Focused echocardiography: a systematic review of diagnostic and clinical decision-making in anaesthesia and critical care

Characterizing Cardiac Function in ICU Survivors of Sepsis: A Pilot Study Protocol

Background

Sepsis is one of the most common reasons for ICU admission and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. More than one-half of survivors experience significant physical, psychological, or cognitive impairments, often termed post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Sepsis is recognized increasingly as being associated with a risk of adverse cardiovascular events that is comparable with other major cardiovascular risk factors. It is plausible that sepsis survivors may be at risk of unidentified cardiovascular disease, and this may play a role in functional impairments seen after ICU discharge.

Research Question

What is the prevalence of myocardial dysfunction after an ICU admission with sepsis and to what extent might it be associated with physical impairments in PICS?

Study Design and Methods

Characterisation of Cardiovascular Function in ICU Survivors of Sepsis (CONDUCT-ICU) is a prospective, multicenter, pilot study characterizing cardiovascular function and functional impairments in survivors of sepsis taking place in the west of Scotland. Survivors of sepsis will be recruited at ICU discharge and followed up 6 to 10 weeks after hospital discharge. Biomarkers of myocardial injury or dysfunction (high sensitivity troponin and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) and systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha) will be measured in 69 patients at recruitment and at follow-up. In addition, a cardiovascular magnetic resonance substudy will be performed at follow-up in 35 patients. We will explore associations between cardiovascular magenetic resonance indexes of cardiac function, biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction and inflammation, and patient-reported outcome measures.

Interpretation

CONDUCT-ICU will provide data regarding the cause and prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of sepsis and will explore associations with functional impairment. It will provide feasibility data and operational learning for larger studies investigating mechanisms of functional impairment after ICU admission and the association between sepsis and adverse cardiovascular events.

Trial Registry

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05633290; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

[Anesthesia for aortic valve stenosis : Anesthesiological management of patients with aortic valve stenosis during noncardiac surgery]

Aortic valve stenosis is a common condition that requires an anesthesiologist's in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, diagnostics and perioperative features of the disease. A newly diagnosed aortic valve stenosis is often initially identified from the anamnesis (dyspnea, syncope, angina pectoris) or a suspicious auscultation finding during the anesthesiologist's preoperative assessment. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to ensure the optimal management of these patients in the perioperative setting. An accurate anamnesis and examination during the preoperative assessment are crucial to select the most suitable anesthetic approach. Additionally, a precise understanding of the hemodynamic peculiarities associated with aortic valve stenosis is necessary. After a short summary of the overall pathophysiology of aortic valve stenosis, this review article focuses on the specific anesthetic considerations, risk factors for complications, and the perioperative management for noncardiac surgery in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies

Haemodynamic monitoring and management are cornerstones of perioperative care. The goal of haemodynamic management is to maintain organ function by ensuring adequate perfusion pressure, blood flow, and oxygen delivery. We here present guidelines on "Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery" that were prepared by 18 experts on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und lntensivmedizin; DGAI).

Assessment of cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound objective structured clinical examinations in graduating anesthesiology residents across multiple residency programs

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To implement and assess a cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in a large cohort of graduating anesthesia residents.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospitals.

SUBJECTS

150 graduating anesthesia residents in their last nine months of training.

INTERVENTIONS

A standardized cardiopulmonary OSCE was administered to each resident.

MEASUREMENTS

The cardiac views evaluated were parasternal long axis (PLAX), apical 4 chamber (A4C), and parasternal short axis (PSAX). The pulmonary views evaluated were pleural effusion (PLE) and pneumothorax (PTX). In addition, a pre- and post-exam survey scored on a 5-point Likert scale was administered to each resident.

MAIN RESULTS

A4C view (mean 0.7 ± 0.3) scored a lower mean, compared to PSAX (mean 0.8 ± 0.3) and PLAX (mean 0.8 ± 0.4). Residents performed well on the PTX exam (mean 0.9 ± 0.3) but more poorly on the PLE exam (mean 0.6 ± 0.4). Structural identification across cardiac and pulmonary views were mostly high (means >0.7), but advanced interpretive skills and maneuvers had lower mean scores. Pre- and post- OSCE survey results were positive with almost all questions scoring >4 on the Likert scale.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that a cardiopulmonary POCUS OSCE can be successfully implemented across multiple anesthesia training programs. While most residents were able to perform basic ultrasound views and identify structures, advanced interpretive skills and maneuvers performed lower.

Perioperative Point of Care Ultrasound for Hemodynamic Assessment: A Narrative Review

While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has traditionally been used in perioperative care, there is growing evidence supporting point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for the anesthesiologist in guiding patient care. It is a quick way to non-invasively evaluate hemodynamically unstable patients and ascertain their state of shock, determine volume status, and guide resuscitation in cardiac arrest. In addition, through use of POCUS, the anesthesiologist is able to identify signs of chronic heart disease to provide a more tailored and safer approach to perioperative care.

Point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasound (LUCAS) study in hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

A clinical conflict often presented with hip fracture patients is whether to proceed with timely surgery or delay surgery until a formal echocardiogram is conducted. This study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating point-of-care lung and cardiac ultrasound (LUCAS) scans as part of the preoperative assessment for hip fracture patients.

