1
|
Perkins GB, Tunbridge MJ, Hurtado PR, Zuiani J, Mhatre S, Yip KH, Le TTA, Yuson C, Kette F, Hissaria P. PEGylated liposomes for diagnosis of polyethylene glycol allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024:S0091-6749(24)00456-1. [PMID: 38718949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a nonprotein polymer that is present in its native (unbound) form as an excipient in a range of products. It is increasingly being utilized clinically in the form of PEGylated liposomal medications and vaccines. PEG is the cause of anaphylaxis in a small percentage of drug reactions; however, diagnosis of PEG allergy is complicated by the variable and poor diagnostic performance of current skin testing protocols. OBJECTIVE We assessed the diagnostic performance of PEGylated lipid medications as an alternative to currently described tests that use medications containing PEG excipients. METHODS Nine patients with a strong history of PEG allergy were evaluated by skin testing with a panel of PEG-containing medications and with a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle vaccine (BNT162b2). Reactivity of basophils to unbound and liposomal PEG was assessed ex vivo, and specificity of basophil responses to PEGylated liposomes was investigated with a competitive inhibition assay. More detailed information is provided in this article's Methods section in the Online Repository available at www.jacionline.org. RESULTS Despite compelling histories of anaphylaxis to PEG-containing medications, only 2 (22%) of 9 patients were skin test positive for purified PEG or their index reaction-indicated PEG-containing compound. Conversely, all 9 patients were skin test positive or basophil activation test positive to PEGylated liposomal BNT162b2 vaccine. Concordantly, PEGylated liposomal drugs (BNT162b2 vaccine and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin), but not purified PEG2000, consistently induced basophil activation ex vivo in patients with PEG allergy but not in nonallergic controls. Basophil reactivity to PEGylated nanoparticles competitively inhibited by preincubation of basophils with native PEG2000. CONCLUSION Presentation of PEG on the surface of a lipid nanoparticle increases its in vivo and ex vivo allergenicity, and improves diagnosis of PEG allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Griffith B Perkins
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia; Immunology Directorate, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Matthew J Tunbridge
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Plinio R Hurtado
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - James Zuiani
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shweta Mhatre
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Immunology Directorate, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kwok Ho Yip
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Carlo Yuson
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Frank Kette
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Pravin Hissaria
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Immunology Directorate, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ieven T, Coorevits L, Vandebotermet M, Tuyls S, Vanneste H, Santy L, Wets D, Proost P, Frans G, Devolder D, Breynaert C, Bullens DMA, Schrijvers R. Endotyping of IgE-Mediated Polyethylene Glycol and/or Polysorbate 80 Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3146-3160. [PMID: 37380070 PMCID: PMC10291891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate 80 (PS80) allergy preclude from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The mechanism(s) governing cross-reactivity and PEG molecular weight dependence remain unclear. OBJECTIVES To evaluate PEGylated lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccine (BNT162b2) tolerance and explore the mechanism of reactivity in PEG and/or PS80 allergic patients. METHODS PEG/PS80 dual- (n = 3), PEG mono- (n = 7), and PS80 mono-allergic patients (n = 2) were included. Tolerability of graded vaccine challenges was assessed. Basophil activation testing on whole blood (wb-BAT) or passively sensitized donor basophils (allo-BAT) was performed using PEG, PS80, BNT162b2, and PEGylated lipids (ALC-0159). Serum PEG-specific IgE was measured in patients (n = 10) and controls (n = 15). RESULTS Graded BNT162b2 challenge in dual- and PEG mono-allergic patients (n = 3/group) was well tolerated and induced anti-spike IgG seroconversion. PS80 mono-allergic patients (n = 2/2) tolerated single-dose BNT162b2 vaccination. Wb-BAT reactivity to PEG-containing antigens was observed in dual- (n = 3/3) and PEG mono- (n = 2/3), but absent in PS80 mono-allergic patients (n = 0/2). BNT162b2 elicited the highest in vitro reactivity. BNT162b2 reactivity was IgE mediated, complement independent, and inhibited in allo-BAT by preincubation with short PEG motifs, or detergent-induced LNP degradation. PEG-specific IgE was only detectable in dual-allergic (n = 3/3) and PEG mono-allergic (n = 1/6) serum. CONCLUSION PEG and PS80 cross-reactivity is determined by IgE recognizing short PEG motifs, whereas PS80 mono-allergy is PEG-independent. PS80 skin test positivity in PEG allergics was associated with a severe and persistent phenotype, higher serum PEG-specific IgE levels, and enhanced BAT reactivity. Spherical PEG exposure via LNP enhances BAT sensitivity through increased avidity. All PEG and/or PS80 excipient allergic patients can safely receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toon Ieven
