Prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index among patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer who subsequently underwent immunotherapy

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as Prognostic Marker for Elderly Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background/Aim

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) indicates nutritional status based on serum albumin concentration and ideal body weight. Pretreatment GNRI has been suggested as a prognostic factor for various malignancies. However, little is known about the clinical value of GNRI for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), especially in elderly patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 53 elderly (≥71) patients with extensive-disease (ED) SCLC treated with first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy in relation to the pretreatment GNRI level in a real-world setting.

Results

Thirty-six patients with a low GNRI (<92) had statistically poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than 17 patients with a high GNRI (≥92) (median PFS=80 days vs. 133 days, respectively; p=0.002; median OS=123 days vs. 274 days, respectively; p=0.004). In a multivariate analysis, a low GNRI was also an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.396; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.199-0.789; p=0.008] and OS (HR=0.295; 95%CI=0.143-0.608; p<0.001).

Conclusion

The GNRI might be a predictive and prognostic marker in elderly patients with ED-SCLC treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy.

Association of Nutritional Indices With Adverse Effects and Time-to-Treatment-Failure in Triple Therapy for Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recent lung cancer treatments include an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab, platinum-based agents, plus an additional cytotoxic anticancer agent. Nutritional indices, such as the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), are known to correlate with the prognosis of cancer chemotherapy. Several previous studies have investigated the relationship between PNI and treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer patients, reporting significantly increased OS and PFS in the high PNI group before treatment. However, the relationship between the three-drug combination and GNRI/PNI is unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the association of nutritional indices with duration of treatment success and occurrence of side effects in triple therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-two patients with non-small cell lung cancer, treated with combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab from November 2019 to September 30, 2022, were classified into two groups (High and Low) for GNRI and PNI, and a retrospective study was performed.

RESULTS

In terms of time-to-treatment-failure (TTF), univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed the Low-PNI group to have significantly shorter TTF than the High-PNI group (p=0.006); multivariate analysis results also showed PNI as a factor affecting TTF (HR=2.791, 95%CI=1.362-5.721, p=0.005). On the other hand, GNRI was not shown to be a factor affecting TTF.

CONCLUSION

PNI at the start of treatment was an independent prognostic factor affecting treatment success time (TTF) in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving triple therapy. However, PNI was not shown to be a prognostic predictor of irAE development.

Association of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment Duration and Adverse Events in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Compared to conventional cytotoxic anticancer agent-based therapy, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) significantly prolongs overall survival. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been used as a new prognostic indicator in cancer. As nutritional status is associated with prognosis and indicates treatment response, we investigated the effect of the pretreatment GNRI on the (1) occurrence of ICI-induced immune-related adverse events (ir-AE) and (2) association with time to treatment failure (TTF) in ICI monotherapy for lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, 127 patients with lung cancer who were treated with ICI monotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Based on a cutoff value of 92 for the GNRI, we investigated intergroup differences in the occurrence of adverse events and their association with TTF in the High-GNRI (≥92) and Low-GNRI (<92) groups. For intergroup comparisons, we used the Student's t-test, Welch's t-test, Fisher's direct probability test, and Mann-Whitney's U-test, and factors with p<0.05 in the intergroup comparison were extracted as explanatory variables.

RESULTS

Based on the pretreatment GNRI, the median TTF was 5.1 months (95%CI=2.4-7.9 months) in the High-GNRI group and 2.3 months (95%CI=1.6-3.1 months) in the Low-GNRI group, with the High-GNRI group having a significantly longer TTF (p<0.01). The incidence of skin rash (p=0.0129) and pruritus (p<0.01) was significantly higher in the High-GNRI group.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment GNRI influences the continuation of ICI monotherapy. The High-GNRI group demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of skin lesions, which may have influenced the prolongation of TTF.

Hepatocellular carcinoma immune prognosis score predicts the clinical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

The predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still need to be further explored. This study aims to establish a new immune prognosis biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 151 HCC patients receiving ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021. This study collected a wide range of blood parameters from patients before treatment and used Cox's regression analysis to identify independent prognostic factors in blood parameters, as well as their β coefficient. The hepatocellular carcinoma immune prognosis score (HCIPS) was established through Lasso regression analysis and COX multivariate analysis. The cut-off value of HCIPS was calculated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Finally, the prognostic value of HCIPS was validated through survival analysis, stratified analyses, and nomograms.

