1
|
Aljohani DM, Almalki N, Dixon D, Adam R, Forget P. Experiences and perspectives of adults on using opioids for pain management in the postoperative period: A scoping review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:500-512. [PMID: 38757159 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids play an important role in peri-operative pain management. However, opioid use is challenging for healthcare practitioners and patients because of concerns related to opioid crises, addiction and side effects. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to identify and synthesise the existing evidence related to adults' experiences of opioid use in postoperative pain management. DESIGN Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. Inductive content analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were applied to analyse and report the findings and to identify unexplored gaps in the literature. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All qualitative and mixed-method studies, in English, that not only used a qualitative approach that explored adults' opinions or concerns about opioids and/or opioid reduction, and adults' experience related to opioid use for postoperative pain control, including satisfaction, but also aspects of overall quality of a person's life (physical, mental and social well being). RESULTS Ten studies were included; nine were qualitative ( n = 9) and one used mixed methods. The studies were primarily conducted in Europe and North America. Concerns about opioid dependence, adverse effects, stigmatisation, gender roles, trust and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients appeared repeatedly throughout the studies. The TDF analysis showed that many peri-operative factors formed people's perceptions and experiences of opioids, driven by the following eight domains: Knowledge, Emotion, Beliefs about consequences, Beliefs about capabilities, Self-confidence, Environmental Context and Resources, Social influences and Decision Processes/Goals. Adults have diverse pain management goals, which can be categorised as proactive and positive goals, such as individualised pain management care, as well as avoidance goals, aimed at sidestepping issues such as addiction and opioid-related side effects. CONCLUSION It is desirable to understand the complexity of adults' experiences of pain management especially with opioid use and to support adults in achieving their pain management goals by implementing an individualised approach, effective communication and patient-clinician relationships. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine patients' experiences of postoperative opioid use and their involvement in opioid usage decision-making. A summary is provided regarding adults' experiences of peri-operative opioid use, which may inform future researchers, healthcare providers and guideline development by considering these factors when improving patient care and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia M Aljohani
- From the Pain and opioids after Surgery (PANDOS) European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Research Group (DMA, PF), Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK (PF), Department of Anesthesia Technology (DMA), Department of Nursing, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (NA), Department of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK (DD), School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland (DD), Health Psychology Group (DD), Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen (DMA, RA) and Department of Anaesthesia, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, UK (PF)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Popova L, Massey ZB, Giordano NA. Warning Labels as a Public Health Intervention: Effects and Challenges for Tobacco, Cannabis, and Opioid Medications. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:425-442. [PMID: 38166502 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-042254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
Warning labels help consumers understand product risks, enabling informed decisions. Since the 1966 introduction of cigarette warning labels in the United States, research has determined the most effective message content (health effects information) and format (brand-free packaging with pictures). However, new challenges have emerged. This article reviews the current state of tobacco warning labels in the United States, where legal battles have stalled pictorial cigarette warnings and new products such as electronic cigarettes and synthetic nicotine products pose unknown health risks. This article describes the emerging research on cannabis warnings; as more places legalize recreational cannabis, they are adopting lessons from tobacco warnings. However, its uncertain legal status and widespread underestimation of harms impede strict warning standards. The article also reviews opioid medication warning labels, suggesting that lessons from tobacco could help in the development of effective and culturally appropriate FDA-compliant opioid warning labels that promote safe medication use and increased co-dispensing of naloxone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Popova
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;
| | - Zachary B Massey
- School of Journalism, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Nicholas A Giordano
