1
|
Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Roufosse C, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Halloran PF, Colvin RB, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Bouatou Y, Becker JU, Cornell LD, van Huyen JPD, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Mannon RB, Naesens M, Nickeleit V, Nickerson P, Segev DL, Singh HK, Stegall M, Randhawa P, Racusen L, Solez K, Mengel M. The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:293-307. [PMID: 29243394 PMCID: PMC5817248 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 713] [Impact Index Per Article: 118.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The kidney sessions of the 2017 Banff Conference focused on 2 areas: clinical implications of inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (i-IFTA) and its relationship to T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and the continued evolution of molecular diagnostics, particularly in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In confirmation of previous studies, it was independently demonstrated by 2 groups that i-IFTA is associated with reduced graft survival. Furthermore, these groups presented that i-IFTA, particularly when involving >25% of sclerotic cortex in association with tubulitis, is often a sequela of acute TCMR in association with underimmunosuppression. The classification was thus revised to include moderate i-IFTA plus moderate or severe tubulitis as diagnostic of chronic active TCMR. Other studies demonstrated that certain molecular classifiers improve diagnosis of ABMR beyond what is possible with histology, C4d, and detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and that both C4d and validated molecular assays can serve as potential alternatives and/or complements to DSAs in the diagnosis of ABMR. The Banff ABMR criteria are thus updated to include these alternatives. Finally, the present report paves the way for the Banff scheme to be part of an integrative approach for defining surrogate endpoints in next-generation clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - A. Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - C. Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation and Department of Nephrology and TransplantationHopital Saint LouisUniversité Paris VII and INSERM U 1160ParisFrance
| | - C. Roufosse
- Department of MedicineImperial College London and North West London PathologyLondonUK
| | - D. Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation and Department of Nephrology and TransplantationHopital Saint LouisUniversité Paris VII and INSERM U 1160ParisFrance
| | - D. Seron
- Nephrology DepartmentHospital Vall d'HebronAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - B. J. Nankivell
- Department of Renal MedicineWestmead HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - P. F. Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics CentreUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonAlbertaCanada
| | - R. B. Colvin
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Montefiore‐Einstein Center for TransplantationMontefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
| | - N. Alachkar
- Department of MedicineSection of NephrologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - S. Bagnasco
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Y. Bouatou
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance,Division of NephrologyDepartment of Medical SpecialitiesGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
| | - J. U. Becker
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital of CologneCologneGermany
| | - L. D. Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - J. P. Duong van Huyen
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationINSERM U970 and Necker HospitalUniversity Paris DescartesParisFrance
| | - I. W. Gibson
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Edward S. Kraus
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - R. B. Mannon
- Division of NephrologyDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Alabama School of MedicineBirminghamALUSA
| | - M. Naesens
- Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of Leuven & Department of NephrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - V. Nickeleit
- Division of NephropathologyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillNCUSA
| | - P. Nickerson
- Department of Internal Medicine and ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - D. L. Segev
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - H. K. Singh
- Division of NephropathologyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillNCUSA
| | - M. Stegall
- Departments of Surgery and ImmunologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - P. Randhawa
- Division of Transplantation PathologyThomas E. Starzl Transplantation InstituteUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPAUSA
| | - L. Racusen
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - K. Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| | - M. Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loupy A, Haas M, Solez K, Racusen L, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Colvin RB, Afrouzian M, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Becker JU, Cornell L, Drachenberg C, Dragun D, de Kort H, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Lefaucheur C, Legendre C, Liapis H, Muthukumar T, Nickeleit V, Orandi B, Park W, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Reed EF, Roufosse C, Seshan SV, Sis B, Singh HK, Schinstock C, Tambur A, Zeevi A, Mengel M. The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:28-41. [PMID: 27862883 PMCID: PMC5363228 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 482] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The XIII Banff meeting, held in conjunction the Canadian Society of Transplantation in Vancouver, Canada, reviewed the clinical impact of updates of C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) from the 2013 meeting, reports from active Banff Working Groups, the relationships of donor-specific antibody tests (anti-HLA and non-HLA) with transplant histopathology, and questions of molecular transplant diagnostics. The use of transcriptome gene sets, their resultant diagnostic classifiers, or common key genes to supplement the diagnosis and classification of rejection requires further consensus agreement and validation in biopsies. Newly introduced concepts include the i-IFTA score, comprising inflammation within areas of fibrosis and atrophy and acceptance of transplant arteriolopathy within the descriptions of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) or chronic ABMR. The pattern of mixed TCMR and ABMR was increasingly recognized. This report also includes improved definitions of TCMR and ABMR in pancreas transplants with specification of vascular lesions and prospects for defining a vascularized composite allograft rejection classification. The goal of the Banff process is ongoing integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produce a consensus-based reporting system that offers precise composite scores, accurate routine diagnostics, and applicability to next-generation clinical trials.
