Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one-year results of Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial

Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) exhibits increased bioavailability versus immediate-release (IR-TAC) and prolonged release (PR-TAC) tacrolimus. Improvements in tremor were previously reported in a limited number of kidney transplant patients who switched to LCPT. We conducted a non-interventional, non-randomized, uncontrolled, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study to assess the impact of switching to LCPT on tremor and quality of life (QoL) in a larger population of stable kidney transplant patients. The primary endpoint was change in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score; secondary endpoints included 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores, tacrolimus trough concentrations, neurologic symptoms, and safety assessments. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess change in TETRAS score and tacrolimus trough concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio by prior tacrolimus formulation and tacrolimus metabolizer status. Among 221 patients, the mean decrease of TETRAS score after switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). There was no statistically significant difference in change in TETRAS score after switch to LCPT between patients who had received IR-TAC and those who had received PR-TAC before switch, or between fast and slow metabolizers of tacrolimus. The overall increase of C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and from baseline to either M1 or M3 (both p < 0.0001) in the mITT population and in all subgroups. In the fast metabolizers group, the C0/D ratio crossed over the threshold of 1.05 ng/mL/mg after the switch to LCPT. Other neurologic symptoms tended to improve, and the SF-12 mental component summary score improved significantly. No new safety concerns were evident. In this observational study, all patients had a significant improvement of tremor, QoL and C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT irrespective of the previous tacrolimus formulation administered (IR-TAC or PR-TAC) and irrespective from their metabolism status (fast or slow metabolizers).

Three-year outcomes of de novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. We compared long-term efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients.

METHODS

25 prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 3 years following transplant was compared between groups using non-inferiority analysis.

RESULTS

LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 16% (90%CI, -37%, -1%, non-inferiority p = 0.002) up to 3 years following heart transplant. Up to 3-years post-transplant, 14 patients remained on once-daily LCPT and 10 patients were switched to IR-tacrolimus due to lack of insurance coverage. There were no significant differences in the rate of chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, cytomegalovirus requiring treatment, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and malignancy within 3 years following transplant.

CONCLUSION

LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus in heart transplantation with a similar safety profile. Narrowly-constrained FDA labels specific to kidney transplant remain a barrier to consistent access to many immunosuppressant medications for recipients of non-kidney solid organs. We recommend the FDA consider developing facile pathways for expanding the approved label of extended-release tacrolimus formulations to heart transplant recipients.

Pharmacokinetics of Envarsus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients - phase 1 pilot conversion study

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is the standard immunosuppressant for pediatric kidney transplants and is routinely administered twice daily (BD-tac). Envarsus (LCP-tac), an extended-release formulation, is approved for adults but not for pediatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot open-label phase 1 study in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age < 18 at the time of study). Our primary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics (Pk) of LCP-tac versus BD-tac. We conducted two 24-h Pk studies: pre-conversion (BD-tac) and 4 weeks post-conversion to LCP-tac. Patients were followed for 6 months, with the option to continue LCP-tac.

RESULTS

Five patients completed the study, with no returns to BD-tac. Median age was 15 years (range 11-17). LCP-tac exhibited an extended-release profile versus the bimodal profile of BD-tac. Time to maximum concentration was delayed (5 h vs. 1 h), and maximum concentration was lower (9.9 ng/mL vs. 14.4 ng/mL). Tacrolimus area under the curve (24 h) was comparable (141 ± 46.5 ng/mL vs. 164 ± 27.8 ng/mL). No new safety concerns arose. There were no rejection and no difference in eGFR at the study's end (1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , range - 1.7 to 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Concentration/dose ratio was higher in LCP-tac (1.8 ± 0.64 vs. 0.8 ± 0.39). The final conversion ratio was 0.6 (BD-tac: LCP-tac).

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study confirms the extended-release Pk profile and improved absorption of LCP-tac compared to BD-tac. A larger study is needed to further evaluate the population Pk characteristics in children.

Early outcomes associated with de novo once-daily extended-release versus twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus in a predominantly African American kidney transplant population: A single-center observational study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare early outcomes of de novo LCPT (once-daily extended-release tacrolimus) to IR TAC (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus) in a predominantly African American (AA) adult kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This is a single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two cohorts: IR TAC (administered between January 1, 2017, and January 31, 2019) and LCPT (administered between February 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020). Primary endpoints were changes in tacrolimus trough levels (ng/mL) and estimated glomerular filtration rate up to 12 months post-transplantation. Clinical endpoints included graft survival, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven rejection, CMV viremia, and BK. A propensity score weighted generalized linear mixed effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of change in tacrolimus levels was significantly higher in the LCPT cohort compared to the IR TAC cohort at 14 days post-discharge (.2455 ng/mL per day vs. .1073 ng/mL, respectively; p < .001). Subsequently, the LCPT cohort had a slightly higher rate of decline (-.015 ng/mL per day vs. -.010 ng/mL with IR TAC; p = .0894) up to 12 months post-discharge. Although eGFR was similar between the two cohorts at 12 months post-transplant, the rate of increase was slower in the LCPT cohort (.1371 mL/min per day vs. .1852 mL/min per day, p = .0314). No significant differences were found in graft survival, DGF, BPAR, CMV, or BK infection.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that despite higher early trough levels with immediate post-transplant LCPT use, clinical outcomes are comparable to IR TAC at one-year post-transplant. Notably, LCPT use does not increase the incidence of DGF and that this formulation of CNI can be used as first line therapy post-transplant.

Dosing strategies for de novo once-daily extended release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients based on CYP3A5 genotype

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus extended-release tablets have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the de novo kidney transplant population. Dosing requi rements often vary for tacrolimus based on several factors including variation in metabolism based on CYP3A5 expression. Patients who express CYP3A5 often require higher dosing of immediate-release tacrolimus, but this has not been established for tacrolimus extended-release tablets in the de novo setting.

AIM

To obtain target trough concentrations of extended-release tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients according to CYP3A5 genotype.

METHODS

Single-arm, prospective, single-center, open-label, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT037 13645). Life cycle pharma tacrolimus (LCPT) orally once daily at a starting dose of 0.13 mg/kg/day based on actual body weight. If weight is more than 120% of ideal body weight, an adjusted body weight was used. LCPT dose was adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 8-10 ng/mL. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 genotype was performed at study conclusion.

RESULTS

Mean time to therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentration was longer in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (6 d vs 13.5 d vs 4.5 d; P = 0.025). Mean tacrolimus doses and weight-based doses to achieve therapeutic concentration were higher in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (16 mg vs 16 mg vs 12 mg; P = 0.010) (0.20 mg/kg vs 0.19 mg/kg vs 0.13 mg/kg; P = 0.018). CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers experienced lower mean tacrolimus trough concentrations throughout the study period compared to CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers and non-expressers (7.98 ng/mL vs 9.18 ng/mL vs 10.78 ng/mL; P = 0 0.008). No differences were identified with regards to kidney graft function at 30-d post-transplant. Serious adverse events were reported for 13 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Expression of CYP3A5 leads to higher starting doses and incremental dosage titration of extended-release tacro limus to achieve target trough concentrations. We suggest a higher starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d for CYP3A5 expressers.

