Comparing everolimus-based immunosuppression with reduction or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor reduction from six months after heart transplantation: the randomized MANDELA study

Increase of Cardiac Autoantibodies Against Beta-2-adrenergic Receptor During Acute Cellular Heart Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) in heart transplant (HTx) recipients may be accompanied by cardiac cell damage with subsequent exposure to cardiac autoantigens and the production of cardiac autoantibodies (aABs). This study aimed to evaluate a peptide array screening approach for cardiac aABs in HTx recipients during ACR (ACR-HTx).

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center observational study, sera from 37 HTx recipients, as well as age and sex-matched healthy subjects were screened for a total of 130 cardiac aABs of partially overlapping peptide sequences directed against structural proteins using a peptide array approach.

RESULTS

In ACR-HTx, troponin I (TnI) serum levels were found to be elevated. Here, we could identify aABs against beta-2-adrenergic receptor (β-2AR: EAINCYANETCCDFFTNQAY) to be upregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 0.80 versus 1.31, P = 0.0413). Likewise, patients positive for β-2AR aABs showed higher TnI serum levels during ACR compared with aAB negative patients (10.0 versus 30.0 ng/L, P = 0.0375). Surprisingly, aABs against a sequence of troponin I (TnI: QKIFDLRGKFKRPTLRRV) were found to be downregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 3.49 versus 1.13, P = 0.0025). A comparison in healthy subjects showed the same TnI sequence to be upregulated in non-ACR-HTx (intensities: 2.19 versus 3.49, P = 0.0205), whereas the majority of aABs were suppressed in non-ACR-HTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study served as a feasibility analysis for a peptide array screening approach in HTx recipients during ACR and identified 2 different regulated aABs in ACR-HTx. Hence, further multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of aAB testing and diagnostic or therapeutic consequences.

Impact of Everolimus Initiation and Corticosteroid Weaning During Acute Phase After Heart Transplantation on Clinical Outcome: Data from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY)

The effect of changes in immunosuppressive therapy during the acute phase post-heart transplantation (HTx) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of changes in immunosuppressive therapy by corticosteroid (CS) weaning and everolimus (EVR) initiation during the first year post-HTx on clinical outcomes. We analyzed 622 recipients registered in the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) between January 2014 and December 2021. The median age at HTx was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR], 45-62), and the median follow-up time was 3.9 years (IQR 2.0-5.1). The early EVR initiation within the first year post-HTx and maintenance during the follow-up is associated with reduced the risk of primary composite outcome (all-cause mortality or re-transplantation) (HR, 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.68; p < 0.001) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (HR, 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p = 0.009) compared with EVR-free or EVR intermittent treatment regimen, regardless of CS weaning. However, the early EVR initiation tends to increase the risk of acute allograft rejection compared with EVR-free or EVR intermittent treatment.

Pharmacotherapy in the heart transplant recipient: A primer for nurse clinicians and pharmacists

Heart transplantation (HT) is the definitive treatment for eligible patients with end-stage heart disease. A major complication of HT is allograft rejection which can lead to graft dysfunction and death. The guiding principle of chronic immunosuppression therapy is to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ while avoiding oversuppression of the immune system, which can cause opportunistic infections and malignancy. The purpose of this review is to describe immunosuppressive management of the HT recipient-including agent-specific pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, outcomes data, adverse effects, clinical considerations, and recent guideline updates. We will also provide recommendations for medical prophylaxis of immunosuppressed patients based on the most recent clinical guidelines. Additionally, we highlight the importance of medical therapy adherence and the effect of social determinants of health on the long-term management of HT. HT recipients are a complex and high-risk population. The objective of this review is to describe basic pharmacotherapy in HT and implications for nurses and pharmacists.

Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation (HTx) remains the last therapeutic resort for patients with advanced heart failure. The present work is a clinically focused review discussing current issues in heart transplantation. Several factors have been associated with the outcome of HTx, such as ABO and HLA compatibility, graft size, ischemic time, age, infections, and the cause of death, as well as imaging and laboratory tests. In 2018, UNOS changed the organ allocation policy for HTx. The aim of this change was to prioritize patients with a more severe clinical condition resulting in a reduction in mortality of people on the waiting list. Advanced heart failure and resistant angina are among the main indications of HTx, whereas active infection, peripheral vascular disease, malignancies, and increased body mass index (BMI) are important contraindications. The main complications of HTx include graft rejection, graft angiopathy, primary graft failure, infection, neoplasms, and retransplantation. Recent advances in the field of HTx include the first two porcine-to-human xenotransplantations, the inclusion of hepatitis C donors, donation after circulatory death, novel monitoring for acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, and advances in donor heart preservation and transportation. Lastly, novel immunosuppression therapies such as daratumumab, belatacept, IL 6 directed therapy, and IgG endopeptidase have shown promising results.

