IL-4 and IL-13 both contribute to the homeostasis of human conjunctival goblet cells in vitro

Monoclonal antibodies for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a look at phase III and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis has rapidly expanded in recent years, catalyzing the development of new targeted monoclonal antibody treatments for AD.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to summarize the latest clinical and molecular data about monoclonal antibodies that are in later stages of development for AD, either in Phase 3 trials or in the pharmacopoeia for up to 5 years, highlighting the biologic underpinning of each drug's mechanism of action and the potential modulation of the AD immune profile.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic pipeline of AD treatments is speedily progressing, introducing the potential for a personalized medical approach in the near future. Understanding how targeting pathogenic players in AD modifies disease progression and symptomatology is key in improving therapeutic choices for patients and identifying ideal patient candidates.

Ocular surface disease in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients and the effect of biological therapy

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which new targeted therapies are currently available. Due to the increased rates of ocular surface disease (OSD) reported during treatment with these new targeted treatments, more insight into the occurrence and pathomechanism of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients is needed. Therefore, this review's first part highlights that most patients with moderate-to-severe AD already have characteristics of OSD before starting targeted treatment. Remarkably, not all AD patients with OSD report ocular symptoms. OSD in AD is associated with less conjunctival goblet cells (GC) compared to healthy controls. In addition, OSD severity in AD patients is associated with high AD activity, the presence of eyelid and/or facial eczema, and high levels of AD-related severity biomarkers in tear fluid. The second part of this review highlights that pre-existing ocular pathology (e.g. in combination with the use of ophthalmic medication or eyelid eczema) may be associated with the development of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD). During dupilumab treatment, DAOSD (which can be new-onset OSD or worsening of pre-existing OSD) is observed in approximately one-third of the dupilumab-treated AD patients. Anti-inflammatory ophthalmic treatment improves DAOSD, and dose reduction of dupilumab may also be an effective treatment option. The pathomechanism of DAOSD is still not fully elucidated. In a prospective study low, but stable conjunctival GC numbers were observed in moderate-to-severe AD patients, before and during dupilumab treatment. However, the Mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC) expression of GCs decreased during dupilumab treatment, suggesting an impairment of the GC function by dupilumab treatment. In addition, higher dupilumab tear fluid levels were found in dupilumab-treated AD patients with moderate-to-severe OSD compared to patients with no or mild OSD, whereas the dupilumab serum levels are similar. Clinicians should be aware of the frequent occurrence of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients, and a low-threshold referral to an ophthalmologist is recommended.

[Current aspects of vernal and atopic keratoconjunctivitis]

BACKGROUND

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) are complex and rare diseases. Thus, their diagnosis and treatment are often a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

Discussion on the epidemiology, new pathogenetic concepts, interesting clinical findings, diagnostic possibilities and new treatment options and their side effects in severe ocular allergies. Analysis of the presentation of VKC in the internet.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Evaluation of recent review articles, original publications, and case reports on the topics of VKC and AKC over the past 5 years.

RESULTS

Ocular allergies have significantly increased over the last decades. Recent concepts discussed in the pathogenesis of VKC and AKC are the role of the local and gut microbiome as well as the influence of neuroinflammation. Keratoconus is significantly more common in patients with VKC and AKC compared to the normal population. It is associated with faster progression and a more severe course of disease. A conjunctival provocation test is only rarely necessary in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with dupilumab, an interleukin 4 receptor alpha (IL-4Ra) antagonist, can cause ocular side effects. Unfortunately, information available on the internet for patients and parents on the topic of VKC is sometimes dangerously incorrect.

CONCLUSION

From the abovementioned new pathogenetic concepts, preventive and personalized treatment options could be developed in the future. Keratoconus in AKC/VKC must be recognized and treated early. Official guidelines are now available for a standardized conjunctival provocation test in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. The unwanted ocular side effects of dupilumab are often difficult to discriminate from the actual underlying AKC and respond well to anti-inflammatory treatment. Patients with VKC must be informed about the incorrect information on the internet regarding their disease.

