What are the perspectives of speech pathologists, occupational therapists and physiotherapists on using telehealth videoconferencing for service delivery to children with developmental delays? A systematic review of the literature

'We know the lack of services': Service lead's perspective of enablers and barriers to hearing assessment for children in metropolitan, regional and rural Australia: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore potential enablers and barriers to accessing paediatric hearing assessment from the perspective of Australian service leads, extending previous studies on this topic from the perspectives of two other stakeholder groups - parents and speech pathologists.

DESIGN

This qualitative study, expanding upon previous mixed-methods studies, applied a pragmatism paradigm.

SETTING

The study was undertaken online via Zoom and included participants who were service leads of organisations that offer hearing assessment in metropolitan, regional, rural and remote parts of Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight Australian service leads participated in semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Barriers identified were similar to barriers in previous studies. Three main themes were identified. First, children with hearing loss in Australia are well identified at birth. The second theme focused on the reduced and inconsistent hearing assessment services available after this age. Finally, service leads discussed the importance of embracing technology to solve service access difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Consultation with key stakeholders, to consider the needs of different communities within Australia, will be crucial when identifying new service delivery options.

The Development and Pilot Testing of a Fidelity Checklist for a Family-Centered Telehealth Intervention for Parents of Children with Motor Delay

This multi-methods study describes the development of a pediatric rehabilitation telehealth intervention fidelity checklist, estimates its inter-rater reliability, and documents raters' implementation experience. A literature scan and expert consultation identified eighteen key behaviors and categorized them into three subdomains, measured using a 5-point measurement system. To estimate the checklist's inter-rater reliability, three raters scored 33 video recordings. A Shrout and Fleiss Class 1,1 intraclass correlation (ICC)) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated ICCs = 0.5 (CI: 0, 0.9) for both the Therapist and the Parent-Therapists subdomains, and the Parent subdomain an ICC = 0.3 (CI: 0, 0.8). In the implementation surveys, raters reported high levels of satisfaction (100%), ease of use (84% to 88%), and confidence in their video ratings (87% to 100%). Changes in procedures and scoring were recommended. Capturing raters' implementation experiences is crucial in the early evaluation of the fidelity checklists for telehealth.

Clinicians' Decision-Making Regarding Telehealth Services: Focus Group Study in Pediatric Allied Health

BACKGROUND

Many allied health services now provide both telehealth and in-person services following a rapid integration of telehealth as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about how decisions are made about which clinical appointments to provide via telehealth versus in person.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to explore clinicians' decision-making when contemplating telehealth for their clients, including the factors they consider and how they weigh up these different factors, and the clinicians' perceptions of telehealth utility beyond COVID-19 lockdowns.

METHODS

We used reflexive thematic analysis with data collected from focus groups with 16 pediatric community-based allied health clinicians from the disciplines of speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, social work, psychology, and counseling.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that decision-making was complex with interactions across 4 broad categories: technology, clients and families, clinical services, and clinicians. Three themes described their perceptions of telehealth use beyond COVID-19 lockdowns: "flexible telehealth use," "telehealth can be superior to in-person therapy," and "fear that in-person services may be replaced."

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the complexity of decision-making in a community-allied health setting and the challenges experienced by clinicians when reconciling empirical evidence with their own clinical experience.

