1
|
Meyer GM, Hollunder B, Li N, Butenko K, Dembek TA, Hart L, Nombela C, Mosley P, Akram H, Acevedo N, Borron BM, Chou T, Castaño Montoya JP, Strange B, Barcia JA, Tyagi H, Castle DJ, Smith AH, Choi KS, Kopell BH, Mayberg HS, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Leentjens AFG, Richardson RM, Rossell SL, Bosanac P, Cosgrove GR, Kuhn J, Visser-Vandewalle V, Figee M, Dougherty DD, Siddiqi SH, Zrinzo L, Joyce E, Baldermann JC, Fox MD, Neudorfer C, Horn A. Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Optimal Stimulation Sites. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 96:101-113. [PMID: 38141909 PMCID: PMC11190041 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment option for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Several stimulation targets have been used, mostly in and around the anterior limb of the internal capsule and ventral striatum. However, the precise target within this region remains a matter of debate. METHODS Here, we retrospectively studied a multicenter cohort of 82 patients with OCD who underwent DBS of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum and mapped optimal stimulation sites in this region. RESULTS DBS sweet-spot mapping performed on a discovery set of 58 patients revealed 2 optimal stimulation sites associated with improvements on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, one in the anterior limb of the internal capsule that overlapped with a previously identified OCD-DBS response tract and one in the region of the inferior thalamic peduncle and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Critically, the nucleus accumbens proper and anterior commissure were associated with beneficial but suboptimal clinical improvements. Moreover, overlap with the resulting sweet- and sour-spots significantly estimated variance in outcomes in an independent cohort of 22 patients from 2 additional DBS centers. Finally, beyond obsessive-compulsive symptoms, stimulation of the anterior site was associated with optimal outcomes for both depression and anxiety, while the posterior site was only associated with improvements in depression. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest how to refine targeting of DBS in OCD and may be helpful in guiding DBS programming in existing patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garance M Meyer
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Barbara Hollunder
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lauren Hart
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina Nombela
- Biological and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philip Mosley
- Clinical Brain Networks Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Neurosciences Queensland, St. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Health and Biosecurity, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Harith Akram
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Acevedo
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin M Borron
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tina Chou
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juan Pablo Castaño Montoya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bryan Strange
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan A Barcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Himanshu Tyagi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Castle
- University of Tasmania and Centre for Mental Health Service Innovation, Tasmania, Australia; State-wide Mental Health Service, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Andrew H Smith
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Brian H Kopell
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Albert F G Leentjens
- Department of Psychiatry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan L Rossell
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Bosanac
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jens Kuhn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Johanniter Hospital Oberhausen, EVKLN, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martijn Figee
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Joyce
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Carlos Baldermann
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael D Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andreas Horn
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdulrazeq H, Philips AP, Sastry R, Lauro PM, McLaughlin NCR, Asaad WF. The persistent value of lesions in psychiatric neurosurgery. Lancet Psychiatry 2024:S2215-0366(24)00115-9. [PMID: 38906167 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00115-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Neurosurgery for intractable psychiatric conditions has seen a resurgence with the increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Although DBS promises reversible neuromodulation and has become more popular than older lesioning methods, lesioning might still be preferred in specific cases. Here, we review the evidence for DBS and lesions in the treatment of intractable neuropsychiatric conditions and consider the factors that favour the continued use of lesioning procedures in appropriately selected cases. Broadly, systemic factors including comparative effectiveness, cost, and ethical arguments support an ongoing role for lesioning. Such a role is also supported by practical considerations including patient experiences of this type of therapy, the relative intensity of follow-up care, access to sparse or specialised follow-up care, and relative infection risk. Overall, we argue that neurosurgical lesion procedures remain an important alternative to DBS and their continued availability is necessary to fulfil the imperatives of mental health parity and enhance access to effective mental health treatments. Nonetheless, the efficacy of DBS and recent advances in closed-loop stimulation and remote programming might provide solutions to some of the challenges associated with wider use of electrical neuromodulation. Concerns about the scarcity of high-level evidence for the efficacy of lesioning procedures as well as the potential irreversible adverse effects of lesioning remain to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hael Abdulrazeq
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Alexander P Philips
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Rahul Sastry
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Peter M Lauro
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicole C R McLaughlin
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Wael F Asaad
