Effectiveness of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy-Evidence from modifications due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Clinical Outcomes of Continuation and Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy

Importance

Large-scale evidence for the efficacy of continuation and maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (c/mECT) is lacking.

Objective

To provide an exhaustive and naturalistic insight into the real-world outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of c/mECT in a large dataset.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included all patients in the Danish National Patient Registry who initiated treatment with ECT from 2003 through 2022. The data were analyzed from October 2023 to February 2024.

Exposures

ECT. An algorithm to identify c/mECTs in the dataset was developed: (>3 treatments with ≥7 and <90 days between adjacent treatments, occurring within a time frame of 180 days [cECT] or more [mECT] after an acute [aECT] series).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The association of c/mECT with subsequent 6- to 12-month risk of hospitalization or suicidal behavior using Cox proportional hazard regression with multiple adjustments and aECT only as a reference, propensity score matching, and self-controlled case series analysis using a Poisson regression model. A cost-effectiveness analysis based on hospitalization and ECT expenses was made.

Results

A total of 19 944 individuals were treated with ECT (12 157 women [61%], 7787 men [39%]; median [IQR] age, 55 [41-70] years). Of these, 1533 individuals (7.7%) received c/mECT at any time point (1017 [5.1%] cECT only and 516 [2.6%] mECT). Compared with patients receiving aECT only, c/mECT patients more frequently experienced schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% CI, 1.86-2.46) and schizoaffective disorder (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.90-3.09) and less frequently unipolar depression (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.62). In all models, c/mECT was associated with a lower rate of hospitalization after finishing aECT (eg, 6-month adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78 [Cox regression]; 6-month incidence rate ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.62 [Poisson regression]). There was no significant difference in the risk of suicidal behavior. Compared with the periods before the end of aECT, c/mECT was associated with a substantial reduction in total treatment costs.

Conclusions and Relevance

In a nationwide and naturalistic setting, c/mECT after aECT was infrequently used but associated with a lower risk of readmission than aECT alone. The totality of the evidence indicates that c/mECT should be considered more often to prevent relapse after successful aECT in patients whose condition does not respond sufficiently to other interventions.

Effects of lockdowns on neurobiological and psychometric parameters in unipolar depression during the COVID-19 pandemic

Defying the COVID-19 pandemic required restriction measures of unprecedented scale, that may induce and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms across the population. We aimed to assess in vivo dynamic effects of mitigation strategies on human brain neurobiology, neuroplastic as well as psychometric parameters. Three structural magnetic resonance imaging measurements, serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) analyses, and psychometric assessments (Beck Depression Inventory-II and Perceived Stress Questionnaire-20) were performed in healthy individuals and patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder in the period from September 2020 to July 2021. Group differences and changes over time in structural imaging, neuroplastic and psychometric parameters were assessed with linear mixed models. Analysis of data from 18 patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder and 28 healthy individuals showed clinically relevant scores for depression and stress in the patient group as well as significant cross-sectional differences in depression scores (F = 30.89, p < 0.001) and three subscales of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (Worries: F = 19.19, p < 0.001, Tension: F = 34.44, p < 0.001, Joy: F = 12.05, p = 0.001). Linear mixed models revealed no significant changes over time in cortical thickness of the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala (F = 0.29, p > 0.1) and no interaction with group (F = 0.28, p > 0.1). Further, analysis revealed no main effect of time and no interaction of time x group in depressive symptoms, perceived stress subscales, and sBDNF (all p > 0.1). Despite the limited sample size, the strength of this investigation lies in the multimodal assessment of peri-pandemic lockdown effects. Nine months of varying restrictions measures did not result in observable changes in brain morphology nor impact depressive symptoms in either psychiatric patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder or healthy individuals. While these neurobiological and psychometric data stand in contrast to initial expectations about the effects of restriction measures, they might inform future investigations of longitudinal effects of restriction measures on mental health.

Impact on Electroconvulsive Therapy Services, Including Patient Relapse and Death, During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Results From a Multinational Survey

OBJECTIVES

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is important in the management of major, life-threatening, and treatment-resistant psychiatric illness. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted ECT services. The need for new infection control measures, staff redeployment and shortages, and the perception that ECT is as an "elective" procedure have caused changes to, and reductions in, ECT delivery. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on ECT services, staff, and patients globally.

