Heart and combined heart-kidney transplantation in patients with concomitant renal insufficiency and end-stage heart failure

Heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart diseases: A comprehensive meta-analysis on waiting times, operative, and survival outcomes

The rising prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) among adults has led to increased heart transplantation (HT) procedures in this population. However, CHD patients face significant challenges including longer waiting times, higher early mortality rates, and increased risks of complications such as renal dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 50 studies to assess waiting times, postoperative outcomes, and survival rates in CHD patients undergoing HT compared to non-CHD patients. Results revealed that CHD patients experience longer HT waiting times (mean difference [MD]: 53.86 days, 95 % CI: [22.00, 85.72], P = 0.0009) and increased ischemic times (MD: 20.01 min, 95 % CI: [10.51, 29.51], P < 0.0001), which may increase waitlist and early postoperative mortality. Regarding complications, renal dysfunction is more prevalent in CHD patients than in non-CHD patients (RR: 2.05, 95 % CI: [1.61, 2.61], P < 0.00001). Despite these challenges, long-term survival rates for CHD patients are comparable to those of non-CHD recipients, with significant improvements noted in recent allocation systems. Our findings emphasize the need for ongoing refinements in HT allocation systems to improve outcomes for CHD patients, particularly in reducing waiting times and managing post-transplant complications.

Evolving indications and management patterns in heart - kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dual heart - kidney transplantation (HKT) is an increasingly utilized option for patients with end-stage heart failure and impaired renal function. In 2023, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) formalized indications for simultaneous heart - kidney transplantation (SHKT) and kidney-after-heart transplantation (KAHT). In light of this landmark effort, we review the evolution in HKT indications, outcomes after SHKT and KAHT in various patient populations, novel considerations in pre and posttransplant management, and areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The UNOS policy was borne out of retrospective outcome studies suggesting that SHKT is superior to single-organ heart transplantation (HT) in select patients with sufficiently severe renal impairment. KAHT utilization continues to evolve, providing a helpful safety net for HT recipients with irreversible worsening of renal function. Time-limited pretransplant device trials are useful for identifying optimal candidates for HKT, and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens can preserve posttransplant renal function. Explorations into artificial intelligence algorithms and biomarker technology represent interesting future opportunities.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have refined selection and management of dual HKT recipients. The new UNOS policies now provide helpful standardization to the field. Rapid innovation to date has made dual HKT an exciting therapeutic strategy for patients with few options left.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Evaluation and post-transplant management of children after multi-organ-with-kidney transplantation

Multi-organ transplantation involves the transplant of two or more organs from a single donor into a single recipient; in most cases, one of these organs is a kidney. Multi-organ transplantation is uncommon in pediatric transplantation but can be life-saving or significantly life-improving for children with rare diseases, including primary heart, liver, pancreas, or intestinal failure with secondary kidney failure, metabolic disorders, and genetic conditions causing multi-organ dysfunction. This manuscript reviews the current state of pediatric multi-organ transplantation that includes a kidney, with a focus on indications, evaluation, and key differences in management compared to kidney-alone transplantation. Guidelines and consensus statements for pediatric multi-organ transplantation are nonexistent; this review condenses reported statistics and peer-reviewed expert opinion while highlighting areas in need of further research.

Outcomes following concomitant multiorgan heart transplantation from circulatory death donors: The United States experience

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has reemerged as a method of expanding the donor heart pool. Given the high waitlist mortality of multiorgan heart candidates, we evaluated waitlist outcomes associated with willingness to consider DCD offers and post-transplant outcomes following DCD transplant for these candidates.

METHODS

We identified adult multiorgan heart candidates and recipients between January 1, 2020 and March 31, 2023 nationally. Among candidates that met inclusion criteria, we compared the cumulative incidence of transplant, with waitlist death/deterioration as a competing risk, by willingness to consider DCD offers. Among recipients of DCD versus brain death (DBD) transplants, we compared perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival.

RESULTS

Of 1,802 heart-kidney, 266 heart-liver, and 440 heart-lung candidates, 15.8%, 12.4%, and 31.1%, respectively, were willing to consider DCD offers. On adjusted analysis, willingness to consider DCD offers was associated with higher likelihood of transplant for all multiorgan heart candidates and decreased likelihood of waitlist deterioration for heart-lung candidates. Of 1,100 heart-kidney, 173 heart-liver, and 159 heart-lung recipients, 5.4%, 2.3%, and 2.5%, respectively, received DCD organs. Recipients of DCD and DBD heart-kidney transplants had a similar likelihood of perioperative outcomes and 1-year survival. All other DCD multiorgan heart recipients have survived to the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiorgan heart candidates who were willing to consider DCD offers had favorable waitlist outcomes, and heart-kidney recipients of DCD transplants had similar post-transplant outcomes to recipients of DBD transplants. We recommend the use of DCD organs to increase the donor pool for these high-risk candidates.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant compared with heart transplant alone in patients with borderline renal function who are not dialysis dependent

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients who are not dependent on dialysis receiving simultaneous heart kidney transplantation versus heart transplantation alone (HTA) to identify optimal eGFR threshold where combined transplant strategy may be superior.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 7896 adult patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/minute from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received HTA or simultaneous heart kidney transplant between 2005 and 2021, excluding those who received pretransplant dialysis. Subjects were further stratified into 3 groups based on chronic kidney disease stage at time of transplant: Stage 3A (eGFR 45-59 mL/minute; n = 5044), Stage 3B (eGFR 30-44 mL/minute; n = 2193), and Stage 4 or 5 (eGFR <30 mL/minute; n = 659). Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiac allograft failure, and freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant following heart transplant.

RESULTS

Simultaneous heart kidney transplant and HTA recipients differed in various baseline characteristics. Simultaneous heart kidney transplant recipients with eGFR <45 mL/minute had greater short- and long-term overall survival and cardiac allograft survival compared with HTA, as well as greater long-term freedom from chronic dialysis or renal transplant. These results were consistent with both propensity matched analyses and multivariable Cox regression analysis of 10 year outcomes. Optimal cutoff value for pretransplant eGFR in predicting elevated risk of renal failure in recipients of heart transplant alone was found to be eGFR ∼45 mL/minute.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to patients with eGFR <30 mL/minute, patients with eGFR 30 to 44 mL/minute who underwent simultaneous heart kidney transplant had superior outcomes compared with HTA, suggesting possible benefit of combined transplant strategy for this subset of heart transplant candidates.

Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis of Its Characteristics and Long-Term Variables

Patients with end-stage heart disease who undergo a heart transplant frequently have simultaneous kidney insufficiency, therefore simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is an option and it is necessary to understand its characteristics and long-term variables. The recipient characteristics and operative and long-term variables were assessed in a meta-analysis. A total of 781 studies were screened, and 33 were thoroughly reviewed. 15 retrospective cohort studies and 376 patients were included. The recipient's mean age was 51.1 years (95% CI 48.52-53.67) and 84% (95% CI 80-87) were male. 71% (95% CI 59-83) of the recipients were dialysis dependent. The most common indication was ischemic cardiomyopathy [47% (95% CI 41-53)] and cardiorenal syndrome [22% (95% CI 9-35)]. Also, 33% (95% CI 20-46) of the patients presented with delayed graft function. During the mean follow-up period of 67.49 months (95% CI 45.64-89.33), simultaneous rejection episodes of both organ allografts were described in 5 cases only. Overall survival was 95% (95% CI 88-100) at 30 days, 81% (95% CI 76-86) at 1 year, 79% (95% CI 71-87) at 3, and 71% (95% CI 59-83) at 5 years. Simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is an important option for concurrent cardiac and renal dysfunction and has acceptable rejection and survival rates.