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elsouri KN, Heiser SE, Cabrera D, Alqurneh S, Hawat J, Demory ML. Management and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Literature Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e60496. [PMID: 38883111 PMCID: PMC11180522 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and debilitating mental health condition. This literature review examines the latest strategies in managing and treating OCD, with an emphasis on psychotherapy, pharmacological interventions, and neurosurgical options. A comprehensive literature search utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalKey, and Embase databases was conducted. Utilizing chosen keywords, the resulting articles were filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included articles were used to discuss current research regarding OCD treatment and management. Findings reveal the efficacy and obstacles of treatments such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and evidence-based neurosurgical methods, offering a broad perspective on OCD management. We discuss the limitations of these established treatments and examine the innovative response of neurosurgery in treating patients with OCD. This review highlights the importance of individualized treatment plans and areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kawther N Elsouri
- Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Samantha E Heiser
- Osteopathic Medicine, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA
- Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Dominick Cabrera
- Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Sami Alqurneh
- Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Jaime Hawat
- Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Michelle L Demory
- Immunology, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mar-Barrutia L, Ibarrondo O, Mar J, Real E, Segalàs C, Bertolín S, Aparicio MA, Plans G, Menchón JM, Alonso P. Sex differences in clinical response to deep brain stimulation in resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH 2024:S2950-2853(24)00013-9. [PMID: 38331320 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpmh.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective alternative to treat severe refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), although little is known on factors predicting response. The objective of this study was to explore potential sex differences in the pattern of response to DBS in OCD patients. METHODS We conducted a prospective observational study in 25 patients with severe resistant OCD. Response to treatment was defined as a ≥35% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score. Logistic regression models were calculated to measure the likelihood of response at short and long-term follow-up by sex as measured by Y-BOCS score. Similar analyses were carried out to study changes in depressive symptomatology assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Additionally, effect sizes were calculated to assess clinical significance. RESULTS We did not observe significant clinical differences between men and women prior to DBS implantation, nor in the response after one year of stimulation. At long-term follow-up, 76.9% of men could be considered responders to DBS versus only 33.3% of women. The final response odds ratio in men was 10.05 with significant confidence intervals (88.90-1.14). No other predictors of response were identified. The sex difference in Y-BOCS reduction was clinically significant, with an effect size of 3.2. The main limitation was the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that gender could influence the long-term response to DBS in OCD, a finding that needs to be confirmed in new studies given the paucity of results on predictors of response to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Mar-Barrutia
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Oliver Ibarrondo
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Debagoiena Integrated Health Organisation, Research Unit, Arrasate-Mondragón, Spain; Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Javier Mar
- Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Debagoiena Integrated Health Organisation, Research Unit, Arrasate-Mondragón, Spain; Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Eva Real
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cinto Segalàs
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Bertolín
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Gerard Plans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Manuel Menchón
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pino Alonso
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stip E, Javaid SF, Abdel Aziz K, Arnone D. Happy Birthday "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest": A Momentous Tale in the Quest for an Effective and Ethical Approach to Psychosurgery. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2023; 68:887-893. [PMID: 37424267 PMCID: PMC10657581 DOI: 10.1177/07067437231182658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The anniversary of the publication of 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' by Ken Kesey offers an opportunity for reflection on the use of neurosurgery in psychiatry. We used a narrative, historical and dialectical method to deliver an account of the controversial subject. A balanced representation of the negative and positive aspects, acknowledging some of the questionable ethical practices while describing well-reasoned applications is provided. It includes neurosurgeons, psychiatrists who have embraced these procedures with unwarranted enthusiasm and those who have opposed. Neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of severe mental disorders have evolved from rudimentary procedures which were used to 'correct' unwanted behaviours associated with a wide range of severe mental disorders to more refined and selective approaches used as a last resort to treat specific mental health conditions. In the absence of specific aetiological models to guide ablative surgical targets, non-ablative, stimulatory techniques have more recently been developed to allow reversibility when surgical treatment fails to obtain a sizeable improvement in quality of life. The subject is concretely illustrated by two eloquent clinical images: one on a series of brain computed tomography scans carried out on a Canadian population of subjects, who underwent leukotomy decades ago, and the other more contemporary on an implantation surgery to epidural stimulation. Alongside technical advances in psychosurgery, a regulatory framework has gradually developed to ensure vigilance in the appropriateness of patients' selection. Nevertheless, harmonisation of protocols around the world is necessary to ensure consistency in obtaining and maintaining the highest possible ethical standards for the benefit of patients. If the neurosciences promise today, in their new, better framed, and reversible applications, to provide answers to unmet therapeutic needs, we still must remain attentive to drifts linked the introduction of intrusive technologies for purposes of domination or behaviour modification that would impede our individual freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Stip
