1
|
Del Bello A, Vionnet J, Congy-Jolivet N, Kamar N. Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2024; 38:100871. [PMID: 39096886 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Department of Vascular Biology, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (I2MC), France.
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation Center and Service of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; Laboratory of Immunology, Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France; INSERM UMR 1037, DynAct team, CRCT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR1043-CNRS 5282, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh N, Lentine KL, Fleetwood VA, Woodside KJ, Odorico J, Axelrod D, Alhamad T, Maher K, Xiao H, Fridell J, Kukla A, Pavlakis M, Shokouh-Amiri HM, Zibari G, Cooper M, Parsons RF. Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers. Transplantation 2024; 108:e129-e138. [PMID: 38467588 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described. METHODS We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies. RESULTS Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically. CONCLUSIONS This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Vidya A Fleetwood
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | - Tarek Alhamad
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kennan Maher
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | - Huiling Xiao
- Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | - Gazi Zibari
- Willis-Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Broseta JJ, Montagud-Marrahí E, Arana C, Ferrer J, Cuatrecasas M, Garcia-Criado Á, Amor AJ, Diekmann F, Ventura-Aguiar P. Tacrolimus's Time Below Therapeutic Range Is Associated With Acute Pancreatic Graft Rejection and the Development of De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12591. [PMID: 38694489 PMCID: PMC11062183 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%, p = 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%, p = 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346-27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Jesús Broseta
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahí
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolt Arana
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio J. Amor
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia I Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drachenberg CB, Buettner-Herold M, Aguiar PV, Horsfield C, Mikhailov AV, Papadimitriou JC, Seshan SV, Perosa M, Boggi U, Uva P, Rickels M, Grzyb K, Arend L, Cuatrecasas M, Toniolo MF, Farris AB, Renaudin K, Zhang L, Roufousse C, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Kandaswamy R, White S, Burke G, Cantarovich D, Parsons RF, Cooper M, Kudva YC, Kukla A, Haririan A, Parajuli S, Merino-Torres JF, Argente-Pla M, Meier R, Dunn T, Ugarte R, Rao JS, Vistoli F, Stratta R, Odorico J. Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:362-379. [PMID: 37871799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maike Buettner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) and University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Catherine Horsfield
- Department of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexei V Mikhailov
- Department of Pathology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - John C Papadimitriou
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Surya V Seshan
- Division of Renal Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marcelo Perosa
- Beneficência Portuguesa and Bandeirantes Hospital of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Pablo Uva
- Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Program, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Krzyztof Grzyb
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lois Arend
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lizhi Zhang
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Candice Roufousse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelika Gruessner
- Department of Nephrology/Medicine, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Rainer Gruessner
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York, New York, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Steven White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
| | - George Burke
- Division of Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Argente-Pla
- University Hospital La Fe, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raphael Meier
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Richard Ugarte
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Sushil Rao
- Division of Solid Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, The province of Pisa, Italy
| | - Robert Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, UWHealth Transplant Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho GC, Samuel SL, Haroon U, Drage M. Youngest pancreas transplantation alone in the UK for type 1 diabetes and severe subcutaneous insulin resistance. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e255068. [PMID: 37353238 PMCID: PMC10314501 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-255068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A child diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus during her middle childhood developed severe subcutaneous insulin resistance as her illness progressed. This resulted in recurrent episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis and hypoglycaemia, eventually leading to intravenous insulin dependence. Despite intensive investigations, an organic cause was not found.The patient was in her late adolescence when she eventually received her pancreas transplant alone, the youngest patient in the UK. This case highlights severe peripheral insulin resistance as an important indication for whole organ pancreas transplantation in the paediatric population, as well as early recognition in the failure of conventional medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garm Chi Ho
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sajanee Liz Samuel
- Department of Paediatrics, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Usman Haroon
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Drage