Utility of a score-based approach to liver assessment in heart transplant candidates

Background

While abnormalities of liver function and imaging are common in patients with end-stage heart failure, advanced fibrosis is uncommon. Liver biopsy (LB) is used to identify advanced fibrosis in heart transplant (HT) candidates but can delay or limit access to definitive therapies and cause complications. We sought to develop and determine the utility of a clinical risk score for advanced fibrosis in HT candidates.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, single-center review of patients evaluated for HT between 2012 and 2019 (n = 1,651) and identified those who underwent LB (n = 137) as well as a matched control cohort (n = 160). Patients with congenital heart disease were excluded. All biopsies were reviewed by a liver pathologist. Univariate logistic modeling was used to identify factors predictive of advanced liver fibrosis. Simulation using synthetic data bootstraps was performed to determine the utility of using a score-based approach to trigger LB. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival.

Results

We identified 32 (23%) patients with stage 0, 79 (58%) with stage 1 to 2, and 26 (19%) with stage 3 to 4/advanced fibrosis. The factor most associated with pursuit of LB was abnormal liver parenchyma on ultrasound. We found that a score combining severe tricuspid regurgitation, alcohol use, and low-density lipoprotein improved specificity and reduced the number of LBs required. We found no difference in survival at 3 years post-HT based on pre-HT fibrosis stage.

Conclusions

A score composed of noninvasive factors may help reduce the number of patients who require LB for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis. Additional multicenter studies are needed to validate this score.

Combined Heart Kidney Transplantation Versus Heart Transplant in Patients with Renal Failure: Contemporary Insights and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we aim to outline the criteria regarding the evaluation of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD) awaiting heart transplantation and discuss the outcomes of combined heart/kidney transplantation. Herein, we also review pathophysiology and risk factors that predispose to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with HF and after OHT.

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with end-stage systolic heart failure (HF) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) alone is a relative contraindication, with a consensus that these patients are better served with heart-kidney transplant (HKT). However, there is significant variation between institutions regarding timing and indication for heart/kidney transplantation, with little data available to predict post-transplant outcomes. A Scientific Statement from American Heart Association was published detailing the indications, evaluation, and outcomes for Heart-Kidney Transplantation, and noted a steady rise in the incidence of heart/kidney dual organ transplants. Recently, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Multi-Organ Transplantation Committee implemented a safety net policy for heart transplant recipients who do need meet criteria for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant in 2023 but with a likely need for sequential kidney transplantation. Optimization of organ distribution and patient outcomes after cardiac transplantation requires appropriate recipient selection. This review also outlines the criteria regarding the evaluation of patients with CKD awaiting heart transplantation and outcomes of combined HKT.

Improved waitlist and comparable post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 heart allocation system

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical trends and the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on both waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation in the United States.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to compare adult patients before and after the allocation policy change. This study included 2 separate analyses evaluating the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the 2018 allocation system's risk-adjusted hazards for 1-year waitlist and post-transplant mortality.

RESULTS

The initial analysis investigating the waitlist outcomes included 1779 patients listed for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. Of these, 1075 patients (60.4%) were listed after the 2018 allocation policy change. After the policy change, the waitlist outcomes significantly improved with a shorter waitlist time, lower likelihood of de-listing, and higher likelihood of transplantation. In the subsequent analysis investigating the post-transplant outcomes, 1130 simultaneous heart-kidney transplant recipients were included, where 738 patients (65.3%) underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation after the policy change. The 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year post-transplant survival and complication rates were comparable before and after the policy change. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the 2018 allocation system positively impacted risk-adjusted 1-year waitlist mortality (sub-hazard ratio, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.51-0.85, P < .001), but it did not significantly impact risk-adjusted 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72-1.47, P = .876).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates increased rates of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation with a shorter waitlist time after the 2018 allocation policy change. Furthermore, there were improved waitlist outcomes and comparable early post-transplant survival after simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation under the 2018 allocation system.

Trends and Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney and Heart-Lung Transplantation Over the Past Two Decades

INTRODUCTION

Combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKTx) and combined heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) remain the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure with concomitant end-stage renal or lung failure. We sought to study trends and outcomes of HKTx and HLTx over the last two decades.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify all adult patients (aged >18 y) who underwent HKTx and HLTx between 2001 and 2021. Patients were divided into 5-y groups by the year of transplantation (2001-2006, 2007-2011, 2012-2016, and 2017-2021). Primary outcome was 1-y posttransplantation mortality. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 2301 HKTx and 567 HLTx patients were included. Between 2001 and 2021, HKTx volume increased from 25 to 344 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HKTx increased from 19 to 76 (P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HKTx improved from 86.7% in 2001-2006 to 89.0% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.005). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.62 (0.39-1.00, P = 0.048) compared with that for 2001-2006. Between 2001 and 2021, HLTx volume increased from 21 to 43 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HLTx increased from 12 to 20 (P = 0.047). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HLTx improved from 68.9% in 2001-2006 to 83.9% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.600). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.37 (0.21-0.67, P = 0.001) compared with that for 2001-2006.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last two decades, HKTx volume substantially increased and HLTx experienced resurgent growth. One-year survival persistently improved for both procedures, especially over the past 5 y.

High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation

Key Points

Simultaneous heart–kidney transplant is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure which are worse when compared with kidney transplant alone. The major causes of kidney graft failure in simultaneous heart–kidney transplant recipients were patient death and primary nonfunction of kidney graft.

Background

The indications and outcomes of simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation (SHKT) remain suboptimally defined. Risk factors for renal graft failure after SHKT also remain poorly defined.

Methods

We analyzed the renal graft outcomes among SHKT recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2015 to 2020. To evaluate for factors associated with poor renal outcomes, we compared SHKT and kidney transplantation alone recipients using propensity score matching.

Results

Among SHKT recipients, the rate of primary nonfunction (PNF) of kidney graft was 3%, the 30-day kidney graft failure rate was 7.0%, and the 30-day post-transplant mortality rate was 4.1%. The incidence of kidney delayed graft function was 27.5%. Kidney graft failure was seen early post-SHKT with most common causes of patient death (43.9%) and PNF of kidney graft (41.5%). One- and 2-year patient survival was 89.2% and 86.5%, and 1- and 2-year freedom from kidney graft failure was 85.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of SHKT recipients, use of pretransplant mechanical cardiac support (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.57; P = 0.017), higher calculated panel reactive antibody (aOR, 1.76; P = 0.016), and older donor age per 10 years (aOR, 1.94; P = 0.001) were associated with PNF. Pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with the increased risk of 30-day recipient mortality (aOR, 5.55; P = 0.002). Increased 30-day graft failure was seen in SHKT recipients with pretransplant mechanical cardiac support (aOR, 1.77; P = 0.038) and dialysis at the time of transplant (aOR, 1.72; P = 0.044). Multivariable Cox hazard analysis demonstrated that SHKT, when compared with kidney transplantation alone, is associated with increased kidney graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.56; P < 0.001) and recipient mortality (hazard ratio, 2.65; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SHKT is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure. Identification of risk factors of renal graft failure can help optimize recipient selection for SHKT versus kidney after heart transplantation, especially after introduction of the new safety-net policy.