- Université de Montréal, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Behaviour Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - S. F. Javaid
- Department of Psychiatry and Behaviour Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - K. Abdel Aziz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behaviour Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - D. Arnone
- Department of Psychiatry and Behaviour Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdelnaim MA, Lang-Hambauer V, Hebel T, Schoisswohl S, Schecklmann M, Deuter D, Schlaier J, Langguth B. Deep brain stimulation for treatment resistant obsessive compulsive disorder; an observational study with ten patients under real-life conditions. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1242566. [PMID: 37779611 PMCID: PMC10533930 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1242566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects 2-3% of the global population, causing distress in many functioning levels. Standard treatments only lead to a partial recovery, and about 10% of the patients remain treatment-resistant. Deep brain stimulation offers a treatment option for severe, therapy-refractory OCD, with a reported response of about 60%. We report a comprehensive clinical, demographic, and treatment data for patients who were treated with DBS in our institution. Methods We offered DBS to patients with severe chronic treatment resistant OCD. Severity was defined as marked impairment in functioning and treatment resistance was defined as non-response to adequate trials of medications and psychotherapy. Between 2020 and 2022, 11 patients were implanted bilaterally in the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Patients were evaluated with YBOCS, MADRS, GAF, CGI, and WHOQOL-BREF. We performed the ratings at baseline (before surgery), after implantation before the start of the stimulation, after reaching satisfactory stimulation parameters, and at follow-up visits 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after optimized stimulation. Results One patient has retracted his consent to publish the results of his treatment, thus we are reporting the results of 10 patients (5 males, 5 females, mean age: 37 years). Out of our 10 patients, 6 have shown a clear response indicated by a YBOCS-reduction between 42 and 100 percent at last follow-up. One further patient experienced a subjectively dramatic effect on OCD symptoms, but opted afterwards to stop the stimulation. The other 3 patients showed a slight, non-significant improvement of YBOCS between 8.8 and 21.9%. The overall mean YBOCS decreased from 28.3 at baseline to 13.3 (53% reduction) at the last follow-up. The improvement of the OCD symptoms was also accompanied by an improvement of depressive symptoms, global functioning, and quality of life. Conclusion Our results suggest that BNST-DBS can be effective for treatment-resistant OCD patients, as indicated by a reduction in symptoms and an overall improvement in functioning. Despite the need for additional research to define the patients' selection criteria, the most appropriate anatomical target, and the most effective stimulation parameters, improved patient access for this therapy should be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A. Abdelnaim
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Verena Lang-Hambauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Schoisswohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schecklmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Deuter
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Juergen Schlaier
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asher R, Hyun I, Head M, Cosgrove GR, Silbersweig D. Neuroethical implications of focused ultrasound for neuropsychiatric illness. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:806-814. [PMID: 37150289 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MR-guided focused ultrasound is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant mental illness, and merits contextualized ethical exploration in relation to more extensive ethical literature regarding other psychosurgical and neuromodulation treatment options for this patient population. To our knowledge, this topic has not yet been explored in the published literature. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss in detail the neuroethical implications of MR-guided focused ultrasound for neuropsychiatric illness as an emerging treatment modality. METHODS Due to the lack of published literature on the topic, the approach involved a detailed survey and review of technical and medical literature relevant to focused ultrasound and established ethical issues related to alternative treatment options for patients with treatment-resistant, severe and persistent mental illness. The manuscript is structured according to thematic and topical findings. RESULTS This technology has potential benefits for patients suffering with severe mental illness, compared with established alternatives. The balance of technical, neuroscientific and clinical considerations should inform ethical deliberations. The nascent literature base, nuances in legal classification and permissibility depending upon jurisdiction, influences of past ethical issues associated with alternative treatments, tone and framing in media articles, and complexity of clinical trials all influence ethical assessment and evaluations of multiple stakeholders. Recommendations for future research are provided based on these factors. CONCLUSION Salient ethical inquiry should be further explored by researchers, clinicians, and ethicists in a nuanced manner methodologically, one which is informed by past and present ethical issues related to alternative treatment options, broader psychiatric treatment frameworks, pragmatic implementation challenges, intercultural considerations, and patients' ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Asher
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Center for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Mitchell Head
- Te Kotahi Research Institute/University of Waikato, Gate 4C, 194H Hillcrest Rd, Hillcrest, Hamilton, 3216, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - David Silbersweig