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoo A, Riedel A, Qian I, Bartosic A, Soltani R, Kibria G, Haririan A, Drachenberg CB, Abrams PL, Odorico JS, Cooper M, Bromberg JS, Scalea JR. An Initial Analysis of the Baseline Levels of Dd-cfDNA After Pancreas Transplantation: A Prospective Study From High-volume Centers in the United States. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1459. [PMID: 36935870 PMCID: PMC10019258 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation offers patients with diabetes an opportunity for glucose homeostasis. Current blood tests to surveil for rejection have poor sensitivity and specificity for identifying rejection, and pancreas biopsies are challenging and associated with morbidity and graft loss. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is shed from transplanted organs and detectable in peripheral blood. Thus, a potential dd-cfDNA blood test assessing rejection would be clinically advantageous. Methods One hundred eighty-one dd-cfDNA samples (n) were collected from 77 patients (N) up to 132 mo posttransplant. Results The median dd-cfDNA level among all subjects was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.71%). In simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.29% (0.13%, 0.71%), and it was 0.23% (0.08%, 0.71%) in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. When isolating for when without infection or rejection, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.64%) for SPK and 0.20% (0.00%, 0.32%) for PTA. Both transplant types approached 1.0% ≤1 mo posttransplant followed by a decrease in median dd-cfDNA. During episodes of rejection or infection, median dd-cfDNA levels were greater among all transplant types. Conclusions The mean dd-cfDNA level for all pancreas transplant recipients is <1.0%, consistent with the published kidney transplant rejection threshold (>1.0%), regardless of SPK or PTA. Early posttransplant dd-cfDNA levels are transiently higher than later measurements. Dd-cfDNA elevation also correlates with rejection and infection and thus is a promising biomarker for surveilling pancreas transplant dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Yoo
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alexandria Riedel
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ian Qian
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Bartosic
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rudi Soltani
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Gulam Kibria
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abdolreza Haririan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cinthia B. Drachenberg
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Jon S. Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | | | - Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph R. Scalea
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comparison of long-term outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant versus simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant. Sci Rep 2023; 13:49. [PMID: 36593273 PMCID: PMC9807579 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant (SPLK) has certain advantages over conventional simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and may be beneficial for overcoming the paucity of organs needed for diabetic patients requiring transplant. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either SPK (n = 149) or SPLK (n = 46) in terms of pre- and post-transplantation variables, development of de novo DSA, occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft survival rates. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the SPK and SPLK groups except for the shorter cold ischemic time of kidney grafts, shorter duration of diabetes, older age of pancreas graft-donors, and younger age of kidney graft-donors in the SPLK group. Our results showed that the death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was lower in the SPLK group. In addition, the incidence of BPAR of the pancreas graft was higher in the SPLK group. There was no significant difference in the presence of de novo DSA and the rates of kidney graft failure, kidney BPAR, and mortality. Our results show that SPLK can be considered an alternative option for SPK although higher incidences of BPAR and graft failure of pancreas after SPLK need to be overcome.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Cabello M, Beneyto I, Navarro Cabello D, Tabernero G, Alonso A, Ruiz JC, Llorente S. Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study. Nefrologia 2023; 43:133-143. [PMID: 36494288 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation have improved in recent decades, but data are mainly derived from registries or prospective single-centre studies. This large epidemiological study was undertaken to investigate the impact of clinical and demographic factors on graft and patient survival in pancreas transplant recipients in Spain, and to provide robust, country-wide, practice-based data to complement registry findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological study to assess risk factors impacting patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients in eight centres in Spain. All patients transplanted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 were included; data were collected until 31 December 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for all time-to-event analyses, including patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, and BPAR. For graft survival analysis, in cases of death with functioning graft, patients were censored without any event on the date of death. For acute rejection and BPAR, patients were censored without any event on the date of death or graft loss. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were conducted to assess the association between baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and patient/graft survival. RESULTS Data were included for 241 (80.1%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, 56 (18.6%) pancreas-after-kidney transplants and 4 (1.3%) pancreas transplants alone. Mean±standard deviation time from diagnosis until transplantation was 26.1±7.5 years. Nineteen patients died, mainly due to infections (n=10); the remaining 282 patients (93.7%) survived from transplantation until the end of the study. Among 55 patients (18.3%) with pancreas graft loss, the main reasons were vascular thrombosis (n=19), chronic rejection (n=10), acute rejection (n=6) and death with a functioning graft (n=5). The overall rate of vascular-related death was 1.3% at 5 years post transplant. Univariable analysis showed that patient age and weight, donor age, previous kidney transplantation, previous cardiovascular events and need for insulin more than 48h post transplantation were significantly associated with pancreas graft survival. Of these, in multivariable analyses pancreas graft survival was inferior in patients who had received a previous kidney transplant prior to pancreas transplantation (log-rank test, p=0.0002). Glucose metabolism, renal function and cardiovascular risk factors were generally stable following transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The results of this multicentre study highlight the excellent patient and graft outcomes following pancreas transplantation, with a notably low incidence of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Isabel Beneyto
