1
|
Silva BM, Macedo FH, Hayano EEM, Germano S, Ribeiro IF, Franco CA, Requião L, Medina-Pestana J, Goes MA. Relationship of hemoglobin levels with outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplant: a retrospective cohort study. J Bras Nefrol 2024; 46:e20230014. [PMID: 38284551 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2023-0014en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anemia is frequent in patients undergoing replacement therapy for kidney failure. Anemia in the pre- and post-transplantation period might be related to kidney transplant outcomes. The current study therefore sought to assess the relationship between anemia, delayed allograft function (DGF), chronic kidney allograft dysfunction (CAD), and death from any cause following kidney transplantation from a deceased donor. METHODS This was a retrospective study with 206 kidney transplant patients of deceased donors. We analyzed deceased donors' and kidney transplant patients' demographic data. Moreover, we compared biochemical parameters, anemia status, and medicines between DGF and non-DGF groups. Afterward, we performed a multivariate analysis. We also evaluated outcomes, such as CAD within one year and death in ten years. RESULTS We observed a lower frequency of pre-transplant hemoglobin concentration (Hb) but higher frequency of donor-serum creatinine and red blood transfusion within one week after transplantation in the group with DGF. In addition, there was an independent association between Hb concentration before transplantation and DGF [OR 0.252, 95%CI: 0.159-0.401; p < 0.001]. There was also an association between Hb concentration after six months of kidney transplantation and both CAD [OR 0.798, 95% CI: 0.687-0.926; p = 0.003] and death from any cause. CONCLUSION An association was found between pre-transplantation anemia and DGF and between anemia six months after transplantation and both CAD and death by any cause. Thus, anemia before or after transplantation affects the outcomes for patients who have undergone kidney transplantation from a deceased donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Suzeli Germano
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Divisão de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Carolina Azze Franco
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Lucio Requião
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Divisão de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Hospital do Rim, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - José Medina-Pestana
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Divisão de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Hospital do Rim, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Goes
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Divisão de Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Hospital do Rim, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferreira LD, Goff C, Kamepalli S, Montgomery AE, Miggins JJ, Goss JA, Rana A. Survival Benefit of Solid-Organ Transplantation: 10-Year Update. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3810-3817. [PMID: 37402977 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08012-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Transplantation has transformed into a burgeoning field that is rapidly evolving to optimize organ distribution and survival outcomes. The years since 2012 (the last comprehensive study) have seen changes in transplantation, such as advances in immunotherapy and novel indices, that necessitate an updated analysis of survival benefit. DESIGN Our goal was to determine the survival benefit for solid-organ transplants in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for a three decade period and provide updates on advancements since 2012. Our retrospective analysis examined data containing U.S. patient records from September 1, 1987, to September 1, 2021. RESULTS We found that 3,430,272 life-years were saved over our transplant period (4.33 life-years saved per patient); kidney-1,998,492 life-years; liver -767,414; heart-435,312; lung-116,625; pancreas-kidney-123,463; pancreas-30,575; intestine-7901. After matching, 3,296,851 life-years were saved. Life-years saved and median survival increased for all organs between 2012 and 2021. Compared to 2012, median survival increased in kidney (from 12.4 to 14.76 years), liver (from 11.6 to 14.59), heart (9.5 to 11.73), lung (5.2 to 5.63), pancreas-kidney (from 14.5 to 16.88), pancreas (from 13.3 to 16.10). When compared to 2012, the percent transplanted increased in kidney, liver, heart, lung, and intestine, while pancreas-kidney and pancreas show decreased percent transplanted. CONCLUSION Our study underscores the tremendous survival benefits of solid organ transplantation (over 3.4 million life-years saved) and shows improvements since 2012. Our study also highlights areas of transplantation, notably pancreas transplants, that may necessitate reinvigorated attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam D Ferreira
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Cameron Goff
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Spoorthi Kamepalli
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ashley E Montgomery
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - John James Miggins
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - John A Goss
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Liver Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abbas Rana
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E DeBakey Department of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clinical Phenotypes of Dual Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States as Identified through Machine Learning Consensus Clustering. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58121831. [PMID: 36557033 PMCID: PMC9783488 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Our study aimed to cluster dual kidney transplant recipients using an unsupervised machine learning approach to characterize donors and recipients better and to compare the survival outcomes across these various clusters. Materials and Methods: We performed consensus cluster analysis based on recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in 2821 dual kidney transplant recipients from 2010 to 2019 in the OPTN/UNOS database. We determined the important characteristics of each assigned cluster and compared the post-transplant outcomes between clusters. Results: Two clinically distinct clusters were identified by consensus cluster analysis. Cluster 1 patients was characterized by younger patients (mean recipient age 49 ± 13 years) who received dual kidney transplant from pediatric (mean donor age 3 ± 8 years) non-expanded criteria deceased donor (100% non-ECD). In contrast, Cluster 2 patients were characterized by older patients (mean recipient age 63 ± 9 years) who received dual kidney transplant from adult (mean donor age 59 ± 11 years) donor with high kidney donor profile index (KDPI) score (59% had KDPI ≥ 85). Cluster 1 had higher patient survival (98.0% vs. 94.6% at 1 year, and 92.1% vs. 76.3% at 5 years), and lower acute rejection (4.2% vs. 6.1% within 1 year), when compared to cluster 2. Death-censored graft survival was comparable between two groups (93.5% vs. 94.9% at 1 year, and 89.2% vs. 84.8% at 5 years). Conclusions: In summary, DKT in the United States remains uncommon. Two clusters, based on specific recipient and donor characteristics, were identified through an unsupervised machine learning approach. Despite varying differences in donor and recipient age between the two clusters, death-censored graft survival was excellent and comparable. Broader utilization of DKT from high KDPI kidneys and pediatric en bloc kidneys should be encouraged to better address the ongoing organ shortage.