Dual organ transplantation: when heart alone is not enough

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of dual organ transplantations (DOT) are steadily increasing over the past few years. This is both a reflection of increasing complexity and advanced disease process in the patients and greater transplant center experience with performing dual organ transplants. Due to lack of standardization of the process, there remains significant center-based variability in patient selection, perioperative and long-term management of these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall posttransplant outcomes for DOT have been acceptable with some immunological advantages because of partial tolerance offered by the second organ. These achievements should, however, be balanced with the ethical implications of bypassing the patients who are listed for single organ transplantation because of the preferential allocation of organs for DOT.

SUMMARY

The field of DOT is expanding rapidly, with good long-term outcomes. There is an urgent need for guidelines to standardize the process of patient selection and listing dual organ transplantation.

Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation?

Objective

This study assessed characteristics and outcomes of younger (18-65) versus older (>65) recipients of simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation with varying functional dependence.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 1398 patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received SHK between 2010 and 2021. Patients who were <18 year old, underwent transplant of additional organs simultaneously, or had previous heart transplant were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points included adverse events and cause of death. Outcomes were also evaluated by propensity score-matched comparison.

Results

The number of annual SHK transplantation in the United States has significantly increased among both age groups over the past 2 decades (P < .0001). After propensity score matching of recipients aged 18 to 65 years (n = 1162) versus age >65 years (n = 236), baseline characteristics were similar and well-balanced between the 2 cohorts. Between matched cohorts, older recipients did not have increased posttransplant mortality compared with younger recipients (90-day survival, P = .85; 7-year survival, P = .61). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039 [0.975-1.106], P = .2415) and pretransplant functional status with interaction term for age (some assistance, HR, 0.965 [0.902-1.033], P = .3079; total assistance, HR, 0.976 [0.914-1.041], P = .4610) were not significant risk factors for 7-year post-SHK transplantation mortality.

Conclusions

Older and more functionally dependent recipients in this study did not have increased post-SHK transplantation mortality. These findings have important implications for organ allocation among elderly patients, as they support the need for thorough assessment of SHK candidates in terms of comorbidities, rather than exclusion solely based on age and functional dependence.

Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant With Planned Delayed Implantation of the Kidney Graft After Ex Vivo Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) is an established option for patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Recent studies in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation demonstrate favorable outcomes achieved by delaying implantation of the kidney for over 24 h. This report describes a case series of consecutive patients listed for SHK who had planned delayed implantation of the kidney graft.

METHODS

This case series represents a retrospective analysis of SHK patients extracted from the transplant database at a single center.

RESULTS

There were 7 patients who underwent SHK during the study period. In all cases, kidney grafts were maintained on hypothermic ex vivo pulsatile perfusion for delayed implantation (mean cold ischemia 53 h [range, 31-69]). The first 5 patients had 100% 1-y heart and kidney graft survival with good function. Patient 6 was unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-heart transplant. The kidney was implanted at 69 h, and the patient died soon thereafter. Patient 7 was also unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplant. The decision was made to implant the kidney into a backup kidney recipient. The heart transplant recipient subsequently died several days later, whereas the kidney was successfully transplanted in the alternate candidate.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the potential utility of delayed kidney implantation in SHK patients. SHK with delayed renal transplant may provide an improved physiologic environment for renal transplant, which may result in improved early renal graft function. Delayed kidney transplant also provides the opportunity to transplant the kidney graft into an alternate candidate.

Use of extended criteria donor hearts in combined heart-kidney transplant confers greater risk of mortality

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donors (ECD) hearts have demonstrated acceptable outcomes in select populations. However, their use in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has not been explored. This study is assessed the effect of ECD hearts in patients undergoing SHKT vs isolated heart transplants (IHT).

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing IHT and SHKT. Patients were stratified by receipt of ECD heart, defined as donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Interaction effects between ECDs and simultaneous kidney transplants were generated. Postoperative outcomes, risk factors, and patient/graft survival were compared across cohorts using Fine-Gray, Kaplan Meier, and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses.

RESULTS

Among 26,207 patients included, 1,766 (7%) underwent SHKT. ECD hearts were used in 25% of both IHT and SHKT cohorts. Five-year survival among SHKT/ECD patients (67.3%) was reduced (p < 0.01) compared to SHKT/SDC (80.3%), IHT/ECD (78.1%) and IHT/SCD (80.0%) groups. Among SHKT patients, use of ECD hearts was associated with increased risk (SHR: 1.48; p < 0.01) of renal graft failure compared to SCD hearts. Among SHKT patients, receipt of an ECD heart, and individual ECD criteria (coronary disease and size mismatch >20%), predicted mortality. The interaction effect of receiving both ECD and SHKT predicted mortality and graft failure (HR 1.43; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing SHKT with an ECD heart face greater risks of mortality and graft failure in comparison to those undergoing IHT with ECD hearts. Careful selection of donor organs should be applied to this high-risk cohort.

Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients

Objectives

The upper limit of recipient age for combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcomes of HKT in patients aged ≥65 years.

Methods

The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify patients undergoing HKT from 2005 to 2021. Patients were stratified by age at transplantation: <65 and ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 5-year mortality, postoperative new-onset dialysis, postoperative stroke, acute rejection prior to discharge, and rejection within one-year of HKT. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk adjustment for mortality was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results

HKT in recipients aged ≥65 significantly increased from 5.6% of all recipients in 2005 to 23.7% in 2021 (p=0.002). Of 2,022 HKT patients in the study period, 372 (18.40%) were aged ≥65. Older recipients were more likely to be male and white, and fewer required dialysis prior to HKT. There were no differences between cohorts in unadjusted 90-day, 1-year, or 5-year survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis. These findings persisted after risk-adjustment, with an adjusted hazard for one-year mortality for age ≥65 of 0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), p=0.572). As a continuous variable, increasing age was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), p=0.236) per year). Patients aged ≥65 more frequently required new-onset dialysis prior to discharge (11.56% vs. 7.82%, p=0.051). Stroke and rejection rates were comparable.

Conclusion

Combined HKT is increasing in older recipients, and advanced age ≥65 should not preclude HKT.

Clinical trends, risk factors, and temporal effects of post-transplant dialysis on outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation in the 2018 United States heart allocation system

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the current clinical trends, risk factors, and temporal effects of post-transplant dialysis on outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation after the 2018 United States adult heart allocation policy change.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried to analyze adult orthotopic heart transplant recipients after the October 18, 2018 heart allocation policy change. The cohort was stratified according to the need for post-transplant de novo dialysis. The primary outcome was survival. Propensity score-matching was performed to compare the outcomes between 2 similar cohorts with and without post-transplant de novo dialysis. The impact of post-transplant dialysis chronicity was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for post-transplant dialysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7,223 patients were included in this study. Out of these, 968 patients (13.4%) developed post-transplant renal failure requiring de novo dialysis. Both 1-year (73.2% vs 94.8%) and 2-year (66.3% vs 90.6%) survival rates were lower in the dialysis cohort (p < 0.001), and the lower survival rates persisted in a propensity-matched comparison. Recipients requiring only temporary post-transplant dialysis had significantly improved 1-year (92.5% vs 71.6%) and 2-year (86.6 % vs 52.2%) survival rates compared to the chronic post-transplant dialysis group (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated low pretransplant estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) and bridge with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were strong predictors of post-transplant dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that post-transplant dialysis is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality in the new allocation system. Post-transplant survival is affected by the chronicity of post-transplant dialysis. Low pretransplant eGFR and ECMO are strong risk factors for post-transplant dialysis.