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Guadalupe Tabernero
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Angel Alonso
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Santiago Llorente
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rovira J, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro-Garcia N, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Piñeiro GJ, Montagud-Marrahi E, Cucchiari D, Revuelta I, Cuatrecasas M, Campistol JM, Ricart MJ, Diekmann F, Garcia-Criado A, Ventura-Aguiar P. Immune Profiling of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells at Pancreas Acute Rejection Episodes in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10639. [PMID: 36466442 PMCID: PMC9715609 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Profiling of circulating immune cells provides valuable insight to the pathophysiology of acute rejection in organ transplantation. Herein we characterized the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a biopsy-matched cohort (n = 67) and compared patients with biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR; 41%) to those without rejection (No-AR). We observed that CD3+ T cells, both CD8+ and CD4+, as well as CD19+ B cells were increased in patients with BPAR, particularly in biopsies performed in the early post-transplant period (<3 months). During this period immune subsets presented a good discriminative ability (CD4+ AUC 0.79; CD8+ AUC 0.80; B cells AUC 0.86; p < 0.05) and outperformed lipase (AUC 0.62; p = 0.12) for the diagnosis of acute rejection. We further evaluated whether this could be explained by differences in frequencies prior to transplantation. Patients presenting with early post-transplant rejection (<3 months) had a significant increase in T-cell frequencies pre-transplant, both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (p < 0.01), which were associated with a significant inferior rejection-free graft survival. T cell frequencies in peripheral blood correlated with pancreas acute rejection episodes, and variations prior to transplantation were associated with pancreas early acute rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro-Garcia
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gaston J. Piñeiro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ricart
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Red de Investigación Renal (REDinREN), Madrid, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angeles Garcia-Criado
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Pedro Ventura-Aguiar,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Rovira J, Bañón-Maneus E, Hierro N, Lazo M, Cuatrecasas M, Garcia-Criado M, Liang N, Swenerton RK, Cofan F, Cucchiari D, Esforzado N, Montagud-Marrahi E, Oppenheimer F, Piñeiro G, Revuelta I, Torregrosa V, Ahmed E, Soboleva K, Kaur N, Zimmermann BG, Al Haj Baddar N, Demko ZP, Escrig C, Tabriziani H, Gauthier P, Billings PR, Amor AJ, Ferrer J, Campistol JM, Diekmann F. Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Shows High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pancreas Graft Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:1690-1697. [PMID: 35289777 PMCID: PMC9311279 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas graft status in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKTx) is currently assessed by nonspecific biochemical markers, typically amylase or lipase. Identifying a noninvasive biomarker with good sensitivity in detecting early pancreas graft rejection could improve SPKTx management. METHODS Here, we developed a pilot study to explore donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) performance in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection (P-BPAR) of the pancreas graft in a cohort of 36 SPKTx recipients with biopsy-matched plasma samples. dd-cfDNA was measured using the Prospera test (Natera, Inc.) and reported both as a fraction of the total cfDNA (fraction; %) and as concentration in the recipient's plasma (quantity; copies/mL). RESULTS In the absence of P-BPAR, dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in samples collected within the first 45 d after SPKTx compared with those measured afterward (median, 1.00% versus 0.30%; median, 128.2 versus 35.3 cp/mL, respectively with both; P = 0.001). In samples obtained beyond day 45, P-BPAR samples presented a significantly higher dd-cfDNA fraction (0.83 versus 0.30%; P = 0.006) and quantity (81.3 versus 35.3 cp/mL; P = 0.001) than stable samples. Incorporating dd-cfDNA quantity along with dd-cfDNA fraction outperformed dd-cfDNA fraction alone to detect active rejection. Notably, when using a quantity cutoff of 70 cp/mL, dd-cfDNA detected P-BPAR with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 93.7%, which was more accurate than current biomarkers (area under curve of 0.89 for dd-cfDNA (cp/ml) compared with 0.74 of lipase and 0.46 for amylase). CONCLUSIONS dd-cfDNA measurement through a simple noninvasive blood test could be incorporated into clinical practice to help inform graft management in SPKTx patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañón-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Hierro
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Cuatrecasas
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M.A. Garcia-Criado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Federic Cofan
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cucchiari
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Esforzado
