1
|
Naesens M, Roufosse C, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Adam BA, Aubert O, Böhmig GA, Callemeyn J, Clahsen-van Groningen M, Cornell LD, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Halloran P, Hidalgo LG, Horsfield C, Huang E, Kikić Ž, Kozakowski N, Nankivell B, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Schinstock C, Solez K, Tambur AR, Thaunat O, Wiebe C, Zielinski D, Colvin R, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:338-349. [PMID: 38032300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Benjamin A Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marian Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Halloran
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, USA
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Brian Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Dina Zielinski
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Robert Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roufosse C, Becker JU, Rabant M, Seron D, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Diekmann F, Glotz D, Hilbrands L, Loupy A, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, Naesens M. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10140. [PMID: 35669973 PMCID: PMC9163810 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Ulrich Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Seron
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cabezas L, Jouve T, Malvezzi P, Janbon B, Giovannini D, Rostaing L, Noble J. Tocilizumab and Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Literature Review. Front Immunol 2022; 13:839380. [PMID: 35493469 PMCID: PMC9047937 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.839380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public-health problem that increases the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular diseases, and other complications. Kidney transplantation is a renal-replacement therapy that offers better survival compared to dialysis. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a significant complication following kidney transplantation: it contributes to both short- and long-term injury. The standard-of-care (SOC) therapy combines plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIg) with or without steroids, with or without rituximab: however, despite this combined treatment, ABMR remains the main cause of graft loss. IL-6 is a key cytokine: it regulates inflammation, and the development, maturation, and activation of T cells, B cells, and plasma cells. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the main humanized monoclonal aimed at IL-6R and appears to be a safe and possible strategy to manage ABMR in sensitized recipients. We conducted a literature review to assess the place of the anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody TCZ within ABMR protocols. Materials and Methods We systematically reviewed the PubMed literature and reviewed six studies that included 117 patients and collected data on the utilization of TCZ to treat ABMR. Results Most studies report a significant reduction in levels of Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs) and reduced inflammation and microvascular lesions (as found in biopsies). Stabilization of the renal function was observed. Adverse events were light to moderate, and mortality was not linked with TCZ treatment. The main side effect noted was infection, but infections did not occur more frequently in patients receiving TCZ as compared to those receiving SOC therapy. Conclusion TCZ may be an alternative to SOC for ABMR kidney-transplant patients, either as a first-line treatment or after failure of SOC. Further randomized and controlled studies are needed to support these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Cabezas
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Benedicte Janbon
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Diane Giovannini
- University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Pathology Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- *Correspondence: Lionel Rostaing,
| | - Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nankivell BJ, P’Ng CH, Shingde M. Glomerular C4d Immunoperoxidase in Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1594-1607. [PMID: 35812271 PMCID: PMC9263257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The diagnosis of late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is compromised by frequent absence of C4d in peritubular capillaries (C4dptc), termed “C4d-negative” AMR. We hypothesized that glomerular capillary C4d (C4dglom) reflected endothelial interaction with antibody and could improve immunologic classification of transplant glomerulopathy (TG). Methods We evaluated C4d using immunoperoxidase in 3524 consecutive, kidney transplant biopsies from a single center. Results C4dglom was detected in 16.5% and C4dptc in 9.9% of biopsies. C4dglom occurred in 60.3% of TG (n = 174) and was absent in normal glomeruli. Epidemiologic risk factors for C4dglom were younger, female, living-donor recipients with early AMR, prior treated rejection, and late presentation using multivariable analysis. Semiquantitative C4dglom score correlated with donor specific antibody (DSA) level, C4dptc, microvascular inflammation (MVI), Banff cg scores, renal dysfunction, and proteinuria. Principal component analysis colocalized C4dglom with