Early Low Urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 Might Predict Immunological Quiescence in Clinically and Histologically Stable Kidney Recipients

Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices

INTRODUCTION

The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests.

CONCLUSION

Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.

Taurine Deficiency Is a Hallmark of Injured Kidney Allografts

BACKGROUND

Taurine is one of the most abundant amino acids in humans. Low taurine levels are associated with cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and inflammation in mouse, all of which can be reversed by supplementation. It is unknown whether taurine metabolism is associated with kidney allograft function and survival.

METHODS

We performed urine metabolomic profiling of kidney transplant recipients in the early and late phases after transplantation combined with transcriptomic analysis of human kidney allografts. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing data sets of mouse kidneys after ischemia-reperfusion injury were analyzed. We analyzed the association of urinary taurine levels and taurine metabolism genes with kidney function, histology, and graft survival.

RESULTS

Urine taurine concentrations were significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients who experienced delayed graft function. In a mouse model of ischemia-reperfusion injury, the taurine biosynthesis gene, CSAD , but not the taurine transporter SLC6A6 , was repressed. In the late stage of transplantation, low level of taurine in urine was associated with impaired kidney function and chronic structural changes. Urine taurine level in the lowest tertile was predictive of graft loss. Expression of the taurine transporter SLC6A6 in the upper median, but not CSAD , was associated with chronic kidney injury and was predictive of graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Low urine taurine level is a marker of injury in the kidney allograft, is associated with poor kidney function, is associated with chronic histological changes, and is predictive of graft survival. The differential expression of CSAD and SLC6A6 , depending on the time after transplantation and marks of injury, highlights different mechanisms affecting taurine metabolism.

Advancing kidney transplant outcomes: the role of urinary proteomics in graft function monitoring and rejection detection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation significantly improves the lives of those with end-stage kidney disease, offering best alternative to dialysis. However, transplant success is threatened by the acute and chronic rejection mechanisms due to complex immune responses against the new organ.

AREAS COVERED

The ongoing research into biomarkers holds promise for revolutionizing the early detection and monitoring of the graft health. Liquid biopsy techniques offer a new avenue, with several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers showing promise in detecting and monitoring kidney diseases and an early and chronic allograft rejection.

EXPERT OPINIONS

Evaluating the protein composition related to kidney transplant results could lead to identifying biomarkers that provide insights into the graft functionality. Non-invasive proteomic biomarkers can drastically enhance clinical outcomes and change the way how kidney transplants are evaluated for patients and physicians if they succeed in this transition. Hence, the advancement in proteomic technologies, leads toward a significant improvement in understanding of the protein markers and molecular mechanisms linked to the outcomes of kidney transplants. However, the road from discovery to the use of such proteins in clinical practice is long, with a need for continuous validation and beyond the singular research team with comprehensive infrastructure and across research groups collaboration.

Recent Insights in Noninvasive Diagnostic for the Assessment of Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and prolongs survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, kidney transplant recipients present a higher risk for cardiovascular events compared to the general population. Risk assessment for graft failure as well as cardiovascular events is still based on invasive procedures. Biomarkers in blood and urine, but also new diagnostic approaches like genetic or molecular testing, can be useful tools to monitor graft function and to identify patients of high cardiovascular risk. Many biomarkers have been introduced, whereas most of these biomarkers have not been implemented in clinical routine. Here, we discuss recent developments in biomarkers and diagnostic models in kidney transplant recipients. Because many factors impact graft function and cardiovascular risk, it is most likely that no biomarker will meet the highest demands and standards. We advocate to shift focus to the identification of patients benefitting from molecular and genetic testing as well as from analysis of more specific biomarkers instead of finding one biomarker fitting to all patients.

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

Automated Urinary Chemokine Assays for Noninvasive Detection of Kidney Transplant Rejection: A Prospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Prior studies have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of urinary chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 for kidney transplant rejection. However, their benefit in addition to clinical information has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the diagnostic performance for detecting acute rejection of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 when integrated with clinical information.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed 1,559 biopsy-paired urinary samples from 622 kidney transplants performed between April 2013 and July 2019 at a single transplant center in Belgium. External validation was performed in 986 biopsy-paired urinary samples.

TESTS COMPARED

We quantified urinary CXCL9 (uCXCL9) and CXCL10 (uCXCL10) using an automated immunoassay platform and normalized the values to urinary creatinine. Urinary chemokines were incorporated into a multivariable model with routine clinical markers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor-specific antibodies, and polyoma viremia) (integrated model). This model was then compared with the tissue diagnosis according to the Banff classification for acute rejection.

OUTCOME

Acute rejection detected on kidney biopsy using the Banff classification.

RESULTS

Chemokines integrated with routine clinical markers had high diagnostic value for detection of acute rejection (n=150) (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve 81.3% [95% CI, 77.6-85.0]). The integrated model would help avoid 59 protocol biopsies per 100 patients when the risk for rejection is predicted to be below 10%. The performance of the integrated model was similar in the external validation cohort.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional nature obviates investigating the evolution over time and prediction of future rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an integrated model of urinary chemokines and clinical markers for noninvasive monitoring of rejection could enable a reduction in the number of biopsies. Urinary chemokines may be useful noninvasive biomarkers whose use should be further studied in prospective randomized trials to clarify their role in guiding clinical care and the use of biopsies to detect rejection after kidney transplantation.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have been suggested to be good noninvasive biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection. However, defining a context of use and integration with clinical information is necessary before clinical implementation can begin. In this study, we demonstrated that urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, together with clinical information, have substantial diagnostic accuracy for the detection of acute kidney transplant rejection. Application of urinary chemokines together with clinical information may guide biopsy practices following kidney transplantation and potentially reduce the need for kidney transplant biopsies.

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate.

SUMMARY

Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.

European Society of Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Testing for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection

To address the need for improved biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection, European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated working group comprised of experts in kidney transplant biomarkers to review literature pertaining to clinical and subclinical acute rejection to develop guidelines in the screening and diagnosis of acute rejection that were subsequently discussed and voted on during the Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the Working Group on Molecular Biomarkers of Kidney Transplant Rejection are presented in this article.

The uptake of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose by the renal allograft correlates with the acute Banff scores of cortex inflammation but not with the 1-year graft outcomes

Introduction

[18F]FDG PET/CT noninvasively disproves acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected AR. However, the correlation of biopsy-based Banff vs. PET/CT-based scores of acute inflammation remains unknown, as does the prognostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT at one year post suspected AR.

Methods

From 2012 to 2019, 114 [18F]FDG-PET/CTs were prospectively performed in 105 adult KTRs who underwent per cause transplant biopsies. Ordinal logistic regression assessed the correlation between the extent of histological inflammation and the mean standardized [18F]FDG uptake values (mSUVmean). Functional outcomes of kidney allografts were evaluated at one year post per cause biopsy and correlated to mSUVmean.

