1
|
Kotton CN, Kamar N, Wojciechowski D, Eder M, Hopfer H, Randhawa P, Sester M, Comoli P, Tedesco Silva H, Knoll G, Brennan DC, Trofe-Clark J, Pape L, Axelrod D, Kiberd B, Wong G, Hirsch HH. The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00727. [PMID: 38605438 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille N Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Unit, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael Eder
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Hopfer
- Division of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Division of Transplantation Pathology, The Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Martina Sester
- Department of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Patrizia Comoli
- Cell Factory and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Unit, Department of Mother and Child Health, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Helio Tedesco Silva
- Division of Nephrology, Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Greg Knoll
- Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Trofe-Clark
- Renal-Electrolyte Hypertension Division, Associated Faculty of the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA
- Transplantation Division, Associated Faculty of the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA
| | - Lars Pape
- Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Axelrod
- Kidney, Pancreas, and Living Donor Transplant Programs at University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Bryce Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hans H Hirsch
- Division of Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kusejko K, Neofytos D, van Delden C, Hirsch HH, Meylan P, Boggian K, Hirzel C, Garzoni C, Sidler D, Schnyder A, Schaub S, Golshayan D, Haidar F, Bonani M, Kouyos RD, Mueller NJ, Schreiber PW. Do Infectious Diseases After Kidney Retransplantation Differ From Those After First Kidney Transplantation? Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae055. [PMID: 38464489 PMCID: PMC10923290 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Infectious diseases (IDs) are highly relevant after solid organ transplantation in terms of morbidity and mortality, being among the most common causes of death. Patients undergoing kidney retransplantation (re-K-Tx) have been already receiving immunosuppressive therapy over a prolonged period, potentially facilitating subsequent infections. Comparing ID events after re-K-Tx and first kidney transplantation (f-K-Tx) can delineate patterns and risks of ID events associated with prolonged immunosuppression. Methods We included adult patients with records on f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. We analyzed ID events after f-K-Tx and re-K-Tx within the same patients and compared infection rates, causative pathogens, and infection sites. Recurrent time-to-event analyses were performed for comparison of infection rates. Results A total of 59 patients with a median age of 47 years (range, 18-73) were included. Overall, 312 ID events in 52 patients occurred. In multivariable recurrent event modeling, the rate of ID events was significantly lower after re-K-Tx (hazard ratio, 0.70; P = .02). More bacterial (68.9% vs 60.4%) and fungal (4.0% vs 1.1%) infections were observed after f-K-Tx but fewer viral infections (27.0% vs 38.5%) as compared with re-K-Tx (P = .11). After f-K-Tx, urinary and gastrointestinal tract infections were more frequent; after re-K-Tx, respiratory tract and surgical site infections were more frequent (P < .001). Conclusions ID events were less frequent after re-K-Tx. Affected sites differed significantly after f-K-Tx vs re-K-Tx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kusejko
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian van Delden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hans H Hirsch
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinical Virology, Laboratory Medicine/Infectious Diseases, and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Meylan
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Katia Boggian
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Infection Prevention and Travel Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Hirzel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Garzoni
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurelia Schnyder
- Clinic for Nephrology, Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Déla Golshayan
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Haidar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marco Bonani
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger D Kouyos
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas J Mueller
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter W Schreiber
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parajuli S, Aziz F, Zhong W, Djamali A. BK polyomavirus infection: more than 50 years and still a threat to kidney transplant recipients. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2024; 3:1309927. [PMID: 38993764 PMCID: PMC11235301 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1309927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous human polyomavirus and a major infection after kidney transplantation, primarily due to immunosuppression. BKPyV reactivation can manifest as viruria in 30%-40%, viremia in 10%-20%, and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in 1%-10% of recipients. BKPyVAN is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Although the first case of BKPyV was identified in 1971, progress in its management has been limited. Specifically, there is no safe and effective antiviral agent or vaccine to treat or prevent the infection. Even in the current era, the mainstay approach to BKPyV is a reduction in immunosuppression, which is also limited by safety (risk of de novo donor specific antibody and rejection) and efficacy (graft failure). However, recently BKPyV has been getting more attention in the field, and some new treatment strategies including the utilization of viral-specific T-cell therapy are emerging. Given all these challenges, the primary focus of this article is complications associated with BKPyV, as well as strategies to mitigate negative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Weixiong Zhong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, Maine Medical Center Maine Health, Portland, ME, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang H, Wang D, Sun X, Wang H, Lan Y, Wei L. Diagnostic performance of GcfDNA in kidney allograft