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hariz M. Pros and Cons of Ablation for Functional Neurosurgery in the Neurostimulation Age. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:291-299. [PMID: 36906335 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Should one recommend stereotactic ablation for Parkinson disease, tremor, dystonia, and obsessive compulsive disorder, in this era of DBS? The answer depends on several variables such as the symptoms to treat, the patient's preferences and expectations, the surgeons' competence and preference, the availability of financial means (by government health care, by private insurance), the geographical issues, and not least the current and dominating fashion at that particular time. Both ablation and stimulation can be either used alone or even combined (provided expertise in both of them) to treat various symptoms of movement and mind disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan Hariz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Umeå 90185, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Derksen M, Zuidinga B, van der Veer M, Rhemrev V, Jolink L, Reneman L, Nederveen A, Forstmann B, Feenstra M, Willuhn I, Denys D. A comparison of how deep brain stimulation in two targets with anti-compulsive efficacy modulates brain activity using fMRI in awake rats. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2023; 330:111611. [PMID: 36796237 DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established neuromodulatory intervention against otherwise treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Several DBS targets, all of which are part of brain networks connecting basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex, alleviate OCD symptoms. Stimulation of these targets is thought to unfold its therapeutic effect by modulation of network activity through internal capsule (IC) connections. Research into DBS-induced network changes and the nature of IC-related effects of DBS in OCD is needed to further improve DBS. Here, we studied the effects of DBS at the ventral medial striatum (VMS) and IC on blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses in awake rats using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). BOLD-signal intensity was measured in five regions of interest (ROIs): medial and orbital prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens (NAc), IC area, and mediodorsal thalamus. In previous rodent studies, stimulation at both target locations resulted in a reduction of OCD-like behavior and activation of prefrontal cortical areas. Therefore, we hypothesized that stimulation at both targets would result in partially overlapping BOLD responses. Both differential and overlapping activity between VMS and IC stimulation was found. Stimulating the caudal part of the IC resulted in activation around the electrode, while stimulating the rostral part of the IC resulted in increased cross-correlations between the IC area, orbitofrontal cortex, and NAc. Stimulation of the dorsal part of the VMS resulted in increased activity in the IC area, suggesting this area is activated during both VMS and IC stimulation. This activation is also indicative of VMS-DBS impacting corticofugal fibers running through the medial caudate into the anterior IC, and both VMS and IC DBS might act on these fibers to induce OCD-reducing effects. These results show that rodent fMRI with simultaneous electrode stimulation is a promising approach to study the neural mechanisms of DBS. Comparing the effects of DBS in different target areas has the potential to improve our understanding of the neuromodulatory changes that take place across various networks and connections in the brain. Performing this research in animal disease models will lead to translational insights in the mechanisms underlying DBS, and can aid improvement and optimization of DBS in patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maik Derksen
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birte Zuidinga
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke van der Veer
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valerie Rhemrev
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Jolink
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Reneman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart Nederveen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birte Forstmann
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Feenstra
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingo Willuhn
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Damiaan Denys
- The Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bandelow B, Allgulander C, Baldwin DS, Costa DLDC, Denys D, Dilbaz N, Domschke K, Hollander E, Kasper S, Möller HJ, Eriksson E, Fineberg NA, Hättenschwiler J, Kaiya H, Karavaeva T, Katzman MA, Kim YK, Inoue T, Lim L, Masdrakis V, Menchón JM, Miguel EC, Nardi AE, Pallanti S, Perna G, Rujescu D, Starcevic V, Stein DJ, Tsai SJ, Van Ameringen M, Vasileva A, Wang Z, Zohar J. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and posttraumatic stress disorders - Version 3. Part II: OCD and PTSD. World J Biol Psychiatry 2023; 24:118-134. [PMID: 35900217 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2022.2086296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM This is the third version of the guideline of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Task Force for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders which was published in 2002 and revised in 2008. METHOD A consensus panel of 34 international experts representing 22 countries developed recommendations based on efficacy and acceptability of the treatments. In this version, not only medications but also psychotherapies and other non-pharmacological interventions were evaluated, applying the same rigorous methods that are standard for the assessment of medication treatments. RESULT The present paper (Part II) contains recommendations based on published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of OCD (n = 291) and PTSD (n = 234) in children, adolescents, and adults. The accompanying paper (Part I) contains the recommendations for the treatment of anxiety disorders.For OCD, first-line treatments are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Internet-CBT was also superior to active controls. Several second-line medications are available, including clomipramine. For treatment-resistant cases, several options are available, including augmentation of SSRI treatment with antipsychotics and other drugs.Other non-pharmacological treatments, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and others were also evaluated.For PTSD, SSRIs and the SNRI venlafaxine are first-line treatments. CBT is the psychotherapy modality with the best body of evidence. For treatment-unresponsive patients, augmentation of SSRI treatment with antipsychotics may be an option. CONCLUSION OCD and PTSD can be effectively treated with CBT and medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borwin Bandelow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - David S Baldwin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lucas da Conceição Costa
