The Impact of Advanced Practice Provider Staffing on Emergency Department Care: Productivity, Flow, Safety, and Experience

Trends in advanced practice providers in plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2013-2021

This restrospective cohort study of Medicare payment data found increases in the number of advanced practice providers who bill for plastic and reconstructive surgery care. The growth in advanced practice providers is expected to continue in plastic surgery, and further investigation is needed to effectively integrate these providers into academic centers.

A systematic integrative review of specialized nurses' role to establish a culture of patient safety: A modelling perspective

AIMS

To understand specialized nurses' role in the culture of patient safety and their ability to promote and enforce it within healthcare.

DESIGN

A systematic integrative review using the approach of Whittemore and Knafl.

METHODS

Systematic literature search for qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies, followed by data evaluation, quality assessment, analysis and research synthesis with a narrative perspective. Findings were contextualized within a 'framework for understanding the development of patient safety culture'.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in PubMed [including MEDLINE], Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE from Jan 2013 until Sep 2023.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies published in English from six different countries were selected and used for research synthesis. Diverse enabling factors and enacting behaviours influencing specialized nurses' roles to promote patient safety culture were identified, mainly focusing on nurses' workload, professional experiences and organizational commitment. Patient safety outcomes focused on medication management, infection prevention, surveillance process in critical care, oversight on quality and safety of nurses' practice, patient care management, continuity of care, adherence to the treatment plan and implementation of a specialized therapeutic procedure.

CONCLUSION

Specialized nurses can make a significant contribution to promote patient safety culture and support organizational initiatives to prevent adverse events.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Stronger participation and leadership of specialized nurses in initiatives to improve patient safety culture requires appropriate investments and support by policy makers and managers in terms of resources and training.

IMPACT

There is a gap in existing literature on the contribution that specialized nurses can make in promoting patient safety culture. Review results highlight the importance of interprofessional collaboration and teamwork by involving specialized nurses. They inform healthcare policy makers about recognizing their roles and competencies in patient safety culture. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. No patient or public contribution.

Utilizing Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in Academic Emergency Departments Does Not Reduce Residents' Exposure to More Complex Patients

BACKGROUND

Whether integration of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) into academic emergency departments (EDs) affects emergency medicine (EM) resident clinical learning opportunities is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare EM resident exposure to more-complex patients, as well as patients undergoing Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-required procedures, at nonpediatric academic EDs with lower, moderate, and higher levels of NP/PA utilization.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) data for 2016-2020, nonpediatric academic EDs were classified into the following three groups based on the percentage of patients seen by an NP or PA: lower (≤ 10%), moderate (10.1-30%), and higher (> 30%) NP/PA utilization. The proportion of EM resident-seen patients meeting previously established complex patient criteria was then determined for EDs at each level of NP/PA utilization. The proportion of EM resident-seen patients receiving certain ACGME-required procedures was also determined. Survey analytic procedures and weighting as recommended by NHAMCS were used to calculate and compare proportions using 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The weighted 2016-2020 NHAMCS data sets represent 44,130,996 adult resident-seen patients presenting to nonpediatric academic EDs. The proportion of resident-seen patients meeting complex patient criteria did not significantly differ for lower (43.2%; 95% CI 30.6-56.8%), moderate (41.7%; 95% CI 33.0-50.9%), or higher (38.9%; 95% CI 29.3-49.4%) NP/PA utilization EDs. The proportion of patients undergoing an ACGME-required procedure also did not significantly differ across level of NP/PA utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of NP/PA utilization in nonpediatric academic EDs do not appear to reduce EM resident exposure to more-complex patients or ACGME-required procedures.