Recent Developments in the Evaluation and Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic entity associated with high morbidity and mortality among acutely ill heart failure (HF) patients with acute and/ or chronic kidney diseases (CKD). While traditionally viewed as a state of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) due to decreased renal perfusion, mainly due to therapeutic interventions to relieve congestive in HF, recent insights into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of CRS led to a broader definition and further classification of CRS into 5 distinct types. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the classification of CRS, highlighting the underlying common pathogenetic pathways of heart failure and kidney injury, including increased congestion, neurohormonal dysregulation, oxidative stress as well as inflammation, and cytokine storm that are particularly evident in COVID-19 patients with multiorgan failure and also in those with other disorders including sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus and amyloidosis. In this review we also present the recent advances in the diagnostic strategies of CRS including cardiac and renal biomarkers as well as advanced cardiac and renal imaging techniques that are available to aid in the diagnosis as well as in the prognostication of this disorder. Finally, we discuss the various therapeutic options available to-date, including fluid optimization, hemofiltration, renal replacement therapy as well as the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in light of recent data from RCTs. It is important to note that, CRS population are either excluded or underrepresented, at best, in major RCTs and therefore, therapeutic recommendations are largely extrapolated from HF and CKD clinical trials.

Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation has been increasingly performed in end-stage heart failure patients with concurrent kidney dysfunction despite limited evidence supporting its indications and utility.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and utility of simultaneously implanted kidney allografts with various degrees of kidney dysfunction during heart transplantation.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, long-term mortality was compared in recipients with kidney dysfunction who underwent heart-kidney transplantation (n = 1,124) vs isolated heart transplantation (n = 12,415) in the United States between 2005 and 2018. In heart-kidney recipients, contralateral kidney recipients were compared for allograft loss. Multivariable Cox regression was used for risk adjustment.

RESULTS

Long-term mortality was lower among heart-kidney recipients than among heart-alone recipients when recipients were on dialysis (26.7% vs 38.6% at 5 years; HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89) or had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (19.3% vs 32.4%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82) and GFR of 30 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m² (16.2% vs 24.3%; HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48-0.97) but not in GFR of 45 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Interaction analysis showed that the mortality benefit of heart-kidney transplantation continued up to GFR 40 mL/min/1.73 m². The incidence of kidney allograft loss was higher among heart-kidney recipients than among contralateral kidney recipients (14.7% vs 4.5% at 1 year; HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart-kidney transplantation relative to heart transplantation alone provided superior survival for dialysis-dependent recipients and non-dialysis-dependent recipients up to a GFR of approximately 40 mL/min/1.73 m² but at the cost of almost twice the risk of kidney allograft loss than contralateral kidney allograft recipients.

Donor hyperoxia is a novel risk factor for severe cardiac primary graft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early mortality following heart transplant (HT). Donor risk factors for the development of PGD are incompletely characterized. Donor management goals (DMG) are predefined critical care endpoints used to optimize donors. We evaluated the relationship between DMGs as well as non-DMG parameters, and the development of PGD after HT.

METHODS

A cohort of HT recipients from 2 transplant centers between 1/1/12 and 12/31/19 was linked to their respective donors in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) DMG Registry (n = 1,079). PGD was defined according to modified ISHLT criteria. Variables were subject to univariate and multivariable multinomial modeling with development of mild/moderate or severe PGD as the outcome variable. A second multicenter cohort of 4,010 donors from the DMG Registry was used for validation.

RESULTS

Mild/moderate and severe PGD occurred in 15% and 6% of the cohort. Multivariable modeling revealed 6 variables independently associated with mild/moderate and 6 associated with severe PGD, respectively. Recipient use of amiodarone plus beta-blocker, recipient mechanical circulatory support, donor age, donor fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), and donor creatinine increased risk whereas predicted heart mass ratio decreased risk of severe PGD. We found that donor age and FiO₂ ≥ 40% were associated with an increased risk of death within 90 days post-transplant in a multicenter cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor hyperoxia at heart recovery is a novel risk factor for severe primary graft dysfunction and early recipient death. These results suggest that excessive oxygen supplementation should be minimized during donor management.

Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant-Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?

High institutional transplant volume is associated with improved outcomes in isolated heart and kidney transplant. The aim of this study was to assess trends and outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHKT) nationally, as well as the impact of institutional heart and kidney transplant volume on survival. All adult patients who underwent SHKT between 2005-2019 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Annual institutional volumes in single organ transplant were determined. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the impact of demographics, comorbidities, and institutional transplant volumes on 1-year survival. 1564 SHKT were identified, increasing from 54 in 2005 to 221 in 2019. In centers performing SHKT, median annual heart transplant volume was 35.0 (IQR 24.0-56.0) and median annual kidney transplant volume was 166.0 (IQR 89.5-224.0). One-year survival was 88.4%. In multivariable analysis, increasing heart transplant volume, but not kidney transplant volume, was associated with improved 1-year survival. Increasing donor age, dialysis requirement, ischemic times, and bilirubin were also independently associated with reduced 1-year survival. Based on this data, high-volume heart transplant centers may be better equipped with managing SHKT patients than high-volume kidney transplant centers.

Managing Heart Failure in Patients on Dialysis: State-of-the-Art Review

Heart failure (HF) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) frequently coexist; 1 comorbidity worsens the prognosis of the other. HF is responsible for almost half the deaths of patients on dialysis. Despite patients' with ESKD composing an extremely high-risk population, they have been largely excluded from landmark clinical trials of HF, and there is, thus, a paucity of data regarding the management of HF in patients on dialysis, and most of the available evidence is observational. Likewise, in clinical practice, guideline-directed medical therapy for HF is often down-titrated or discontinued in patients with ESKD who are undergoing dialysis; this is due to concerns about safety and tolerability. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the available evidence for each of the foundational HF therapies in ESKD, review current challenges and barriers to managing patients with HF on dialysis, and outline future directions to optimize the management of HF in these high-risk patients.

Heart-kidney transplant versus heart transplant in the obese: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

The decision to perform simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (HKT) rather than isolated heart transplant (IHT) for patients with advanced kidney disease is challenging. Limited data exist to guide this decision in obese patients. We sought to compare mortality after HKT and IHT in obese patients with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing was queried for data on adult heart transplant recipients from 2000 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were obesity, estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 and no pretransplant dialysis. HKT and IHT recipients were propensity matched. Morbidity was compared using chi-squared, Fisher's exact and McNemar's tests. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimation. Risk factors for mortality were examined with Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 289 HKT and 1920 IHT recipients met inclusion criteria. Heart-kidney recipients had higher baseline creatinine and rates of intensive care unit disposition than IHT recipients (both standardized mean differences >0.10). Propensity matching resulted in 239 pairs of HKT and IHT recipients with minimal differences in baseline characteristics. Heart-kidney recipients had higher 5- and 10-year survival than IHT recipients on unmatched (77% vs 69%, P = 0.011 and 58% vs 48%, P = 0.008) and propensity matched analyses (77% vs 68%, P = 0.026 and 57% vs 39%, P = 0.007). Heart-kidney transplantation was protective against 10-year mortality on multivariable regression (hazard ratio 0.585, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients with non-dialysis-dependent kidney disease, HKT may decrease long-term mortality relative to IHT and should be strongly considered as a preferred treatment.

