Outpatient Management of Delayed Graft Function Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay Without an Increase in Adverse Events

Delayed graft function has comparable associations with early outcomes in primary and repeat transplant among deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication and is associated with worse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). There are various risk factors for DGF including previous transplant. We hypothesized that DGF among KTRs undergoing repeat transplant has a greater impact on outcomes compared to primary KTRs.

METHODS

All deceased-donor KTRs between 01/2000 and 12/2020 at our center were included. Recipients were categorized as primary KTR or repeat KTR (any number of previous kidney transplants). Outcomes of interest included acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality within 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

A total of 3137 deceased-donor KTRs were included; 2498(80%) were primary KTRs and 639(20%) were repeat KTRs. The rates of DGF were similar between the groups at 29% and 28%, respectively. Compared to KTRs without DGF, DGF was associated with a greater incidence of death and graft failure in both primary and repeat transplants; however, the risk of rejection was not significantly higher in repeat KTRs (p = 0.72). Comparing primary and repeat KTRs, there were no significant differences in either acute rejection (p-interaction = 0.11), death-censored graft failure (p-interaction = 0.38), or death (p-interaction = 0.37). In subgroup analysis among repeat KTRs with DGF, a repeat transplant with no prior DGF was associated with increased risk for death-censored graft failure and death but not for acute rejection. DGF in the prior transplant was protective against death-censored graft failure (HR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.005-0.98, p = 0.05) (p-interaction = 0.04), but this was not significantly associated with acute rejection or death.

CONCLUSION

DGF is associated with similar detrimental outcomes among primary and repeat KTRs.

Readmission Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With and Without Delayed Graft Function

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-transplant event associated with increased resource utilization. As a center with experience in DGF, we aimed to assess differences in readmissions and post-transplant outcomes between patients with and without DGF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2015 and 2020. Recipients with at least one early readmission following kidney transplantation were included in the study. Two groups were identified: (1) recipients with DGF who required early readmission and (2) recipients without DGF who required early readmission.

RESULTS

Among recipients with DGF, 43.9% (n = 405) required early readmission compared to 29.1% (n = 179) without DGF (P < .0001). There were no differences in the initial hospital length of stay (P = .08), and most recipients in both groups only required a single readmission (61.7% vs 72.1%, P = .02). Recipients with DGF were more likely to have ≥2 readmissions (P = .02) and a higher total readmission rate (P = .006). Recipients with DGF who required readmission also required more outpatient clinic visits (P = .003). When comparing recipients with and without DGF who required readmission, there were no differences in patient (P = .22) or death-censored (P = .72) graft survival. When comparing patients with and without DGF requiring one versus ≥2 readmissions, there were no differences in patient survival (P = .15), however patients with DGF and ≥2 readmissions had lower death-censored graft survival (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients with DGF are at increased risk of readmission. Transplant center-level changes to reduce readmissions and infections could have an important impact on DGF outcomes.

Serum β2-Microglobulin Predicts Time to Recovery of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with adverse patients and allograft outcomes. A longer duration of DGF is predictive of worse graft outcomes compared to a shorter duration. Posttransplant serum β2-microglobulin (B2M) is associated with long-term graft outcomes, but its relationship with DGF recovery is unknown.

METHODS

We included all kidney-only transplant recipients with DGF enrolled in the E-DGF trial. Duration of DGF was defined as the interval between the transplant and the last dialysis session. We analyzed the association of standardized serum creatinine (Scr) and B2M on postoperative Days (POD) 1-7 during the subsequent days of DGF with the recovery of DGF.

RESULTS

A total of 97 recipients with DGF were included. The mean duration of DGF was 11.0 ± 11.2 days. Higher Scr was not associated with the duration of DGF in unadjusted or adjusted models. Higher standardized B2M, in contrast, was associated with a prolonged duration of DGF. This association remained in models adjusting for baseline characteristics from POD 2 (3.19 days longer, 95% CI: 0.46-5.93; p = 0.02) through Day 6 of DGF (4.97 days longer, 95% CI: 0.75-9.20; p = 0.02). There was minimal change in mean Scr (0.01 ± 0. 10 mg/dL per day; p = 0.32), while B2M significantly decreased as the time to recovery approached (-0.14 ± 0.05 mg/L per day; p = 0.006), among recipients with DGF.