Practice as you Teach: Comparing Ordering Practices Between Shared and Physician-Only Visits in Academically Affiliated Community Emergency Departments

BACKGROUND

Considerable variability exists in emergency physicians' (EPs) rates of resource utilization, which may cluster in distinct patterns. However, previous studies have focused on academic and tertiary care centers, and it is unclear whether similar patterns exist in community practice.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine whether EPs practicing in community emergency departments (EDs) have practice patterns similar to those of academic EDs. Secondarily, we sought to investigate the effects of shared visits with advanced practice professionals and residents.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of two community EDs affiliated with an academic network. There were 62,860 visits among 50 EPs analyzed from October 1, 2018 through January 31, 2020 for rates of advanced imaging, admission, and shared visits. To classify practice patterns, we used a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), with groups and covariance determined by Bayesian Information Criteria.

RESULTS

Our GMM revealed three groups. The largest had homogeneous patterns of resource use (n = 28; 50% were female; years of experience: 7; interquartile range [IQR] 2-11; advanced imaging: 28%; admission: 19%; shared: 34%), a small group with lower resource use (n = 4; 0% were female; years of experience: 6; IQR 4-10; advanced imaging: 28%; admission: 16%; shared: 8%), and a modest high-resource group (n = 18; 28% female; years of experience: 5; IQR 2-16; advanced imaging: 34%; admission: 23%; shared: 43%). Rates of shared visits had little direct correlation with imaging (r2 = 0.045) or admission (r2 = 0.093), and rates of imaging and admission were weakly correlated (r2 = 0.242).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that community EPs may have multiple patterns of resource use, similar to those in academic EDs.

Characterizing malpractice cases involving emergency department advanced practice providers, physicians in training, and attending physicians

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate available characteristics and financial costs of malpractice cases among advanced practice providers (APPs; nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]), trainees (medical students, residents, fellows), and attending physicians.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of claims occurring in the emergency department (ED) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, contained in the Candello database. Cases were classified according to the provider type(s) involved: NP, PA, trainee, or cases that did not identify an extender as being substantially involved in the adverse event that resulted in the case ("no extender").

RESULTS

There were 5854 cases identified with a total gross indemnity paid of $1,007,879,346. Of these cases, 193 (3.3%) involved an NP, 513 (8.8%) involved a PA, 535 (9.1%) involved a trainee, and 4568 (78.0%) were no extender. Cases where a trainee was involved account for the highest average gross indemnity paid whereas no-extender cases are the lowest. NP and PA cases differed by contributing factors compared to no-extender cases: clinical judgment (NP 89.1% vs. no extender 76.8%, p < 0.0001; PA 84.6% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001), documentation (NP 23.3% vs. no extender 17.8%, p = 0.0489; PA 25.9% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001), and supervision (NP 22.3% vs. no extender 1.8%, p < 0.0001; PA 25.7% vs. no extender p < 0.0001). Cases involving NPs and PAs had a lower percentage of high-severity cases such as loss of limb or death (NP 45.6% vs. no extender 50.2%, p = 0.0004; PA 48.3% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

APPs and trainees comprise approximately 21% of malpractice cases and 33% of total gross indemnity paid in this large national ED data set. Understanding differences in characteristics of malpractice claims that occur in emergency care settings can be used to help to mitigate provider risk.

Analysis of nurse practitioner practice in US emergency departments: Evidence supporting educational preparation, credentialing, scope of practice, and outcomes

ABSTRACT

The nurse practitioner (NP) role within emergency care has grown in recent years and now there are an estimated 25,000 NPs employed in diverse emergency care settings. Despite this significant growth and expansion of the NP within emergency care areas, challenges exist. In addition to the pervasive confusion regarding the NP role in emergency care, data and statistics detailing characteristics and outcomes of NP practice in emergency care are either lacking or misrepresented. This article explores barriers and provides current and accurate information describing the current educational preparation, credentialing, scope of practice, and outcomes among NPs in US emergency departments. The totality of available evidence reviewed supports safe, timely, efficient, and patient-centered care provided by NPs in emergency care.

Paired analysis of ED efficiency for low-acuity children treated by PAs and pediatricians

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there was a clinically important difference (15 minutes or more) in length of stay (LOS) for low-acuity pediatric ED patients treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians.