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Montagud-Marrahi
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federic Oppenheimer
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Piñeiro
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicens Torregrosa
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ebad Ahmed
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karina Soboleva
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Navchetan Kaur
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bernhard G. Zimmermann
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nour Al Haj Baddar
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zachary P. Demko
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cesar Escrig
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hossein Tabriziani
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Gauthier
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul R. Billings
- Pathology Department, Center for Biomedical Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio J. Amor
- Radiology Department, Center for Imaging Diagnosis, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Endocrinology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M. Campistol
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Renal Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament, Fundacio Clinic - IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khan SM, Sumbal R, Schenk AD. Impact of Anti-HLA De Novo Donor Specific Antibody on Graft Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:3022-3029. [PMID: 34772490 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this review is to provide consensus on the impact of antihuman leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) on pancreatic allograft loss. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases through August 2020 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Articles that provided or allowed estimation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for pancreatic allograft loss in patients with and without anti-HLA dnDSA were included. RESULTS Eight studies with a total of 1434 patients were included. Patients with anti-HLA dnDSA had significantly higher odds of graft failure (OR = 4.42, 95% CI [3.15-6.22], I2 = 38%). Pooled data on graft rejection showed that patients with anti-HLA dnDSA have significantly higher odds of rejection than patients without anti-HLA (OR = 3.35, 95% CI [2.28-4.91], I2 = 38%). CONCLUSION The results of our meta-analysis show that anti-HLA dnDSA is strongly associated with pancreas graft failure and rejection. Surveillance for anti-HLA dnDSA is an important component of post-transplant immune monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sualeh Muslim Khan
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | - Ramish Sumbal
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Austin D Schenk
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Cabello M, Beneyto I, Navarro Cabello D, Tabernero G, Alonso A, Ruiz JC, Llorente S. Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study. Nefrologia 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
13
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ryu JH, Ko HJ, Shim JR, Lee TB, Yang KH, Kim T, Choi BH. Technical factors that minimize the occurrence of early graft failure in pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14455. [PMID: 34390276 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic transplantation is the only treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes resulting in long-term euglycemia without exogenous insulin. However, pancreatic transplantation has become debatable following the improvements in the results of islet transplantation and artificial pancreas. Therefore, surgeons who perform pancreas transplants require the best surgical technique that can minimize technical failure. We aimed to report our experiences with pancreatic transplantations. We transplanted 65 pancreatic grafts between 2015 and 2020. Except for one death due to hypoxic brain damage after surgery, no postoperative technical failure was observed. We usually perform duodeno-duodenal anastomosis using the transperitoneal approach, with retrocolic placement of the graft pancreas. There was no leakage from the duodenum even after immunologic graft failure. To prevent venous thrombosis, which is the most common cause of technical failure, we used the inferior vena cava for anastomosis and added graft venoplasty with a patch of donor vena cava or aortic interposition graft to the bench procedure; subsequently, there were no cases of technical failure due to thrombosis post-transplantation. Therefore, the 1-year graft survival (insulin-free) rate was more than 95%. The improving the surgical technique will maintain pancreatic transplantation as the best treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Je Ho Ryu
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.,Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Ko
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jae Ryong Shim
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Tae Beom Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Kwang Ho Yang
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Taeun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Byung Hyun Choi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.,Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shih MS, Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. Pancreas transplant with enteric drainage at a single institute in Asia. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:412-418. [PMID: 34364767 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup. RESULTS There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu-Shan Shih