CONCLUSION

B2M is more strongly associated with DGF recovery than Scr. Posttransplant B2M may be an important biomarker to monitor during DGF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03864926.

Twelve Thousand Kidney Transplants Over More Than 55 Y: A Single-center Experience

Background

Kidney transplant outcomes have dramatically improved since the first successful transplant in 1954. In its early years, kidney transplantation was viewed more skeptically. Today it is considered the treatment of choice among patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Methods

Our program performed its first kidney transplant in 1966 and recently performed our 12 000th kidney transplant. Here, we review and describe our experience with these 12 000 transplants. Transplant recipients were analyzed by decade of date of transplant: 1966-1975, 1976-1985, 1986-1995, 1996-2005, 2006-2015, and 2016-2022. Death-censored graft failure and mortality were outcomes of interest.

Results

Of 12 000 kidneys, 247 were transplanted from 1966 to 1975, 1147 from 1976 to 1985, 2194 from 1986 to 1995, 3147 from 1996 to 2005, 3046 from 2006 to 2015, and 2219 from 2016 to 2022 compared with 1966-1975, there were statistically significant and progressively lower risks of death-censored graft failure at 1 y, 5 y, and at last follow-up in all subsequent eras. Although mortality at 1 y was lower in all subsequent eras after 1986-1995, there was no difference in mortality at 5 y or the last follow-up between eras.

Conclusions

In this large cohort of 12 000 kidneys from a single center, we observed significant improvement in outcomes over time. Kidney transplantation remains a robust and ever-growing and improving field.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Envarsus Versus Immediate Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function

BACKGROUND

The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in the United States continues to increase. The effect of immediate-release tacrolimus (tacrolimus) compared with extended-release tacrolimus (Envarsus) among recipients with DGF is unknown.

METHODS

This was a single-center open-label randomized control trial among KTRs with DGF (ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT03864926). KTRs were randomized either to continue on tacrolimus or switch to Envarsus at a 1:1 ratio. Duration of DGF (study period), number of dialysis treatments, and need for adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) doses during the study period were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 100 KTRs were enrolled, 50 in the Envarsus arm and 50 in the tacrolimus arm; of those, 49 in the Envarsus arm and 48 in the tacrolimus arm were included for analysis. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics, all P > .5, except donors in the Envarsus arm had higher body mass index (mean body mass index 32.9 ± 11.3 vs 29.4 ± 7.6 kg/m2 [P = .007]) compared with the tacrolimus arm. The median duration of DGF (5 days vs 4 days, P = .71) and the number of dialysis treatments (2 vs 2, P = .83) were similar between the groups. However, the median number of CNI dose adjustments during the study period in the Envarsus group was significantly lower (3 vs 4, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Envarsus patients had less fluctuation in the CNI level, requiring fewer CNI dose adjustments. However, there were no differences in the DGF recovery duration or number of dialysis treatments.

Delayed Graft Function Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and BK Viremia

Background

Delayed graft function (DGF) among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) is a well-known risk factor for allograft rejection, decreased graft survival, and increased cost. Although DGF is associated with an increased risk of rejection, it is unclear whether it also increases the risk of infection.

Methods

We reviewed all adult DDKTRs at our center between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcomes of interest were BK viremia, cytomegalovirus viremia, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection (UTI) within the first year of transplant. Additional analysis was made with censoring follow-up at the time of allograft rejection.

Results

A total of 1512 DDKTRs were included, of whom 468 (31%) had DGF. As expected, several recipient, donor, and baseline immunological characteristics differed by DGF status. After adjustment, DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of BK viremia (hazard ratio: 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.81; P = 0.049) and UTI (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.19; P < 0.001) but not cytomegalovirus viremia or pneumonia. Associations were similar in models censored at the time of rejection.