Collapse
|
4
|
Das D, Wagler J, Ohara S, Nguyen M, Frasco PE, Smith M, Khamash H, Mathur AK, Budhiraja P, Reddy K, Heilman R, Jadlowiec C. Outcomes of Dual Kidney Transplants from High KDPI Kidneys are Superior Compared to Single Kidney High KDPI Transplants at One-Year. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14737. [PMID: 35633507 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Dual kidney transplantation (DKT), utilizing two adult kidneys from the same donor for one recipient, has been used as way to expand the available donor pool. These kidneys often come from high Kidney Donor Profile Index donors (KDPI >85%). Data comparing outcomes between high KDPI DKT and single kidney transplants (SKT) remain limited. We assessed outcomes of 336 high KDPI kidney transplants performed at our center; 11.0% (n = 37) were DKT. Recipients of DKT were older (p = 0.02) and donors had a higher KDPI score (median 96% vs. 91%, p<0.0001). DKT operative time was higher compared to SKT (+1.4 hours, p<0.0001). There were no differences in delayed graft function (54.1% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.77) and hospital length of stay (median 4.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.21) between DKT and SKT. Grade I Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in 8.1% of DKT and 13.7% of SKT (p = 0.008). There were no grade IVa, IVb or V complications in either group. DKT had more glomerulosclerosis (p = 0.04), interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02), tubular atrophy (p = 0.01), and arterial thickening (p = 0.03) on one-year protocol biopsies. Estimated glomerular filtration was higher for DKT at one- (p = 0.004) and two-years post-transplant (p = 0.01). There were no differences in patient (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.3, p = 0.58) or graft (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.3, p = 0.83) survival. Good outcomes can be achieved with DKT using high KDPI kidneys with moderate chronic changes. DKT is a good option to help further utilize high KDPI kidneys and minimize discard. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devika Das
- Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Josiah Wagler
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Stephanie Ohara
- Division of Surgery, Valleywise Health Medical Center, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michelle Nguyen
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Peter E Frasco
- Division of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Maxwell Smith
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Hasan Khamash
- Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Kunam Reddy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Caroline Jadlowiec
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. The use of marginal kidneys in dual kidney transplantation to expand kidney graft utilization. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:75-85. [PMID: 34939967 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and identify opportunities to improve utilization of marginal deceased donor (MDD) kidneys through DKT. RECENT FINDINGS The practice of DKT from adult MDDs dates back to the mid-1990s, at which time the primary indication was projected insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short- and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects: Identifying appropriate selection criteria/scoring systems based on pre- and postdonation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing longer-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. MDDs with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or nonrecovery. SUMMARY DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. New and innovative technologies targeting ex vivo organ assessment, repair, and regeneration may have a major impact on the decision whether or not to use recovered kidneys for single or DKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Harriman
- The Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Komal Gurung
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Savoye E, Legendre C, Neuzillet Y, Peraldi MN, Grimbert P, Ouali N, Durand M, Badet L, Kerbaul F, Pastural M, Legeai C, Macher MA, Snanoudj R. Long-term survival benefit from dual kidney transplantation using kidneys from donors with very extended criteria - A French cohort between 2002 and 2014. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 37:982-990. [PMID: 34748014 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This national multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and compare them with those obtained from single kidney transplantation (SKT). METHODS Our first analysis concerned all first transplants performed between May 2002 and December 2014, from marginal donors, defined as brain death donors older than 65, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 90 ml/min/1.73m². The second analysis was restricted to transplants adequately allocated according to the French DKT program based on donor eGFR: DKT for eGFR between 30 and 60, SKT for eGFR between 60 and 90 ml/min/1.73m². Recipients younger than 65 years or with a panel-reactive antibody percentage ≥ 25% were excluded. RESULTS The first analysis included 461 DKT and 1131 SKT. DKT donors were significantly older (77.6 versus 74 years), had a more frequent history of hypertension and a lower eGFR (55.1 versus 63.6 ml/min/1.73m²). While primary nonfunction and delayed graft function did not differ between SKT and DKT, 1-year eGFR was lower in SKT recipients (39 vs. 49 ml/min/1.73m², P < 0.001). Graft survival was significantly better in DKT, even after adjustment for recipient and donor risk factors. Nevertheless, patient survival did not differ between these groups. The second analysis included 293 DKT and 687 SKT adequately allocated with donor eGFR and displayed similar results but with a smaller benefit in terms of graft survival. CONCLUSIONS In a context of organ shortage, DKT is a good option for optimizing the use of kidneys from very expanded criteria donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Savoye
- Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Service d'Urologie et de Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Foch, Université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Marie-Noëlle Peraldi
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation rénale, Hôpital Saint-Louis et Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Grimbert
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Henri Mondor and Paris Est University, Créteil, France
- Inserm U955, Créteil, France
| | - Nacera Ouali
- Service des Urgences Néphrologiques et Transplantation Rénale (UNTR), Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Durand
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France
- INSERM U1081 - CNRS UMR 7284, Université de Nice Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Groupement Hospitalier Edouard Herriot, Service d'urologie chirurgie de la transplantation, Lyon, France
| | - François Kerbaul
- Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Myriam Pastural
- Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Camille Legeai
- Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Marie-Alice Macher
- Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Renaud Snanoudj
- Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations, INSERM U1018, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taherkhani N, Sepehri MM, Khasha R, Shafaghi S. Determining the Level of Importance of Variables in Predicting Kidney Transplant Survival Based on a Novel Ranking Method. Transplantation 2021; 105:2307-2315. [PMID: 33534528 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is the best alternative treatment for end-stage renal disease. To optimal use of donated kidneys, graft predicted survival can be used as a factor to allocate kidneys. The performance of prediction techniques is highly dependent on the correct selection of predictors. Hence, the main objective of this research is to propose a novel method for ranking the effective variables for predicting the kidney transplant survival. METHODS Five classification models were used to classify kidney recipients in long- and short-term survival classes. Synthetic minority oversampling and random undersampling were used to overcome the imbalanced class problem. In dealing with missing values, 2 approaches were used (eliminating and imputing them). All variables were categorized into 4 levels. The ranking was evaluated using the sensitivity analysis approach. RESULTS Thirty-four of the 41 variables were identified as important variables, of which, 5 variables were categorized in very important level ("Recipient creatinine at discharge," "Recipient dialysis time," "Donor history of diabetes," "Donor kidney biopsy," and "Donor cause of death"), 17 variables in important level, and 12 variables in the low important level. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we identify new variables that have not been addressed in any of the previous studies (eg, AGE_DIF and MATCH_GEN). On the other hand, in kidney allocation systems, 2 main criteria are considered: equity and utility. One of the utility subcriteria is the graft survival. Our study findings can be used in the design of systems to predict the graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrin Taherkhani