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Afdeling Psychiatrie, Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nesrin Dilbaz
- Psikiyatri Uzmanı, Üsküdar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri ABD İstanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Katharina Domschke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Siegfried Kasper
- Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Medical, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hans-Jürgen Möller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of München, München, Germany
| | - Elias Eriksson
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Naomi A Fineberg
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hisanobu Kaiya
- Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto Prefactual Medical College, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tatiana Karavaeva
- V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Ministry of Health, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.,Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin A Katzman
- S.T.A.R.T. CLINIC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Adler Graduate Professional School Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Northern Ontario School of Medicine Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yong-Ku Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Takeshi Inoue
- Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Leslie Lim
- Department of Psychiatry, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vasilios Masdrakis
- First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - José M Menchón
- Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, Cibersam, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Euripedes C Miguel
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Antônio E Nardi
- Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Giampaolo Perna
- Department of Biological Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Dan Rujescu
- Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Medical, University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Vladan Starcevic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dan J Stein
- SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Shih-Jen Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Michael Van Ameringen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Vasileva
- V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Ministry of Health, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Zhen Wang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Graat I, Mocking RJT, Liebrand LC, van den Munckhof P, Bot M, Schuurman PR, Bergfeld IO, van Wingen G, Denys D. Tractography-based versus anatomical landmark-based targeting in vALIC deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27:5206-5212. [PMID: 36071109 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01760-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) is effective for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Retrospective evaluation showed that stimulation closer to the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (slMFB), within the vALIC, was associated with better response to DBS. The present study is the first to compare outcomes of DBS targeted at the vALIC using anatomical landmarks and DBS with connectomic tractography-based targeting of the slMFB. We included 20 OCD-patients with anatomical landmark-based DBS of the vALIC that were propensity score matched to 20 patients with tractography-based targeting of electrodes in the slMFB. After one year, we compared severity of OCD, anxiety and depression symptoms, response rates, time to response, number of parameter adjustments, average current, medication usage and stimulation-related adverse effects. There was no difference in Y-BOCS decrease between patients with anatomical landmark-based and tractography-based DBS. Nine (45%) patients with anatomical landmark-based DBS and 13 (65%) patients with tractography-based DBS were responders (BF10 = 1.24). The course of depression and anxiety symptoms, time to response, number of stimulation adjustments or medication usage did not differ between groups. Patients with tractography-based DBS experienced fewer stimulation-related adverse effects than patients with anatomical landmark-based DBS (38 vs 58 transient and 1 vs. 17 lasting adverse effects; BF10 = 14.968). OCD symptoms in patients with anatomical landmark-based DBS of the vALIC and tractography-based DBS of the slMFB decrease equally, but patients with tractography-based DBS experience less adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse Graat
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Roel J T Mocking
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luka C Liebrand
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van den Munckhof
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Bot
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Rick Schuurman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isidoor O Bergfeld
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido van Wingen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Camacho‐Conde JA, del Rosario Gonzalez‐Bermudez M, Carretero‐Rey M, Khan ZU. Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther 2022; 29:8-23. [PMID: 36229994 PMCID: PMC9804057 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment for brain diseases has been disappointing because available medications have failed to produce clinical response across all the patients. Many patients either do not respond or show partial and inconsistent effect, and even in patients who respond to the medications have high relapse rates. Brain stimulation has been seen as an alternative and effective remedy. As a result, brain stimulation has become one of the most valuable therapeutic tools for combating against brain diseases. In last decade, studies with the application of brain stimulation techniques not only have grown exponentially but also have expanded to wide range of brain disorders. Brain stimulation involves passing electric currents into the cortical and subcortical area brain cells with the use of noninvasive as well as invasive methods to amend brain functions. Over time, technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices; however, at present, most used noninvasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of noninvasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques focusing on the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Antonio Camacho‐Conde
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, CIMESUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain,Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain
| | | | - Marta Carretero‐Rey