Understanding and Investigating Sex-Based Differences in Heart Transplantation: A Call to Action

Women represent only about 25% of heart transplant recipients annually. Although the number of women living with advanced heart failure remains unknown, epidemiologic research suggests that more women should be receiving advanced heart failure therapies. Sex differences in risk factors, presentation, response to pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in heart failure have been well described. Yet, less is known about sex differences in heart transplant candidate selection, waitlist management, donor selection, perioperative considerations, and post-transplant management and outcomes. The purpose of this review was to summarize the existing published reports related to sex differences in heart transplantation, highlighting areas in which sex-based considerations are well described and supported by available evidence, and emphasizing topics that require further study.

Dual-Organ Transplantation: Indications, Evaluation, and Outcomes for Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for appropriate patients with advanced heart failure, the presence of concomitant renal or hepatic dysfunction can pose a barrier to isolated heart transplantation. Because donor organ supply limits the availability of organ transplantation, appropriate allocation of this scarce resource is essential; thus, clear guidance for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation is urgently required. The purposes of this scientific statement are (1) to describe the impact of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction on posttransplantation outcomes; (2) to discuss the assessment of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction; (3) to provide an approach to patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation and posttransplantation management; and (4) to explore the ethics of multiorgan transplantation.

Post-transplant ejection fraction and renal failure in cardiac transplant recipients: An analysis of the OPTN database

BACKGROUND

Despite improved life expectancy from a heart transplant, transplant recipients remain at high risk for renal dysfunction and failure, including end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The onset of ESKD is a poor prognostic marker and is associated with increased mortality in this setting, as in others. There is a need to identify risk factors for ESKD among heart transplant recipients in contemporary settings.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of adult heart transplant recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2021 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. 22 737 adult recipients of heart transplants alone were included in this analysis. We examined LVEF measured 1 year after transplant, and LVEF updated annually for association with ESKD using multivariate Cox regression models.

RESULTS

LVEF at 1-year after transplant was associated with ESKD in multivariate models (Hazard Ratio 1.33 per 10-unit decrease, 95% CI 1.23-1.43, p < .001). In multivariate models using categorized LVEF, mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF 40%-50%) was associated with ESKD (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.45-2.14, p < .001), as was reduced ejection fraction (EF < 40%, HR 2.86, 95% CI 2.01-4.07, p < .001), relative to individuals with preserved ejection fraction (EF > 50%). These associations were consistent when using annually updated ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant left ventricular ejection fraction has value in predicting end stage kidney disease among adults who receive heart transplants alone. LVEF is routinely measured as part of contemporary post heart transplant care, and a diminished LVEF should signal to clinicians that a recipient is at increased risk of renal failure.

Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Early mTOR Inhibitor Use After Heart Transplantation: Insights From the UNOS Database

Background

The clinical characteristics of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors use in heart transplant recipients and their outcomes have not been well described.

Methods and Results

We compared patients who received mTOR inhibitors within the first 2 years after heart transplantation to patients who did not by inquiring the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between 2010 and 2018. The primary end point was all‐cause mortality with retransplantation as a competing event. Rejection, malignancy, hospitalization for infection, and renal transplantation were secondary end points. There were 1619 (9%) and 15 686 (81%) mTOR inhibitors+ and mTOR inhibitors− patients, respectively. Body mass index, induction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, calculated panel reactive antibody, and fewer days in 1A status were independently associated with mTOR inhibitors+ status. Over a follow‐up of 10.4 years, there was no difference in all‐cause mortality after adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.03 [0.90–1.19]; P=0.66). mTOR inhibitors+ were independently associated with increased risk for rejection (odds ratio [OR], 1.43 [1.11–1.83]; P=0.005) and basal skin cancer (OR, 1.35 [1.19–1.51]; P=0.012) but not for infection or renal transplantation.

Conclusions

mTOR inhibitors are used in <10% patients in the first 2 years after heart transplantation and are noninferior to contemporary immunosuppression regimens in terms of all‐cause mortality, infection, malignancy, or renal transplantation. They are associated with risk for rejection.