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carey A, Starkweather A, Bai A, Horgas A, Cho H, Beneciuk JM. Emergency Department Discharge Teaching Interventions: A Scoping Review. J Emerg Nurs 2024; 50:444-462. [PMID: 38323972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department discharge education is intended to provide patients with information to self-manage their condition or injury, identify potential complications, and follow-up or referral. However, most patients cannot recall the discharge information provided, leading to adverse clinical outcomes, return visits, and higher costs. A scoping review was undertaken to explore discharge education interventions that have been studied in the emergency department setting and outcomes that have been used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. METHODS A literature review was conducted using the databases PubMed/Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Education Resources Information Center, with search terms focused on emergency nursing and patient discharge education interventions. RESULTS Of the publications identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was variation among studies on the conditions/injuries and populations of focus for the intervention. The interventions were categorized by learning styles, including auditory (n=10), kinesthetic (n=1), visual (n=15), reading/writing (n=1), and multimodal (n=7). Outcomes evaluated included those that were patient-specific (education, self-management, clinical, and adherence) and metrics of the health system and public health. DISCUSSION Multimodal discharge education that addresses various learning styles and levels of health literacy improved patient education, self-management, and clinical outcomes. Additional support and reminders improved patient adherence. Identified gaps included limited kinesthetic interventions and culturally tailored education. Translational science for advancing sustainable interventions in clinical practice is needed to enhance the emergency department discharge process and patient, system, and public health outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hebard S, Weaver G, Hansen WB, Ruppert S. Evaluation of a Pilot Program to Prevent the Misuse of Prescribed Opioids Among Health Care Workers: Repeated Measures Survey Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e53665. [PMID: 38607664 PMCID: PMC11053396 DOI: 10.2196/53665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overprescription of opioids has led to increased misuse of opioids, resulting in higher rates of overdose. The workplace can play a vital role in an individual's intentions to misuse prescription opioids with injured workers being prescribed opioids, at a rate 3 times the national average. For example, health care workers are at risk for injuries, opioid dispensing, and diversion. Intervening within a context that may contribute to risks for opioid misuse while targeting individual psychosocial factors may be a useful complement to interventions at policy and prescribing levels. OBJECTIVE This pilot study assessed the effects of a mobile-friendly opioid misuse intervention prototype tailored for health care workers using the preparation phase of a multiphase optimization strategy design. METHODS A total of 33 health care practitioners participated in the pilot intervention, which included 10 brief web-based lessons aimed at impacting psychosocial measures that underlie opioid misuse. The lesson topics included: addiction beliefs, addiction control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and recommendations, beliefs about patient-provider relationships and communication, control in communicating with providers, beliefs about self-monitoring pain and side effects, control in self-monitoring pain and side effects, diversion and disposal beliefs, diversion and disposal control, and a conclusion lesson. Using a treatment-only design, pretest and posttest surveys were collected. A general linear repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess mean differences from pretest to posttest. Descriptive statistics were used to assess participant feedback about the intervention. RESULTS After completing the intervention, participants showed significant mean changes with increases in knowledge of opioids (+0.459; P<.001), less favorable attitudes toward opioids (-1.081; P=.001), more positive beliefs about communication with providers (+0.205; P=.01), more positive beliefs about pain management control (+0.969; P<.001), and increased intentions to avoid opioid use (+0.212; P=.03). Of the 33 practitioners who completed the program, most felt positive about the information presented, and almost 70% (23/33) agreed or strongly agreed that other workers in the industry should complete a program like this. CONCLUSIONS While attempts to address the opioid crisis have been made through public health policies and prescribing initiatives, opioid misuse continues to rise. Certain industries place workers at greater risk for injury and opioid dispensing, making interventions that target workers in these industries of particular importance. Results from this pilot study show positive impacts on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about communicating with providers and pain management control, as well as intentions to avoid opioid misuse. However, the dropout rate and small sample size are severe limitations, and the results lack generalizability. Results will be used to inform program revisions and future optimization trials, with the intention of providing insight for future intervention development and evaluation of mobile-friendly eHealth interventions for employees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - GracieLee Weaver
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States
| | | | - Scarlett Ruppert