Results

A significant correlation between mSUVmean and acute Banff score was found, with an adjusted R 2 of 0.25. The mSUVmean was significantly different between subgroups of "total i", with 2.30 ± 0.71 in score 3 vs. 1.68 ± 0.24 in score 0. Neither the function nor the survival of the graft at one year was statistically related to mSUVmean.

Discussion

[18F]FDG-PET/CT may help noninvasively assess the severity of kidney allograft inflammation in KTRs with suspected AR, but it does not predict graft outcomes at one year.

Molecular immune monitoring in kidney transplant rejection: a state-of-the-art review

Although current regimens of immunosuppressive drugs are effective in renal transplant recipients, long-term renal allograft outcomes remain suboptimal. For many years, the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and of several causes of renal allograft dysfunction, such as chronic subclinical inflammation and infection, was mostly based on renal allograft biopsy, which is not only invasive but also possibly performed too late for proper management. In addition, certain allograft dysfunctions are difficult to differentiate from renal histology due to their similar pathogenesis and immune responses. As such, non-invasive assays and biomarkers may be more beneficial than conventional renal biopsy for enhancing graft survival and optimizing immunosuppressive drug regimens during long-term care. This paper discusses recent biomarker candidates, including donor-derived cell-free DNA, transcriptomics, microRNAs, exosomes (or other extracellular vesicles), urine chemokines, and nucleosomes, that show high potential for clinical use in determining the prognosis of long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation, along with their limitations.

Randomized Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility of Renal Allograft Monitoring by Urine CXCL10 Chemokine

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical utility of a noninvasive monitoring biomarker in renal transplantation. Although urine CXCL10 monitoring could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on 1-year outcomes, the study is a rich source for future design of trials aiming to explore the clinical utility of noninvasive biomarkers. In addition, the study supports the use of urine CXCL10 to assess the inflammatory status of the renal allograft.

BACKGROUND

Urine CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detection of renal allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of renal allograft monitoring by urine CXCL10 in a randomized trial.

METHODS

We stratified 241 patients, 120 into an intervention and 121 into a control arm. In both arms, urine CXCL10 levels were monitored at three specific time points (1, 3, and 6 months post-transplant). In the intervention arm, elevated values triggered performance of an allograft biopsy with therapeutic adaptations according to the result. In the control arm, urine CXCL10 was measured, but the results concealed. The primary outcome was a combined end point at 1-year post-transplant (death-censored graft loss, clinical rejection between month 1 and 1-year, acute rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, chronic active T-cell-mediated rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies, or eGFR <25 ml/min).

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the intervention and the control arm (51% versus 49%; relative risk (RR), 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.34]; P = 0.80). When including 175 of 241 (73%) patients in a per-protocol analysis, the incidence of the primary outcome was also not different (55% versus 49%; RR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.47]; P = 0.54). The incidence of the individual end points was not different as well.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of urine CXCL10 monitoring on 1-year outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov_ NCT03140514 ).

Identification and validation of urinary CXCL9 as a biomarker for diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis

BackgroundAcute tubulointerstitial nephritis (AIN) is one of the few causes of acute kidney injury with diagnosis-specific treatment options. However, due to the need to obtain a kidney biopsy for histological confirmation, AIN diagnosis can be delayed, missed, or incorrectly assumed. Here, we identify and validate urinary CXCL9, an IFN-γ-induced chemokine involved in lymphocyte chemotaxis, as a diagnostic biomarker for AIN.MethodsIn a prospectively enrolled cohort with pathologist-adjudicated histological diagnoses, termed the discovery cohort, we tested the association of 180 immune proteins measured by an aptamer-based assay with AIN and validated the top protein, CXCL9, using sandwich immunoassay. We externally validated these findings in 2 cohorts with biopsy-confirmed diagnoses, termed the validation cohorts, and examined mRNA expression differences in kidney tissue from patients with AIN and individuals in the control group.ResultsIn aptamer-based assay, urinary CXCL9 was 7.6-fold higher in patients with AIN than in individuals in the control group (P = 1.23 × 10-5). Urinary CXCL9 measured by sandwich immunoassay was associated with AIN in the discovery cohort (n = 204; 15% AIN) independently of currently available clinical tests for AIN (adjusted odds ratio for highest versus lowest quartile: 6.0 [1.8-20]). Similar findings were noted in external validation cohorts, where CXCL9 had an AUC of 0.94 (0.86-1.00) for AIN diagnosis. CXCL9 mRNA expression was 3.9-fold higher in kidney tissue from patients with AIN (n = 19) compared with individuals in the control group (n = 52; P = 5.8 × 10-6).ConclusionWe identified CXCL9 as a diagnostic biomarker for AIN using aptamer-based urine proteomics, confirmed this association using sandwich immunoassays in discovery and external validation cohorts, and observed higher expression of this protein in kidney biopsies from patients with AIN.FundingThis study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) awards K23DK117065 (DGM), K08DK113281 (KM), R01DK128087 (DGM), R01DK126815 (DGM and LGC), R01DK126477 (KNC), UH3DK114866 (CRP, DGM, and FPW), R01DK130839 (MES), and P30DK079310 (the Yale O'Brien Center). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

A plasmatic score using a miRNA signature and CXCL-10 for accurate prediction and diagnosis of liver allograft rejection

Introduction

The use of noninvasive biomarkers may avoid the need for liver biopsy (LB) and could guide immunosuppression adjustment in liver transplantation (LT). The aims of this study were: to confirm the predictive and diagnostic capacity of plasmatic expression of miR-155-5p, miR-181a-5p, miR-122-5p and CXCL-10 for assessing T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) risk; to develop a score based on a panel of noninvasive biomarkers to predict graft rejection risk and to validate this score in a separate cohort.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was conducted with a cohort of 79 patients followed during the first year after LT. Plasma samples were collected at predetermined time points for the analysis of miRNAs and the CXCL-10. Patients with LFTs abnormalities were submitted to a LB to rule out rejection, assessing previous and concurrent expression of the biomarkers to evaluate their predictive and diagnostic ability. Information from 86 patients included in a previous study was collected and used as a validation cohort.

Results

Twenty-four rejection episodes were diagnosed in 22 patients. Plasmatic CXCL-10 concentration and the expression of the three miRNAs were significantly elevated prior to and at the moment of the diagnosis of rejection. We developed a logistic model for rejection prediction and diagnosis, which included CXCL-10, miR-155-5p and miR-181a-5p. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for rejection prediction was 0.975 (79.6% sensitivity, 99.1% specificity, 90,7% PPV; 97.7% NPV; 97.1% correctly classified) and 0.99 for diagnosis (87.5% sensitivity, 99.5% specificity, 91.3% PPV; 99.3% NPV; 98.9% correctly classified). In the validation cohort (n=86; 14 rejections), the same cut-off points were used obtaining AUROCs for rejection prediction and diagnosis of 0.89 and 0.92 respectively. In patients with graft dysfunction in both cohorts the score could discriminate those with rejection regarding other causes with an AUROC of 0.98 (97.3% sensitivity, 94.1%specificity).

