1
|
Calvert A, Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Basude S, Coleman M, Cuthbertson H, England A, Greening V, Hallis B, Johnstone E, Jones CE, Karampatsas K, Khalil A, Le Doare K, Matheson M, Peregrine E, Snape MD, Vatish M, Heath PT. Optimising the timing of whooping cough immunisation in mums (OpTIMUM) through investigating pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: an open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2023; 4:e300-e308. [PMID: 37080224 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(22)00332-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is recommended in many countries to provide protection to young infants. The best timing for this vaccination is uncertain. In the UK, vaccination is recommended between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. In this trial we aimed to investigate the equivalence of three time periods for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS In this open-label, equivalence, randomised controlled trial to investigate equivalence of different time windows for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) to receive a pertussis-containing vaccine (Boostrix-inactivated poliovirus vaccine) in one of three gestational age groups, comprising group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), group 2 (24-27 weeks + 6 days), and group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) using a computer-generated randomisation list. The primary outcome was concentration of pertussis-specific antibodies in the infant born at term at birth. Maternal blood sampling was done before and 2 weeks after vaccination and at delivery, together with a cord sample, and an infant sample was collected at least 4 weeks after primary vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after vaccination. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03908164). FINDINGS Between May 7, 2019, and Feb 13, 2020, of 1010 women assessed for eligibility, 364 women were recruited and 351 received the intervention (120 in group 1, 119 in group 2, and 112 in group 3). Equivalence of time periods was demonstrated for anti-pertussis toxin and anti-pertactin IgG concentrations. The cord blood geometric mean concentrations of anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG were higher with increasing gestational age at vaccination, such that for infants in group 1 (≤23 weeks + 6 days), equivalence to group 3 (28-31 weeks + 6 days) was not shown. Reported rates of fever were similar between study groups. INTERPRETATION Pertussis vaccination at three different time intervals in pregnancy resulted in equivalent concentrations of IgG antibodies in infants against two of the three pertussis antigens assessed. Overall, these findings support recommendations to vaccinate any time between 16 weeks and 32 weeks of gestation. FUNDING The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium through the National Institute for Health and Care Research policy research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Calvert
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sneha Basude
- University Hospital Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Coleman
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Reproductive Health Research Team, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anna England
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Vanessa Greening
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bassam Hallis
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | - Edward Johnstone
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine E Jones
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Konstantinos Karampatsas
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK; Medical Research Council and Ugandan Virus Research Institute and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kampala, Uganda; Makerere University Johns Hopkins University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary Matheson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Snape
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Manu Vatish
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Research Network, Thames Valley and South Midlands
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection and Vaccine Institute St George's, University of London, London, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bary-Weisberg D, Stein-Zamir C. Vaccination timeliness and completeness among preterm and low birthweight infants: a national cohort study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:1666-1674. [PMID: 33325771 PMCID: PMC8115750 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1840255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccinating premature and low birthweight (LBW) infants according to chronological age has been found safe and effective. Although these infants are susceptible to infections, vaccinations are often delayed. We estimated vaccination coverage (VC) in preterm and LBW infants compared to term infants in a cohort study (2016 Israel birth cohort, n = 181,543) using the National Immunization Registry. Vaccinations included Hepatitis B, Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis-IPV-Haemophilus influenzae B, Oral Polio Bivalent, Rotavirus, Pneumococcal Conjugate, Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella and Hepatitis A. Inclusion criteria: (1) born in Israel; (2) having a unique identifier (allowing data matching); and (3) surviving to 24 months. VC at 24 months and timeliness of vaccine doses were evaluated according to infants' birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA). Preterm infants (GA < 37 weeks) comprised 7.0% (n = 12,264); LBW infants (BW< 2500 g) were 7.7% (n = 13,950); BW was 1500-2499 g in 6.8%, 1000-1499 g in 0.6% and below 1000 g in 0.3%. Compared to normal birthweight (NBW) infants (BW≥2500 g), LBW infants showed delayed initiation of vaccinations. Odds ratio (OR) for delay: DTaP-IPV-Hib 1 OR = 1.26 [95%CI 1.19-1.33]; Rota 1, OR = 1.22 [95%CI 1.16-1.29]. Vaccination delay rates were higher among smaller new-borns (below 1000 g). At 24 months there was no significant difference regarding vaccination status. This national cohort VC analysis focused on preterm/LBW infants. Vaccinating preterm and LBW infants according to the recommended schedule induces protection against life-threatening infectious diseases. Vaccination initiation among LBW infants showed considerable delay. Health practitioners and parents should cooperate to improve timely vaccination initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dov Bary-Weisberg
