Diagnostic yield of additional conventional transbronchial lung biopsy following radial endobronchial ultrasound lung biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

Advanced Bronchoscopic Diagnostic Techniques in Lung Cancer

The increasing incidence of incidental pulmonary nodules necessitates effective biopsy techniques for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This paper reviews the widely used advanced bronchoscopic techniques, such as radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, and the cutting-edge robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. In addition, the cryobiopsy technique, which can enhance diagnostic yield by combination with conventional biopsy tools, is described for application to peripheral pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lesions, respectively.

Diagnostic utility of adding needle aspiration (using PeriView FLEX needle) to radial endobronchial ultrasound guide sheath transbronchial lung biopsy: a single center retrospective study

Background

Radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) guide sheath (GS) transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral lung lesions (PLL). However, its diagnostic yield is approximately 60%. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of adding rEBUS GS transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) using PeriView FLEX needle (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to rEBUS GS TBLB.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we initially screened 124 PLLs in 123 patients who underwent rEBUS GS procedures for PLLs from December 2020 to August 2021. The analysis was performed on 74 PLLs in 73 patients who underwent both rEBUS GS TBLB and TBNA.

Results

PLLs showed the following characteristics: lesion size [mean ± standard deviation (SD)], 24±12 mm; nature (solid vs. subsolid), 59 (79.7%) vs. 15 (20.3%); distance from the pleura (mean ± SD), 14±14 mm; rEBUS visualization type (probe within PLL vs. probe adjacent to PLL), 56 (75.7%) vs. 18 (24.3%). Among 74 PLLs, 47 (63.5%) were successfully diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBLB. In 27 PLLs not diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBLB, 5 (18.5%) were further diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBNA [overall diagnostic yield: 70.3% (52/74)]. EBUS visualization type of "probe adjacent to PLL" was a significant factor associated with the diagnostic yield of additional rEBUS GS TBNA.

Conclusions

In rEBUS GS procedures for PLLs, the diagnostic yield might be improved by implementing TBNA in addition to TBLB. In particular, additional TBNA is preferable if the probe is adjacent to the lesion rather than within the lesion on rEBUS.

[4D electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules - An overview and preliminary clinical results]

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPN) is a particular challenge in interventional bronchology, which is why navigation systems such as electromagnetic navigation (ENB) are increasingly being used. The 4D-ENB represents the most current development of the ENB. It utilizes inspiratory and expiratory CT scans for mapping and thus helps compensate for respiratory movements-induced CT-to-body divergence. The aim of this work was to present the first clinical data and experiences using the 4D-ENB method for diagnosis of PPNs.

METHODS

We retrospectively describe the results of the first nine consecutive patient cases diagnosed at Klinikum Braunschweig using 4D-ENB in a unimodal diagnostic procedure.

RESULTS

Of the first 9 PPNs examined by 4D-ENB, navigation and puncture of the lesion was successful in 8 patients (89%). Diagnostic biopsy was could be carried out in six out of nine patients (67%). There were no significant procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data suggest that 4D-ENB is a promising new alternative for the diagnosis of PPNs. To further improve diagnostic yield, 4D-END, which lacks real-time visualization, should be embedded in a multimodal diagnostic procedure with rEBUS and/or fluoroscopy.

Endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath during bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

INTRODUCTION

Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). A notable methodological limitation of rEBUS is that it does not provide real-time images during transbronchial biopsy (TBB) procedures. To overcome this limitation, a guide sheath (GS) method was developed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the procedures and complications of rEBUS-guided TBB with a GS (EGS method). We also present the data from key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the EGS method and summarize the usefulness of combining the EGS method with various techniques. Finally, we discuss in which situations EGS should be used.

EXPERT OPINION

A large RCT showed that the diagnostic yield of the EGS method for PPLs was significantly higher than that of rEBUS-guided TBB without a GS (non-GS method). However, since the EGS and non-GS methods each have their own advantages and disadvantages, they should be considered complementary and used flexibly in different cases. In some cases, a combination of the two may be an option. The appropriate combination of EGS with various techniques may enhance the diagnostic yield of PPLs and help prevent complications. The choice should be based on the location and texture of the target lesion, as well as operator skill, resource availability, safety, and accuracy.