Podcast on Cross-speciality Perspectives on Practical Management of Atopic Dermatitis-Associated Ocular Surface Diseases

There is a growing awareness among dermatology providers of ocular comorbidities in patients with the chronic inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis (AD). For example, the prevalence of ocular surface diseases (OSD) such as conjunctivitis is higher in patients with AD than in the general population, and the use of some AD treatments may be associated with OSD. In a recent review published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, dermatologists and ophthalmologists provided an overview of the different types, etiology, pathophysiology, and practical management of OSD associated with AD. This review included a suggested treatment algorithm that champions a partnership between dermatology providers and eye care providers for optimal screening, diagnosis, and care. In this podcast article, a dermatologist and ophthalmologist who were authors on this review are joined by a nurse practitioner moderator to discuss how these concepts can be adapted to clinical practice, inclusive of dermatologists, eye care providers, and relevant advanced practice providers. This podcast focuses on the authors' clinical experiences and highlights the key aspects of optimal care, including exploring additional questions to answer with future research.

Atopic dermatitis and ocular allergy: common mechanisms and uncommon questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atopic dermatitis (AD) and ocular allergy aka allergic eye disease (AED) are two common conditions that often coexist in patients. However, molecular connections between these two conditions are incompletely understood. While common etiologic components including Th2 immune signaling have been suggested for AD and AED, the mechanism how current Th2-targetd therapies (dupilumab, tralokinumab) for AD can augment conjunctivitis is not well understood.

RECENT FINDINGS

Differentially regulated genes and pathways relevant for AD disease manifestation are known. In contrast, similar information is not yet available for AED, which could be largely addressed by emerging noninvasive ocular sampling techniques. Emerging evidence indicated a reduction in goblet cell number and mucin production in a subpopulation of AD patients with AD leading to adverse ocular outcomes, while other potential mechanisms could also be involved. Involvement of particular barrier function protein(s) in AED needs further investigation.

SUMMARY

Modern cytokine-targeted therapies for AD showed elevated risk for developing conjunctivitis. Recently developed noninvasive sampling techniques should be leveraged to identify AD endotypes associated with AED and with dupilumab-associated ocular outcomes.

Analyses of Dupilumab-Related Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions Using the WHO's VigiBase

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is a drug that inhibits the action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 and is a potent therapeutic drug for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Although its use has been associated with significant ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the IL-4 and IL-13 inhibition may also have favorable therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to determine the disease spectrum in which the use of dupilumab may have been associated with an increase or decrease of ocular ADRs.

METHODS

We searched the World Health Organization's VigiBase for ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab for data up to 12 June 2022. The number of all ADRs that were retrieved was compared with the number of ocular ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab. Disproportionate reporting was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) values and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of dupilumab, 100,267 ADRs have been reported. Of all the ADRs associated with dupilumab, 28,522 ADRs were ocular complications, and it ranked fourth in the ocular complications by organ level. By assessments of the IC for age ≤ 44 years, the most significantly associated ADRs were dry eye followed by blepharitis including eyelid crusting and dryness and conjunctivitis. Crusting and dryness of the eyelids were the most significant ADRs for all age groups. Other ocular ADRs reported include meibomian gland dysfunction, keratitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders. In contrast, periorbital edema, neuro-ophthalmic disorders, optic neuritis, and macular edema were significantly reduced by the use of dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab-related ADRs included an increase or decrease of various ocular disorders. The results indicate that dupilumab also has potential therapeutic effects.

Anti-inflammatory and biologic drugs for atopic dermatitis: a therapeutic approach in children and adolescents

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous pathogenesis correlated with dysregulation of the immune system and a prevalence of the T2-mediated immune pathway. Recent understanding of the pathogenesis of AD has allowed the development of new drugs targeting different mechanisms and cytokines that have changed the treatment approach. The aim of this review is to update knowledge on the standard of care and recent advancements in the control of skin inflammation. In light of recent guidelines, we report on the clinical efficacy of novel treatments, with special attention to situations where biologics and small molecules are involved.

Safety of Lebrikizumab in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL-13 with high potency.

OBJECTIVES

To report integrated safety of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from phase 2 and 3 studies.

METHODS

Five double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled studies; one randomized open-label study; one adolescent open-label, single-arm study; and one long-term safety study were summarized in two datasets: (1) placebo-controlled week 0-16 (All-PC Week 0-16) in patients who received lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (LEBQ2W) versus placebo and (2) patients who received any dose of lebrikizumab at any time during the studies (All-LEB). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IR)/100 patient-years (PY) are provided.