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bor-Uei Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bor-Shiuan Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shih-Chin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shin-E Wang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Solid-organ Transplant Diagnostics: Indications, Limitations, and Future Directions. Transplantation 2021; 105:1203-1211. [PMID: 33534526 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The last few years have seen an explosion in clinical research focusing on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in solid-organ transplants (SOT). Although most of the literature published so far focuses on kidney transplants, there are several recent as well as ongoing research studies on heart, lung, pancreas, and liver transplants. Though initially studied as a noninvasive means of identifying subclinical or acute rejection in SOT, it is rapidly becoming clear that instead of being a specific marker for allograft rejection, dd-cfDNA is more appropriately described as a marker of severe injury, although the most common cause of this injury is allograft rejection. Multiple studies in kidney transplants have shown that although sensitivity for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection is excellent, it is less so for T-cell-mediated rejection. It is possible that combining dd-cfDNA with other novel urine- or blood-based biomarkers may increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of rejection. Irrespective of the cause, though, elevated dd-cfDNA seems to portend adverse allograft prognosis and formation of de novo donor-specific antibody. Although current data do not lend themselves to a clear conclusion, ongoing studies may reveal the utility of serial surveillance for the management of SOT as following levels of dd-cfDNA over time may provide windows of opportunity to intervene early and before irreversible allograft injury. Finally, cost-effectiveness studies will be needed to guide the ideal incorporation of dd-cfDNA into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kukla A, Ventura-Aguiar P, Cooper M, de Koning EJP, Goodman DJ, Johnson PR, Han DJ, Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M, Saudek F, Vantyghem MC, Augustine T, Rickels MR. Transplant Options for Patients With Diabetes and Advanced Kidney Disease: A Review. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:418-428. [PMID: 33992729 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.02.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of β-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Eelco J P de Koning
- Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David J Goodman
- Department of Nephrology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul R Johnson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Duck J Han
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Martha Pavlakis
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Frantisek Saudek
- Diabetes Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marie-Christine Vantyghem
- CHU Lille, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Inserm U1190, Translational Research for Diabetes, Univ Lille, European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, Lille, France
| | - Titus Augustine
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Michael R Rickels
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival. SUMMARY The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited published data exist to guide the treatment of pancreas transplant rejection. METHODS We reviewed the treatment and outcomes of 158 first episodes of biopsy-proven pancreas rejection between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2016. Within each Banff grade of rejection, we compared response rates and long-term outcomes with steroids alone versus steroids plus antithymocyte globulin (ATG). RESULTS Of 158 pancreas recipients with rejection, 65 were treated with steroids alone. Eighty-three percent of patients with grade I, 60% with grade II, and 33.33% with grade III rejection responded to treatment with steroids alone. Ninety-three patients were treated with steroids plus ATG. The response rates were 69% in grade I, 76% in grade II, and 73% in grade III. Response rates and graft survival were not different with grade I rejection treated with steroids alone versus steroids plus ATG. However, response rates and graft survival were significantly better with grade III rejection treated with the addition of ATG, and graft survival rates were significantly better with grade II rejection treated with the addition of ATG. CONCLUSIONS Grade I pancreas rejection can usually be successfully treated with steroids alone, whereas grade II and III rejection should usually be treated with steroids plus ATG, as the addition of ATG improves both response rates and graft survival.
Collapse
|
20
|
Enteric Conversion of Bladder-drained Pancreas as a Predictor of Outcomes in Almost 600 Recipients at a Single Center. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e550. [PMID: 32548244 PMCID: PMC7213611 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Complications associated with bladder-drained pancreata necessitating enteric conversion are common. Data on the outcomes after enteric conversion are conflicting. We studied the association between enteric conversion and the pancreas graft rejection, loss, and mortality. Methods At our center, 1117 pancreas transplants were performed between 2000 and 2016. We analyzed 593 recipients with bladder-drained pancreata, of which 523 received solitary transplants and 70 received simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Kaplan-Meier function was used to estimate time to conversion by transplant type. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection-free survival while treating conversion as a time-dependent covariate. Subsequently, we examined the association between timing of conversion and the same outcomes in the conversion cohort. Results At 10 y posttransplant, 48.8% of the solitary pancreas recipients and 44.3% of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients had undergone enteric conversion. The enteric conversion was associated with 85% increased risk of acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001). However, the conversion was not associated with graft loss or mortality. In the conversion cohort, a longer interval from engraftment to conversion was associated with an 18% lower rejection rate (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.708-0.960; P = 0.013) and a 22% better graft survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.646-0.946; P = 0.01). Conclusions Enteric conversion was associated with increased risk of rejection, but not increased risks of graft loss or mortality. The decision to convert should consider the increased rejection risk. A longer interval from engraftment to conversion appears favorable.