Conclusions

DGF is associated with an increased risk of early infectious complications, mainly UTI and BK viremia. Close monitoring and appropriate management are warranted for better outcomes in this unique population.

Past, Current, and Future Perspectives on Transplanting Acute Kidney Injury Kidneys

(1) Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys have high non-utilization rates due to concerns regarding unfavorable outcomes. In this paper, we aimed to review the past, present, and future opinions on AKI kidneys. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for topics relevant to AKI kidney transplantation. (3) Results: Current short- and long-term data on AKI kidneys have demonstrated good outcomes including favorable graft function and survival. The role of procurement biopsies is controversial, but they have been shown to be beneficial in AKI kidneys by allowing clinicians to differentiate between reversible tubular injury and irreversible cortical necrosis. Machine perfusion has also been applied to AKI kidneys and has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF). The incidence of DGF increases with AKI severity and its management can be challenging. Strategies employed to counteract this have included early initiation of dialysis after kidney transplantation, early targeting of adequate immunosuppression levels to minimize rejection risk, and establishment of outpatient dialysis. (4) Conclusions: Despite good outcomes, there continue to be barriers that impact AKI kidney utilization. Successful strategies have included use of procurement biopsies or machine perfusion and expectant management of DGF. With increasing experience, better use of AKI kidneys can result in additional opportunities to expand the donor pool.

Balanced crystalloid solution versus saline in deceased donor kidney transplantation (BEST-Fluids): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major adverse complication of deceased donor kidney transplantation. Intravenous fluids are routinely given to patients receiving a transplant to maintain intravascular volume and optimise graft function. Saline (0·9% sodium chloride) is widely used but might increase the risk of DGF due to its high chloride content. We aimed to test our hypothesis that using a balanced low-chloride crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) instead of saline would reduce the incidence of DGF.

METHODS

BEST-Fluids was a pragmatic, registry-embedded, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial at 16 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adults and children of any age receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant were eligible; those receiving a multi-organ transplant or weighing less than 20 kg were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an adaptive minimisation algorithm to intravenous balanced crystalloid solution (Plasma-Lyte 148) or saline during surgery and up until 48 h after transplantation. Trial fluids were supplied in identical bags and clinicians determined the fluid volume, rate, and time of discontinuation. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as receiving dialysis within 7 days after transplantation. All participants who consented and received a transplant were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned eligible participants who commenced surgery and received trial fluids, whether or not they received a transplant. This study is registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, (ACTRN12617000358347), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03829488).

FINDINGS

Between Jan 26, 2018, and Aug 10, 2020, 808 participants were randomly assigned to balanced crystalloid (n=404) or saline (n=404) and received a transplant (512 [63%] were male and 296 [37%] were female). One participant in the saline group withdrew before 7 days and was excluded, leaving 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group and 403 in the saline group that were included in the primary analysis. DGF occurred in 121 (30%) of 404 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus 160 (40%) of 403 in the saline group (adjusted relative risk 0·74 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·84; p<0·0001]; adjusted risk difference 10·1% [95% CI 3·5 to 16·6]). In the safety analysis, numbers of investigator-reported serious adverse events were similar in both groups, being reported in three (<1%) of 406 participants in the balanced crystalloid group versus five (1%) of 409 participants in the saline group (adjusted risk difference -0·5%, 95% CI -1·8 to 0·9; p=0·48).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant, intravenous fluid therapy with balanced crystalloid solution reduced the incidence of DGF compared with saline. Balanced crystalloid solution should be the standard-of-care intravenous fluid used in deceased donor kidney transplantation.

FUNDING

Medical Research Future Fund and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Health Research Council (New Zealand), Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Baxter.