RESULTS

A total of 1720 patients received lebrikizumab (1637.0 PY exposure). In All-PC Week 0-16, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between treatment groups; most events were nonserious and mild or moderate in severity. The most frequently reported TEAEs were atopic dermatitis (placebo) and conjunctivitis (LEBQ2W). Frequencies of conjunctivitis cluster were 2.5% (placebo) and 8.5% (LEBQ2W), and all events were mild or moderate (All-LEB 10.6%, IR, 12.2). Frequencies of injection site reactions were 1.5% (placebo) and 2.6% (LEBQ2W; All-LEB 3.1%, IR, 3.3). Frequencies of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were 1.4% (placebo) and 2.3% (LEBQ2W; All-LEB 4.2%, IR, 4.5).

CONCLUSION

The safety profile for lebrikizumab consisted of TEAEs that were mostly nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and did not lead to treatment discontinuation. The safety profile was similar in both adults and adolescents.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT02465606, NCT02340234, NCT03443024, NCT04146363, NCT04178967, NCT04250337, NCT04250350, NCT04392154 Safety of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis of eight clinical trials (MP4 34165 KB).

Two Phase 3 Trials of Lebrikizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-13, prevents the formation of the interleukin-4Rα-interleukin-13Rα1 heterodimer receptor signaling complex.

METHODS

We conducted two identically designed, 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials; both trials included a 16-week induction period and a 36-week maintenance period. Eligible patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (adults [≥18 years of age] and adolescents [12 to <18 years of age, weighing ≥40 kg]) were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either lebrikizumab at a dose of 250 mg (loading dose of 500 mg at baseline and week 2) or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Outcomes for the induction period were assessed up to 16 weeks and are included in this report. The primary outcome was an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (indicating clear or almost clear skin; range, 0 to 4 [severe disease]) with a reduction (indicating improvement) of at least 2 points from baseline at week 16. Secondary outcomes included a 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score (EASI-75 response) and assessments of itch and of itch interference with sleep. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

In trial 1, the primary outcome was met in 43.1% of 283 patients in the lebrikizumab group and in 12.7% of 141 patients in the placebo group (P<0.001); an EASI-75 response occurred in 58.8% and 16.2%, respectively (P<0.001). In trial 2, the primary outcome was met in 33.2% of 281 patients in the lebrikizumab group and in 10.8% of 146 patients in the placebo group (P<0.001); an EASI-75 response occurred in 52.1% and 18.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Measures of itch and itch interference with sleep indicated improvement with lebrikizumab therapy. The incidence of conjunctivitis was higher among patients who received lebrikizumab than among those who received placebo. Most adverse events during the induction period were mild or moderate in severity and did not lead to trial discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the induction period of two phase 3 trials, 16 weeks of treatment with lebrikizumab was effective in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. (Funded by Dermira; ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04146363 and NCT04178967, respectively.).

Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial (ADhere)

Importance

Lebrikizumab (LEB), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-13, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) during 16 weeks of monotherapy in a phase 2b trial, and two 52-week phase 3 trials.

Objective

To evaluate efficacy and safety of LEB combined with low- to mid-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The ADhere trial was a 16-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo (PBO)-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from February 3, 2020, to September 16, 2021. The study was conducted at 54 outpatient sites across Germany, Poland, Canada, and the US and included adolescent (aged ≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40 kg) and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The treatment allocation ratio was 2:1 (LEB:PBO).

Interventions

Overall, 211 patients were randomized to subcutaneous LEB (loading dose of 500 mg at baseline and week 2, followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] thereafter) or PBO Q2W in combination with TCS for 16 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Efficacy analyses at week 16 included proportions of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with 2 or more points improvement from baseline, and 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Key secondary end points included evaluation of itch, itch interference on sleep, and quality of life. Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs).

Results

The mean (SD) age of patients was 37.2 (19.3) years, 103 (48.8%) patients were women, 31 (14.7%) patients were Asian, and 28 (13.3%) patients were Black/African American. At week 16, IGA (0,1) was achieved by 145 (41.2%) patients in the LEB+TCS group vs 66 (22.1%) receiving PBO+TCS (P = .01); corresponding proportions of patients achieving EASI-75 were 69.5% vs 42.2% (P < .001). The LEB+TCS group showed statistically significant improvements in all key secondary end points. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nonserious, mild or moderate in severity, and did not lead to study discontinuation. The TEAEs frequently reported in the LEB+TCS group included conjunctivitis (7 [4.8%]), headache (7 [4.8%]), hypertension (4 [2.8%]), injection site reactions (4 [2.8%]), and herpes infection (5 [3.4%]) vs 1.5% or less patient-reported frequencies in the PBO+TCS group. Similar frequencies of patient-reported serious AEs following LEB+TCS (n = 2, 1.4%) and PBO+TCS (n = 1, 1.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial, LEB+TCS was associated with improved outcomes in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD compared with TCS alone, and safety was consistent with previously reported AD trials.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04250337.