rejection: a meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2024; 14:1293402. [PMID: 38264334 PMCID: PMC10803602 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1293402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In this comprehensive meta-analysis, our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of graft-derived cell-free DNA (GcfDNA) in kidney allograft rejection and explore associated factors. We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, spanning from their inception to September 2022. Statistical analysis was executed utilizing Stata 15, Meta-DiSc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software. The combined pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve from the synthesis of findings across ten studies were as follows: 0.75 (0.67-0.81), 0.78 (0.72-0.83), 3.36 (2.89-4.35), 0.32 (0.24-0.44), 8.77 (4.34-17.74), and 0.83 (0.80-0.86), respectively. Among the ten studies primarily focused on GcfDNA's diagnostic potential for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), the optimal cut-off threshold demonstrated substantial diagnostic efficacy, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve values of 0.83 (0.74-0.89), 0.75 (0.70-0.80), 3.37 (2.64-4.30), 0.23 (0.15-0.36), 14.65 (7.94-27.03), and 0.85 (0.82-0.88), respectively. These results underscore the high diagnostic accuracy of GcfDNA in detecting rejection. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off threshold proves effective in diagnosing ABMR, while a 1% threshold remains a robust diagnostic criterion for rejection. Notably, for ABMR diagnosis, droplet digital PCR digital droplet polymerase chain reaction emerges as a superior method in terms of accuracy when compared to other techniques. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongji Yang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Duo Wang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Sun
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center and Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hailian Wang
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Lan
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Liang Wei
- Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou X, Zhu C, Li H. BK polyomavirus: latency, reactivation, diseases and tumorigenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1263983. [PMID: 37771695 PMCID: PMC10525381 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1263983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of the first human polyomavirus BK (BKV) has been over half century, The previous epidemiological and phylogenetic studies suggest that BKV prevailed and co-evolved with humans, leading to high seroprevalence all over the world. In general, BKV stays latent and symptomless reactivation in healthy individuals. BKV has been mainly interlinked with BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney-transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTRs). However, the mechanisms underlying BKV latency and reactivation are not fully understood and lack of extensive debate. As Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) was identified as a pathogenic agent of malignant cutaneous cancer Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) since 2008, linking BKV to tumorigenesis of urologic tumors raised concerns in the scientific community. In this review, we mainly focus on advances of mechanisms of BKV latency and reactivation, and BKV-associated diseases or tumorigenesis with systematical review of formerly published papers following the PRISMA guidelines. The potential tumorigenesis of BKV in two major types of cancers, head and neck cancer and urologic cancer, was systematically updated and discussed in depth. Besides, BKV may also play an infectious role contributing to HIV-associated salivary gland disease (HIVSGD) presentation. As more evidence indicates the key role of BKV in potential tumorigenesis, it is important to pay more attention on its etiology and pathogenicity in vitro and in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianfeng Zhou
- Cancer Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
- Jiangxi Engineering Research Center for Translational Cancer Technology, Nanchang, China
- Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Diagnosis and Genomics of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China
| | - Chunlong Zhu
- Clinical Laboratory, Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, China
| | - Hui Li
- Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Diagnosis and Genomics of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elalouf A. Infections after organ transplantation and immune response. Transpl Immunol 2023; 77:101798. [PMID: 36731780 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD4+ helper T-cell subset and CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Elalouf
- Bar-Ilan University, Department of Management, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thongprayoon C, Vaitla P, Jadlowiec CC, Mao SA, Mao MA, Acharya PC, Leeaphorn N, Kaewput W, Pattharanitima P, Tangpanithandee S, Krisanapan P, Nissaisorakarn P, Cooper M, Cheungpasitporn W. Differences between kidney retransplant recipients as identified by machine learning consensus clustering. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14943. [PMID: 36799718 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study aimed to characterize kidney retransplant recipients using an unsupervised machine-learning approach. METHODS We performed consensus cluster analysis based on the recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in 17 443 kidney retransplant recipients in the OPTN/UNOS database from 2010 to 2019. We identified each cluster's key characteristics using the standardized mean difference of >.3. We compared the posttransplant outcomes, including death-censored graft failure and patient death among the assigned clusters RESULTS: Consensus cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters of kidney retransplant recipients. Cluster 1 recipients were predominantly white and were less sensitized. They were most likely to receive a living donor kidney transplant and more likely to be preemptive (30%) or need ≤1 year of dialysis (32%). In contrast, cluster 2 recipients were the most sensitized (median PRA 95%). They were more likely to have been on dialysis >1 year, and receive a nationally allocated, low HLA mismatch, standard KDPI deceased donor kidney. Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be minorities (37% Black; 15% Hispanic). They were moderately sensitized with a median PRA of 87% and were also most likely to have been on dialysis >1 year. They received locally allocated high HLA mismatch kidneys from standard KDPI deceased donors. Thymoglobulin was the most commonly used induction agent for all three clusters. Cluster 1 had the most favorable patient and graft survival, while cluster 3 had the worst patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION The use of an unsupervised machine learning approach characterized kidney retransplant recipients into three clinically distinct clusters with differing posttransplant outcomes. Recipients with moderate allosensitization, such as those represented in cluster 3, are perhaps more disadvantaged in the kidney retransplantation process. Potential opportunities for improvement specific to these re-transplant recipients include working to improve opportunities to improve access to living donor kidney transplantation, living donor paired exchange and identifying strategies for better HLA matching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pradeep Vaitla
- Division of Nephrology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | | | - Shennen A Mao
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael A Mao
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Prakrati C Acharya
- Division of Nephrology, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Renal Transplant Program, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine/Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Supawit Tangpanithandee
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pajaree Krisanapan
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Strategies to Overcome HLA Sensitization and Improve Access to Retransplantation after Kidney Graft Loss. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195753. [PMID: 36233621 PMCID: PMC9572793 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation have a previously failed graft. Retransplantation provides a significant improvement in morbidity, mortality, and quality of life when compared to dialysis. However, HLA sensitization is a major barrier to kidney retransplantation and the majority of the highly sensitized patients are waiting for a subsequent kidney transplant. A multidisciplinary team that includes immunogeneticists, transplant nephrologists and surgeons, and adequate allocation policies is fundamental to increase access to a kidney retransplant. A review of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was performed on the challenges of kidney retransplantation after graft loss, focusing on the HLA barrier and new strategies to overcome sensitization. Conclusion: Technical advances in immunogenetics, new desensitization protocols, and complex allocation programs have emerged in recent years to provide a new hope to kidney recipients with a previously failed graft.
Collapse
|
9
|
Identifying RBBP7 as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker for BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy. J Immunol Res 2022; 2022:6934744. [PMID: 35958876 PMCID: PMC9357817 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6934744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) remains a major infectious complication due to powerful immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients, and its histologic appearance can mimic rejection, leading to diagnostic and treatment dilemmas thus molecular diagnostic methods would be beneficial. We collected gene expression profiles of 169 kidney biopsies taken from BKVN, rejection, and stable functioning allografts, based on single sample gene set enrichment analysis and random forest algorithm, and three hallmark activities associated with DNA damage and proliferation were found to be relatively specific in BKVN. Subsequently, weighted gene co-expression network analysis and support vector machines (SVM) algorithm identified RBBP7 as a robust and promising biomarker with high accuracy in both training and validation cohorts (AUC =0.938, 0.977, respectively). Besides, potential drugs for BKVN treatment such as mepacrine were discovered, which may contribute to targeted antiviral therapy and effective patient management rather than simply reducing the doses of immunosuppressive agents in clinical practice. RBBP7 (retinoblastoma binding protein 7) serves as component of serval complexes that regulate chromatin metabolism and functions in affecting DNA replication and controlling cell proliferation. In this research, upregulation of RBBP7 was found to be associated with the higher infiltration of CD8 naïve T, iTreg, and neutrophil cells and the lower amounts of Th1, central memory T, NKT, CD8 T, and dendritic cells. Moreover, the infiltration of Th1, Th17, and NKT cells was steadily different between BKVN and rejection allografts through immune cell assessment. In conclusion, we identified and verified RBBP7 as a molecular biomarker for BKVN diagnosis, which demonstrated great distinguishing ability with allograft rejection and would support clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
10
|
BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review. Viruses 2022; 14:v14081616. [PMID: 35893681 PMCID: PMC9330039 DOI: 10.3390/v14081616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pinto-Ramirez J, Garcia-Lopez A, Salcedo-Herrera S, Patino-Jaramillo N, Garcia-Lopez J, Barbosa-Salinas J, Riveros-Enriquez S, Hernandez-Herrera G, Giron-Luque F. Risk factors for graft loss and death among kidney transplant recipients: A competing risk analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269990. [PMID: 35834500 PMCID: PMC9282472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutical option for CKD patients. Graft loss risk factors are usually estimated with the cox method. Competing risk analysis could be useful to determine the impact of different events affecting graft survival, the occurrence of an outcome of interest can be precluded by another. We aimed to determine the risk factors for graft loss in the presence of mortality as a competing event. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 1454 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2019, in Colombiana de Trasplantes, were analyzed to determine risk factors of graft loss and mortality at 5 years post-transplantation. Kidney and patient survival probabilities were estimated by the competing risk analysis. The Fine and Gray method was used to fit a multivariable model for each outcome. Three variable selection methods were compared, and the bootstrapping technique was used for internal validation as split method for resample. The performance of the final model was assessed calculating the prediction error, brier score, c-index and calibration plot. RESULTS Graft loss occurred in 169 patients (11.6%) and death in 137 (9.4%). Cumulative incidence for graft loss and death was 15.8% and 13.8% respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that BKV nephropathy, serum creatinine and increased number of renal biopsies were significant risk factors for graft loss. On the other hand, recipient age, acute cellular rejection, CMV disease were risk factors for death, and recipients with living donor had better survival compared to deceased-donor transplant and coronary stent. The c-index were 0.6 and 0.72 for graft loss and death model respectively. CONCLUSION We developed two prediction models for graft loss and death 5 years post-transplantation by a unique transplant program in Colombia. Using a competing risk multivariable analysis, we were able to identify 3 significant risk factors for graft loss and 5 significant risk factors for death. This contributes to have a better understanding of risk factors for graft loss in a Latin-American population. The predictive performance of the models was mild.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Garcia-Lopez
- Department of Transplant Research, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Juan Garcia-Lopez
- Departmento of Technology and Informatics, Colombiana de Trasplantes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Gilma Hernandez-Herrera
- Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Universidad del Rosario – Universidad CES, Bogotá-Medellín, Colombia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Agrawal A, Ison MG, Danziger-Isakov L. Long-Term Infectious Complications of Kidney Transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:286-295. [PMID: 33879502 PMCID: PMC8823942 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.15971020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Infections remain a common complication of solid-organ transplantation. Most infections in the first month after transplant are typically health care-associated infections, whereas late infections, beyond 6-12 months, are community-acquired infections. Opportunistic infections most frequently present in the first 12 months post-transplant and can be modulated on prior exposures and use of prophylaxis. In this review, we summarize the current epidemiology of postkidney transplant infections with a focus on key viral (BK polyomavirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and norovirus), bacterial (urinary tract infections and Clostridioides difficile colitis), and fungal infections. Current guidelines for safe living post-transplant are also summarized. Literature supporting prophylaxis and vaccination is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akansha Agrawal
- Division of Nephrology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Myint TM, Chong CHY, Wyld M, Nankivell B, Kable K, Wong G. Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management. Transplantation 2022; 106:e76-e89. [PMID: 33908382 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thida Maung Myint
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Newcastle Transplant Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Chanel H Y Chong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Wyld
- Department of Renal Medicine, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathy Kable
- Department of Renal Medicine, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nguyen K, Diamond A, Carlo AD, Karhadkar S. Characterization of Kidney Retransplantation Following Graft Failure Due to BK Virus Nephropathy. J Surg Res 2021; 269:110-118. [PMID: 34547587 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunosuppression following kidney transplantation increases risk of BK polyomavirus reactivation, a common cause of graft dysfunction and failure. Subsequent retransplantation is a viable option that has not been extensively studied. This study further characterizes BK Virus Nephropathy (BKVN) and retransplantation in the most expansive population to date, geographically, temporally, and in magnitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS The OPTN/UNOS database was used to identify patients who received kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation between 1987 and 2018 that resulted in BKVN-attributed failure (n = 1587). This population was divided into those who underwent retransplantation (n = 495) and those who did not (n = 1092). RESULTS The retransplanted cohort was younger (45 vs. 53 yr; P<0.0001) and had fewer prior kidney transplants (P<0.003), lower expected post-transplant survival (P<0.001), lower rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (14.1% vs. 22.2%; P=0.0008), a greater proportion of white patients (55.4% vs. 43.2%; P=0.0002), a greater proportion of living donors (35.8% vs. 23.0%; P<0.0001), and longer allograft lifespan (2.95 vs. 2.41 yr; P<0.0001), compared to those not retransplanted. Among retransplants, DGF and high kidney donor profile index (KDPI) were associated with decreased allograft lifespan (P=0.001, P=0.0005, respectively). Steroid induction had no effect on allograft lifespan when compared to steroid-free regimens (P=0.915). Retransplanted allografts lasted longer than previous BKVN-failed grafts (10.44 and 3.70 years, respectively; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Retransplantation following BKVN-associated graft failure has been associated with favorable outcomes. To maximize allograft lifespan in retransplantation, clinicians may consider selection of low KDPI donors, prevention of delayed graft function, and tailored immunosuppressive regimens that minimize steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Nguyen
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Adam Diamond
- Department of Pharmacy, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Antonio Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sunil Karhadkar
