Long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks with lanadelumab: The HELP OLE Study

Hereditary angioedema: current therapeutic management and future approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an account of the focus of therapeutic strategies for hereditary angioedema (HAE), give a brief overview of those used in the past and set aside and toughly discuss those currently available as first line. Further research is ongoing and the future therapeutic approaches that are still in different phases of study will be reviewed as well.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last two decades, major research advancements on HAE pathophysiology and management were made and numerous novel therapeutic options are now available. Compared to the past, drugs available nowadays are more effective, well tolerated, and possibly have a more convenient administration route. Moreover, numerous other drugs with innovative mechanisms of action are under development.

SUMMARY

HAE is a rare genetic disease that if not promptly treated, it can lead to death from asphyxiation. Furthermore, due to its disfiguring and painful manifestations, HAE implies an important burden on the quality of life. Recently, following great research progresses on HAE therapy, evidence-based guidelines on HAE management were released. The therapeutic landscape of HAE is still under florid development, and it is possible novel treatments will remarkably revolutionize HAE management in the future.

An international survey assessing the effects of the duration of attack-free period on health-related quality of life for patients with hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by unpredictable and often severe cutaneous and mucosal swelling that affects the extremities, face, larynx, gastrointestinal tract, or genitourinary area. Introduction of novel long-term prophylactic treatment options (lanadelumab, berotralstat, and C1-esterase inhibitor SC [human]) into the treatment armamentarium has substantially reduced HAE attacks, allowing patients to be attack free for longer with improvements to their quality of life. Using data drawn from a wide-ranging survey of patients with HAE, we examined the relationship between duration of time attack free and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exploring the possibility that there is an association between observed improvement in HRQoL and attack-free duration.

METHODS

A survey among patients with HAE on long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in six countries (the US, Australia, Canada, UK, Germany, and Japan) assessed the relationship between attack-free duration and mean Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) scores, quality of life benefits, and rescue medication used. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to assess the roles of LTP and attack-free period (< 1 month, 1- < 6 months, ≥ 6 months) on total AE-QoL scores. Results include descriptive p-values for strength of association, without control for multiplicity. Descriptive statistics were used to show the relationship between time attack free and quality of life benefits.

RESULTS

Longer durations of time for which participants reported being attack free at the time of the survey correlated with better AE-QoL scores and less use of rescue medication. The mean total AE-QoL scores were 51.8, 33.2, and 19.9 for those who reported having been attack free for < 1 month, 1- < 6 months, and ≥ 6 months, respectively, with higher scores reflecting more impairment. The ANCOVA results showed a strong association between attack-free duration and AE-QoL total score.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that longer attack-free duration has an influential role for better HRQoL in patients receiving LTP. Prolonging the attack-free period is an important goal of therapy and recent advances in LTP have increased attack-free duration. However, opportunities exist for new treatments to further increase attack-free duration and improve HRQoL for all patients with HAE.

Effect of lanadelumab on attack frequency and QoL in Japanese patients with hereditary angioedema: Report of five cases

Lanadelumab, a recombinant human anti-kallikrein monoclonal antibody, is recommended as the first-line option for long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, the efficacy of lanadelumab and its effects on the quality of life (QoL) in Japanese HAE patients using real-world data have not been reported. Herein, we report the outcomes of five HAE patients who were treated with lanadelumab at two Japanese institutions. We retrospectively collected data on attack frequency and on-demand treatment frequency using an angioedema quality of life (AE-QoL) questionnaire. Our data corresponded to five Japanese HAE patients who started lanadelumab treatment: four with HAE due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (HAE-1) and one with HAE with a normal C1-inhibitor (HAE-nC1-INH). Two HAE-1 patients showed a reduction in both attacks and number of on-demand treatments. The other HAE-1 patients had an increase in the number of on-demand treatments, although there was no apparent reduction in attacks. The HAE-nC1-INH patient showed a slight increase in both attacks and number of on-demand treatments. Only one HAE-1 patient discontinued treatment after 1 month owing to side effects, including dizziness and headache. All four who continued treatment showed improved AE-QoL total and domain scores. Therefore, in this study, using real-world data, we demonstrated that lanadelumab reduced attack frequency and improved QoL in Japanese HAE patients.

Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema attack prevention: long-term efficacy, quality of life, and safety data from a phase 2, randomised, open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Garadacimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting activated factor XII. This study evaluated long-term efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety data for garadacimab in adults with hereditary angioedema.

METHODS

This global phase 2 study comprised a treatment period 1 (TP1: 12 weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and a treatment period 2 (TP2: ≥44-week open-label extension). Patients aged 18-65 years with clinically confirmed hereditary angioedema were eligible. In TP1, 32 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous garadacimab (75 mg, 200 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks (once monthly). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology via block randomisation (block sizes 1-4). Subsequently, six additional patients in TP1 were assigned to open-label garadacimab 400 mg every 2 weeks. At the start of TP2, patients were re-randomised (if receiving placebo, garadacimab 75 mg, or garadacimab 400 mg) or continued to receive garadacimab 200 mg or garadacimab 600 mg once monthly. After a protocol amendment on March 20, 2020, patients originally assigned to the 600 mg dose were down-titrated to 200 mg at their next visit. The primary endpoint (published previously) was monthly attack rate for patients receiving 200 mg or 600 mg garadacimab in TP1 in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we assessed the impact of garadacimab on patient-reported and investigator-reported outcomes and HRQoL as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03712228, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Of 54 patients screened between Oct 29, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 32 randomised and six open-label patients completed TP1 and entered TP2 (20 in the garadacimab 200 mg group; 18 in the garadacimab 600 mg group; total 38 patients). Median age was 39·0 years (IQR 27·0-53·0), and 21 patients (55%) were female and 17 (45%) were male. In TP2, the median garadacimab exposure was 87·9 weeks (IQR 50·0-106·6) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 44·1 weeks (24·1-56·1) in the garadacimab 600 mg group. Median monthly attack rates were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·1) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 0·1 (0·0-0·4) in the garadacimb 600 mg group. Median reduction in monthly attack rate versus run-in was 100% (IQR 98-100) with garadacimab 200 mg. HRQoL improvements observed during TP1 with garadacimab were sustained throughout TP2. TP2 safety signals were consistent with TP1. Two patients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-related). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were headache (nine of 38, 24%) and abdominal pain (seven of 38, 18%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Once-monthly garadacimab for more than 2 years in patients with hereditary angioedema was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing monthly attack rate and improving HRQoL. These results reveal the potential of long-term prophylactic treatment with 200 mg once-monthly garadacimab towards complete disease control of patients with hereditary angioedema.

FUNDING

CSL Behring.

The real life experience goes on: update after 4 years on the first cohort treated with lanadelumab at our center

Introduction

Lanadelumab is a first-line long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in hereditary angioedema (HAE). Real-life data on its long-term efficacy and safety are limited. It is unknown whether patients using lanadelumab need short-term prophylaxis (STP).

Objectives

To provide 4-year follow-up data for our first 34 patients treating with lanadelumab.

Methods

Patients were assessed for their current injection interval, attacks, treatment satisfaction, disease control (AECT), quality of life impairment (AE-QoL), events that can induce attacks, and the use of STP since the start of their treatment with lanadelumab.

Results

Of 34 patients who started lanadelumab treatment, 32 were still using it after 4 years, with a median injection interval of 33 (range 14-90) days. HAE patients (n=28) reported longer intervals, i.e. 35 (14-90) days, than patients with angioedema due to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (n=4, 23 (14-31) days). With their current injection intervals, used for a mean duration of 29 ± 17 months, patients reported a yearly attack rate of 0.3 ± 0.1. More than 70% of patients were attack-free since starting their current injection interval. All patients reported well-controlled disease, i.e. ≥10 points in the AECT; 21 patients had complete control (16 points). AE-QoL scores improved further compared to our initial report, most prominently in the fears/shame domain (-6 points). Treatment satisfaction was very high. No angioedema occurred after 146 of 147 potentially attack-inducing medical procedures without STP.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in real-life and question the need for STP in patients who use effective LTP.