Comparison of a novel tablet formulation of tacrolimus and conventional capsule formulation in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The work aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and other outcomes reported in observational studies in de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving novel once-daily extended-release tablet tacrolimus (LCPT; LCP-tacrolimus; Envarsus XR) or receiving standard-of-care capsule tacrolimus (PR-Tac; prolonged-release tacrolimus; Advagraf/IR-Tac; immediate-release tacrolimus; Prograf). Methods: A systematic review was conducted for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating the outcomes in KTRs receiving LCPT or PR-Tac/IR-Tac. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, with no language restriction. The registered trials and references listed in relevant studies were also searched. Data were extracted for the PK profile, tacrolimus trough level (TTL), and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (Scr), biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate, delayed graft function (DGF) rate, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) rate, tremor rate (TR), death rate (DR), and rate of infection by cytomegalovirus (CMV). This study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023403787). Results: A total of seven eligible articles including 1,428 patients with 712 in the LCPT group versus 716 in the PR-Tac/IR-Tac group were included in this study for evidence synthesis. The baseline characteristics of the LCPT, PR-Tac, and IR-Tac groups were similar. The pooled analysis showed a higher PK profile in the LCPT group, and this result was consistent with those of all the included studies. In addition, no significant difference was observed for other outcomes. Conclusion: Considering heterogeneity between studies and potential bias, care providers should select agents based on patient-specific factors and their clinical experience for the immunosuppressive treatment of de novo KTRs.

Effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplant recipients: The PRETHI study

Data comparing long-term effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation are scarce. We compared the effectiveness, pharmacokinetic profile, and safety of LCPT (Envarsus) and PR-Tac (Advagraf) for up to 12 months post-transplant. Adult de novo liver transplant recipients who started IR-Tac (Prograf) and were converted to LCPT or PR-Tac 3-5 days post-transplant were included. Data from 163 patients were analyzed, 87 treated with LCPT and 76 with PR-Tac. The incidence of treatment failure was 30.5% in the LCPT group versus 23.0% in the PR-Tac group (p = .291). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reported in 26.8% of patients in the LCPT group and 17.6% in the PR-Tac group (p = .166). Graft loss was experienced in one patient (1.2%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p = .346). Death was registered in three patients (3.7%) in the LCPT group and three patients (4.1%) in the PR-Tac group (p > .999). Patients in the LCPT group showed 45.7% higher relative bioavailability (Cmin /total daily dose [TDD]; p < .01) with similar Cmin and 33.3% lower TDD versus PR-Tac (p < .01). The evolution of renal function, safety profile, and the incidence of post-transplant renal failure, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were similar in patients treated with LCPT and PR-Tac. In de novo liver transplant patients, LCPT and PR-Tac showed comparable effectiveness with higher relative bioavailability, similar Cmin and lower TDD in the LCPT group. Renal function, safety, and post-transplant complications were comparable in LCPT and PR-Tac groups.

CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22 Cluster Polymorphism Effects on LCP-Tac Tacrolimus Exposure: Population Pharmacokinetic Approach

The aim of the study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model and to investigate the influence of CYP3A5/CYP3A4 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the Tacrolimus PK parameters after LCP-Tac formulation in stable adult renal transplant patients. The model was developed, using NONMEM v7.5, from full PK profiles from a clinical study (n = 30) and trough concentrations (C0) from patient follow-up (n = 68). The PK profile of the LCP-Tac formulation was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination, parameterized in elimination (CL/F) and distributional (CLD/F) clearances and central compartment (Vc/F) and peripheral compartment (Vp/F) distribution volumes. A time-lagged first-order absorption process was characterized using transit compartment models. According to the structural part of the base model, the LCP-Tac showed an absorption profile characterized by two transit compartments and a mean transit time of 3.02 h. Inter-individual variability was associated with CL/F, Vc/F, and Vp/F. Adding inter-occasion variability (IOV) on CL/F caused a statistically significant reduction in the model minimum objective function MOFV (p < 0.001). Genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5 and a cluster of CYP3A4/A5 SNPs statistically significantly influenced Tac CL/F. In conclusion, a PopPK model was successfully developed for LCP-Tac formulation in stable renal transplant patients. CYP3A4/A5 SNPs as a combined cluster including three different phenotypes (high, intermediate, and poor metabolizers) was the most powerful covariate to describe part of the inter-individual variability associated with apparent elimination clearance. Considering this covariate in the initial dose estimation and during the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) would probably optimize Tac exposure attainments.

Long-term effects of average calcineurin inhibitor trough levels (over time) on renal function in a prospectively followed cohort of 150 kidney transplant recipients

More favorable clinical outcomes with medium-term follow-up have been reported among kidney transplant recipients receiving maintenance therapy consisting of "reduced-tacrolimus (TAC) dosing," mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and low-dose corticosteroids. However, it is not clear whether long-term maintenance therapy with reduced-calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dosing still leads to reduced renal function. A prospectively followed cohort of 150 kidney transplant recipients randomized to receive TAC/sirolimus (SRL) versus TAC/MMF versus cyclosporine microemulsion (CSA)/SRL, plus low-dose maintenance corticosteroids, now has 20 years of post-transplant follow-up. Average CNI trough levels over time among patients who were still alive with functioning grafts at 60, 120, and 180 months post-transplant were determined and ranked from smallest-to-largest for both TAC and CSA. Stepwise linear regression was used to determine whether these ranked average trough levels were associated with the patient's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at those times, particularly after controlling for other significant multivariable predictors. Experiencing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and older donor age were the two most significant multivariable predictors of poorer eGFR at 60, 120, and 180 months post-transplant (p < 000001 and 0.000003 for older donor age at 60 and 120 months; p = 0.00008 and <0.000001 for previous BPAR at 60 and 120 months). Assignment to CSA also implied a significantly poorer eGFR (but with less magnitudes of effect) in multivariable analysis at 60 and 120 months (p = 0.01 and 0.002). Higher ranked average CNI trough levels had no association with eGFR at any timepoint in either univariable or multivariable analysis (p > 0.70). Long-term maintenance therapy with reduced-CNI dosing does not appear to cause reduced renal function.

A prospective controlled, randomized clinical trial of kidney transplant recipients developed personalized tacrolimus dosing using model-based Bayesian Prediction

For three decades, tacrolimus (Tac) dose adjustment in clinical practice has been calculated empirically according to the manufacturer's labeling based on a patient's body weight. Here, we developed and validated a Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model including pharmacogenetics (cluster CYP3A4/CYP3A5), age, and hematocrit. Our study aimed to assess the clinical applicability of this PPK model in the achievement of Tac Co (therapeutic trough Tac concentration) compared to the manufacturer's labelling dosage. A prospective two-arm, randomized, clinical trial was conducted to determine Tac starting and subsequent dose adjustments in 90 kidney transplant recipients. Patients were randomized to a control group with Tac adjustment according to the manufacturer's labeling or the PPK group adjusted to reach target Co (6-10 ng/ml) after the first steady state (primary endpoint) using a Bayesian prediction model (NONMEM). A significantly higher percentage of patients from the PPK group (54.8%) compared with the control group (20.8%) achieved the therapeutic target fulfilling 30% of the established superiority margin defined. Patients receiving PPK showed significantly less intra-patient variability compared to the control group, reached the Tac Co target sooner (5 days vs 10 days), and required significantly fewer Tac dose modifications compared to the control group within 90 days following kidney transplant. No statistically significant differences occurred in clinical outcomes. Thus, PPK-based Tac dosing offers significant superiority for starting Tac prescription over classical labeling-based dosing according to the body weight, which may optimize Tac-based therapy in the first days following transplantation.