Collapse
|
3
|
Orandi BJ, Lonze BE, Jackson A, Terezakis S, Kraus ES, Alachkar N, Bagnasco SM, Segev DL, Orens JB, Montgomery RA. Splenic Irradiation for the Treatment of Severe Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:3041-3045. [PMID: 27214874 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Patients requiring desensitization prior to renal transplantation are at risk for developing severe antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) refractory to treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (PP/IVIg). We have previously reported success at graft salvage, long-term graft survival and protection against transplant glomerulopathy with the use of eculizumab and splenectomy in addition to PP/IVIg. Splenectomy may be an important component of this combination therapy and is itself associated with a marked reduction in donor-specific antibody (DSA) production. However, splenectomy represents a major operation, and some patients with severe AMR have comorbid conditions that substantially increase their risk of complications during and after surgery. In an effort to spare recipients the morbidity of a second operation, we used splenic irradiation in lieu of splenectomy in two incompatible live donor kidney transplant recipients with severe AMR in addition to PP/IVIg, rituximab and eculizumab. This novel approach to the treatment of severe AMR was associated with allograft salvage, excellent graft function and no short- or medium-term adverse effects of the radiation therapy. One-year surveillance biopsies did not show transplant glomerulopathy (tg) on light microscopy, but microcirculation inflammation and tg were present on electron microscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J Orandi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - B E Lonze
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - E S Kraus
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - N Alachkar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - S M Bagnasco
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - D L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - J B Orens
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - R A Montgomery
- New York University (NYU) Langone Transplant Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nijim S, Vujjini V, Alasfar S, Luo X, Orandi B, Delp C, Desai N, Montgomery R, Lonze B, Alachkar N. Recurrent IgA Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:2689-2694. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
5
|
Latt NL, Araz F, Alachkar N, Durand CM, Gurakar A. Management of hepatitis C infection among patients with renal failure. MINERVA GASTROENTERO 2015; 61:39-49. [PMID: 25390288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a rising global public health burden with an estimated 130-150 million infected people worldwide and 350,000 to 500,000 HCV-related deaths each year. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also a highly prevalent public health issue as the escalating numbers of patients worldwide are developing type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension due to high fat diets and a growing obesity epidemic. The high incidence and prevalence of HCV infection leads to substantial morbidity and mortality among renal dialysis patients. Recommendations are to screen for HCV infection among all patients with renal failure especially prior to initiation of hemodialysis and renal transplant evaluation. HCV-antibody enzyme immunoassay (EIA) followed by confirmation with HCV RNA nucleic acid test (NAT) is recommended for low prevalence regions, but in dialysis centers with a high prevalence of HCV, initial testing with NAT is recommended due to higher false positive EIA rates. Liver biopsy is used to assess of liver disease severity. Transjugular liver biopsy, as an effective and safe technique in patients with ESRD can be considered instead of percutaneous approach. Non-invasive approaches to staging fibrosis, including liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography and panels of serum fibrosis biomarkers, are also widely used. Although difficult to manage, combined pegylated- interferon (PEG IFN) and ribavirin therapy was the only treatment modality available for HCV-positive patients until the recently introduced new direct-acting antiviral agents. However, except boceprevir, there are no currently available data to suggest that these new anti-viral drugs are safe and effective among end-stage renal failure patients. IFN-containing regimens were also associated with high rates of renal graft loss in post-renal transplant patients. Therefore, management of HCV infection in renal failure patients is unique and should be tailored individually with calculated risk/benefit ratio. New studies are immediately warranted to determine the safety profile and efficacy of newer anti-HCV drugs not only in patients with end-stage renal failure prior to kidney transplantation but also among kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N L Latt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles, CA, USA -