Collapse
|
21
|
Rohan V, Taber D, Palanisamy A, Mcgillicuddy J, Chavin K, Baliga P, Bratton C. Impact of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Pancreas Transplant Outcomes. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2019; 17:796-802. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.2017.0296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
22
|
Rohan VS, McGillicuddy JW, Taber DJ, Nadig SN, Baliga PK, Bratton CF. Long‐standing diabetes mellitus and pancreas transplantation: An avenue to increase utilization of an ideal treatment modality. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13695. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak S. Rohan
- Division of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA
| | - John W. McGillicuddy
- Division of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA
| | - David J. Taber
- Division of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA
| | - Satish N. Nadig
- Division of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA
| | - Prabhakar K. Baliga
- Division of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Gianardi D, Furbetta N, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Bianchini M, Pisano R, Borrelli V, Campatelli A, Mosca F, Di Candio G. Gray-scale, Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pancreatic allograft surveillance: A systematic literature review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:166-172. [PMID: 30940408 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gray scale ultrasound (US), Doppler and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) represent important surveillance tools in the early post-operative period after pancreas transplantation (PTx), when complications are more common. This review summarizes the available evidence on their clinical application in this setting. METHODS We searched the Pub-Med database from inception to October 2018 for English literature on the clinical use of US, Doppler and CEUS in the post-PTx surveillance. Article selection was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria (PRISMA). RESULTS Twenty-nine articles concerning the clinical applications of US, Doppler and CEUS were identified, 13 of which, involving 264 patients, were focused on the sonographic findings in immunologic rejection, whereas 11 studies reporting on 887 patients were focused on post-PTx vascular complications. The remaining five articles, involving a total of 196 patients, described US or CEUS applied in the study of pancreatic morphology and texture to diagnose peri-graft fluids collections or to obtain experimental data on allograft endocrine function. CONCLUSIONS US, Doppler and CEUS have proven to be valuable assets in post-PTx follow up, thanks to the combination of their non-invasiveness with a high accuracy in the detection of early abnormalities, in particular regarding vascular complications. Preliminary experiences are directing towards functional research; however, future prospective trials are necessary to precisely correlate organ perfusion, early abnormalities and allograft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Italy.
| | - Simone Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Desirée Gianardi
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Furbetta
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Palmeri
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bianchini
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberta Pisano
- Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound in Transplants Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valerio Borrelli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound in Transplants Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Campatelli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound in Transplants Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Franco Mosca
- EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulio Di Candio
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Samoylova ML, Borle D, Ravindra KV. Pancreas Transplantation: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 2018; 99:87-101. [PMID: 30471744 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation treats insulin-dependent diabetes with or without concurrent end-stage renal disease. Pancreas transplantation increases survival versus no transplant, increases survival when performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus deceased-donor kidney alone, and improves quality of life. Careful donor and recipient selection are paramount to good outcomes. Several technical variations exist for implantation: portal versus systemic vascular drainage and jejunal versus duodenal versus bladder exocrine drainage. Complications are most frequently technical in the first year and immunologic thereafter. Graft rejection is challenging to diagnose and is treated selectively. Islet cell transplantation currently has inferior outcomes to whole-organ pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariya L Samoylova
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3443, Room M114, Yellow Zone, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Deeplaxmi Borle
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3443, Room M114, Yellow Zone, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kadiyala V Ravindra
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, 330 Trent Drive Room 217, DUMC Box 3512, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Utilization of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Ochsner J 2018; 18:190-192. [PMID: 30275776 DOI: 10.31486/toj.18.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histological evaluation of the pancreas graft is usually done on demand resulting in significant delays. This analysis reports on endoscopic protocol duodenal graft biopsies at regular intervals to determine feasibility, safety, and monitoring benefits. METHODS Protocol duodenal graft biopsies in 27 consecutive pancreas transplants (10 simultaneous pancreas kidney [SPK], 17 pancreas after kidney [PAK]) with a follow-up of a minimum of 12 months were performed at days 14, 30, 90, 180, 360, 430. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center classification for intestinal rejection was used. C4d staining was performed when antibody-mediated rejection was suspected. RESULTS Overall patient and pancreas graft survival was 100% and 93% at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. One hundred sixty-seven endoscopic biopsy procedures were performed in 27 grafts without any complication. Biopsies revealed rejection in 3 (30%) SPK recipients and in 15 (82%) of PAK recipients as early as 14 days posttransplant. Two patients underwent PAK retransplantation diagnosed with acute rejection at day 180. All except 1 recipient being treated for rejection, showed histological improvement following antirejection treatment. Following transient treatment success, a total of 3 pancreas grafts were lost for immunological reason. One loss was immediate despite antirejection treatment, 1 secondary to nonresolving rejection at 7 months and the third due to recurrent rejection 15 months posttransplantation. Additionally, biopsies detected vascular (venous thrombosis) and overimmunosuppression (cytomegalovirus infection) complications. CONCLUSIONS Protocol graft duodenal biopsies detect complications after whole-organ pancreas transplantation, are useful in guiding therapy, and carry potential for improving outcome.