Tacrolimus Exposure Before and After a Switch From Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus: The ENVARSWITCH Study

LCP-tacrolimus displays enhanced oral bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. The ENVARSWITCH study aimed to compare tacrolimus AUC0-24 h in stable kidney (KTR) and liver transplant recipients (LTR) on IR-tacrolimus converted to LCP-tacrolimus, in order to re-evaluate the 1:0.7 dose ratio recommended in the context of a switch and the efficiency of the subsequent dose adjustment. Tacrolimus AUC0-24 h was obtained by Bayesian estimation based on three concentrations measured in dried blood spots before (V2), after the switch (V3), and after LCP-tacrolimus dose adjustment intended to reach the pre-switch AUC0-24 h (V4). AUC0-24 h estimates and distributions were compared using the bioequivalence rule for narrow therapeutic range drugs (Westlake 90% CI within 0.90-1.11). Fifty-three KTR and 48 LTR completed the study with no major deviation. AUC0-24 h bioequivalence was met in the entire population and in KTR between V2 and V4 and between V2 and V3. In LTR, the Westlake 90% CI was close to the acceptance limits between V2 and V4 (90% CI = [0.96-1.14]) and between V2 and V3 (90% CI = [0.96-1.15]). The 1:0.7 dose ratio is convenient for KTR but may be adjusted individually for LTR. The combination of DBS and Bayesian estimation for tacrolimus dose adjustment may help with reaching appropriate exposure to tacrolimus rapidly after a switch.

IgG4-related sclerosing thyroiditis (Riedel-Struma): a review of clinicopathological features and management

We present a thorough review of the literature on Riedel thyroiditis (RT) with emphasis on aetiology, diagnosis and management, using the PubMed, Sinomed, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Although the exact aetiology of RT remains obscure, the histopathological features are consistent with a localized form of IgG4-related systemic disease (IgG4-RSD). Nevertheless, IgG4-RSD as a systemic fibroinflammatory disorder per se rarely affects the thyroid in the context of multiorgan manifestations. The initial diagnosis of RT is based on clinical history and imaging, but confirmation by histopathological examination is mandatory. In contrast to the historical surgical approach, glucocorticosteroid therapy is currently considered first line therapy, in line with the RT currently being viewed as a manifestation of, or analogous to, IgG4-RSD. For disease relapse, immunomodulatory agents (azathioprine, methotrexate, rituximab) can be used.

Individualized dosing algorithms for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: current status and unmet needs

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug with many side effects including nephrotoxicity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus. To limit its toxicity, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed. However, tacrolimus' pharmacokinetics are highly variable within and between individuals, which complicates their clinical management. Despite TDM, many kidney transplant recipients will experience under- or overexposure to tacrolimus. Therefore, dosing algorithms have been developed to limit the time a patient is exposed to off-target concentrations.

AREAS COVERED

Tacrolimus starting dose algorithms and models for follow-up doses developed and/or tested since 2015, encompassing both adult and pediatric populations. Literature was searched in different databases, i.e. Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Register, and Google Scholar, from inception to February 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Many algorithms have been developed, but few have been prospectively evaluated. These performed better than bodyweight-based starting doses, regarding the time a patient is exposed to off-target tacrolimus concentrations. No benefit in reduced tacrolimus toxicity has yet been observed. Most algorithms were developed from small datasets, contained only a few tacrolimus concentrations per person, and were not externally validated. Moreover, other matrices should be considered which might better correlate with tacrolimus toxicity than the whole-blood concentration, e.g. unbound plasma or intra-lymphocytic tacrolimus concentrations.

The Effect of Intracellular Tacrolimus Exposure on Calcineurin Inhibition in Immediate- and Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations

Despite intensive monitoring of whole blood tacrolimus concentrations, acute rejection after kidney transplantation occurs during tacrolimus therapy. Intracellular tacrolimus concentrations could better reflect exposure at the site of action and its pharmacodynamics (PD). Intracellular pharmacokinetic (PK) profile following different tacrolimus formulations (immediate-release (TAC-IR) and extended-release (TAC-LCP)) remains unclear. Therefore, the aim was to study intracellular tacrolimus PK of TAC-IR and TAC-LCP and its correlation with whole blood (WhB) PK and PD. A post-hoc analysis of a prospective, open-label, crossover investigator-driven clinical trial (NCT02961608) was performed. Intracellular and WhB tacrolimus 24 h time-concentration curves were measured in 23 stable kidney transplant recipients. PD analysis was evaluated measuring calcineurin activity (CNA) and simultaneous intracellular PK/PD modelling analysis was conducted. Higher dose-adjusted pre-dose intracellular concentrations (C₀ and C₂₄) and total exposure (AUC_0-24) values were found for TAC-LCP than TAC-IR. Lower intracellular peak concentration (C_max) was found after TAC-LCP. Correlations between C₀, C₂₄ and AUC_0-24 were observed within both formulations. Intracellular kinetics seems to be limited by WhB disposition, in turn, limited by tacrolimus release/absorption processes from both formulations. The faster intracellular elimination after TAC-IR was translated into a more rapid recovery of CNA. An Emax model relating % inhibition and intracellular concentrations, including both formulations, showed an IC₅₀, a concentration to achieve 50% CNA inhibition, of 43.9 pg/million cells.

EnGraft: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, superiority study protocol to assess bioavailability and practicability of Envarsus® versus Advagraf™ in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Graft rejection and chronic CNI toxicity remain obstacles to organ transplant success. Current formulations of tacrolimus, such as Prograf® and Advagraf™, exhibit limitations in terms of pharmacokinetics and tolerability, related in part to suboptimal bioavailability. As dosing non-compliance can result in graft rejection, the once daily formulation of tacrolimus, Advagraf™, was developed (vs 2x/day Prograf®). Benefits of Advagraf™ are counterbalanced by delayed achievement of therapeutic trough levels and need for up to 50% higher doses to maintain Prograf®-equivalent troughs. Envarsus® is also a prolonged-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation, developed using MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to increase drug bioavailability; improved bioavailability results in low patient drug absorption variability and less pronounced peak-to-trough fluctuations. In phase III de novo kidney transplant studies, Envarsus® proved non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus; however, no phase IV studies show superiority of Envarsus® vs Advagraf™ in de novo liver transplant (LTx) recipients.