High dupilumab levels in tear fluid of atopic dermatitis patients with moderate-to-severe ocular surface disease

BACKGROUND

The patho-mechanism of ocular surface disease (OSD) in dupilumab-treated atopic dermatitis (AD) patients remains unclear. The aim of this study is to measure dupilumab levels in tear fluid and serum, and relate these findings to the severity of OSD during dupilumab treatment in AD patients.

METHODS

This prospective study included dupilumab-treated moderate-to-severe AD patients who were seen by a dermatologist and an ophthalmologist before the start of dupilumab (baseline), and after 4 and 28 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Dupilumab levels in tear fluid and serum were measured by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Additionally, a pilot study was conducted to measure dupilumab on conjunctival epithelial cells using flow cytometry and LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

At baseline, 89.6% (n = 43/48) of the patients had OSD, with 50.0% having moderate-to-severe OSD. After 28 weeks of dupilumab treatment, the median dupilumab tear fluid levels were 0.55 mg/L (IQR 0.35-1.31) and 0.29 mg/L (IQR 0.16-0.60) in patients with moderate-to-severe OSD and patients with no or mild OSD, respectively (p = 0.02). Dupilumab levels could be detected on conjunctival epithelial cells of 5 AD patients treated with dupilumab for 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Patients with moderate-to-severe OSD had higher dupilumab tear fluid levels compared to patients with no or mild OSD, indicating that dupilumab reaches the ocular surface. Dupilumab was also detected in conjunctival cell suspensions and was found to directly bind CD45-conjunctival epithelial cells. This suggests that AD-induced changes of the conjunctival epithelium may play a role in the development of OSD as well as increased local drug availability.

Safety of tralokinumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: pooled analysis of five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II and phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the activity of interleukin-13, a key pathogenic driver of atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials including adults with moderate-to-severe AD, of up to 52 weeks' duration, showed tralokinumab was efficacious and well tolerated.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the safety profile of tralokinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Safety and laboratory measures were assessed in pooled analyses of phase II and III placebo-controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate-to-severe AD (NCT02347176, NCT03562377, NCT03131648, NCT03160885, NCT03363854).

RESULTS

In total, 2285 patients were randomized in the initial treatment periods up to 16 weeks (1605 tralokinumab, 680 placebo). The frequencies of any adverse event (AE) were 65·7% for tralokinumab and 67·2% for placebo. The respective rates were 640 and 678 events per 100 patient-years of exposure (ep100PYE); rate ratio 1·0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·9-1·1. Serious AEs occurred in 2·1% of patients with tralokinumab and 2·8% with placebo (7·4 and 11·9 ep100PYE; rate ratio 0·7, 95% CI 0·4-1·2). The most common AEs occurring at a higher frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo were: viral upper respiratory tract infection (15·7% vs. 12·2%; 65·1 vs. 53·5 ep100PYE); upper respiratory tract infection (5·6% vs. 4·8%; 20·8 vs. 18·5 ep100PYE); conjunctivitis (5·4% vs. 1·9%; 21·0 vs. 6·9 ep100PYE); and injection-site reaction (3·5% vs. 0·3%; 22·9 vs. 4·0 ep100PYE). Some events in safety areas of interest occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo: skin infections requiring systemic treatment (2·6% vs. 5·5%; 9·7 vs. 22·8 ep100PYE), eczema herpeticum (0·3% vs. 1·5%; 1·2 vs. 5·2 ep100PYE), opportunistic infections (3·4% vs. 4·9%; 13·0 vs. 21·3 ep100PYE) and serious infections (0·4% vs. 1·1%; 1·3 vs. 3·7 ep100PYE). AEs did not increase with continued maintenance and open-label treatment, including rates of common or serious AEs and AEs leading to study drug discontinuation. No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed with treatment up to 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Across the AD population pool from five clinical trials, tralokinumab was well tolerated, with consistent safety findings during treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The safety profile during prolonged tralokinumab treatment was consistent with that during the initial treatment period; the frequency of events did not increase over time. What is already known about this topic? Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key cytokine driving skin inflammation and epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis (AD). In clinical trials in moderate-to-severe AD, tralokinumab provided significant and early improvements in the extent and severity of AD and was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile comparable with placebo over 52 weeks. What does this study add? We report the frequency and rate of adverse events (AEs) from pooled observations of over 2000 patients from five phase II and phase III placebo-controlled clinical trials of tralokinumab in moderate-to-severe AD. During initial treatment up to 16 weeks, the frequencies of any AE and of serious AEs were similar for tralokinumab and placebo. AE rates did not increase with continued treatment up to 52 weeks. Common AEs occurring more frequently with tralokinumab vs. placebo were viral and upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction. Some events occurred at a lower frequency and rate with tralokinumab vs. placebo, such as skin infections requiring systemic treatment, eczema herpeticum and opportunistic and serious infections. No clinically meaningful changes in mean laboratory measures were observed.