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dong R, Shetty A, Tambur AR, Ison MG. Outcomes of repeat kidney transplantation following prior graft failure secondary to BK nephropathy: A single-center retrospective study. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13672. [PMID: 34153164 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK virus is associated with development of nephropathy (BKVN) that can lead to graft failure after renal transplantation. There are limited data on rates of recurrence and outcomes of repeat renal transplantation after prior graft loss caused by BKVN. METHODS After IRB approval, data on all patients who underwent a repeat renal transplantation after prior graft failure as a result of BKVN were identified. Data on management of patients prior to retransplantation, induction and maintenance immunosuppression, and key clinical and virologic outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS Thirteen patients were identified over a 13-year period, and follow-up of these patients occurred for a median of 4.7 years. Most patients have previous renal transplants removed prior to (7/13, 53.8%) or at the time of retransplantation (3/13, 23.1%). Close virologic monitoring of serum and urine, coupled with early immunosuppression minimization, was associated with few patients developing BK viruria above 1 × 107 c/mL (4/13, 30.8%), BK viremia above 10,000 c/mL (2/13, 15.4%), and biopsy-proven BKVN (1/12, 8.3%); most (8/13, 61.5%) developed BK viruria at any level. Renal function at 1 year post-retransplantation was generally excellent and only 1 patient developed graft failure caused by recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. In our review of the literature, 2 large observational studies of the UNOS database as well as our analysis of case reports showed excellent graft survival and very low rates of recurrent BKVN leading to graft loss. CONCLUSIONS Retransplantation after prior graft failure caused by BKVN generally has low rates of recurrence when coupled with close monitoring and early immunosuppression minimization. Removal of failed renal transplant may allow easier monitoring for recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Dong
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aneesha Shetty
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Divisions of Nephrology and Hypertension, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael G Ison
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vaitla PK, Thongprayoon C, Hansrivijit P, Kanduri SR, Kovvuru K, Rivera FHC, Cato LD, Garla V, Watthanasuntorn K, Wijarnpreecha K, Chewcharat A, Aeddula NR, Bathini T, Koller FL, Matemavi P, Cheungpasitporn W. Epidemiology of cannabis use and associated outcomes among kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2021; 14:90-96. [PMID: 32558277 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the United States, and transplant acceptability for cannabis using candidates varies among transplant centers. However, the prevalence and impact of cannabis use on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients remain unclear. This study aimed to summarize the prevalence and impact of cannabis use on outcomes after kidney transplantation. METHODS A literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library Databases from inception until September 2019 to identify studies assessing the prevalence of cannabis use among kidney transplant recipients, and reported adverse outcomes after kidney transplantation. Effect estimates from the individual studies were obtained and combined utilizing random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian-Laird. RESULTS A total of four cohort studies with a total of 55 897 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated prevalence of cannabis use was 3.2% (95% CI 0.4%-20.5%). While the use of cannabis was not significantly associated with all-cause allograft failure (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.70-2.46) or mortality (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 0.59-3.92), the use of cannabis among kidney transplant recipients was significantly associated with increased death-censored graft failure with pooled OR of 1.72 (95% CI 1.13-2.60). CONCLUSIONS The overall estimated prevalence of cannabis use among kidney transplant recipients is 3.2%. The use of cannabis is associated with increased death-censored graft failure, but not mortality after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradeep K Vaitla
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi
| | | | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Swetha R Kanduri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Karthik Kovvuru
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Franco H Cabeza Rivera
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Liam D Cato
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vishnu Garla
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | | | - Karn Wijarnpreecha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Api Chewcharat
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Narothama Reddy Aeddula
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Deaconess Health System, Evansville, Indiana
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Felicitas L Koller
- Department of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Praise Matemavi
- Department of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy after Renal Transplantation. Pathogens 2021; 10:pathogens10020150. [PMID: 33540802 PMCID: PMC7913099 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10020150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy have reduced the incidence of acute rejection and improved renal transplantation outcomes. Meanwhile, nephropathy caused by BK virus has become an important cause of acute or chronic graft dysfunction. The usual progression of infection begins with BK viruria and progresses to BK viremia, leading to BK virus associated nephropathy. To detect early signs of BK virus proliferation before the development of nephropathy, several screening tests are used including urinary cytology and urinary and plasma PCR. A definitive diagnosis of BK virus associated nephropathy can be achieved only histologically, typically by detecting tubulointerstitial inflammation associated with basophilic intranuclear inclusions in tubular and/or Bowman’s epithelial cells, in addition to immunostaining with anti-Simian virus 40 large T-antigen. Several pathological classifications have been proposed to categorize the severity of the disease to allow treatment strategies to be determined and treatment success to be predicted. Since no specific drugs that directly suppress the proliferation of BKV are available, the main therapeutic approach is the reduction of immunosuppressive drugs. The diagnosis of subsequent acute rejection, the definition of remission, the protocol of resuming immunosuppression, and long-term follow-up remain controversial.