Recent advances in the discovery and development of drugs targeting the kallikrein-kinin system

BACKGROUND

The kallikrein-kinin system is a key regulatory cascade involved in blood pressure maintenance, hemostasis, inflammation and renal function. Currently, approved drugs remain limited to the rare disease hereditary angioedema. However, growing interest in this system is indicated by an increasing number of promising drug candidates for further indications.

METHODS

To provide an overview of current drug development, a two-stage literature search was conducted between March and December 2023 to identify drug candidates with targets in the kallikrein-kinin system. First, drug candidates were identified using PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov. Second, the latest publications/results for these compounds were searched in PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar. The findings were categorized by target, stage of development, and intended indication.

RESULTS

The search identified 68 drugs, of which 10 are approved, 25 are in clinical development, and 33 in preclinical development. The three most studied indications included diabetic retinopathy, thromboprophylaxis and hereditary angioedema. The latter is still an indication for most of the drug candidates close to regulatory approval (3 out of 4). For the emerging indications, promising new drug candidates in clinical development are ixodes ricinus-contact phase inhibitor for thromboprophylaxis and RZ402 and THR-149 for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (all phase 2).

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic impact of targeting the kallikrein-kinin system is no longer limited to the treatment of hereditary angioedema. Ongoing research on other diseases demonstrates the potential of therapeutic interventions targeting the kallikrein-kinin system and will provide further treatment options for patients in the future.

Summary and future of medicine for hereditary angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal genetic disease for which there are currently nine FDA-approved drugs. This review summarizes drug treatments for HAE based on four therapeutic pathways: inhibiting the contact system, inhibiting bradykinin binding to B2 receptors, supplying missing C1 inhibitors, and inhibiting plasminogen conversion. The review generalizes the clinical use, pharmacological effects and mechanisms of HAE drugs, and it also discusses possible development directions and targets to enhance understanding of HAE and help researchers.

Kallikrein inhibitors for angioedema: the progress of preclinical and early phase studies

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent edema and predominantly caused by the dysregulation of the kinin-kallikrein system.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript presents the results of preclinical and early clinical trials of newer drugs targeting the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system. ATN-249 is an oral drug that has shown promising results in preclinical and Phase I studies, and good tolerability in the prophylactic treatment of attacks. KVD900 is also an oral agent developed for the on-demand treatment of HAE attacks. It has shown positive results in Phase I/II studies, with rapid absorption. The third drug, IONIS-PKKRx, is an antisense oligonucleotide targeting plasma prekallikrein mRNA. It has shown a dose-dependent reduction of plasma prekallikrein levels and proenzyme activation in Phase I/II studies, and has shown promising results. STAR-0215 is a long acting anti-activated kallikrein monoclonal antibody. A Phase 1a single ascending dose trial evaluated its safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Lastly, NTLA-2002 is an investigational gene-editing therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The targeted treatment of the dysregulated kinin-kallikrein system with specific inhibitors is promising for the prevention of angioedema attacks. Ongoing phase III studies will provide further insight into the efficacy and long-term safety of these novel therapies, potentially expanding treatment options for HAE treatment.

Cardiovascular Autonomic Nervous System in a Patient With Hereditary Angioedema Affected by COVID-19

Autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation in hereditary angioedema (HAE) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. ANS alterations could be manifested during both the acute and post-acute phases of COVID-19. Implications of acute and chronic inflammation on ANS in HAE need to be addressed. In this case report, we monitored the systolic arterial blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity in a female HAE patient both before experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and one month afterward. We also tracked the heart rate variability on the day preceding symptom onset, the day of symptom onset (SYM), the day following SYM, five days after SYM, the day of the first negative nasopharyngeal swab (i.e., 12 days after SYM), and one month after symptom onset. The results of this case report provide the characterization of vascular and cardiac autonomic profiles in an HAE patient until the resolution of an acute infection, a potential trigger for the acute HAE attack.