METHODS

The EnGraft compares bioavailability and tests superiority of Envarsus® (test arm) versus Advagraf™ (comparator arm) in de novo LTx recipients. A total of 268 patients from 15 German transplant centres will be randomised 1:1 within 14 days post-LTx. The primary endpoint is dose-normalised trough level (C/D ratio) measured 12 weeks after randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the number of dose adjustments, time to reach first defined trough level and incidence of graft rejections. Additionally, clinical and laboratory parameters will be assessed over a 3-year period.

DISCUSSION

C/D ratio is an estimate for tacrolimus bioavailability. Improving bioavailability and increasing C/D ratio using Envarsus could reduce renal dysfunction and other tacrolimus-related toxicities; previous trials have shown that a higher C/D ratio (i.e. slower tacrolimus metabolism) is not only associated with improved renal function but also linked to reduced neurotoxic side effects. A higher C/D ratio could improve clinical outcomes for LTx recipients; EnGraft has begun, with one third of patients recruited by January 2022.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered (4 May 2020) in the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT-Nummer: 2020-000796-20. Additionally, this trial has been registered (22 January 2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04720326. The trial received a favourable opinion from the concerned lead ethics committee at the University of Regensburg, under the reference 20-1842-112.

Envarsus XR® pharmacokinetics in adolescents post-kidney transplantation - A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Envarsus XR® (LCPT), a once daily dosage formulation of tacrolimus, is an FDA-approved medication in adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). There are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescent RTRs. We report here the PK profile of LCPT in adolescent RTRs.

METHODS

The dose of LCPT was determined using a dose conversion ratio targeting 0.7 relative to the total daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) dose. On day 7 after converting to LCPT, patients had an abbreviated PK assessment with sampling at: 0 h (pre-dose), 8-, and 12-h post-dose. The PK data analysis was performed using Bayesian estimators. Our results were compared to those of published adult PK data for LCPT and pediatric PK data for IR-Tac and extended release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) formulation (Advagraf).

RESULTS

PK data from three adolescent patients on LCPT were evaluated. The mean (±SD) area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) was 240 (±20.22) h*ng/mL. The mean T_max was 9.01 ± 2.12 h, and the % fluctuation was 77.71 ± 3.96%. The AUC, T_max , and % fluctuation were similar to reported results in adult patients taking LCPT. The AUC was higher and the T_max was longer than what has been reported in pediatric patients taking IR-Tac and ER-Tac. In addition, the LCPT group showed a lower % fluctuation than patients receiving ER-Tac.

CONCLUSION

The PK evaluation of LCPT in adolescent RTRs showed similar results to adults. Adolescents taking LCPT had a higher AUC, a more attenuated T_max , and a lower fluctuation than that seen with ER-Tac in pediatrics.

Evaluation of Weight-Based Dose During Transition From Immediate-Release to Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Manufacturer recommendations for conversion from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus, Envarsus XR®, suggests 80% of the total daily dose of the immediate-release formulation. This conversion has not consistently achieved therapeutic levels in the kidney transplant population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a reliable weight-based dosing strategy could be utilized to transition kidney transplant patients from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus. This may help establish a safe protocol to guide transition between formulations.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study of adult kidney transplant recipients between July 2015 and December 2018. Excluded patients received dual organs, lacked appropriately drawn tacrolimus levels, or were prescribed interacting medications. Patients were identified by querying prescriptions for extended-release tacrolimus and chart review was performed to exclude any patients without sufficient follow-up after transition.

RESULTS

30 patients who transitioned from immediate-release tacrolimus to tacrolimus XR were included in the final analysis. The median weight-based dose of tacrolimus XR that achieved a therapeutic level among the cohort was 0.158 mg/kg/day (Q1-Q3: 0.0587-0.221), which was about 80% of the original median weight-based immediate-release tacrolimus dose. Therapeutic dosing strategies were widely variable, represented by an R² of 0.33 on linear regression. There was a statistically significant difference in median weight-based dosing strategies among patients of various racial backgrounds (p = 0.0148).

CONCLUSIONS

A weight-based dose of tacrolimus XR could not reliably predict a therapeutic level among the total cohort due to the wide inter-patient variability. The median weight-based rate of conversion from immediate-release to extended-release tacrolimus was 80%.

Real-life comparison of efficacy and safety profiles of two prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 24 months of follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Calcineurin inhibitors constitute a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. There are two main formulations of tacrolimus (Tac) which exhibit a prolonged-release mode of action: Advagraf® (MR-4) and Envarsus® (LCPT). However, they are not bioequivalent. Data comparing both once-daily prolonged-release formulations of Tac are insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare safety and efficacy profiles of once-daily LCPT and MR-4 formulations of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, cohort single-center study was performed. One hundred fifteen kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2016 and 2019 were enrolled to the study (59 vs 56, Envarsus® vs Advagraf®, respectively). Safety and efficacy profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival at 12 and 24 months did not differ between the groups. There were no significant differences in serum creatinine at any timepoint. C/D ratio in the LCPT group was significantly higher at 12 and 24 months. Sepsis occurrence was more frequent in MR-4 group at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Both prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus are safe and effective in immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

Outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with immediate-release tacrolimus capsules versus extended-release tacrolimus capsules: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Prior randomized trials and observational studies have generally reported similar outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) versus extended-release tacrolimus (ER-TAC). However, many of these previous studies focused on patients with low immunological risks, had small sample sizes and brief follow-up periods, and excluded outcomes associated with graft loss, such as chronic rejection.

METHODS

To address these limitations, we conducted a cohort study of 848 KTRs at a single transplantation center who had generally high immunological risks and were treated with either IR-TAC capsules (589 patients, 65.9%) or ER-TAC capsules (289 patients, 34.1%). All patients received their designated maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for at least 3 months post-transplantation. Afterwards, tacrolimus formulation was at the discretion of each patient's transplant nephrologist. For the two treatment groups, we compared the hazards of experiencing a composite outcome of acute or chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute or chronic T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo DSA, and/or graft loss over a 3-year period starting at 3 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, KTRs treated with IR-TAC capsules had an increased hazard of experiencing the composite outcome when compared to patients treated with ER-TAC capsules; however, this result was not significant (adj HR 1.24, 95% CI .92-1.68, p = .163). Similar results were obtained with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using a propensity score (adj HR 1.25, 95% CI .93-1.68, p = .146).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that when compared to IR-TAC capsules, ER-TAC capsules do not reduce the hazard of poor outcomes in KTRs with generally high immunological risks.

COVID-19 in a pregnant kidney transplant recipient - what we need to know: A case report

BACKGROUND

In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection, developing severe morbidity and graft impairment. Pregnant women are also more likely to develop severe COVID-19 disease, causing pregnancy complications such as preterm births and acute kidney injury.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report the case of a pregnant woman with a third kidney transplantation who developed COVID-19 disease. The reduction of immunosuppressive drugs and strict monitoring of trough blood levels were needed to avoid severe SARS-CoV-2-related complications, and permitted to continue a healthy pregnancy and maintain good graft function. In such a complex scenario, the concomitance of COVID-19-related morbidity, the risk of acute rejection in the hyperimmune recipient, graft dysfunction and pregnancy complications make the management of immunosuppression a very difficult task and clinicians must be aware.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring the immunosuppressive regimen is a key factor affecting both the graft outcome and pregnancy safety.

Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation

The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability—and ambiguity—in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.

Body composition is associated with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients

Purpose

A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model may be used to improve tacrolimus dosing and minimize under- and overexposure in kidney transplant recipients. It is unknown how body composition parameters relate to tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and which parameter correlates best with tacrolimus exposure. The aims of this study were to investigate which body composition parameter has the best association with the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and to describe this relationship in a popPK model.

Methods

Body composition was assessed using bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). Lean tissue mass, adipose tissue mass, over-hydration, and phase angle were measured with BIS and then evaluated as covariates. The final popPK model was evaluated using goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and a bootstrap analysis.

Results

In 46 kidney transplant recipients, 284 tacrolimus concentrations were measured. The base model without body composition parameters included age, plasma albumin, plasma creatinine, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotypes, and hematocrit as covariates. After full forward inclusion and backward elimination, only the effect of the phase angle on clearance (dOFV =  − 13.406; p < 0.01) was included in the final model. Phase angle was positively correlated with tacrolimus clearance. The inter-individual variability decreased from 41.7% in the base model to 34.2% in the final model. The model was successfully validated.

Conclusion

The phase angle is the bio-impedance spectroscopic parameter that correlates best with tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Incorporation of the phase angle in a popPK model can improve the prediction of an individual’s tacrolimus dose requirement after transplantation.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03323-0.

Prolonged-Release Once-Daily Formulation of Tacrolimus Versus Standard-of-Care Tacrolimus in de novo Kidney Transplant Patients Across Europe

Background: Tacrolimus is the calcineurin inhibitor of choice for preventing acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant patients. However, tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic range that requires regular monitoring of blood concentrations to minimize toxicity. A new once-daily tacrolimus formulation, LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT), has been developed, which uses MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to control drug release and enhance overall bioavailability. Our study compared dosing of LCPT with current standard-of-care tacrolimus [immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-Tac)] during the 6 months following de novo kidney transplantation. Comparisons of graft function, clinical outcomes, safety, and tolerability for LCPT versus IR-Tac/PR-Tac were also performed.

Methods: Standard immunological risk patients with end-stage renal disease who had received a de novo kidney transplant were randomized (1:1) to LCPT (N = 200) or IR-Tac/PR-Tac (N = 201).

Results: Least squares (LS) mean tacrolimus total daily dose from Week 3 to Month 6 was significantly lower for LCPT than for IR-Tac/PR-Tac. Although LS mean tacrolimus trough levels were significantly higher for LCPT than IR-Tac/PR-Tac, tacrolimus trough levels remained within the standard reference range for most patients. There were no differences between the groups in treatment failure measures or safety profile.

Conclusion: LCPT can achieve similar clinical outcomes to other tacrolimus formulations, with a lower daily dose.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02432833.

Improved Kidney Allograft Function after Early Conversion of Fast IR-Tac Metabolizers to LCP-Tac

Fast tacrolimus (Tac) metabolism is associated with a more rapid decline of renal function after renal transplantation (RTx). Because the pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tac (LCPT) and immediate-release Tac (IR-Tac) differ, we hypothesized that switching from IR-Tac to LCPT in kidney transplant recipients would improve the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), particularly in fast metabolizers. For proof of concept, we performed a pilot study including RTx patients who received de novo immunosuppression with IR-Tac. A Tac concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio) < 1.05 ng/mL·1/mg defined fast metabolizers and ≥1.05 ng/mL·1/mg slow metabolizers one month after RTx. Patients were switched to LCPT ≥ 1 month after transplantation and followed for 3 years. Fast metabolizers (n = 58) were switched to LCPT earlier than slow metabolizers (n = 22) after RTx (2.0 (1.0−253.1) vs. 13.2 (1.2−172.8) months, p = 0.005). Twelve months after the conversion to LCPT, Tac doses were reduced by about 65% in both groups. The C/D ratios at 12 months had increased from 0.66 (0.24−2.10) to 1.74 (0.42−5.43) in fast and from 1.15 (0.32−3.60) to 2.75 (1.08−5.90) in slow metabolizers. Fast metabolizers showed noticeable recovery of mean eGFR already one month after the conversion (48.5 ± 17.6 vs. 41.5 ± 17.0 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.032) and at all subsequent time points, whereas the eGFR in slow metabolizers remained stable. Switching to LCPT increased Tac bioavailability, C/D ratio, and was associated with a noticeable recovery of renal function in fast metabolizers. Conversion to LCPT is safe and beneficial early after RTx.

A randomized crossover study comparing different tacrolimus formulations to reduce intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients

A high intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus exposure is a risk factor for poor long‐term outcomes after kidney transplantation. The main objective of this trial was to investigate whether tacrolimus IPV decreases after switching patients from immediate‐release (IR)‐tacrolimus to either extended‐release (ER)‐tacrolimus or LifeCyclePharma (LCP)‐tacrolimus. In this randomized, prospective, open‐label, cross‐over trial, adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable immunosuppressive regimen, including IR‐tacrolimus, were randomized for conversion to ER‐tacrolimus or LCP‐tacrolimus, and for the order in which IR‐tacrolimus and the once‐daily formulations were taken. Patients were followed 6 months for each formulation, with monthly tacrolimus predose concentration assessments to calculate the IPV. The IPV was defined as the coefficient of variation (%) of dose corrected predose concentrations. Ninety‐two patients were included for analysis of the primary outcome. No significant differences between the IPV of IR‐tacrolimus (16.6%) and the combined once‐daily formulations (18.3%) were observed (% difference +1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.1% to ‒4.5%, p = 0.24). The IPV of LCP‐tacrolimus (20.1%) was not significantly different from the IPV of ER‐tacrolimus (16.5%, % difference +3.6%, 95% CI −0.1% to 7.3%, p = 0.06). In conclusion, the IPV did not decrease after switching from IR‐tacrolimus to either ER‐tacrolimus or LCP‐tacrolimus. These results provide no arguments to switch kidney transplant recipients from twice‐daily (IR) tacrolimus formulations to once‐daily (modified‐release) tacrolimus formulations when the aim is to lower the IPV.

Bioavailability of once-daily tacrolimus formulations used in clinical practice in the management of De Novo kidney transplant recipients: the better study

Multicenter, prospective, observational study to compare the relative bioavailability of once‐daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients. De novo kidney transplant recipients who started a tacrolimus‐based regimen were included 14 days post‐transplant and followed up for 6 months. Data from 218 participants were evaluated: 129 in the LCPT group (Envarsus) and 89 in the PR‐Tac (Advagraf) group. Patients in the LCPT group exhibited higher relative bioavailability (C_min /total daily dose [TDD]) vs. PR‐Tac (61% increase; P < .001) with similar C_min and 30% lower TDD levels (P < .0001). The incidence of treatment failure was 3.9% in the LCPT group and 9.0% in the PR‐Tac group (P = .117). Study discontinuation rates were 6.2% in the LCPT group and 12.4% in the PR‐Tac group (P = .113). Adverse events, renal function and other complications were comparable between groups. The median accumulated dose of tacrolimus in the LCPT group from day 14 to month 6 was 889 mg. Compared to PR‐Tac, LCPT showed higher relative bioavailability, similar effectiveness at preventing allograft rejection, comparable effect on renal function, safety, adherence, treatment failure and premature discontinuation rates.