histologic AMR. Multivariable analysis of TG found DSA, C4dptc, and post-transplant time associated with C4dglom. Addition of C4dglom into Banff chronic AMR schema improved its diagnostic sensitivity for TG (verified by electron microscopy [EM]) from 22.2% to 82.4% and accuracy from 59.6% to 93.9%, compared with Banff 2019 using only C4dptc. Tissue C4dglom and chronic AMR diagnosis incorporating C4dglom were associated with death-censored allograft failure in TG (P < 0.001), independent of the severity of glomerulopathy and chronic interstitial fibrosis. Conclusion C4dglom is a promising diagnostic biomarker of endothelial interaction with antibody which substantially improved test performance of the Banff schema to correctly classify TG by pathophysiology and prognosticate graft loss. We recommend routine C4d immunoperoxidase to minimize underdiagnosis of late AMR in TG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J. Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Correspondence: Brian J. Nankivell, Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, 2145 New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Chow H. P’Ng
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meena Shingde
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loupy A, Mengel M, Haas M. 30 years of the International Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology: The Past, Present and Future of Kidney Transplant Diagnostics. Kidney Int 2021; 101:678-691. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
6
|
Preka E, Sekar T, Lopez Garcia SC, Shaw O, Kessaris N, Mamode N, Stojanovic J, Sebire NJ, Kim JJ, Marks SD. Outcomes of paediatric kidney transplant recipients using the updated 2013/2017 Banff histopathological classification for antibody-mediated rejection. Pediatr Nephrol 2021; 36:2575-2585. [PMID: 34143297 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05103-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the major changes with regard to acute and chronic ABMR in the Banff classification initiated in 2013, there has been an improvement in diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in adult studies but no data have been published in the paediatric population. METHODS We assessed 56 paediatric kidney transplant biopsies due to kidney dysfunction in patients with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in a retrospective single-centre study between January 2006 and March 2012. The results were compared with 2003/2007 Banff classification noting the subsequent 2017 and 2019 modifications do not change the 2013 Banff classification with regard to acute antibody-mediated rejection (apart from the addition of gene transcripts/classifiers that do not affect our analysis). RESULTS Following the 2013 Banff classification, there were seven cases (12.5%) diagnosed with ABMR that would have been misclassified when applying the 2003/2007 classification. Evaluating the histological features of all ABMR-related cases, we report the importance of v- (intimal arteritis) and t- (tubulitis) lesions: absence of v- and t- lesions in the biopsy is related to significantly higher kidney allograft survival (OR 7.3, 95%CI 1.1-48.8, p = 0.03 and OR 5.3, 95%CI 1.2-25.5, p = 0.04 respectively). Moreover, absence of t- lesions was associated with significantly fewer rejection episodes the year after the initial biopsy (OR 5.1, 95%CI 1.4-19.8, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports that the updated 2013 Banff classification shows superior clinicopathological correlation in identifying ABMR in paediatric kidney transplant recipients. Our results can be extrapolated to the recently updated 2019 Banff classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgenia Preka
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Southampton University Children's Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Thivya Sekar
- Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sergio C Lopez Garcia
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Olivia Shaw
- Viapath Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jelena Stojanovic
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil J Sebire
- Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Jon Jin Kim
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephen D Marks
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Callemeyn J, Ameye H, Lerut E, Senev A, Coemans M, Van Loon E, Sprangers B, Van Sandt V, Rabeyrin M, Dubois V, Thaunat O, Kuypers D, Emonds MP, Naesens M. Revisiting the changes in the Banff classification for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2413-2423. [PMID: 33382185 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff classification for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has undergone important changes, mainly by inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR in Banff'13 and elimination of suspicious ABMR (sABMR) with the use of C4d as surrogate for HLA-DSA in Banff'17. We aimed to evaluate the numerical and prognostic repercussions of these changes in a single-center cohort study of 949 single kidney transplantations, comprising 3662 biopsies that were classified according to the different versions of the Banff classification. Overall, the number of ABMR and sABMR cases increased from Banff'01 to Banff'13. In Banff'17, 248 of 292 sABMR biopsies were reclassified to No ABMR, and 44 of 292 to ABMR. However, reclassified sABMR biopsies had worse and better outcome than No ABMR and ABMR, which was mainly driven by the presence of microvascular inflammation and absence of HLA-DSA, respectively. Consequently, the discriminative performance for allograft failure was lowest in Banff'17, and highest in Banff'13. Our data suggest that the clinical and histological heterogeneity of ABMR is inadequately represented in a binary classification system. This study provides a framework to evaluate the updates of the Banff classification and assess the impact of proposed changes on the number of cases and risk stratification. Two alternative classifications introducing an intermediate category are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heleen Ameye
