Antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric small bowel transplantation: Capillaritis is a major determinant of C4d positivity in intestinal transplant biopsies

Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods

The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.

Evaluation of serial monitoring of donor-specific antibodies in pediatric and adult intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The study purpose was to add to limited literature assessing anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) appearance, clearance, specificity, and impact in intestinal/multivisceral (MV) transplant as well as the value of serial monitoring following an institutional protocol shift implementing serial monitoring.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective review included intestinal/MV recipients transplanted 1/1/15-9/31/17 with completed DSA testing. Patients were divided into groups based on DSA presence post-transplant. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Secondary outcomes included graft loss and death. Descriptive analysis of DSA was completed.

RESULTS

Of the 35 intestinal/MV recipients (60% pediatric) with DSA testing, 24 patients had post-transplant DSA. Fifteen patients in the DSA(+) group had T-cell-mediated BPAR versus five in the DSA(-) group (63% vs 45%, p = .47). Days to BPAR were 25 [IQR 19-165] (DSA(+) group) versus 232 [IQR 25.5-632.5] (DSA(-) group) (p = .066). There were no differences between groups for graft loss or death. One hundred and five DSA were identified in the DSA(+) group with 63% being class II, and 54% cleared during follow-up. DSA were directed against 50 different HLA alleles, with the most common being directed against HLA- DQ (35%). Time to first DSA and to clearance did not differ between class I and II.

CONCLUSION

Findings confirm previous data that suggest post-transplant DSA in this population may lead to increased BPAR or shorter time to BPAR, although not statistically significant. Most DSA were identified within the first month after transplant, and ahead of rejection identification on biopsy. DSA therefore may have utility as an early rejection biomarker and use may be considered in place of early protocol biopsies, particularly in pediatric patients. We identified novel findings of DSA directed against a large breadth of HLA in intestinal/MV patients.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

The Importance Of Avoiding Time-Dependent Bias When Testing The Prognostic Value Of An Intervening Event - Two Acute Cellular Rejection Examples In Intestinal Transplantation

In testing the prognostic value of the occurrence of an intervening event (clinical event that occurs post-transplant), 3 proper statistical methodologies for testing its prognostic value exist (time dependent covariate, landmark, and semi-Markov modelling methods). However, time-dependent bias has appeared in many clinical reports, whereby the intervening event is statistically treated as a baseline variable (as if it occurred at transplant). Using a single-center cohort of 445 intestinal transplant cases to test the prognostic value of 1^st acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe (grade of) ACR on the hazard rate of developing graft loss, we demonstrate how the inclusion of such time-dependent bias can lead to severe underestimation of the true hazard ratio (HR). The (statistically more powerful) time dependent covariate method in Cox's multivariable model yielded significantly unfavorable effects of 1^st ACR (P<.0001; HR=2.492) and severe ACR (P<.0001; HR=4.531). In contrast, when using the time-dependent biased approach, multivariable analysis yielded an incorrect conclusion for the prognostic value of 1^st ACR (P=.31, HR=0.877, 35.2% of 2.492) and a much smaller estimated effect of severe ACR (P=.0008; HR=1.589; 35.1% of 4.531). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of avoiding time-dependent bias when testing the prognostic value of an intervening event.

Inverted direct allorecognition triggers early donor-specific antibody responses after transplantation

The generation of antibodies against donor-specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, a type of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), after transplantation requires that recipient's allospecific B cells receive help from T cells. The current dogma holds that this help is exclusively provided by the recipient's CD4+ T cells that recognize complexes of recipient's MHC II molecules and peptides derived from donor-specific MHC alloantigens, a process called indirect allorecognition. Here, we demonstrated that, after allogeneic heart transplantation, CD3ε knockout recipient mice lacking T cells generate a rapid, transient wave of switched alloantibodies, predominantly directed against MHC I molecules. This is due to the presence of donor CD4+ T cells within the graft that recognize intact recipient's MHC II molecules expressed by B cell receptor-activated allospecific B cells. Indirect evidence suggests that this inverted direct pathway is also operant in patients after transplantation. Resident memory donor CD4+ T cells were observed in perfusion liquids of human renal and lung grafts and acquired B cell helper functions upon in vitro stimulation. Furthermore, T follicular helper cells, specialized in helping B cells, were abundant in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of lung and intestinal grafts. In the latter, more graft-derived passenger T cells correlated with the detection of donor T cells in recipient's circulation; this, in turn, was associated with an early transient anti-MHC I DSA response and worse transplantation outcomes. We conclude that this inverted direct allorecognition is a possible explanation for the early transient anti-MHC DSA responses frequently observed after lung or intestinal transplantations.

Potential importance of early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in intestinal transplant patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Predispositions for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are age, immunosuppression, and co-morbidity. High levels of maintenance immunosuppression render intestinal transplant (ITx) patients vulnerable for severe COVID-19. COVID-19 also provokes several gastroenterological pathologies which have not been discussed in ITx, so far.

CASE SUMMARY

During the second European COVID-19 wave in November 2020, an ITx recipient was admitted to the hospital because of electrolyte disturbances due to dehydration. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, azathioprine, and low-dose corticosteroids. During hospitalization, she tested positive on screening COVID-19 nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction swab, while her initial test was negative. She was initially asymptomatic and had normal inflammatory markers. Tacrolimus levels were slightly raised, as Azathioprine was temporarily halted. Due to elevated D-dimers at that time, prophylactic low-molecular weight heparin was started. Seven days after the positive test, dyspnea, anosmia, and C-reactive protein increase (25 mg/L) were noted. Remdesivir was administered during 5 d in total. High stomal output was noted in two consecutive days and several days thereafter. To exclude infection or rejection, an ileoscopy and biopsy were performed and excluded these. Four weeks later, she was discharged from the hospital and remains in good health since then.