Patient-level indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab versus pdC1-INH i.v. in hereditary angioedema patients: PATCH study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease in which patients suffer from local attacks primarily affecting skin and gastrointestinal tract, and sometimes even the upper respiratory tract leading to asphyxiation. Since head-to-head trials between authorized treatments are lacking, this study compares efficacy and safety of lanadelumab and intravenous plasma-derived C1-esterase inhibitor (pdC1-INH i.v.) in HAE patients on long-term prophylaxis by means of an indirect treatment comparison.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety of lanadelumab against pdC1-INH i.v. were analyzed in a fully prespecified indirect comparison based on individual patient data (n = 231) from the HELP and CHANGE clinical trials. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were compared using a generalized linear model for count data. Confounding variables were identified a priori via systematic literature research and validated by clinical experts. Adjustment of confounders was implemented using a conditional regression model.

RESULTS

Lanadelumab showed a statistically significant improvement in reduction of HAE attack rates compared to pdC1-INH i.v. across multiple endpoints: Monthly attack rate of patients treated with lanadelumab was less than half compared to pdC1-INH i.v. (Rate ratio: 0.486; 95% CI: 0.253, 0.932). Monthly rate of laryngeal attacks was found to be five times lower for lanadelumab (Rate ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.044, 0.915) and monthly rate of acute treated HAE attacks among lanadelumab patients was about one third of the attack rate of pdC1-INH i.v. patients (Rate ratio: 0.366; 95% CI: 0.185, 0.727).

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to current knowledge in the treatment of HAE by indicating a statistically significant reduction of HAE attacks under lanadelumab compared to pdC1-INH i.v.

Lanadelumab in Patients 2 to Less Than 12 Years Old With Hereditary Angioedema: Results From the Phase 3 SPRING Study

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of hereditary angioedema (HAE) often first occur during childhood, and HAE attacks in children can be severe and substantially affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, there are no approved long-term prophylaxis treatments for children aged less than 6 years.

OBJECTIVE

The SPRING Study (NCT04070326) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of lanadelumab and HRQoL in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years.

METHODS

Over 52 weeks of treatment, patients aged 2 to less than 6 years received lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and patients aged 6 to less than 12 years received 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) but could switch to Q4W if they were attack-free for 26 weeks.

RESULTS

We enrolled 21 patients (aged 2 to less than 6 years: n = 4; aged 6 to less than 12 years: n = 17), 20 of whom completed the study. There were no reported serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations resulting from such events. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 17 patients (81.0%). The most common TEAE was injection site pain. Overall systemic exposure was comparable for both age groups. The mean (SD) attack rate during treatment decreased by 94.8% from baseline (1.84 [1.53] to 0.08 [0.17] attacks/mo), and 16 (76.2%) patients were attack-free. The attack rate reduction in both age groups was similar during the first 26-week fixed-dosing treatment. Seven patients switched from Q2W to Q4W and remained attack-free. A large, clinically meaningful increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale Total Score and a large increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale-Family Impact Module Total Score from baseline to end of study (better HRQoL) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support safety, efficacy, and improved HRQoL with lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W and Q4W regimens for the prevention of HAE attacks in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years.

Efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in Japanese patients with hereditary angioedema: A phase 3 multicenter, open-label study