- Faculty Member of Computer Engineering, Payam-e-Noor University, Saveh, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
- Department of Healthcare Systems Engineering, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Roghaye Khasha
- Center of Excellence in Healthcare Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shadi Shafaghi
- Lung Transplantation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yazdani B, Marinez J, Krüger B, Kälsch AI, Jung M, Chen G, Leipe J, Benck U, Schnülle P, Nuhn P, Keese M, Schwenke K, Krämer BK. Patient and Graft Survival After Dual Kidney Transplantation With Marginal Donors in Comparison to Matched Control Groups. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:2180-2187. [PMID: 34429190 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmortal organ donor rates remain low in Germany, whereas donor age has been increasing considerably in the last decades. As a consequence of low donation rates older and more marginal donor kidneys are accepted for transplantation. However, procured kidneys from very old a/o marginal donors may be considered as not suitable for transplantation as a single organ and subsequently be discarded. However, dual transplantation of both kidneys from such donors may provide an opportunity to nevertheless use these organs for renal transplantation, thereby providing the twofold nephron mass as a single kidney transplantation. METHODS We compared in this retrospective analysis the outcome of 10 recipients of a dual kidney transplantation (DKT) with 40 matched recipients of a single kidney transplantation (SKT). Recipients were matched for donor and recipient age (ie, a maximum age difference of ±10 years in a ratio of 1:4 for DKT vs SKT recipients). In addition, a second SKT control group of 10 SKT recipients being transplanted immediately before each DKT recipient with a kidney from a donor aged ≥65 years was used for comparison. All renal transplant recipients were observed for up to 3 years or until July 31, 2020. RESULTS Mean donor and recipient age was 77.2 ± 4.6/75.1 ± 6.6/82.1 ± 7.9 and 66.4 ± 5.8/66.1 ± 6.0/64.8 ± 8.4 for SKT group 1/SKT group 2/DKT, respectively. Procurement serum creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in the DKT group in comparison to the SKT control group 1 (P = .019) as was the rate of transplant artery atherosclerosis (P = .021). Furthermore, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Kidney Donor Risk Index were significantly higher (P = .0138/P = .064, and P < .001/P = .038) in the DKT group than in SKT group 1 and 2. Rates of acute rejection and delayed graft function were not significantly different between groups, though biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically higher in the SKT groups. Patient survival and overall and death-censored graft survival rates were also not significantly different between groups, although they tended to be higher after DKT. CONCLUSIONS DKT provides an opportunity to successfully use postmortal kidneys even from donors aged >80 years and a Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥95% for renal transplantation. DKT may thereby increase the available pool of donors to better serve patients with end-stage renal disease on the waiting list.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babak Yazdani
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; European Center of Angioscience Ecas, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julian Marinez
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Bernd Krüger
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anna-Isabelle Kälsch
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Jung
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Gangyi Chen
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; First Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jan Leipe
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Urs Benck
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Renal Center Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - Peter Schnülle
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Renal Center Weinheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Keese
- Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; European Center of Angioscience Ecas, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Kay Schwenke
- Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; European Center of Angioscience Ecas, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Transplant Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; European Center of Angioscience Ecas, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nagy I, Varga AK, Balázsfalvi N, Nemes B. Quality Assessment of Donor Kidneys and the Tendency of Kidney Acceptance: A Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:1414-1417. [PMID: 33602525 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The increasing age of donors and the increasing tendency of comorbidities requires an extension in acceptance criteria. In this review, the tendency for acceptance and refusal was analyzed by examining reasons for declining donor kidneys at the kidney transplantation center in Debrecen. This analysis aimed to assess the quality of donor kidneys and indicate why two-thirds of donated organs were refused. METHOD Our center in Debrecen received 535 kidney offers (based on exclusion criteria) between November 2016 and August 2019, which were retrospectively analyzed. Donor kidneys were evaluated using expanded criteria donor, kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and kidney donor risk index criteria systems. RESULTS Thirty-five percent (n = 189) of the kidneys offered to the center in Debrecen had been approved in advance, and later 63% (n = 119) were transplanted. Using the KDPI system, 41% of donors had a KDPI above 85, of which 23% were accepted, while acceptance of kidneys with a KDPI of 0 to 35 was around 70%. When examining causes of donor kidney refusal, 90% of the organs had donor quality problems, 13% had logistical cause (long cold ischemic time, large age difference between donor and recipient), and 10.5% had immunologic cause. In 13% of cases, the refusal of donor organs was due to the coexistence of several problems. CONCLUSION Our data showed that high-risk donor organs were being refused in our center; however, they are being transplanted at a higher rate in other Eurotransplant centers. The decision to refuse or accept donor organs depends on several factors, including expected waiting time, patient's clinical characteristics, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ildikó Nagy
- Department of Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Anita Katalin Varga
- Department of Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Norbert Balázsfalvi
- Department of Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nemes
- Department of Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ibrahim M, Greenhall GHB, Summers DM, Mumford L, Johnson R, Baker RJ, Forsythe J, Pettigrew GJ, Ahmad N, Callaghan CJ. Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:1320-1329. [PMID: 32690721 PMCID: PMC7480543 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02060220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Kidneys from elderly deceased donors are often discarded after procurement if the expected outcomes from single kidney transplantation are considered unacceptable. An alternative is to consider them for dual kidney transplantation. We aimed to examine the utilization of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years in the United Kingdom and compare clinical outcomes of dual versus single kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Data from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry from 2005 to 2017 were analyzed. We examined utilization rates of kidneys retrieved from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, and 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival of recipients of dual and single kidney transplants. Secondary outcomes included eGFR. Multivariable analyses and propensity score analysis were used to correct for differences between the groups. RESULTS During the study period, 7841 kidneys were procured from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, of which 1338 (17%) were discarded; 356 dual and 5032 single kidneys were transplanted. Donors of dual transplants were older (median, 73 versus 66 years; P<0.001) and had higher United States Kidney Donor Risk Indices (2.48 versus 1.98; P<0.001). Recipients of dual transplants were also older (64 versus 61 years; P<0.001) and had less favorable human leukocyte antigen matching (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, dual and single transplants had similar 5-year graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12). No difference in patient survival was demonstrated. Similar findings were observed in a matched cohort with a propensity score analysis method. Median 12-month eGFR was significantly higher in the dual kidney transplant group (40 versus 36 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Recipients of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years have similar 5-year graft survival and better graft function at 12 months with dual compared with single deceased donor kidney transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom .,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - George H B Greenhall
