonged in DEB-BACE group (median: 13.4; 95% CI: 11.0–15.8 months) than chemotherapy group (median: 7.0; 95% CI: 4.4–9.6 months) (P=0.002). Further analyses displayed that in DEB-BACE group, CR was associated with improved ECOG score and longer MPE progression-free survival, and adverse events mainly included fever, chest distress/pain, gastrointestinal side effects, myelosuppression, rash and hemoptysis, which were all mild and tolerable.

Conclusions

DEB-BACE plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy could serve as a salvage treatment option for NSCLC patients with refractory MPE.

Efficacy and Safety of 8 spheres Plus Cisplatin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between 8 spheres plus bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) cisplatin and intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin as third-line treatments in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and Methods: Totally, 56 locally advanced NSCLC patients with second-line chemotherapy failure were recruited. Then, 28 patients received 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin treatment, and another 28 patients received intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin treatment. Results: In general, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin increased objective response rate (57.2% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.002) and disease control rate (78.6% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.003) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin; meanwhile, it also elevated quality of life (QOL) score (46.7 ± 7.1 vs. 41.5 ± 5.2, p = 0.003) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin. Furthermore, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median [95% confidence interval, CI]: 7.9 [6.3-9.5] months vs. 4.3 [3.5-5.1] months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median [95% CI]: 14.6 [11.0-18.2] months vs. 10.5 [10.2-10.8] months, p = 0.029) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin, which was further supported by multivariate Cox's regression analysis (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.007). In addition, subgroup analyses revealed that 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin markedly elevated treatment response, QOL, and survival compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin in squamous cell carcinoma patients, but not in adenomatous carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma patients. Regarding safety, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin exhibited lower rates of gastrointestinal tract complication (p < 0.001) and myelosuppression (p < 0.001) than intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin. Conclusions: 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin displays good efficacy and well-tolerated safety profiles in locally advanced NSCLC patients with second-line chemotherapy failure.

Survival Benefit of Radiofrequency Ablation with Intratumoral Cisplatin Administration in a Rabbit VX2 Lung Tumor Model

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the survival benefit of a combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and intratumoral cisplatin (ITC) administration for lung tumors by using a rabbit VX2 tumor model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiments were approved by the institutional animal care committee. VX2 tumor suspension was injected into the lungs of Japanese white rabbits under CT guidance to create a lung tumor model. Thirty-two rabbits bearing a transplanted VX2 lung tumor were randomly assigned to four groups of eight: control (untreated); RFA alone; ITC alone; and RFA with ITC. All treatments were performed one week after tumor transplantation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 24.5 days (range 17-33 days) in the control group, 40 days (30-80 days) in the RFA alone group, 31.0 days (24-80 days) in the ITC alone group, and not reached (53-80 days) in the RFA with ITC group. The median survival was significantly longer with the RFA/ITC combination compared to the control group (P < 0.001), RFA alone (P = 0.034), and ITC alone (P = 0.004). The survival time after RFA alone was also significantly longer than that of the control group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in tumor size or the rate of pneumothorax between each group.

CONCLUSION

RFA prolonged the survival of rabbits with lung VX2 tumors when combined with ITC.

Clinical effect of bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy and CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

CalliSpheres are drug-eluting beads used for tumor artery embolization, with clinical benefits in a number of cancer types. The aim of the study was to examine the clinical benefits and complications of patients with stage II-IV lung cancer treated with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for embolization versus conventional vascular interventional treatment.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted from August 2018 to May 2019. The patients were grouped according to traditional bronchial arterial infusion chemotherapy (infusion group) or bronchial arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads loaded with adriamycin (CallisSphere group). Short-term effects, serum tumor markers, and adverse reactions during follow-up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 60 participants enrolled into the study with 30 in each group including 54 men and six women, 42-78 years of age. In the CalliSphere group, compared with the infusion group, the disease control rate was 93.3% versus 73.3% (P = 0.080) and the objective remission rate (ORR) was 86.7% versus 60.0% (P = 0.039); the three- and six-month progression-free survival (PFS) and six-month overall survival (OS) were better in the CalliSphere group (three-month PFS: 96.7% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.026; six-month PFS: 87.5% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.045; six-month OS: 87.5% vs. 52.7%, P = 0.024); after treatment, the tumor markers in the CalliSphere group were lower (CEA: P < 0.001; CYFRA21-1: P = 0.014). There were no differences in adverse reactions between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage IIIV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The clinical effect of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads on lung cancer is probably significant and could improve the short-term response, PFS, and OS in patients with stage II-IV lung cancer, without increasing severe adverse reactions.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

The ORR, PFS, OS was better in the CalliSphere group than that of infusion group; CEA and CYFRA21-1 were significant lower in CalliSphere group.

Transcatheter drug delivery through bronchial artery for COVID-19: is it fiction or could it come true?

More than 1,200 active or recruiting clinical trials for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments and vaccines are registered. Many drugs have shown promise for treatment of COVID-19. Nevertheless, up to date, no drugs have been confirmed as a definitive treatment for COVID-19. Trials such as the SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY are ongoing, and first results were announced in favour of therapy with dexamethasone with a significant trend showing greatest benefit among those patients requiring ventilation. The drawbacks of these trials include exposing the patients to drugs with well-documented systemic adverse effects or unknown complications of novel therapies without proof of clinical benefit. We present here the hypothesis that bronchial artery infusion could be an alternative for systemic drug infusion in COVID-19 trials with superadded benefits of high drug concentration and low systemic adverse effects. The concept of this idea has many uncertainties and no current clinical data to support. Perhaps, the technique should be first applied in animal models to determine its safety and calculate the effective dose of the drugs. Guidelines and reviews of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 should be implemented for this fiction to come true.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization as a neoadjuvant treatment for squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: The treatment for locally advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer is still challenging. Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) is a novel drug delivery and embolization system for lung cancer that has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce the incidence of adverse events (AEs). It is very rare to administer DEB-BACE as neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer and achieve pathological complete response (pCR). Body: A 69-year-old male was hospitalized because of cough and hemoptysis caused by locally advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer. According to his choice, he received DEB-BACE treatment without obvious AEs. After the DEB-BACE treatment, the pulmonary lesion was controlled and lobectomy was performed. Postoperative pathology showed pCR. The patient has recovered well. Conclusion: This was the first case of DEB-BACE as a neoadjuvant therapy and achieved pCR for lung cancer. DEB-BACE might be a new neoadjuvant therapy option for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, especially for squamous cell cancer.