METHODS

We recruited 225 consecutive adult patients booked for urgent hip arthroplasty surgery. A LUCAS scan was performed for each patient. The anesthesiologists were asked to provide their anesthetic plans before and after acknowledging the results of the LUCAS scans. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of changes to the anesthetic plan. The secondary outcomes included anesthesiologists' opinions of the LUCAS scans.

RESULTS

One-hundred-ninety-eight patients were included. The majority of LUCAS findings were not severe. A common abnormal finding was hypovolemia (31%). One-hundred-and-six anesthetic management decisions were changed, with 59 of these changes being an escalation of the anesthetic plan, and 47 of these changes being a de-escalation. Eighty-three percent of anesthesiologists agreed that LUCAS affirmed their anesthetic plans and should be an integral part of the perioperative assessment.

CONCLUSION

This study found that LUCAS scans did not significantly alter the anesthetic plan for hip fracture patients. Nevertheless, LUCAS scans can rule out severe cardiopulmonary conditions and allow for both escalation and de-escalation of care. In the setting of early hip surgery, LUCAS presents a viable option in selected patients to address the unmet need to allow for both timely surgery and comprehensive patient evaluation.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03275129); registered 8 July 2018.

Impact of focused cardiac and lung ultrasound screening performed by a junior doctor during admission to the surgical ward on patients before emergency non-cardiac surgery: A pilot prospective observational study

Purpose

To assess whether pre-operative focused cardiac ultrasound and lung ultrasound screening performed by a junior doctor can change diagnosis and clinical management of patients aged ≥65 years undergoing emergency, non-cardiac surgery.

Method

This pilot prospective observational study included patients scheduled for emergency, non-cardiac surgery. The treating team completed a diagnosis and management plan before and after focused cardiac and lung ultrasound, which was performed by a junior doctor. Changes to diagnosis and management after ultrasound were recorded. Ultrasound images were assessed for image and diagnostic interpretation by an independent expert.

Results

There was a total of 57 patients at age 77 ± 8 years. Cardiopulmonary pathology was suspected after clinical assessment in 28% vs. 72% after ultrasound (including abnormal haemodynamic state in 61%, valvular lesions in 32%, acute pulmonary oedema/interstitial syndrome in 9% and bilateral pleural effusions in 2%). In 67% of patients, the perioperative management was changed. The changes were in fluid therapy in 30%, cardiology consultation in 7%, formal in- or out-patient, transthoracic echocardiography in 11% and 30% respectively.

Discussion

The impact of pre-operative focused cardiac and lung ultrasound on diagnosis and management of patients on the hospital ward before emergency non-cardiac surgery by a junior doctor was comparable to previous studies of anaesthetists experienced in focused ultrasound. However, the ability to recognise when image quality is insufficient for diagnosis is an important consideration for novice sonographers.

Conclusions

Focused cardiac and lung ultrasound examination by a junior doctor is feasible and may change preoperative diagnosis and management in patients of 65 years or older, admitted for emergency non-cardiac surgery.

CORONA (COre ultRasOund of covid in iNtensive care and Acute medicine) study: National service evaluation of lung and heart ultrasound in intensive care patients with suspected or proven COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Combined Lung Ultrasound (LUS) and Focused UltraSound for Intensive Care heart (FUSIC Heart - formerly Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography, FICE) can aid diagnosis, risk stratification and management in COVID-19. However, data on its application and results are limited to small studies in varying countries and hospitals. This United Kingdom (UK) national service evaluation study assessed how combined LUS and FUSIC Heart were used in COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients during the first wave of the pandemic.

METHOD

Twelve trusts across the UK registered for this prospective study. LUS and FUSIC Heart data were obtained, using a standardised data set including scoring of abnormalities, between 1st February 2020 to 30th July 2020. The scans were performed by intensivists with FUSIC Lung and Heart competency as a minimum standard. Data was anonymised locally prior to transfer to a central database.

RESULTS

372 studies were performed on 265 patients. There was a small but significant relationship between LUS score >8 and 30-day mortality (OR 1.8). Progression of score was associated with an increase in 30-day mortality (OR 1.2). 30-day mortality was increased in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (49.4% vs 29.2%). Severity of LUS score correlated with RV dysfunction (p < 0.05). Change in management occurred in 65% of patients following a combined scan.

CONCLUSIONS

In COVID-19 patients, there is an association between lung ultrasound score severity, RV dysfunction and mortality identifiable by combined LUS and FUSIC Heart. The use of 12-point LUS scanning resulted in similar risk score to 6-point imaging in the majority of cases. Our findings suggest that serial combined LUS and FUSIC Heart on COVID-19 ICU patients may aid in clinical decision making and prognostication.

The effects of preoperative focused cardiac ultrasound in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial (PREOPFOCUS)

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the third most common cause of mortality worldwide. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) yields information on cardiac status and discloses the presence of unknown pathology. Preoperative FOCUS changes patient treatment, allowing for a patient-tailored anaesthesia. We hypothesised that preoperative FOCUS would reduce the proportion of patients who were either admitted to hospital for more than 10 days or who were dead within 30 days after high-risk, non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This was a randomised, controlled, multi-center study. Patients ≥65 years of age, admitted for urgent orthopaedic- or abdominal surgery, scheduled for general- or neuraxial anaesthesia and with ASA 3/4 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to preoperative FOCUS or no preoperative FOCUS performed in accordance with a predefined protocol. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients admitted more than 10 days or who were dead within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included major complications, days of admission and changes in anaesthesia handling.