The safety and efficacy of lanadelumab for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks have not been studied in Japanese patients. We report outcomes from a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study (NCT04180163) of lanadelumab in Japanese patients with HAE. Japanese patients with HAE aged ≥12 years with ≥1 investigator-confirmed HAE attack during the 4-week run-in baseline period were enrolled into the study and received lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks subcutaneously for 52 weeks. Dosing could be reduced to 300 mg every 4 weeks during the second 26-week treatment period if patients had well-controlled symptoms (e.g., attack-free) for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was no investigator-confirmed HAE attacks (attack-free status) during days 0-182. Other outcomes included the rate of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks per month (28 days) and lanadelumab safety. Twelve patients (mean ± SD age 41.9 ± 12.4 years) were enrolled. During the first 26 weeks (days 0-182), five (41.7%) patients were attack-free. The mean ± SD HAE attack rate per month decreased by 74.0%, from 3.8 ± 2.4 during baseline to 1.2 ± 2.6 during the overall 52-week treatment period. There were no deaths or discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), no severe or serious TEAEs related to lanadelumab, and no positive anti-drug antibody results. The most frequent TEAEs were injection-site reactions (37 events in six patients). Most of the injection-site reaction adverse events were mild in severity. Results of this study support the findings from two global phase 3 studies for lanadelumab use as prophylactic therapy in Japanese patients with HAE.

Hereditary Angioedema: A Review of the Current and Evolving Treatment Landscape

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by sudden and often unprovoked episodes of swelling that can be potentially life-threatening when it involves the upper airway. The treatment options for both acute episodes of HAE and LTP, used to minimize the frequency and severity of angioedema attacks, were limited historically to very few options, had considerable side effects, and/or had considerable burden of treatment. Fortunately, through the elucidation of the pathophysiology of HAE, the development of newer targeted therapies has been possible both for acute therapy and long-term prophylaxis and even more are on the horizon. Because of the rapid development of these therapies, it can be challenging for clinicians to keep abreast of newer and developing treatments for HAE. This review article will outline the current and potential future treatments for HAE. It will also highlight important considerations when treating special HAE patient populations including women and pediatric patients.

A safety review of prophylaxis drugs for adolescent patients with hereditary angioedema

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent subcutaneously and/or submucosally localized edematous swellings. The first symptoms often appear in childhood, and they may become more frequent and severe in puberty. Since the appearance of HAE attacks is unpredictable regarding the localization and the frequency, the attacks put a significant burden on the patients and crucially impacts their quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

This review article analyzes the safety data acquired from the clinical trials conducted with the currently available medicinal products for the prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency and the safety data of observatory studies based on clinical practice. A review of the published literature was conducted using the PubMed database, clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, and abstracts published at scientific conferences.

EXPERT OPINION

The currently available therapeutic products have a good safety and efficiency profile and the international guidelines recommend them as first-line treatments. The choice should be made based on the evaluation of the availability and the preference of the patient.

Network meta-analysis for indirect comparison of lanadelumab and berotralstat for the treatment of hereditary angioedema

Aim: With no head-to-head studies comparing the effectiveness of lanadelumab and berotralstat for prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to indirectly compare the effectiveness of these treatments. Materials & methods: The NMA, using the published data from Phase III trials, was performed using a frequentist weighted regression-based approach following Rücker et al. Efficacy outcomes of interest were HAE attack rate per 28 days and ≥90% reduction in monthly HAE attacks. Results & conclusion: In this NMA, lanadelumab 300 mg administered every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks was associated with statistically significantly higher effectiveness versus berotralstat 150 mg once daily (q.d.) or 110 mg q.d. for both efficacy outcomes assessed.

Content validation and psychometric evaluation of the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire for hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

There is considerable burden of illness in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in HAE are limited. The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) was developed to measure HRQoL in patients with recurrent angioedema; the validity of the AE-QoL in patients with HAE is described.

METHODS

To identify disease-related experiences with a focus on the impact of HAE on HRQoL, interviews were conducted with a group of clinician experts and patients with HAE from Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, along with a targeted literature review. Concepts were mapped to the AE-QoL to assess item relevance, interpretation, and conceptual coverage. Cognitive interviews assessed item clarity and relevance. A psychometric validation was performed using data from a phase 3 trial.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with seven clinicians and 40 adult patients. Patients reported 35 unique impacts of HAE on their lives, the most frequent being on work/school, social relationships, physical activities, and emotions, particularly fear/worrying and anxiety. Saturation for these impacts was reached, and all concepts covered in the AE-QoL were reported during the interviews. Patients agreed that the questionnaire items and response options were clear and relevant, and the 4-week recall period was appropriate. The psychometric validation included data from 64 patients. For AE-QoL total scores, excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient > 0.80), convergent validity with the Sheehan Disability Scale (r = 0.663), divergent validity with the EQ-5D-5L index (r = 0.292) and EQ-VAS (r = 0.337), and known-groups validity (p < 0.0001; ɳ2 = 0.56) were demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative and psychometric analyses showed that the AE-QoL is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring HRQoL in adult patients with HAE from six countries.