Machine learning-based method for tacrolimus dose predictions in Chinese kidney transplant perioperative patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus (TAC), a first-line immunosuppressant in solid-organ transplant, has a narrow therapeutic window and large inter-individual variability, which affects its use in clinical practice. Successful predictions using machine learning algorithms have been reported in several fields. However, a comparison of 10 machine learning model-based TAC pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic dosing algorithms for kidney transplant perioperative patients of Chinese descent has not been reported. The objective of this study was to screen and establish an appropriate machine learning method to predict the individualized dosages of TAC for perioperative kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

The records of 2551 patients were collected from three transplant centres, 80% of which were randomly selected as a 'derivation cohort' to develop the dose prediction algorithm, while the remaining 20% constituted a 'validation cohort' to validate the final algorithm selected. Important features were screened according to our previously established population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus. The performances of the algorithms were evaluated and compared using R-squared and the mean percentage in the remaining 20% of patients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This study identified several factors influencing TAC dosage, including CYP3A5 rs776746, CYP3A4 rs4646437, haematocrit, Wuzhi capsules, TAC daily dose, age, height, weight, post-operative time, nifedipine and the medication history of the patient. According to our results, among the 10 machine learning models, the extra trees regressor (ETR) algorithm showed the best performance in the training set (R-squared: 1, mean percentage within 20%: 100%) and test set (R-squared: 0.85, mean percentage within 20%: 92.77%) of the derivation cohort. The ETR model successfully predicted the ideal TAC dosage in 97.73% of patients, especially in the intermediate dosage range (>5 mg/day to <8 mg/day), whereby the ideal TAC dosage could be successfully predicted in 99% of the patients.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the ETR algorithm, which was chosen to establish the dose prediction model, performed better than the other nine machine learning models. This study is the first to establish ETR algorithms to predict TAC dosage. This study will further promote the individualized medication of TAC in kidney transplant patients in the future, which has great significance in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of drug use.

Immunosuppression and Kidney Transplantation

Immunosuppression is complex, fraught with on-target and off-target adverse effects, and hard to get right but is the key to successful allotransplantation. Herein, we review the key immunosuppressive agent classes used for kidney transplant, highlighting mechanisms of action and typical clinical use.

De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus). We compared the efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. Twenty-five prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 1 year was compared using non-inferiority analysis. LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 20% (90% CI: -40%, -.5%; non-inferiority P = .001). Tacrolimus trough levels peaked at 2-3 months and were higher in LCPT (median 14.5 vs. 12.7 ng/ml; P = .03) with similar dose levels (LCPT vs. IR-tacrolimus: .08 vs. .09 mg/kg/day; P = .33). Cardiovascular-related readmissions were reduced by 62% (P = .046) in LCPT patients. The complication rate per transplant admission and all-cause readmission rate did not differ significantly. These results suggest that LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus with a similar safety profile and improved bioavailability in OHT.

Comparing the pharmacokinetics of extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release formulations in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

One of the most commonly used immunosuppressants in organ transplant, tacrolimus exhibits wide interpatient and intrapatient variability and narrow therapeutic index that necessitates routine concentration monitoring and dosage adjustments. Availability of modified -release tacrolimus products offer once-daily dosing options. The objective of this review is to highlight and compare available pharmacokinetic (PK) data of extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) in kidney transplant recipients.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase search to identify relevant articles evaluating PK data for LCP-TAC compared to IR-TAC in kidney transplant patients including special populations.

EXPERT OPINION

LCP-TAC's unique PK profile may be more favorable than IR-TAC. While the clinical impact of these PK differences have not been established, several outcomes are being evaluated in ongoing studies. Results of these studies will add information incrementally to care for kidney transplant patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating kidney and patient survival differences are needed but it is unlikely that they will be conducted. Given that the patent exclusivity of LCP-TAC for the next several years and imminent loss of exclusivity of PR-TAC, our opinion is the use of LCP-TAC will be increasing, especially in Europe.

Evaluating the conversion to extended-release tacrolimus from immediate-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A new formulation of once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-tac, Envarsus XR) was approved for use in the USA for kidney transplant recipients in 2015. There are limited data regarding real-world observations with conversion to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients treated with LCP-tac. Data collection included (1) reasons for switching to LCP-tac; (2) conversion ratio used; (3) kidney function at time of conversion and 3 months after; (4) outcomes of conversion [acute cellular rejection rates and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia] within 3 months of conversion.

RESULTS

Average conversion ratio used to achieve therapeutic drug level without further dose adjustment was 1:0.73 (SD 0.11). Median time after transplant was 508 days (IQR 736). Common reasons patients were switched to LCP-tac were from fluctuations in tacrolimus levels (44%) and adverse effect of tremor (32%). Among patients who were switched due to tremors 88% noted significant improvement. There was no difference in serum creatinine (P = 0.55) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.64) from baseline to 3 months postconversion. There were no episodes of acute cellular rejections or CMV viremia postconversion.

CONCLUSION

This observational study demonstrated that conversion of immediate-release tacrolimus to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients was well tolerated and effective.

CYP3A4∗22 Genotyping in Clinical Practice: Ready for Implementation?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the most important drug metabolizing enzyme in the liver, responsible for the oxidative metabolism of ∼50% of clinically prescribed drugs. Therefore, genetic variation in CYP3A4 could potentially affect the pharmacokinetics, toxicity and clinical outcome of drug treatment. Thus far, pharmacogenetics for CYP3A4 has not received much attention. However, the recent discovery of the intron 6 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs35599367C > T, encoding the CYP3A4^∗22 allele, led to several studies into the pharmacogenetic effect of CYP3A4^∗22 on different drugs. This allele has a relatively minor allele frequency of 3-5% and an effect on CYP3A4 enzymatic activity. Thus far, no review summarizing the data published on several drugs is available yet. This article therefore addresses the current knowledge on CYP3A4^∗22. This information may help in deciding if, and for which drugs, CYP3A4^∗22 genotype-based dosing could be helpful in improving drug therapy. CYP3A4^∗22 was shown to significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of several drugs, with currently being most thoroughly investigated tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and statins. Additional studies, focusing on toxicity and clinical outcome, are warranted to demonstrate clinical utility of CYP3A4^∗22 genotype-based dosing.