Cone-beam computed tomography-guided endobronchial ultrasound using an ultrathin bronchoscope for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a prospective pilot study

Background

Multimodal transbronchial biopsy (TBB) may have improved diagnostic yield for peripheral pulmonary lesions suspected as lung cancer. Radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) provides real-time imaging and confirmation of the location of the lesions. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can confirm that the forceps tip has reached the lesion before biopsy.

Methods

Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions and a positive computed tomography (CT) bronchus sign (based on slice thickness of 1 mm) were prospectively enrolled. An ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB) and R-EBUS probe were advanced to the target bronchus. Thereafter, forceps were advanced, and CBCT was performed. R-EBUS was performed for re-navigation, if possible. The obtained EBUS and CBCT images were classified into "within" (type 1), "adjacent to" (type 2), or "far from" (type 3), based on the probe or forceps tip.

Results

For 20 lesions, the diagnostic yield was 85%. The primary EBUS images were of types 1, 2, and 3 in 12, 6, and 2 cases, respectively. The primary CBCT images were of types 1, 2, and 3 in 12, 6, and 2 cases, respectively. Primary EBUS and CBCT image types were equivalent in 14 cases. Of the 12 cases with type 1 primary EBUS image, 9 cases had a type 1 primary CBCT image, while 3 cases exhibited positional misalignment of the forceps tip. Re-navigation was required in 8 cases with types 2 and 3 primary CBCT images.

Conclusions

CBCT-guided TBB using an UTB and EBUS may enable real-time positioning guidance and better re-navigation in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Value of adding ultrathin bronchoscopy to thin bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic yield of thin bronchoscopy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) of peripheral pulmonary lesions into which the rEBUS probe cannot be inserted is unsatisfactory. In such cases, adding ultrathin bronchoscopy may be an option. We evaluated the efficacy of sequential ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions into which the rEBUS probe could not be inserted during thin bronchoscopy.

METHODS

In this multicentre prospective study, patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions ≤30 mm in diameter underwent rEBUS-guided transbronchial biopsy using a 4.0 mm diameter thin bronchoscope. In patients with lesions into which a rEBUS probe could not be inserted using that bronchoscope, bronchoscopy using a 3.0 mm diameter ultrathin bronchoscope was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 342 patients were enrolled and 340 were analysed. Among them, 87 patients with lesions of a median longest diameter of 17.5 mm underwent thin bronchoscopy followed by ultrathin bronchoscopy. Of the 87 patients, the rEBUS probe was successfully inserted into the lesions via the ultrathin bronchoscope in 50 patients (57.5%). Of the 87 patients, the diagnostic yields of thin bronchoscopy and ultrathin bronchoscopy were 12.6% (11 of 87) and 41.4% (36 of 87), respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrathin bronchoscopy affords a higher diagnostic yield for lesions into which a rEBUS probe cannot be inserted via a thin bronchoscope.

Factors related to the diagnosis of lung cancer by transbronchial biopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography and a guide sheath

BACKGROUND

Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography and a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is an effective examination tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Factors related to making the diagnosis are still not fully understood.

METHODS

A total of 367 patients who underwent EBUS-GS and were diagnosed with lung cancer in Saga University Hospital were investigated retrospectively. Clinical characteristics were compared between 244 patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer and 123 patients who were not diagnosed by TBB with EBUS-GS but were diagnosed by other examinations.