Heart-kidney listing is better than isolated heart listing for pediatric heart transplant candidates with significant renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVES

Significant renal insufficiency is identified as a risk factor for post-transplantation mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients. This study evaluates simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation listing outcomes compared with heart transplant for pediatric candidates with significant renal insufficiency.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was searched for patients (January 1987 to March 2020) who were simultaneously listed for a heart-kidney transplantation or for heart transplant with significant renal insufficiency at the time of listing. Significant renal insufficiency was defined as needing dialysis or having a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (<40 mL/min). Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 427 cases were identified; 109 were listed for heart-kidney transplantation, and 318 were listed for heart transplant alone. Median time on the waitlist was 101 days (interquartile range, 28-238) for heart-kidney transplantation listings compared with 39 days (14-86) and 23.5 days (6-51) for heart transplant recipients with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = .002) or on dialysis (P < .001), respectively. Of all heart-kidney transplantation listings, 66% (n = 71) received a transplant compared with 54% (n = 173) of heart transplantation with significant renal insufficiency (P = .005) with a mean survival of 14.6 years (12.7-16.4 years) for heart transplant without significant renal insufficiency at transplantation and 7.6 years (5.4-9.9 years) for heart transplant with significant renal insufficiency at transplantation. At 1 year after listing, 69% of heart-kidney transplantation listed recipients were alive, compared with 51% of heart transplant listed recipients (P = .029). Heart-kidney transplantation recipients had better 1-year post-transplantation survival (86%) than heart transplantation with significant renal insufficiency at transplant (66%) (P = .001). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year survivals of those undergoing heart transplantation listed with significant renal insufficiency but no significant renal insufficiency at the time of transplant (89% and 78%) and heart-kidney transplantation recipients (86% and 81%; P = .436).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric candidates with significant renal insufficiency listed for heart-kidney transplantation have superior waitlist and post-transplantation outcomes compared with those listed for heart transplant alone. Patients with significant renal insufficiency should be listed for heart-kidney transplantation, however; if their renal function improves significantly, heart transplant alone appears judicious.

Severely Reduced Kidney Function Assessed by a Single eGFR Determination at the Time of an Isolated Heart Transplant Does Not Predict Inevitable Posttransplant ESKD

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines advise simultaneous heart kidney transplantation (SHK) in heart candidates with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . We hypothesize that a significant fraction of such patients would not need an SHK, even though a graded increase in mortality and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) would be seen with decrements in eGFR.

METHODS

United Network of Organ Sharing data for isolated heart transplants between 2000 and 2020 were divided into two groups based on eGFR at transplant (≤20 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and 21-29 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcome was ESKD posttransplant. Cox regression and cumulative incidence competing risk methods were used to compare risk of mortality and ESKD.

RESULTS

There was no difference in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.82 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.60-1.11, P = 0.21]) or ESKD (aHR 1.01 [95% CI: 0.49-2.09, P = 0.96]) between the two groups (≤20 versus 21-29). The overall incidence of ESKD for the entire cohort at 1, 5, and 10 y were 1.5%, 9.5%, and 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although risk of ESKD is highest in heart candidates with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , <10% of patients reach ESKD within 5 y' and most will recover significant renal function posttransplant. More refined selection criteria are required to identify candidates for SHK.

Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Controversies

Renal dysfunction, a prevalent comorbidity in advanced heart failure, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. In the recent era, the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation has experienced great success in the treatment of both renal and cardiac dysfunction in end-stage disease states, and the number of transplants has increased dramatically. In this review, we discuss appropriate indications and selection criteria, overall and organ-specific outcomes, and future perspectives in the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation.

Overcoming challenges in patient selection and monitoring in combined heart and kidney transplantation

Combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) is a growing therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although patients with advanced HF and need for chronic haemodialysis have a clear indication for combined HKT, challenges to current practice lie in identifying those patients with severely depressed kidney function, which will not recover kidney function after restoration of appropriate haemodynamic conditions following heart transplantation (HT) alone. Because of the paucity of available organs, maximisation of kidney graft utility whilst minimising the operative risks associated with combined transplantation is mandatory. The benefits of HKT go beyond the mere restoration of kidney function. Data from registry analysis show that HKT improves overall survival in patients with CKD, as compared to heart transplant only, and it is associated with reduced incidence of heart allograft rejection, likely through the promotion of host immune tolerance mechanisms. In patients not requiring chronic dialysis, kidney-after-heart strategy may be explored, instead of combined HKT, in particular when the aetiology of CKD is unclear. This indeed allows for monitoring and gaging of indications for combined transplantation in the postoperative period. This approach however should be matched with priority listing for kidney transplantation given the high waitlist mortality in heart transplant recipients with associated CKD. The use of kidney machine perfusion may represent an additional tool to optimise the outcome of HKT, allowing more time to stabilise the patient after HT surgery.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Initial Clinical Experience

Introduction

Combined solid organ transplantation is infrequently performed in Brazil. The objective of this article is to present our initial experience with combined heart and kidney transplantation.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2019, four patients were submitted to combined heart and kidney transplantation. Their mean age was 55.7±4.4 years, and three (75%) patients were males. All patients had Chagas cardiomyopathy, two were hospitalized and inotrope dependent, and all patients were on preoperative dialysis (median of 12 months prior to transplant).

Results

All patients survived and were in New York Heart Association functional class I at the latest follow-up (mean 34.7±17.5 months). Mean retarded kidney graft function was 22.9±9.7 days. One patient lost the kidney graft two years after the transplant due to Polyomavirus infection.

Conclusion

Our initial experience of combined heart and kidney transplantation was favorable in selected patients with advanced heart failure and end-stage kidney disease. It requires involvement of a dedicated multispecialty team throughout all the diagnostics and treatment steps.

Optimal patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplant: A modified cost-effectiveness analysis

Increasing rates of simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplant in the United States exacerbate the overall shortage of deceased donor kidneys (DDK). Current allocation policy does not impose constraints on SHK eligibility, and how best to do so remains unknown. We apply a decision-analytic model to evaluate options for heart transplant (HT) candidates with comorbid kidney dysfunction. We compare SHK with a "Safety Net" strategy, in which DDK transplant is performed 6 months after HT, only if native kidneys do not recover. We identify patient subsets for whom SHK using a DDK is efficient, considering the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains from DDKs instead allocated for kidney transplant-only. For an average-aged candidate with a 50% probability of kidney recovery after HT-only, SHK produces 0.64 more QALYs than Safety Net at a cost of 0.58 more kidneys used. SHK is inefficient in this scenario, producing fewer QALYs per DDK used (1.1) than a DDK allocated for KT-only (2.2). SHK is preferred to Safety Net only for candidates with a lower probability of native kidney recovery (24%-38%, varying by recipient age). This finding favors the implementation of a Safety Net provision and should inform the establishment of objective criteria for SHK transplant eligibility.

Simultaneous pediatric heart-kidney transplant outcomes in the US: A-25 year National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric sHKTx remains uncommon in the US. We examined outcomes of pediatric sHKTx compared to PHTx alone. Our objective was to identify a threshold eGFR that justified pediatric sHKTx.

METHODS

Data from the SRTR heart and kidney databases were used to identify 9245 PHTx, and 63 pediatric sHKTx performed between 1992 and 2017 (age ≤21 years).