[Hereditary angioedema and its new treatments: An update]

Hereditary angioedema, with or without deficient C1 inhibitor level or function, is a rare disease characterized by recurrent attacks of noninflammatory subcutaneous and/or submucosal edema. It may be life-threatening and substantially affects quality of life. Attacks may be spontaneous or induced, in a setting of emotional stress, by infections or physical trauma, in particular. As the key mediator is bradykinin, this angioedema does not respond to the usual treatments of mast cell-mediated angioedema (antihistamines, corticosteroids, adrenaline), which is much more frequent. Therapeutic management of hereditary angioedema first consists in treating severe attacks with a selective B2 bradykinin receptor antagonist or a C1 inhibitor concentrate. The latter or an attenuated androgen (danazol) can be used for short-term prophylaxis. Therapeutic solutions conventionally proposed for long-term prophylaxis (danazol, antifibrinolytics [tranexamic acid], C1 inhibitor concentrate) vary in efficacy and/or pose problems of safety or ease of use. Kallikrein inhibitors (subcutaneous lanadelumab, oral berotralstat) recently made available as disease-modifying treatment constitute an important advance in long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema attacks. The advent of these new drugs is accompanied by a new ambition for patients: optimize control of the disease and thereby minimize its impact on quality of life.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with a focus on hereditary angioedema

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been shown to be effective and generally safe across a continually expanding list of therapeutic areas. We describe the advantages and limitations of mAbs as a therapeutic option compared with small molecules. Specifically, we discuss a novel mAb in the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by recurrent unpredictable swelling attacks. HAE is mediated by dysregulation of plasma kallikrein activity leading to overproduction of bradykinin. Current prophylactic treatment for HAE includes androgens or replacement of the endogenous plasma kallikrein inhibitor, C1 inhibitor. However, there remains an unmet need for an effective, less burdensome treatment option. Lanadelumab is a fully human mAb targeting plasma kallikrein. Results from clinical trials, including a pivotal Phase 3 study and its ensuing open-label extension study, demonstrated that lanadelumab is associated with few treatment-related adverse events and reduced the rate of HAE attacks. This novel treatment option has the potential to significantly improve the lives of patients with HAE.

Safety Aspects and Rational Use of Lanadelumab Injections in the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE): Clinical Insights

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of skin/mucosal swelling, and/or attacks of severe abdominal pain when it affects the gastrointestinal tract. The disease might be unexpectedly fatal when the upper airways are compromised. HAE clinical presentation, disease course and prognosis are associated with significant disease burden and severely impaired quality of life. Lanadelumab is a breakthrough therapy for the prevention of attacks in HAE type 1 and 2 patients. This revolutionary approach to administer a single subcutaneous injection (once every two to four weeks) and achieve complete disease control has dramatically improved patient care resulting in significant change in the life of affected families. Current data support the drug's tolerability in adult and adolescent patients without notable safety concerns in both clinical research and real-world settings. Rational use of prophylactic treatments of HAE searches for a socio-economic balance, taking into account the life-long course of the disease, the public health funds who pay the monetary price, and the patients who might need to receive the therapy for a period longer than investigated during the development program. In this review, we address the current evidence on lanadelumab's tolerability, highlighting aspects of the drug's rationale use in clinical practice. Further studies need to investigate whether this therapy might be appropriate in other forms of angioedema, such as idiopathic primary angioedema and HAE with normal C1 inhibitor. Future efforts must focus to improve modern drugs' accessibility in more countries. Although modern prophylactic options lessen the risk of fatal laryngeal attacks, patients must be equipped with reliable on-demand therapies and be trained how to use them as such a risk cannot be fully diminished with potentially life-threatening attacks occurring even in subjects with successful and stable long-term prophylaxis. Notwithstanding, further studies are needed to identify early responders from non-responders and develop therapies for the latter.

