Performance of Norwegian civilian EMTs and army medics in penetrating trauma: a controlled simulation-based assessment

Evaluating Medic Performance in Combat Casualty Care Simulation and Training: A Scoping Review of Prospective Research

INTRODUCTION

Combat medics are required to perform highly technical medical procedures in austere environments with minimal error. Effective means to quantify medic performance in field and simulated environments are critical to optimize medic training procedures as well as to evaluate the influence of medical equipment and other supportive technologies on medic performance. Human performance evaluation in combat casualty care presents many unique challenges due to the unique environment (battlefields) and population (medics) that must be represented. Recent advances in simulation and measurement technology have presented opportunities to improve simulation fidelity and measurement quality; however, it is currently unclear to what extent these advances have been adopted in this domain.

METHODOLOGY

In this work, a scoping review of recent (2011-2021) prospective research on Army medic (68 W and Special Operations) performance is presented. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines served as the framework for the review. The goal of this work was to summarize recent trends and practices and to illuminate opportunities for future work. Two human factors experts performed an exhaustive review of relevant, peer-reviewed literature and systematically identified articles for inclusion in the final analysis. The articles were examined in detail, and data elements of interest were extracted.

RESULTS

Forty-eight articles were identified based on the defined inclusion criteria. Thirty three of the articles focused on technological evaluation, 25 focused on medic training procedures, and 5 focused on evaluating medical techniques. Study contributions were predominantly related to medic training materials/procedures and simulator technology. Supportive medical technologies, including telemedical systems, hemorrhage control devices, and ultrasound devices, also received significant attention. Timing was the most common metric used to quantify medic performance, followed by skill pass/fail ratings. There was a notable lack of neurophysiological data used to examine medic physical/cognitive workload during procedures, a growing practice in many other related domains. The most commonly simulated procedures were hemorrhage control, airway management, and thoracostomy. Notable limitations cited across articles were insufficient simulation fidelity, inadequate sample size or sample representativeness, and poor study design.

CONCLUSIONS

This work provided a summary of recent peer-reviewed research related to medic simulation and training, and performance evaluation. This article should be used to contextualize existing research and inspire new research questions. Expanding and advancing research on medic simulation and training will help to ensure optimal casualty care at the front lines.

Framework for the evaluation of military health systems

The organisation of a military health system (MHS) differs from the civilian system due to the role of the armed forces, the unique nature of the supported population and their occupational health requirements. A previously published review of the Military Medical Corps Worldwide Almanac demonstrated the value of a standardised framework for evaluation and comparison of MHSs. This paper proposes such a framework which highlights the unique features of MHSs not covered by health services research of national health systems. These include: national context and summary; organisational structure; firm base facilities, healthcare beneficiaries and medical research; operational capabilities, overseas deployments, collaborations and alliances; personnel including recruitment, training and education; and history and culture. This common framework can help facilitate international collaboration between military medical services including capability development, training exercises and mutual support during military operations. It can also inform national contributions to future editions of the Almanac.

Norwegian Emergency Medicine Systems' Training and Equipment for Penetrating Injuries: A National Survey-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

Recent terror attacks led the Norwegian government to develop a procedure for emergency and law enforcement services cooperation during Active Violent Incidents (AVI, abbreviated PLIVO in Norwegian). To address further national initiatives to improve preparedness for mass casualty events and penetrating injuries among emergency medical services (EMS) in Norway, training and equipment status were mapped.

METHODS

All EMS regions in Norway were invited to participate in an electronic nation-wide survey about practical medical training in PLIVO scenario training and specific training in hemorrhage control and penetrating injuries.

RESULTS

Ninety percent (842/938) had attended at least 1 PLIVO training scenario. Of these, 76% (642/938) reported only evacuation training during the exercise, while only 20% (168/938) had practiced hemorrhage control. Eighty-one percent (760/938) respondents reported that they were equipped with tourniquets and 91% (853/938) were equipped with gauze to pack wounds. However, only 52% (487/938) and 48% (450/938) reported practical training in tourniquet application and wound packing, respectively, while 30% (280/938) reported that they had no training or only theoretical education in tourniquet application. Supervised practical training on penetrating thoracic injuries was reported by <20%, and <50% reported practical training in needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced focus on training in hemorrhage control and penetrating injuries is needed. This supports the recent decision from the Norwegian government to strengthen the training for EMS in AVI (PLIVO) exercises, by focusing on medical procedures in addition to evacuation training. Although the estimated response rate is 17%, we believe the large number of respondents still make the results valuable.

Performance of Norwegian civilian EMTs and army medics in penetrating trauma: a controlled simulation-based assessment

Background

Penetrating trauma kills rapidly. Thorough and efficient examination and aggressive hemorrhage control is important to save lives. The aim of this study was to assess the skills of civilian Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) in bleeding examination and control compared to Army Medics. Our hypothesis was that civilian pre‐hospital systems perform at a lower level compared to an expert group, and did not have sufficient focus on education and training in examination and treatment of penetrating injuries.

Material and methods

We included 60 volunteer Certified EMTs and Army Medics. First, the participants examined a wounded patient. Second, the participants were presented a patient with a penetrating injury on a pork side fixated to the thigh with an artificial arterial bleeding.

Results

The EMTs took significantly shorter time examining, median 1 min 5 s vs. 3 min 58 s (P < 0.001). 5/30 (17%) of EMTs and 28/30 (93%) of army medics did an approved gauze wound packing of the penetrating injury (P < 0.001). EMTs took (median) 18 s and army medics 8 s to hemostasis regardless of approved packing or not (P < 0.001). Time spent on the packing was (median) 1 min 50 s vs. 5 min 47 s respectively (P < 0.001). Increasing time spent on the procedure showed significantly better chance of a successful procedure.

Conclusion

The EMTs had lower accuracy in examination but used significantly shorter time than the Army Medics. The treatment part of the study showed poor EMT performance compared to the Army Medics. This study indicates that more wound packing training needs to be incorporated into initial and ongoing civilian EMT training.