Collapse
|
18
|
Burek Kamenaric M, Ivkovic V, Kovacevic Vojtusek I, Zunec R. The Role of HLA and KIR Immunogenetics in BK Virus Infection after Kidney Transplantation. Viruses 2020; 12:v12121417. [PMID: 33317205 PMCID: PMC7763146 DOI: 10.3390/v12121417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus with high seroprevalence in the general population with an unremarkable clinical presentation in healthy people, but a potential for causing serious complications in immunosuppressed transplanted patients. Reactivation or primary infection in kidney allograft recipients may lead to allograft dysfunction and subsequent loss. Currently, there is no widely accepted specific treatment for BKV infection and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay therapy. Given this and the sequential appearance of viruria-viremia-nephropathy, screening and early detection are of utmost importance. There are numerous risk factors associated with BKV infection including genetic factors, among them human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) alleles have been shown to be the strongest so far. Identification of patients at risk for BKV infection would be useful in prevention or early action to reduce morbidity and progression to frank nephropathy. Assessment of risk involving HLA ligands and KIR genotyping of recipients in the pre-transplant or early post-transplant period might be useful in clinical practice. This review summarizes current knowledge of the association between HLA, KIR and BKV infection and potential future directions of research, which might lead to optimal utilization of these genetic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Burek Kamenaric
- Tissue Typing Center, Clinical Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Vanja Ivkovic
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.I.); (I.K.V.)
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ivana Kovacevic Vojtusek
- Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.I.); (I.K.V.)
| | - Renata Zunec
- Tissue Typing Center, Clinical Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wilhelm M, Kaur A, Wernli M, Hirsch HH. BK Polyomavirus-Specific CD8 T-Cell Expansion In Vitro Using 27mer Peptide Antigens for Developing Adoptive T-Cell Transfer and Vaccination. J Infect Dis 2020; 223:1410-1422. [PMID: 32857163 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant cause of premature kidney transplant failure. In the absence of effective antivirals, current treatments rely on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. Increasing BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells correlate with clearance of BKPyV DNAemia in kidney transplant patients. We characterized a novel approach for expanding BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells in vitro using 27mer-long synthetic BKPyV peptides, different types of antigen-presenting cells, and CD4 T cells. METHODS Langerhans cells and immature or mature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy blood donors, pulsed with synthetic peptide pools consisting of 36 overlapping 27mers (27mP) or 180 15mers (15mP). BKPyV-specific CD8 T-cell responses were assessed by cytokine release assays using 15mP or immunodominant 9mers. RESULTS BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells expanded using 27mP and required mature Mo-DCs (P = .0312) and CD4 T cells (P = .0156) for highest responses. The resulting BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells proliferated, secreted multiple cytokines including interferon γ and tumor necrosis factor α, and were functional (CD107a+/PD1-) and cytotoxic. CONCLUSIONS Synthetic 27mP permit expanding BKPyV-specific CD8 T-cell responses when pulsing mature Mo-DCs in presence of CD4 T cells, suggesting novel and safe approaches to vaccination and adoptive T-cell therapies for patients before and after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud Wilhelm
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amandeep Kaur
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marion Wernli
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans H Hirsch
- Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Clinical Virology, Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Thongprayoon C, Neyra JA, Hansrivijit P, Medaura J, Leeaphorn N, Davis PW, Kaewput W, Bathini T, Salim SA, Chewcharat A, Aeddula NR, Vallabhajosyula S, Mao MA, Cheungpasitporn W. Serum Klotho in Living Kidney Donors and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061834. [PMID: 32545510 PMCID: PMC7355868 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
α-Klotho is a known anti-aging protein that exerts diverse physiological effects, including phosphate homeostasis. Klotho expression occurs predominantly in the kidney and is significantly decreased in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, changes in serum klotho levels and impacts of klotho on outcomes among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and kidney donors remain unclear. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database from inception through October 2019 to identify studies evaluating serum klotho levels and impacts of klotho on outcomes among KTx recipients and kidney donors. Study results were pooled and analyzed utilizing a random-effects model. Ten cohort studies with a total of 431 KTx recipients and 5 cohort studies with a total of 108 living kidney donors and were identified. After KTx, recipients had a significant increase in serum klotho levels (at 4 to 13 months post-KTx) with a mean difference (MD) of 243.11 pg/mL (three studies; 95% CI 67.41 to 418.81 pg/mL). Although KTx recipients had a lower serum klotho level with a MD of = -234.50 pg/mL (five studies; 95% CI -444.84 to -24.16 pg/mL) compared to healthy unmatched volunteers, one study demonstrated comparable klotho levels between KTx recipients and eGFR-matched controls. Among kidney donors, there was a significant decrease in serum klotho levels post-nephrectomy (day 3 to day 5) with a mean difference (MD) of -232.24 pg/mL (three studies; 95% CI -299.41 to -165.07 pg/mL). At one year following kidney donation, serum klotho levels remained lower than baseline before nephrectomy with a MD of = -110.80 pg/mL (two studies; 95% CI 166.35 to 55.24 pg/mL). Compared to healthy volunteers, living kidney donors had lower serum klotho levels with a MD of = -92.41 pg/mL (two studies; 95% CI -180.53 to -4.29 pg/mL). There is a significant reduction in serum klotho levels after living kidney donation and an increase in serum klotho levels after KTx. Future prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of changes in klotho on clinical outcomes in KTx recipients and living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
- Correspondence: (C.T.); (W.C.)
| | - Javier A. Neyra
- Division of Nephrology, Bone and Mineral Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;
- Charles and Jane Pak Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17105, USA;
| | - Juan Medaura
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (J.M.); (P.W.D.); (S.A.S.)