RESULTS

HCIPS was composed of albumin (ALB) and thrombin time (TT), with a cut-off value of 0.64. There were 56 patients with HCIPS < 0.64 and 95 patients with HCIPS ≥ 0.64, patients with low HCIPS were significantly related to shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (13.10 months vs. 1.63 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (14.83 months vs. 25.43 months, P < 0.001). HCIPS has also been found to be an independent prognostic factor in this study. In addition, the stratified analysis found a significant correlation between low HCIPS and shorter OS in patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm (P of interaction = 0.032). The C-index and 95% CI of the nomograms for PFS and OS were 0.730 (0.680-0.779) and 0.758 (0.711-0.804), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As a new score established based on HCC patients receiving ICIs, HCIPS was significantly correlated with clinical outcomes in patients with ICIs and might serve as a new biomarker to predict HCC patients who cloud benefit from ICIs.

Low geriatric nutritional risk index as a poor prognostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in solid cancer

Objective

In this investigation, we focused on the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), a comprehensive metric that takes into account the patient's ideal weight, actual weight, and serum albumin levels to measure malnutrition. Our primary objective was to examine the predictive value of GNRI-defined malnutrition in determining the response to immunotherapy among cancer patients.

Methods

Relevant articles for this study were systematically searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar up to July 2023. Our analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) as clinical outcomes.

Results

This analysis comprised a total of eleven articles encompassing 1,417 patients. The pooled results revealed that cancer patients with low GNRI levels exhibited shorter OS (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 2.08-3.36, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.46-2.41, p < 0.001), and lower ORR (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.65, p < 0.001) and DCR (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.29-0.61, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the above results were stable. Egger's and Begg's tests revealed that there was no publication bias in the above results.

Conclusion

Our results imply that the GNRI is a useful predictor of immunotherapy response in cancer patients.

Prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a new treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, further evaluation is needed for determining biomarkers for the use of ICIs. The present study evaluated the prognostic value of certain nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with HCC who received ICIs. In the present study, the clinical data of 151 patients with HCC who received ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were collected. The blood parameters of all patients before treatment were collected to evaluate certain nutritional and inflammatory markers, including the prognostic nutrition index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), geriatric NRI (GNRI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI). Patients were grouped using the cut-off value calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the relationship between these biomarkers and prognosis was evaluated through survival analysis. Furthermore, the prognostic value of these biomarkers was assessed through multivariate Cox regression analysis and construction of nomograms. Finally, time-ROC curves were plotted to compare the differences in predicting prognosis between the biomarkers. In the preliminary survival analysis, all inflammatory and nutritional markers included in the present study were significantly associated with the prognosis of HCC in patients who received ICIs. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that GNRI, PNI, BCLC stage and Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), whereas GNRI, BCLC stage and TNM stage were also significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the time-ROC curves indicated that nutritional indicators had a higher prognostic value in all indexes, especially GNRI. The C-index (95% confidence interval) of the nomograms for predicting the survival probability of patients who received ICIs were 0.801 (0.746-0.877) and 0.823 (0.761-0.898) for PFS and overall OS, respectively, which also showed high accuracy. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that PNI, GNRI, NRI, SII, SIRI and ALI were all related to the efficacy of ICIs in HCC and could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for ICI treatment effectiveness. Moreover, compared with inflammatory markers, nutritional markers had greater predictive ability, with GNRI being the biomarker with the best prognostic value.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) as a Prognostic Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

Malnutrition is a frequent comorbidity in head and neck cancer patients and has been shown to impair immunotherapy response in other cancer types. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) assesses malnutrition using the patient's ideal weight, actual weight, and serum albumin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of malnutrition as determined by the GNRI for the response to immunotherapy in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). A total of 162 patients with R/M HNSCC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors were included. The associations between the GNRI and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the disease control rate (DCR) were computed. Univariable analysis showed worse PFS for GNRI ≤ 98 (p < 0.001), ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (p = 0.012), and enteral (p = 0.009) and parenteral (p = 0.015) nutritional supplementation, and worse OS for GNRI < 92 (p < 0.001), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (p < 0.001), and enteral (p = 0.008) and parenteral (p = 0.023) nutritional supplementation. In our multivariable model, GNRI ≤ 98 (p = 0.012) and ECOG PS ≥ 2 (p = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, GNRI < 92 (p < 0.001) and ECOG PS ≥ 2 (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. A GNRI ≤ 98 was significantly associated with a lower DCR compared to a GNRI > 98 (p = 0.001). In conclusion, our findings suggest that the GNRI may be an effective predictor for response to immunotherapy in R/M HNSCC.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective study

