Assessing cultural safety in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health

Culturally safe healthcare: changing the lens from provider control to patient agency

BACKGROUND AND GOAL

Marginalized patients often feel unwelcome in healthcare. The concept of culturally safe healthcare (CSH) represents an important paradigm shift from provider control to patients who feel safe voicing health concerns and believe that they are heard by providers. This study has five goals: review works describing CSH, identify CSH themes, describe provider behaviors associated with CSH, describe interventions, and discuss how health communication can advance CSH.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted for articles published between 2019 and 2023 following modified PRISMA guidelines. Online databases included Pubmed (Medline), CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Redalyc. Thematic analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. Of these, five explained features of CSH, four were empirical studies, seven were content analyses, and five were interventions. Five themes were identified including (1) how patients perceive CSH, (2) sociocultural determinants of health inequity, (3) mistrust of care providers, (4) issues with the biomedical model of healthcare, and (5) the importance of provider-patient allyship. Care provider communication behaviors fostering CSH were discussed. Three CSH interventions were highlighted. Finally, there was a discussion for how health communication scholars can contribute to CSH.

CONCLUSIONS

CSH offers a paradigm shift from provider control to marginalized patients' experience of patient-provider communication. Recommendations for how health communication scholars can contribute to the implementation of CSH included developing guiding theories and measurement, evaluation of CSH outcomes, and conducting focus groups with patients to assess the meaning of cultural safety.

Cultural safety in radiation therapy education: Identifying knowledge deficits to improve Indigenous health practice

Reducing health disparities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples requires the integration of cultural safety into healthcare education. This commentary paper addresses cultural safety in the context of the radiation therapy profession and emphasises the importance of making practitioners aware of the knowledge gaps in healthcare practice. The educational strategies to improve cultural awareness amongst undergraduate students and qualified radiation therapists (RTs) are explored. The authors propose a range of recommendations to enhance cultural awareness amongst RTs in the context of Indigenous Australian care, aimed at promoting improved experiences for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples receiving cancer care. Curriculum integration and development of initiatives such as workshops and interactive yarning groups are highlighted as pivotal platforms that foster continuous learning in radiation therapy.

Identifying methods to best integrate indigenous knowledge and perspectives within the radiation therapy undergraduate curriculum

The Australian healthcare system continues to work towards close the gap to improve and achieve equality in health and life expectancy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. When culturally safe practice is forefront, it may be the driving force in improving Indigenous Australian healthcare outcomes. For students and practitioners to be equipped with the industry-required cultural safety skills, we believe Indigenous Australian knowledge and perspectives must be effectively integrated into undergraduate education. A scoping review of the literature was conducted to identify the most effective teaching and learning methods and assessment tools to best integrate Indigenous knowledge and perspectives into undergraduate radiation therapy curriculum at Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and PubMed-Medline were searched to access peer-reviewed studies published between 2017 and 2022. A total of 591 articles were identified with 39 full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Methods of teaching and learning and independent assessment tools that promote cultural capability in undergraduate education were identified. Findings included intensive patient-specific workshops, which were reported to provide students with an immersive learning experience, better preparing them for clinical placements and future practice. Additionally, other allied healthcare professions have utilised tools such as the Cultural Capability Management Tool (CCMT) and Trans-Cultural Self-Efficacy Tool (TSET) to quantitatively assess positive shifts and highlight developmental needs. These findings will inform current educational endeavours to promote cultural safety and the cultural capability continuum in the undergraduate radiation therapy curriculum.

How is cultural safety understood and translated into midwifery practice? A scoping review and thematic analysis

AIM

To identify and understand the scope of the literature published since January 2008 that explored Australian midwives understanding of cultural safety and how this is translated into their practice when caring for First Nations women and families.

BACKGROUND

Recognition and understanding of First Nations peoples history and culture and the impact this has on the health and wellbeing of women and their families is essential if the midwife is to promote culturally safe and respectful maternity care. The role and responsibilities of the midwife in ensuring that their practice is culturally safe are now reflected in the Australian professional midwifery codes and standards. Whilst midwifery academics' awareness of cultural safety and how it is taught within midwifery education programs have previously been explored, at present, little is known about midwives' understanding of cultural safety, and how this translates into their clinical practice.

METHODS

A Scoping Review was undertaken following Arksey and O'Malley's five step process. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses - Scoping Review extension checklist. Twelve studies met the criteria for inclusion. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and organise the results.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis, guided by two predetermined review questions led to the identification of six overarching themes: 'Awareness of deficiencies', 'The importance of meeting women's diverse needs', 'Understanding relationships as a foundation for culturally safe care', 'Working in partnership with others', 'Providing individualised care' and 'Fostering effective relationships and communication'. One sub-theme of the first theme was identified, this was named 'Seeking an understanding of culture'.

CONCLUSION

Australian midwives' level of understanding of cultural safety and how it is translated into their midwifery practice when caring for First Nations women and their families differ widely. Midwives across Australia require increased and equitable access to appropriate opportunities to improve their knowledge and understanding of cultural safety. Whilst theoretical learning on cultural safety has a place in all midwives annual mandatory training requirements, this should ideally be supplemented, where possible, with opportunities for immersive practice in communities. Immersion was considered the optimal way to gain rich knowledge and understanding to strengthen culturally safe midwifery practice. Continuity models of midwifery care which incorporate the principles of cultural safety should be consistently implemented across Australia. These models enable midwives, women, families, communities, and Aboriginal Support Workers to work in collaboration towards achieving optimal outcomes for mothers and babies.

STUDY REGISTRATION

N/A.