Collapse
|
27
|
Preoperative Muscle Volume Predicts Graft Survival After Pancreas Transplantation: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:1482-1488. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
28
|
Rudolph EN, Dunn TB, Mauer D, Noreen H, Sutherland DER, Kandaswamy R, Finger EB. HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ Matching in Pancreas Transplantation: Effect on Graft Rejection and Survival. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2401-12. [PMID: 26814363 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Revised: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
To enhance selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas transplants, we sought to determine whether HLA matching improved posttransplantation outcomes. In this single-center study of 1219 pancreas transplants, we correlated posttransplantation outcomes with HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ matches and mismatches. Rejection was linearly correlated with the number of mismatches. The individual number of HLA mismatches reached significance at four or more with a 2.3- to 2.9-fold increase in rejection. The effect was most predominant with HLA-B (1.8-fold with one mismatch and 2.0-fold with two mismatches) and -DR (1.9-fold with two mismatches) loci, whereas HLA-A, -C, and -DQ matches or mismatches did not independently predict acute rejection. The affect was strongest in solitary pancreas transplants, with little impact for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK). In contrast, HLA matching did not affect graft or patient survival rates but was associated with a reduced risk of opportunistic infection. Avoidance of acute rejection saved an estimated $32 000 for solitary pancreas recipients and $52 000 for SPK recipients in hospital costs. Our data do not support the use of HLA matching for predicting pancreas graft survival but do support its significance for the reduction of acute rejection, particularly for solitary pancreas recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E N Rudolph
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - T B Dunn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - D Mauer
- Immunology/Histocompatibility Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - H Noreen
- Immunology/Histocompatibility Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - D E R Sutherland
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - R Kandaswamy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - E B Finger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Laurence JM, Barbas AS, Sapisochin G, Marquez MA, Bazerbachi F, Selzner M, Norgate A, McGilvray ID, Schiff J, Ross H, Cattral MS. The significance of pre-operative coronary interventions on outcome after pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2015; 30:233-40. [PMID: 26700761 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pancreas transplant candidates are at very high risk of coronary vascular disease. We hypothesized that the requirement for pre-operative coronary intervention (PCI) may be associated with an adverse impact on short- and long-term outcomes. Retrospective analysis of 366 consecutive primary pancreas transplants was undertaken. Outcomes were compared between recipients who had undergone PCI (n = 48) and those who had not (n = 318). In 48% (23/48) of instances, the PCI was initiated by the transplant cardiology evaluation. The recipients undergoing PCI were older than those not undergoing PCI (47.6 yr vs. 41.9 yr, respectively, p < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, there was a higher rate of post-operative major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in the PCI group (10.4%) compared with those not undergoing PCI (4.7%) (RR [95% CI]: 2.0 [0.90-4.5]; p = 0.17). In the long term, there were no differences in the rate of death with graft function (p = 0.77) or rejection (p = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to patient (p = 0.54), kidney (p = 0.76), or pancreas (p = 0.63) graft survival. PCI is not a risk factor for short-term perioperative events, and long-term transplant outcomes are equivalent to patients not requiring PCI. PCI, by itself, should not be considered a contraindication for pancreas transplantation, but should raise awareness of perioperative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome M Laurence
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Max A Marquez
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fateh Bazerbachi
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Markus Selzner
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Norgate
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D McGilvray
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Schiff
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heather Ross
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark S Cattral
- Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meirelles Júnior RF, Salvalaggio P, Pacheco-Silva A. Pancreas transplantation: review. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2015; 13:305-9. [PMID: 26154551 PMCID: PMC4943828 DOI: 10.1590/s1679-45082015rw3163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Vascularized pancreas transplantation is the only treatment that establishes normal glucose levels and normalizes glycosylated hemoglobin levels in type 1 diabetic patients. The first vascularized pancreas transplant was performed by William Kelly and Richard Lillehei, to treat a type 1 diabetes patient, in December 1966. In Brazil, Edison Teixeira performed the first isolated segmental pancreas transplant in 1968. Until the 1980s, pancreas transplants were restricted to a few centers of the United States and Europe. The introduction of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in 1994, led to a significant outcome improvement and consequently, an increase in pancreas transplants in several countries. According to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry, until December 31st, 2010, more than 35 thousand pancreas transplants had been performed. The one-year survival of patients and pancreatic grafts exceeds 95 and 83%, respectively. The better survival of pancreatic (86%) and renal (93%) grafts in the first year after transplantation is in the simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant group of patients. Immunological loss in the first year after transplant for simultaneous pancreas-kidney, pancreas after kidney, and pancreas alone are 1.8, 3.7, and 6%, respectively. Pancreas transplant has 10 to 20% surgical complications requiring laparotomy. Besides enhancing quality of life, pancreatic transplant increases survival of uremic diabetic patient as compared to uremic diabetic patients on dialysis or with kidney transplantation alone.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Important trends are being observed in pancreas transplantation in the USA. We will describe recent trends in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation related to immunosuppression, treatment of rejection, and transplantation for patients of advanced age and C-peptide positive diabetes. Recent findings Rates of pancreas transplantation have declined, despite improved pancreatic graft outcomes. Regarding immunosuppression, trends in SPK transplantation include T-cell depletion induction therapy, waning mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use and steroid use in greater than 50% of pancreas transplant recipients with few patients undergoing late steroid weaning. Rejection of the pancreas may be discordant with the kidney after SPK and there is a greater appreciation of antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft. De-novo donor-specific antibody without graft dysfunction remains an active area of study, and the treatment for this condition is unclear. SPKs are being performed with greater frequency in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and in patients of advanced age, with exemplary results. Summary The current state of the art in SPK transplantation is yielding superb and improving results.
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection of the pancreas remains a major clinical problem. In addition to cellular rejection of the pancreas, antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas is now a well-described entity. The 2011 Banff update established comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis of acute and chronic AMR. The pancreas biopsy is critical in order to accurately diagnose and treat pancreas rejection. Other modes of monitoring pancreas rejection we feel are neither sensitive nor specific enough. In this review, we examine recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreas rejection as well as describe practical diagnostic and treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| | - D B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| | - J S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Cntr-H4/756, Madison, WI 53792 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Rangel EB. Tacrolimus in pancreas transplant: a focus on toxicity, diabetogenic effect and drug–drug interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2014; 10:1585-605. [DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2014.964205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
35
|
Stratta RJ, Farney AC, Rogers J, Orlando G. Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10:117-32. [PMID: 24236648 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2014.853616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC27157, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pretransplantation GAD-autoantibody status to guide prophylactic antibody induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2013; 96:745-52. [PMID: 23912172 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182a012cc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daclizumab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have been shown to reduce allograft rejection. We assessed the safety and efficacy of daclizumab or ATG prophylaxis in combination with triple immunotherapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients. METHODS Thirty-nine type 1 diabetic patients scheduled for primary SPKT were randomized to receive prophylactic therapy with either daclizumab or ATG. A group of 27 patients without prophylactic antibodies was used for retrospective comparison. All patients received cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil and gradually tapered prednisone. Autoantibodies and cellular autoreactivity were measured to assess recurrent autoreactive responses. RESULTS Baseline and transplant characteristics were comparable among groups. Both daclizumab and ATG therapy resulted in a significant reduction in acute rejection episodes. The incidence of rejection episodes was significantly higher in pretransplantation GAD autoantibody-positive daclizumab-treated recipients compared with GAD autoantibody-negative or ATG-treated recipients. IA-2 islet autoantibodies showed no association with rejection. There were no significant differences between the groups for in vitro autoreactivity, clinical outcome, or functional parameters. CONCLUSIONS Daclizumab or ATG combined with a maintenance immunosuppressive regime consisting of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone were well tolerated and equally effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes in SPKT recipients. Up to 3 years, no adverse sequelae of the immunoprophylaxis or clinical and ex vivo recurrent autoimmunity were observed. We propose that the pretransplantation existence of GAD65 autoantibodies serves as a marker guiding the choice for prophylactic therapy in pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
|