RESULTS

During the second COVID-19 wave the study monitoring committee terminated the study prematurely. We included 338 patients of which 327 were included in the final analysis. In the FOCUS group, 41/163 (25%) patients met the criteria for the primary endpoint versus 35/164 (21%) for the control group, adjusted odds ratio 1.37 (95% CI 0.86-2.30), p = .36. The proportions of patients who developed major complications did not differ significantly between groups. Length of hospital stay was 4 (3-8) days in the FOCUS group and 4 (3-7) days on the control group (adjusted p = .24).

CONCLUSION

The routine availability of preoperative FOCUS assessment in this cohort does not appear to reduce the risk for hospitalisation exceeding 10 days or 30-day mortality, although study enrolment was prematurely terminated.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Training for Non-cardiologists: An Overview and Recommendations for a Lower Middle-Income Country

Poor outcomes among the critically ill in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been attributed in part to the challenge of diagnostic delays caused by lack of skilled personnel. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) by non-cardiologists may mitigate the shortage of echocardiography experts to perform emergency echocardiography at the point of care in these settings. It is however crucial that FoCUS training for non-cardiologists in LMICs be based on robust evidence to support training delivery if diagnostic accuracy is to be assured.

Utility of E point septal separation as screening tool for left ventricular ejection fraction in perioperative settings by anesthetists

Background and Aims

Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is a common cause of hemodynamic disturbance perioperatively and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) has great clinical utility. This study was aimed to test the hypothesis that LVSF assessed by an anesthetist using mitral valve E Point Septal Separation (EPSS) has a significant correlation with that assessed using modified Simpson's method perioperatively.

Methods

This prospective observational study included 100 patients scheduled for elective surgeries. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed preoperatively within 24 hours of surgery by an anesthetist as per American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines. EPSS measurements were obtained in parasternal long-axis view while volumetric assessment of LV ejection fraction (EF) used apical four-chamber view. Bivariate analysis of EPSS and LV EF was done by testing Pearson correlation coefficient. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve constructed to obtain area under curve (AUC) and Youden's Index.

Results

The mean value of mitral valve EPSS was 7.18 ± 3.95 mm. The calculated mean LV EF value using volumetric analysis was 56.31 ± 11.92%. LV dysfunction as per ASE guidelines is present in 28% of patients. EPSS was statistically significantly related to LV EF negatively with a Pearson coefficient of -0.74 (P < 0.0001). AUC of ROC curve 0.950 (P < 0.0001) suggesting a statistically significant correlation between EPSS and LV EF. Youden's index of EPSS value 7 mm was obtained to predict LV systolic dysfunction.

Conclusion

Mitral valve EPSS shows a significant negative correlation with gold standard LVEF measurement for LVSF estimation. It can very well be used to assess LVSF perioperatively by anesthetists with brief training.

Competence of anesthesiology residents following a longitudinal point-of-care ultrasound curriculum

PURPOSE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) facilitates diagnostic, procedural, and resuscitative applications in anesthesiology. Structured POCUS curricula improve learner satisfaction, test scores, and clinical management, but the learning curve towards competency and retention of skills over time remain unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study to determine when anesthesiology trainees enrolled in a POCUS curriculum achieve competency in POCUS skills. We also investigated the learning curve of trainees' competency using a POCUS-specific competency-based medical education assessment. The structured, longitudinal POCUS curriculum included online lectures, journal articles, live model scanning sessions, video review of cases, and a portfolio of supervised scans. Point-of-care ultrasound scanning sessions on standardized patients were conducted in the simulation lab for 2.5 hr a week and each resident completed eight sessions (20 hr) per academic year. At each scanning session, timed image acquisition scores were collected and POCUS skills entrustment scale evaluations were conducted. The primary outcome was the number of supervised scans and sessions required to achieve a mean entrustment score of 4 ("may use independently"). Secondary outcomes included image acquisition scores and retention of skills after six months.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) number of supervised scans required for trainees (n = 29) to reach a mean entrustment score of ≥ 4 was 36 (10) scans over nine sessions for rescue echo. A mean entrustment score of ≥ 4 was observed for lung ultrasound after a mean (SD) of 8 (3) scans over two sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that anesthesiology residents can achieve competence in rescue echo and lung ultrasound through participation in a structured, longitudinal POCUS curriculum, and outlines the learning curve for progression towards competency.

Clinical Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Internal Medicine Inpatients: A Systematic Review

The aim in this systematic review was to determine the effect of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) on the clinical decision-making process and patient outcomes in adults admitted to the general medicine ward. A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, LILACS and Cinahl. Articles had to fulfill the inclusion criteria of randomised or non-randomised studies assessing the impact of POCUS on the diagnosis, management, length of hospital stay or mortality of patients admitted to the internal medicine ward. Six studies were included involving a total of 1836 patients. The influence of POCUS on the diagnosis was reported as a change in the main diagnosis or the addition of a relevant diagnosis in up to 18% and 24% of the cases, respectively. Impact on the management plan was reported in 37% to 52.1% of the participants. Three studies documented the impact of POCUS on the length of stay. Two of them reported no difference between groups, and the other reported a significant reduction of 1 d of the hospital stay. In conclusion, POCUS appears to have positive effects on the clinical decision-making process with impacts on optimal patient management and possible reduction in the hospital length of stay.