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic M Summers
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Mumford
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Johnson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Baker
- Department of Nephrology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John Forsythe
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin J Pettigrew
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Niaz Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taherkhani N, Sepehri MM, Shafaghi S, Khatibi T. Identification and weighting of kidney allocation criteria: a novel multi-expert fuzzy method. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:182. [PMID: 31492132 PMCID: PMC6729045 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0892-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney allocation is a multi-criteria and complex decision-making problem, which should also consider ethical issues in addition to the medical aspects. Leading countries in this field use a point scoring system to allocate kidneys. Hence, the purpose of this study is to identify and weight the kidney allocation criteria considering the balance between utility and equity. Methods To do this, a new fuzzy hybrid approach is proposed, which consists of two steps: In the first step, Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) is used to identify the effective criteria in the kidney allocation algorithm. In the second step, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IF-AHP) is employed to determine the weight of the criteria. Results The results showed that the highest weight belongs to “Medical emergency” criterion and the lowest weight to “5 HLA mismatches”, which is similar to Euro-transplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS). The developed method is evaluated in two steps. First, the proposed model is implemented using a real case study from the Iranian Kidney Allocation System. It was shown that the proposed model has the potential to improve allocation outcome. Second, the proposed model’s superiority to the current model is approved by the experts using the results display in the profile matrix. Finally, sensitivity analysis is performed to check the robustness of the proposed model. Conclusions This paper contributes to the kidney allocation literature by doing the following: (a) developing a comprehensive framework for identification and weightings of criteria for kidney allocation, (b) using, for the first time, the IF-AHP technique to consider hesitancy of decision makers and uncertainty in organ allocation, and (c) proposing an appropriate framework for the countries that intend to improve or modify their organ allocation system. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0892-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrin Taherkhani
- Group of Information Technology, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
- Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116, Iran.
| | - Shadi Shafaghi
- Lung Transplantation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLDD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Toktam Khatibi
- Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brar A, Yap E, Gruessner A, Gruessner R, Jindal RM, Nee R, Sattar M, Salifu MO. Trends and outcomes in dual kidney transplantation- A narrative review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:154-160. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
14
|
Rogers J, Farney AC, Orlando G, Harriman D, Reeves-Daniel A, Jay CL, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Gautreaux MD, Stratta RJ. Dual Kidney Transplantation from Donors at the Extremes of Age. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 228:690-705. [PMID: 30630083 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to analyze outcomes in recipients of pediatric dual en bloc (PEB) kidneys from small pediatric donors (SPDs, age ≤ 3 years) and dual kidney transplants (KTs) from adult marginal deceased donors (DDs) in the context of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). STUDY DESIGN This was a single center retrospective review. Recipient selection included primary transplant, low BMI, low immunologic risk, and informed consent. All patients received antibody induction with FK/MPA/± prednisone. RESULTS From 2002 to 2015, we performed 34 PEB and 73 adult dual KTs. Mean donor ages were 17 months for the PEB and 59 years for the dual KTs; mean KDPIs were 73% for PEB and 83% for dual KT, and mean cold ischemia times were 21.0 hours for PEB and 26.5 hours for dual KT. Adult dual KT recipients were older (mean age 38 years for PEB and 60 years for dual KT) and had shorter waiting times (mean 25 months for PEB and 12 months for dual KT). With a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, actual patient survival (88% for PEB and 62% for dual KT) and graft survival (71% for PEB and 44% for dual KT) rates were higher in PEB compared with dual KT. Death-censored kidney graft survival rates were 77% for PEB and 58% for dual KT. Delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 15% for PEB and 23% for dual KT; incidences of DGF in single kidney transplantations from SPDs and adult nonmarginal DDs were 20% and 32%, respectively. Based on actual 5-year graft survival rates, the adjusted KDPIs for dual PEB and dual KTs were 3% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Acceptable mid-term outcomes are associated with PEB and adult dual KTs, which may expand the donor pool and prevent kidney discard. The KDPI is inaccurate for predicting outcomes from either PEB from SPDs or dual KT from adult marginal DDs, which may prevent acceptance of these organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Colleen L Jay
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - William Doares
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Scott Kaczmorski
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Narvaez JRF, Nie J, Noyes K, Leeman M, Kayler LK. Hard-to-place kidney offers: Donor- and system-level predictors of discard. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2708-2718. [PMID: 29498197 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Understanding risk factors for deceased-donor kidney nontransplantation is important since discard rates remain high. We analyzed DonorNet® data of consecutive deceased-donor nonmandatory share primary kidney-only offers to adult candidates at our center and beyond between July 1, 2015 and March 31, 2016 for donor- and system-level risk factors of discard, defined as nontransplantation at our or subsequent transplant centers. Exclusions were hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus core antibody status, blood type AB, and donor <1 year based on low candidate waitlist size. Of 456 individual kidney offers, from 296 donors, 73% were discarded. Most were national (93%) offers from Kidney Donor Profile Index 35-85% (n = 233) or >85% (n = 208) donors late in the allocation sequence with prior refusals logged for numerous candidates. On multivariate regression, factors significantly associated with discard were donor cerebrovascular accident (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.32), cancer transmission concern (aOR: 6.5), renal artery luminal compromise (aOR: 3.97), biopsy score ≥3 (aOR: 5.09), 2-hour pump resistive index >0.4 (aOR: 3.27), absence of pump (aOR: 2.58), nonspecific kidney abnormality (aOR: 2.76), increasing offer cold ischemia time category 11-15, 16-20, and >21 hours (aOR: 2.07, 2.33, 2.82), nighttime notification (aOR: 2.19), and neither kidney placed at time of offer (aOR: 2.74). Many traditional determinants of discard lack discriminatory value when granular factors are assessed. System-level factors also influence discard and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Reinier F Narvaez
- Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jing Nie
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Katia Noyes
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Mary Leeman
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Liise K Kayler
- Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.,University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.,Transplant and Kidney Care Regional Center of Excellence, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bikbov B. R Open Source Programming Code for Calculation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index and Kidney Donor Risk Index. KIDNEY DISEASES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2018; 4:269-272. [PMID: 30574504 PMCID: PMC6276747 DOI: 10.1159/000492427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) were developed by the United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). They may influence the clinical decision whether to accept or discard a donor kidney, but still there are debates about KDPI/KDRI applicability and its consequences. To further evaluate these indexes in different populations, more data should be analyzed, and a universally applicable program code would facilitate it. Currently, KDPI/KDRI calculation could be readily done only on the OPTN website that is convenient for a single donor, but not suitable for processing data sets with many records. SUMMARY A universally applicable program algorithm in widely used R language for calculating KDPI and KDRI was developed according to donor factors and coefficients described in the OPTN guide. KEY MESSAGES The open R code permits to calculate KDPI/KDRI either for a single donor or for an unlimited number of records in large data sets. The presented software code would save substantial time to research groups all over the world and help to clarify the KDPI/KDRI role in global settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Bikbov
- Academician V.I.Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, Moscow, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arpornsujaritkun N, Jirasiritham S, Pootracool P, Tirapanich W, Gesprasert G, Sakulchairungrueng B, Wiwattanathum P, Leelaudomlipi S, Sriphojanart S. Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience in Thailand. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2461-2464. [PMID: 30316379 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual kidney transplants (DKTs) from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) have been performed in our hospital since 2014. We needed to review our clinical outcome and update criteria to selected ECDs for DKTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2014 and December 2016, 4 DKTs and 269 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed. The outcome of DKTs was reviewed. The literature was reviewed for surgical technique and indication for DKT. RESULTS Four DKTs were performed between 2014 and 2016. One-year graft survival rate was 100%. One patient developed delayed graft function. No morbidity or mortality occurred. CONCLUSIONS DKTs in our center were safe and had good outcome with optimized selected criteria. DKT can improve the rate of kidney transplant in a developing country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Arpornsujaritkun
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - S Jirasiritham
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - P Pootracool
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - W Tirapanich
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - G Gesprasert
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - B Sakulchairungrueng
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - P Wiwattanathum
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S Leelaudomlipi
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S Sriphojanart
- Vascular and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mendel L, Albano L, Bentellis I, Yandza T, Bernardi C, Quintens H, Tibi B, Jourdan J, Durand M, Amiel J, Chevallier D. Safety of dual kidney transplantation compared to single kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors: a single center cohort study of 39 recipients. Transpl Int 2018; 31:1110-1124. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Mendel
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Laetitia Albano
- Department of Nephrology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Imad Bentellis
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Thierry Yandza
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Caroline Bernardi
- Department of Forensic Medicine; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Herve Quintens
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Brannwel Tibi
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Jacques Jourdan
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Matthieu Durand
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | - Jean Amiel
- Department of Urology; University Hospital of Nice; Nice France
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan G Tullius
- From Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (S.G.T.); and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore (H.R.)
| | - Hamid Rabb
- From Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (S.G.T.); and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore (H.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Casati C, Colombo VG, Perrino M, Rossetti OM, Querques M, Giacomoni A, Binaggia A, Colussi G. Renal Transplants from Older Deceased Donors: Use of Preimplantation Biopsy and Differential Allocation to Dual or Single Kidney Transplant according to Histological Score Has No Advantages over Allocation to Single Kidney Transplant by Simple Clinical Indication. J Transplant 2018; 2018:4141756. [PMID: 29862061 PMCID: PMC5976897 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4141756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grafts from elderly donors (ECD) are increasingly allocated to single (SKT) or dual (DKT) kidney transplantation according to biopsy score. Indications and benefits of either procedure lack universal agreement. METHODS A total of 302 ECD-transplants in period from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2015, were allocated to SKT (SKTpre) on clinical grounds alone (before Dec 2010, pre-DKT era, n = 170) or according to a clinical-histological protocol (after Dec 2010, DKT era, n = 132) to DKT (n = 48), SKT biopsy-based protocol ("high-risk", SKThr, n = 51), or SKT clinically based protocol ("low-risk", SKTlr, n = 33). Graft and patient survival were compared between the two periods and between different transplant categories. RESULTS Graft and overall survival in recipients from ECD in pre-DKT and DKT era did not differ (5-year graft survival 87.7% and 84.2%, resp.); equal survival in the 2 ECD periods was shown in both donor age ranges of 60-69 and >70-years, and in low-risk or high-risk ECD categories. Within the DKT protocol SKThr showed worst graft and overall survival in the 60-69 donor age range; DKT did not result in significantly better outcome than SKT from ECD in either era. One-year posttransplant creatinine clearance in recipients did not differ between any ECD transplant category. At 3 and 5 years after transplantation there were significantly higher total dialysis-free recipient life years from an equal donor number in the pre-DKT era than in the DKT protocol. CONCLUSIONS Use of a biopsy-based protocol to allocate grafts from aged donors to SKT or DKT did not result in better short term graft survival than a clinically based protocol with allocation only to SKT and reduced overall recipient dialysis-free life years in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Casati
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeriana Giuseppina Colombo
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Perrino
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marialuisa Querques
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giacomoni
- Division of Transplant Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Agnese Binaggia
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Colussi
- Division of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Orlando G, Khan MA, El-Hennawy H, Farney AC, Rogers J, Reeves-Daniel A, Gautreaux MD, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Stratta RJ. Is prolonged cold ischemia a contraindication to using kidneys from acute kidney injury donors? Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13185. [PMID: 29285808 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
To determine the impact of prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) on the outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI) renal grafts, we therefore performed a single-center retrospective analysis in adult patients receiving kidney transplantation (KT) from AKI donors. Outcomes were stratified according to duration of CIT. A total of 118 patients receiving AKI grafts were enrolled. Based on CIT, patients were stratified as follows: (i) <20 hours, 27 patients; (ii) 20-30 hours, 52 patients; (iii) 30-40 hours, 30 patients; (iv) ≥40 hours, nine patients. The overall incidence of delayed graft function DGF was 41.5%. According to increasing CIT category, DGF rates were 30%, 42%, 40%, and 78%, respectively (P = .03). With a mean follow-up of 48 months, overall patient and graft survival rates were 91% and 81%. Death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates were 84% and 88% for patients with and without DGF (P = NS). DCGS rates were 92% in patients with CIT <20 hours compared to 85% with CIT >20 hours (P = NS). In the nine patients with CIT >40 hours, the 4-year DCGS rate was 100%. We conclude that prolonged CIT in AKI grafts may not adversely influence outcomes and so discard of AKI kidneys because of projected long CIT is not warranted when donors are wisely triaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Muhammad A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Hany El-Hennawy