Conclusion

These results suggest that the clinical implementation of the monitoring of this noninvasive plasmatic score may allow the prediction and diagnosis of rejection and identify patients with graft dysfunction due to rejection, helping with a more efficient guide for immunosuppressive therapy adjustment. This finding warrants the development of prospective biomarker-guided clinical trials.

Diagnostic Potential of Minimally Invasive Biomarkers: A Biopsy-centered Viewpoint From the Banff Minimally Invasive Diagnostics Working Group

With recent advances and commercial implementation of minimally invasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation, new strategies for the surveillance of allograft health are emerging. Blood and urine-based biomarkers can be used to detect the presence of rejection, but their applicability as diagnostic tests has not been studied. A Banff working group was recently formed to consider the potential of minimally invasive biomarkers for integration into the Banff classification for kidney allograft pathology. We review the existing data on donor-derived cell-free DNA, blood and urine transcriptomics, urinary protein chemokines, and next-generation diagnostics and conclude that the available data do not support their use as stand-alone diagnostic tests at this point. Future studies assessing their ability to distinguish complex phenotypes, differentiate T cell-mediated rejection from antibody-mediated rejection, and function as an adjunct to histology are needed to elevate these minimally invasive biomarkers from surveillance tests to diagnostic tests.

STXBP3 and GOT2 predict immunological activity in acute allograft rejection

Background

Acute allograft rejection (AR) following renal transplantation contributes to chronic rejection and allograft dysfunction. The current diagnosis of AR remains dependent on renal allograft biopsy which cannot immediately detect renal allograft injury in the presence of AR. In this study, sensitive biomarkers for AR diagnosis were investigated and developed to protect renal function.

Methods

We analyzed pre- and postoperative data from five databases combined with our own data to identify the key differently expressed genes (DEGs). Furthermore, we performed a bioinformatics analysis to determine the immune characteristics of DEGs. The expression of key DEGs was further confirmed using the real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in patients with AR. ROC curves analysis was used to estimate the performance of key DEGs in the early diagnosis of AR.

Results

We identified glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 2 (GOT2) and syntaxin binding protein 3 (STXBP3) as key DEGs. The higher expression of STXBP3 and GOT2 in patients with AR was confirmed using RT-qPCR, ELISA, and IHC staining. ROC curve analysis also showed favorable values of STXBP3 and GOT2 for the diagnosis of early stage AR.

Conclusions

STXBP3 and GOT2 could reflect the immunological status of patients with AR and have strong potential for the diagnosis of early-stage AR.

An Antibody-Aptamer-Hybrid Lateral Flow Assay for Detection of CXCL9 in Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a key limiting factor for the clinical outcome of a kidney transplantation (Ktx), where early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention is needed. This study describes the identification of the biomarker CXC-motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9 as an indicator for AMR and presents a new aptamer-antibody-hybrid lateral flow assay (hybrid-LFA) for detection in urine. Biomarker evaluation included two independent cohorts of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from a protocol biopsy program and used subgroup comparisons according to BANFF-classifications. Plasma, urine and biopsy lysate samples were analyzed with a Luminex-based multiplex assay. The CXCL9-specific hybrid-LFA was developed based upon a specific rat antibody immobilized on a nitrocellulose-membrane and the coupling of a CXCL9-binding aptamer to gold nanoparticles. LFA performance was assessed according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Among 15 high-scored biomarkers according to a neural network analysis, significantly higher levels of CXCL9 were found in plasma and urine and biopsy lysates of KTRs with biopsy-proven AMR. The newly developed hybrid-LFA reached a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and an AUC of 0.79 for CXCL9. This point-of-care-test (POCT) improves early diagnosis-making in AMR after Ktx, especially in KTRs with undetermined status of donor-specific HLA-antibodies.

Biomarkers of alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation

Alloimmune events such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are the primary contributors to kidney transplant failure in children. For decades, a creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has been the non-invasive gold standard biomarker for detecting clinically significant alloimmune events, but it suffers from low sensitivity and specificity, especially in smaller children and older allografts. Many clinically "stable" children (based on creatinine) will have alloimmune events known as "subclinical acute rejection" (based on biopsy) that merely reflect the inadequacy of creatinine-based estimates for alloimmune injury rather than a distinct phenotype from clinical rejection with allograft dysfunction. The poor biomarker performance of creatinine leads to many unnecessary surveillance and for-cause biopsies that could be avoided by integrating non-invasive biomarkers with superior sensitivity and specificity into current clinical paradigms. In this review article, we will present and appraise the current state-of-the-art in monitoring for alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplantation. We will first discuss the current clinical standards for assessing the presence of alloimmune injury and predicting long-term outcomes. We will review principles of biomarker medicine and the application of comprehensive metrics to assess the performance of a given biomarker against the current gold standard. We will then highlight novel blood- and urine-based biomarkers (with special emphasis on pediatric biomarker studies) that have shown superior diagnostic and prognostic performance to the current clinical standards including creatinine-based eGFR. Finally, we will review some of the barriers to translating this research and implementing emerging biomarkers into common clinical practice, and present a transformative approach to using multiple biomarker platforms at different times to optimize the detection and management of critical alloimmune events in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Urinary CXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Urinary CXCL10 (uCXCL10) is associated with graft inflammation and graft survival, but the factors related to its excretion are not well known. HLA molecular matching at epitope level allow estimating the "dissimilarity" between donor and recipient HLA more precisely, being better related to further transplant outcomes. The relationship between uCXCL10 and HLA molecular mismatch has not been previously explored.

METHODS

HLA class I and class II typing of some 65 recipients and their donors was retrospectively performed by high resolution sequence-specific-primer (Life Technologies, Brown Deer, WI). The HLA-Matchmaker 3.1 software was used to assess eplet matching. Urine samples collected on the day of the 1-year surveillance biopsy were available of these 65 patients. uCXCL10 was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunoassay kit.

RESULTS

1-year uCXCL10 was independently associated with HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load (β 0.300, 95%CI 0.010-0.058, p = 0.006). Kidney transplant recipients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 showed higher values of uCXCL10 at 1-year (p = 0.018) than those with ≤3. Patients with a HLA-DQB1 eplet mismatch load >3 with subclinical AbMR had significantly higher levels of the logarithm of 1-year uCXCL10 (No AbMR 0.88, IQR 0.37; AbMR 1.38, IQR 0.34, p = 0.002) than those without AbMR.

CONCLUSIONS

uCXCL10 specifically relates to HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load. This relationship can partly explain the previously reported association between uCXCL10 excretion and graft inflammation. An adequate evaluation of any potential non-invasive biomarker, such as uCXCL10, must take into account the HLA molecular mismatch.