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
McAdams-DeMarco MA, Law A, King E, Orandi B, Salter M, Gupta N, Chow E, Alachkar N, Desai N, Varadhan R, Walston J, Segev DL. Frailty and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:149-54. [PMID: 25359393 PMCID: PMC4332809 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 235] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Revised: 08/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We have previously described strong associations between frailty, a measure of physiologic reserve initially described and validated in geriatrics, and early hospital readmission as well as delayed graft function. The goal of this study was to estimate its association with postkidney transplantation (post-KT) mortality. Frailty was prospectively measured in 537 KT recipients at the time of transplantation between November 2008 and August 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for confounders using a novel approach to substantially improve model efficiency and generalizability in single-center studies. We precisely estimated the confounder coefficients using the large sample size of the Scientific Registry of Transplantation Recipients (n = 37 858) and introduced these into the single-center model, which then estimated the adjusted frailty coefficient. At 5 years, the survivals were 91.5%, 86.0% and 77.5% for nonfrail, intermediately frail and frail KT recipients, respectively. Frailty was independently associated with a 2.17-fold (95% CI: 1.01-4.65, p = 0.047) higher risk of death. In conclusion, regardless of age, frailty is a strong, independent risk factor for post-KT mortality, even after carefully adjusting for many confounders using a novel, efficient statistical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. A. McAdams-DeMarco
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD,Corresponding authors: Dorry L. Segev, and Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco,
| | - A. Law
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - E. King
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - B. Orandi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - M. Salter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - N. Gupta
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - E. Chow
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - N. Alachkar
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - N. Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - R. Varadhan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - J. Walston
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - D. L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD,Corresponding authors: Dorry L. Segev, and Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Live kidney donor transplantation across immunological barriers, either blood group or positive crossmatch [ABO- and human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation, respectively], is now practised widely across many transplant centres. This provides transplantation opportunities to patients that hitherto would have been deemed contra-indicated and would subsequently have waited indefinitely for a suitably matched kidney. Protocols have evolved with time as experience has grown and now a variety of desensitization strategies are currently practised to overcome such immunological barriers. In addition, desensitization protocols are complemented by kidney paired donation exchange schemes and therefore incompatible patients now have strategies to either confront or bypass immunological barriers, respectively. As the field expands it is clear that non-transplant clinicians will be exposed to incompatible kidney transplant recipients outside of experienced centres. It is therefore timely to review the evolution of practice that have led to current desensitization modalities, contrast protocols and outcomes of current regimens and speculate on future direction of incompatible kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sharif
- Renal Institute of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharif A, Lonze B, Hillier J, Zachary A, Leffell M, Alachkar N, Kraus E, Dagher N, Desai N, Segev D, Montgomery R. Outcomes from Combining Kidney Paired Donation and Desensitization: An Approach to Kidney Transplantation for the Most Highly Sensitized Patients. Transplantation 2012. [DOI: 10.1097/00007890-201211271-00151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Delville M, Sigdel T, Li L, Canaud G, Naessens M, Jackson A, Alachkar N, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Minnie S. Une signature IgG prédictive de la récidive de hyalinose segmentaire et focale après la transplantation. Nephrol Ther 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2012.07.320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|