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Renal Transplant Program, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine/Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA;
| | - Paul W. Davis
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (J.M.); (P.W.D.); (S.A.S.)
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA;
| | - Sohail Abdul Salim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (J.M.); (P.W.D.); (S.A.S.)
| | - Api Chewcharat
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Narothama Reddy Aeddula
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Deaconess Health System, Evansville, IN 47710, USA;
| | | | - Michael A. Mao
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (J.M.); (P.W.D.); (S.A.S.)
- Correspondence: (C.T.); (W.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Thongprayoon C, Vaitla P, Craici IM, Leeaphorn N, Hansrivijit P, Salim SA, Bathini T, Cabeza Rivera FH, Cheungpasitporn W. The Use of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA for Assessment of Allograft Rejection and Injury Status. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E1480. [PMID: 32423115 PMCID: PMC7290747 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient monitoring after kidney transplantation (KT) for early detection of allograft rejection remains key in preventing allograft loss. Serum creatinine has poor predictive value to detect ongoing active rejection as its increase is not sensitive, nor specific for acute renal allograft rejection. Diagnosis of acute rejection requires allograft biopsy and histological assessment, which can be logistically challenging in some cases and carries inherent risk for complications related to procedure. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), DNA of donor origin in the blood of KT recipient arising from cells undergoing injury and death, has been examined as a potential surrogate marker for allograft rejection. A rise in dd-cfDNA levels precedes changes in serum creatinine allows early detections and use as a screening tool for allograft rejection. In addition, when used in conjunction with donor-specific antibodies (DSA), it increases the pre-biopsy probability of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) aiding the decision-making process. Advancements in noninvasive biomarker assays such as dd-cfDNA may offer the opportunity to improve and expand the spectrum of available diagnostic tools to monitor and detect risk for rejection and positively impact outcomes for KT recipients. In this this article, we discussed the evolution of dd-cfDNA assays and recent evidence of assessment of allograft rejection and injury status of KT by the use of dd-cfDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (C.T.); (I.M.C.)
| | - Pradeep Vaitla
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (P.V.); (S.A.S.); (F.H.C.R.)
| | - Iasmina M. Craici
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (C.T.); (I.M.C.)
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Renal Transplant Program, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine/Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA;
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17105, USA;
| | - Sohail Abdul Salim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (P.V.); (S.A.S.); (F.H.C.R.)
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
| | - Franco H. Cabeza Rivera
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (P.V.); (S.A.S.); (F.H.C.R.)
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (P.V.); (S.A.S.); (F.H.C.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Degree of Glomerulosclerosis in Procurement Kidney Biopsies from Marginal Donor Kidneys and Their Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051469. [PMID: 32422905 PMCID: PMC7291279 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the association between the percentage of glomerulosclerosis (GS) in procurement allograft biopsies from high-risk deceased donor and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: The UNOS database was used to identify deceased-donor kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) score > 85% from 2005 to 2014. Deceased donor kidneys were categorized based on the percentage of GS: 0-10%, 11-20%, >20% and no biopsy performed. The outcome included death-censored graft survival, patient survival, rate of delayed graft function, and 1-year acute rejection. Results: Of 22,006 kidneys, 91.2% were biopsied showing 0-10% GS (58.0%), 11-20% GS (13.5%), >20% GS (19.7%); 8.8% were not biopsied. The rate of kidney discard was 48.5%; 33.6% in 0-10% GS, 68.9% in 11-20% GS, and 77.4% in >20% GS. 49.8% of kidneys were discarded in those that were not biopsied. Death-censored graft survival at 5 years was 75.8% for 0-10% GS, 70.9% for >10% GS, and 74.8% for the no biopsy group. Among kidneys with >10% GS, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival between 11-20% GS and >20% GS. Recipients with >10% GS had an increased risk of graft failure (HR = 1.27, p < 0.001), compared with 0-10% GS. There was no significant difference in patient survival, acute rejection at 1-year, and delayed graft function between 0% and 10% GS and >10% GS. Conclusion: In >85% KDPI kidneys, our study suggested that discard rates increased with higher percentages of GS, and GS >10% is an independent prognostic factor for graft failure. Due to organ shortage, future studies are needed to identify strategies to use these marginal kidneys safely and improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
23
|