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Lerut
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vicky Van Sandt
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maud Rabeyrin
- Department of Pathology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - Valérie Dubois
- French National Blood Service (EFS), HLA Laboratory, Décines-Charpieu, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Medical Research (Inserm) Unit 111, French National Institute of Health, Lyon, France.,Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The FCGR3A 158 V/V-genotype is associated with decreased survival of renal allografts with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7903. [PMID: 33846428 PMCID: PMC8041758 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86943-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cells express the Fc-gamma receptor CD16 (FCGR3A) and could therefore mediate renal endothelial cell damage in cases of chronic-active antibody mediated rejection (c-aABMR). The V/V-genotype of the FCGR3A 158 F/V polymorphism is associated with increased CD16 expression and cytotoxicity by NK cells. This study evaluated whether this genotype is associated with the diagnosis of c-aABMR and renal allograft loss. The distribution of the FGCR3A 158 F/V-genotypes was not different for c-aABMR cases (N = 133) compared to control kidney transplant recipients (N = 116, P = 0.65). The V-allele was associated with increased median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD16 by NK cells (MFI 3.5 × 104 versus 1.3 × 104 for V/V and F/F-genotype, P < 0.001). Increased expression of CD16 correlated with CD16-dependent degranulation of NK cells (R = 0.4; P = 0.02). Moreover, the V/V-genotype was significantly associated with a higher glomerulitis score and an independent risk factor (HR 1.98; P = 0.04) for decreased allograft survival. Death-censored graft survival in c-aABMR cases at 3 years follow-up was 33% for the FCGR3A 158 V/V-genotype versus 62% for the F/F-genotype. In conclusion, the FCGR3A V/V-genotype increases CD16-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity and is associated with a higher glomerulitis score and decreased graft survival in cases with c-aABMR.
Collapse
|
9
|
Teixeira AC, Távora F, de Deus E Silva MLF, Prado RMG, de Matos Esmeraldo R, de Sandes-Freitas TV. The immunohistochemical expression of von Willebrand factor, T-cadherin, and Caveolin-1 is increased in kidney allograft biopsies with antibody-mediated injury. Clin Exp Nephrol 2020; 25:305-314. [PMID: 33242156 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-020-01994-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are only a few reports evaluating the applicability of endothelial-damage markers analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in kidney allograft samples. This study analyzed the expression of Caveolin-1 (Cav), von Willebrand factor (Vwf), and T-cadherin (Cad) in kidney biopsies and their association with antibody-mediated injury. METHODS In this retrospective study, 114 cases with antibody-mediated changes (Banff, 2020) and 72 with interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy were selected. IHC for Cav, Vwf and Cad was performed and evaluated according to their qualitative expression in peritubular capillaries. The cases were grouped according to the presence of microvascular inflammation (MVI), donor-specific antibodies (DSA), C4d positivity and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A level of significance < 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS Vwf expression was associated with MVI (p < 0.001), DSA (p = 0.016), C4d (p < 0.001) and AMR (p < 0.001), and was higher in DSA+/C4d+ cases despite MVI (p < 0.001). The expression of Cad correlated with MVI (p = 0.015), C4d (p = 0.005) and AMR (p = < 0.001). Cad was more expressed in chronic AMR compared with acute/active cases (p = 0.001). Cav expression was associated with MVI (p = 0.029) and AMR (p = 0.016) and was also higher in chronic AMR (p = 0.049). A combined score of Vwf and Cad was higher in AMR when compared with C4d without rejection and IF/TA cases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Vwf, Cad and Cav expression shows association with antibody-mediated injury and may be helpful to support AMR diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Costa Teixeira
- Medical Sciences Postgraduation Program, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Monsenhor Furtado St, s/n, Fortaleza, CE, 60430-275, Brazil. .,ARGOS Patologia, 5753 Santos Dumont av, Room 1604, Office Tower, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60175047, Brazil.