The role of ultrasonography in anesthesia for bariatric surgery

Bariatric surgeries are effective long-term management for morbid obesity with its adverse sequelae. Anesthesia of bariatric surgeries poses unique challenges for the anesthesiologist in every step starting with vascular access till tracheal extubation. The usage of ultrasound in anesthesia is becoming more prevalent with a variety of benefits, especially in the obese population. Ultrasound is successfully used for obtaining vascular access, with more than 15 million catheters placed in the United States alone. Ultrasound can also be used to predict difficult intubation, as it can confirm the tracheal intubation and assess the gastric content to prevent pulmonary aspiration. Ultrasound is also used in the management of mechanically ventilated patients to monitor lung aeration and to identify respiratory complications during positive pressure ventilation. Moreover, intraoperative echocardiography helps to discover the pulmonary embolism and guides the fluid therapy. Finally, ultrasound can be used to perform neuraxial and fascial plane block with a less overall time of the procedures and minimal complications. The wide use of ultrasound in bariatric anesthesia reflects the learning curve of the anesthesiologists and their mounting efforts to provide safe anesthesia utilizing the updated technology. In this review, we highlight the role of ultrasonography in anesthesia of bariatric surgery and discuss the recent guidelines.

An Approach to Standard Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Practice for Anesthesiologists-Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Protocols

The use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become the standard of care for most cardiac surgical procedures. There are guidelines established for training, practice, and quality improvement in perioperative TEE by the joint efforts of the American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) increasingly is being incorporated into anesthesiologists' training and practice. While a special "certification in Critical Care Echocardiography" was created by the National Board of Echocardiography in 2019, there currently exist no guidelines for training, certification, and practice of perioperative TTE by anesthesiologists. In this review, the authors describe the categories, indications and applications of perioperative TTE and provide a recommended sequence for performing an examination tailored to the evaluation of perioperative patients. Although the authors describe a protocol utilized at their institution, there are no standards described in the literature for PTTE. Cardiac anesthesiologists and cardiac anesthesia societies (Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiologists) must come forward to establish standards working in collaboration with echocardiography societies (American Society of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology).

Impact of focused cardiac ultrasound in vascular surgery patients: A prospective observational study

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and logistical consequences of routine preoperative focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) in patients scheduled for elective vascular surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational study, FOCUS was performed in all patients seen in the vascular surgery outpatient clinic from January 14 to May1, 2019, unless a full echocardiography had been conducted in the preceding 12 months or the patient was already referred to an echocardiography by the vascular surgeons. FOCUS followed a stringent protocol and referrals for a full echocardiography followed predefined criteria.

RESULTS

Preoperative FOCUS was performed in 55 (60%) patients. Of these, 12 patients (22%) revealed cardiac pathology and were referred to a full echocardiography. Coronary angiography was subsequently performed in one of these patients but was without a further consequence. All patients underwent surgery.

CONCLUSION

FOCUS disclosed cardiac pathology in the outpatient clinic but with little clinical consequence. This study does not support routine FOCUS as a part of the preoperative patient cardiovascular assessment before vascular surgery. However, larger studies are warranted to further evaluate the relevance of preoperative FOCUS in a larger sample size.

The Impact on 30-Day Mortality From a Brief Focused Ultrasound-Guided Management Protocol Immediately Before Emergency Noncardiac Surgery in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether brief ultrasound-guided treatment of hemodynamic shock and respiratory failure immediately before emergency noncardiac surgery reduced 30-day mortality.

DESIGN

Parallel, nonblinded, randomized trial with 1:1 allocation to control and intervention groups.

SETTING

Twenty-eight major hospitals within China.

PARTICIPANTS

Six-hundred sixty patients ≥14 years of age, scheduled for emergency noncardiac surgery with evidence of shock (heart rate >120 beat/min, systolic blood pressure< 90 mmHg or requiring inotrope infusion), or respiratory failure (Pulse Oxygen Saturation <92%, respiratory rate >20 beat/min, or requiring mechanical ventilation).

INTERVENTIONS

A brief (<15 minutes) focused ultrasound of ventricular filling and function, lung, and peritoneal spaces, with predefined treatment recommendation based on the ultrasound was performed before surgery or standard care.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included changes in medical or surgical diagnosis and management due to ultrasound, intensive care unit, and hospital stay and cost, and Short Form-8 quality-of-life scores. Although there were frequent changes in diagnosis (82%) and management (49%) after the ultrasound, mortality at 30 days was not different between groups (50 [15.7%] v 53 [16.3%]; odds ratio 1.05, 0.69-1.6, p = 0.826). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes of the days spent in the hospital (mean 13.8 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1-15.6 v 14.4 d, 11.8-17.1, p = 0.718) or intensive care unit (mean 9.3 days, 95% CI 7.7-11.0 v 8.7 d, 7.2-10.2, p = 0.562), hospital cost (USD$14.5K, 12.2-16.7 v 13.7, 11.5-15.9, p = 0.611) or Short Form-8 scores at one year (mean 80.9, 95% CI 78.4-83.3 v 79.7, 76.9-82.5, p = 0.54) between participants allocated to the ultrasound and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with hemodynamic shock or respiratory failure, a focused ultrasound-guided management did not reduce 30-day mortality but led to frequent changes in diagnosis and patient management.

Effect of focused cardiopulmonary ultrasonography on clinical outcome of septic shock: a randomized study

Objective

To investigate the effect of focused ultrasonography on clinical outcomes of septic shock.