Cost-effectiveness of once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus among Hispanic and Black kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is a first-line immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients. Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) have been shown to be efficacious, particularly for Hispanic and Black patient subpopulations who are rapid metabolizers, but is more costly than twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LCPT during the first year of treatment vs IR-Tac in kidney transplant recipients who are Hispanic or Black. METHODS: A decision analytic model from a US payer perspective was developed using (1) subgroup outcomes data pooled from two phase 3 clinical trials that compared LCPT and IR-Tac, and (2) direct costs from real-world data sources (ie, costs of LCPT and IR-Tac treatments, biopsy-proven acute rejection, treatment-related serious adverse events [SAEs], graft failure, and consequent dialysis). The primary outcome was cost per successfully treated patient, defined as having a functioning graft after 1 year and without treatment-related SAEs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses established distributions for cost and outcomes estimates, and a series of one-way sensitivity analyses identified parameters that had the most effect on results. RESULTS: Total overall cost for the Hispanic group was $14,765 for LCPT and $12,416 for IR-Tac, and total cost in the Black group was $16,626 for LCPT and $9,871 for IR-Tac. Total overall effectiveness of LCPT and IR-Tac was 88.32% and 84.75% in the Hispanic group and 93.24% and 85.78% in the Black group, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for using LCPT over IR-Tac during the first year of treatment in the Hispanic group was $65,643 per additional successfully treated patient. The ICER for the Black group was $90,458. The single parameter having the most impact on results in both groups was the probability of a treatment-related SAE in IR-Tac, which accounted for 49% of variation in results in the Hispanic group and 46% in the Black group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results for both groups show that LCPT is incrementally more costly and more effective compared with IR-Tac, indicating a trade-off scenario. LCPT is a cost-effective strategy if a decision makers' willingness to pay for 1 additional successfully treated patient exceeds the ICER and must be weighed against the costs of graft loss, continuing dialysis, and potential retransplant. This study provides a foundation for further research to update and expand inputs as more data become available to improve real-world relevance and decision making. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which provided clinical trial file data and nonbinding feedback on the model structure, data interpretation, clinical expertise, manuscript review, and areas of publication interest (ie, managed care). Hurwitz, Grizzle, Villa Zapata, and Malone received grant funding from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., through University of Arizona to conduct research and analysis for this study. Tyler is employed by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the data reported and used in this research were available from the US Renal Data System, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utility Project. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the US government.

Sustained Inhibition of Calcineurin Activity With a Melt-Dose Once-daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Renal Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus (Tac) is the cornerstone calcineurin inhibitor in transplantation. Extended-release Meltdose formulation (Tac-LCP) offers better bioavailability compared with immediate-release formulation (Tac-IR). We postulated that the less fluctuating pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Tac-LCP might maintain a sustained inhibition of calcineurin activity (CNA) between dose intervals. Higher concentrations (peak plasma concentration (C_max )) after Tac-IR may not result in a more potent CNA inhibition due to a capacity-limited effect. This study was aimed at evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD)/PK profiles of Tac-IR compared with Tac-LCP. An open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, investigator-driven study was conducted. Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients receiving Tac-IR were switched to Tac-LCP. Before and 28 days after conversion, intensive CNA-PD and PK sampling were conducted using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem accurate mass spectrometry. PD nonlinear mixed effects model was performed in Phoenix-WinNonlin. Statistically significant higher C_max (P < 0.001) after Tac-IR did not result in lower CNA as compared with after Tac-LCP (P = 0.860). Tac-LCP showed a statistically more maintained CNA inhibition between dose intervals (area under the effect-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUE_0-24h )) compared with Tac-IR, in which CNA returned to predose levels after 4 hours of drug intake (373.8 vs. 290.5 pmol RII·h/min·mg prot, Tac-LCP vs. Tac-IR; P = 0.039). No correlation was achieved between any PD and PK parameters in any formulations. Moreover, Tac concentration to elicit a 50% of the maximum response (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was 9.24 ng/mL. The higher C_max after Tac-IR does not result in an additional CNA inhibition compared with Tac-LCP attributable to a capacity-limited effect. Tac-LCP may represent an improvement of the PD of Tac due to the more sustained CNA inhibition during dose intervals.

Clinical Experience with Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) prescribing information states that there is insufficient data in older adult patients from which to make recommendations on use in this population. This study sought to provide information on de novo use of LCP-Tac in the older adult kidney transplant population.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study had two distinct objectives; to determine if weight-based doses of LCP-Tac differ based on recipient age and to compare safety and efficacy between LCP-Tac and immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in older adult transplant recipients. Data was obtained through electronic chart review up to 2 years after transplant with censoring for graft loss and death.

RESULTS

Weight-based doses were compared between patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 84), 36-64 years (n = 64), and ≤35 years (n = 44). LCP-Tac weight-based doses were lower at all time points in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Both age and race significantly impacted required dose on linear regression. The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation. In the older adult population, graft outcomes and infectious and metabolic complications were compared between recipients of LCP-Tac (n = 84) and IR-Tac (n = 42). Within this cohort, there were no differences between LCP-Tac and IR-Tac on graft function, rejection, graft loss, death, cytomegalovirus viremia, BK viremia, hypertension, diabetes, alopecia, or tremor up to 2 years after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adult recipients required significantly lower LCP-Tac doses compared with younger recipients and with the FDA-labeled starting dose. There were no differences in graft outcomes or adverse effects in older adult patients who received LCP-Tac versus IR-Tac.

Once daily tacrolimus conversion in lung transplantation: A prospective study on safety and medication adherence

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) requires a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimen. A once daily (QD) tacrolimus regimen was developed to increase medication adherence. However, data concerning its safety and efficacy in LTx are lacking.

METHODS

In this prospective study, stable LTx patients were consecutively converted from twice daily (BID) tacrolimus to QD tacrolimus on a 1 mg:1 mg basis. Trough level (C_min), renal function, cholesterol, fasting glucose, potassium and lung function were monitored six months before and up to one year after conversion. Adherence and its barriers were assessed by self-reported questionnaires (Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) and Identification of Medication Adherence Barriers questionnaire (IMAB)) and blood-based assays (mean C_min and coefficient of variation (CV)).

RESULTS

We included 372 patients, in whom we observed a decrease in tacrolimus C_min of 18.5% (p < 0.0001) post-conversion, requiring subsequent daily dose adaptations in both cystic fibrosis (CF) (n = 72) and non-CF patients (n = 300). We observed a small decrease in eGFR one year post-conversion (p = 0.024). No significant changes in blood creatinine, potassium, fasting glucose, cholesterol or rate of lung function decline were observed. In a subgroup of 166 patients, significantly fewer patients missed doses (8.4% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.016) or had irregular intake post-conversion (19.3% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.019). Mean C_min and CV, as well as the total number of barriers, also decreased significantly post-conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

In LTx, conversion from BID to QD tacrolimus (1 mg:1 mg) requires close monitoring of tacrolimus C_min. QD tacrolimus after transplantation is safe with respect to renal function, metabolic parameters and allograft function and improves LTx recipient adherence.