Biologics for allergy: therapeutic potential for ocular allergic diseases and adverse effects on the eye

Biologics applying antibodies against IgE, IL-5, IL-5 receptor α, IL-4 receptor α, and IL-13 have dramatically improved recent treatment outcomes in allergic diseases including asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. However, these drugs have not been approved for ocular allergic diseases such as allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Although the putative mechanisms suggest that these drugs should have beneficial effects in patients with ocular allergies and some studies have reported such beneficial effects, various adverse ocular symptoms have also been observed in clinical trials and off-label use studies. Since ocular allergic diseases have distinct pathogeneses, each biologic drug must be examined regarding specific effects on each ocular allergy. For example, IgE-mediated type 1 hypersensitivity plays a critical role in allergic conjunctivitis. By contrast, T cells and eosinophilic and non-IgE-mediated type 2 inflammation play important roles in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergists must fully understand the effects of each drug on the eye. This review outlines both potential therapeutic and adverse effects of various biologics on allergic diseases of the eye.

Dupilumab in children aged 6 months to younger than 6 years with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Current systemic treatments for children younger than 6 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that is uncontrolled with topical therapies might have suboptimal efficacy and safety. Dupilumab is approved for older children and adults with atopic dermatitis and for other type 2 inflammatory conditions. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids in children aged 6 months to younger than 6 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial was conducted in 31 hospitals, clinics, and academic institutions in Europe and North America. Eligible patients were aged 6 months to younger than 6 years, with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score 3-4) diagnosed according to consensus criteria of the American Academy of Dermatology, and an inadequate response to topical corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to subcutaneous placebo or dupilumab (bodyweight ≥5 kg to <15 kg: 200 mg; bodyweight ≥15 kg to <30 kg: 300 mg) every 4 weeks plus low-potency topical corticosteroids (hydrocortisone acetate 1% cream) for 16 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by age, baseline bodyweight, and region. Patient allocation was done via a central interactive web response system, and treatment allocation was masked. The primary endpoint at week 16 was the proportion of patients with IGA score 0-1 (clear or almost clear skin). The key secondary endpoint (coprimary endpoint for the EU and EU reference market) at week 16 was the proportion of patients with at least a 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). Primary analyses were done in the full analysis set (ie, all randomly assigned patients, as randomly assigned) and safety analyses were done in all patients who received any study drug. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03346434.

FINDINGS

Between June 30, 2020, and Feb 12, 2021, 197 patients were screened for eligibility, 162 of whom were randomly assigned to receive dupilumab (n=83) or placebo (n=79) plus topical corticosteroids. At week 16, significantly more patients in the dupilumab group than in the placebo group had IGA 0-1 (23 [28%] vs three [4%], difference 24% [95% CI 13-34]; p<0·0001) and EASI-75 (44 [53%] vs eight [11%], difference 42% [95% CI 29-55]; p<0·0001). Overall prevalence of adverse events was similar in the dupilumab group (53 [64%] of 83 patients) and placebo group (58 [74%] of 78 patients). Conjunctivitis incidence was higher in the dupilumab group (four [5%]) than the placebo group (none). No dupilumab-related adverse events were serious or led to treatment discontinuation.

INTERPRETATION

Dupilumab significantly improved atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms versus placebo in children younger than 6 years. Dupilumab was well tolerated and showed an acceptable safety profile, similar to results in older children and adults.

FUNDING

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.