Effectiveness and safety of lanadelumab in ethnic and racial minority subgroups of patients with hereditary angioedema: results from phase 3 studies

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted disparities in healthcare, particularly in the United States, even though disparities have existed since the organization of the modern healthcare system. Recruitment of patients from racial and ethnic minority groups is often minimal in phase 3 clinical trials, and is further exacerbated in the case of trials for rare diseases such as hereditary angioedema (HAE). This can lead to a gap in the understanding of minority patients’ experiences with these diseases and their response to potential treatment options.

Methods

We reviewed data from phase 3 double-blind (HELP) and open-label extension (HELP OLE) trials of lanadelumab, a monoclonal antibody developed for long-term prophylaxis against attacks of HAE. Efficacy (attack rate reduction) and safety (adverse events) results from White patients were compared descriptively to those from Hispanic/Latino patients, Black/African Americans, and other minority Americans.

Results

Not surprisingly, few minorities were recruited across both studies: 9.5% Black, 2.4% Asian, and 7.1% Hispanic/Latino versus 88.1% White and 91.7% non-Hispanic/non-Latino received lanadelumab in HELP, and 4.7% Black, 0.9% Asian, 0.9% other, and 6.1% Hispanic/Latino versus 93.4% White and 93.4% non-Hispanic/non-Latino were enrolled in HELP OLE. Although these studies were conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Jordan, all minorities were from the United States. Despite the number of minority patients being far less than expected for the population, there was no evidence that either efficacy or adverse event profiles differed between ethnic or racial groups.

Conclusions

The HELP and HELP OLE studies described herein recruited far fewer minorities than would be ideal to represent these populations. However, evidence suggests that the effectiveness and tolerance of lanadelumab are similar between the groups. Nonetheless, the disparity in recruitment into research for minorities has significant room for improvement.

Trial registration NCT02586805, registered 26 October 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02586805. NCT02741596, registered 18 April 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02741596.

Treatment of hereditary angioedema—single or multiple pathways to the rescue

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease caused by mutations in the SERPING1 gene. This results in deficient or dysfunctional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) and affects multiple proteases involved in the complement, contact-system, coagulation, and fibrinolytic pathways. Current options for the treatment and prevention of HAE attacks include treating all affected pathways via direct C1-INH replacement therapy; or specifically targeting components of the contact activation system, in particular by blocking the bradykinin B₂ receptor (B2R) or inhibiting plasma kallikrein, to prevent bradykinin generation. Intravenously administered plasma-derived C1-INH (pdC1-INH) and recombinant human C1-INH have demonstrated efficacy and safety for treatment of HAE attacks, although time to onset of symptom relief varied among trials, specific agents, and dosing regimens. Data from retrospective and observational analyses support that short-term prophylaxis with intravenous C1-INH products can help prevent HAE attacks in patients undergoing medical or dental procedures. Long-term prophylaxis with intravenous or subcutaneous pdC1-INH significantly decreased the HAE attack rate vs. placebo, although breakthrough attacks were observed. Pathway-specific therapies for the management of HAE include the B2R antagonist icatibant and plasma kallikrein inhibitors ecallantide, lanadelumab, and berotralstat. Icatibant, administered for treatment of angioedema attacks, reduced B2R-mediated vascular permeability and, compared with placebo, reduced the time to initial symptom improvement. Plasma kallikrein inhibitors, such as ecallantide, block the binding site of kallikrein to prevent cleavage of high molecular weight kininogen and subsequent bradykinin generation. Ecallantide was shown to be efficacious for HAE attacks and is licensed for this indication in the United States, but the labeling recommends that only health care providers administer treatment because of the risk of anaphylaxis. In addition to C1-INH replacement therapy, the plasma kallikrein inhibitors lanadelumab and berotralstat are recommended as first-line options for long-term prophylaxis and have demonstrated marked reductions in HAE attack rates. Investigational therapies, including the activated factor XII inhibitor garadacimab and an antisense oligonucleotide targeting plasma prekallikrein messenger RNA (donidalorsen), have shown promise as long-term prophylaxis. Given the requirement of lifelong management for HAE, further research is needed to determine how best to individualize optimal treatments for each patient.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare disease characterized by unpredictable swelling attacks that may be life-threatening when affecting the upper airways. Understanding the pathophysiology of HAE and the mechanism of bradykinin-mediated angioedema allowed the development of new therapies for the treatment of HAE: clinical trials are ongoing to expand the number of drugs available for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis.