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) has been shown to be associated with the prognosis of cancer patients except for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Our aim is to examine the association between the GNRI and long-term prognosis in patients with HCC who underwent TACE. Patients with HCC who underwent TACE were enrolled. The relationship between the patient characteristics and GNRI were compared, and the independent prognostic factors were investigated. Nomogram performance was assessed via the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the net benefit of the nomogram. A total of 235 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the parameters of the high GNRI group, low GNRI was significantly associated with hypertension, ascites, body mass index, tumor size, anemia, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. The univariate analysis demonstrated that overall survival (OS) was inferior when GNRI < 98, tumor size ≥ 5cm, vascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400, Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage B to C and TACE times < 3. The multivariate analysis revealed that GNRI < 98, tumor size ≥ 5cm, tumor number ≥ 2, alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400 and TACE times < 3 were independent predictors of a poor OS. In the validation step, OS was shown to be well calibrated (C-index = 0.724), and a satisfactory clinical utility was proven by DCA. Low GNRI score was associated with a shorter OS in patients undergoing TACE.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Prognostic Factor of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), a newly developed indicator of nutritional status retrieved by serum albumin concentration and ideal body weight, has been suggested as a prognostic factor for various malignancies. The aim of the study was to summarize the prognostic role of GNRI for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a meta-analysis. Cohort studies evaluating the relationship between GNRI at baseline and survival OF NSCLC were retrieved by search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to January 12, 2022. A conservative random-effect model incorporating the possible influence of between-study heterogeneity was used to pool the results. Eleven cohorts including 2865 patients with NSCLC were included. Compared to those with higher GNRI, NSCLC patients with lower GNRI were associated with poorer overall survival [OS, hazard ratio (HR): 2.39, 95% CI: 1.97-2.91, p<0.001; I2=29%), progression-free survival (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.52-2.47, p<0.001; I2=29%), and cancer-specific survival (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.55-4.35, p<0.001; I2=0%). Subgroup analyses showed that the significant association between lower GNRI and worse OS in patients with NSCLC was not affected by study characteristics including study location, design, cancer stage, treatment, or follow-up durations (p for subgroup effects all<0.001). In conclusion, a lower GNRI in patients with NSCLC may be a predictor of poor survival. Nutritional status indicated by GNRI may be important for the prognostic prediction of patients with NSCLC.

Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to quantitatively identify the prognostic and clinicopathological value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a meta-analysis. The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched from inception to December 14, 2021. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of GNRI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CIs were combined to estimate the clinicopathological significance of the GNRI in NSCLC. Seven studies with 2,023 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A low GNRI score was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.01, 95%CI = 1.65-2.44, p < 0.001) and worse progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.48-2.22, p < 0.001) in NSCLC. Furthermore, a low GNRI score was significantly associated with the histological type of non-adenocarcinoma (OR= 1.55, 95%CI = 1.19-2.03, p = 0.001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2 (OR= 2.81, 95%CI= 1.49-5.32, p = 0.001). A low GNRI score is a significant and effective prognostic marker for poor survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC. In addition, low GNRI score was correlated with higher ECOG PS scores.

Prognostic value of geriatric nutritional risk index for aspiration pneumonia: a retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of aspiration pneumonia remain poorly defined. Geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI) has recently been reported to exhibit a prognostic value for several diseases in older adults.

AIMS

We investigated the clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of GNRI for aspiration pneumonia in older adult patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, conducted in a single-institute acute-phase community hospital, patients with aspiration pneumonia diagnosed at our institute between April 2014 and March 2016 were enrolled. Data on patient characteristics, microbiological findings, and clinical course were collected. The outcome was in-hospital mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to compare the predictive value of each parameter. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 587 aspiration pneumonia patients aged ≥ 65 years were enrolled. Their mean age was 86 years. Among them, 97 (16.5%) died. In ROC analysis for in-hospital mortality, as compared to albumin, body mass index, and A-DROP score, GNRI had a greater area under the curve value, with a significant difference between GNRI and albumin (p = 0.0058). Male sex (p = 0.028), chronic heart failure (p = 0.023), history of malignancy (p = 0.0025), lower GNRI (p < 0.001), and initial antibiotic change (p < 0.001) were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that GNRI is a potential prognostic marker for older adults with aspiration pneumonia and may act as a proxy for disease severity. Our results support the use of GNRI in the clinical management of aspiration pneumonia.

Association of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index With the Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Nivolumab Therapy

The nutritional status has the potential to affect cancer immunity. We evaluated the relationship between the nutritional status and the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted at 14 institutions in Japan between July 2016 and December 2018. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), calculated from body weight and serum albumin, was evaluated in 158 patients with NSCLC who received nivolumab. GNRI was graded as low, moderate, and high. Low GNRI was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival [median, 1.9 mo; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.6-3.3 mo] than moderate (median, 4.0 mo; 95% CI=2.3-5.8 mo; P=0.017) and high GNRI (median, 3.0 mo; 95% CI=1.9-7.2 mo; P=0.014). Low GNRI was also linked to significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (median, 7.8 mo; 95% CI=2.6-12.0 mo) than moderate (median, 13.0 mo; 95% CI=9.6-15.2 mo; P=0.006) and high GNRI (median, 20.6 mo; 95% CI=15.6 mo-not reached; P<0.001). High GNRI was associated with significantly longer OS than moderate GNRI (P=0.015). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, increased GNRI was predictive of longer progression-free survival and OS, similarly as tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. In patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab. GNRI was predictive of survival and may be useful for predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Novel evidence showed that the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) may lead to poor prognosis of human cancers. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the impact of GNRI in lung cancer and its prognostic value.