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, CIMESUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain,Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain
| | - Zafar U. Khan
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, CIMESUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain,Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/nMalagaSpain,CIBERNEDInstitute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gadot R, Najera R, Hirani S, Anand A, Storch E, Goodman WK, Shofty B, Sheth SA. Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:jnnp-2021-328738. [PMID: 36127157 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and growing intervention for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (TROCD). We assessed current evidence on the efficacy of DBS in alleviating OCD and comorbid depressive symptoms including newly available evidence from recent trials and a deeper risk of bias analysis than previously available. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically queried using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included studies reporting primary data on multiple patients who received DBS therapy with outcomes reported through the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Primary effect measures included Y-BOCS mean difference and per cent reduction as well as responder rate (≥35% Y-BOCS reduction) at last follow-up. Secondary effect measures included standardised depression scale reduction. Risk of bias assessments were performed on randomised controlled (RCTs) and non-randomised trials. Thirty-four studies from 2005 to 2021, 9 RCTs (n=97) and 25 non-RCTs (n=255), were included in systematic review and meta-analysis based on available outcome data. A random-effects model indicated a meta-analytical average 14.3 point or 47% reduction (p<0.01) in Y-BOCS scores without significant difference between RCTs and non-RCTs. At last follow-up, 66% of patients were full responders to DBS therapy. Sensitivity analyses indicated a low likelihood of small study effect bias in reported outcomes. Secondary analysis revealed a 1 standardised effect size (Hedges' g) reduction in depressive scale symptoms. Both RCTs and non-RCTs were determined to have a predominantly low risk of bias. A strong evidence base supports DBS for TROCD in relieving both OCD and comorbid depression symptoms in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gadot
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ricardo Najera
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samad Hirani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adrish Anand
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eric Storch
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ben Shofty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kammen A, Cavaleri J, Lam J, Frank AC, Mason X, Choi W, Penn M, Brasfield K, Van Noppen B, Murray SB, Lee DJ. Neuromodulation of OCD: A review of invasive and non-invasive methods. Front Neurol 2022; 13:909264. [PMID: 36016538 PMCID: PMC9397524 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.909264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Early research into neural correlates of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has focused on individual components, several network-based models have emerged from more recent data on dysfunction within brain networks, including the the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC)-ventromedial caudate, limbic, salience, and default mode networks. Moreover, the interplay between multiple brain networks has been increasingly recognized. As the understanding of the neural circuitry underlying the pathophysiology of OCD continues to evolve, so will too our ability to specifically target these networks using invasive and noninvasive methods. This review discusses the rationale for and theory behind neuromodulation in the treatment of OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Kammen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jonathon Cavaleri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jordan Lam
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Adam C. Frank
- Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Xenos Mason
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wooseong Choi
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Marisa Penn
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Kaevon Brasfield
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Barbara Van Noppen
- Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Stuart B. Murray
- Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Darrin Jason Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mahoney JJ, Koch-Gallup N, Scarisbrick DM, Berry JH, Rezai AR. Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders and behavioral/cognitive-related indications: Review of the literature and implications for treatment. J Neurol Sci 2022; 437:120253. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
16
|
Müller S, van Oosterhout A, Bervoets C, Christen M, Martínez-Álvarez R, Bittlinger M. Concerns About Psychiatric Neurosurgery and How They Can Be Overcome: Recommendations for Responsible Research. NEUROETHICS-NETH 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09485-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Psychiatric neurosurgery is experiencing a revival. Beside deep brain stimulation (DBS), several ablative neurosurgical procedures are currently in use. Each approach has a different profile of advantages and disadvantages. However, many psychiatrists, ethicists, and laypeople are sceptical about psychiatric neurosurgery.
Methods
We identify the main concerns against psychiatric neurosurgery, and discuss the extent to which they are justified and how they might be overcome. We review the evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy and safety of each approach, and discuss how this could be improved. We analyse whether and, if so, how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can be used in the different approaches, and what alternatives are available if conducting RCTs is impossible for practical or ethical reasons. Specifically, we analyse the problem of failed RCTs after promising open-label studies.
Results
The main concerns are: (i) reservations based on historical psychosurgery, (ii) concerns about personality changes, (iii) concerns regarding localised interventions, and (iv) scepticism due to the lack of scientific evidence. Given the need for effective therapies for treatment-refractory psychiatric disorders and preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of psychiatric neurosurgery, further research is warranted and necessary. Since psychiatric neurosurgery has the potential to modify personality traits, it should be held to the highest ethical and scientific standards.