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael D Gautreaux
- Section of Nephrology, Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - William Doares
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Scott Kaczmorski
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Review of Past and Prospect for Future. INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARLY RESEARCH NOTICES 2017; 2017:2693681. [PMID: 28752128 PMCID: PMC5511653 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2693681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation (KT) is one of the treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease. The number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation is growing day by day. Various strategies have been put in place to expand the donor pool. Extended criteria donors are now accepted more frequently. Increasing number of elderly donors with age > 60 years, history of diabetes or hypertension, and clinical proteinuria are accepted as donor. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) is also more frequently done and experience with this technique is slowly building up. DKT not only helps to reduce the number of patients on waiting list but also limits unnecessary discard of viable organs. Surgical complications of DKT are comparable to single kidney transplantation (SKT). Patient and graft survivals are also promising. This review article provides a summary of evidence available in the literature.
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang SS, Park JB. Kidney Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donor in Korea: It's Time to Have Our Own Criteria Based on Our Experiences. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2017. [DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2017.31.1.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Seok Yang
- Division of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jae Berm Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
La transplantation rénale et ses défis. Prog Urol 2016; 26:1001-1044. [PMID: 27720627 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
26
|
Heilman RL, Mathur A, Smith ML, Kaplan B, Reddy KS. Increasing the Use of Kidneys From Unconventional and High-Risk Deceased Donors. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:3086-3092. [PMID: 27172238 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we have reviewed the literature and report on kidney donors that are currently used at relatively low rates. Kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) seem to have outcomes equivalent to those from donors without AKI, provided one can rule out significant cortical necrosis. Kidneys from donors with preexisting diabetes or hypertension may have marginally lower aggregate survival but still provide patients with a significant benefit over remaining on the wait list. The Kidney Donor Profile Index derives only an aggregate association with survival with a very modest C statistic; therefore, the data indicated that this index should not be the sole reason to discard a kidney, except perhaps in patients with extremely low estimated posttransplant survival scores. It is important to note that the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients models of risk adjustment should allay concerns regarding regulatory issues for observed outcomes falling below expectations. The successful utilization of kidneys from donation after cardiac death over the past decade shows how expanding our thinking can translate into more patients benefiting from transplantation. Given the growing number of patients on the wait list, broadening our approach to kidney acceptance could have an important impact on the population with end-stage renal disease. Many lives could be prolonged by carefully considering use of kidneys that are often discarded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Heilman
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
| | - A Mathur
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M L Smith
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - B Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - K S Reddy
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stratta RJ, Farney AC, Orlando G, Farooq U, Al-Shraideh Y, Palanisamy A, Reeves-Daniel A, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Gautreaux MD, Iskandar SS, Hairston G, Brim E, Mangus M, El-Hennawy H, Khan M, Rogers J. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors successfully expand the limited deceased donor organ pool. Clin Transplant 2016; 30:380-92. [PMID: 26782941 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to expand the organ donor pool remains a formidable challenge in kidney transplantation (KT). The use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) represents one approach, but kidney discard rates are high because of concerns regarding overall quality. Dual KT (DKT) may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from marginal donors. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a single-center retrospective review of outcomes in adult recipients of DKTs from adult marginal deceased donors (DD) defined by limited renal functional capacity. If the calculated creatinine clearance in an adult DD was <65 mL/min, then the kidneys were transplanted as a DKT. RESULTS Over 11.5 yr, 72 DKTS were performed including 45 from ECDs, 17 from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, and 10 from standard criteria donors (SCD). Mean adult DD and recipient ages were both 60 yr, including 29 DDs and 26 recipients ≥65 yr of age. Mean pre-DKT waiting and dialysis vintage times were 12 months and 25 months, respectively. Actual patient and graft survival rates were 84.7% and 70.8%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 58 months. One yr and death-censored graft survival rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. Outcomes did not differ by DD category, recipient age, or presence of delayed graft function (DGF). Eleven patients died at a mean of 32 months post-DKT (eight with functioning grafts) and 13 other patients experienced graft losses at a mean of 33 months. The incidence of DGF was 25%; there were two cases (2.8%) of primary non-function. Mean length of initial hospital stay was 7.2 d. Mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate levels at 12 and 24 months were 1.5 and 53 and 1.5 mg/dL and 51 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. DKT graft survival and function were superior to concurrent single ECD and similar to concurrent SCD KTs. Two patients underwent successful kidney retransplantation, so the dialysis-free rate in surviving patients was 87%. The proportion of total renal function transplanted from adult DD to DKT recipients was 77% compared to 56% for patients receiving single KTs. CONCLUSIONS Dual kidney transplantation using kidneys from adult marginal DDs that otherwise might be discarded offer a viable option to counteract the growing shortage of acceptable single kidneys. Excellent medium-term outcomes can be achieved and waiting times can be reduced in a predominantly older recipient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Umar Farooq
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Yousef Al-Shraideh
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amudha Palanisamy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - William Doares
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Scott Kaczmorski
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael D Gautreaux
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Samy S Iskandar
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gloria Hairston
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Brim
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Margaret Mangus
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Hany El-Hennawy
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Muhammad Khan
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
In all modern societies, the percentage of elderly people is increasing. However, this does not necessary reflect the percentage of patients waiting for a new kidney and the availability of organs for this entity differs markedly between countries. Thus, allocation strategies for elderly kidney recipients should be based on the characteristics of the specific countries and take into account: access to the waiting list and availability of living as well as marginal and conventional post-mortem donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, München, Germany.