The Trend of Serum Creatinine Does Not Predict Follow-Up Biopsy Findings Among Kidney Transplant Recipients With Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Traditionally, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been suspected mainly by a rise in serum creatinine (Scr) and confirmed by allograft biopsy. There is limited literature describing the trend of Scr after treatment, and how that trend might differ between patients with histological response and with no response to treatment.

Methods

We included all cases of AMR at our program between March 2016 and July 2020 who had a follow-up biopsy after the index biopsy, with initial diagnosis of AMR. We trended the Scr and change in Scr (delta Scr) and its association with being a responder (microvascular inflammation, MVI ≤1) or nonresponder (MVI >1), as well as graft failure.

Results

A total of 183 kidney transplant recipients were included, 66 in the responder group and 177 in the nonresponder group. The MVI scores and sum chronicity scores, along with transplant glomerulopathy scores, were higher in the nonresponder group. However, Scr at index biopsy was similar in responders (1.74 ± 0.70) versus nonresponders (1.83 ± 0.65; P = 0.39), as were the delta Scr at various time points. After adjustment for multiple variables, delta Scr was not associated with being a nonresponder. Also, delta Scr value at follow-up biopsy compared with index biopsy among responders was 0 ± 0.67 (P = 0.99) and among nonresponders was -0.01 ± 0.61 (P = 0.89). Being a nonresponder was significantly associated with an increased risk of graft failure at the last follow-up in univariate analysis but was not in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-3.17; P = 0.49).

Conclusions

We found that Scr is not a good predictor of the resolution of MVI, supporting the utility of follow-up biopsies after treatment of AMR.

The current state of transplant advanced practice providers: results of the advanced practice provider practice survey

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are trained, licensed health care providers. The American Society of Transplant APP community of practice developed an electronic survey to investigate transplant APP demographics, scope of practice, and academic activities. We defined the top of scope of practice as delivering health care to the fullest extent of APP education and training as allowed by state laws and regulations. From July 11, 2020, to August 31, 2020, 307 invitations were e-mailed and survey links were distributed electronically on the community of practice hub and social media. Two hundred fifty-three APPs responded. APPs practice in inpatient and outpatient settings. Among the respondent APPs, 11.5% assist in the operating room (OR), 46.3% of inpatient and 46.6% of outpatient APPs perform procedures, and 17.8% run specialized APP clinics. 26.2% feel they do not function at the top of their scope of practice and 29.7% were expected to function as a coordinator some or all of the time. Forty-three percent gave invited lectures, 41.5% have published, and 69.2% teach physician trainees. 74.7% and 35.1%, respectively, would like to participate in research and teach but are limited by time, opportunity, and experience. APPs should practice at the top of their scope of practice. Clinical workloads and lack of time limit the ability of APP to teach and contribute to evidence-based practice.

Pre-transplant hypoalbuminemia is not associated with worse short-term outcomes among kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Serum albumin is an indicator of overall health status, but it remains unclear how pre-transplant hypoalbuminemia is associated with early post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This study included all adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) at our center from 01/01/2001-12/31/2017 with serum albumin measured within 30 days before transplantation. KTRs were grouped based on pretransplant albumin level normal (≥4.0 g/dL), mild (≥3.5 - < 4.0g/dL), moderate (≥3.0 - < 3.5g/dL), or severe hypoalbuminemia (<3.0g/dL). Outcomes of interest included: length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission within 30 days, delayed graft function(DGF), and re-operation related to post-transplant surgical complications. We also analyzed rejection, graft failure, and death within 6 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

A total of 2807 KTRs were included 43.6% had normal serum albumin, 35.3% mild, 16.6% moderate, and 4.5% severe hypoalbuminemia. Mild and moderate hypoalbuminemia were associated with a shorter LOS by 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 0.80 days (p = 0.01), respectively, compared to normal albumin. Moderate (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.37-0.91; p = 0.02) and severe hypoalbuminemia (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.68; p = 0.01) were associated with significantly lower rates of acute rejection within 6 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pre-transplant hypoalbuminemia have post-transplant outcomes similar to those with normal serum albumin, but with a lower risk of acute rejection based on the degree of hypoalbuminemia.