Health professional perspectives on translation of cultural safety concepts into practice: A scoping study

People from unique and diverse populations, (i.e., social groupings excluded by the dominant majority by, for example, ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, disability or even rurality), experience dissimilar health outcomes. Members of such populations who have long-term health conditions experience further health disparities through inefficient management and treatment. This remains a significant hindrance to achieving equity in health outcomes. Being responsive and acting upon the cultural needs of unique and diverse populations within health services is pivotal in addressing health disparities. Despite provision of professional training to health professionals, cultural competency remains an elusive goal. This scoping study summarized available literature about what helped health professionals translate cultural safety concepts into practice. We searched electronic databases using MeSH terms and keywords for English language articles and reference lists of potentially included studies. Quality appraisal was undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were charted, with a descriptive numerical summary and thematic analysis of study findings undertaken. Twelve qualitative studies with n = 206 participants were included. Learning through and from direct experience, and the individual qualities of professionals (i.e., individual capacity for relational skills and intentionality of engagement with one's own values and biases) facilitated translation of cultural safety concepts into practice. Also important was the need for cultural training interventions to address both issues of content and process within course design. Doing this would take into consideration the benefits that can come from learning as a part of a collective. In each of these themes was evidence of how health professionals needed the ability to manage emotional discomfort as part of the process of learning. A dearth of information exists exploring professionals' perspectives on translating cultural safety concepts into practice. There may be merit in designing educational interventions that look beyond the classroom. We also suggest that nurturing people's relational skills likely holds benefits to growing culturally safe practice as does increasing health professional's capacity to sit with the discomfort that occurs when paying attention to one's own and others values and biases.

ICIRAS: Research and reconciliation with indigenous peoples in rural health journals

Aim

We aim to promote discussion about an Indigenous Cultural Identity of Research Authors Standard (ICIRAS) for academic journal publications.

Context

This is based on a gap in research publishing practice where Indigenous peoples' identity is not systematically and rigorously flagged in rural health research publications. There are widespread reforms, in different research areas, to counter the reputation of scientific research as a vehicle of racism and discrimination against the world's Indigenous peoples. Reflecting on these broader movements, the editorial teams of three rural health journals—the Australian Journal of Rural Health, the Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, and Rural and Remote Health—recognised that Indigenous peoples' identity could be embedded in authorship details.

Approach

An environmental scan (through a cultural safety lens where Indigenous cultural authority is respected, valued, and empowered) of literature was undertaken to detect the signs of inclusion of Indigenous peoples in research. This revealed many ways in which editorial boards of Journals could systematically improve their process so that there is ‘nothing about Indigenous people, without Indigenous people’ in rural health research publications.

Conclusion

Improving the health and wellbeing of Indigenous peoples worldwide requires high quality research evidence. The philosophy of cultural safety supports the purposeful positioning of Indigenous peoples within the kaleidoscope of cultural knowledges as identified contributors and authors of research evidence. The ICIRAS is a call‐to‐action for research journals and institutions to rigorously improve publication governance that signals “Editing with IndigenUs and for IndigenUs”.

Strategies to Support Sustained Participant Engagement in an Oral Health Promotion Study for Indigenous Children and Their Families in Australia

The health inequities of Indigenous peoples compared with non-Indigenous peoples are significant and long-standing across many countries. Colonisation and dispossession of land and culture has led to profound and devastating consequences on the health of Indigenous peoples. A lack of trust and cultural security of health services remains a barrier to participation in health care services. Similarly, engagement in research activities is also hindered by a history of unethical research practices. Creating partnerships between researchers and Indigenous communities is key in developing research studies that are culturally appropriate, acceptable and relevant to the needs of Indigenous peoples. Baby Teeth Talk was a randomised controlled trial conducted with Indigenous children and their mothers in South Australia that tested an intervention involving dental care, anticipatory guidance on oral health and dietary intake, and motivational interviewing. The study was developed in consultation and partnership with local Indigenous communities in South Australia and overseen by the study’s Aboriginal reference group. The recruitment and retention of participants in the study has been strong over numerous waves of follow-up. The purpose of this paper is to describe the strategies employed in the study that contributed to the successful and sustained engagement of the participants. These strategies included the establishment of an Aboriginal reference group, building relationships with organisations and community, flexibility of appointment scheduling and allocating adequate time, reimbursement for participant time, developing rapport with participants, encouraging participant self-determination, and adaptation of dietary data collection to better suit participants.

Reflexive Practice as an Approach to Improve Healthcare Delivery for Indigenous Peoples: A Systematic Critical Synthesis and Exploration of the Cultural Safety Education Literature

Cultural safety is increasingly being taught in tertiary programmes of study for health professionals. Reflexivity is a key skill required to engage in culturally safe practice, however, there is currently limited literature examining how reflexivity is taught or assessed within cultural safety curricula. A systematic review of the literature up until November 2021 was conducted, examining educational interventions which aimed to produce culturally safe learners. Studies were limited to those with a focus on Indigenous health and delivered in Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. A total of 46 documents describing 43 different educational interventions were identified. We found that definitions and conceptualisations of reflexivity varied considerably, resulting in a lack of conceptual clarity. Reflexive catalysts were the primary pedagogical approaches used, where objects, people, or Indigenous pedagogies provided a counterpoint to learners’ knowledges and experiences. Information regarding assessment methods was limited but indicates that the focus of existing programmes has been on changes in learner knowledge and attitudes rather than the ability to engage in reflexivity. The results demonstrate a need for greater conceptual clarity regarding reflexivity as it relates to cultural safety, and to develop methods of assessment that focus on process rather than outcomes.