METHODS

Data were collected using an electronic, mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey. The survey was open from March to November 2021. Clinical directors in ECT services, their delegates, and anesthetists were asked to participate. Quantitative findings are reported.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve participants worldwide completed the survey. The study identified significant impacts on services, staff, and patients. Importantly, most participants (57.8%; n = 63) reported their services made at least 1 change to ECT delivery. More than three-quarters (81.0%; n = 73) reported that their service had identified at least 1 patient who could not access ECT. More than two-thirds (71.4%; n = 67) reported that their service identified patients who experienced a relapse in their psychiatric illness due to lack of ECT access. Six participants (7.6%) reported that their service had identified at least 1 patient who died, by suicide or other means, due to lack of ECT access.

CONCLUSIONS

All ECT practices surveyed were impacted by COVID-19 with decreases in capacity, staffing, changes in workflow, and personal protective equipment requirements with relatively little change to ECT technique. Lack of access to ECT resulted in significant morbidity and mortality, including suicide, internationally. This is the first multisite, international survey to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on ECT services, staff, and patients.

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Continuation and Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Observational Studies

ABSTRACT

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment for severe and treatment-resistant depression, but relapse rates remain high despite maintenance pharmacotherapy. Continuation or maintenance ECT (C/M-ECT) offers the potential to prevent relapses in the most unwell patients, but there remains disagreement among guidelines regarding its efficacy and tolerability. This review aims to summarize and assess the current evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of continuation and maintenance ECT for depression, including data from randomized and observational studies, which included an appropriate control group. Twenty studies were found meeting inclusion criteria. There was evidence from 14 studies suggesting that relapse rates are reduced in those receiving C/M-ECT. There was evidence from 6 studies suggesting that C/M-ECT had no effect on global cognitive function. Detailed neuropsychological testing was limited, but within studies that assessed specific cognitive domains, there was not consistent evidence for deficits in C/M-ECT compared with the control group. The certainty of evidence across outcomes was low or very low because of inclusion of observational studies, heterogeneity of study design, and patient populations. The findings add further weight to evidence suggesting that C/M-ECT is a viable treatment option to prevent relapse in severe depression and provides clinicians with further evidence for the benefits and risks of C/M-ECT when discussing treatment options with patients. Future research should focus on randomized or well-designed prospective studies with sufficient follow-up to determine longer-term outcomes, while including a standardized, detailed neurocognitive battery to assess potential adverse effects.

Changes in Inpatient Electroconvulsive Therapy Utilization Between 2019 and 2020: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an essential procedure for a range of psychiatric conditions. Multiple single-center studies have documented reduction in ECT administration in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, but there have been little nationally representative data from the United States. The aim of this study was to examine the demographics of patients receiving ECT in 2019 and 2020 and to characterize temporal and regional variations in ECT utilization.

METHODS

The 2019 and 2020 National Inpatient Sample, an administrative database of inpatient hospitalizations in the United States, was queried for hospitalizations involving the delivery of ECT based on procedural codes. Overall number of ECT procedures was calculated based on the overall number of ECT procedural claims.

RESULTS

In the 2019 NIS, 14,230 inpatient hospitalizations (95% confidence interval, 12,936-15,524) involved the use of ECT, with a cumulative 52,450 inpatient ECT procedures administered. In 2020, the number of inpatient hospitalizations with ECT decreased to 12,055 (95% confidence interval, 10,878-13,232), with a 10.0% reduction in overall procedures to 47,180. Whereas January and February ECT hospitalizations were comparable in both years, ECT hospitalizations decreased by more than 25% in March through May 2020 relative to 2019 volume. There was regional variability in the change in ECT utilization between 2019 and 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroconvulsive therapy use among general hospital inpatients declined between 2019 and 2020, with regional variability in the magnitude of change. Further study is warranted into the root causes and optimal responses to these changes.