Delayed graft function: current status and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Delayed graft function is a common early posttransplant event predictive of adverse outcomes including hospital readmission, impaired long-term graft function, and decreased graft and patient survival. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature describing delayed graft function in hopes of better understanding and managing this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research efforts have been garnered towards risk factor modification, prevention, and earlier detection of delayed graft function. In this review, we aim to summarize current innovative approaches and future directions.

SUMMARY

Delayed graft function portends worse graft and patient outcomes. Continued research to prevent, and detect early perturbations in allograft function, and more optimally manage this disease will hopefully improve graft function, along with graft/patient survival.

Best practices during COVID-19 pandemic in solid organ transplant programs in Spain

Clinical management of transplant patients abruptly changed during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020). The new situation led to very significant challenges, such as new forms of relationship between healthcare providers and patients and other professionals, design of protocols to prevent disease transmission and treatment of infected patients, management of waiting lists and of transplant programs during state/city lockdown, relevant reduction of medical training and educational activities, halt or delays of ongoing research, etc. The two main objectives of the current report are: 1) to promote a project of best practices in transplantation taking advantage of the knowledge and experience acquired by professionals during the evolving situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, both in performing their usual care activity, as well as in the adjustments taken to adapt to the clinical context, and 2) to create a document that collects these best practices, thus allowing the creation of a useful compendium for the exchange of knowledge between different Transplant Units. The scientific committee and expert panel finally standardized 30 best practices, including for the pretransplant period (n = 9), peritransplant period (n = 7), postransplant period (n = 8) and training and communication (n = 6). Many aspects of hospitals and units networking, telematic approaches, patient care, value-based medicine, hospitalization, and outpatient visit strategies, training for novelties and communication skills were covered. Massive vaccination has greatly improved the outcomes of the pandemic, with a decrease in severe cases requiring intensive care and a reduction in mortality. However, suboptimal responses to vaccines have been observed in transplant recipients, and health care strategic plans are necessary in these vulnerable populations. The best practices contained in this expert panel report may aid to their broader implementation.

Analysis of individual components of frailty: Pre-transplant grip strength is the strongest predictor of post kidney transplant outcomes

Frailty is commonly assessed during kidney transplant recipient (KTR) evaluation. However, individual frailty components may have varying impact on post-transplant outcomes. In this single-center study of 825 KTRs, we determined the association between the individual components of a modified Fried frailty score and delayed graft function (DGF), early hospital readmission (EHR), cardiovascular (CV) events, acute rejection (AR), death censored graft failure (DCGF), and death. Sum frailty ≥3 was significantly associated with EHR (aOR = 3.62; 95% CI: 1.21-10.80). Among individual components, only grip strength was significantly associated with EHR (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.03-2.31). The addition of grip strength to a model with the other four components resulted in Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 20.51% (p = .01). Similarly, only grip strength was significantly associated with CV events (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.12-2.86). The addition of grip strength to a model with the other four components resulted in NRI of 27.37% (p = .006). No other frailty components were associated with the outcomes of interest. Based on our findings, handgrip strength may be an important tool while assessing frailty, mainly predicting early readmission and cardiovascular events post-transplant.

In kidney recipients from the same deceased donor, discordance in delayed graft function is associated with the worst outcomes