| | - Fábio Távora
- Medical Sciences Postgraduation Program, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Monsenhor Furtado St, s/n, Fortaleza, CE, 60430-275, Brazil.,ARGOS Patologia, 5753 Santos Dumont av, Room 1604, Office Tower, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60175047, Brazil
| | | | - Renan Martins Gomes Prado
- Faculty of Medicine of State University of Ceará, 1700 Silas Munguba St, Itaperi, Fortaleza, CE, 60441-750, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo de Matos Esmeraldo
- Division of Transplantation, General Hospital of Fortaleza, 900 Ávila Goulart St, Papicu, Fortaleza, CE, 60165-160, Brazil
| | - Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas
- Medical Sciences Postgraduation Program, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Monsenhor Furtado St, s/n, Fortaleza, CE, 60430-275, Brazil.,Division of Transplantation, General Hospital of Fortaleza, 900 Ávila Goulart St, Papicu, Fortaleza, CE, 60165-160, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loupy A, Haas M, Roufosse C, Naesens M, Adam B, Afrouzian M, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Becker JU, Cornell LD, Clahsen‐van Groningen MC, Demetris AJ, Dragun D, Duong van Huyen J, Farris AB, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Glotz D, Gueguen J, Kikic Z, Kozakowski N, Kraus E, Lefaucheur C, Liapis H, Mannon RB, Montgomery RA, Nankivell BJ, Nickeleit V, Nickerson P, Rabant M, Racusen L, Randhawa P, Robin B, Rosales IA, Sapir‐Pichhadze R, Schinstock CA, Seron D, Singh HK, Smith RN, Stegall MD, Zeevi A, Solez K, Colvin RB, Mengel M. The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2318-2331. [PMID: 32463180 PMCID: PMC7496245 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 454] [Impact Index Per Article: 113.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The XV. Banff conference for allograft pathology was held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics in Pittsburgh, PA (USA) and focused on refining recent updates to the classification, advances from the Banff working groups, and standardization of molecular diagnostics. This report on kidney transplant pathology details clarifications and refinements to the criteria for chronic active (CA) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), borderline, and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The main focus of kidney sessions was on how to address biopsies meeting criteria for CA TCMR plus borderline or acute TCMR. Recent studies on the clinical impact of borderline infiltrates were also presented to clarify whether the threshold for interstitial inflammation in diagnosis of borderline should be i0 or i1. Sessions on ABMR focused on biopsies showing microvascular inflammation in the absence of C4d staining or detectable donor-specific antibodies; the potential value of molecular diagnostics in such cases and recommendations for use of the latter in the setting of solid organ transplantation are presented in the accompanying meeting report. Finally, several speakers discussed the capabilities of artificial intelligence and the potential for use of machine learning algorithms in diagnosis and personalized therapeutics in solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hassler J, Tanriover B, Ariyamutu V, Burguete D, Hendricks AR, Torrealba JR. 2013 Banff Criteria for Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection Are Superior to 2007 Banff Criteria in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Renal Allograft Outcomes. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:1791-1795. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
12
|
Senev A, Coemans M, Lerut E, Van Sandt V, Daniëls L, Kuypers D, Sprangers B, Emonds MP, Naesens M. Histological picture of antibody-mediated rejection without donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies: Clinical presentation and implications for outcome. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:763-780. [PMID: 30107078 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
In this cohort study (n = 935 transplantations), we investigated the phenotype and risk of graft failure in patients with histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the absence of circulating donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA), and compared this to patients with definite ABMR and HLA-DSA-positivity. The histological picture did not differ between HLA-DSA-positive (n = 85) and HLA-DSA-negative (n = 123) cases of ABMR histology, apart from increased complement split product 4d (C4d) deposition in the peritubular capillaries in HLA-DSA-positive cases. Histology of ABMR without HLA-DSA was more transient than DSA-positive ABMR, and patients with ABMR histology without HLA-DSA had graft survival superior to that of HLA-DSA-positive patients, independent of concomitant T cell-mediated rejection (38.2%) or borderline changes (17.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of graft failure was not higher in patients with histological picture of ABMR (ABMRh ) in the absence of HLA-DSA, compared to patients without ABMRh . Despite an association between C4d deposition and HLA-DSA-positivity, using C4d deposition as alternative for the DSA criterion in the diagnosis of ABMR, as proposed in Banff 2017, did not contribute to the prognosis of graft function and graft failure. We concluded that biopsies with ABMRh but without detectable HLA-DSA represent a distinct, often transient phenotype with superior allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Senev
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Lerut
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vicky Van Sandt
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth Daniëls
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Solar-Cafaggi D, Marino L, Uribe-Uribe N, Morales-Buenrostro LE. Antibody-mediated rejection in the Banff classifications of 2007 and 2017: A comparison of renal graft loss prediction capability. Transpl Immunol 2018; 51:40-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
14
|
Clinical significance of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in deceased donors for prediction of post-transplant clinical outcomes: A multicenter cohort study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205011. [PMID: 30289927 PMCID: PMC6173429 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated whether the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) system is useful in predicting clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Methods Four hundred sixty-nine kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving kidneys from 359 deceased donors were included in this study, which involved three transplant centers. KTRs were divided into high and low KDPI KTR groups based on the median KDPI score of 67%. We compared clinical outcomes between the high KDPI and low KDPI groups. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection between high and low KDPI KTR groups. In comparison with histologic findings in allograft tissues obtained within three months from KT, the proportion of glomerulosclerosis was significantly higher in the high KDPI KTR group than in the low KDPI KTR group. With Kaplan-Meier analysis, the graft survival rate was significantly lower in the high KDPI KTR group than in the low KDPI KTR group (Log rank, P = 0.017), and multivariate analysis also demonstrated that a high KDPI score was a significant risk factor for death censored allograft failure (HR 2.62, 95% CI, 1.29–5.33, P = 0.008). Conclusion The KDPI scoring system is useful in predicting allograft outcomes in a Korean DDKT cohort.
