Idiopathic nonhistaminergic angioedema: A single-center real-life experience from Italy

Patient-rated angioedema severity using a novel photo-aid for predicting non-mast cell mediator-induced angioedema diagnosis

Background

Patients with non-mast cell mediator-induced angioedema (NM-AE) usually experience a diagnostic delay. Therefore, a clinical tool for predicting NM-AE diagnosis is essential.

Objective

To identify clinical predictors related to a confirmed diagnosis of NM-AE.

Methods

Participants with a history of recurrent AE with unknown causes were enrolled. They were classified into mast cell mediator-induced AE (M-AE) and NM-AE according to the response to anti-mast cell mediator therapy. All participants were asked to rate their worst AE ever experienced (% Photomax) from 0 to 100% using a novel photo aid. Clinical characteristics were recorded and analyzed by univariable and multivariable analysis.

Results

Thirty-five participants were included, 25 with NM-AE and 10 with M-AE. AE located at extremities, face, and genitalia and positive family history were significantly associated with NM-AE. The AE severity in the NM-AE group was significantly higher than in the M-AE group, with the mean % Photomax of 82.4 ± 20.3 vs 47.5 ± 25.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. Univariable analysis showed that the % Photomax (every 10% increase), feet AE and hands AE were predictive of being NM-AE with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.75, 0.99), 0.85 (95% CI 0.72, 0.98), and 0.84 (0.69, 0.99), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the combination of hands AE and % Photomax enhanced diagnostic accuracy (AuROC 0.94, 95% CI 0.86, 1.0) and constituted the prototype formula for calculating the diagnostic probability.

Conclusion

Patient-rated angioedema severity using a novel photo aid combined with hands AE had a high probability of diagnosing NM-AE.

Urticaria and Angioedema: Understanding Complex Pathomechanisms to Facilitate Patient Communication, Disease Management, and Future Treatment

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is primarily a T2-dominant disease with a complex genetic background. Skin mast cell activation can be induced not only via the IgE-FcεRI axis but also from several other distinct mechanisms, molecules, and receptors involved in CSU onset, persistence, and exacerbation. These include autoallergy, autoimmunity, central or peripheral neuroimmune dysregulation, activation of both extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation pathways, and microbial infections. Besides mast cells, recent reports suggest the active and direct involvement of basophils and eosinophils. Several biological characteristics or biomarkers have been linked with CSU's known endotypes and may help forecast therapeutic responses. The introduction of biologic therapy for CSU has been a major advance in the last 10 years. The cornerstone of angioedema (AE) pathogenesis is increased vascular permeability and plasma leakage into the deeper dermis and subcutis, either mediated by histamine or bradykinin (BK). C1-inhibitor deficiency, hereditary or acquired, is the primary cause of BK-mediated AE due to increased plasma BK concentration. Other complex conditions have been identified, with some likely involving contact system dysregulation and other putative mechanisms related to vascular endothelial dysfunction. The approval of multiple hereditary-AE-specific therapies for both prevention and acute attacks has revolutionized treatment of this disease. Any new knowledge of the pathogenesis of CSU and AE offers the opportunity to improve patient information, physician-patient communication, prediction of therapeutic responses, selection of precise tailor-made treatment for each patient, and exploration of novel treatment options for those who do not achieve disease control with current medications.

Angioedema Without Wheals: Challenges in Laboratorial Diagnosis

Angioedema is a prevailing symptom in different diseases, frequently occurring in the presence of urticaria. Recurrent angioedema without urticaria (AE) can be hereditary (HAE) and acquired (AAE), and several subtypes can be distinguished, although clinical presentation is quite similar in some of them. They present with subcutaneous and mucosal swellings, affecting extremities, face, genitals, bowels, and upper airways. AE is commonly misdiagnosed due to restricted access and availability of appropriate laboratorial tests. HAE with C1 inhibitor defect is associated with quantitative and/or functional deficiency. Although bradykinin-mediated disease results mainly from disturbance in the kallikrein–kinin system, traditionally complement evaluation has been used for diagnosis. Diagnosis is established by nephelometry, turbidimetry, or radial immunodiffusion for quantitative measurement of C1 inhibitor, and chromogenic assay or ELISA has been used for functional C1-INH analysis. Wrong handling of the samples can lead to misdiagnosis and, consequently, mistaken inappropriate approaches. Dried blood spot (DBS) tests have been used for decades in newborn screening for certain metabolic diseases, and there has been growing interest in their use for other congenital conditions. Recently, DBS is now proposed as an efficient tool to diagnose HAE with C1 inhibitor deficiency, and its use would improve the access to outbound areas and family members. Regarding HAE with normal C1 inhibitor, complement assays’ results are normal and the genetic sequencing of target genes, such as exon 9 of F12 and PLG, is the only available method. New methods to measure cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen and activated plasma kallikrein have emerged as potential biochemical tests to identify bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Validated biomarkers of kallikrein–kinin system activation could be helpful in differentiating mechanisms of angioedema. Our aim is to focus on the capability to differentiate histaminergic AE from bradykinin-mediated AE. In addition, we will describe the challenges developing specific tests like direct bradykinin measurements. The need for quality tests to improve the diagnosis is well represented by the variability of results in functional assays.

The Panorama of Primary Angioedema in the Brazilian Population

BACKGROUND

Primary angioedema (PA) is a complex disorder, presenting multiple hereditary (hereditary angioedema) and acquired subtypes (acquired angioedema). Despite a very similar clinical presentation among subtypes, the differential diagnosis is limited by the difficulty to identify bradykinin-mediated PA and the lack of specific biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES

To report the clinical and genetic features of Brazilian patients with PA.

METHODS

Brazilian patients referred from 50 centers were diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms, C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) and C4 plasma measurements, and DNA sequencing of genes associated with hereditary angioedema.

RESULTS

We characterized 92 patients with acquired angioedema and 425 with HAE: 125 with C1-INH deficiency, 180 with F12 mutations, and 120 of unknown cause. Thirty-one different mutations were identified in SERPING1 and 2 in F12, in addition to 2 mutations of uncertain significance in the ANGPT1 gene. The molecular diagnosis was decisive for 34 patients with HAE without family history, and for 39% of patients with inconsistent biochemical measurements. The median delay in diagnosis was 10 years, with a maximum of 18 years for HAE with C1-INH deficiency. Androgens and tranexamic acid were the most used drugs for long-term prophylaxis in all the PA subtypes, and they were used on demand by 15% of patients. Only 10% of patients reported the use of specific medication for HAE during attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis exposes a broad picture of PA diagnosis and management in a developing country. Complement measurements presented considerable inconsistencies, increasing the diagnosis delay, while patients with PA with normal C1-INH remain with an inaccurate diagnosis and unspecific treatment.