RESULTS

Size of target lesion, rate of patients with target lesion size ≥20 mm, presence of the bronchus sign, and detection by EBUS imaging were significantly associated with making the diagnosis (all p < 0.01). In patients whose lesion was detected by EBUS imaging, patients with positive findings within the lesion were significantly more often diagnosed by TBB with EBUS-GS than those with positive findings adjacent to the lesion (p < 0.01). The odds ratio (OR) of patients whose lesion was detected by EBUS imaging (OR [95% confidence interval] 14.5 [8.0-26.4]) tended to be higher compared to the ORs of size of lesion ≥20 mm (3.9 [2.2-6.8]) and the bronchus sign (7.5 [4.6-12.2]).

CONCLUSION

Targeted lesion diameter ≥20 mm, bronchus sign, and detection by EBUS imaging, especially within the lesion, are important factors for the diagnosis of lung cancer by TBB with EBUS-GS.

Virtual bronchoscopic navigation and endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath without fluoroscopy for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions with a bronchus leading to or adjacent to the lesion: A randomized non‐inferiority trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Transbronchial sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is routinely performed under fluoroscopy. However, advanced ancillary techniques have become available, such as virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and radial endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath (rEBUS-GS). This study was performed to determine whether the diagnostic utility of VBN and rEBUS with a GS is similar with or without fluoroscopy.

METHODS

This multicenter non-inferiority trial randomized patients to a VBN-rEBUS-GS with or without fluoroscopy group at three centres. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints were the time for rEBUS, GS, and the total operation. Complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety-six subjects were assessed and 426 subjects were included in the analysis (212 in non-fluoroscopy-guided-group and 214 in fluoroscopy-guided-group). The diagnostic yield in the non-fluoroscopy-guided-group (84.0%) was not inferior to that in the fluoroscopy-guided-group (84.6%), with a diagnostic difference of -0.6% (95% CI: -6.4%, 5.2%). Multivariable analysis confirmed that bronchus sign and lesion nature were valuable diagnostic predictors in non-fluoroscopy-guided-group. The non-fluoroscopy-guided-group had shorter rEBUS, GS, and total operation time. No severe complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Transbronchial diagnosis of PPLs suspicious of malignancy and presence of a bronchus leading to or adjacent to lesions using VBN-rEBUS-GS without fluoroscopy is a safe and effective method that is non-inferior to VBN-rEBUS-GS with fluoroscopy. Bronchus leading to lesions and malignant nature are associated with high diagnostic yield in VBN-rEBUS-GS without fluoroscopy for the diagnosis of PPLs.

Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology to analyze multiple genes and to guide targeted therapy. Although the pathological diagnosis and biomarker tests for patients with advanced lung cancer have mostly been obtained with small biopsy samples, especially with bronchoscopic approaches, the performance for NGS with respect to the different sizes of biopsy forceps remains little known.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer, whose FFPE samples were obtained by endobronchial biopsy/transbronchial biopsy and were submitted for the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT). We compared the analytical performance for ODxTT with respect to the size of biopsy forceps.

RESULTS

A total of 103 samples were identified. The success rate of the ODxTT for the group with all samples obtained with small forceps biopsies (70%) was lower than that of the group with some or all samples obtained with standard forceps biopsies (83%), although without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.20). With regard to the reason for unsuccessful analysis, the proportion of the samples which did not pass the nucleic acid concentration threshold in the former group (15%) was higher compared with that of the latter group (4%) (p = 0.08). The proportion of tissue size 4 mm² or larger in the former group (70%) was lower than that in the latter group (93%) (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The analysis of ODxTT for specimens biopsied using only small forceps is prone to be unsuccessful due to an insufficient amount of nucleic acid.

Comparison of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy with distance measurement versus with guide sheath in diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions with a diameter ≥3 cm by thin bronchoscope

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to explore the diagnostic values of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy with distance (rEBUS-D-TBLB) measurement and with guide sheath (rEBUS-GS-TBLB) for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with a diameter ≥3 cm by thin bronchoscope.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Six hundred and three patients with PPL (diameter ≥3 cm) were enrolled in this study. The subjects were divided into the rEBUS-D-TBLB and rEBUS-GS-TBLB groups by the random number table method. Patients were assigned to undergo rEBUS-D-TBLB or rEBUS-GS-TBLB, respectively. The histopathology, positive diagnosis rates, duration of the procedure, and postoperative adverse effects between the two groups were examined.