Methods

Patients with septic shock were randomized into an integrated cardiopulmonary ultrasonography (ICUS) group and conventional (CON) group. Within 1 hour of admission, the ICUS group underwent ICUS examination for hemodynamic decision-making, while the CON group received standard treatment. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality after admission. The secondary endpoints were cumulative fluid administration in the first 6, 24, and 72 hours; use of vasoactive drugs; lactate clearance; duration of ventilation; and ICU stay.

Results

Ninety-four qualified patients were enrolled (ICUS group, 49; CON group, 45). ICUS showed no significant effect on 28-day mortality. Within the initial 6 hours, the ICUS group tended to have a higher fluid balance and fluid intake than the CON group. The duration of vasopressor support was shorter in the ICUS group. There were no differences in the cumulative fluid infusion within 24 or 72 hours, lactate clearance, ICU stay, or duration of ventilation.

Conclusions

The initially focused ICUS did not affect the clinical outcomes of septic shock, but it tended to be associated with a higher fluid balance within the initial 6 hours and shorter duration of vasopressor support.

Intraoperative Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for Assessment of Hypotension: A Systematic Review

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has become a valuable tool to assess unexplained hypotension in critically ill patients. Due to increasing availability of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) equipment in the operating room, there is a widespread interest in its usefulness for intraoperative diagnosis of hypotension as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the utility of intraoperative FoCUS to assess patients experiencing unexplained hypotension while undergoing noncardiac surgery. We performed a systematic literature search of multiple publication databases for studies that evaluated the utility of intraoperative FoCUS for assessment and management of unexplained hypotension in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, including retro- and prospective clinical studies. A summary of the study findings, study quality, and assessment of level of evidence is presented. We identified 2227 unique articles from the literature search, of which 27 were potentially relevant, and 9 were included in this review. The number of patients pooled from these studies was 255, of whom 228 had intraoperative diagnoses with the aid of intraoperative FoCUS. The level of evidence of all studies included was very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. This systematic review has demonstrated that FoCUS may be a useful, noninvasive method to differentiate causes of intraoperative hypotension and guide correcting interventions, although the quality of evidence is very low. Further prospective high-quality studies are needed to investigate whether intraoperative FoCUS has a diagnostic utility that is associated with improved outcomes.

Building focused cardiac ultrasound capacity in a lower middle-income country: A single centre study to assess training impact

Background

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where echocardiography experts are in short supply, training non-cardiologists to perform Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) could minimise diagnostic delays in time-critical emergencies. Despite advocacy for FoCUS training however, opportunities in LMICs are limited, and the impact of existing curricula uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of FoCUS training based on the Focus Assessed Transthoracic Echocardiography (FATE) curriculum. Our primary objective was to assess knowledge gain. Secondary objectives were to evaluate novice FoCUS image quality, assess inter-rater agreement between expert and novice FoCUS and identify barriers to the establishment of a FoCUS training programme locally.

Methods

This was a pre-post quasi-experimental study at a tertiary hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. Twelve novices without prior echocardiography training underwent FATE training, and their knowledge and skills were assessed. Pre- and post-test scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to establish whether the median of the difference was different than zero. Inter-rater agreement between expert and novice scans was assessed, with a Cohen's kappa >0.6 indicative of good inter-rater agreement.

Results

Knowledge gain was 37.7%, with a statistically significant difference between pre-and post-test scores (z = 2.934, p = 0.001). Specificity of novice FoCUS was higher than sensitivity, with substantial agreement between novice and expert scans for most FoCUS target conditions. Overall, 65.4% of novice images were of poor quality. Post-workshop supervised practice was limited due to scheduling difficulties.

Conclusions

Although knowledge gain is high following a brief training in FoCUS, image quality is poor and sensitivity low without adequate supervised practice. Substantial agreement between novice and expert scans occurs even with insufficient practice when the prevalence of pathology is low. Supervised FoCUS practice is challenging to achieve in a real-world setting in LMICs, undermining the effectiveness of training initiatives.

Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Practice By Cardiac Anesthesiologists-Report of a "Start-Up" Experience

OBJECTIVE

In this paper, the authors report their experience of perioperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) practice and its impact on perioperative patient management.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Single institution, tertiary university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 101 adult ASA II-V male and female patients >18 years old who were scheduled for or having surgery were included in this retrospective case series.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent a focused perioperative TTE exam performed by cardiac anesthesiologists with significant TTE experience, and further clinical management was based on echocardiography findings discussed with the anesthesia care team.

MEASUREMENTS

Significant echocardiographic findings and changes in patient management were reported. Step-up management was a new intervention that was executed based on echocardiographic findings (volume infusion, inotropic therapy, cardiology consultation, and other interventions), and step-down management was avoidance of an unnecessary intervention based on echocardiographic findings (proceeding to surgery without cancellation, delay, cardiology consultation, and additional investigations/interventions).

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-three percent of TTEs were performed in the preoperative setting, 34% were intra-operative, and 13% were postoperative. No significant findings were detected in 38 patients, leading to step-down management in all of them. Among patients with positive findings, left ventricular dysfunction (12.8%), hypovolemia (10.8%), and right ventricular dysfunction (7.9%) were the most common. Step-up therapy included inotropic/vasopressor therapy (24.8%), intensive care admission after surgery for further management (13.8%), volume infusion (12.8%), and other interventions (additional monitoring, surgical delay, cardiology consultation, and modification of surgical technique).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative focused TTE examination is useful in the diagnosis of new cardiac conditions for anesthesia management (intraoperative monitoring and hemodynamic therapy) and postoperative care (intensive care unit admissions). Perioperative TTE performed by anesthesiologists can also help avoid procedural delays and unnecessary consults.