Urinary Cell mRNA Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status

Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney biopsy procedure, the diagnostic tool of choice, has become safer and the biopsy classification more refined. Nevertheless, biopsy-associated complications, interobserver variability in biopsy specimen scoring, and costs continue to be significant concerns. The dynamics of the immune repertoire make frequent assessments of allograft status necessary, but repeat biopsies of the kidney are neither practical nor safe. To address the existing challenges, we developed urinary cell mRNA profiling and investigated the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy of absolute levels of a hypothesis-based panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins. Enabled by our refinements of the PCR assay and by investigating mechanistic hypotheses, our single-center studies identified urinary cell mRNAs associated with T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and BK virus nephropathy. In the multicenter National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04, we discovered and validated a urinary cell three-gene signature of T-cell CD3 ε chain mRNA, interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18s ribosomal RNA that is diagnostic of subclinical acute cellular rejection and acute cellular rejection and prognostic of acute cellular rejection and graft function. The trajectory of the signature score remained flat and below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the patients with no rejection biopsy specimens, whereas a sharp rise was observed during the weeks before the biopsy specimen that showed acute cellular rejection. Our RNA sequencing and bioinformatics identified kidney allograft biopsy specimen gene signatures of acute rejection to be enriched in urinary cells matched to acute rejection biopsy specimens. The urinary cellular landscape was more diverse and more enriched for immune cell types compared with kidney allograft biopsy specimens. Urinary cell mRNA profile-guided clinical trials are needed to evaluate their value compared with current standard of care.

Urinary CXCL10 Measurement in Late Renal Allograft Biopsies Predicts Outcome Even in Histologically Quiescent Patients

BACKGROUND

CXCL10 is a promising early noninvasive diagnostic marker for allograft rejection and predictive for long-term outcomes. However, its value when measured later in the posttransplant course has not yet been accurately analyzed.

METHODS

We investigated urinary CXCL10 in 141 patients from a prospective, observational renal transplant cohort with 182 clinically indicated allograft biopsies performed >12 months posttransplant and corresponding urines. Urinary CXCL10 was retrospectively quantified on stored urines using the MSD V-Plex Chemokine Panel 1 sandwich immunoassay (Meso Scale Discovery). The primary outcome was a composite of allograft loss/renal function decline (>30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]-decrease between index biopsy and last follow-up).

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (51%) reached the primary outcome, and their urinary CXCL10 levels were significantly higher at the time of their biopsy compared with patients with stable allograft function (median 9.3 ng/mmol vs 3.3 ng/mmol, P < .0001). Time-to-endpoint analyses according to high/low urinary CXCL10 demonstrated that low urinary CXCL10 (≤7.0 ng/mmol) was associated with 73% 5-year event-free graft survival compared with 48% with high urinary CXCL10 (>7.0 ng/mmol; P = .0001). Even in histologically quiescent patients, high urinary CXCL10 was associated with inferior endpoint-free graft survival (P = .003), and it was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that urinary CXCL10 has a promising diagnostic performance for detection of late allograft rejection and is an independent predictor of long-term renal allograft outcomes, even in histologically quiescent patients.

Advantages of plasmatic CXCL-10 as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for the risk of rejection and subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation

This study evaluate the potential of plasmatic CXCL-10 (pCXCL-10) as a pre&post transplantation prognostic and diagnostic biomarker of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and subclinical rejection (SCR) risk in adult kidney recipients considering BKV and CMV infections as possible clinical confounder factors. Twenty-eight of 100 patients included experienced rejection (TCMR:14; ABMR:14); 8 SCR; 13 and 16 were diagnosed with BKV and CMV infection, respectively. Pre-transplantation pCXCL-10 was significantly increased in TCMR and ABMR and post-transplantation in TCMR, ABMR and SCR compared with nonrejectors. All CMV⁺ patients showed pCXCL-10 levels above the cutoff values established for rejection whereas the 80% of BKV⁺ patients showed pCXCL-10 concentration < 100 pg/mL. pCXCL-10 could improve pre-transplantation patient stratification and immunosuppressive treatment selection according to rejection risk; and after kidney transplantation could be a potential early prognostic biomarker for rejection. Clinical confounding factor in BKV⁺ and particularly in CMV⁺ patients must be discarded.

Non-Invasive Diagnosis for Acute Rejection Using Urinary mRNA Signature Reflecting Allograft Status in Kidney Transplantation

Urine has been regarded as a good resource based on the assumption that urine can directly reflect the state of the allograft or ongoing injury in kidney transplantation. Previous studies, suggesting the usefulness of urinary mRNA as a biomarker of acute rejection, imply that urinary mRNA mirrors the transcriptional activity of the kidneys. We selected 14 data-driven candidate genes through a meta-analysis and measured the candidate genes using quantitative PCR without pre-amplification in the cross-sectional specimens from Korean kidney transplant patients. Expression of 9/14 genes (CXCL9, CD3ϵ, IP-10, LCK, C1QB, PSMB9, Tim-3, Foxp3, and FAM26F) was significantly different between acute rejection and stable graft function with normal pathology and long-term graft survival in 103 training samples. CXCL9 was also distinctly expressed in allografts with acute rejection in in situ hybridization analysis. This result, consistent with the qPCR result, implies that urinary mRNA could reflect the magnitude of allograft injury. We developed an AR prediction model with the urinary mRNAs by a binary logistic regression and the AUC of the model was 0.89 in the training set. The model was validated in 391 independent samples, and the AUC value yielded 0.84 with a fixed manner. In addition, the decision curve analysis indicated a range of reasonable threshold probabilities for biopsy. Therefore, we suggest the urine mRNA signature could be used as a non-invasive monitoring tool of acute rejection for clinical application and could help determine whether to perform a biopsy in a recipient with increased creatinine.

A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

There is an unmet need for noninvasive tools for diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminative value of a combined cellular and molecular biomarker platform in urine for the detection of rejection.

Challenges of Diagnosing Antibody-Mediated Rejection: The Role of Invasive and Non-Invasive Biomarkers

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment modality for end-stage kidney disease, leading to improvement in a patient’s quality and quantity of life. With significant improvements in short-term outcomes, prolonging long-term allograft and patient survival remain ongoing challenges. The ability to monitor allograft function, immune tolerance and predict rejection accurately would enable personalization and better prognostication during post-transplant care. Though kidney biopsy remains the backbone of transplant diagnostics, emerging biomarkers can help detecting kidney allograft injury early enough to prevent permanent damage and detect injury before it is clinically apparent. In this review, we summarize the recent biomarkers that have shown promise in the prediction of acute rejection with a focus on antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation.