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieve Coorevits
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martijn Vandebotermet
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pulmonology, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Tuyls
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pulmonology, GZA St-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Hélène Vanneste
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pulmonology, AZ Vesalius, Tongeren, Belgium
| | - Lisa Santy
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonology, St-Jozefskliniek, Izegem, Belgium
| | - Dries Wets
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul Proost
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Glynis Frans
- Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Devolder
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christine Breynaert
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominique M A Bullens
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Schrijvers
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of General Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernandez‐Santamaria R, Bogas G, Montañez MI, Ariza A, Salas M, Cespedes JA, Labella M, Paris JL, Perez‐Sanchez N, Perez‐Inestrosa E, Vida Y, Fernandez TD, Mayorga C, Torres MJ. Synthetic antigenic determinants of clavulanic acid induce dendritic cell maturation and specific T cell proliferation in patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Allergy 2022; 77:3070-3083. [PMID: 35611454 PMCID: PMC9796838 DOI: 10.1111/all.15383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) to clavulanic acid (CLV) have increased in the last decades due to a higher consumption alongside amoxicillin (AX). Due to its chemical instability, diagnostic procedures to evaluate IDHRs to CLV are difficult, and current in vitro assays do not have an optimal sensitivity. The inclusion of the specific metabolites after CLV degradation, which are efficiently recognised by the immune system, could help to improve sensitivity of in vitro tests. METHODS Recognition by dendritic cells (DCs) of CLV and the synthetic analogues of two of its hypothesised antigenic determinants (ADs) was evaluated by flow cytometry in 27 allergic patients (AP) and healthy controls (HC). Their ability to trigger the proliferation of T cells was also analysed by flow cytometry. RESULTS The inclusion of synthetic analogues of CLV ADs, significantly increased the expression of maturation markers on DCs from AP compared to HC. A different recognition pattern could be observed with each AD, and, therefore, the inclusion of both ADs achieves an improved sensitivity. The addition of synthetic ADs analogues increased the proliferative response of CD4+ Th2 compared to the addition of native CLV. The combination of results from both ADs increased the sensitivity of proliferative assays from 19% to 65% with a specificity higher than 90%. CONCLUSIONS Synthetic ADs from CLV are efficiently recognised by DCs with ability to activate CD4+ Th2 cells from AP. The combination of analogues from both ADs, significantly increased the sensitivity of DC maturation and T-cell proliferation compared to native CLV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Fernandez‐Santamaria
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Departmento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain
| | - Gador Bogas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain
| | - Maria Isabel Montañez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| | - Adriana Ariza
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain
| | - Maria Salas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain
| | - Jose Antonio Cespedes
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Departmento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain
| | - Marina Labella
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain
| | - Juan Luis Paris
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| | - Natalia Perez‐Sanchez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain
| | - Ezequiel Perez‐Inestrosa
- Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| | - Yolanda Vida
- Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| | - Tahia D. Fernandez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Departamento de Biología Celular, Genética y Fisiología, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain
| | - Cristobalina Mayorga
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| | - Maria Jose Torres
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga‐IBIMA‐ARADyALMálagaSpain,Departmento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga‐UMAMálagaSpain,Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga‐HRUMMálagaSpain,Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología‐BIONANDMálagaSpain
| |
Collapse
|