METHODS

Between July 2017 and February 2020, shifts were identified that had shared PA and pediatrician staffing in the low-acuity care area for a large, urban ED. LOS was collected for every patient during the 6 hours of overlap for each shift. Using a paired analysis, we calculated the difference in mean LOS for these shifts.

RESULTS

Mean shift LOS for children seen by PAs (160.1 minutes, SD: 48.6) was 10.1 minutes longer (95% CI: 6.1, 14.1) than mean shift LOS for children seen by pediatricians (150 minutes, SD: 47.3).

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically important difference in LOS was found for low-acuity children treated by PAs compared with those treated by pediatricians in a large, urban ED.

Definitions and factors associated with emergency physician productivity: a scoping review

PURPOSE

There currently exists no standard productivity measure for emergency physicians. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesize the literature to identify components of definitions and measurements of emergency physician productivity and to evaluate factors associated with productivity.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest One Business from inception to May 2022. We included all studies that reported on emergency physician productivity. We excluded studies that only reported departmental productivity, studies with non-emergency providers, review articles, case reports, and editorials. Data were extracted into predefined worksheets and a descriptive summary was presented. Quality analysis was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

After screening 5521 studies, 44 studies met full inclusion criteria. Components of the definition for emergency physician productivity included: number of patients managed, revenue generated, patient processing time, and a standardization factor. Most studies measured productivity using patients per hour, relative value units per hour, and provider-to-disposition time. The most studied factors influencing productivity included scribes, resident learners, electronic medical record implementation, and faculty teaching scores.

CONCLUSION

Emergency physician productivity is heterogeneously defined, but includes common elements such as patient volume, complexity, and processing time. Commonly reported productivity metrics include patients per hour and relative value units that incorporate patient volume and complexity, respectively. The findings of this scoping review can guide ED physicians and administrators to measure the impact of QI initiatives, promote efficient patient care, and optimize physician staffing.

Rising high-acuity emergency care services independently billed by advanced practice providers, 2013 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Advanced practice providers (APPs) comprise an increasing proportion of the emergency medicine (EM) workforce, particularly in rural geographies. With little known regarding potential expanding practice patterns, we sought to evaluate trends in independent emergency care services billed by APPs from 2013 to 2019.

METHODS

We performed a repeated cross-sectional analysis of emergency clinicians independently reimbursed for at least 50 evaluation and management (E/M) services (99281-99285, 99291) from Medicare Part B, with high-acuity services including Codes 99285 and 99291. We describe the outcome proportion of E/M services by acuity level and report at (1) the encounter level and (2) at the clinician level. We stratified analyses by clinician type and geography.

RESULTS

A total of 47,323 EM physicians, 10,555 non-EM physicians, and 26,599 APPs were included in analyses. APPs billed emergency care services independently for 5.1% (rural 7.3%, urban 4.8%) of all high-acuity encounters in 2013, increasing to 9.7% (rural 16.4%, urban 8.8%) by 2019. At the clinician level, in 2013, the average rural-practicing APP independently billed 22.8% of services as high acuity, 72.6% as moderate acuity, and 4.5% as low acuity. By 2019, the average rural-practicing APP independently billed 36.2% of services as high acuity, representing a +58.8% relative increase from 2013. Relative increases in high-acuity visits independently billed by APPs were substantially greater when compared to EM physicians across both rural and urban geographies.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2019, APPs billed independent services for approximately one in six high-acuity ED encounters in rural geographies and one in 11 high-acuity ED encounters in urban geographies, and well over one-third of the average APPs' encounters were for high-acuity E/M services. Given differences in training and reimbursement between clinician types, these estimates suggest further work is needed evaluating emergency care staffing decision making.