[Urinary biomarkers in kidney transplant recipients: From technological innovations to clinical development]

In kidney transplantation, the assessment of individual risks remains highly imperfect and highlights the need for robust noninvasive biomarkers with the overall goal to improve patient and graft outcomes. In the field of noninvasive biomarkers discovery, urinary biomarkers are promising tools which use easily accessible biological fluid. During the past decades, the technical revolution in the fields of genetics and molecular biology, and advances in chemistry and data analysis have led to a wealth of studies using urinary cell pellets or supernatants from kidney transplant recipients. Transcriptomic, proteomic and metabonomic analyses have suggested numerous signatures for the diagnoses of acute rejection, delayed-graft function or interstitial fibrosis. Nevertheless, the translation and validation of exploratory findings and their implementation into standard clinical practice remain challenging. This requires dedicated prospective interventional trials demonstrating that the use of these biomarkers avoids invasive procedures and improves patient or transplant outcomes.

Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Is Related to Acute Graft Lesions Secondary to T Cell- and Antibody-Mediated Damage

Background

Non-invasive biomarkers of graft rejection are needed to optimize the management and outcomes of kidney transplant recipients. Urinary excretion of IFN-γ-related chemokine CXCL10 is clearly associated with clinical and subclinical T cell-mediated graft inflammation, but its relationship with antibody-mediated damage has not been fully addressed. Further, the variables influencing levels of urinary CXCL10 excretion are unknown.

Material/Methods

A total of 151 kidney graft biopsies (92 surveillance and 59 indication biopsies) and 151 matched urine samples obtained before biopsy were prospectively analyzed. T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) were defined according to the 2017 Banff classification criteria. Urinary CXCL10 levels were measured by ELISA and corrected by urinary creatinine.

Results

Banff scores ‘t’, ‘i’, ‘g’, and ‘ptc’ were significantly related to urinary CXCL10 levels. Multivariate analysis showed that ‘t’ (β=0.107, P=0.001) and ‘ptc’ (β=0.093, P=0.002) were significantly associated with urinary CXCL10. Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were related to the high excretion of urinary CXCL10 at 1 year after transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 17.817, P=0.003). Urinary CXCL10 showed good discrimination ability for AbMR (AUC-ROC 0.760, P=0.001). The third tertile of urinary CXCL10 remained significantly associated with AbMR (OR 4.577, 95% confidence interval 1.799–11.646, P=0.001) after multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusions

DSA was the only variable clearly related to high urinary CXCL10 levels. Urinary CXCL10 is a good non-invasive candidate biomarker of AbMR and TCMR, supplying information independent of renal function and other variables normally used to monitor kidney transplants.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Transplantation-A Case Series and Comprehensive Review of Current Knowledge

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and deaths in solid organ transplant recipients. In immunocompetent patients, cancer prognosis has been dramatically improved with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors, that increase antitumor immune responses. ICI has been developed outside of the scope of transplantation because of the theoretical risk of graft rejection, which has later been confirmed by the publication of several cases and small series. The use of ICI became unavoidable for treating advanced cancers including in organ transplant patients, but their management in this setting remains highly challenging, as to date no strategy to adapt the immunosuppression and to prevent graft rejection has been defined. In this article, we report a monocentric series of 5 solid organ transplant recipients treated with ICI and provide a comprehensive review of current knowledge of ICI management in the setting of solid organ transplantation. Strategies warranted to increase knowledge through collecting more exhaustive data are also discussed.

Prediction scores for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: nil satis nisi optimum

Long-term graft survival is the main concern of kidney transplantation. Some strategies have been tested to predict graft survival using estimated glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria at different time points, histologic assessment, non-invasive biomarkers or even machine-learning methods. However, the 'magical formulae' for allograft survival prediction does not exist yet.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Systematic Review

Noninvasive tools for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney allograft rejection have been extensively investigated in recent years. Biochemical and molecular analyses of blood and urine provide a liquid biopsy that could offer new possibilities for rejection prevention, monitoring, and therefore, treatment. Nevertheless, these tools are not yet available for routine use in clinical practice. In this systematic review, MEDLINE was searched for articles assessing urinary biomarkers for diagnosis or prediction of kidney allograft acute rejection published in the last five years (from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020). This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles providing targeted or unbiased urine sample analysis for the diagnosis or prediction of both acute cellular and antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection were included, analyzed, and graded for methodological quality with a particular focus on study design and diagnostic test accuracy measures. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligands were the most promising and frequently studied biomarkers. The combination of precise diagnostic reference in training sets with accurate validation in real-life cohorts provided the most relevant results and exciting groundwork for future studies.

Prognostic value of the donor-derived cell-free DNA assay in acute renal rejection therapy: A prospective cohort study

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for monitoring allograft status. However, whether dd-cfDNA can reflect real-time anti-rejection treatment effects remains unclear. We prospectively recruited 28 patients with acute renal rejection, including 5 with ABMR, 12 with type IA or type IB rejection, and 11 with type IIA or IIB rejection. dd-cfDNA levels in peripheral blood were measured using human single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) locus capture hybridization. The percentage of dd-cfDNA (dd-cfDNA%) declined significantly from 2.566 ± 0.549% to 0.773 ± 0.116% (P < .001) after anti-rejection therapy. The dd-cfDNA% decreased steadily over the course of 3 days with daily methylprednisolone injections, but no significant difference in the dd-cfDNA% was observed between the end of anti-rejection therapy and 2 weeks later. Changes in the dd-cfDNA% (∆dd-cfDNA%) demonstrated a positive correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rates at 1 month (ρ = 2.570, P = .022), 3 months (ρ = 3.210, P = .027), and 6 months (ρ = 2.860, P = .019) after therapy. Thus, the dd-cfDNA assay shows prognostic capabilities in therapy outcome and allograft recovery; however, its ability is inhibited by methylprednisolone regardless of the types of rejection. Additionally, a reassessment of frequency intervals for testing is required.

Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction

New biomarkers of early and late graft dysfunction are needed in renal transplant to improve management of complications and prolong graft survival. A wide range of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, measured in different biological fluids (serum, plasma, urine) and in renal tissues, have been proposed for post-transplant delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). This review investigates old and new potential biomarkers for each of these clinical domains, seeking to underline their limits and strengths. OMICs technology has allowed identifying many candidate biomarkers, providing diagnostic and prognostic information at very early stages of pathological processes, such as AR. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) are further promising tools. Although most of these biomarkers still need to be validated in multiple independent cohorts and standardized, they are paving the way for substantial advances, such as the possibility of accurately predicting risk of DGF before graft is implanted, of making a “molecular” diagnosis of subclinical rejection even before histological lesions develop, or of dissecting etiology of CAD. Identification of “immunoquiescent” or even tolerant patients to guide minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is another area of active research. The parallel progress in imaging techniques, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence (AI) is helping to fully exploit the wealth of information provided by biomarkers, leading to improved disease nosology of old entities such as transplant glomerulopathy. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether introduction of these new sets of biomarkers into clinical practice could actually reduce the need for renal biopsy, integrate traditional tools, and ultimately improve graft survival compared to current management.