Maintenance immunosuppression in heart transplantation: insights from network meta-analysis of various immunosuppression regimens

Previous studies have reported superiority of mechanistic target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) antagonists (mTA) over calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as part of maintenance immunosuppression (IS) in mitigating cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation (HT). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through October 2019 for studies comparing maintenance IS with mTA + antimetabolites (AM), CNI + mTA or CNI + AM post HT. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality, CAV, acute rejection, CMV infections, and change in eGFR. To compare different IS antagonists, a random-effects network meta-analysis was performed. We used p-scores to rank best treatments per outcome. Our search identified fifteen eligible studies (5 studies comparing mTA + AM vs. CNI + AM, 9 comparing CNI + mTA vs. CNI + AM, 1 comparing mTA + AM vs. CNI + mTA, 8 using everolimus and 7 sirolimus as mTA) reporting the selected outcomes. We did not identify any statistical difference in all-cause mortality among the three IS regimens without heterogeneity among studies. CAV rates were significantly lower with CNI + mTA (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.92). Acute rejection rates were significantly lower with CNI + AM (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.56) and with CNI + mTA (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.33) compared with mTA + AM without significant heterogeneity (I² = 43%, p = 0.9). CMV infections were significantly lower with mTA + AM (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.46) and with CNI + mTA (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.2-0.38) compared with CNI + AM without heterogeneity. mTA + AM led to higher eGFR compared with CNI + AM (9.06 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 3.15-14.97) and CNI + Mta (9.64 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.91-18.36), but the heterogeneity among studies was significant. CNI + mTA ranked better for CAV (p = 0.78), and acute rejection (p = 0.99) while mTA + AM for CMV infection (p = 0.94) and improvement in renal function (p = 0.93) than other regimens. Different IS regimens have similar effects on survival post HT, but CNI + mTA was associated with lower CAV rates, and acute rejection, while mTA + AM with less CMV infection post HT.

Effectiveness of Prophylactic Human Cytomegalovirus Hyperimmunoglobulin in Preventing Cytomegalovirus Infection following Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common infection occurring in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CMV-specific hyperimmunoglobulin (CMVIG) has been used for the past four decades and is typically administered either prophylactically or pre-emptively. The present meta-analysis evaluated CMV infection rates in SOT patients who received prophylactic CMVIG. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to October 2021. The primary endpoint was CMV infection rate. Thirty-two SOT studies were identified (n = 1521 CMVIG-treated and n = 1196 controls). Prophylactic CMVIG treatment was often associated with a lower risk of CMV infection in transplant recipients. The average CMV infection rate was 35.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.4−38.2%) in patients treated prophylactically with CMVIG and 41.4% (95% CI: 38.6−44.2%) in the control group not receiving CMVIG (p = 0.003). Similar results were observed in analyses limited to publications evaluating currently available CMVIG products (Cytotect CP and Cytogam; p < 0.001). In combination with the established safety profile for CMVIG, these results suggest that prophylactic CMVIG treatment in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation may be beneficial, particularly in those at high risk of CMV infection or disease.

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors

Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are macrocyclic lactone antibiotics derived from Streptomyces hygroscopicus that prevent T lymphocyte activation and B cell differentiation. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) that inhibit cytokine production, mTOR inhibitors block the cytokine signal transduction to arrest cells in the G1 to S phase. This class of drugs is commonly used for post-transplantation and cancer management because of its immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties, respectively. The potential uses of mTOR inhibitors are heavily explored because of their impact on cell growth and proliferation. However, mTOR inhibitors have a broad range of effects that can result in adverse reactions, but side effects can occur with other immunosuppressive agents as well. Thus, the performance of mTOR inhibitors is compared to the outcomes and adverse effects of other immunosuppressive drugs or the combination of other immunosuppressants and mTOR inhibitors. Because mTOR regulates many downstream pathways, mTOR inhibitors can affect these pathways to manage various diseases. Sirolimus (rapamycin) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat post-renal transplantation and lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). Everolimus is approved by the FDA to treat postmenopausal advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in women, progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin (PNET), advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), renal angiomyolipoma (AML) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) associated with TSC as well as renal and liver transplantation. Temsirolimus is approved by the FDA to treat advanced RCC. Opportunities to use mTOR inhibitors as therapy for other transplantation, metabolic disease, and cancer management are being researched. mTOR inhibitors are often called proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) because of their effects on proliferation pathways.

Predictive Factors for Humoral Response After 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Patients

Background

A weak immunogenicity has been reported in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients after 2 doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the predictive factors for humoral response in SOT patients.

Methods

Three hundred and ninety-three SOT patients from our center with at least 4 wk of follow-up after 2 doses of mRNA-based vaccine were included in this study. Anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike protein antibodies were assessed before and after vaccination.

