1
|
Punia K, Scott W, Manuja K, Sabbineni M, Campbell K, Balodis IM, MacKillop J. SAEM GRACE: Anti-craving medications for alcohol use disorder treatment in the emergency department: A systematic review of direct evidence. Acad Emerg Med 2024; 31:504-514. [PMID: 37735346 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Alcohol-related concerns commonly present to the emergency department (ED), with a subset of individuals experiencing the symptoms of an alcohol use disorder (AUD). As such, examining the efficacy of pharmacological anti-craving treatment for AUD in the ED is of increasing interest. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the direct evidence assessing the efficacy of providing anti-craving medications for AUD treatment in the ED. METHODS A systematic search was conducted according to the patient-intervention-control-outcome question: (P) adults (≥18 years old) presenting to the ED with an AUD (including suspected AUD); (I) anti-craving medications (i.e., naltrexone, acamprosate, gabapentin); (C) no prescription or placebo; (O) reduction of repeat ED visits, engagement in addiction services, reductions in heavy drinking days, reductions in any drinking and amount consumed (or abstinence), and in relapse. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and conducted risk of bias assessments for included studies. RESULTS From 143 potentially relevant articles, 6 met inclusion criteria: 3 clinical trials, and 3 case studies. The clinical trials identified evaluated oral versus extended-release naltrexone, monthly extended-release naltrexone injections, and disulfiram. Both oral and extended-release naltrexone resulted in decreased alcohol consumption. Monthly extended-release naltrexone injections resulted in significant improvements in drinking and quality of life. Although out of scope, the disulfiram studies identified did not result in an improvement in drinking in comparison to no medication. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there are few studies directly examining the efficacy of anti-craving medications for AUD in the ED, although the limited evidence that exists is supportive of naltrexone pharmacotherapy, particularly extended-release injection formulation. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary for substantive direct evidence on anti-craving medication initiation in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Punia
- Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Scott
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kriti Manuja
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monica Sabbineni
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Iris M Balodis
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - James MacKillop
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Punia K, Scott W, Manuja K, Campbell K, Balodis IM, MacKillop J. SAEM GRACE: Phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal management in the emergency department: A systematic review of direct evidence. Acad Emerg Med 2024; 31:481-492. [PMID: 37589203 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a commonly presenting condition in the emergency department (ED) and can have severe complications, including mortality. Benzodiazepines are first-line medications for treating AWS but may be unavailable or insufficient. This systematic review evaluates the direct evidence assessing the utility of phenobarbital for treating AWS in the ED. METHODS A systematic search was conducted and designed according to the patient-intervention-comparator-outcome (PICO) question: (P) adults (≥18 years old) presenting to the ED with alcohol withdrawal; (I) phenobarbital (including adjunctive); (C) benzodiazepines or no intervention; and (O) AWS complications, admission to a monitored setting, control of symptoms, adverse effects, and adjunctive medications. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and conducted risk of bias assessments for included studies. RESULTS From 70 potentially relevant articles, seven studies met inclusion criteria: three retrospective cohort studies, two retrospective chart reviews, and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one examining phenobarbital monotherapy and one examining adjunctive phenobarbital. Across the retrospective cohort studies, treatment of AWS with phenobarbital resulted in lower odds of a subsequent ED visit. The retrospective chart reviews indicated that phenobarbital was associated with higher discharge rate compared to benzodiazepine-only treatments. For the two RCTs, phenobarbital did not differ significantly from benzodiazepine for most outcomes, although concomitant treatment with phenobarbital was associated with lower benzodiazepine use and intensive care unit admission. The heterogeneous designs and small number of studies prevented quantitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS Relatively few studies provide direct evidence on the utility of phenobarbital for AWS in the ED, but the evidence that exists generally suggests that it is a reasonable and appropriate approach. Additional RCTs and other methodologically rigorous investigations are needed for more definitive direct evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Punia
- Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Ontario, Hamilton, Canada
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Scott
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kriti Manuja
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Iris M Balodis
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - James MacKillop
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliveira J E Silva L, Bellolio F, Carpenter CR. Clinical relevance rather than evidence existence: The SAEM GRACE pragmatism. Acad Emerg Med 2024; 31:529-532. [PMID: 38594826 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fernanda Bellolio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gettel CJ, Galske J, Sather AR, Haidous AK, Hwang U, Brackett AL, Venkatesh AK, Rising KL, Goldberg EM, van Oppen JD, Conroy SP, Carpenter CR. Patient-reported outcome measure use among older adults after emergency department care: A systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2024; 31:273-287. [PMID: 38366698 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are gaining favor in clinical and research settings given their ability to capture a patient's symptom burden, functional status, and quality of life. Our objective in this systematic review was to summarize studies including PROMs assessed among older adults (age ≥ 65 years) after seeking emergency care. METHODS With the assistance of a medical librarian, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science-Core Collection, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception through June 2023 for studies in which older adult ED patients had PROMs assessed in the post-emergency care time period. Independent reviewers performed title/abstract review, full-text screening, data extraction, study characteristic summarization, and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessments. RESULTS Our search strategy yielded 5153 studies of which 56 met study inclusion criteria. Within included studies, 304 unique PROM assessments were performed at varying time points after the ED visit, including 61 unique PROMs. The most commonly measured domain was physical function, assessed within the majority of studies (47/56; 84%), with measures including PROMs such as Katz activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, and the Barthel Index. PROMs were most frequently assessed at 1-3 months after an ED visit (113/304; 37%), greater than 6 months (91/304; 30%), and 4-6 months (88/304; 29%), with very few PROMs assessed within 1 month of the ED visit (12/304; 4%). Of the 16 interventional studies, two were determined to have a low RoB, four had moderate RoB, nine had high RoB, and one had insufficient information. Of the 40 observational studies, 10 were determined to be of good quality, 20 of moderate quality, and 10 of poor quality. CONCLUSIONS PROM assessments among older adults following an ED visit frequently measured physical function, with very few assessments occurring within the first 1 month after an ED visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James Galske