RESULTS:

A total of 569 patients were included in this study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 282 cases in the rEBUS-D-TBLB group and 287 cases in the rEBUS-GS-TBLB group. For malignant diseases, the positive diagnosis rates of PPL in the outer/inner-middle lung bands and the right-upper/-lower lung lobes by rEBUS-D-TBLB were noninferior to those of rEBUS-GS-TBLB. The duration of the procedure of rEBUS-D-TBLB was longer than that of rEBUS-GS-TBLB. There were 14 cases of hemorrhage >50 mL, 1 case of postoperative chest pain in the rEBUS-D-TBLB group, and 3 cases of hemorrhage >50 mL in the rEBUS-GS-TBLB group.

CONCLUSION:

REBUS-D-TBLB by thin bronchoscope has a high diagnostic value for PPL with a diameter ≥3 cm, which may be considered a useful alternative for rEBUS-GS-TBLB in the clinic.

Optical coherence tomography for identification of malignant pulmonary nodules based on random forest machine learning algorithm

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of using random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm in assessing normal and malignant peripheral pulmonary nodules based on in vivo endobronchial optical coherence tomography (EB-OCT).

METHODS

A total of 31 patients with pulmonary nodules were admitted to Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, and underwent chest CT, EB-OCT and biopsy. Attenuation coefficient and up to 56 different image features were extracted from A-line and B-scan of 1703 EB-OCT images. Attenuation coefficient and 29 image features with significant p-values were used to analyze the differences between normal and malignant samples. A RF classifier was trained using 70% images as training set, while 30% images were included in the testing set. The accuracy of the automated classification was validated by clinically proven pathological results.

RESULTS

Attenuation coefficient and 29 image features were found to present different properties with significant p-values between normal and malignant EB-OCT images. The RF algorithm successfully classified the malignant pulmonary nodules with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90.41%, 77.87% and 83.51% respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is clinically practical to distinguish the nature of pulmonary nodules by integrating EB-OCT imaging with automated machine learning algorithm. Diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules by analyzing quantitative features from EB-OCT images could be a potentially powerful way for early detection of lung cancer.

Guide sheath versus non-guide sheath method for endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A multicenter randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Guide sheaths (GSs) have been widely used during radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (rEBUS-TBB) of peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, it remains unknown whether a GS enhances the diagnostic yield. We compared the diagnostic yields of small peripheral pulmonary lesions between rEBUS-TBB with and without a GS.

METHODS

In eight institutions, patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions≤30 mm in diameter were enrolled and randomized to undergo rEBUS-TBB with a GS (GS group) or without a GS (non-GS group) using a 4.0-mm thin bronchoscope, virtual bronchoscopic navigation, and fluoroscopy. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of the histology specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 605 patients were enrolled; ultimately, data on 596 (300 in the GS group and 296 in the non-GS group) with peripheral pulmonary lesions having a longest median diameter of 19.6 mm were analyzed. The diagnostic yield of histological specimens from the GS group was significantly higher than that from the non-GS group (55.3% versus 46.6%, respectively; p=0.033). Interactions were evident between the diagnostic yields, procedures, lobar locations (upper lobe versus other regions, p=0.003), and lesion texture (solid versus part-solid nodules, p=0.072).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield for small peripheral pulmonary lesions afforded by rEBUS-TBB using a GS was higher than that without a GS.

Utility of Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Lung Biopsy in Bronchus Sign Negative Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

BACKGROUND

The presence of the bronchus sign on chest computed tomography is associated with an increased diagnostic yield of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (RP-EBUS-TBLB). However, the utility of RP-EBUS-TBLB for bronchus sign negative peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains unknown. We investigated the utility of RP-EBUS-TBLB in bronchus sign negative PPLs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 109 patients who underwent RP-EBUS for bronchus sign negative PPLs from January 2019 to August 2020. TBLB was performed using RP-EBUS with a guide sheath and without fluoroscopy. The EBUS visualization and TBLB diagnostic yields were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the EBUS visualization and diagnostic yields.