Collapse
|
15
|
Evolving criteria for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2018; 27:137-143. [DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
16
|
Fatal Pneumococcus Sepsis after Treatment of Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection. Case Rep Nephrol 2018; 2018:1415450. [PMID: 29682370 PMCID: PMC5851299 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1415450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of late renal allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Risks and benefits of treatment of late ABMR have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We report on a 35-year-old patient with deterioration in renal function and progressive proteinuria 15 years after transplantation. Recurrent infections after a splenectomy following traumatic splenic rupture 3 years earlier had led to reduction of immunosuppression. Renal transplant biopsy showed glomerular double contours, 40% fibrosis/tubular atrophy, peritubular capillaritis, and positive C4d staining indicating chronic-active ABMR. ABMR treatment was initiated with steroids, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. Fourteen days later, she presented to the emergency department with fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and hypotension. Despite antibiotic treatment she deteriorated with progressive hypotension, capillary leak with pleural effusion, peripheral edema, and progressive respiratory insufficiency. She died due to septic shock five days after admission. Blood cultures showed Streptococcus pneumoniae, consistent with a diagnosis of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection syndrome, despite protective pneumococcus vaccination titers. We assume that the infection was caused by one of the strains not covered by the Pneumovax 23 vaccination. The increased immunosuppression with B cell depletion may have contributed to the overwhelming course of this infection.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sablik KA, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Looman CWN, Damman J, Roelen DL, van Agteren M, Betjes MGH. Chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection with or without donor-specific antibodies has similar histomorphology and clinical outcome - a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2018; 31:900-908. [PMID: 29570868 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is defined as histological evidence of chronic endothelial injury (cg), also known as transplant glomerulopathy, and either microvascular inflammation (MVI) or positivity for C4d. Importantly, the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is currently still mandatory for the diagnosis of c-aABMR. This retrospective study of 41 c-aABMR patients investigates whether cases suspicious for c-aABMR (DSA negative, n = 24) differ from cases of c-aABMR (DSA positive, n = 17) with respect to renal histology, allograft function and long-term graft survival. All included patients had progressive loss of allograft function and were diagnosed by for cause biopsy and scored according to the Banff '15 criteria. In all DSApos cases, DSA were de novo and the majority was directed against HLA-II being mostly anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics, decline in allograft function and renal allograft survival in cases with or without DSAs. All cases showed chronic histomorphological damage and inflammation, irrespective of the presence of DSA. Renal histology and clinical outcome of patients suspicious for c-aABMR (DSAneg) do not significantly differ from patients with a diagnosis of c-aABMR (DSApos). We believe that our study adds to the ongoing debate regarding the need for DSAs to be present for the diagnosis of c-aABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasia A Sablik
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caspar W N Looman
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Damman
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Agteren
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Transplant glomerulopathy. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:235-252. [PMID: 29027535 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the renal allograft, transplant glomerulopathy represents a morphologic lesion and not a specific diagnosis. The hallmark pathologic feature is glomerular basement membrane reduplication by light microscopy or electron microscopy in the absence of immune complex deposits. Transplant glomerulopathy results from chronic, recurring endothelial cell injury that can be mediated by HLA alloantibodies (donor-specific antibodies), various autoantibodies, cell-mediated immune injury, thrombotic microangiopathy, or chronic hepatitis C. Clinically, transplant glomerulopathy may be silent, detectable on protocol biopsy, or present with overt manifestations, including up to nephrotic range proteinuria, hypertension, and declining glomerular filtration rate. In either case, transplant glomerulopathy is associated with reduced graft survival. This review details the morphologic features of transplant glomerulopathy found on light microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, and electron microscopy. The pathophysiology of the causes and risk factors are discussed. Clinical manifestations are emphasized and potential therapeutic modalities are examined.