A minimum dataset for a Level 1 echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography

The British Society of Echocardiography has previously outlined a minimum dataset for a standard transthoracic echocardiogram, and this remains the basis on which an echocardiographic study should be performed. The importance of ultrasound in excluding critical conditions that may require urgent treatment is well known. Several point-of-care echo protocols have been developed for use by non-echocardiography specialists. However, these protocols are often only used in specific circumstances and are usually limited to 2D echocardiography. Furthermore, although the uptake in training for these protocols has been reasonable, there is little in the way of structured support available from accredited sonographers in the ongoing training and re-accreditation of those undertaking these point-of-care scans. In addition, it is well recognised that the provision of echocardiography on a 24/7 basis is extremely challenging, particularly outside of tertiary cardiac centres. Consequently, following discussions with NHS England, the British Society of Echocardiography has developed the Level 1 echocardiogram in order to support the rapid identification of critical cardiac pathology that may require emergency treatment. It is intended that these scans will be performed by non-specialists in echocardiography and crucially are not designed to replace a full standard transthoracic echocardiogram. Indeed, it is expected that a significant number of patients, in whom a Level 1 echocardiogram is required, will need to have a full echocardiogram performed as soon as is practically possible. This document outlines the minimum dataset for a Level 1 echocardiogram. The accreditation process for Level 1 echo is described separately.

Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on the hospital length of stay for internal medicine inpatients with cardiopulmonary diagnosis at admission: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial-the IMFCU-1 (Internal Medicine Focused Clinical Ultrasound) study

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a reliable and valid clinical tool that impacts diagnosis and clinical decision-making as well as timely intervention for optimal patient management. This makes its utility in patients admitted to internal medicine wards attractive. However, there is still an evidence gap in all the medical setting of how its use affects clinical variables such as length of stay, morbidity, and mortality.

Methods/design

A prospective randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of a surface POCUS of the heart, lungs, and femoral and popliteal veins performed by an internal medicine physician during the first 24 h of patient admission to the unit with a presumptive cardiopulmonary diagnosis. The University of Melbourne iHeartScan, iLungScan, and two-point venous compression protocols are followed to identify left and right ventricular function, significant valvular heart disease, pericardial and pleural effusion, consolidation, pulmonary edema, pneumothorax, and proximal deep venous thrombosis. Patient management is not commanded by the protocol and is at the discretion of the treating team. A total of 250 patients will be recruited at one tertiary hospital. Participants are randomized to receive POCUS or no POCUS. The primary outcome measured will be hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes include the change in diagnosis and management, 30-day hospital readmission, and healthcare costs.

Discussion

This study will evaluate the clinical impact of multi-organ POCUS in internal medicine patients admitted with cardiopulmonary diagnosis on the hospital length of stay. Recruitment of participants commenced in September 2018 and is estimated to be completed by March 2020.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12618001442291. Registered on 28 August 2018.

Focused cardiac ultrasound in preoperative assessment: the perioperative provider's new stethoscope?

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS)—a simplified, qualitative version of echocardiography—is a well-established tool in the armamentarium of critical care and emergency medicine. This review explores the extent to which FoCUS could also be used to enhance the preoperative physical examination to better utilise resources and identify those who would benefit most from detailed echocardiography prior to surgery. Among the range of pathologies that FoCUS can screen for, the conditions it provides the most utility in the preoperative setting are left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and, in certain circumstances, significant aortic stenosis (AS). Thus, FoCUS could help answer two common preoperative diagnostic questions. First, in a patient with high cardiovascular risk who subjectively reports a good functional status, is there evidence of LVSD? Second, does an asymptomatic patient with a systolic murmur have significant aortic stenosis? Importantly, many cardiac pathologies of relevance to perioperative care fall outside the scope of FoCUS, including regional wall motion abnormalities, diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular outflow obstruction, and pulmonary hypertension. Current evidence suggests that after structured training in FoCUS and performance of 20–30 supervised examinations, clinicians can achieve competence in basic cardiac ultrasound image acquisition. However, it is not known precisely how many training exams are necessary to achieve competence in FoCUS image interpretation. Given the short history of FoCUS use in preoperative evaluation, further research is needed to determine what additional questions FoCUS is suited to answer in the pre-operative setting.

The use of focused cardiac ultrasound to screen for occult heart disease in asymptomatic cats

Background

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) helps detect occult heart disease in human patients.

Hypothesis

Focused cardiac ultrasound by a nonspecialist practitioner (NSP) will increase the detection of occult heart disease in asymptomatic cats compared with physical examination and ECG.

Animals

Three hundred forty‐three client‐owned cats: 54 excluded and 289 analyzed.

Methods

Multicenter prospective cohort study. Twenty‐two NSPs were trained to perform FCU. Cats without clinical signs of heart disease were recruited, and NSPs performed the following in sequential order: physical examination, ECG, FCU, and point‐of‐care N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide assay (POC‐BNP). After each step, NSPs indicated yes, no, or equivocal as to whether they believed heart disease was present. The level of agreement between the NSP diagnosis and a blinded cardiologist's diagnosis after echocardiogram was evaluated using Cohen's kappa test.