Delayed graft function(DGF) is a common complication among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients(DDKTs) and is associated with worse outcomes. The effect on outcomes of concordance versus discordance in DGF between two different recipients of kidneys from the same donor is largely unknown. We reviewed all adult DDKTs for which both kidneys were transplanted to two different recipients at our center between 2014-2019. DDKTs were divided into four groups based on the DGF status: concordance no DGF(cc-no-DGF); discordance no DGF(dd-no-DGF); discordance DGF(dd-DGF) and concordance in DGF(cc-DGF). Acute rejection (AR) and death censored graft failure (DCGF) were outcomes of interest. A total of 578 DDKTs fulfilled our selection criteria, 280 were in cc-no-DGF, 83 in dd-no-DGF, 83 in dd-DGF, and 132 in cc-DGF. Compared to cc-no-DGF, in univariate analysis, dd-DGF was associated with an increased risk of AR(HR:1.60; 95% CI:1.0-2.56) but cc-DGF was not(HR:1.01; 95% CI:0.63-1.62). dd-DGF was not associated with an increased risk of AR in multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, dd-DGF was associated with an increased risk of DCGF (HR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.05-6.93) but cc-DGF was not (HR:2.36; 95% CI:0.97-5.70). Discordance in DGF is associated with worse outcomes and may need close follow-up and monitoring to improve the outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Continuation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been used increasingly in past decade. Many of these patients undergo transplantation and may require dialysis for delayed graft function (DGF). The outcomes of DGF based on the post-transplantation dialysis modality are not well known.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health who developed DGF between November 2015 and April 2019. Patients were divided into those who received hemodialysis (HD) or PD during the DGF period. Immediate graft explant, DGF among living donor KTRs, or those requiring just a single dialysis treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 224 KTRs with DGF during the study period, 167 fulfilled our selection criteria. There were 16 patients in the PD and 151 in the HD group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, except diabetes was more prevalent in the HD group. Five of 16 PD patients had to be transitioned to HD. There was no difference in DGF duration, hospital length of stay, infectious or surgical complications, rejection at various time periods, graft function at last follow-up, or graft failure. In multivariate analysis, only rejection within the first year of transplantation (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-15.08; P = 0.02) and post-surgical complications (HR: 3.79; 95% CI: 1.03- 13.91; P = 0.04) were associated with death-censored graft failure (DCGF). The use of PD for treatment of DGF was not associated with DCGF.

CONCLUSIONS

In carefully selected patients, PD can be continued safely for DGF without any effect on short-term or long-term transplant outcomes.

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.

A Review of Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Posttransplant Outcomes

Although over 90 000 people are on the kidney transplant waitlist in the United States, some kidneys that are viable for transplantation are discarded. Transplant surgeons are more likely to discard deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) versus without AKI (30% versus 18%). AKI is defined using changes in creatinine from baseline. Transplant surgeons can use DonorNet data, including admission, peak, and terminal serum creatinine, and biopsy data when available to differentiate kidneys with AKI from those with chronic injury. Although chronic kidney disease is associated with reduced graft survival, an abundance of literature has demonstrated similar graft survival for deceased donors with AKI versus donors without AKI. Donors with AKI are more likely to undergo delayed graft function but have similar long-term outcomes as donors without AKI. The mechanism for similar graft survival is unclear. Some hypothesized mechanisms include (1) ischemic preconditioning; (2) posttransplant and host factors playing a greater role in long-term survival than donor factors; and (3) selection bias of transplanting only relatively healthy donor kidneys with AKI. Existing literature suggests transplanting more donor kidneys with stage 1 and 2 AKI, and cautious utilization of stage 3 AKI donors, may increase the pool of viable kidneys. Doing so can reduce the number of people who die on the waitlist by over 500 every year.

"Early" and "Late" Hospital readmissions in the first year after kidney transplant at a single center

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmission (HR) after surgery is considered a quality metric.

METHODS

Data on 2371 first-time adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients were collected to analyze the "early" (≤30 days) and "late" (31-365 days) HR patterns after KT at a single center over a 12-year time span (2002-2013).