[Electroconvulsive Therapy in the New National Guideline Depression: Effectiveness, Evidence, and Grade of Recommendation]

In comparison to the previous version, the new national guideline 'Unipolar Depression' comprises more differentiated statements and recommendations regarding the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). In principle, this is most welcome, as it clarifies the particular significance of ECT in different clinical situations. In parallel, this differentiation of recommendations depending on the presence of specific features of depressive disorders (e. g., psychotic symptoms, suicidality) led to different grades of recommendations for ECT. This may be correct and rational under the strict methodology of a guideline process, but nevertheless may appear confusing and contradictory in clinical practice. This article describes the relationships and putative discrepancies between the effectiveness of ECT, scientific evidence, and grading of guideline recommendations with comments on these for clinical practice from experts' point of view.

[Health service aspects of electroconvulsive therapy: analysis of external referrals to a university medical center]

BACKGROUND

The application of ECT in Germany varies widely depending on regional availability. This shortfall in ECT supply is partly compensated via referrals to hospitals with ECT services, yet restricted by limited resources in these clinics.

OBJECTIVE

External referrals for ECT were investigated at the University Medical Center Göttingen. We analyzed the referring institutions, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy according to current guidelines before indications for ECT, and clinical outcome in cases of treatment with ECT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All external referrals were systematically recorded and retrospectively evaluated for the time span of 1 year. Besides descriptive presentation of the data, pharmacological pretreatment was compared with the current guideline recommendations. We used overall clinical impression (CGI-I) to determine the treatment response post-ECT.

RESULTS

External referrals were made for N = 52 patients, 82.7% of whom were from the inpatient setting and from a distance of up to 300 km. The most common diagnoses were unipolar depression (57.7%), followed by schizophrenia spectrum (36.5%). Prior to referral, at least one guideline-based pretreatment was given in the majority of cases. ECT was performed in 18 patients in our hospital, of whom 72.7% showed a good to very good response.

CONCLUSION

Both numbers and radius of external referrals indicate a high unmet need for ECT and thus limited access to this evidence-based and guideline-recommended therapy. As treatment close to home should be the goal, more hospitals are needed to establish (or expand) ECT services; however, even with considerable delays which are often associated with external referrals, the response rate is good across all diagnoses.

Strategies from A Multi-National Sample of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Services: Managing Anesthesia for ECT during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is important in the management of severe, treatment-resistant, and life-threatening psychiatric illness. Anesthesia supports the clinical efficacy and tolerability of ECT. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted ECT services, including anesthesia. This study documents strategies for managing ECT anesthesia during the pandemic. Data were collected between March and November 2021, using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, electronic survey. Clinical directors in ECT services, their delegates, and anesthetists worldwide participated. One hundred and twelve participants provided quantitative responses to the survey. Of these, 23.4% were anesthetists, and the remainder were ECT clinical directors. Most participants were from Australia, New Zealand, North America, and Europe. Most were located in a public hospital, in a metropolitan region, and in a ‘medium/high-risk’ COVID-19 hotspot. Half of the participants reported their services made changes to ECT anesthetic technique during the pandemic. Services introduced strategies associated with anesthetic induction, ventilation, use of laryngeal mask airways, staffing, medications, plastic barriers to separate staff from patients, and the location of extubation and recovery. This is the first multi-national, mixed-methods study to investigate ECT anesthesia practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results are vital to inform practice during the next waves of COVID-19 infection, ensuring patients continue to receive ECT.

Efficacy and Safety of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Deep Brain Stimulation: Literature Review, Case Report for Patient With Essential Tremor, and Practical Recommendations

AIM

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has proven to be an effective therapy of some treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders and movement disorders. Comorbid depressive symptoms are common and difficult to manage. Treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may be required. There are few published cases describing the safety and efficacy of ECT for patients with DBS implants, and there are no available guidelines for administration of ECT in patients with DBS and mood disorders. The current study had 3 aims: (i) to conduct a systematic review of case reports on patients with DBS implants who received ECT; (ii) to report the case of a 69-year-old man with a DBS implant for essential tremor, who required ECT; and (iii) to provide practical recommendations for ECT in patients with DBS implants.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, of existing case reports on patients with DBS implants administered ECT for psychiatric disorders.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 25 cases of ECT in patients implanted with DBS systems. In addition, we here describe successful ECT management of major depressive disorder in a patient treated by DBS. We also set forth ECT management guidelines based on points of consensus. The 2 most important practical recommendations are to make sure the DBS system is set to 0 V and turned off before ECT, and to avoid sites near the DBS electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroconvulsive therapy may be an effective and safe treatment for DBS patients with MDD.