Diagnostic yield of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging and urinary CXCL9/creatinine levels in kidney allograft subclinical rejection

Subclinical kidney allograft acute rejection (SCR) corresponds to "the unexpected histological evidence of acute rejection in a stable patient." SCR detection relies on surveillance biopsy. Noninvasive approaches may help avoid biopsy-associated complications. From November 2015 to January 2018, we prospectively performed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) after injection of F¹⁸ -fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸ F-FDG) in adult kidney transplant recipients with surveillance biopsy at ~3 months posttransplantation. The Banff-2017 classification was used. The ratio of the mean standard uptake value (mSUVR) between kidney cortex and psoas muscle was measured. Urinary levels of CXCL-9 were concomitantly quantified. Our 92-patient cohort was categorized upon histology: normal (n = 70), borderline (n = 16), and SCR (n = 6). No clinical or biological difference was observed between groups. The mSUVR reached 1.87 ± 0.55, 1.94 ± 0.35, and 2.41 ± 0.54 in normal, borderline, and SCR groups, respectively. A significant difference in mSUVR was found among groups. Furthermore, mSUVR was significantly higher in the SCR vs normal group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.79, with 83% sensitivity using an mSUVR threshold of 2.4. The AUC of urinary CXCL-9/creatinine ratios comparatively reached 0.79. The mSUVR positively correlated with ti and acute composite Banff scores. ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET/CT helps noninvasively exclude SCR, with a negative predictive value of 98%. External validations are required.

A CRISPR-based assay for the detection of opportunistic infections post-transplantation and for the monitoring of transplant rejection

In organ transplantation, infection and rejection are major causes of graft loss. They are linked by the net state of immunosuppression. To diagnose and treat these conditions earlier, and to improve long-term patient outcomes, refined strategies for the monitoring of patients after graft transplantation are needed. Here, we show that a fast and inexpensive assay based on CRISPR-Cas13 accurately detects BK polyomavirus DNA and cytomegalovirus DNA from patient-derived blood and urine samples, as well as CXCL9 messenger RNA (a marker of graft rejection) at elevated levels in urine samples from patients experiencing acute kidney transplant rejection. The assay, which we adapted for lateral-flow readout, enables-via simple visualization-the post-transplantation monitoring of common opportunistic viral infections and of graft rejection, and should facilitate point-of-care post-transplantation monitoring.

Longitudinal assessment of the CXCL10 blood and urine concentration in kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus replication-a retrospective study

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication may progress to polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN). In this retrospective study, we assessed the chemokine CXCL10 in urine and blood samples consecutively acquired from 85 KTRs who displayed different stages of BKPyV replication and eventually developed PVAN. In parallel to progression toward PVAN, CXCL10 gradually increased in blood and urine, from baseline (prior to virus replication) to BKPyV DNAuria (median increase in blood: 42.15 pg/ml, P = 0.0156), from mere DNAuria to low‐ and high‐level BKPyV DNAemia (median increase: 52.60 and 87.26 pg/ml, P = 0.0010 and P = 0.0002, respectively) and peaked with histologically confirmed PVAN (median increase: 145.00 pg/ml, P < 0.0001). CXCL10 blood and urine levels significantly differed among KTRs with respect to simultaneous presence of human cytomegalovirus (P < 0.001) as well as in relation to the clinical severity of respective BKPyV DNAemia episodes (P = 0.0195). CXCL‐10 concentrations were particularly lower in KTRs in whom BKPyV DNAemia remained without clinical evidence for PVAN, as compared to individuals who displayed high decoy cell levels, decreased renal function and/or biopsy‐proven PVAN (median blood concentration: 266.97 vs. 426.42 pg/ml, P = 0.0282). In conclusion, in KTRs CXCL10 rises in parallel to BKPyV replication and correlates with the gradual development of PVAN.

Technical Considerations and Confounders for Urine CXCL10 Chemokine Measurement

Background.

The urine C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) is a promising screening biomarker for renal allograft rejection. The aim of the study was to investigate important technical and biological aspects as well as potential confounders when measuring urine CXCL10.

Methods.

We analyzed 595 urine samples from 117 patients, who participated in a randomized controlled trial investigating the clinical utility of urine CXCL10 monitoring for posttransplant management. Urine CXCL10 was measured by an immunoassay using electrochemiluminescence.

Results.

Intraassay coefficient of variation was 2.5%, and interassay coefficient of variation was 10%. Urine CXCL10 remained stable (ie, <10% degradation) for 8 hours at 25°C or 37°C and for 3 days at 4°C. CXCL10 concentrations [pg/mL] strongly correlated with urine CXCL10/creatinine ratios [ng/mmol] (r² = 0.98; P < 0.0001). Leucocyturia and active BK-polyomavirus infection are associated with higher CXCL10 concentrations, while allograft function, serum CRP, patient age, proteinuria, urine pH, hematuria, squamous epithelia cell count, and bacteriuria did not correlate with urine CXCL10 concentrations. In 145 paired samples obtained within 1–2 weeks, 80% showed a CXCL10/creatinine ratio change of < ±2 ng/mmol or ±50%, respectively.

Conclusions.

Urine CXCL10 measurement on the used platform is accurate and robust. Leucocyturia and active BK-polyomavirus infection are major confounders, which can be easily detected but represent important diagnostic “blind spots” when using urine CXCL10 to screen for allograft rejection. The intraindividual biological variability of urine CXCL10 within 1–2 weeks is mostly below ±50%, which is still much higher than the technical variability due to sample handling/processing (<20%).

Transcription Factor and miRNA Interplays Can Manifest the Survival of ccRCC Patients

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) still remains a higher mortality rate in worldwide. Obtaining promising biomakers is very crucial for improving the diagnosis and prognosis of ccRCC patients. Herein, we firstly identified eight potentially prognostic miRNAs (hsa-miR-144-5p, hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-365b-3p, hsa-miR-3613-5p, hsa-miR-9-5p, hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-335-3p, hsa-miR-1269a). Secondly, we found that a signature containing these eight miRNAs showed obviously superior to a single miRNA in the prognostic effect and credibility for predicting the survival of ccRCC patients. Thirdly, we discovered that twenty-two transcription factors (TFs) interact with these eight miRNAs, and a signature combining nine TFs (TFAP2A, KLF5, IRF1, RUNX1, RARA, GATA3, IKZF1, POU2F2, and FOXM1) could promote the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Finally, we further identified eleven genes (hsa-miR-365b-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-1269a, hsa-miR-144-5p, hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-335-3p, TFAP2A, KLF5, IRF1, MYC, IKZF1) that could combine as a signature to improve the prognosis effect of ccRCC patients, which distinctly outperformed the eight-miRNA signature and the nine-TF signature. Overall, we identified several new prognosis factors for ccRCC, and revealed a potential mechanism that TFs and miRNAs interplay cooperatively or oppositely regulate a certain number of tumor suppressors, driver genes, and oncogenes to facilitate the survival of ccRCC patients.