Telehealth-Delivered Allied Health Interventions: A Rapid Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Introduction: Telehealth is used by allied health professionals to deliver health care remotely. This umbrella review addressed the following questions: (1) What telehealth interventions have been implemented to deliver allied health care? (2) What are the reported clinical benefits, and challenges of the implementation of telehealth delivered allied health interventions? (3) What are the reported experiences of patients and clinicians? Methods: A rapid umbrella systematic review method was utilized. Following a search of five electronic databases, only systematic reviews reporting on telehealth-delivery allied health interventions published in the past 10 years were included. Reported outcomes included clinical effectiveness, implementation factors, and patient/clinician experiences. Methodological quality was established using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2. Results: After applying eligibility criteria to 571 studies, 26 studies were included. Findings indicate that telehealth-delivered allied health interventions may obtain similar clinical outcomes as compared with face-to-face appointments. Patients reported less stress and valued the reduced need to travel when telehealth was used. Patient satisfaction with telehealth delivered care was equal to face-to-face care, and no differences were noted in the capacity to build therapeutic alliance when using telehealth. Difficulties with technology use were reported by clinicians and patients. Clinicians were identified as needing increased time management skills. Cautious interpretation of findings is recommended due to the quality rating of low to critical low for the majority of individual reviews. Conclusions: Telehealth-delivered care might obtain similar clinical outcomes to face-to-face care; however, difficulties may arise during broad implementation. It is recommended that health services be strategic to overcome implementation barriers and provide targeted support to enable effective, equitable, and sustained allied health service delivery via telehealth.

Virtual nourishment: Paediatric feeding disorder management with telepractice amidst COVID-19: An allied health perspective

PURPOSE

The rapid adoption of telepractice services by health professionals was necessary to maintain service continuity for children with paediatric feeding disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, during periods where in-person therapy was restricted. The aim of this study was to explore clinical perspectives and reflections on the use of telepractice for managing paediatric feeding disorders during the pandemic.

METHOD

A post-positivist qualitative approach using thematic analysis was adopted. This study seeks to understand participants' experiences and thoughts from allied health professionals from speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, and dietetics working with paediatric feeding in Western Australia. All participants delivered at least 10 telepractice sessions to children from birth to 12 years with a paediatric feeding disorder. Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis process was used to analyse the data inductively.

RESULT

Eleven allied health professionals representing eight clinical settings in Western Australia, including speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, and dietetics, working with paediatric feeding were recruited. The results revealed four themes: families becoming the catalyst of change, clinician comfort over confidence, insights into authentic mealtimes, and the paradox of choice.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the need to build clinicians' confidence and competence, and the provision of service guidelines and training. Although many clinicians had positive experiences with telepractice, most returned to in-person delivery once COVID-19 restrictions were lifted, emphasising the importance of comfort in service delivery selection. We recognise that the findings of this study are constrained by the fact that it was conducted in a single geographical region and utilised a small qualitative sample. While telepractice was successful in managing paediatric feeding disorders, further development and implementation of telepractice guidelines are needed for telepractice to be a viable service delivery option for families and children with feeding disorders.

Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals

Digital technologies change the healthcare environment, with several studies suggesting barriers and facilitators to using digital interventions by healthcare professionals (HPs). We consolidated the evidence from existing systematic reviews mentioning barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies by HP. Electronic searches were performed in five databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase®, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE®, and Scopus) from inception to March 2023. We included reviews that reported barriers or facilitators factors to use technology solutions among HP. We performed data abstraction, methodological assessment, and certainty of the evidence appraisal by at least two authors. Overall, we included 108 reviews involving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses were included. High-quality evidence suggested that infrastructure and technical barriers (Relative Frequency Occurrence [RFO] 6.4% [95% CI 2.9-14.1]), psychological and personal issues (RFO 5.3% [95% CI 2.2-12.7]), and concerns of increasing working hours or workload (RFO 3.9% [95% CI 1.5-10.1]) were common concerns reported by HPs. Likewise, high-quality evidence supports that training/educational programs, multisector incentives, and the perception of technology effectiveness facilitate the adoption of digital technologies by HPs (RFO 3.8% [95% CI 1.8-7.9]). Our findings showed that infrastructure and technical issues, psychological barriers, and workload-related concerns are relevant barriers to comprehensively and holistically adopting digital health technologies by HPs. Conversely, deploying training, evaluating HP's perception of usefulness and willingness to use, and multi-stakeholders incentives are vital enablers to enhance the HP adoption of digital interventions.