RESULTS

The median age for sHKTx was 16 years, and included 31 males (31/63 = 49%). Over half of sHKTx (36/63 = 57%) were performed in cases where pretransplant dialysis was initiated. Among patients who required pretransplant dialysis, the risk of death in sHKTx recipients was significantly lower than PHTx alone (sHKTx vs. PHTx: HR 0.4, 95% CI [0.2, 0.9], p = .01). In those without pretransplant dialysis, there was no improvement in survival between sHKTx and PHTx (p = .2). When stratified by eGFR, PHTx alone recipients had worse survival than sHKTx in the group with eGFR ≤35 ml/min/1.73 m² (p = .04). The 1- and 5-year actuarial survival rates in pediatric sHKTx recipients were 87% and 81.5% respectively and was similar to isolated PHTx (p = .5). One-year rates of treated heart (11%) and kidney (7.9%) rejection were similar in sHKTx compared to PHTx alone (p = .7) and pediatric kidney transplant alone (p = .5) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric sHKTx should be considered in HTx candidates with kidney failure requiring dialysis or eGFR ≤35 ml/min/1.73 m² . The utility of sHKTx in cases of kidney failure not requiring dialysis warrants further study.

Current State of Multiorgan Transplantation and Implications for Future Practice and Policy

The incidence of kidney dysfunction has increased in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates, reflecting a changing patient population and allocation policies that prioritize the most urgent candidates. A higher burden of pretransplant kidney dysfunction has resulted in a substantial rise in the utilization of multiorgan transplantation (MOT). Owing to a shortage of available deceased donor kidneys, the increased use of MOT has the potential to disadvantage kidney-alone transplant candidates, as current allocation policies generally provide priority for MOT candidates above all kidney-alone transplant candidates. In this review, the implications of kidney disease in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates is reviewed, and current policies used to allocate organs are discussed. Important ethical considerations pertaining to MOT allocation are examined, and future policy modifications that may improve both equity and utility in MOT policy are considered.

Clinical Factors Associated with Renal Outcome After Heart Transplantation

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) frequently occurs in end-stage heart failure patients waiting for heart transplantation (HT). Decision-making regarding simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is an unresolved issue in these patients. We investigated clinical factors associated with renal outcome after HT. A total of 180 patients who received HT from 1996 to 2015 were included. Factors associated with early post-HT chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m² within 1 year post-HT), post-HT end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and significant renal function improvement (%ΔeGFR > 15%) at 1 year post-HT were analyzed. Early post-HT CKD and post-HT ESKD developed in 61 (33.9%) and 8 (4.4%) of 180 patients, respectively. Old age was only independently associated with early post-HT CKD and preexisting CKD tended to be associated with early post-HT CKD. Old age and preexisting CKD were independently associated with post-HT ESKD. Low pre-HT eGFR and preoperative renal replacement therapy were not associated with early post-HT CKD or post-HT ESKD. Young age, low pre-HT eGFR, and high %ΔeGFR 1 month post-HT were independently associated with significant renal function improvement. Preoperative renal function, including preoperative RRT, was not associated with post-HT mortality. In conclusion, preexisting CKD may impact renal outcomes after HT, but preoperative severe renal dysfunction, even that severe enough to require RRT, may not be a contraindication for HT alone. Our data suggest the necessity of early HT in end-stage heart failure patients with CRS and the importance of careful management during the early postoperative period.

Outcomes of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Heart transplantation in the setting of renal insufficiency is controversial. The objective of this study was to perform a descriptive analysis of patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) due to acute kidney injury (AKI).

DESIGN

An observational cohort study with retrospective data collection.

SETTING

A tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-one patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation with cardiogenic shock under inotrope dependence, with nine patients having preoperative RRT and 42 patients not having preoperative RRT.

INTERVENTIONS

There were no interventions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hospital mortality occurred in eight (15.6%) patients. Although there were no significant differences between the study groups (preoperative RRT 33.3% v controls 11.9%, p = 0.1), this study was underpowered to detect differences in mortality. Dialysis also was required in 52.4% of patients who were not on preoperative RRT. All survivors had full recovery of kidney function with similar timing after transplant (18.5 days v 15 days, p = 0.75). Actuarial survival was 82.4%, 76.5%, and 66.5% at six months, one year, and five years, respectively. A cold ischemic time greater than 180 minutes (hazard ratio [HR] 4.37 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-12.6; p = 0.006) and pretransplant RRT (HR = 7.19 95% CI 1.13-45.7; p = 0.04) were independent predictors of long-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In a health system with limited funding and availability of mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation in the setting of AKI, RRT, and low Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile was associated with important hospital mortality. Among hospital survivors, however, all patients had full renal recovery and by 25 months there was no difference in mortality between those who required preoperative RRT and those who did not.

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation results in respectable long-term outcome but a high rate of early kidney graft loss in high-risk recipients - a European single center analysis

BACKGROUND

In spite of renal graft shortage and increasing waiting times for transplant candidates, simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) is an increasingly performed procedure established for patients with combined end-stage cardiac and renal failure. Although data on renal graft outcome in this setting is limited, reports on reduced graft survival in comparison to solitary kidney transplantation (KTx) have led to an ongoing discussion of adequate organ utilization.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate prognostic factors and outcomes of 27 patients undergoing HKTx in comparison to a matched cohort of 27 patients undergoing solitary KTx between September 1987 and October 2019 in one of Europe's largest transplant centers.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 100.33 (0.46-362.09) months. Despite lower five-year kidney graft survival (62.6% versus 92.1%; 111.73 versus 183.08 months; p = 0.189), graft function and patient survival (138.90 versus 192.71 months; p = 0.128) were not significantly inferior after HKTx in general. However, in case of prior cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy we observed significantly reduced early graft and patient survival (57.00 and 94.09 months, respectively) when compared to patients undergoing solitary KTx (183.08 and 192.71 months; p < 0.001, respectively) or HKTx without prior cardiac surgery (203.22 and 203.22 months; p = 0.016 and p = 0.019, respectively), most probably explained by the significantly increased rate of primary nonfunction (33.3%) and in-hospital mortality (25.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrates the increased rate of early kidney graft loss and thus significantly inferior graft survival in high-risk patients undergoing HKTx. Thus, we advocate for a "kidney-after-heart" program in such patients to ensure responsible and reasonable utilization of scarce resources in times of ongoing organ shortage crisis.

Need for improvements in simultaneous heart-kidney allocation: The limitation of pretransplant glomerular filtration rate

The incidence of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) has increased markedly in the last 15 years. There are no universally agreed upon indications for SHK vs. heart alone (HA) transplant, and center evaluation processes vary widely. We utilized Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2003 to 2017 to quantify changes in the practice of SHK, examine the survival of SHK vs. HA, and identify patients with marginal benefit from SHK. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards to assess differences in survival. The incidence of SHK increased more than fourfold between 2003 and 2017 from 1.6% to 6.6% of total hearts transplanted, while the proportion of dialysis-dependent patients undergoing SHK has remained constant. SHK was associated with increased survival in dialysis-dependent patients (Median Survival SHK: 12.6 vs. HA: 7.1 years p < .0001) but not with nondialysis-dependent patients (Median Survival SHK: 12.5 vs. HA 12.3, p = .24). The marginal effect of SHK in decreasing the hazard of death diminished with increasing eGFR. Delayed graft function occurred in 26% of SHK recipients. Posttransplant chronic dialysis was similar for both operations (6.4% of HA and 6.0% of SHK). Further study is needed to define patients who benefit from SHK.

