Survival benefits of salvage surgery for primary lung cancer based on routine clinical practice

Lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were to assess the outcomes of lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with nonoperative treatment and to identify prognostic factors associated with survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery (2010-2022) after initial nonoperative treatment at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Exclusion criteria included metachronous cancer, planned neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery for diagnostic or palliative indications. Cox models were constructed for overall survival and event-free survival. Survival of patients with stage IV disease was compared with survival of a nonstudy cohort who did not undergo surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. Initial clinical stage was early stage in 16%, locoregionally advanced in 25%, and metastatic in 59% of patients. The indication for surgery was recurrence in 18%, local persistent disease in 23%, oligoprogression in 22%, and local control of oligometastatic disease in 38% of patients. Grade 3 or greater complications occurred in 5% of patients; 90-day mortality was 3%. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were 39% and 73%, respectively. Male sex and lymphovascular invasion were associated with shorter event-free survival and overall survival; younger age and prior radiation therapy were associated with shorter overall survival. Patients with stage IV disease who received salvage lung resection had better overall survival than similar patients who received subsequent systemic therapy and no surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected, heterogeneous population, lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer was safe. Surgery as local consolidative therapy was associated with encouraging outcomes and should be considered for these patients.

Therapeutic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with various treatment combinations for advanced lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the primary therapeutic option for patients with advanced-stage epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant (EGFR-m) lung adenocarcinoma. However, the role of EGFR-TKIs in advanced-stage lung cancer is uncertain regardless of therapeutic methods. This study investigated the outcome of the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with various therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis used cancer registry data from 1159 patients with lung cancer treated between January 2015 and December 2017 at Tri-Service General Hospital. Only patients with lung adenocarcinoma stages 3B and four were selected for the study. All lung adenocarcinoma patients with ever TKI treatment had an EGFR mutation.

RESULTS

Three-hundred sixty-two patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with complete medical records were enrolled. According to personalized therapeutic processes, they were divided into nine groups: only TKI treatment, only chemotherapy (CT), TKI with lung cancer salvage surgery, TKI with CT, TKI with radiotherapy (RT), CT with lung cancer salvage surgery, CT with RT, TKI with CT, and lung cancer salvage surgery. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed TKI with lung cancer salvage surgery (HR: 4.675, p = 0.005) is the only good prognostic treatment. The poor predictors for overall survival were only CT (HR: 0.336, p = 0.048) and TKI with CT (HR: 0.359, p = 0.023). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a statistical significance in an average overall survival (OS) of ever TKI treatment and never TKI treatment (33.24 vs. 17.64 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, TKI usage duration was statistically increased in TKI with lung cancer salvage surgery (40.4 ± 20.7 vs 14.96 ± 13.13 months, p < 0.001). The survival rate (p = 0.033) and OS (p < 0.001) in lung cancer salvage surgery were statistically better than the group of TKI without surgery.

CONCLUSION

The best therapeutic strategy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma is TKI with lung cancer salvage surgery, according to significantly longer OS and better survival. It also prolonged TKI usage. Mutated EGFR lung adenocarcinoma patients with ever TKI treatment had significantly better survival than with other treatments. Regardless of the combination of other treatments, EGFR mutation with TKI therapy is recommended as a positive prognostic factor for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Reduction of Blood Loss by Means of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator for Thoracoscopic Salvage Anatomic Lung Resections

In centrally located lung tumors, salvage pulmonary resections pose challenges due to adhesions between the pulmonary parenchyma, chest wall, and hilum. This study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes associated with Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) usage in thoracoscopic salvage pulmonary resections. Patients with centrally located advanced-stage lung tumors who underwent salvage anatomic resections following systemic or radiotherapy were included. They were categorized into CUSA and non-CUSA groups, and perioperative parameters and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study included 7 patients in the CUSA group and 15 in the non-CUSA group. Despite a longer median surgical time in the CUSA group (3.8 h vs. 6.0 h, p = 0.021), there was a significant reduction in blood loss (100 mL vs. 250 mL, p = 0.014). Multivariate analyses revealed that the use of CUSA and radiotherapy had opposing effects on blood loss (β: -296.7, 95% CI: -24.8 to -568.6, p = 0.034 and β: 282.9, 95% CI: 19.7 to 546.3, p = 0.037, respectively). In conclusion, while using CUSA in the salvage anatomic resection of centrally located lung cancer may result in a longer surgical time, it is crucial in minimizing blood loss during the procedure.