Avoiding Tacrolimus Underexposure and Overexposure with a Dosing Algorithm for Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Arm Prospective Intervention Trial

Bodyweight‐based tacrolimus dosing followed by therapeutic drug monitoring is standard clinical care after renal transplantation. However, after transplantation, a meager 38% of patients are on target at first steady‐state and it can take up to 3 weeks to reach the target tacrolimus predose concentration (C₀). Tacrolimus underexposure and overexposure is associated with an increased risk of rejection and drug‐related toxicity, respectively. To minimize subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic tacrolimus exposure in the immediate post‐transplant phase, a previously developed dosing algorithm to predict an individual’s tacrolimus starting dose was tested prospectively. In this single‐arm, prospective, therapeutic intervention trial, 60 de novo kidney transplant recipients received a tacrolimus starting dose based on a dosing algorithm instead of a standard, bodyweight‐based dose. The algorithm included cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and CYP3A5 genotype, body surface area, and age as covariates. The target tacrolimus C₀, measured for the first time at day 3, was 7.5–12.5 ng/mL. Between February 23, 2019, and July 7, 2020, 60 patients were included. One patient was excluded because of a protocol violation. On day 3 post‐transplantation, 34 of 59 patients (58%, 90% CI 47–68%) had a tacrolimus C₀ within the therapeutic range. Markedly subtherapeutic (< 5.0 ng/mL) and supratherapeutic (> 20 ng/mL) tacrolimus concentrations were observed in 7% and 3% of the patients, respectively. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection occurred in three patients (5%). In conclusion, algorithm‐based tacrolimus dosing leads to the achievement of the tacrolimus target C₀ in as many as 58% of the patients on day 3 after kidney transplantation.

Real-World Administration of Once-Daily MeltDose® Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Allows for Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus and Stabilizes Graft Function Following Liver Transplantation

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is included in most immunosuppressive protocols after liver transplantation. This retrospective, observational 24-month study investigated the tolerability of once-daily MeltDose^® prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) after switching from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in a real-world cohort of 150 patients with previous liver transplantation. No graft rejection or new safety signals were observed. Only 7.3% of patients discontinued LCPT due to side effects. In the overall patient population, median liver transaminases, total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and HbA_1c remained constant after switching to LCPT. Total cholesterol significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.002) in patients with initially elevated levels (>200 mg/dL). A total of 71.8% of 96 patients maintained a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² throughout the study, while 44.7% of patients were classified as fast metabolizers and 55.3% as slow metabolizers. Median daily tacrolimus dose could be reduced by 50% in fast metabolizers and by 30% in slow metabolizers, while trough levels were maintained in the target range (4–6 ng/mL). In conclusion, our observational study confirmed previous evidence of good overall tolerability and a favorable outcome for the patients after switching from IR-Tac to LCPT after liver transplantation.

Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.

Evaluation of the impact of Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on Heidelberg liver transplant cohort (HDTACRO): Study protocol for an investigator initiated, non-interventional prospective study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression has resulted in enormous improvements on liver transplantation (LTx) outcomes. However, dose adjustment and medication adherence play a key role in post-transplant treatment success. The aim of the present study is to assess the trough levels and the need for adaptation of therapeutic doses in de novo LTx patients treated with Tacrolimus in the clinical routine, without any intervention to the treatment regimen.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a pilot, prospective, exploratory, monocentric, non-interventional and non-randomized investigator-initiated study. Prospectively maintained data of 100 patients treated with various oral Tacrolimus-based immunosuppressants (Prograf or Envarsus) will be analyzed. The number of required dose adjustments of Tacrolimus formulations used in clinical routine for achieving the target trough level, Tacrolimus trough level, Tacrolimus dosing, concentration/dose ratio, routine laboratory tests, efficacy data (incl. survival, acute rejection, re-transplantation), patients therapy adherence, and infections requiring the need to reduce individual immunosuppressant dosing will be evaluated for each patient.

RESULT

This study will evaluate the trough levels and the need for adaptation of therapeutic doses in de novo LTx patients treated with Tacrolimus in the clinical routine, without any intervention to the treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

The HDTACRO study will be the first study to systematically and prospectively evaluate various oral Tacrolimus-based immunosuppressants in de novo liver transplanted patients. If a difference between the therapy-subgroups is evident at the end of the trial, a randomized control trial will eventually be designed. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04444817.

Effect of Concentration/Dose Ratio in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving LCP-Tacrolimus or Immediate-Release Tacrolimus: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Background

A previous phase 3 clinical trial in de novo adult kidney transplant recipients (NCT01187953) compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). However, whether the rate of tacrolimus metabolism affects outcomes between LCPT and IR-Tac was not examined.

Material/Methods

Patients were initiated on 0.17 mg/kg/day LCPT or 0.1 mg/kg/day IR-Tac, with doses adjusted over time to maintain target therapeutic trough concentrations. This post hoc analysis examined dosing trends, relative efficacy, and safety of LCPT (n=247) and IR-Tac (n=249) in slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolizers as defined by concentration/dose ratios at day 30.

Results

For all metabolizer subgroups, minimum target tacrolimus trough concentrations were obtained more rapidly with LCPT than with IR-Tac. Slow metabolizers were more likely to exceed target trough concentrations with LCPT, while rapid metabolizers were more likely to fall below target trough concentrations with IR-Tac. Regardless of metabolizer status, significant differences were not detected between LCPT and IR-Tac for treatment failure, death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Although within metabolizer subgroups, attainment of target trough concentrations in the first week differed between LCPT and IR-Tac, these results suggest that, regardless of metabolizer phenotype, clinical outcomes do not differ between these formulations when dose adjustments are made.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01187953

The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Extended release LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) allows once-daily dosing in transplant recipients. The improved bioavailability may be beneficial for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients (SPK).

METHODS

This is a study of 39 SPK recipients on standard immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC, n = 21) or LCPT (n = 18). Coefficient of variability (CV = 100∗standard deviation/mean) was calculated to assess drug levels. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), tacrolimus and creatinine levels were measured postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no difference in tacrolimus CV in the IR-TAC and LCPT groups at 1 month or 3 months postoperatively; however, a greater difference was observed at 1 year (41.0 vs. 33.1%; p = 0.19). There were six episodes of acute rejection in the IR-TAC group compared to zero episodes in the LCPT group (p = 0.01). HbA1c was significantly higher in the IR-TAC group compared to LCPT at 3 (5.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01), 6 (5.6 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01) and 12 months (5.8 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly lower rates of rejection were observed in patients receiving LCPT. The once daily dosing may facilitate medication adherence and result in improved long-term outcomes.

Optimization of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: New pharmacokinetic perspectives

Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation (KT), but its use is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index and high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. There are three available oral formulations of tacrolimus: immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) and a MeltDose® (LCPT) formulation, the latter favoring a prolonged drug release and increased bioavailability. The time-concentration curves of these formulations are different. Compared with IR-Tac and ER-Tac, LCPT has a relatively flat pharmacokinetic profile with less fluctuation between trough and peak exposures, and a delayed peak concentration. This translates to a more stable delivery of tacrolimus and may alleviate the risk of underexposure and allograft rejection or overexposure and toxicity. The once-daily formulation of both ER-TAC and LCPT may also offer a potential advantage on patient adherence. Fast metabolizers of tacrolimus, the elderly, and human leukocyte antigen-sensitized patients are at risk of poorer outcomes after KT, possibly associated with a different exhibited pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus or different requirements in terms of exposure. Simple, practical strategies are needed to identify patients at risk of suboptimal KT outcomes and those who would benefit from a more proactively personalized approach to tacrolimus treatment. This review aims to increase awareness of the link between the pharmacokinetics of oral tacrolimus formulations and the clinical needs of patients after KT, particularly among those who have clinically significant pharmacokinetic variation of tacrolimus.