Results

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 34% of the patients: 33.7% of kidney transplant patients, 47.7% of liver transplant patients, and 14.3% of thoracic transplant patients (P = 0.005). Independent predictive factors for humoral response after vaccination were male gender, a longer period between transplantation and vaccination, liver transplant recipients, a higher lymphocyte count at baseline, a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and receiving the tacrolimus + everolimus ± steroids combination. Conversely, the nondevelopment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination was associated with younger patients, thoracic organ recipients, induction therapy recipients, and tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid ± steroids recipients.

Conclusions

The immunosuppressive regimen is a modifiable predictive factor for humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Everolimus-Induced Immune Effects after Heart Transplantation: A Possible Tool for Clinicians to Monitor Patients at Risk for Transplant Rejection

Background: Patients treated with an inhibitor of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTORI) in a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppressive regimen after heart transplantation (HTx) show a higher risk for transplant rejection. We developed an immunological monitoring tool that may improve the identification of mTORI-treated patients at risk for rejection. Methods: Circulating dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory T cells (T_regs) were analysed in 19 mTORI- and 20 CNI-treated HTx patients by flow cytometry. Principal component and cluster analysis were used to identify patients at risk for transplant rejection. Results: The percentages of total T_regs (p = 0.02) and CD39⁺ T_regs (p = 0.05) were higher in mTORI-treated patients than in CNI-treated patients. The principal component analysis revealed that BDCA1⁺, BDCA2⁺ and BDCA4⁺ DCs as well as total T_regs could distinguish between non-rejecting and rejecting mTORI-treated patients. Most mTORI-treated rejectors showed higher levels of BDCA2⁺ and BDCA4⁺ plasmacytoid DCs and lower levels of BDCA1⁺ myeloid DCs and T_regs than mTORI non-rejectors. Conclusion: An mTORI-based immunosuppressive regimen induced a sufficient, tolerance-promoting reaction in T_regs, but an insufficient, adverse effect in DCs. On the basis of patient-specific immunological profiles, we established a flow cytometry-based monitoring tool that may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for rejection.

Long-term experience using CNI-free immunosuppression in selected paediatric heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

CNI-free immunosuppression with conversion to mTORi-based immunosuppression has been demonstrated to reduce CNI-toxicity and to exhibit anti-proliferative properties. However, the experience of CNI-free immunosuppression in paediatric heart transplantation is limited.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 129 paediatric heart transplants performed between 1997 and 2015. Fifteen patients with clinically indicated conversion from CNI-based to CNI-free immunosuppression were identified. Survival data, rejection episodes, renal function, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder and CAV, including examination with OCT were analysed.

RESULTS

Immunosuppression conversion was successful in all patients. Fourteen of 15 patients (93%) are currently living with good graft function. Median post-transplant survival was 15 years (range, 5-23 years), and median follow-up since conversion was 6 years (range, 1-11 years). Mild (grade 1R) ACR was present in three patients after discontinuation of CNIs. The recovery of renal function with a significant increase in eGFR was observed at 1 and 3 years after conversion. No patient had angiographic signs of macroscopic CAV according to the current ISHLT classification; however, OCT showed the signs of angiographically silent CAV in all patients. CAV did not progress in any patient, implying CAV was stabilised by mTORi-based CNI-free immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

CNI-free immunosuppression based on mTORis is a safe and appropriate strategy for maintenance therapy in selected paediatric patients, significantly improves renal function and stabilises CAV. OCT revealed early development of angiographically silent CAV.

Steroid withdrawal after heart transplantation in adults

Corticosteroids (CSs) are a key component of immunosuppressive treatment after heart transplantation (HTx). While effectively preventing acute rejection, several adverse effects including diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, and hyperlipidemia are associated with long-term use. As these complications may impair long-term outcome in HTx recipients, withdrawal of CSs is highly desirable, however, no uniform approach exists. Previous experience suggests that CS withdrawal can be accomplished without an increase in the incidence of acute rejection and even carrying a survival benefit. Also, common complications related to long-term CS use appear to be less frequent following CS discontinuation. Recipients who successfully discontinue CSs, however, likely belong to an immune-privileged subset of patients with low risk of post-transplant complications. Available studies evaluating CS withdrawal are highly heterogeneous and consensus on optimal timing and eligibility for withdrawal is lacking. Efforts to improve the understanding of optimal CS withdrawal strategy are of great importance in order to safely promote CS weaning in eligible patients and thereby alleviate the adverse effects of long-term CS use on post-transplant outcomes. The purpose of this review was to evaluate different protocols of CS withdrawal after HTx in terms of clinical outcomes and to explore criteria for successful CS withdrawal.