Comparison of emergency department workloads before and during the COVID-19 pandemic as assessed using relative value units

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess and compare emergency department (ED) workloads by using relative value units (RVUs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study investigated the RVUs of a single ED from 2019 to 2021. We calculated the mean number of patients per day (PPD) for each year and selected the days when the number of patients was equal to the yearly mean PPD for each of the three years. We calculated the total RVUs per day and RVUs per patient and compared them.

RESULTS

We analyzed the RVUs of 12 days in 2019 (mean PPD, 88), 10 days in 2020 (mean PPD, 75), and 14 days in 2021 (mean PPD, 83). The mean of the total RVUs per day were as follows: 533,057.5±66,239.1 in 2019, 505,994.6±48,935.4 in 2020, and 634,219.6±64,024.2 in 2021 (P<0.001). The RVUs per patient in the three year-groups were significantly different (6,057.5±752.7 in 2019, 6,746.6±652.5 in 2020, and 7,641.2±771.4 in 2021; P<0.001). Post hoc analyses indicated that the total RVUs per day and the RVUs per patient in 2021 were significantly higher than in 2019 or 2020, although the mean PPD in 2019 was the highest.

CONCLUSION

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean RVUs per patient have increased, suggesting that the workload per patient may also have increased in the regional emergency medical center.

Engaging nurse practitioners and physician assistants to improve patient care and drive productivity in a radiology consult practice at a comprehensive cancer center

BACKGROUND

The demand for health care in the United States is increasing because of an aging population and an increase in the number of individuals insured. This has led to requests to revamp the primary care infrastructure fundamentally.

LOCAL PROBLEM

The optimal use of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) is still a subject of debate, but recently, it was reported that for many medical conditions, NP and PA-managed care outcomes are consistent with physician-managed care outcomes.

METHODS

Radiologists' productivity was measured according to relative value units (RVUs)/shift and professional billing changes. Patient care metrics measured were prescribed protocol to patient appointment lead time and number of same-day prescribed imaging protocol changes.

INTERVENTIONS

The focus was on radiologists' productivity and patient care for three months before and three months after integrating NP and PA into our abdominal radiology consult service.

RESULTS

We observed significant increases in the mean RVUs/shift (15.2 ± 0.9 vs. 6.2 ± 1.8; p = .02), studies read per shift (10.1 ± 0.5 vs. 4.4 ± 1.5; p = .003), revenue per shift hour ($756.20 ± 55.40 vs. $335.40 ± 32.60; p = .007), and protocol prescription to patient appointment lead time (39.3 ± 6.7 days vs. 16.3 ± 2.9 days; p = .005) and saw significant decreases in the mean prescribed CT (19.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.3 ± 0.6; p = .001) and MRI (11.7 ± 0.6 vs. 8.30 ± 0.12; p = .011) same day protocol changes in NP and PA integrated workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that NP and PA can be effectively integrated into the abdominal radiology consult service, increasing radiologists' productivity and enhancing clinical care.

PAs and NPs improve patient care and productivity in a radiology consult practice

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects on efficiency and patient care of the addition of physician assistants (PAs) and NPs to the abdominal radiology consult service.

METHODS

We obtained radiologist productivity and patient care metrics for 3 months before and 3 months after the integration of PAs and NPs into our consult service.

RESULTS

Integrating PAs and NPs into the workflow led to a significant increase in mean RVUs/shift (15.2 ± 0.9 versus 6.2 ± 1.8; P = .02), number of studies read per shift (10.1 ± 0.5 versus 4.4 ± 1.5; P = .003), revenue per shift hour ($756.20 ± $55.40 versus $335.40 ± $132.60; P = .007), protocol prescription to patient appointment lead time (39.3 ± 6.7 versus 16.3 ± 2.9 days; P = .005), and significant decreases in mean CT (19.3% ± 0.6 versus 3.3% ± 0.6; P = .001) and MRI (11.7% ± 0.6 versus 8.3% ± 0.12; P = .011) same-day protocol changes as patient appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

PAs and NPs can be effectively integrated into abdominal radiology consult service, increasing the productivity of radiologists, and enhancing clinical care.