Methods

We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to July 2021 for relevant research and merged the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association between GNRI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with lung cancer.

Results

Eight studies involving 2,399 patients were included in our primary meta-analysis. The results indicated that lower level of GNRI was associated with poorer OS, RFS, and CSS of lung cancer patients (OS: HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.68–2.35, p < 0.0001; RFS: HR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.11–4.95, p = 0.0258; CSS: HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.43–4.18, p = 0.0011). The association was robust after subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

GNRI may be a prognostic factor of lung cancer, which can lead to poorer survival. However, more prospective studies are necessary to confirm the results.

Systematic Review Registration

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier CRD42021269574.

Association of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index with the survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy

Background

The nutritional status can potentially affect the efficacy of cancer therapy. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), a simple index for evaluating nutritional status calculated from body weight and serum albumin levels, has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various diseases. However, the relationships between GNRI and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unknown.

Methods

The pretreatment levels of GNRI were retrospectively evaluated in 148 chemo-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and scored as low or high.

Results

Patients with a high GNRI had a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR; 44.5% [95% confidence interval {CI} = 35.6%–53.9%] vs. 15.8% [95% CI = 7.4%–30.4%, p = 0.002), longer median progression-free survival (PFS; 6.3 months [95% CI = 5.6–7.2 months] vs. 3.8 months [95% CI = 2.5–4.7 months], p < 0.001), and longer median overall survival (OS; 22.8 months [95% CI = 16.7–27.2 months] vs. 8.5 months [95% CI = 5.4–16.0 months], p < 0.001) than those with low GNRI. High GNRI was independently predictive of better ORR in multivariate logistic regression analysis and longer PFS and OS in multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. In 71 patients who received second-line non-platinum chemotherapy, patients with high GNRI exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS than those with low GNRI (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

GNRI was predictive of prolonged survival in patients with NSCLC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and second-line non-platinum chemotherapy. Assessment of the nutritional status may be useful for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01782-2.

Assessment of Systemic Inflammation and Nutritional Indicators in Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival After Surgical Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Background

Recent studies have shown that the systemic inflammation and nutritional indicators are prognostic for a variety of malignancies. However, only limited data have so far demonstrated their usefulness in gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIST).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of GIST patients who underwent radical surgery in Beijing hospital from October 2004 to July 2018. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare several commonly used inflammatory and nutritional indicators. The indicators with largest AUC were further analysis. Optimal cut-off values of those indicators in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined. Kaplan-Meier curve and the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the prognostic values. We then used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify prognostic factors that were associated with RFS.

Results

In total, 160 patients who underwent surgery for GIST were included in the study. The median survival time was 34.5 months, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates of 96.1%, 84.7%, and 80.8%, respectively. The inflammatory and nutritional indicators with largest AUC were Systemic immunoinflammatory Index (SII) and Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI), reached 0.650 and 0.713, respectively. The optimal cutoff of GNRI and SII were 98.3, and 820.0, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that GNRI, SII, KI67, surgery method, tumor location, tumor size, and mitotic index were all significant prognostic indicators of RFS. After multivariate Cox analysis, independent prognostic factors for RFS in GIST included tumor location, mitotic index, tumor size, and GNRI (HR=2.802,95% CI: 1.045 to 7.515, p = 0.041). Besides, SII also tended to be associated with RFS (HR = 2.970, 95% CI: 0.946 to 9.326, p = 0.062).

Conclusions

High GNRI is an independent prognostic factor for RFS in GIST, while SII can be considered as a prognostic factor. GNRI and SII can be used as tools to evaluate the prognosis of patients before surgery, helping doctors to better treat high-risk patients.

Prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index among patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer who subsequently underwent immunotherapy

Background

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple and useful marker for predicting prognosis and treatment efficacy among patients with various cancers. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no previous reports regarding the prognostic value of GNRI among patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 85 patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC who were administered ICIs at Shinshu University Hospital between February 2016 and October 2020. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups with high (≥89.5) and low (<89.5) GNRI values. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify prognostic factors that were associated with PFS and OS.

Results

The high and low GNRI groups included 61 and 24 patients, respectively. Relative to the low GNRI group, the high GNRI group had significantly longer median PFS (3.7 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.041) and significantly longer median OS (14.2 vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.008). Multivariate analyses revealed that independent predictors of favorable OS were high GNRI, performance status of 0–1, and age of ≥70 years. The high GNRI group was significantly more likely to undergo subsequent therapy after immunotherapy (68.6 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The present study revealed that high GNRI was associated with good outcomes among patients with previously treated NSCLC who were treated with ICIs.