Results

Cardiologist diagnoses included 148 normal cats, 102 with heart disease, and 39 equivocal ones. Agreement between NSP and cardiologist was slight after physical examination (kappa 0.253 [95% CI, 0.172‐0.340]), did not increase after ECG (0.256 [0.161‐0.345]; P = .96), increased after FCU (0.468 [0.376‐0.558]; P = .002), and the level of agreement was similar after POC‐BNP (0.498 [0.419‐0.580]; P = .67). In cats with mild, moderate, and marked occult heart disease, the proportion of cats having a NSP diagnosis of heart disease after FCU was 45.6%, 93.1%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Focused cardiac ultrasound performed by NSPs increased the detection of occult heart disease, especially in cats with moderate to marked disease. Focused cardiac ultrasound appears to be a feasible and useful tool to assist NSPs in the detection of heart disease in cats.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography: Current Applications and Future Directions

Focused cardiac ultrasonography is performed by clinicians at the bedside and is used in time-sensitive scenarios to evaluate a patient's cardiovascular status when comprehensive echocardiography is not immediately available. This simplified cardiac ultrasonography is often performed by noncardiologists using small, portable devices to augment the physical examination, triage patients, and direct management in both critical care and outpatient settings. However, as the use of focused cardiac ultrasonography continues to expand, careful consideration is required regarding training, scope of practice, impact on patient outcomes, and medicolegal implications. In this review, we examine some of the challenges with rapid uptake of this technique and explore the benefits and potential risk of focused cardiac ultrasonography. We propose possible mechanisms for cross-specialty collaboration, quality improvement, and oversight.

Perioperative ultrasound-assisted clinical evaluation - A case based review

Ultrasound is increasingly being adopted into anaesthesia and intensive care practice. The range of ultrasound examination has also increased from transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks and vascular access, to examination of the heart, lungs, abdomen and deep veins. Typically, the use of ultrasound is focused or basic, designed to be performed by the anaesthetist at the patient's bedside in real time to answer clinical questions and to direct therapy. Ultrasound is not performed in isolation, but used to complement clinical evaluation, and accordingly can be considered as 'ultrasound-assisted perioperative evaluation'. Whilst there is good evidence that ultrasound improves diagnostic accuracy and in turn alters management, there are few data examining whether ultrasound leads to improved clinical outcomes. This review will examine multiple uses of perioperative ultrasound with case studies to illustrate potential utility.

The PIEPEAR Workflow: A Critical Care Ultrasound Based 7-Step Approach as a Standard Procedure to Manage Patients with Acute Cardiorespiratory Compromise, with Two Example Cases Presented

Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) has been widely used as a useful tool to assist clinical judgement. The utilization should be integrated into clinical scenario and interact with other tests. No publication has reported this. We present a CCUS based "7-step approach" workflow-the PIEPEAR Workflow-which we had summarized and integrated our experience in CCUS and clinical practice into, and then we present two cases which we have applied the workflow into as examples. Step one is "problems emerged?" classifying the signs of the deterioration into two aspects: acute circulatory compromise and acute respiratory compromise. Step two is "information clear?" quickly summarizing the patient's medical history by three aspects. Step three is "focused exam launched": (1) focused exam of the heart by five views: the assessment includes (1) fast and global assessment of the heart (heart glance) to identify cases that need immediate life-saving intervention and (2) assessing the inferior vena cava, right heart, diastolic and systolic function of left heart, and systematic vascular resistance to clarify the hemodynamics. (2) Lung ultrasound exam is performed to clarify the predominant pattern of the lung. Step four is "pathophysiologic changes reported." The results of the focused ultrasound exam were integrated to conclude the pathophysiologic changes. Step five is "etiology explored" diagnosing the etiology by integrating Step two and Step four and searching for the source of infection, according to the clues extracted from the focused ultrasound exam; additional ultrasound exams or other tests should be applied if needed. Step six is "action" supporting the circulation and respiration sticking to Step four. Treat the etiologies according step five. Step seven is "recheck to adjust." Repeat focused ultrasound and other tests to assess the response to treatment, adjust the treatment if needed, and confirm or correct the final diagnosis. With two cases as examples presented, we insist that applying CCUS with 7-step approach workflow is easy to follow and has theoretical advantages. The coming research on its value is expected.

Critical care ultrasonography in circulatory shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective was to define the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and the management of circulatory shock by critical appraisal of the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessment of any patient's hemodynamic profile based on clinical examination can be sufficient in several cases, but many times unclarities remain. Arterial catheters and central venous lines are commonly used in critically ill patients for practical reasons, and offer an opportunity for advanced hemodynamic monitoring. Critical care ultrasonography may add to the understanding of the hemodynamic profile at hand. Improvements in ultrasound techniques, for example, smaller devices and improved image quality, may reduce limitations and increase its value as a complementary tool. Critical care ultrasonography has great potential to guide decisions in the management of shock, but operators should be aware of limitations and pitfalls as well. Current evidence comes from cohort studies with heterogeneous design and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Use of ultrasonography for hemodynamic monitoring in critical care expands, probably because of absence of procedure-related adverse events. Easy applicability and the capacity of distinguishing different types of shock add to its increasing role, further supported by consensus statements promoting ultrasound as the preferred tool for diagnostics in circulatory shock.

Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography

Background

Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients.

Methods

The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland–Altman analyses.

Results

The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32–53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF (r = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision.

Conclusion

LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method.