RESULTS

30-day, 90-day, and 1-year HR were 31%, 41%, and 53%, respectively. Risk factors for HR included age >50, female sex, black race, BMI >30, transplant LOS >5 days, and pre-transplant time on dialysis >765 days. Indications for early (n = 749) and late (n = 508) HR were similar. Early HR (OR: 3.80, P = .007) and black race (OR: 2.38, P = .009) were associated with higher odds of 1-year graft failure while frequency (1-2, 3-4, 5+) of HR (ORs: 4.68, 8.36, 9.44, P < .001) and age > 50 (OR: 2.11, P = .007) were associated with higher odds of 1-year mortality. Transplant LOS > 5 days increased both odds of 1-year graft failure (OR: 3.51, P = .001) and mortality (OR: 2.05, P = .006). One-year graft and recipient survival were 96.7% and 94.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital readmission was associated with reduced graft and patient survival; however, despite a relatively high and consistent HR rate after KT, overall 1-year graft and patient survival was high.

Blessing and a curse of outpatient management of delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication occurring most often after deceased donor kidney transplant with several donor characteristics as well as immunologic factors that lead to its development post-transplant. These patients require dialysis and close kidney function monitoring until sufficient allograft function is achieved. This has resulted in limited options for DGF management, either prolonged hospitalization until graft function improves to the point where dialysis is no longer needed or discharge back to their home dialysis unit with periodic follow up in the transplant clinic. DGF is associated with a higher risk for acute rejection, premature graft failure, and 30-d readmission; therefore, these patients need close monitoring, immunosuppression management, and prompt allograft biopsy if prolonged DGF is observed. This may not occur if these patients are discharged back to their home dialysis unit. To address this issue, the University of Wisconsin-Madison created a clinic in 2011 specialized in outpatient DGF management. This clinic was able to successfully reduce hospital length of stay without an increase in 30-d readmission, graft loss, and patient death.

Two-year management after renal transplantation in 2013 in France: Input from the French national health system database

The objective of this study was to describe the management of patients undergoing renal transplantation in 2013 and over the following two years on the basis of healthcare consumption data. The National Health Insurance Information System was used to identify 1876 general scheme beneficiaries undergoing a first isolated renal transplantation (median age: 53 years; men 63%). Overall, 1.2% of patients died during the transplantation hospital stay (>65 years 3.3%) and 87% of patients had a functional graft at 2 years. Thirty-three percent of patients were readmitted to hospital for 1 day or longer during the first month, 73% the first year and 55% the second year. At least 10% of patients were hospitalised for antirejection treatment during the first quarter after renal transplantation, 16% the first year and 9% the second year. The first year, 32% of patients were hospitalised for renal disease (12% the second year), 14% were hospitalised for cardiovascular disease (9% the second year), 13% for infectious disease (5% the second year) and 2% for a malignant tumour (2% the second year). Almost 80% of patients consulted their general practitioner each year (almost 50% consulted every quarter). During the second year, 83% of patients were taking antihypertensives, 45% lipid-lowering drugs, 26% antidiabetic drugs, 77% tacrolimus, 18% ciclosporin, 88% mycophenolic acid and 69% corticosteroids. This study highlights the important contribution of healthcare consumption data to a better understanding of the modalities of management of renal transplant recipients in France, allowing improvement of this management in line with guidelines.

The prognostic value of the furosemide stress test in predicting delayed graft function following deceased donor kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

The Furosemide Stress Test (FST) is a novel dynamic assessment of tubular function that has been shown in preliminary studies to predict patients who will progress to advanced stage acute kidney injury, including those who receive renal replacement therapy (RRT). The aim of this study is to investigate if the urinary response to a single intraoperative dose of intravenous furosemide predicts delayed graft function (DGF) in patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplant.

RESULTS

On an adjusted multiple logistic regression, a single 100 mg dose of intraoperative furosemide after the anastomosis of the renal vessels (FST) predicted the need for RRT at 2 and 6 h post kidney transplantation (KT). Recipient urinary output was measured at 2 and 6 h post furosemide administration. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the FST predicted DGF with an area-under-the curve of 0.85 at an optimal urinary output cut-off of <600 mls at 6 h with a sensitivity of and a specificity of 83% and 74%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FST is a predictor of DGF post kidney transplant and has the potential to identify patients requiring RRT early after KT.