CONCLUSION

Early eradication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in ITx recipients may be warranted to prevent acute rejection provocation by it.

The role of endoscopy in the small intestinal transplant recipient: A review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure who have developed life-threatening complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Patients may also undergo ITx as part of a combined liver-intestine or multivisceral transplant for a variety of indications, most commonly intestinal failure-associated liver disease or porto-mesenteric thrombosis. Endoscopy plays a critical role in the posttransplant management of these patients, most commonly in the diagnosis and management of rejection, which occurs in up to 30-40% of patients within the first-year posttransplant. With a lack of noninvasive biomarkers to identify the presence of rejection, endoscopy and biopsy remain the gold standard for its diagnosis. Endoscopic evaluation of the graft is also important in the identification of other complications post-ITx, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-versus-host disease, and enteric infections. Each patient's posttransplant anatomy may be slightly different, making endoscopy sometimes technically challenging and necessitating clear and frequent communication with the surgical team in order to help identify the highest yield approach. Herein, we review the most common pathologies found endoscopically in the post-ITx patient and describe some of the unique challenges the endoscopist faces when evaluating these complex patients.

Donor-specific antibody and sensitized patients in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It has been well established that antibody to donor HLA pretransplant and the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies posttransplant contribute to inferior graft survival outcomes. This article serves to review the current status of the management of pretransplant sensitized intestinal transplant candidate as well as to review posttransplant care of patients that harbor antidonor HLA antibodies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The intestinal transplant candidate oftentimes presents for transplant listing with high levels of anti-HLA antibodies that necessitate a careful preoperative strategy to avoid a donor-recipient pair that would result in a positive crossmatch. In the end, donor intestine offer acceptance is based on a balance between recipient clinical needs and allowable immunologic risk tolerance. The use of virtual crossmatching (VXM) enables the transplant center to effectively gauge the immunologic risk of each potential donor-recipient pair far in advance of allocating resources toward pursuing a donor organ. In those candidates with high levels of preformed donor anti-HLA antibodies, desensitization with a novel technique of donor splenic perfusion has been described as well as a single-center experience with a conventional desensitizing protocol. Posttransplant, with the use of a denovo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) monitoring and treatment protocol, the well known deleterious effects of dnDSA can potentially be ameliorated, thus improving outcome. Efforts to establish a formal histologic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the intestinal graft continues to evolve with recent findings describing the relationship between DSA and histopathologic findings.

SUMMARY

Techniques such as the use of VXM, novel desensitization methods and protocols, monitoring and eradicating dnDSA, along with establishing new criteria for ABMR have all contributed to improving the outcomes in transplanting the immunologically challenging intestine.

Current status of pediatric intestinal transplant in Europe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review features articles published during 2018 and 2019 regarding pediatric visceral transplantation in Europe. In this biannual review, the authors identify and summarize key articles pertinent to clinical and research areas.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a trend to a lower use of intestinal transplantation in pediatric population in Europe. Most articles were focused in long-term follow-up. The burden of the disease 10 years after intestinal transplantation is still significant, including the need of several medications, readmissions, and the need of specific follow-up, mostly because of psychiatric problems. Regarding eating behaviors, promoting eating pretransplant may be protective and there may be eating difficulty predictors that could be used to facilitate targeted interventions. Two different articles were consistent in the identification of C1q-fixing DSA as a marker of poor outcome, and capillaritis was identified as a predictor of C4d positivity in intestinal graft biopsies. The inclusion of the liver emerged as the main protective factor against dnDSA development. The incidence of PTLD (specially the monomorphic type) was significantly higher following ITx than after LTx (14.9 vs. 2.8%). The European societies and the EU have made an effort to promote networking, collaborative registries, and sharing of knowledge in pediatric transplantation.

SUMMARY

Recent articles focused mostly on long-term follow-up issues, although translational research has also been sustained by some groups.

Donor-Specific Antibodies in Pediatric Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: The Role of Liver and Human Leukocyte Antigen Mismatching

Rejection is one of the most important drawbacks for graft and patient survival in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. However, there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria for humoral rejection, and the literature about the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) on allograft outcome and the risk factors that contribute to their development is scant with contradictory results. The present study analyzes the role of DSA exclusively in a pediatric cohort of 43 transplants. Among our patients, 11.6% showed preformed DSA, but they did not correlate with more rejection or less allograft survival. Having previous transplants was the main sensitization factor with an odds ratio (OR) = 44.85 (P = 0.001). In total, 16.3% of recipients developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), mostly directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II, polyspecific and complement fixing. Additionally, the presence of dnDSA had a deleterious effect on graft rejection (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.00; P = 0.01) and survival (HR = 66.52; P < 0.001) in an observational period of 5 years after transplantation. The inclusion of the liver emerged as the main protective factor against dnDSA development with an OR = 0.07 (P = 0.007). The analysis of HLA compatibility at the serological and epitope level with the computational tools HLAMatchmaker and PIRCHE revealed no association between HLA mismatching and dnDSA. In conclusion, this study performed in pediatric recipients shows the deleterious effect of dnDSA on intestinal transplantation supported by the complement-fixing activity observed. Additionally, the liver inclusion in the allografts showed to be a protective factor against dnDSA generation.