Collapse
|
19
|
Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Roufosse C, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Halloran PF, Colvin RB, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Bouatou Y, Becker JU, Cornell LD, van Huyen JPD, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Mannon RB, Naesens M, Nickeleit V, Nickerson P, Segev DL, Singh HK, Stegall M, Randhawa P, Racusen L, Solez K, Mengel M. The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:293-307. [PMID: 29243394 PMCID: PMC5817248 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 739] [Impact Index Per Article: 123.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The kidney sessions of the 2017 Banff Conference focused on 2 areas: clinical implications of inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (i-IFTA) and its relationship to T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and the continued evolution of molecular diagnostics, particularly in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In confirmation of previous studies, it was independently demonstrated by 2 groups that i-IFTA is associated with reduced graft survival. Furthermore, these groups presented that i-IFTA, particularly when involving >25% of sclerotic cortex in association with tubulitis, is often a sequela of acute TCMR in association with underimmunosuppression. The classification was thus revised to include moderate i-IFTA plus moderate or severe tubulitis as diagnostic of chronic active TCMR. Other studies demonstrated that certain molecular classifiers improve diagnosis of ABMR beyond what is possible with histology, C4d, and detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and that both C4d and validated molecular assays can serve as potential alternatives and/or complements to DSAs in the diagnosis of ABMR. The Banff ABMR criteria are thus updated to include these alternatives. Finally, the present report paves the way for the Banff scheme to be part of an integrative approach for defining surrogate endpoints in next-generation clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - A. Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - C. Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation and Department of Nephrology and TransplantationHopital Saint LouisUniversité Paris VII and INSERM U 1160ParisFrance
| | - C. Roufosse
- Department of MedicineImperial College London and North West London PathologyLondonUK
| | - D. Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation and Department of Nephrology and TransplantationHopital Saint LouisUniversité Paris VII and INSERM U 1160ParisFrance
| | - D. Seron
- Nephrology DepartmentHospital Vall d'HebronAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - B. J. Nankivell
- Department of Renal MedicineWestmead HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - P. F. Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics CentreUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - R. B. Colvin
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Montefiore‐Einstein Center for TransplantationMontefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
| | - N. Alachkar
- Department of MedicineSection of NephrologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - S. Bagnasco
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Y. Bouatou
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance,Division of NephrologyDepartment of Medical SpecialitiesGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
| | - J. U. Becker
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
| | - L. D. Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - J. P. Duong van Huyen
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - I. W. Gibson
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Edward S. Kraus
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - R. B. Mannon
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Alabama School of MedicineBirminghamALUSA
| | - M. Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of Leuven & Department of NephrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - V. Nickeleit
- Division of NephropathologyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillNCUSA
| | - P. Nickerson
- Department of Internal Medicine and ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - D. L. Segev
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - H. K. Singh
- Division of NephropathologyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillNCUSA
| | - M. Stegall
- Departments of Surgery and ImmunologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - P. Randhawa
- Division of Transplantation PathologyThomas E. Starzl Transplantation InstituteUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPAUSA
| | - L. Racusen
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - K. Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| | - M. Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Choi J, Aubert O, Vo A, Loupy A, Haas M, Puliyanda D, Kim I, Louie S, Kang A, Peng A, Kahwaji J, Reinsmoen N, Toyoda M, Jordan SC. Assessment of Tocilizumab (Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Monoclonal) as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy in HLA-Sensitized Renal Allograft Recipients. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2381-2389. [PMID: 28199785 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Extending the functional integrity of renal allografts is the primary goal of transplant medicine. The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) posttransplantation leads to chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) and transplant glomerulopathy (TG), resulting in the majority of graft losses that occur in the United States. This reduces the quality and length of life for patients and increases cost. There are no approved treatments for cAMR. Evidence suggests the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) may play an important role in DSA generation and cAMR. We identified 36 renal transplant patients with cAMR plus DSAs and TG who failed standard of care treatment with IVIg plus rituximab with or without plasma exchange. Patients were offered rescue therapy with the anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal tocilizumab with monthly infusions and monitored for DSAs and long-term outcomes. Tocilizumab-treated patients demonstrated graft survival and patient survival rates of 80% and 91% at 6 years, respectively. Significant reductions in DSAs and stabilization of renal function were seen at 2 years. No significant adverse events or severe adverse events were seen. Tocilizumab provides good long-term outcomes for patients with cAMR and TG, especially compared with historical published treatments. Inhibition of the IL-6-IL-6 receptor pathway may represent a novel approach to stabilize allograft function and extend patient lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - O Aubert