Rapid decay of transthoracic echocardiography skills at 1 month: A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Focused transthoracic echocardiography (FTTE) is an emerging tool in the management of critically ill patients, but the lack of adequate training models has limited the expansion of this technology. Although basic FTTE training courses have been shown to be sufficient in developing echocardiography skills, limited data exist regarding skill retention. In an effort to develop an adequate FTTE training model, we sought to determine the degree of skill retention after FTTE training.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study.

SETTING

An academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Surgical residents and medical students: 31 subjects were enrolled from February to June 2016.

RESULTS

Participants underwent a 2-hour FTTE course including didactics and a hands-on session measuring ejection fraction of left ventricle (LV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. Written knowledge and performance examinations applying FTTE were conducted before the course, immediately after, and at 1- and 3-month intervals, which were evaluated on a 0 to 9 scale and analyzed with paired t-tests. Performance examination scores obtaining the LV and IVC views preinitial and postinitial training increased from 1.7 to 6.5 (LV) and from 2.0 to 6.8 (IVC) (p < 0.01), decreased to 5.0 and 4.8, respectively, at 1 month (posttraining vs 1 month, p < 0.01), and did not significantly change at 3 months (5.4 and 5.0, respectively). Written examination scores increased from 42% to 62% (pretraining vs posttraining, p < 0.01), decreased to 48% in 1 month (posttraining vs 1 month, p < 0.01), and further decreased to 34% at 3 months (1 month vs 3 month, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a short training course appears sufficient to impart basic FTTE skills and knowledge, skills are significantly decayed at 1 month and knowledge continually decreases at 1 and 3 months. Future FTTE training models should consider the rapid degradation of knowledge and skills in determining frequency of refresher training and ongoing evaluation.

The utilization of critical care ultrasound to assess hemodynamics and lung pathology on ICU admission and the potential for predicting outcome

Aim

Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) has been used by many Intensive Care Units(ICUs) worldwide, so as to guiding the diagnosis and the treatment. However, none of the publications currently systematically describe the utilization of CCUS to analyze the characteristics of hemodynamics and lung pathology upon the new admission to ICU and its potential role in patients’ prognosis prediction. In this retrospective clinical study, we have demonstrated and analyzed the characteristics of hemodynamics and lung pathology assessed by CCUS and investigated its potential to predict patient outcome.

Methods

We have described and analyzed the epidemic characteristics of hemodynamics and lung pathology assessed by CCUS on ICU admission, which based on our database of 451 cases from the biggest medical center in Western China, between November 2014 and October 2015. The patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, prognosis and ultrasonic pattern of hemodynamics and lung pathology had been analyzed. A bivariate logistic regression model was established to identify the correlation between the ultrasonic variables on admission and the ICU mortality.

Results

The mean age of the 451 patients was 56.7±18.7 years; the mean APACHE II score was 19.0±7.9, the ICU mortality was 30.6%. Patients received CCUS examination of pericardial, right ventricle (RV) wall motion, left ventricle (LV) wall motion, LV systolic function, LV diastolic function, lung and volume of inferior vena cava (IVC) were 423(93.8%), 418(92.7%), 392(86.9%), 389(86.3%), 383(84.9%), 440(97.6%), 336(74.5%), respectively; The univariate analysis revealed that length of mechanical ventilation was significantly correlated with the diameter of IVC, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion(TAPSE), mitral annular plane systolic excursion(MAPSE), early diastolic transmitral velocity to early mitral annulus diastolic velocity(E/e’) (p = 0.016, 0.011, 0.000, 0.049, respectively); The TAPSE, ejection fraction(EF), MAPSE, lung ultrasound score (LUS score) (p = 0.000, 0.028, 0.000, 0.011, respectively) were significantly related to ICU mortality. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that APACHE II, age, TAPSE, E/e’ are the independent risk factors for ICU mortality in our study.

Conclusion

CCUS examination on ICU admission which performed by the experienced physician provide valuable information to assist the caregivers in understanding the comprehensive outlook of the characteristics of hemodynamics and lung pathology. Those key variables obtained by CCUS predict the possible prognosis of patients, hence deserve more attention in clinical decision making.

The impact of focused echocardiography using the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol on the management of critically ill patients, and comparison with full echocardiographic studies by BSE-accredited sonographers

Introduction

Focused echocardiography is widely used to assist clinical decision-making in critically ill patients. In the UK, the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is recommended by the Intensive Care Society to ensure consistency of approach and guarantee training standards. Concerns remain about the reliability of information attained by non-expert clinicians in focused echocardiography, particularly when this is used to alter clinical management.

Methods

A prospective, observational evaluation of 60 consecutive patients undergoing Focused Intensive Care Echo studies in a single ICU.

Results

A complete Focused Intensive Care Echo study was possible in 43/60 scans (72%) and new diagnostic information obtained following 41/60 scans (68%), which lead to a change of clinical management in 28/60 (47%) of cases. In 24/60 (40%) of cases, a full transthoracic study was subsequently undertaken by a fully accredited sonographer. There were no cases where the results from the full study contradicted those from the limited Focused Intensive Care Echo study; additional diagnostic information was attained following 68% of full studies.

Conclusion

Focused echocardiography using the Focused Intensive Care Echo protocol is feasible and clinically useful in a high proportion of ICU patients. However, many still require additional expert echocardiographic assessment. Focused echocardiography delivered by non-experts is clinically useful in this setting but its limitations must be understood and access to expert assessment should be available.