Impact of preoperative renal replacement therapy on the clinical outcome of heart transplant patients

Renal dysfunction is considered as a relative contraindication for heart transplantation (HTx). However, in the real world setting, many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) experience worsening of renal function and some even require renal replacement therapy (RRT) by the time they undergo HTx. We aimed to investigate the prognosis and clinical outcomes of HTx patients who required RRT during the perioperative period. The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) is a nationwide organ transplant registry in Korea. A total of 501 HTx patients had been prospectively enrolled in the KOTRY registry during 2014–2018. Among the 501 patients, 13 underwent combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx). The 488 patients who underwent isolated HTx were grouped according to their pre- and postoperative RRT status. The primary outcome was progression to dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after HTx. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality after HTx. The median follow-up was 22 months (9–39 months). Patients who needed preoperative RRT but were free from postoperative RRT showed comparable overall survival and renal outcome to patients who were free from both pre- and postoperative RRT. In multivariable analysis, preoperative RRT was not associated with progression to ESRD or all-cause mortality after HTx; however, postoperative RRT was a significant predictor for both progression to ESRD and all-cause mortality after HTx. Preoperative creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were not predictive of progression to ESRD after HTx. The present analysis suggests that preoperative RRT requirement does not indicate irreversible renal dysfunction in patients waiting for HTx. However, postoperative RRT was associated with progression to ESRD and mortality after HTx.

The impact of multi-organ transplant allocation priority on waitlisted kidney transplant candidates

Kidney-alone transplant (KAT) candidates may be disadvantaged by the allocation priority given to multi-organ transplant (MOT) candidates. This study identified potential KAT candidates not receiving a given kidney offer due to its allocation for MOT. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) database, we identified deceased donors from 2002 to 2017 who had one kidney allocated for MOT and the other kidney allocated for KAT or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) (n = 7,378). Potential transplant recipient data were used to identify the "next-sequential KAT candidate" who would have received a given kidney offer had it not been allocated to a higher prioritized MOT candidate. In this analysis, next-sequential KAT candidates were younger (p < .001), more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities (p < .001), and more highly sensitized than MOT recipients (p < .001). A total of 2,113 (28.6%) next-sequential KAT candidates subsequently either died or were removed from the waiting list without receiving a transplant. In a multivariable model, despite adjacent position on the kidney match-run, mortality risk was significantly higher for next-sequential KAT candidates compared to KAT/SPK recipients (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.44, 1.66). These results highlight implications of MOT allocation prioritization, and potential consequences to KAT candidates prioritized below MOT candidates.

Impact of changing renal function, while waiting for a heart transplant, on post-transplant mortality and development of end stage kidney disease

Heart transplantation is a viable option for end stage heart disease but long-term complications such as chronic kidney disease are being increasingly recognized. We sought to investigate the effect of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during the heart transplant waitlist period on post-transplant mortality and end stage kidney disease (ESKD). We analysed the United Network of Organ Sharing heart transplant database from 2000 to 2017. Multivariable Cox regression with restricted cubic splines and cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) methods were used to compare the effects of change in eGFR on mortality and ESKD, respectively. A total of 19 412 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mortality increased with increasing loss of eGFR (adjusted hazard ratio increased from 1.02 [confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.04, P = 0.008] for 10% loss to 1.15 (CI 1.06-1.26, P = 0.001) for 50% loss of eGFR. Similarly, risk of ESKD also increased monotonically with increasing loss of renal function [subdistribution hazard ratio increased from 1.12 (CI 1.09-1.14, P < 0.001) to 2.0 (CI 1.74-2.3, P < 0.001)] as loss of eGFR increased from 10% to 50%. Overall, we found that loss of >10% of eGFR resulted in higher risk of mortality and higher risk of ESKD.

Impact of diabetes and chronic dialysis on post-transplant survival in combined heart-kidney transplant recipients

Growing research supports an increased survival benefit of combined heart and kidney transplantation in patients with both heart and renal failure. As a result, the frequency of these combined transplants continues to increase. Despite this trend, little has been done to quantify the impact of chronic illness in this population. We identified adult recipients of combined heart-kidney transplant from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database between 2005 and 2018. We focused on renal disease secondary to diabetes and duration of dialysis as markers of chronic illness. The primary outcome was post-transplant mortality. Our final multivariable Cox proportional hazard model found that diabetes-associated renal disease (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14-2.15, p = .01) and dialysis duration (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15, p = .02) were significant predictors of post-transplant mortality. Given the significant impact of dialysis duration and renal disease secondary to diabetes mellitus, these chronically ill patients should be closely examined for conditions such as peripheral vascular disease and frailty, which have been shown to affect mortality in heart transplant recipients and are prevalent in the chronic dialysis population.

Changes in multiorgan heart transplants following the 2018 allocation policy change

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the impact of the heart allocation policy change in 2018 on the characteristics and outcomes of multiorgan transplants involving heart allografts.

METHODS

Adults undergoing multiorgan heart transplantation from 2010 to 2020 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. Transplants were stratified into occurring before versus after the October 2018 heart allocation change. The primary outcome was 1-year survival following transplantation. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the risk-adjusted effect of the allocation policy change on outcomes between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1832 patients underwent multiorgan heart transplantation during the study period with 245 (13.37%) undergoing heart-lung transplantation, 244 (13.32%) undergoing heart-liver transplantation, and 1343 (73.31%) undergoing heart-kidney transplantation. There was a higher utilization of temporary MCSDs as well as longer ischemic times for all three types of transplantation following the policy change. Heart-lung and heart-liver recipients had a similar 1-year survival before and after the policy change (each p > .05). Renal failure requiring dialysis (29.5% vs. 39.4%, p = .001) as well as 1-year survival (88% vs. 82%; log-rank p = .01) were worse in the heart-kidney cohort after the organ allocation system modification.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates similar trends in multiorgan transplants as has been observed in isolated heart transplants following the allocation change, including more frequent utilization of temporary mechanical support and longer ischemic times. Although outcomes have remained comparable in the new allocation era with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants, heart-kidney recipients have a worse 1-year survival following the change.

Trends in Renal Function Among Heart Transplant Recipients of Donor-Derived Hepatitis C Virus

Donor-derived hepatitis C (dd-HCV) infection may increase the risk of renal impairment (RI) among heart transplantation (HT) recipients. Sofosbuvir, an integral component of HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has also been linked to RI. To date, no study has examined the trends in renal function for HT recipients of dd-HCV infection and assessed safety and efficacy of Sofosbuvir-based DAAs. Between September 2016 and June 2018, 46 HCV-naive patients and one patient with a history of HCV treated pretransplant, underwent HT from HCV-positive donors (follow-up available through October 10, 2018). Patients were treated with Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (genotype 1) or Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir (genotype 3) for 12 or 24 weeks; no dose adjustments were made for renal function. Data on renal function were available for 23 patients who achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the treatment (SVR12; cohort A) and 18 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up (cohort B). Treatment of dd-HCV infection was initiated at a median of 6 weeks post-HT. In both cohorts, a nonsignificant reduction in median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ml/min/1.73 m) was noted (cohort A: pretransplant eGFR: 62 [interquartile range {IQR}: 1-84] to SVR12 eGFR: 49 [IQR: 37-82]; p = 0.43; cohort B: pretransplant eGFR: 65 [IQR: 54-84] to 1 year post-HT eGFR: 56 [IQR: 39-75]; p = 0.29). Pretreatment renal function had no significant impact on changes in renal function during treatment. All patients tolerated DAAs well with 100% completion rate to the assigned therapy and duration and 100% success at achieving SVR12. In this first and largest reported case series to date of HT recipients with dd-HCV infection, we observed that neither the dd-HCV infection nor its treatment with Sofosbuvir-based DAAs increased the risk of RI. Sofosbuvir-based DAAs appear safe, tolerable, and effective for HCV treatment even in presence of severe RI.

