1
|
Homayra F, Enns B, Min JE, Kurz M, Bach P, Bruneau J, Greenland S, Gustafson P, Karim ME, Korthuis PT, Loughin T, MacLure M, McCandless L, Platt RW, Schnepel K, Shigeoka H, Siebert U, Socias E, Wood E, Nosyk B. Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Epidemiology 2024; 35:218-231. [PMID: 38290142 PMCID: PMC10833049 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instrumental variable (IV) analysis provides an alternative set of identification assumptions in the presence of uncontrolled confounding when attempting to estimate causal effects. Our objective was to evaluate the suitability of measures of prescriber preference and calendar time as potential IVs to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS Using linked population-level health administrative data, we constructed five IVs: prescribing preference at the individual, facility, and region levels (continuous and categorical variables), calendar time, and a binary prescriber's preference IV in analyzing the treatment assignment-treatment discontinuation association using both incident-user and prevalent-new-user designs. Using published guidelines, we assessed and compared each IV according to the four assumptions for IVs, employing both empirical assessment and content expertise. We evaluated the robustness of results using sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The study sample included 35,904 incident users (43.3% on buprenorphine/naloxone) initiated on opioid agonist treatment by 1585 prescribers during the study period. While all candidate IVs were strong (A1) according to conventional criteria, by expert opinion, we found no evidence against assumptions of exclusion (A2), independence (A3), monotonicity (A4a), and homogeneity (A4b) for prescribing preference-based IV. Some criteria were violated for the calendar time-based IV. We determined that preference in provider-level prescribing, measured on a continuous scale, was the most suitable IV for comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone for the treatment of OUD. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that prescriber's preference measures are suitable IVs in comparative effectiveness studies of treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahmida Homayra
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benjamin Enns
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeong Eun Min
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Megan Kurz
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paxton Bach
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Julie Bruneau
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sander Greenland
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul Gustafson
- Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Addiction Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Thomas Loughin
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malcolm MacLure
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lawrence McCandless
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert William Platt
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kevin Schnepel
- Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hitoshi Shigeoka
- Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research, and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Program on Cardiovascular Research, Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Eugenia Socias
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan Wood
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bohdan Nosyk
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bardwell G, Bowles JM, Mansoor M, Werb D, Kerr T. Access to tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy in rural and smaller urban settings in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:14. [PMID: 36869358 PMCID: PMC9984129 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural and smaller urban settings in Canada are disproportionately impacted by the overdose crisis, highlighting the need for novel public health interventions within these jurisdictions. Tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT) programs have been implemented in select rural communities as a means to address drug-related harms. However, little is known about the accessibility of these novel programs. Therefore, we conducted this study to understand the rural context and factors that affected access of TiOAT programs. METHODS Between October 2021 to April 2022, individual qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 individuals enrolled in a TiOAT program at participating rural and smaller urban sites in British Columbia, Canada. Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo 12 and data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS TiOAT access varied considerably. TiOAT delivery in rural settings is complicated due to geographic challenges. Participants who were homeless and staying at a nearby shelter or those in centrally-located supportive housing had minimal issues compared to those living in more affordable housing on the outskirts of town with limited transportation options. Dispensing policies that required daily-witnessed ingestion multiple times daily were challenging for most. Only one site provided evening take-home doses whereas participants at the other site could only resort to the illicit opioid supply to address withdrawal outside of program hours. Participants described the clinics as providing a positive and familial social environment compared to experiences of stigma elsewhere. Medication interruptions did occur when participants were in hospital and custodial settings, leading to withdrawal, program discontinuation, and overdose risk. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the beneficial ways in which health services tailored for people who use drugs can create a stigma-free environment with an emphasis on social bonds. Other factors such as transportation access, dispensing policies, and access in rural hospitals and custodial settings produced unique challenges for rural people who use drugs. Public health authorities in rural and smaller settings should consider these factors when designing, implementing, and scaling up future substance use services, including TiOAT programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoff Bardwell
- School of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
| | - Jeanette M Bowles
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Manal Mansoor
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Dan Werb
- Centre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1T8, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases & Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92023, USA
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, , Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palis H, Zhao B, Young P, Korchinski M, Greiner L, Nicholls T, Slaunwhite A. Stimulant use disorder diagnosis and opioid agonist treatment dispensation following release from prison: a cohort study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:77. [PMID: 36434706 PMCID: PMC9694574 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00504-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent opioid and stimulant use is on the rise in North America. This increasing trend of use has been observed in the general population, and among people released from prison in British Columbia (BC), who face an elevated risk of overdose post-release. Opioid agonist treatment is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder and reduces risk of overdose mortality. In the context of rising concurrent stimulant use among people with opioid use disorder, this study aims to investigate the impact of stimulant use disorder on opioid agonist treatment dispensation following release from prison in BC. METHODS Linked health and corrections records were retrieved for releases between January 1st 2015 and December 29th 2018 (N = 13,380). Hospital and primary-care administrative health records were used to identify opioid and stimulant use disorder and mental illness. Age, sex, and health region were derived from BC's Client Roster. Incarceration data were retrieved from provincial prison records. Opioid agonist treatment data was retrieved from BC's provincial drug dispensation database. A generalized estimating equation produced estimates for the relationship of stimulant use disorder and opioid agonist treatment dispensation within two days post-release. RESULTS Cases of release among people with an opioid use disorder were identified (N = 13,380). Approximately 25% (N = 3,328) of releases ended in opioid agonist treatment dispensation within two days post-release. A statistically significant interaction of stimulant use disorder and mental illness was identified. Stratified odds ratios (ORs) found that in the presence of mental illness, stimulant use disorder was associated with lower odds of obtaining OAT [(OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-0.84)] while in the absence of mental illness, this relationship did not hold [OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.70-1.13]. CONCLUSIONS People with mental illness and stimulant use disorder diagnoses have a lower odds of being dispensed agonist treatment post-release compared to people with mental illness alone. There is a critical need to scale up and adapt opioid agonist treatment and ancillary harm reduction, and treatment services to reach people released from prison who have concurrent stimulant use disorder and mental illness diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Palis
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830BC Centre for Disease Control, University of British Columbia, 655 W 12Th Avenue, BC V5Z 4R4 Vancouver, Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada
| | - Bin Zhao
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830BC Centre for Disease Control, University of British Columbia, 655 W 12Th Avenue, BC V5Z 4R4 Vancouver, Canada
| | - Pam Young
- Unlocking the Gates Services Society, 22838 Lougheed Hwy. Unit 104, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 2V6 Canada
| | - Mo Korchinski
- Unlocking the Gates Services Society, 22838 Lougheed Hwy. Unit 104, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 2V6 Canada
| | - Leigh Greiner
- BC Corrections, 1001 Douglas St, Victoria, BC V8W 2C5 Canada
| | - Tonia Nicholls
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada ,grid.498716.50000 0000 8794 2105BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services, 4949 Heather St, Vancouver, BC V5Z 3L7 Canada
| | - Amanda Slaunwhite
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830BC Centre for Disease Control, University of British Columbia, 655 W 12Th Avenue, BC V5Z 4R4 Vancouver, Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|