Thongprayoon C, Hansrivijit P, Leeaphorn N, Acharya P, Torres-Ortiz A, Kaewput W, Kovvuru K, Kanduri SR, Bathini T, Cheungpasitporn W. Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041193. [PMID: 32331309 PMCID: PMC7230851 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in surgical, immunosuppressive and monitoring protocols have led to the significant improvement of overall one-year kidney allograft outcomes. Nonetheless, there has not been a significant change in long-term kidney allograft outcomes. In fact, chronic and acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation, including multiple incidences of primary kidney disease, as well as complications such as cardiovascular diseases, infections, and malignancy are the major factors that have contributed to the failure of kidney allografts. The use of molecular techniques to enhance histological diagnostics and noninvasive surveillance are what the latest studies in the field of clinical kidney transplant seem to mainly focus upon. Increasingly innovative approaches are being used to discover immunosuppressive methods to overcome critical sensitization, prevent the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, treat chronic active ABMR, and reduce non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation, such as the recurrence of primary kidney disease and other complications, such as cardiovascular diseases, infections, and malignancy. In the present era of utilizing electronic health records (EHRs), it is strongly believed that big data and artificial intelligence will reshape the research done on kidney transplantation in the near future. In addition, the utilization of telemedicine is increasing, providing benefits such as reaching out to kidney transplant patients in remote areas and helping to make scarce healthcare resources more accessible for kidney transplantation. In this article, we discuss the recent research developments in kidney transplants that may affect long-term allografts, as well as the survival of the patient. The latest developments in living kidney donation are also explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17105, USA;
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Department of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA;
| | - Prakrati Acharya
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX 79905, USA;
| | - Aldo Torres-Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA;
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Karthik Kovvuru
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
| | - Swetha R. Kanduri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-601-984-5670; Fax: +1-601-984-5765
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thongprayoon C, Kaewput W, Kovvuru K, Hansrivijit P, Kanduri SR, Bathini T, Chewcharat A, Leeaphorn N, Gonzalez-Suarez ML, Cheungpasitporn W. Promises of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology and Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041107. [PMID: 32294906 PMCID: PMC7230205 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney diseases form part of the major health burdens experienced all over the world. Kidney diseases are linked to high economic burden, deaths, and morbidity rates. The great importance of collecting a large quantity of health-related data among human cohorts, what scholars refer to as “big data”, has increasingly been identified, with the establishment of a large group of cohorts and the usage of electronic health records (EHRs) in nephrology and transplantation. These data are valuable, and can potentially be utilized by researchers to advance knowledge in the field. Furthermore, progress in big data is stimulating the flourishing of artificial intelligence (AI), which is an excellent tool for handling, and subsequently processing, a great amount of data and may be applied to highlight more information on the effectiveness of medicine in kidney-related complications for the purpose of more precise phenotype and outcome prediction. In this article, we discuss the advances and challenges in big data, the use of EHRs and AI, with great emphasis on the usage of nephrology and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charat Thongprayoon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (C.T.); (A.C.)
| | - Wisit Kaewput
- Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand;
| | - Karthik Kovvuru
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.); (M.L.G.-S.)
| | - Panupong Hansrivijit
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA 17105, USA;
| | - Swetha R. Kanduri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.); (M.L.G.-S.)
| | - Tarun Bathini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA;
| | - Api Chewcharat
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (C.T.); (A.C.)
| | - Napat Leeaphorn
- Department of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Saint Luke’s Health System, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA;
| | - Maria L. Gonzalez-Suarez
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.); (M.L.G.-S.)
| | - Wisit Cheungpasitporn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; (K.K.); (S.R.K.); (M.L.G.-S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-601-984-5670; Fax: +1-601-984-5765
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Díez-Sanmartín C, Sarasa Cabezuelo A. Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Survival in Kidney Transplantation: A Review. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9020572. [PMID: 32093027 PMCID: PMC7074285 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A key issue in the field of kidney transplants is the analysis of transplant recipients' survival. By means of the information obtained from transplant patients, it is possible to analyse in which cases a transplant has a higher likelihood of success and the factors on which it will depend. In general, these analyses have been conducted by applying traditional statistical techniques, as the amount and variety of data available about kidney transplant processes were limited. However, two main changes have taken place in this field in the last decade. Firstly, the digitalisation of medical information through the use of electronic health records (EHRs), which store patients' medical histories electronically. This facilitates automatic information processing through specialised software. Secondly, medical Big Data has provided access to vast amounts of data on medical processes. The information currently available on kidney transplants is huge and varied by comparison to that initially available for this kind of study. This new context has led to the use of other non-traditional techniques more suitable to conduct survival analyses in these new conditions. Specifically, this paper provides a review of the main machine learning methods and tools that are being used to conduct kidney transplant patient and graft survival analyses.
Collapse
|