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Ali K Haidous
- University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Alexandria L Brackett
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kristin L Rising
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- College of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Goldberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - James D van Oppen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Simon P Conroy
- Medical Research Council Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edlow JA, Carpenter C, Akhter M, Khoujah D, Marcolini E, Meurer WJ, Morrill D, Naples JG, Ohle R, Omron R, Sharif S, Siket M, Upadhye S, E Silva LOJ, Sundberg E, Tartt K, Vanni S, Newman-Toker DE, Bellolio F. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE-3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:442-486. [PMID: 37166022 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
This third Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-3) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic adult patients with acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department (ED). A multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding five questions for adult ED patients with acute dizziness of less than 2 weeks' duration. The intended population is adults presenting to the ED with acute dizziness or vertigo. The panel derived 15 evidence-based recommendations based on the timing and triggers of the dizziness but recognizes that alternative diagnostic approaches exist, such as the STANDING protocol and nystagmus examination in combination with gait unsteadiness or the presence of vascular risk factors. As an overarching recommendation, (1) emergency clinicians should receive training in bedside physical examination techniques for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (AVS; HINTS) and the diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV; Dix-Hallpike test and Epley maneuver). To help distinguish central from peripheral causes in patients with the AVS, we recommend: (2) use HINTS (for clinicians trained in its use) in patients with nystagmus, (3) use finger rub to further aid in excluding stroke in patients with nystagmus, (4) use severity of gait unsteadiness in patients without nystagmus, (5) do not use brain computed tomography (CT), (6) do not use routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a first-line test if a clinician trained in HINTS is available, and (7) use MRI as a confirmatory test in patients with central or equivocal HINTS examinations. In patients with the spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome: (8) search for symptoms or signs of cerebral ischemia, (9) do not use CT, and (10) use CT angiography or MRI angiography if there is concern for transient ischemic attack. In patients with the triggered (positional) episodic vestibular syndrome, (11) use the Dix-Hallpike test to diagnose posterior canal BPPV (pc-BPPV), (12) do not use CT, and (13) do not use MRI routinely, unless atypical clinical features are present. In patients diagnosed with vestibular neuritis, (14) consider short-term steroids as a treatment option. In patients diagnosed with pc-BPPV, (15) treat with the Epley maneuver. It is clear that as of 2023, when applied in routine practice by emergency clinicians without special training, HINTS testing is inaccurate, partly due to use in the wrong patients and partly due to issues with its interpretation. Most emergency physicians have not received training in use of HINTS. As such, it is not standard of care, either in the legal sense of that term ("what the average physician would do in similar circumstances") or in the common parlance sense ("the standard action typically used by physicians in routine practice").
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Edlow
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Murtaza Akhter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State School of Medicine, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
- Hershey Medical Center, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Danya Khoujah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Adventhealth Tampa, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Evie Marcolini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - William J Meurer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - James G Naples
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert Ohle
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- Health Science North Research Institute, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rodney Omron
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sameer Sharif
- Division of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matt Siket
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Robert Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Suneel Upadhye
- Emergency Medicine, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
- Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lucas Oliveira J E Silva
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Etta Sundberg
- COO Royal Oasis Pool and Spas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Karen Tartt
- Absinthe Brasserie & Bar, San Francisco, California, USA
- St. George Spirits, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Simone Vanni
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - David E Newman-Toker
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fernanda Bellolio
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bellolio F, Broder JS, Oliveira J E Silva L, Freiermuth CE, Hooker E, Jang TB, Griffey RT, Meltzer AC, Mills AM, Pepper J, Prakken S, Repplinger MD, Upadhye S, Carpenter CR. Reply to "Letter to the Editor, re: GRACE-2: Low-Risk, Recurrent Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department". Acad Emerg Med 2022; 29:1148-1150. [PMID: 35848885 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Bellolio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Joshua S Broder
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Caroline E Freiermuth
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Edmond Hooker
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Timothy B Jang
- Department of Health Services Administration, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard T Griffey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - Andrew C Meltzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Angela M Mills
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joan Pepper
- Patient representative, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Michael D Repplinger
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Suneel Upadhye
- Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher R Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|