Provision of Electroconvulsive Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Among Clinics in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a marked impact on psychiatry. Capacity reductions also affected electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), even though ECT is an essential rather than an elective procedure. We sent a survey to all 197 clinics in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland with an ECT service between March and May 2021 to provide an overview of the changes made to ECT services in these countries during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than a quarter of the clinics (27.0%) reported a temporary suspension of all ECT treatments, and 28.2% of the clinics reported reductions of up to 75%. Maintenance ECT was suspended in 46.7% of the clinics and reduced by up to 75% in 30.6% of the clinics. At the time of the survey, 40.8% of the clinics still reported lower numbers of ECT treatments compared with the prepandemic situation. Reasons for the reduced number of ECT treatments included patient safety and testing measures, personnel shortages in the anesthesiology departments, and limited availability of rooms. The COVID-19 pandemic had and continues to have a marked negative impact on the provision of ECT in clinics in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. To avoid negative consequences for patients, ECT clinics should urgently take steps to provide ECT services without disruptions.

An Online Survey About Electroconvulsive Therapy in Japan During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Early and Recent Stages

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of how electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice in Japan has changed as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We surveyed healthcare institutions, primarily university and general hospitals, regarding changes in the number of patients undergoing ECT and infection control measures in the early (August 2020) and recent (August 2021) stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data for the early and recent stages were also compared between urban and non-urban areas.

RESULTS

Among 32 facilities, the number of patients undergoing ECT decreased in 11 facilities (34.4%) from April 2020 to March 2021 compared with the previous year, whereas the number increased in 12 (37.5%) from April to June 2021 compared with the previous year. As of August 2021, some facilities had ongoing restrictions. Compared with non-urban facilities, the number of patients undergoing ECT decreased more in urban facilities, which also had more ECT restrictions. Maintenance ECT was used at the same rate as before the pandemic for 23 (82.1%) of 28 institutions. Regarding infection control measures, many facilities considered polymerase chain reaction testing before ECT and required all staff to wear surgical masks and eye shields during ECT.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic in Japan greatly affected the use of ECT in 2020; however, by the summer of 2021, infection control measures were relatively well established, the number of ECT cases stabilized and increased, and the decision to use ECT was again possible.

Medium-term and peri-lockdown course of psychosocial burden during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study on patients with pre-existing mental disorders

While the COVID-19 pandemic continues, patients with pre-existing mental disorders are increasingly recognized as a risk group for adverse outcomes. However, data are conflicting and cover only short time spans so far. Here, we investigate the medium-term and peri-lockdown-related changes of mental health outcomes in such patients in a longitudinal study. A cohort of 159 patients comprising all major mental disorders (ICD-10 F0-F9) were interviewed twice with the Goettingen psychosocial Burden and Symptom Inventory (Goe-BSI) to evaluate psychosocial burden, psychiatric symptoms and resilience at the end of the first (April/May 2020) and the second lockdown in Germany (November/December 2020). For the primary outcome "psychosocial burden" ratings also comprised retrospective pre-pandemic (early 2020) and very early states during the pandemic (March 2020). For all diagnostic groups, psychosocial burden varied significantly over time (p < 0.001) with an increase from the pre-pandemic to the initial phase (p < 0.001), followed by a steady decrease across both lockdowns, normalizing in November/December 2020. Female gender, high adjustment disorder symptom load at baseline and psychiatric comorbidities were risk factors for higher levels and an unfavorable course of psychosocial burden. Most psychiatric symptoms changed minimally, while resilience decreased over time (p = 0.044 and p = 0.037). The longitudinal course of psychosocial burden indicates an initial stress response, followed by a return to pre-pandemic levels even under recurrent lockdown conditions, mimicking symptoms of an adjustment disorder. Strategies for proactive, specific and continuous treatment have to address resilience capacities before their depletion in the pandemic aftermath, especially for patients with additional risk factors.