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mortelmans L, Dilles T. The development and evaluation of a medication diary to report problems with medication use. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26127. [PMID: 38375256 PMCID: PMC10875575 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to develop and evaluate a medication diary for patients to report problems with medication use to enable shared-decision making and improve medication adherence. Methods Based on a search for existing diaries, a review of the content, and a list of medication self-management problems compiled from previous research, a paper and pencil version of a medication diary was developed. The diary was reviewed for clarity and overall presentation by five healthcare providers and nine patients. Afterwards, user-friendliness was evaluated by 69 patients with polypharmacy discharged from hospital during a quantitative prospective study. Results The medication diary consists of several parts: (1) a medication schedule allowing patients to list their medicines, (2) information sheets allowing patients to write down specific medication-related information, (3) a monthly overview to indicate daily whether medication-related problems were experienced, (4) problem sheets elaborating on the problems encountered, (5) space for specific medication-related questions for healthcare providers to facilitate shared-decision making. The review phase resulted in minor textual adjustments and one extra problem in the problem sheet. Most participants, who tested the medication diary for two months, found the diary user-friendly (80%) and easy to fill in (89%). About 40% of participants reported problems with medication use. Half of the patients indicated that the diary can facilitate discussing problems with healthcare providers. Conclusion The medication diary offers patients the opportunity to report problems regarding their medication use in a proven user-friendly manner and to discuss these problems with healthcare providers. Reporting and discussing problems with medication use can serve as a first step towards making shared decisions on how to address the problems encountered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mortelmans
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Varady NH, Chen AF, Niu R, Chung M, Freccero DM, Smith EL. Association Between Surgical Opioid Prescriptions and Opioid Initiation by Opioid-naïve Spouses. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1218-e1224. [PMID: 34954759 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether surgical opioid prescriptions are associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by operative patients' spouses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Adverse effects of surgical opioids on operative patients have been well described. Whether risks of surgical opioids extend to operative patients' family members is unknown. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of opioid-naïve, married patients undergoing 1 of 11 common surgeries from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2017. The adjusted association between surgical opioid prescriptions and opioid initiation by the operative patient's spouse in the 6-months after surgery was assessed. Secondary analyses assessed how this association varied with postoperative time. RESULTS There were 318,022 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 48.8 ±9.3 years; 49.5% women). Among the 50,833 (16.0%) patients that did not fill a surgical opioid prescription, 2152 (4.2%) had spouses who filled an opioid prescription within 6-months of their surgery. In comparison, among the 267,189 (84.0%) patients who filled a surgical opioid prescription, 15,026 (5.6%) had spouses who filled opioid prescriptions within 6-months of their surgery [unadjusted P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.43, P < 0.001]. Associated risks were only mildly elevated in postoperative month 1 (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, P = 0.04) before increasing to a peak in postoperative month 3 (aOR 1.57,95% CI 1.391.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Surgical opioid prescriptions were associated with increased risk of opioid initiation by spouses of operative patients, suggesting that risks associated with surgical opioids may extend beyond the surgical patient. These findings may highlight the importance of preoperative counseling on safe opioid use, storage, and disposal for both patients and their partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan H Varady
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ruijia Niu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical center, Boston, MA
| | - Mei Chung
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
| | - David M Freccero
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical center, Boston, MA
| | - Eric L Smith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seilern und Aspang J, Schenker ML, Port A, Leslie S, Giordano NA. A systematic review of patient-centered interventions for improving pain outcomes and reducing opioid-related risks in acute care settings. OTA Int 2023; 6:e226. [PMID: 36760660 PMCID: PMC9904190 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objectives This systematic review evaluates the literature for patient-oriented opioid and pain educational interventions that aim to optimize pain management using opioid-sparing approaches in the orthopaedic trauma population. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234006). Data Sources A review of English-language publications in CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase.com, PsycInfo (EBSCO), and Web of Science Core Collection literature databases published between 1980 and February 2021 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Study Selection Only studies implementing patient-oriented opioid and/or pain education in adult patients receiving acute orthopaedic care were eligible. Outcomes were required to include postinterventional opioid utilization, postoperative analgesia and amount, or patient-reported pain outcomes. Data Extraction A total of 480 abstracts were reviewed, and 8 publications were included in the final analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies using a standardized data collection form. Disagreements were addressed by a third reviewer. Quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data Synthesis Descriptive statistics characterized study findings, and content analysis was used to discern themes across studies. Conclusion Our findings indicate the merit for patient-centered educational interventions including verbal/written/audio-visual trainings paired with multimodal approaches to target opioid-sparing pain management and reduce short-term pain scores in urgent and acute care settings after acute orthopaedic injuries. The scarcity of published literature warrants further rigorously designed studies to substantiate the benefit of patient-centric education in reducing prolonged opioid utilization and associated risks after orthopaedic trauma. Level of Evidence Therapeutic level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Seilern und Aspang
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mara L. Schenker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ada Port
- Christopher Wolf Crusade, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sharon Leslie
- Emory University, Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, 1462 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reese TJ, Liu S, Steitz B, McCoy A, Russo E, Koh B, Ancker J, Wright A. Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:1744-1756. [PMID: 35652167 PMCID: PMC9471719 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Complex interventions with multiple components and behavior change strategies are increasingly implemented as a form of clinical decision support (CDS) using native electronic health record functionality. Objectives of this study were, therefore, to (1) identify the proportion of randomized controlled trials with CDS interventions that were complex, (2) describe common gaps in the reporting of complexity in CDS research, and (3) determine the impact of increased complexity on CDS effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS To assess CDS complexity and identify reporting gaps for characterizing CDS interventions, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting tool for complex interventions. We evaluated the effect of increased complexity using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Most included studies evaluated a complex CDS intervention (76%). No studies described use of analytical frameworks or causal pathways. Two studies discussed use of theory but only one fully described the rationale and put it in context of a behavior change. A small but positive effect (standardized mean difference, 0.147; 95% CI, 0.039-0.255; P < .01) in favor of increasing intervention complexity was observed. DISCUSSION While most CDS studies should classify interventions as complex, opportunities persist for documenting and providing resources in a manner that would enable CDS interventions to be replicated and adapted. Unless reporting of the design, implementation, and evaluation of CDS interventions improves, only slight benefits can be expected. CONCLUSION Conceptualizing CDS as complex interventions may help convey the careful attention that is needed to ensure these interventions are contextually and theoretically informed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Siru Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bryan Steitz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Allison McCoy
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elise Russo
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian Koh
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jessica Ancker
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Adam Wright
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghaddaf AA, Alsharef JF, Alhindi AK, Bahathiq DM, Khaldi SE, Alowaydhi HM, Alshehri MS. Influence of perioperative opioid-related patient education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2824-2840. [PMID: 35537899 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the role of perioperative protocolized opioid-specific patient education on opioid consumption for individuals undergoing surgical procedures. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared protocolized perioperative opioid-specific patient education to the usual care for adult individuals undergoing surgical interventions. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to represent continuous outcomes while the risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS In total, 15 RCTs that enrolled 2546 participants were deemed eligible. Protocolized opioid-specific patient education showed a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain score compared to usual care (SMD= -0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.28 to -0.03 and SMD= -0.17, 95% CI: -0.28 to -0.06, respectively). No significant difference was found between the protocolized opioid-specific patient education and the usual care in terms of the number of refill requests (RR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.50-1.34), patients with opioid leftovers (RR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.78-1.08), and patients taking opioids after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrated that protocolized opioid-specific patient education significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption and pain score but has no influence on the number of opioid refill requests, opioid leftovers, and opioid use after hospital discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Healthcare professionals may offer opioid-related educational sessions for the surgical patients during the perioperative period through a video-based material that emphasizes the role of alternative analgesics to opioids, patients' expectations about the post-operative pain, and the potential side effects of opioid consumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah A Ghaddaf