Evaluation of advanced practice provider related return visits to a pediatric emergency department and their outcomes

BACKGROUND

While multiple studies have evaluated physician-related return visits (RVs) to a pediatric emergency department (PED) limited data exists for Advanced Practice Provider (APP)-related RVs, hence our study aimed to evaluate APP-related RVs and their outcomes in a PED.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 72-h RVs where clinical care was independently provided by an APP during the index visit from January 2018 to December 2019. We extracted patient demographics, index and return visits' characteristics and outcomes. Reasons for RVs were categorized as progression of illness, medication-related, callbacks and others. Index visits were assessed for any diagnostic errors; impact of which to the patient was classified as none, minor or major.

RESULTS

Our APP-related RV rate was 2.1% (653/30,328). 462 eligible RVs were included in the final analysis. Majority of RVs were for medical reasons (n = 442, 95.7%); lower acuity (Emergency Severity Index ≥3, n = 426, 92.2%); due to persistence/progression of illness (n = 403; 87.2%) with viral illness being the common diagnosis (n = 159; 34.4%). 12 (2.6%) RVs were secondary to callbacks (8 radiology callbacks; 4 false positive blood cultures). Diagnostic errors were noted in 14 (3%) encounters of which 3 resulted in a major impact; radiological (7 fractures) and ophthalmological (2 corneal abrasions and 2 foreign bodies) misses constituted the majority of these.

CONCLUSIONS

APP-related RVs for low acuity medical patients remain low and are associated with good outcomes. Diagnostic errors account for a minority of these RVs. Focused interventions targeting provider errors can further decrease these RVs.

Hospital Occupancy and its Effect on Emergency Department Evaluation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine whether hospital occupancy was associated with increased testing and treatment during emergency department (ED) evaluations, resulting in reduced admissions.

METHODS

We analyzed the electronic health records of an urban academic ED. We linked data from all ED visits from October 1, 2010, to May 29, 2015, with daily hospital occupancy (inpatients/total staffed beds). Outcome measures included the frequency of laboratory testing, advanced imaging, medication administration, and hospitalizations. We modeled each outcome using multivariable negative binomial or logistic regression, as appropriate, and examined their association with daily hospital occupancy quartiles, controlling for patient and visit characteristics. We calculated the adjusted outcome rates and relative changes at each daily hospital occupancy quartile using marginal estimating methods.

RESULTS

We included 270,434 ED visits with a mean patient age of 48.1 (standard deviation 19.8) years; 40.1% were female, 22.8% were non-Hispanic Black, and 51.5% were commercially insured. Hospital occupancy was not associated with differences in laboratory testing, advanced imaging, or medication administration. Compared with the first quartile, the third and fourth quartiles of daily hospital occupancy were associated with decreases of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.9 to -0.2; absolute change -0.6 percentage points [95% CI -1.2 to -0.1]) and 4.6% (95% CI -6.0 to -3.2; absolute change -1.9 percentage points [95% CI -2.5 to -1.3]) in hospitalizations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The lack of association between hospital occupancy and laboratory testing, advanced imaging, and medication administration suggest that changes in ED testing or treatment did not facilitate the decrease in admissions during periods of high hospital occupancy.

Alignment of Nurse Practitioner Educational Preparation and Scope of Practice in United States Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

National debate persists surrounding the expanded use of nurse practitioners in the emergency department. Current understanding of the alignment of nurse practitioner educational preparation and practice parameters in United States emergency departments is inchoate. The objective of this review was to seek evidence to support that nurse practitioner education and training align with current practices in the emergency department.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided systematic review of the existing literature was conducted of 4 relevant databases. Level of evidence and quality assignments were made for each article using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research as appropriate.