Landscape of innate immune system transcriptome and acute T cell-mediated rejection of human kidney allografts

Acute rejection of human allografts has been viewed mostly through the lens of adaptive immunity, and the intragraft landscape of innate immunity genes has not been characterized in an unbiased fashion. We performed RNA sequencing of 34 kidney allograft biopsy specimens from 34 adult recipients; 16 were categorized as Banff acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 18 as normal. Computational analysis of intragraft mRNA transcriptome identified significantly higher abundance of mRNA for pattern recognition receptors in TCMR compared with normal biopsies, as well as increased expression of mRNAs for cytokines, chemokines, interferons, and caspases. Intragraft levels of calcineurin mRNA were higher in TCMR biopsies, suggesting underimmunosuppression compared with normal biopsies. Cell-type-enrichment analysis revealed higher abundance of dendritic cells and macrophages in TCMR biopsies. Damage-associated molecular patterns, the endogenous ligands for pattern recognition receptors, as well markers of DNA damage were higher in TCMR. mRNA expression patterns supported increased calcium flux and indices of endoplasmic, cellular oxidative, and mitochondrial stress were higher in TCMR. Expression of mRNAs in major metabolic pathways was decreased in TCMR. Our global and unbiased transcriptome profiling identified heightened expression of innate immune system genes during an episode of TCMR in human kidney allografts.

"Acute kidney dysfunction with no rejection" is associated with poor renal outcomes at 2 years post kidney transplantation

Background

“Acute kidney dysfunction with no rejection” (ADNR) corresponds to acute kidney injury without histological evidence of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The prognosis of ADNR is unknown.

Methods

From 2007 to 2015, we categorized KTR with for-cause kidney biopsy within the first 12 months post kidney transplantation (KTx) into ADNR (n = 93) and biopsy-proven AR (n = 22). Controls (C, n = 135) included KTR with no ADNR or AR within the first 24 months post-KTx. A piecewise linear regression with a single fixed-knot at 12 months served to establish intercepts and slopes of MDRD-eGFR variations from 12 to 24 months. The percentage of KTR with ≥30% reduction of eGFR from 12 to 24 months was calculated as a surrogate marker of future graft loss.

Results

The median time for for-cause biopsy was 22 [10–70] and 13 [7–43] days for ADNR and AR, respectively. At 12 months, eGFR was significantly higher in C (57.6 ± 14.9 mL/min/1.73m²) vs. ADNR (43.5 ± 15.4 mL/min/1.73m², p < 0.0001) and vs. AR (46.5 ± 15.2 mL/min/1.73m², p < 0.0065). The proportion of KTR with ≥30% reduction in eGFR from 12 to 24 months reached 16.3% in C vs. 29.9% in ADNR (p = 0.02) and vs. 15% in AR (not significant).

Conclusions

ADNR is associated with poor outcomes within 2 years post-KTx.

Guiding regulatory T cells to the allograft

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy in organ transplantation is actively being pursued using unmodified, typically polyclonal cells. As the results of these ongoing clinical trials emerge, it is time to plan the next wave of clinical trials of Tregs. Here we will review a key strategy to improve Treg effectiveness and reduce side effects, namely increasing Treg specificity - both in terms of antigen recognition and localization to the allograft.

RECENT FINDINGS

Study of chemokine signatures accompanying acute rejection has revealed several chemokines that could be targeted to increase Treg homing. For example, Tregs possessing a Th1-like phenotype and expressing CXCR3 are better able to migrate towards local inflammation. Allografts themselves can be modified to increase Treg-attracting chemokines and Tregs themselves can produce chemokines, facilitating local proximity to their targets of suppression. Finally, tailoring Treg antigen specificity by T-cell or chimeric antigen receptor engineering is another approach to increase the specificity of suppression and optimize localization.

SUMMARY

Treg localization to the graft is important, but the important role of lymph node and germinal center homing cannot be overlooked. There is an opportunity to learn from advances made in cancer immunotherapy to optimize Treg therapy for transplantation.

Non-invasive Biomarkers of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: Novel Targets and Strategies

Kidney transplantation is considered the favored treatment for patients suffering from end-stage renal disease, since successful transplantation is associated with longer survival and improved quality of life compared to dialysis. Alloreactive immune responses against the donor kidney may lead to acute rejection of the transplant. The current diagnosis of renal allograft rejection mainly relies on clinical monitoring, including serum creatinine, proteinuria, and confirmation by histopathologic assessment in the kidney transplant biopsy. These parameters have their limitations. Identification and validation of biomarkers, which correlate with or predict the presence of acute rejection, and which could improve therapeutic decision making, are priorities for the transplantation community. There is a need for alternative, less invasive but sensitive markers to diagnose acute graft rejection. Here, we provide an overview of the current status on research of biomarkers of acute kidney transplant rejection in blood and urine. We specifically discuss relatively novel research strategies in biomarker research, including transcriptomics and proteomics, and elaborate on donor-derived cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker.

Analysis of Biomarkers Within the Initial 2 Years Posttransplant and 5-Year Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Results From Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-17

BACKGROUND

An early posttransplant biomarker/surrogate marker for kidney allograft loss has the potential to guide targeted interventions. Previously published findings, including results from the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (CTOT)-01 study, showed that elevated urinary chemokine CXCL9 levels and elevated frequencies of donor-reactive interferon gamma (IFNγ)-producing T cells by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay associated with acute cellular rejection within the first year and with lower 1-year posttransplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). How well these biomarkers correlate with late outcomes, including graft loss, is unclear.

METHODS

In CTOT-17, we obtained 5-year outcomes in the CTOT-01 cohort and correlated them with (a) biomarker results and (b) changes in eGFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula) over the initial 2 years posttransplant using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Graft loss occurred in 14 (7.6%) of 184 subjects 2 to 5 years posttransplant. Neither IFNγ ELISPOTs nor urinary CXCL9 were informative. In contrast, a 40% or greater decline in eGFR from 6 months to 2 years posttransplant independently correlated with 13-fold odds of 5-year graft loss (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-56.6), a result that was validated in the independent Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection cohort (n = 165; adjusted odds ratio, 11.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that although pretransplant and early posttransplant ELISPOT and chemokine measurements associate with outcomes within 2 years posttransplant, changes in eGFR between 3 or 6 months and 24 months are better surrogates for 5-year outcomes, including graft loss.