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Jawaher F Alsharef
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Abeer K Alhindi
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Dena M Bahathiq
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Shahad E Khaldi
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hanin M Alowaydhi
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mohammed S Alshehri
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Surgery/Orthopedic section, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Treacy-Abarca S, Mercado J, Serrano J, Gonzalez J, Menchine M, Arora S, Wu S, Burner E. Technological Proficiencies, Engagement, and Practical Considerations for mHealth Programs at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital Emergency Departments: Data Analysis. JMIR Diabetes 2022; 7:e23641. [PMID: 35666555 PMCID: PMC9210200 DOI: 10.2196/23641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Safety-net emergency departments often serve as the primary entry point for medical care for low income predominantly minority patient populations. Herein, we sought to provide insight into the feasibility, technological proficiencies, engagement characteristics, and practical considerations for a mHealth intervention at a safety-net emergency department. Objective We aimed to analyze patient technological proficiency to understand the feasibility of and draw practical considerations for mobile phone technology (mHealth) solutions for patients with chronic disease served by safety-net emergency departments. Methods We analyzed data from a previous diabetes randomized clinical mHealth trial for a diabetes social support intervention. Patients from a safety-net emergency department with preexisting diabetes who used SMS text messages, owned a mobile phone, and with hemoglobin A1c levels >8.5% were enrolled. A text message–based mHealth program to improve disease self-management was provided to all patients. Supporters of patients were randomized to receive a mailed copy or mHealth-based curriculum designed to improve diabetes support. Among enrolled patients, we surveyed mobile technological capacity and frequency of use. We performed latent class analysis to identify classes of patients by level of technological proficiency and compared demographic characteristics between the latent classes to identify demographic subgroups that may require more training or tailoring of the mHealth approach. Study engagement between classes was assessed by comparing the mean number of text messages exchanged, loss to follow-up, and early termination. Results Of 1876 patients who were approached, 44.2% (n=829) of patients had a stable mobile phone and were able to use text messages. Among them 166 met the trial inclusion and enrolled, 90% (149/166) of the cohort were ethnically diverse. Significant variance was found in technology capacity and frequency of use. Our latent class analysis classified 75% (124/166) of patients as highly technologically proficient and 25% (42/166) patients as minimally technologically proficient. Age (P<.001) and level of education (P<.001) were associated with class membership. Highly technologically proficient patients were younger and had higher levels of education (45.74 years old; high school or more: 90%) than minimally technologically proficient patients (53.64 years old; high school or more: 18%). Highly technologically proficient participants exchanged a mean of 40 text messages with the system coordinators compared to a mean of 10 text messages by minimally technologically proficient patients (P<.001). Conclusions This study found that nearly half of the patients screened at the safety-net emergency department were equipped for an SMS text message–based mHealth intervention. In the small sample of patients who were enrolled, the majority were classified as highly technologically proficient. These highly proficient patients had greater study engagement. mHealth use in emergency departments may be an opportunity to improve health of ethnically diverse populations by pairing sophisticated chronic disease self-management program with SMS text message–based and traditional in-person interventions to reach patients through the method that is most familiar and comfortable. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.003
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Treacy-Abarca
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Janisse Mercado
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jorge Serrano
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Michael Menchine
- Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sanjay Arora
- Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shinyi Wu
- Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Burner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Giordano NA, Seilern Und Aspang J, Baker J, Medline A, Rice CW, Barrell B, Kirk L, Ortega E, Wallace M, Steck A, Schenker ML. Integration of Life Care Specialists Into Orthopaedic Trauma Care to Improve Postoperative Outcomes: A Pilot Study. Pain Manag Nurs 2022; 23:608-615. [PMID: 35477669 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIM: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and impact of integrating a Life Care Specialist (LCS) into orthopaedic trauma care. DESIGN This was a prospective feasibility single group pilot study at a level 1 trauma center. METHOD The LCS is a paraprofessional behavior-based "pain coach" and delivered patient-centered opioid safety education, trained participants on nonpharmacologic pain management approaches, conducted opioid risk assessments, and coordinated care. Numeric Rating Scale pain scores were assessed on admission, at discharge, and at 2-week follow-up. Daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during hospitalization, opioid medication use at 2-weeks, and patient satisfaction were recorded. T test compared mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME) to historical orthopaedic trauma patient population's mean dosage at discharge from the study site. Generalized linear models assessed pain scores over time. RESULTS Twenty-two percent of 121 total participants met criteria for moderate to severe risk of opioid misuse at initial hospitalization. On average, 2.8 LCS pain management interventions were utilized, most frequently progressive muscle relaxation (80%) and sound therapy (48%). Mean inpatient MME/day was 40.5, which was significantly lower than mean historical MME/day of 49.7 (p < .001). Pain scores improved over time from admission to 2-weeks postoperatively (p < .001). Nearly all participants agreed that the LCS was helpful in managing pain (99%). CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate feasibility to integrate LCS into orthopaedic trauma care, evident by participant engagement and satisfaction, and that LCS serve as valuable resources to assist with pain management and opioid education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - J'Lynn Baker
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexandra Medline
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - Erika Ortega
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Alaina Steck
- Emory University Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mara L Schenker
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Giordano NA, Seilern Und Aspang J, Baker J, Rice CW, Barrell B, Kirk L, Ortega E, Wallace M, Steck A, Schenker ML. The effect of a Life Care Specialist on pain management and opioid-related outcomes among patients with orthopedic trauma: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:858. [PMID: 34838101 PMCID: PMC8626911 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05841-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthopedic trauma patients face complex pain management needs and are frequently prescribed opioids, leaving them at-risk for prolonged opioid use. To date, post-trauma pain management research has placed little emphasis on individualized risk assessments for misuse and systematically implementing non-pharmacologic pain management strategies. Therefore, a community-academic partnership was formed to design a novel position in the healthcare field (Life Care Specialist (LCS)), who will educate patients on the risks of opioids, tapering usage, safe disposal practices, and harm reduction strategies. In addition, the LCS teaches patients behavior-based strategies for pain management, utilizing well-described techniques for coping and resilience. This study aims to determine the effects of LCS intervention on opioid utilization, pain control, and patient satisfaction in the aftermath of orthopedic trauma. METHODS In total, 200 orthopedic trauma patients will be randomized to receive an intervention (LCS) or a standard-of-care control at an urban level 1 trauma center. All patients will be assessed with comprehensive social determinants of health and substance use surveys immediately after surgery (baseline). Follow-up assessments will be performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and will include pain medication utilization (morphine milligram equivalents), pain scores, and other substance use. In addition, overall patient wellness will be evaluated with objective actigraphy measures and patient-reported outcomes. Finally, a survey of patient understanding of risks of opioid use and misuse will be collected, to assess the influence of LCS opioid education. DISCUSSION There is limited data on the role of individualized, multimodal, non-pharmacologic, behavioral-based pain management intervention in opioid-related risk-mitigation in high-risk populations, including the orthopedic trauma patients. The findings from this randomized controlled trial will provide scientific and clinical evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of the LCS intervention. Moreover, the final aim will provide early evidence into which patients benefit most from LCS intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04154384 . Registered on 11/6/2019 (last updated on 6/10/2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Giordano
- Emory University, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, 1520 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Jesse Seilern Und Aspang
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - J'Lynn Baker
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | | | | | | | - Erika Ortega
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | | | - Alaina Steck
- Emory University Department of Emergency Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA
| | - Mara L Schenker