| | - Lutz Renders
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ramanathan R, Gupta G, Kim J, Quinn K, Behnke M, Kang L, Sharma A. Retroactive application of the new kidney allocation system to renal transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:1148-55. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Ramanathan
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Joohyun Kim
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Keri Quinn
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Martha Behnke
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Le Kang
- Department of Biostatistics; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| | - Amit Sharma
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
White AD, Roberts H, Ecuyer C, Brady K, Pathak S, Clark B, Hostert LH, Attia MS, Wellberry-Smith M, Hudson A, Ahmad N. Impact of the new fast track kidney allocation scheme for declined kidneys in the United Kingdom. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:872-81. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alan D. White
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Heather Roberts
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Clare Ecuyer
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Kathryn Brady
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Brendan Clark
- Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Lutz H. Hostert
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Magdy S. Attia
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | | | - Alex Hudson
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant; Bristol UK
| | - Niaz Ahmad
- Division of Surgery; Department of Transplantation; St James' University Hospital; Leeds UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Medina-Polo J, Pamplona-Casamayor M, Miranda-Utrera N, González-Monte E, Passas-Martínez JB, Andrés Belmonte A. Dual kidney transplantation involving organs from expanded criteria donors: a review of our series and an update on current indications. Transplant Proc 2015; 46:3412-5. [PMID: 25498062 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our purpose was to review our kidney transplantation program based on the use of expanded criteria donors, and to determine current indications for dual kidney transplantation (DKT). In 1996, a program was initiated to transplant kidneys from donors of over 60 years performing single or dual transplantation. METHODS In 1996, a program was initiated to transplant kidneys from donors of over 60 years performing single or dual transplantation. DKT were performed with donors >75 and donors between 60 and 74 years of age and glomerulosclerosis of >15%. The kidneys of donors between 60 and 74 years of age and with glomerulosclerosis of <15% were used for single kidney transplantation (SKT). In 2005, we started to perform SKT despite glomerulosclerosis being >15%, taking into account donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS From 1996 to 2004, 222 SKTs and 88 DKTs were performed. Graft survival after 1 and 4 years was, respectively, 91% and 78% for SKT and 95% and 79% for DKT. In 2005, we started to perform SKT despite glomerulosclerosis being >15%, taking into account donor and recipient characteristics. From 2005 to 2011, 328 SKT and 32 DKT were performed. During this period most kidneys used for DKT were from female donors >75 years old, weighing <65 kg, with a creatinine of >1 mg/dL and glomerulosclerosis of >15%. The recipients for DKT were mostly male, <70 years old and whose weight was >75 kg. CONCLUSION DKT from expanded criteria donors shows good outcomes. However, in many cases SKT may fulfill the need of the recipient. The archetype for DKT is an older female weighing <65 kg and the most common recipient is an overweight male who is <70 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Medina-Polo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - N Miranda-Utrera
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - E González-Monte
- Department of Nephrology and Transplant Coordination, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - A Andrés Belmonte
- Department of Nephrology and Transplant Coordination, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
|
34
|
Hod T, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS. Clinical issues in renal transplantation in the elderly. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:167-75. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy Hod
- Center for Vascular Biology Research; Department of Medicine; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School; Boston MA USA
- Division of Nephrology; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School; Boston MA USA
| | - Alexander S. Goldfarb-Rumyantzev
- Division of Nephrology; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School; Boston MA USA
- Transplant Institute; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Thurow C, Arwinski S, Schleicher C, Hopt UT, Bausch D, Drognitz O, Pisarski P. Poor organ quality and donor-recipient age mismatch rather than poor donation rates account for the decrease in deceased kidney transplantation rates in a Germany Transplant Center. Transpl Int 2014; 28:191-8. [PMID: 25345374 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Revised: 07/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is limited not by technical or immunological challenges but by lack of donor organs. Whereas the number of patients on waiting list increased, the transplantation rate decreased. We analyzed the development of decline rates and reasons as well as the fate of declined organs. In total, 1403 organs offered to 1950 patients between 2001 and 2010 were included. Of 440 organs offered between 2009 and 2011 that were declined, we investigated whether these organs were transplanted elsewhere and requested delayed graft function, creatinine, graft and patient survival. Data were compared to results of transplantations at the same time at our center. Decline rate increased from 47% to 87%. Main reasons were poor organ quality and donor-recipient age or size mismatch. Of the rejected organs, 55% were transplanted at other centers with function, graft and patient survival equivalent to patients transplanted at our center during that period. The number of decline has increased over time mainly due to a growing number of marginal donors accounting for poor organ quality or a mismatch of donor and recipient. If proper donor-recipient selection is performed, many organs that would otherwise be discarded can be transplanted successfully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dietlind Tittelbach-Helmrich
- Department of Surgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
In patients with end-stage renal disease, kidney transplantation is the best means to extend survival and offer a better quality of life. The current shortage of organs available for transplantation has led to an effort to expand the kidney donor pool, including the use of nonideal donor kidneys. Assessment of the quality of the donated kidney is essential, and would facilitate the decision to transplant a potential organ or discard it. Multiple clinical and histologic parameters have been examined to evaluate the donor kidney and relate the findings to the graft outcome, but clear-cut criteria are yet to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasreen Mohamed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Amer Bin Thabet Street-mbc035, PO Box 15215, Dammam 31444, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tanriover B, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, Radhakrishnan J, Nickolas TL, Stone PW, Tsapepas DS, Crew RJ, Dube GK, Sandoval PR, Samstein B, Dogan E, Gaston RS, Tanriover JN, Ratner LE, Hardy MA, Chvojka J, da Motta H, Devan J, Dytman SA, Díaz GA, Eberly B, Felix J, Fields L, Fiorentini GA, Gago AM, Gallagher H, Gran R, Harris DA, Higuera A, Hurtado K, Jerkins M, Kafka T, Kordosky M, Kulagin SA, Le T, Maggi G, Maher E, Manly S, Mann WA, Marshall CM, Martin Mari C, McFarland KS, McGivern CL, McGowan AM, Miller J, Mislivec A, Morfín JG, Muhlbeier T, Naples D, Nelson JK, Norrick A, Osta J, Palomino JL, Paolone V, Park J, Patrick CE, Perdue GN, Rakotondravohitra L, Ransome RD, Ray H, Ren L, Rodrigues PA, Savage DG, Schellman H, Schmitz DW, Simon C, Snider FD, Solano Salinas CJ, Tagg N, Valencia E, Velásquez JP, Walton T, Wolcott J, Zavala G, Zhang D, Ziemer BP. Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:404-15. [PMID: 24472195 PMCID: PMC4058786 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Revised: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Half of the recovered expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are discarded in the United States. A new kidney allocation system offers kidneys at higher risk of discard, Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)>85%, to a wider geographic area to promote broader sharing and expedite utilization. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) based on the KDPI is a potential option to streamline allocation of kidneys which otherwise would have been discarded. To assess the clinical utility of the KDPI in kidneys at higher risk of discard, we analyzed the OPTN/UNOS Registry that included the deceased donor kidneys recovered between 2002 and 2012. The primary outcomes were allograft survival, patient survival and discard rate based on different KDPI categories (<80%, 80-90% and >90%). Kidneys with KDPI>90% were associated with increased odds of discard (OR=1.99, 95% CI 1.74-2.29) compared to ones with KDPI<80%. DKTs of KDPI>90% were associated with lower overall allograft failure (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89) and better patient survival (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98) compared to single ECD kidneys with KDPI>90%. Kidneys at higher risk of discard may be offered in the up-front allocation system as a DKT. Further modeling and simulation studies are required to determine a reasonable KDPI cutoff percentile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Tanriover
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY,Corresponding author: Bekir Tanriover,
| | - S. Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - D. J. Cohen
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - J. Radhakrishnan
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - T. L. Nickolas
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - P. W. Stone
- Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
| | - D. S. Tsapepas
- Department of Pharmacy, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | - R. J. Crew
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - G. K. Dube
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - P. R. Sandoval
- Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - B. Samstein
- Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - E. Dogan
- Division of Nephrology, Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - R. S. Gaston
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - L. E. Ratner
- Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - M. A. Hardy
- Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - J Chvojka
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - H da Motta
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil
| | - J Devan
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - S A Dytman
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - G A Díaz
- Sección Física, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Apartado 1761, Lima, Peru
| | - B Eberly
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - J Felix
- Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
| | - L Fields
- Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
| | - G A Fiorentini
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil
| | - A M Gago
- Sección Física, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Apartado 1761, Lima, Peru
| | - H Gallagher
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - R Gran
- Department of Physics, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, USA
| | - D A Harris
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - A Higuera
- Campus León y Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lascurain de Retana No. 5, Col. Centro. Guanajuato 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | - K Hurtado
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil and Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Apartado 31139 Lima, Peru
| | - M Jerkins
- Department of Physics, University of Texas, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - T Kafka
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - M Kordosky
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - S A Kulagin
- Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - T Le
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | - G Maggi
- Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680 Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - E Maher
- Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, 375 Church Street, North Adams, Massachusetts 01247, USA
| | - S Manly
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - W A Mann
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - C M Marshall
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | | | - K S McFarland
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - C L McGivern
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - A M McGowan
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - J Miller
- Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680 Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - A Mislivec
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - J G Morfín
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - T Muhlbeier
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil
| | - D Naples
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - J K Nelson
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - A Norrick
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - J Osta
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - J L Palomino
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, Brazil
| | - V Paolone
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - J Park
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - C E Patrick
- Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
| | - G N Perdue
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | | | - R D Ransome
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | - H Ray
- Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
| | - L Ren
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - P A Rodrigues
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - D G Savage
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - H Schellman
- Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
| | - D W Schmitz
- Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| | - C Simon
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, USA
| | - F D Snider
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | | | - N Tagg
- Department of Physics, Otterbein University, 1 South Grove Street, Westerville, Ohio 43081, USA
| | - E Valencia
- Campus León y Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lascurain de Retana No. 5, Col. Centro. Guanajuato 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | - J P Velásquez
- Sección Física, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Apartado 1761, Lima, Peru
| | - T Walton
- Department of Physics, Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia 23668, USA
| | - J Wolcott
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14610, USA
| | - G Zavala
- Campus León y Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lascurain de Retana No. 5, Col. Centro. Guanajuato 36000, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | - D Zhang
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - B P Ziemer
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|