RESULTS

Nurse practitioners are increasingly staffing emergency departments, providing care to both patients classified as high-acuity and low-acuity. Reports of nurse practitioner scope of practice vary widely. No studies evaluated alignment of educational preparation and training for actual clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

This review of the literature was inconclusive, and the review team we was unable to find evidence that supports the alignment of nurse practitioner educational preparation and training with scope of clinical practice in United States emergency departments. Future research should seek to articulate the landscape of nurse practitioner academic preparation for specialty practice in the emergency department and to specifically examine the alignment of educational preparation with scope of practice and impact on clinical outcomes of patients seen in the emergency department.

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Economics of United States Emergency Care

Study objective

We describe how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the economics of emergency department care (ED).

Methods

We conducted an observational study of 136 EDs from January 2019 to September 2020, using 2020-to-2019 3-week moving ratios for ED visits, complexity, revenue, and staffing expenses. We tabulated 2020-to-2019 staffing ratios and calculated hour and full-time-equivalent changes.

Results

Following the COVID-19 pandemic’s onset, geriatric (age ≥65), adult (age 18 to 64), and pediatric (age <18) ED visits declined by 43%, 40%, and 73%, respectively, compared to 2019 visits and rose thereafter but remained below 2019 levels through September. Relative value units per visit rose by 8%, 9%, and 18%, respectively, compared to 2019, while ED admission rates rose by 32%. Both fell subsequently but remained above 2019 levels through September. Revenues dropped sharply early in the pandemic and rose gradually but remained below 2019 levels. In medium and large EDs, staffing and expenses were lowered with a lag, largely compensating for lower revenue at these sites, and barely at freestanding EDs. Staffing and expense reductions could not match revenue losses in smaller EDs. During the pandemic, emergency physician and advanced practice provider clinical hours and compensation fell 15% and 27%, respectively, corresponding to 174 lost physician and 193 lost advanced practice provider full-time-equivalent positions.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted the economics of ED care, with large drops in overall and, in particular, low-acuity ED visits, necessitating reductions in clinical hours. Staffing cutbacks could not match reduced revenue at small EDs with minimum emergency physician coverage requirements.

Emergency Physician and Advanced Practice Provider Diagnostic Testing and Admission Decisions in Chest Pain and Abdominal Pain

OBJECTIVE

We compare utilization of diagnostic resources and admissions in emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain and abdominal pain when managed by advanced practice providers (APPs) and physicians.

METHODS

We used 2016 to 2019 data from a national emergency medicine group. We compared visits managed by physicians and APPs based on demographics and observed resource utilization (labs, radiography, computed tomography) use and hospital admission/transfer, stratified by patient age. To reduce selection bias, we created inverse propensity score weights (IPWs). To estimate the average treatment effect for APP visits for each outcome, we included IPWs in a multivariable linear probability model with a dummy variable indicating treatment by an APP and used a facility fixed effect. We then estimated the average treatment effect comparing physician to APP visit for all visits and for discharged visits separately, stratified by the study outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed using different cohort definitions and adjusting for past medical history.

RESULTS

In chest pain, we included 77,568 visits seen by 1,011 APPs and 586,031 visits seen by 1,588 physicians. In abdominal pain, we included 184,812 ED visits seen by 1,080 APPs and 761,230 visits seen by 1,689 physicians. For both chest pain and abdominal pain visits, physicians saw more older adult patients (55+ years) and admitted a higher percentage of visits than APPs. For chest pain, physicians saw more circulatory system diseases (70.7% vs. 58.6%); APPs saw more respiratory system diseases (17.1% vs. 9.8%). In abdominal pain, emergency physicians saw more digestive system diseases (28.5% vs. 23.3%); APPs saw more genitourinary system diseases. After matching with IPW, predicted probabilities of laboratory, radiology, and admissions either did not vary or were slightly lower for APPs compared to physicians for all outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results, including controlling for past medical history.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic testing and hospitalization rates for chest pain and abdominal pain between APPs and physicians is largely similar after matching for severity and complexity. This suggests that APPs do not have observably higher use of ED and hospital resources in these conditions in this national group.