- Emory University Orthopaedic Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. .,Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Montague E, Bungum M, Sherman L, Gravenor S, Courtney DM, Czerniak A, Wolf M, McCarthy D. Using a sociotechnical systems analysis to evaluate an intervention to improve opioid prescribing in emergency medicine. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2021; 97:103495. [PMID: 34298388 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The United States is facing an unprecedented epidemic of opioid addiction and death due to opioid overdose. In an effort to improve patient knowledge and safe use about opioids, an Electronic Medication Complete Communication (EMC2) opioid strategy was developed targeting opioid naïve patients in the Emergency Department (ED). We conducted pre and post sociotechnical systems analyses to evaluate the variance between the process before the intervention and whether or not the process changed as expected with the new intervention. Results were analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis. Sociotechnical systems modeling illustrates the complexity of designing interventions for emergency medicine that affect multiple patients, providers, work systems, technologies, and processes. The post work systems model illustrates that several elements in the external ED environment can affect the effectiveness of the intervention. Sociotechnical systems analysis is an effective tool to illustrate the opportunities for designing health system interventions and evaluating the fidelity of such interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lauren Sherman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stephanie Gravenor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - D Mark Courtney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alyssa Czerniak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mike Wolf
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Danielle McCarthy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu S, Reese TJ, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Weir C. A theory-based meta-regression of factors influencing clinical decision support adoption and implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2514-2522. [PMID: 34387686 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to explore the theoretical underpinnings of effective clinical decision support (CDS) factors using the comparative effectiveness results. MATERIALS AND METHODS We leveraged search results from a previous systematic literature review and updated the search to screen articles published from January 2017 to January 2020. We included randomized controlled trials and cluster randomized controlled trials that compared a CDS intervention with and without specific factors. We used random effects meta-regression procedures to analyze clinician behavior for the aggregate effects. The theoretical model was the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model with motivational control. RESULTS Thirty-four studies were included. The meta-regression models identified the importance of effort expectancy (estimated coefficient = -0.162; P = .0003); facilitating conditions (estimated coefficient = 0.094; P = .013); and performance expectancy with motivational control (estimated coefficient = 1.029; P = .022). Each of these factors created a significant impact on clinician behavior. The meta-regression model with the multivariate analysis explained a large amount of the heterogeneity across studies (R2 = 88.32%). DISCUSSION Three positive factors were identified: low effort to use, low controllability, and providing more infrastructure and implementation strategies to support the CDS. The multivariate analysis suggests that passive CDS could be effective if users believe the CDS is useful and/or social expectations to use the CDS intervention exist. CONCLUSIONS Overall, a modified UTAUT model that includes motivational control is an appropriate model to understand psychological factors associated with CDS effectiveness and to guide CDS design, implementation, and optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siru Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Thomas J Reese
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Charlene Weir
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Perceptions of Signs of Addiction Among Opioid Naive Patients Prescribed Opioids in the Emergency Department. J Addict Med 2021; 15:491-497. [PMID: 33560692 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient knowledge deficits related to opioid risks, including lack of knowledge regarding addiction, are well documented. Our objective was to characterize patients' perceptions of signs of addiction. METHODS This study utilized data obtained as part of a larger interventional trial. Consecutively discharged English-speaking patients, age >17 years, at an urban academic emergency department, with a new opioid prescription were enrolled from July 2015 to August 2017. During a follow-up phone interview 7 to 14 days after discharge, participants were asked a single question, "What are the signs of addiction to pain medicine?" Verbatim transcribed answers were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach and double coding. These codes were then grouped into themes. RESULTS There were 325 respondents, 57% female, mean age 43.8 years, 70.1% privately insured. Ten de novo codes were added to the 11 DSM-V criteria codes. Six themes were identified: (1) effort spent acquiring opioids, (2) emotional and physical changes related to opioid use, (3) opioid use that is "not needed, (4) increasing opioid use, (5) an emotional relationship with opioids, and (6) the inability to stop opioid use. CONCLUSIONS Signs of addiction identified by opioid naive patients were similar to concepts identified in medical definitions. However, participants' understanding also included misconceptions, omissions, and conflated misuse behaviors with signs of addiction. Identifying these differences will help inform patient-provider risk communication, providing an opportunity for counseling and prevention.
Collapse
|
16
|
Brucker K. Opioid Prescribing From the ED: We Can All Do More to Help. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:1395-1396. [PMID: 31742817 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|