AREAS COVERED

Authors discuss the products that have been used to treat this disease for many years and present the most recently marketed products and those which are under development.

EXPERT OPINION

Significant therapeutic progress has been made in HAE. In particular, drugs targeting specific molecules involved in the angioedema formation were developed and studies with new drugs are ongoing. In the coming years, more effective therapies with easier administration route options for on-demand treatment and long-term prophylaxis will be available to treat this disease and the variety of patients. Gene therapy strategies may offer a definitive treatment. High costs of current and new drugs may be a limiting factor for their availability, especially in developing countries.

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema-The 2021 revision and update

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1 inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1 inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: (1) How should HAE be diagnosed? (2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? (3) What are the goals of treatment? (4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast-feeding women? and (5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients.

Recognition and Management of Hereditary Angioedema: Best Practices for Dermatologists

Objective

The goal of this article is to discuss the importance of differentiating hereditary angioedema (HAE) from other types of angioedema, describe advances in HAE management, especially long-term prophylaxis (LTP), and offer practical recommendations for dermatologists.

Commentary

While HAE is rare, dermatologists are likely to encounter patients with this condition at some point over the course of their clinical practice due to the fact that HAE episodes typically involve subcutaneous swelling and sometimes erythema marginatum. HAE is characterized by recurrent episodes of painful and/or disabling bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Unfortunately, HAE is commonly mistaken for other conditions such as allergic and other mast cell-mediated angioedema, but has very different treatment requirements. Delayed diagnosis of HAE can result in years of avoidable debilitating symptoms, inappropriate treatment, potentially unnecessary invasive intervention, and reduced quality of life, and can be life threatening. Thus, timely identification of HAE is essential to ensure appropriate clinical management. Patients with HAE have either deficiency or dysfunction of the C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein that inhibits proteases in the contact, complement, and fibrinolytic systems. Pathway-specific HAE treatments include C1INH replacement, kallikrein inhibitors, and bradykinin receptor antagonists. Treatment options for managing acute attacks include C1INH replacement (plasma-derived or recombinant formulations), icatibant (kallikrein inhibitor), and ecallantide (bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist). In the past 5 years, several new options for LTP have been approved, including a subcutaneous plasma-derived C1INH formulation and two kallikrein inhibitors (lanadelumab; berotralstat). Optimal management of HAE entails the creation of a comprehensive management plan that addresses both acute and long-term patient needs and includes input from an HAE expert and the patient/caregivers.

Angioedema and Fatty Acids

Angioedema is a life-threatening emergency event that is associated with bradykinin and histamine-mediated cascades. Although bradykinin-mediated angioedema currently has specific therapeutic options, angioedema is sometimes intractable with current treatments, especially histamine-mediated angioedema, suggesting that some other mediators might contribute to the development of angioedema. Fatty acids are an essential fuel and cell component, and act as a mediator in physiological and pathological human diseases. Recent updates of studies revealed that these fatty acids are involved in vascular permeability and vasodilation, in addition to bradykinin and histamine-mediated reactions. This review summarizes each fatty acid’s function and the specific receptor signaling responses in blood vessels, and focuses on the possible pathogenetic role of fatty acids in angioedema.