An overview of the efficacy and safety of everolimus in adult solid organ transplant recipients

As the risk of graft loss due to acute rejection has declined, the goal of post-transplant management has switched to long-term preservation of organ function. Minimizing calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity is a key component of this objective. Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor/proliferation-signal inhibitor with potent immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative effects. It has been widely investigated in large randomized clinical studies that have shown it to have similar anti-rejection efficacy compared with standard-of-care regimens across organ transplant indications. With demonstrated potential to facilitate the reduction of CNI therapy and preserve renal function, everolimus is an alternative to the current standard-of-care CNI-based regimens used in de novo and maintenance solid organ transplantation recipients. Here, we provide an overview of the evidence from the everolimus clinical study program across kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants, as well as other key data associated with its use in CNI reduction strategies in adult transplant recipients.

Effects of mTOR inhibitor-related proteinuria on progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and outcomes among heart transplant recipients

We have previously described the use of sirolimus (SRL) as primary immunosuppression following heart transplantation (HT). The advantages of this approach include attenuation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and reduced malignancy. However, in some patients SRL may cause significant proteinuria. We sought to investigate the prognostic value of proteinuria after conversion to SRL. CAV progression and adverse clinical events were studied. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the Δ change in plaque volume (PV) and plaque index (PI) per year using coronary intravascular ultrasound. Proteinuria was defined as Δ urine protein ≥300 mg/24 h at 1 year after conversion to SRL. Overall, 137 patients were analyzed (26% with proteinuria). Patients with proteinuria had significantly lower GFR (P = .005) but similar GFR during follow-up. Delta PV (P < .001) and Δ PI (P = .001) were significantly higher among patients with proteinuria after adjustment for baseline characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.8; P = .01) with proteinuria but similar risk of CAV-related events (P = .61). Our results indicate that proteinuria is a marker of baseline renal dysfunction, and that HT recipients who develop proteinuria after conversion to SRL have less attenuation of CAV progression and higher mortality risk.

Quadritherapy vs standard tritherapy immunosuppressant regimen after heart transplantation: A propensity score-matched cohort analysis

After heart transplant, adding everolimus (EVL) to standard immunosuppressive regimen mostly relies on converting calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) into EVL. The aim of this study was to describe the effects of combining low-dose EVL and CNIs in maintenance immunosuppression regimen (quadritherapy) and compare it with standard tritherapy associating standard-dose CNIs, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. In the 3-year registry cohort of heart transplanted patients, those who received quadritherapy were compared with those who received tritherapy. EVL was added after 3 months posttransplant. Three analyses were performed to control for confounders: propensity score matching, multivariable survival, and inverse probability score weighting analyses. Among 213 patients who were included (75 with quadritherapy), propensity score matching selected 64 unique pairs of patients with similar characteristics. In the matched cohort (n = 128), quadritherapy was associated with fewer deaths (3 [4.7%] vs 17 [21.9%], P = .007) and biopsy-proven acute rejections (15 [23.4%] vs 31 [48.4%], P = .002). These results were confirmed in the overall cohort (n = 213), after multivariable and inverse probability score weighting analyses. Renal function and donor-specific HLA-antibodies remained similar in both groups. Low-dose combination quadritherapy was associated with fewer deaths and rejections, compared with standard immunosuppression tritherapy.

Effect of Therapeutic Modification on Outcomes in Heart Transplantation Over the Past Two Decades - A Single-Center Experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

During these 2 decades (1999-2019), many therapeutic strategies have been developed in the field of heart transplant (HTx) to improve post-HTx outcomes. In the present study, 116 consecutive HTx adults between 1999 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the influences of a therapeutic modification on post HTx outcomes.Methods and Results:Patient survival, functional status and hemodynamics after HTx and modification of therapeutic strategies were reviewed. The overall cumulative survival rate at 10 and 20 years post-HTx was 96.4 and 76.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival rate or exercise tolerance after HTx between extracorporeal and implantable continuous flow-LVAD. Post-HTx patient survival in patients, irrespective of the donor risk factors such as donor age, low LVEF, history of cardiac arrest, was equivalent across cohorts, while longer TIT and higher inotrope dosage prior to procurement surgery were significant risk factors for survival. In 21 patients given everolimus (EVL) due to renal dysfunction, serum creatinine significantly decreased 1 year after initiation. In 22 patients given EVL due to transplant coronary vasculopathy (TCAV), maximum intimal thickness significantly decreased 3 years after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of a 20-year single-center experience with HTx in Japan shows encouraging improved results when several therapeutic modifications were made; for example, proactive use of donor hearts declined by other centers and the use of EVL in patients with renal dysfunction and TCAV.