Conclusions
Psychiatric neurosurgery procedures with preliminary evidence for efficacy and an acceptable risk–benefit profile include DBS and micro- or radiosurgical anterior capsulotomy for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder. These methods may be considered for individual treatment attempts, but multi-centre RCTs are necessary to provide reliable evidence.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mocking RJT, Graat I, Denys D. Why Has Deep Brain Stimulation Had So Little Impact in Psychiatry? Front Neurol 2022; 12:757142. [PMID: 34970208 PMCID: PMC8712949 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.757142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Over two decades ago, the first scientific publication on deep brain stimulation (DBS) in psychiatry was published. The evidence for effectiveness of DBS for several psychiatric disorders has been steadily accumulating since the first report of DBS for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in 1999. However, the number of psychiatric patients treated with DBS is lagging behind, particularly in comparison with neurology. The number of patients treated with DBS for psychiatric indications worldwide probably does not exceed 500, compared to almost 300,000 patients with neurological disorders that have been treated with DBS within the same period of 20 years. It is not the lack of patients, knowledge, technology, or efficacy of DBS that hinders its development and application in psychiatry. Here, we discuss the reasons for the gap between DBS in neurology and in psychiatry, which seemed to involve the scientific and social signature of psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel J T Mocking
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ilse Graat
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bouwens van der Vlis TA, Samanci Y, Ackermans L, Schruers KR, Temel Y, Leentjens AF, Dincer A, Peker S. Network analysis in Gamma Knife capsulotomy for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder. BRAIN AND SPINE 2022; 2:100892. [PMID: 36248148 PMCID: PMC9562250 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A.M. Bouwens van der Vlis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht (MUMC+) PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen R.J. Schruers
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Y. Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Albert F.G. Leentjens
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Alp Dincer
- Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hu XZ. Left Amygdala Functional Connectivity Decreased after Fear of Negative Events was Disregarded in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Neurosci Insights 2022; 17:26331055221114823. [PMID: 36081984 PMCID: PMC9445531 DOI: 10.1177/26331055221114823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and debilitating mental disorder that affects patients throughout their lives, leading to a diminished quality of life for patients and families, reduced productivity, and higher health care costs. It is of clinical and theoretical importance to investigate a more efficacious therapeutic approach for OCD and the neurophysiological mechanism underlying the efficacy of treatment, potentially associated with the etiology of OCD. Recently, a novel psychotherapy designated cognitive-coping therapy (CCT) has been reported to have a large effect size in OCD treatment. CCT hypothesizes that fear of negative events plays a crucial role in OCD. The study entitled “Decreased left amygdala functional connectivity by cognitive-coping therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder” attempted to investigate the potential neurophysiological mechanism underlying the efficacy of CCT for OCD. The study provides crystal evidence showing that 4-week pharmacotherapy plus CCT decreases the left amygdala seed-based functional connectivity (LA-FC) with the right anterior cingulate gyrus and the left paracentral lobule/the left superior parietal/left inferior parietal, and 4-week CCT decreases the LA-FC with the left middle occipital gyrus/the left superior parietal. The alteration of the LA-FC with the right anterior cingulate gyrus positively correlates to the reduction of the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) score. Therefore, it provides new insights into understanding the neurophysiology and neuropsychology behind the onset and treatment of OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian-Zhang Hu
- Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mar-Barrutia L, Real E, Segalás C, Bertolín S, Menchón JM, Alonso P. Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review of worldwide experience after 20 years. World J Psychiatry 2021; 11:659-680. [PMID: 34631467 PMCID: PMC8474989 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twenty years after its first use in a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the results confirm that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for patients with severe and resistant forms of the disorder. Nevertheless, many unknowns remain, including the optimal anatomical targets, the best stimulation parameters, the long-term (LT) effects of the therapy, and the clinical or biological factors associated with response. This systematic review of the articles published to date on DBS for OCD assesses the short and LT efficacy of the therapy and seeks to identify predictors of response.
AIM To summarize the existing knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD.
METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 31, 2020, using the following strategy: “(Obsessive-compulsive disorder OR OCD) AND (deep brain stimulation OR DBS).” Clinical trials and observational studies published in English and evaluating the effectiveness of DBS for OCD in humans were included and screened for relevant information using a standardized collection tool. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a main diagnosis of OCD, DBS conducted for therapeutic purposes and variation in symptoms of OCD measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) as primary outcome. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS Forty articles identified by the search strategy met the eligibility criteria. Applying a follow-up threshold of 36 mo, 29 studies (with 230 patients) provided information on short-term (ST) response to DBS in, while 11 (with 155 patients) reported results on LT response. Mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 8.0 mo for the ST studies and 63.7 ± 20.7 mo for the LT studies. Overall, the percentage of reduction in Y-BOCS scores was similar in ST (47.4%) and LT responses (47.2%) to DBS, but more patients in the LT reports met the criteria for response (defined as a reduction in Y-BOCS scores > 35%: ST, 60.6% vs LT, 70.7%). According to the results, the response in the first year predicts the extent to which an OCD patient will benefit from DBS, since the maximum symptom reduction was achieved in most responders in the first 12-14 mo after implantation. Reports indicate a consistent tendency for this early improvement to be maintained to the mid-term for most patients; but it is still controversial whether this improvement persists, increases or decreases in the long term. Three different patterns of LT response emerged from the analysis: 49.5% of patients had good and sustained response to DBS, 26.6% were non responders, and 22.5% were partial responders, who might improve at some point but experience relapses during follow-up. A significant improvement in depressive symptoms and global functionality was observed in most studies, usually (although not always) in parallel with an improvement in obsessive symptoms. Most adverse effects of DBS were mild and transient and improved after adjusting stimulation parameters; however, some severe adverse events including intracranial hemorrhages and infections were also described. Hypomania was the most frequently reported psychiatric side effect. The relationship between DBS and suicide risk is still controversial and requires further study. Finally, to date, no clear clinical or biological predictors of response can be established, probably because of the differences between studies in terms of the neuroanatomical targets and stimulation protocols assessed.
CONCLUSION The present review confirms that DBS is a promising therapy for patients with severe resistant OCD, providing both ST and LT evidence of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Mar-Barrutia
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
| | - Eva Real
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Cinto Segalás
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Sara Bertolín
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
| | - José Manuel Menchón
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08907, Spain
| | - Pino Alonso
- OCD Clinical and Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, Barcelona 08907, Spain
- CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08907, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bragdon LB, Eng GK, Belanger A, Collins KA, Stern ER. Interoception and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:686482. [PMID: 34512412 PMCID: PMC8424053 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.686482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Disrupted interoceptive processes are present in a range of psychiatric conditions, and there is a small but growing body of research on the role of interoception in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In this review, we outline dimensions of interoception and review current literature on the processing of internal bodily sensations within OCD. Investigations in OCD utilizing objective measures of interoception are limited and results mixed, however, the subjective experience of internal bodily sensations appears to be atypical and relate to specific patterns of symptom dimensions. Further, neuroimaging investigations suggest that interoception is related to core features of OCD, particularly sensory phenomena and disgust. Interoception is discussed in the context of treatment by presenting an overview of existing interventions and suggesting how modifications aimed at better targeting interoceptive processes could serve to optimize outcomes. Interoception represents a promising direction for multi-method research in OCD, which we expect, will prove useful for improving current interventions and identifying new treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura B. Bragdon
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| | - Goi Khia Eng
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| | - Amanda Belanger
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| | - Katherine A. Collins
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Emily R. Stern
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pittenger C, Brennan BP, Koran L, Mathews CA, Nestadt G, Pato M, Phillips KA, Rodriguez CI, Simpson HB, Skapinakis P, Stein DJ, Storch EA. Specialty knowledge and competency standards for pharmacotherapy for adult obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2021; 300:113853. [PMID: 33975093 PMCID: PMC8536398 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects approximately one person in 40 and causes substantial suffering. Evidence-based treatments can benefit many; however, optimal treatment can be difficult to access. Diagnosis is frequently delayed, and pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions often fail to follow evidence-based guidelines. To ameliorate this distressing situation, the International OCD Accreditation Task Force of the Canadian Institute for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders has developed knowledge and competency standards for specialized treatments for OCD through the lifespan. These are foundational to evidence-based practice and will form the basis for upcoming ATF development of certification/accreditation programs. Here, we present specialty standards for the pharmacological treatment of adult OCD. We emphasize the importance of integrating pharmacotherapy with clear diagnosis, appreciation of complicating factors, and evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Clear evidence exists to inform first- and second-line pharmacological treatments. In disease refractory to these initial efforts, multiple strategies have been investigated, but the evidence is more equivocal. These standards summarize this limited evidence to give the specialist practitioner a solid basis on which to make difficult decisions in complex cases. It is hoped that further research will lead to development of a clear, multi-step treatment algorithm to support each step in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Pittenger
- Department of Psychiatry and Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
| | - Brian P Brennan
- Biological Psychiatry Laboratory and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Institute, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lorrin Koran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Carol A Mathews
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Gerald Nestadt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Michele Pato
- Institute for Genomic Health and Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Katharine A Phillips
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, and Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Carolyn I Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - H Blair Simpson
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States; Office of Mental Health, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States
| | - Petros Skapinakis
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dan J Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eric A Storch
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|