Salvage surgery for advanced non-small cell lung cancer following previous immunotherapy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The development of systemic chemotherapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided patients with unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) an opportunity to undergo surgical intervention after initial treatment. However, no consensus regarding the indication for salvage surgery in these patients has been reached.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent salvage surgery for advanced NSCLC (cStage IIIA-IVB) after treatment with ICIs from January 2018 to December 2022 at Aizu Medical Center and Fukushima Medical University Hospital. We evaluated the patients' clinical data, calculated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and assessed the survival benefit using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent salvage surgery after immunotherapy. All patients achieved downstaging after initial chemotherapy. Eleven patients underwent lobectomy, and one patient underwent extirpation of intra-abdominal lymph nodes. The mean surgery time and intraoperative blood loss were 242.2 min and 415.1 g, respectively. The mean drainage period was 4.2 days (range, 2-9 days). Grade ≥ 3 postoperative complications were confirmed in three patients. The 2-year DFS rate was 71.2%, and the 2-year OS rate was 76.2%. A pathological complete response compatible with ypStage 0 was achieved in four (30.8%) patients. Patients with ypStage 0 and I achieved significantly better OS than those with ypStage ≥ II (p = 0.044), and patients without severe complications achieved significantly better DFS and OS than those with severe complications (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery after chemotherapy including ICIs is a feasible and effective treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who acquire downstaging to pathological stage 0 or I. However, severe perioperative complications might affect patient survival. A prospective study is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of salvage surgery.

Safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of 46 patients from four Keio-affiliated hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Advances in drug therapy and radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer resulted in an increased number of salvage surgeries for initially unresectable tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We defined salvage surgery as (1) surgery for local recurrence/residual tumor after definitive chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (salvage surgery in a narrow sense) or (2) conversion surgery after non-surgical treatment. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent salvage surgery at four Keio University-affiliated hospitals.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included. The initial clinical stage was I in 4 patients (9%), III in 19 (41%), and IV in 23 (48%). Initial treatment before salvage surgery was chemoradiotherapy in 10 patients (24%), radiotherapy in 4 (9%), and drug therapy in 32 (67%). Pneumonectomy, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection were performed in 2 (4%), 37 (80%), 3 (7%), and 4 (9%) patients, respectively. Complete resection was achieved in 41 patients (89%). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients (24%). Initial chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (odds ratio 10, p = 0.03). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0 and 2%, respectively. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 66 and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer were acceptable. Salvage surgery was a viable treatment option for selected patients with recurrent/residual tumors after non-surgical treatments.

Survival benefits of salvage surgery for primary lung cancer based on routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Premeditated induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is accepted as safe and effective. Studies on salvage surgery in patients with incompletely cured lung cancer are lacking. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study on patients who underwent salvage surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2005 and December 2016 at the 14 hospitals of the Chubu Lung Cancer Surgery Study Group. A total of 37 patients were assigned to the salvage surgery group; a lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed. The survival benefit was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Although postoperative complications were observed in 11 patients (29.7%), surgery-related death occurred in only one patient (mortality rate: 2.7%) resulting from respiratory failure caused by interstitial pneumonia exacerbation. Postoperative recurrence was observed in 22 patients (61.1%), the incidence of brain metastasis being high (nine patients: 40.9%). The five-year survival rate from the first day of treatment was 60%. The survival of the postoperative pathological stage (s'-stage) I group was significantly better (five-year survival rate: 80.9%) than that of the other groups (p < 0.05). S'-stage was the most significant factor (p < 0.01) associated with long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery is a feasible therapeutic modality for advanced lung cancer. Downstaging to s'-stage I with previous treatment was most important for survival. Complete resection (R0) should be the goal because surgical procedures were tolerated despite intense treatment.