Health service utilisation and health outcomes of residential aged care residents referred to a hospital avoidance program: A multi-site retrospective quasi-experimental study

Hospitalisations before and after entry into a residential aged care facility: An interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hospitalisations are an important indicator of safety and quality of care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). This study aimed to investigate changes in hospital use 12 months before and 12 months after RACF entry using routinely collected data from 25 Australian RACFs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study using linked aged care provider and hospital record data. The sample comprised 1029 residents living in an aged care facility between July 2014 and December 2019 who had stayed a minimum of 12 months in an RACF. The outcome measures were all-cause hospitalisations and fall-related hospitalisations. We applied an interrupted time series analysis using segmented regression to examine changes in both outcome measures over time. Stratified analyses were conducted by gender and dementia status.

RESULTS

The rate of all-cause hospitalisations increased dramatically over the 12 months before RACF entry, from 97 per 1000 residents per month 12 months prior to RACF admission to 303 per 1000 residents at the second month prior to RACF entry. All-cause hospitalisations then decreased considerably to 55 per 1000 residents upon RACF admission and stabilised across the next 12 months. Such trajectories were also observed in fall-related hospitalisations and were consistent for gender and dementia status.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, hospitalisation rates decreased significantly after RACF entry, and such reductions were maintained for residents who stayed for 12 months in RACFs. Multiple hospital admissions are likely to precipitate entry into RACF. Additional investigation of how community-based services can be successful in reducing the escalating hospitalisations is needed.

Identifying the core components of a nursing home hospital avoidance programme

BACKGROUND

Nursing home hospital avoidance programmes have contributed to a reduction in unnecessary emergency transfers but a description of the core components of the programmes has not been forthcoming. A well-operationalised health-care programme requires clarity around core components to evaluate and replicate the programme. Core components are the essential functions and principles that must be implemented to produce expected outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the core components of a nursing home hospital avoidance programme by assessing how the core components identified at one nursing home (Site One) translated to a second nursing home (Site Two).

METHODS

Data collected during the programme's implementation at Site Two were reviewed for evidence of how the core components named at Site One were implemented at Site Two and to determine if any additional core components were evident. The preliminary updated core components were then shared with seven evaluators familiar with the hospital avoidance programme for consensus.

RESULTS

The updated core components were agreed to include the following: Decision Support Tools, Advanced Clinical Skills Training, Specialist Clinical Support and Collaboration, Facility Policy and Procedures, Family and Care Recipient Education and Engagement, Culture of Staff Readiness, Supportive Executive and Facility Management.

CONCLUSION

This study launches a discussion on the need to identify hospital avoidance programme core components, while providing valuable insight into how Site One core programme components, such as resources, education and training, clinical and facility support, translated to Site Two, and why modifications and additions, such as incorporating the programme into facility policy, family education and executive support were necessary, and the ramifications of those changes. The next step is to take the eight core component categories and undertake a rigorous fidelity assessment as part of formal process evaluation where the components can be critiqued and measured across multiple nursing home sites. The core components can then be used as evidence-based building blocks for developing, implementing and evaluating nursing home hospital avoidance programmes.

Factors impacting hospital avoidance program utilisation in the care of acutely unwell residential aged care facility residents

Background

An existing hospital avoidance program, the Aged Care Rapid Response Team (ARRT), rapidly delivers geriatric outreach services to acutely unwell or older people with declining health at risk of hospitalisation. The aim of the current study was to explore health professionals’ perspectives on the factors impacting ARRT utilisation in the care of acutely unwell residential aged care facility residents.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two Geriatricians, two ARRT Clinical Nurse Consultants, an ED-based Clinical Nurse Specialist, and an Extended Care Paramedic. Interview questions elicited views on key factors regarding care decisions and care transitions for acutely unwell residential aged care facility residents. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes and sub-themes from interviews.

Results

Analysis of interviews identified five overarching themes affecting ARRT utilisation in the care of acutely unwell residents: (1) resident care needs; (2) family factors; (3) enabling factors; (4) barriers; and (5) adaptability and responsiveness to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

Various factors impact on hospital avoidance program utilisation in the care of acutely unwell older aged care facility residents. This information provides additional context to existing quantitative evaluations of hospital avoidance programs, as well as informing the design of future hospital avoidance programs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06575-1.