Evolution of renal function and urinary biomarker indicators of inflammation on serial kidney biopsies in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with and without rejection

Urinary CXCL10 and metabolites are biomarkers independently associated with TCMR. We sought to test whether these biomarkers fluctuate in association with histological severity of TCMR over short time frames. Forty-nine pairs of renal biopsies obtained 1-3 months apart from 40 pediatric renal transplant recipients were each scored for TCMR acuity score (i + t; Banff criteria). Urinary CXCL10:Cr and TCMR MDS were obtained at each biopsy and were tested for association with changes between biopsies in acuity, estimated GFR (ΔeGFR), and 12-month ΔeGFR. Sequential biopsies were obtained 1.8 ± 0.8 months apart. Biopsy 1 was usually obtained under protocol (75%), and 62% percent had evidence of TCMR. Using each biopsy pair for comparison, ΔeGFR did not predict change in acuity. By contrast, change in acuity was significantly correlated with change in urinary CXCL10:Cr (ρ 0.45, P = .003) and MDS (ρ 0.29, P = .04) between biopsies. The 12-month ΔeGFR was not predicted by TCMR acuity or CXCL10:Cr at Biopsy 2; however, an inverse correlation was seen with urinary MDS (ρ -0.35; P = .02). Changes in eGFR correlate poorly with evolving TCMR acuity on histology. Urinary biomarkers may be superior for non-invasive monitoring of rejection, including histological response to therapy, and may be prognostic for medium-term function.

Urinary miR-155-5p and CXCL10 as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of rejection, graft outcome and treatment response in kidney transplantation

AIMS

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) may be useful biomarkers of rejection and allograft outcome in kidney transplantation. Elevated urinary CXCL10 levels have been associated with acute rejection (AR) and may predict allograft failure. We examined the correlation of miRNA, CXCL10 levels and immunosuppressive drug exposure with AR and graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Eighty de novo kidney transplant recipients were recruited from four European centres. All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. Urinary pellet expression of miR-142-3p, miR-210-3p and miR-155-5p was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and urinary CXCL10 levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the 1^st week and the 1^st , 2^nd , 3^rd and 6^th months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Eight patients experienced AR. Before and during AR, patients showed a significant increase of urinary miR-142-3p, miR-155-5p and CXCL10 levels and a decrease of miR-210-3p levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that miR-155-5p (area under the curve = 0.875; P = 0.046) and CXCL10 (area under the curve = 0.865; P = 0.029) had excellent capacity to discriminate between rejectors and nonrejectors. The optimal cut-off values for the prognosis of AR were 0.51, with 85% sensitivity and 86% specificity for miR-155-5p and 84.73 pg ml^-1 , with 84% sensitivity and 80% specificity for CXCL10. miR-155-5p and CXCL10 levels correlated with glomerular filtration rate. Levels of both biomarkers normalized after recovery of graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

The regular early post-transplantation monitoring of urinary miR-155-5p and CXCL10 can help in the prognosis of AR and graft dysfunction. Large prospective randomized multicentre trials are warranted to refine our cut-off values and validate the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers.

A Comparative Study of the Predictive Values of Urinary Acute Kidney Injury Markers Angiogenin and Kidney Injury Molecule 1 for the Outcomes of Kidney Allografts

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Whether injury-related molecules in urines of individuals with ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) are independent predictors of graft outcomes and provide additional information compared with usual risk factors remains to be established.

Methods

We explored a cohort of 244 kidney transplant recipients who systematically had a urine collection 10 days after transplantation. The injury-related markers kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and angiogenin (ANG) levels in urines were measured. We determined the prognostic values of these markers on graft outcomes.

Results

Urinary KIM-1 and ANG concentrations were strongly correlated to each other and were significantly and independently associated with cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, and plasma creatinine 10 days after transplantation, indicating that these markers reflect the severity of IRI. However, urinary ANG and KIM-1 were not predictive of histological changes on protocol biopsies performed 3 and 12 months after transplantation. Finally, urinary ANG and urinary KIM-1 were not associated with graft survival.

Conclusions

Together, our results indicate that, in a cohort of 244 kidney transplant recipients, urinary ANG and KIM-1 levels in a single measurement 10 days after transplantation reflect the severity of IRI after kidney transplantation, but are neither independent predictors of renal function, histological changes and graft survival.

Immune monitoring in renal transplantation: The search for biomarkers

It is now widely accepted that in order to improve long-term graft function and survival, a more personalized immunosuppressive treatment of transplant patients according to the individual anti-donor immune response status is needed. This applies to the identification of potentially "high-risk" patients likely to develop acute rejection episodes or display an accelerated decline of graft function, patients who might need immunosuppression intensification, and operationally tolerant patients suitable for immunosuppression minimization or weaning off. Such a patient stratification would benefit from biomarkers, which enable categorization into low and high risk or, ideally, identification of operational tolerant patients. Here, we report on recent developments regarding identification and performance analysis of noninvasive biomarkers such as mRNA and miRNA expression profiles, chemokines, or changes in immune cell subsets in either blood or urine of renal transplant patients. We will also discuss which future steps are needed to accelerate their clinical implementation.

Urine biomarkers in renal allograft

There is a high risk for the survival of patients with an end-stage renal disease for kidney transplantation. To avoid rejection by strict medication adherence is of utmost importance to avoid the failure of a kidney transplant. It is imperative to develop non-invasive biomarkers to assess immunity risk, and to ultimately provide guidance for therapeutic decision-making following kidney transplantation. Urine biomarkers may represent the promising non-invasive tools that will help in predicting risk or success rates of kidney transplantations. Furthermore, composite urinary biomarkers or urinary biomarker panel array might be critical in improving the sensitivity and specificity in reflecting various risks of kidney failure during transplantation. This review primarily focuses on the role of such biomarkers in predicting chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in renal allograft.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

Urinary Angiogenin Reflects the Magnitude of Kidney Injury at the Infrahistologic Level

The ribonuclease angiogenin is a component of the mammalian stress response that is secreted by renal epithelial cells on activation of the inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α)-active spliced X-box binding protein 1 (sXBP1) axis and instrumental to the adaptation to AKI associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress. To determine whether the amount of angiogenin in urine of individuals with a kidney injury reflects the magnitude of the lesions and provides information on the risk of organ failure, we examined individuals referred for a kidney injury and determined the biochemical characteristics of urinary angiogenin and its diagnostic and prognostic values. Urinary angiogenin did not correlate with the urinary concentrations of high molecular weight proteins and correlated only weakly with low molecular weight proteins, suggestive of tubular production. In a cohort of 242 kidney transplant recipients with acute allograft dysfunction, higher urinary angiogenin concentrations at the time of the biopsy associated with worse renal function and higher proteinuria but did not correlate with histologic lesions as defined in the Banff classification. Kidney transplant recipients with urinary angiogenin amounts in the highest 50% had a risk of graft failure 3.59 times as high (95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 15.94) as that of patients with amounts in the lowest 50%. Finally, the amount of urinary angiogenin reflected the activity of the IRE1α-XBP1 axis in allografts. Our approach identified urinary angiogenin as a noninvasive indicator of the extent of tissue damage, independent of the histologic lesions, and a risk predictor of kidney allograft failure.