RESULTS

The EBUS visualization yield was 74.1% (68/109). Of the 109 lung lesions, 92 were definitively diagnosed. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 50.5% (55/109), 34.9% (29/83), 100% (26/26), 100% (29/29), and 32.5% (26/80), respectively. In multivariable analyses, the size of the lesion (≥ 20 mm; odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-5.93; P = 0.021) and the distance from the pleura (> 10 mm; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.02-5.52; P = 0.045) were associated with EBUS visualization. Regarding diagnostic yield, having the probe within the lesion (OR, 28.50; 95% CI, 6.26-129.85; P < 0.001) and a solid lesion (OR, 14.58; 95% CI, 2.64-80.38; P = 0.002) were associated with diagnostic success. Pneumothorax and hemoptysis occurred in 3.7% (4/109) and 0.9% (1/109), respectively, of the patients.

CONCLUSION

RP-EBUS-TBLB using a GS can be considered a diagnostic method in bronchus sign negative solid PPLs. Having the probe within the lesion and a solid lesion were important for diagnostic success. Complication rates were acceptable.

Ultrathin bronchoscope combined with virtual bronchoscopic navigation and endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions with or without fluoroscopy: A randomized trial

Background

Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is usually performed to obtain a definitive diagnosis for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and radial endobronchial ultrasound (R‐EBUS) are generally considered appropriate diagnostic methods for PPLs; however, they have not yet been explored in combination with fluoroscopy. Therefore, the present prospective randomized controlled trial determined the role of fluoroscopy in ultrathin bronchoscopy combined with VBN and R‐EBUS for the diagnosis of PPLs.

Methods

Patients with potentially malignant PPLs were enrolled in the study and randomized into fluoroscopy or nonfluoroscopy groups. In both groups, a 3.0‐mm outer and 1.7‐mm internal diameter ultrathin bronchoscope was used for transbronchial lung biopsy combined with R‐EBUS and VBN. In addition, the fluoroscopy group (FG) underwent fluoroscopy, while the nonfluoroscopy group (NFG) did not.

Results

A total of 126 patients were enrolled and randomized in the study. Among them, 120 patients (60 in the NFG and 60 in the FG) were analyzed. The mean lesion sizes were 26.3 ± 11.4 mm and 29.0 ± 11.3 mm in the NFG and FG, respectively. The diagnostic yield was 73.3% (44/60) in the NFG and 81.7% (49/60) in the FG without statistically significant difference (p = 0.38). No obvious complications occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Ultrathin bronchoscope combined with VBN and R‐EBUS without fluoroscopy is a feasible and safe diagnostic method for PPLs.

Systemic Air Embolism Complicating Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Transthoracic Biopsy of Cavitary Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Cavitary lung lesions often pose a diagnostic challenge, and tissue sampling can be required to obtain a confident diagnosis. Many authors contend that a computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) of a cavitary lung lesion places a patient at higher risk for systemic air embolism (SAE) compared with biopsy of a noncavitary lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature for studies of SAE complicating PTLB. We searched English-language articles indexed through PubMed, Embase, and Ovid Medline and included articles published up to March 31, 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 10 case reports of SAE complicating PTLB, and 3 case-cohort studies comparing cavitary and noncavitary lesion biopsy. Among the case-cohort studies reviewed, 4 SAE occurred among 145 biopsies of cavitary lesions (2.7%), and 65 SAE occurred among 3050 biopsies of noncavitary lesions (2.1%). The pooled odds ratio of PTLB complicating SAE of cavitary lesions compared with noncavitary lesions was 1.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-3.60). No deaths following SAE after computed tomography-guided PTLB of cavitary lesions were reported in recent literature.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of available evidence, air embolism rates are similar for PTLB of cavitary and noncavitary lesions. Additional research and registry studies are necessary to better understand this topic.