Early Outcomes of Multivisceral Transplant Using Hepatitis C-Positive Donors

BACKGROUND

In the era of direct-acting antiviral therapies, hepatitis C-positive organs offer a strategy to expand the donor pool. Heart failure patients with concomitant renal insufficiency benefit from combined heart/kidney transplant. In 2017, we began utilizing organs from hepatitis C donors for heart/kidney transplants.

METHODS

Characteristics and outcomes of heart/kidney transplants were collected at our institution from 2012 through 2019. We determined patient cohorts by donor hepatitis C antibody status, antibody positive (HCV+) vs antibody negative (HCV-). Outcomes of interest include survival, postoperative allograft function, and waitlist time. Summary and descriptive statistics, as well as survival analyses, were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent heart/kidney transplantation from 2012-2019. Twelve patients received HCV+ organs, and 27 patients received HCV- organs with minimal differences in donor and recipient cohort characteristics. Recipients who consented to receive HCV+ organs had a shorter median waitlist time. HCV+ and HCV- groups had similar perioperative and early postoperative cardiac function and similar rates of delayed renal graft function. HCV+ recipients demonstrated higher creatinine levels at 3 months posttransplant compared with HCV- recipients, but by 1-year post-transplant, creatinine levels in both groups were similar. The groups had similar 30-day and 1-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is a single-center series of heart/kidney transplant using HCV+ donors. When the potential increased risk of early postoperative renal dysfunction is balanced against similar survival and decreased waitlist time, the results suggest that HCV+ donors are an important source of transplantable organs for heart/kidney transplantation.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement on Heart Transplantation: Patient Eligibility, Selection, and Post-Transplantation Care

Significant practice-changing developments have occurred in the care of heart transplantation candidates and recipients over the past decade. This Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement provides evidence-based, expert panel recommendations with values and preferences, and practical tips on: (1) patient selection criteria; (2) selected patient populations; and (3) post transplantation surveillance. The recommendations were developed through systematic review of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The evolving areas of importance addressed include transplant recipient age, frailty assessment, pulmonary hypertension evaluation, cannabis use, combined heart and other solid organ transplantation, adult congenital heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis, high sensitization, and post-transplantation management of antibodies to human leukocyte antigen, rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and long-term noncardiac care. Attention is also given to Canadian-specific management strategies including the prioritization of highly sensitized transplant candidates (status 4S) and heart organ allocation algorithms. The focus topics in this position statement highlight the increased complexity of patients who undergo evaluation for heart transplantation as well as improved patient selection, and advances in post-transplantation management and surveillance that have led to better long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients.

Outcomes of Older Patients in the Recent Era of Heart Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Variable age thresholds are often used at transplant centers for simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (HKT). We hypothesize that selected older recipients enjoy comparable outcome to younger recipients in the current era of HKT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of HKT outcomes in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry from 2006 to 2018, classifying patients by age at transplant as ≥ 65 or < 65 years. The primary outcome was patient death. Secondary outcomes included all-cause kidney graft failure and death-censored kidney allograft failure.

RESULTS

Of 973 patients, 774 (80%) were younger than 65 years (mean 52 ± 10 years) and 199 (20%) were 65 years or older (mean 67 ± 2 years). The older HKT cohort had fewer blacks (22% vs 35%, P = .01) and women (12 vs 18%, P = .04). Fewer older patients received dialysis (30% vs 54%, P < .001) and mechanical support (36% vs 45%, P = .03) before HKT. Older recipients received organs from slightly older donors. The median follow-up time was shorter for patients 65 years or older than for the younger group (2.3 vs 3.3 years, P < .001). Patient survival was similar between the groups (mean 8.8 vs 9.8 years, P = .3), with the most common causes of death being cardiovascular (29%) and infectious complications (28%). There was no difference in all-cause kidney graft survival (mean 8.7 vs 9.3 years, P = .8). Most commonly, recipients died with a functional renal allograft (59.8%), and this occurred more commonly in older patients (81.4% vs 54.8%, P = .001). Cox proportional hazard modeling showed that higher donor age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.015, P = .01; HR 1.022, P = .02) and use of pre-transplant dialysis (HR 1.5, P = .004; HR 1.8, P = .006) increased the risk for both all-cause and death-censored kidney allograft failure, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that carefully selected older patients have outcomes similar to those of a younger cohort and argues for comprehensive evaluation of the recipients with age as part of comorbidity assessment rather than use of an arbitrary age threshold for candidacy.

Heart and kidney transplant: should they be combined or subsequent?

AIMS

End-stage heart failure patients often present with severe kidney failure and have limited treatment options. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes among end-stage heart and kidney failure patients who underwent combined heart and kidney transplant (HKTx) with those who underwent kidney transplant after heart transplant (KAH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients from 2007-2016 who underwent combined HKTx (n = 715) and those who underwent KAH (n = 130) using the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models compared survivals and identified predictors of death. Number of combined HKTx performed annually in United States increased from 59 in 2007 to 146 in 2016 whereas KAH decreased from 34 in 2007 to 6 in 2016. Among KAH patients, average wait time for kidney transplant was 3.0 years, time to dialysis or to kidney transplant after heart transplant did not differ with varying severity of kidney disease at baseline (P for both >0.05). Upon follow-up (mean 3.5 ± 2.7 years), 151 patients died. In multivariable models, patients who underwent combined HKTx had 4.7-fold greater risk of death [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-9.4) than KAH patients upon follow up. A secondary analysis using calculation of survival only after kidney transplant for KAH patients still conferred higher risk for combined HKTx patients [hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 95% CI 1.33-5.15]. In subgroup analyses after excluding patients on dialysis (HR 3.99 95% CI 1.98-8.04) and analysis after propensity matching for age, gender, and glomerular filtration rate (HR 3.01 95% CI 1.40-6.43) showed similar and significantly higher risk for combined HKTx patients compared with KAH patients. Lastly, these results also remained unchanged after excluding transplant centres who performed only one type of procedure preferentially, i.e. HKTx or KAH (HR 4.70 95% CI 2.35-9.42).

CONCLUSIONS

National registry data show continual increase in combined HKTx performed annually in the United States but inferior survival compared with KAH patients. Differences in patient characteristics or level of kidney dysfunction at baseline do not explain these poor outcomes among HKTx patients compared with KAH patients. Consensus guidelines are greatly needed to identify patients who may benefit more from dual organ transplants.

To kidney or not to kidney: Applying lessons learned from the simultaneous liver-kidney transplant policy to simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation

As the medical community is increasingly offering transplantation to patients with increasing comorbidity burdens, the number of simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplants is rising in the United States. How to determine eligibility for SHK transplant versus heart transplant alone is unknown. In this review, we situate this problem in the broader picture of organ shortage. We critically appraise available literature on outcomes in SHK versus heart transplant alone. We posit staged kidney-after-heart transplantation as a plausible alternative to SHK transplantation and review the pros and cons. Drawing lessons from the field of simultaneous liver-kidney transplant, we argue for an analogous policy for SHK transplant with standardized minimal eligibility criteria and a modified Safety Net provision. The new policy will serve as a starting point for comparing simultaneous versus staged approaches and refining the medical eligibility criteria for SHK.