- The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Medicine, Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Chen Stein-Zamir
- The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Medicine, Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
- Jerusalem District Health Office, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tessier E, Campbell H, Ribeiro S, Fry NK, Brown C, Stowe J, Andrews N, Ramsay M, Amirthalingam G. Impact of extending the timing of maternal pertussis vaccination on hospitalized infant pertussis in England, 2014 - 2018. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73:e2502-e2508. [PMID: 32569365 PMCID: PMC8563224 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In October 2012 a maternal pertussis vaccination program was introduced in England for women between 28 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. In April 2016, the recommended optimal window was extended to 20-32 weeks to improve vaccine coverage and protect preterm infants.This study assesses the impact of offering maternal pertussis vaccination earlier in pregnancy on hospitalized infant pertussis cases. METHODS Hospitalized pertussis cases ≤60 days old in England were extracted from Hospital Episode Statistics pre-policy change and post policy change. Data were linked to laboratory-confirmed cases and clinical records were reviewed where cases were not matched. Maternal vaccine status of identified cases was established. Median hospital duration was calculated, and a competing risk survival analysis undertaken to assess multiple factors. RESULTS A total of 201 cases were included in the analysis. Of the 151 cases with reported gestational age, the number of hospitalizations amongst full-term infants was 60 cases pre-policy and 62 cases post policy, respectively while preterm cases declined from 20 to 9 (p=0.06). Length of hospital stay did not differ significantly after the policy change. Significantly longer hospital stays were seen in cases aged 0- 4 weeks (median of 3 more days than infants 5-8 weeks), premature infants (median of 4 more days than term infants) and cases with coinfections (median of 1 more day than those without coinfection). CONCLUSIONS The number of preterm infants hospitalized with pertussis in England halved after the policy change and preterm infants were no longer over-represented amongst hospitalized cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Tessier
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Helen Campbell
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Sonia Ribeiro
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Norman K Fry
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Colin Brown
- HCAI & AMR Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Julia Stowe
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Mary Ramsay
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hutchinson AF, Smith SM. Effectiveness of strategies to increase uptake of pertussis vaccination by new parents and family caregivers: A systematic review. Midwifery 2020; 87:102734. [PMID: 32470666 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cocoon immunisation strategies involve administration of Bordetella pertussis containing vaccines to parents and family members who are in close contact with newborns. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to increase uptake of vaccination against Bordetella pertussis infection by parents and family caregivers of newborn children (< 3 months of age). DESIGN A protocol driven systematic review was conducted between 2005 and February 2020. CINAHL, Medline, and Google Scholar databases were searched. SETTING Inpatient maternity care units, ante-natal and post-natal clinics based in acute care or primary/community care contexts. PARTICIPANTS (i) mothers, (ii) fathers and (iii) family caregivers or other regular household contacts of infants < 3 months of age. INTERVENTIONS Health promotion interventions and immunisation clinics designed to promote "cocoon immunisation" against Bordetella pertussis infections of the newborn. MEASUREMENTS Change in uptake of adult vaccination with a pertussis containing vaccine (dTpa or Tdap) by new parents and family caregivers. FINDINGS Eight studies were included in this review. Strategies used to promote vaccination included: written and verbal education, promotional videos, provision of vaccine prescriptions and financial incentives, opportunistic vaccination of family members and population-based health promotional messaging. Six of the eight studies reported positive impacts on vaccination uptake. Four studies evaluating providing opportunistic immunisation during the obstetric admission reported statistically significant increases in maternal (+39% to +57%), paternal (+21% to +52%) and household members (+32%) vaccination rates. Targeted public health campaigns were also found to increase vaccination uptake but in isolation were insufficient to achieve vaccination of all household contacts. CONCLUSION Promotion of pertussis vaccination to new parents and the provision of opportunistic vaccination during the obstetric admission or post-natal visit, was the most successful strategy to increase uptake of pertussis vaccination by family caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia F Hutchinson
- Deakin University, Geelong. School of Nursing & Midwifery, Centre for Quality & Patient Safety Research, Deakin/Epworth HealthCare Partnership, Melbourne Australia; Lung Sleep & Heart Health Research Network (LUSH), Western Sydney University and Deakin University.
| | - Sheree M Smith
- Western Sydney University, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Campbelltown, Sydney, Australia; Lung Sleep & Heart Health Research Network (LUSH), Western Sydney University and Deakin University.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abu-Raya B, Giles ML. Extending Antenatal Pertussis Immunization to Second Trimester or At-Birth Pertussis Immunization of Premature Infants? JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173:294-295. [PMID: 30688981 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Experimental Medicine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michelle L Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|