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM U970, Biostatistics Department, Paris, France
| | - A Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM U970, Biostatistics Department, Paris, France
| | - M Haas
- Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - D Puliyanda
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - I Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Louie
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Kang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Peng
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J Kahwaji
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - N Reinsmoen
- Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Toyoda
- HLA Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Antibody-mediated rejection in the cardiac allograft: diagnosis, treatment and future considerations. Curr Opin Cardiol 2017; 32:326-335. [PMID: 28212151 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the latest publications dealing with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and defines areas of controversy and future steps that may improve the outcome for patients with this virulent form of rejection. RECENT FINDINGS Recent progress includes publication of standardized pathologic criteria for acute AMR by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and guidelines for treatment of acute AMR by the American Heart Association, endorsed by ISHLT as well. Recently published review articles emphasize the important role of innate immune mechanisms, clarify the role of viral infection and provide insights into vascular biology and the role of innate effector populations, macrophages and dendritic cells. SUMMARY Strategies for future studies are discussed in the context of these new findings and similar efforts undertaken by renal and liver allograft investigators.
Collapse
|
22
|
Acute Rejection Phenotypes in the Current Era of Immunosuppression: A Single-Center Analysis. Transplant Direct 2017; 3:e136. [PMID: 28361120 PMCID: PMC5367753 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Besides ‘definitive rejection’, the Banff classification includes categories for ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and phenotypes of rejection episodes in 316 consecutive renal transplants from 2009 to 2014 grouped into patients without/with pretransplant HLA-DSA (ptDSAneg, n = 251; ptDSApos, n = 65). Methods All adequate indication (n = 125) and surveillance biopsies (n = 538) performed within the first year posttransplant were classified according to the current Banff criteria. Results ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were 3 times more common than ‘definitive rejection’ phenotypes in biopsies from ptDSAneg patients (35% vs 11%) and equally common in biopsies from ptDSApos patients (25% vs 27%). In both groups, ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes were more frequent in surveillance than in indication biopsies (28% vs 16% in ptDSAneg patients, and 37% vs 29% in ptDSApos patients). ‘Borderline changes: ‘Suspicious' for acute T-cell mediated rejection’ (91%) were the dominant ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotype in ptDSAneg patients, whereas ‘borderline changes’ (58%) and ‘suspicious for acute/active antibody-mediated rejection’ (42%) were equally frequent in biopsies from ptDSApos patients. Inclusion of ‘suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes increased the 1-year incidence of clinical (ptDSAneg patients: 18% vs 8%, P = 0.0005; ptDSApos patients: 24% vs 18%, P = 0.31) and (sub)clinical rejection (ptDSAneg patients: 59% vs 22%, P < 0.0001; ptDSApos patients: 68% vs 40%, P = 0.004). Conclusions ‘Suspicious for rejection’ phenotypes are very common in the current era and outnumber the frequency of ‘definitive rejection’ within the first year posttransplant.
Collapse
|
23
|
Haas M. The Revised (2013) Banff Classification for Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts: Update, Difficulties, and Future Considerations. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:1352-7. [PMID: 26696524 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 12/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The Banff 2013 classification (Banff 2013) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal allografts represents the first major revision of the original Banff classification for ABMR that was published in 2003. The main impetus for this revision was the need to include C4d-negative ABMR, although this revised classification contains a number of additional features based on findings reported from 2007 to 2013. Since its publication, several studies have examined the validity of different aspects of Banff 2013 and compared it to earlier (2003, 2007) versions of the Banff ABMR classification. Recent evidence, albeit limited, indicates that Banff 2013 represents an improvement over the previous versions, enhancing our ability to accurately diagnose cases of acute/active and chronic active ABMR on renal allograft biopsy. Molecular studies appear to justify the threshold value of glomerulitis plus peritubular capillaritis score ≥2 required by Banff 2013 for the diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR; however, other aspects of the classification, including its overall interobserver reproducibility, the clinical significance of the category of C4d staining without evidence of rejection, and whether surrogate markers might potentially substitute for the requirement for the presence of donor-specific antibodies, require additional investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|